…nevertheless, important to the public's interest in 17 monitoring federal courts' exercise of their Article III powers 18 that the public review the documents. 19 With this presumption of public access in mind, the 20 Court turns to the…
…s identity, failing to “include a ‘particularized’ or ‘individualized’ review” of materials to balance the public’s interest in monitoring federal courts’ exercise of their powers against “countervailing private interests,” and “failing to consider international comity.” Doe 171 Br. at…
…for a 15 dispositive motion. It's nevertheless important to the 16 public's interest in monitoring federal courts' exercise of 17 their Article III powers. 18 With this presumption of public access in mind, the 19 Court turns to…
…for a 15 dispositive motion. It's nevertheless important to the 16 public's interest in monitoring federal courts' exercise of 17 their Article III powers. 18 With this presumption of public access in mind, the 19 Court turns to…
…respect to such evidentiary and discovery matters can cause substantial harm” and that such motions “are therefore of value to those monitoring the federal court,” rendering them “subject to at least some presumption of public access.” 929 F.3d at…
…case. The Court should not allow such callous abuse of a First Amendment right, particularly as there is no merit to Dershowitz’s claim (Br. at 21) that ‘public monitoring has an important role to play here.’” Id. at 19…
…The paper’s value to “those monitoring the federal courts” would be “negligible,” id., since the federal court would have exercised no judicial authority in connection with the paper. 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 996 Filed…
…1208 at 2–4. This argument is based on the proposition that public access to the courts is only warranted if the access is ultimately used specifically to monitor the federal courts. But this characterization of the presumption of public…
…14 great weight is given to documents that are material to particular judicial decisions and thus critical to ‘determining litigants’ substantive rights -- conduct at the heart of Article III -- and . . . public monitoring of that conduct.’” All Funds, 643 F. Supp…
…1254 Filed 04/26/22 Page 4 of 18 4 M4j2GiuC 1 documents are nevertheless important to the public interest in 2 monitoring federal courts' exercise of their Article III 3 powers. 4 With this presumption of public access in…
…589, 597 (1978)). Monitoring judicial inaction is as important to the administration of justice and judicial accountability as monitoring judicial opinions. Allowing the public to access motions and papers that a court has failed to decide (or even consider) holds…
…weight afforded to the presumption of access is “governed by the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” Lugosch v…
…by News Corp UK & Ireland Limited or any member of its group. News Corp UK & Ireland Limited may monitor outgoing or incoming emails as permitted by law. It accepts no liability for viruses introduced by this e-mail or attachments…
…to a 'luxury hotel' in the New York area, surrender all her travel documents and be subject to GPS monitoring. But Judge Nathan ruled the British socialite was a significant flight risk, citing her 'substantial international' ties and 'extraordinary financial…
…It is, nevertheless, important to the public’ interest in monitoring federal court’s exercise of their Article II powers that the public reviews the documents.”) 6-7; (“Public access to certain parts of this transcript is outweighed by Ms. Maxwell…
…See Amodeo, 71 F.3d at 1051. Accordingly, given the public’s interest in monitoring the judicial functions overseeing this case, that with important and national ramifications that have been widely reported in the media, the deposition material should be…
… It is, 2 nevertheless, important to the public's interest in monitoring 3 federal courts' exercise of their Article 3 powers. The Court 4 keeps this somewhat less substantial public presumption in mind 5 in determining whether it is outweighed…
…. in the exercise of Article III” authority, and “the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” Brown, 929 F.3d at 49. That analytical jump is unwarranted outside the habeas setting where one cannot necessarily conclude…
… however, no other computer was found. It appeared as though a second computer had been recently removed as the cables ends from the monitor, keyboard and mouse were in the same area. A further search of the room revealed no…
…of the presumption of public access by evaluating “the role of the material at issue in the exercise of the Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” United States v…
Comments