👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (959 words)
From: Martin Weinberg
To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 14:47:31 +0000
Ok
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 11, 2018, at 10:42 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
ok i agree, tell him any contact is off the record , and if he is agreeable , he can send you questions . or the
episode to review.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Martin G. Weinberg < > wrote:
if we think it's a real show that is going on air, better to get the questions, warn them that the factual predicate is
untruthful and put them on notice
if we think the guy is fishing around for a story and wants to engage to support his effort to get the show to play, then its
best to ignore
I never heard of the guy, have no contacts to assess the likelihood there is a real show about to play. If we think its
real, better to get questions and wam them than to ignore and let them play without any rebuttal or warning.
From: jeffrey E.
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 10:32 AM
To: Martin G. Weinberg
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
but is it not better than to get the quetsions and then put them on notice re defamation?
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Martin G. Weinberg <a. wrote:
if we don't answer, we immunize them from defamation lawsuit
we cannot warn them of defamation without knowing the subject
they will say they emailed a rep of you with questions and received no answers
From: jeffrey E.
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 10:17 AM
To: Martin G. Weinberg
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
downside of getting the questions?
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Martin G. Weinberg < > wrote:
unless there is a thought of denying the questions I would ignore, but if it's a TV show they will just "play" the
allegations without reservation. he is apparently just covering himself re defamation
From: jeffrey E.
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 10:06 AM
To: Martin Weinberg
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
what do you think? hes reached out everywhere. no contact ? makes it difficutlt to say i reached out and they responded no
comment. ? you might ask if your interaction woudl be offthe record as he is rerpsenting himself as a journalist. you might
ask him to send his credentials and questions and though you are not my general counsel you cannot guarantee they make it to
me. ? thoughts?
EFTA01007011
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Martin Weinberg wrote:
Let me know about whether to ignore or elicit the questions
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jackie Perczek <Ma
Date: August 11, 2018 at 6:54:01 AM EDT
To: Marti Weinberg a, "
Cc: Roy Black <M INI>
Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein
Please let me know if you would like me to respond.
From: Matt Williams <mailto:
Sent: Friday, August 10, 20184:00 PM
To: Jackie Perczek < >
Subject: Jeffrey Epstein
Hello Jackie,
I hope you don't mind me contacting you. I'm a journalist currently fad-checking a forthcoming episode of VICHAND that
touches on the investigation concerning your client Jeffrey Epstein. We were hoping to approach Mr Epstein or a
representative for comment regarding a number of allegations in the episode and I wondered what would be the best way
to proceed. Could I possibly forward some questions to you (I'm assuming here that you still represent Mr Epstein)? Or is
there someone you could put us in contact with who could assist further?
Kind regards,
Matt
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or bye-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
Virus-free.
please note
EFTA01007012
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or bye-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01007013
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
0191deccdf3ea5baffa13e846c6a801674f6fda9068e1ed2af816cae88208a61
Bates Number
EFTA01007011
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
3
💬 Comments 0