gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1328.22.pdf PDF
…UP REFERENCE THIS CASE. CASE INFORMATION WAS GIVEN. THE DISPOSITION IN THIS CASE WILL BE CLASSIFIED AS INACTIVE PENDING FURTHER printed by Employee Id#: 8557 on April ll:05:24AM …
…UP REFERENCE THIS CASE. CASE INFORMATION WAS GIVEN. THE DISPOSITION IN THIS CASE WILL BE CLASSIFIED AS INACTIVE PENDING FURTHER printed by Employee Id#: 8557 on April ll:05:24AM …
…conducted by New York City Transit Authority); United States v. Aref, 533 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2008) (finding that where classified information presented at trial, if disclosed, would jeopardize national security weighed against public access); Lugosch v. Pyramid Co…
…Ms. Maxwell has clarified (a) which pages are included in each Sealed Exhibit, and (b) which of those pages were released in their entirety by the 2nd Circuit. Counsel for Ms. Maxwell has conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel and believes…
…had some remarkable memory lapses during earlier depositions, feigned incomprehension of common words such as “puppet,” as well as repeatedly requesting that questions be re-asked or clarified, over and over and over again, when the those questions were clear…
…delaying a sealing decision until it ruled on the underlying motion to be sealed. In reaching its decision, the court clarified that, in determining whether documents are judicial, courts should not weigh “the extent to which [the documents] were relied…
…In assigning a “lesser presumption” to such materials, the District Court relied on a single sentence of dicta from our decision in United States v. Amodeo.16 We have since clarified, however, that this sentence was based on a “quotation…
…she has. Plaintiff intentionally omitted the deposition pages from Ms. Maxwell’s testimony which clarified the age and misstated in her Reply that she “admitted” to “threesomes with multiple girls.” This was an intentional misrepresentation of fact. 2. “Ms. Giuffre…
…2006) (holding contested documents were judicial documents "to which a presumption of immediate access applie[d]".) (emphasis added). In Bernstein, this Court clarified the proper order in which the presumption, and its weight, are to be analyzed: [The] balancing test…
…book, her intent at the time she gathered the information was not to publish it. Subsequent decisions in this district have clarified that “the relevant time frame is not when any fact gathering for the subject of the subpoena began…
…representing Ghislaine Maxwell, my 3 understanding is the person on the phone is 4 representing Jeffrey Epstein, not Ghislaine 5 Maxwell. That needs to be clarified. 6 MR. INDYKE: Correct. Correct. 7 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: The answer is 8 correct? …
…book, her intent at the time she gathered the information was not to publish it. Subsequent decisions in this district have clarified that “the relevant time frame is not when any fact gathering for the subject of the subpoena began…
…book, her intent at the time she gathered the information was not to publish it. Subsequent decisions in this district have clarified that “the relevant time frame is not when any fact gathering for the subject of the subpoena began…
…In assigning a “lesser presumption” to such materials, the District Court relied on a single sentence of dicta from our decision in United States v. Amodeo.16 We have since clarified, however, that this sentence was based on a “quotation…
…In assigning a “lesser presumption” to such materials, the District Court relied on a single sentence of dicta from our decision in United States v. Amodeo.16 We have since clarified, however, that this sentence was based on a “quotation…
…Co., the Florida Supreme Court further clarified that the attorney-client privilege "is not concerned with the litigation needs of the opposing party," and that ''there is no exception provided under § 90.502 that allows the discovery of attorney-client…
…In assigning a “lesser presumption” to such materials, the District Court relied on a single sentence of dicta from our decision in United States v. Amodeo.16 We have since clarified, however, that this sentence was based on a “quotation…
Comments