EFTA00745413
EFTA00745415 DataSet-9
EFTA00745425

EFTA00745415.pdf

DataSet-9 10 pages 3,477 words document
P17 P23 P19 V11 V16
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (3,477 words)
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com> To: TOMMY MOTTOLA Subject: Re: confidential. Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:31:03 +0000 EMI worth £2bn less than we paid, Hands says By Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson Published: February 14 2010 22:46 I Last updated: February 14 2010 22:46 Guy Hands, the boss of private equity group Terra Firma, has admitted EMI is worth £2bn ($3.1bn) less than he paid for it in 2007, in a calculation that could provide a valuation benchmark for any future sale of all or part of the indebted music company behind Coldplay and Lily Allen. Mr Hands wrote last November to Citigroup <http://markets.ft.com/tearsheets/performance.asp?s=us:C> , the bank that financed the ill-fated £4.2bn takeover by Terra Firma, proposing a "complete restructuring of EMI" based on a new enterprise value of just £2.2bn. The letter, filed by Citigroup with a New York court on Friday, is the first official acknowledgement that Terra Firma's equity is all but worthless. Mr Hands offered to raise £1bn of new equity if Citigroup would write off £1bn of debt, before suing the bank after it turned his offer down. Mr Hands' proposal <http://www.11.com/cms/s/0/2d1fe7b2-ec0b-Ilde-8070-00144feab49a.html> valued EMI Music Publishing at £1.46bn and EMI Music, its record company, at less than £800m. Terra Firma has written down its original equity by 90 per cent. The offer "would enable Citi to realise a certain and quick recovery" at a significant premium to the valuation of Warner Music, EMI's closest rival, he argued. Citi refused to write off debt without getting something in return, saying it did not see "sufficient value". The letter discloses that Mr Hands offered to split EMI in two, a move that could have ringfenced its more stable music publishing arm, protecting that part of Terra Firma's investment should EMI Music breach covenants on Citigroup's loans, as it now risks doing. Separating recorded music from music publishing could also have paved the way for a sale of one or both divisions, according to a person close to the company. Another person close to the company said this was not Mr Hands' motivation. Mr Hands' statement that he believed Terra Firma and Citigroup were "in agreement in relation to a number of key components of an acceptable solution, including the need to separate the two businesses", is likely to encourage would be-bidders. Warner Music has said it sees no regulatory hurdles <http://markets.ft.cornitearsheeSperformance.asp? s=us:WMG> to a bid for EMI Music. Industry observers believe EMI Music Publishing would attract offers from private equity firms and pension funds should it come up for sale. Mr Hands' letter highlights his concern about "adverse publicity" if no agreement were reached with Citigroup before his EMI acquisition vehicle filed accounts for the year to March 3. Those accounts, released this month, showed auditors had "significant doubts" about the company's ability to continue as a going concern. EFTA00745415 Terra Firma now needs to raise £120m from investors by June, or risk losing control of EMI to Citigroup. The letter also shows concern about EMI's pension liabilities <http://www.R.com/cros/s/0/33e0bc9c-I I cd-1 I df- b6e3-00144feab49a.html> . The proposal to Citigroup included injecting £75m upfront to the pension scheme and m in payments over nine years. Citigroup, which denies Terra Firma's claim that it fraudulently misrepresented the position of a rival bidder in the 2007 auction, said in its court submission that a London trial would not jeopardise the Terra Firma chairman's status as a tax exile in Guernsey. Terra Firma argued this month that the case belonged in New York. On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 2:46 PM, TOMMY MOTTOLA < wrote: Begin fonvarded message: From: Date: February 14, 2010 2:40:06 PM EST To: Hunter <I Subject: Fw: confidential. Reply-To: Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T Original Message----- From: michael jurkovac Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:19:44 To: Cc: Scott Spanjich Subject: confidential. INTRODUCING THE FASHIONTRUSTS A NETWORK THAT RE-DEFINES HOW TALENT AND BRANDS PRODUCE, DISTRIBUTE AND MONETIZE CONTENT TOGETHER! I. PRODUCE: the art+fashion group (pier59, 35T productions, 59 red motion, etc.) is the (service-based) support network for "now generation" photographers and the fashionTrust®. 2. DISTRIBUTE: fashionTrust® is the digital media network with proprietary social tools that help models, photographers and other fashion-related members (stylists, hair and make-up artists, promoters, etc.) market themselves. 