EFTA00867413.pdf

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" < To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacatioMe{,ginail.com>, <I Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:02:28 +0000 Importance: Normal I will be speaking with Alan's lawyers at 2:30. They are considering an intervention despite the Reinhart Order. I intend to tell them that you would not consent to your lawyer (prior lawyer?) testifying about his relationship with you at this time at a voluntary deposition. A battle of video depositions would not in anyway help anyone. From: jeffrey E. Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 7:48 AM To: Kathy Ruemmler ; Darren Indyke ; Alan Dershowitz ; Martin Weinberg Subject: Condusion my friend upon hearing the evidence that l is lying said ". Jeffrey, you're being silly, every thinking person knows she is lying but you have to admit it's fun to watch. Royals sex money celebrity. How can you not watch". Let's deal with it with a legal motion and I strongly suggest a halt in trying to manage . It merely contributes to the theater. Thanks please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00867413