gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1302.0.pdf PDF
…TGP Communications, LLC v. Doe UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Jul 19 2023 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation …
…TGP Communications, LLC v. Doe UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Jul 19 2023 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation …
…cv-7433(LAP) 22-3050 Doe 171 v. Giuffre UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order…
…20-2413-cv Giuffre v. Maxwell USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ELECTRONICALLY FILED FOR THE SECOND CIRCU…
…cv-7433(LAP) 22-3042 Doe 107 v. Giuffre UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order …
…LAP 22-3042 Doe 107 v. Giuffre UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Aug 02 2023 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential …
…Court regarding unsealing, the Court’s protocol and legal precedent dictate that the absence of such participation should not factor negatively into the Court’s balancing of considerations – as it is ultimately the responsibility of this Court, and not the…
…to documents that may be released, they should not receive a second opportunity to object thereafter. Allowing Non-Parties multiple opportunities to object to unsealing would set a precedent that would exponentially delay this process. The same is true of…
…law and urging legal propositions that are, in fact, contrary to Second Circuit precedent, Intervenors’ brief only underscores that the Court should resist allowing its records to result in the publishing of “the painful and sometimes disgusting details of a . …
…They are thus judicial documents at the time of filing. There is no precedent to suggest a filing can lose its status as a judicial document once given. Doe accepts the fact that papers submitted in support of a pending…
…18 the media frenzy attendant to these proceedings will jeopardize Ms. Maxwell’s right to a fair criminal trial, in violation of Supreme Court precedent and Local Rule 23.1. Finally, the materials at issue should not be released publicly…
…Since July 2008, I have been involved in important and precedent-setting crime victims’ rights litigation in the Southern District of Florida trying to protect the rights of various victims under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S…
…respectfully write to ask this Court to protect those non-party interests; a request that is consistent with long-standing Circuit precedent establishing that this responsibility “rests heavily upon the shoulders” of the district court. In re New York Times…
…Since July 2008, I have been involved in important and precedent-setting crime victims’ rights litigation in the Southern District of Florida trying to protect the rights of various victims under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S…
…Since July 2008, I have been involved in important and precedent-setting crime victims’ rights litigation in the Southern District of Florida trying to protect the rights of various victims under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S…
…the mandate issues. Though Ms. Maxwell is considering filing a petition for rehearing, we believe it highly unlikely such petition would be successful as the Second Circuit panel directly followed governing precedent. Ms. Maxwell otherwise appears to agree that the…
…the motion or somehow affected some other judicial function,” Doe 183 MOL at 3, and binding Second Circuit precedent in this very case holds otherwise. Thus, the Court should ignore Doe 183’s speculation about whether or not Judge Sweet…
…motion papers. And Maxwell cites no precedent for the proposition that Doe 1’s memory is a countervailing interest sufficient to justify continued sealing—Doe 1’s medical condition may have been the proper subject of cross-examination, but it…
…not have had a working understanding of the process in the first place.1 Ms. Giuffre argues that “[a]llowing Non-Parties multiple opportunities to object to unsealing would set a precedent that would exponentially delay this process.” (Dkt. no…
…confidence in the administration of justice.”). Indeed, the motion to intervene is devoid of any citations to precedent that allows an individual to exploit these bedrock legal principles solely for his personal benefit, rather than the public at large. Furthermore…
…Preska November 12, 2019 Page |3 decided.”). In light of this precedent, the Court should hold that materials submitted to a court to influence a judicial decision are judicial documents even in the case of undecided motions. II. Whether a…
Comments