3. MONETIZE: i think this is what you and tommy are talking about when you ask, "what can we own (beyond the tools outlined in the Confidential Investment Memorandum" — i.e., how do we partner with artists and brands to create original IP — a catalog that we own and EFTA00745416 license back to the brands. as discussed, this is in essence is what photographers do (they get paid to create assets and then they license the usage of these assets back to the brand and/ or get paid a buyout fee) ... AND what we have been hying to do — albeit one-step at a time — at cYclops LLC with the IP that we create and manage. the fees and overhead for these services (basically $4M) were not included in the CIM for fashionTrust® because they threw the investment/ return model off. nobody is investing directly in production companies or the content that they create — it is currently a service business. change the model, change the game. • step one > ELV1S: we were paid $240k by RCA to create the platform for the launch of the 30 #1 Hits album. we delivered the "look and feel" for the program; partnered RCA/ EPE with nike, f3te and other brands for 2% of the media that they placed behind the program plus the right to produce original "mobile graceland" merchandise for a 12% royalty to EPE. the album sold in excess of 6M copies on a projection of 600k and we were retained to develop the E2: second-to-none property. in february 2005, robert sillerman acquired an 85% interest in elvis presley enterprises, Inc. • step two > SPORTS ILLUSTRATED SWIMSUIT ISSUE: we were paid $240k by sports illustrated to produce the 2007 swimsuit: music issue and tnt network special. working directly with editor terry mcdonell we helped produce and score each of the 2007 spreads/ "behind-the-scenes" shoots with original music from beyonce, fergie, will.i.am and sergio mendes, big & rich, elvis presley, james brown and the stax catalog, amongst others. this soundtrack drove the "look and feel" of the tnt special which we helped SI package to major brands like budweiser and victoria's secret in return for back-end participation and the creation of a disposable iPod which featured the respective playlists. that product was a flop because no one, other than bud.tv, was ever going to buy music for $19.99 regardless of whether or not it was essentially a CD that played itself. great marketing gimic but not a sustainable revenue model — even with $1M of bartered SI media support. the cYclick® was born from this experiment and the incremental fees directed to cYclops LLC from the 6-month license we delivered to Budweiser — we owned 66% of the IP/ SI 33%. New York, NY — Feb. 14, 2007 — Time Inc.'s Sports Illustrated releases its first-ever music-themed swimsuit issue today with an edition that's tied to the sounds of Brazil, Memphis, Jamaica and Miami. The effort will be backed by the release of a series of revolutionary pre-loaded portable digital music players called dop! The dop! players contain over two hours of music inspired by the issue's lush and sexy photo spreads, as well as a music-themed Swimsuit special that will air on cable network TNT on Feb. 17, 2007. The S.I. dop! music player and cable special are the result of a partnership between cYclops LLC, Sports Illustrated's content Executive Production company, which has been tasked with extending the EFTA00745417 magazine's brand and print assets into areas of sight, sound and motion and Sports Illustrated. • step three > SWIMSUIT, DONE RIGHT (original proposal attached below). for $2.5M we create our own swimsuit issue, distribute it on CBS the night b4® the super bowl; via covers/ feature editorial in 12 niche publishing titles; and the fashionTrust® online network... and then we license the rights back to participating brands. we do this by partnering with the artists — in this case the photographers and top models from IMG and marilyn that SI couldn't get — to create a library of IP and merch (digital and hard goods — like pirelli-like calendars,high end coffee table books on each model, supermodel bottle water deals, downloadable music and work-out videos, digital wallpaper downloads, etc.) that we own in perpetuity. all of which leverages the proprietary fashionTrust® social tools, production and distribution network that is outlined in the CIM. we pay the photographers and models to OWN the assets in the same way they are paid — but the upside is that we split profits 50/50 with them as IP owners. jeb in your "say we make S1M" scenario this is how the profits from the SWIMSUIT, DONE RIGHT would break out: • fees are a guaranteed to the photogs/ models as draw against editorial/ catalog rates. we keep 50% of the profits ($500k)/ the artists split the other 50% ($250k to the photographer/ $250k to the model pool). • we, which includes the photogs and the models, OWN the IP against these splits and the next ten shoots we produce in perpetuity. the brands own the rights to use the IP for as long as they pay the license. sports illustrated has built a significant business from this every year — and there is no real money in it for the artists (photogs/ models). with the proper finding, we can do it better. in fact, with cYclick® and the content we shot and edited from necker, we just did. we need the money and the ongoing content/ IP creation team to create 3 or more of these every year — with top photographers, models and musicians... and we need to OWN the IP going forward and then license it back to the brands AND make money with the artists via the content that we produce, distribute and manage, together. in the original model, i projected.... EFTA00745418 YEAR ONE COSTS: STAFFING $360,000 ceo, biz/ dew and sales (based on half rate) 120,000 coo, original content (based on half rate) 120,000 head-of-production, original content (based on half rate) 120,000 ORIGINAL CONTENT TEAM $465,000 editor (based on half rate) 80,000 fashion director (based on half rate) 80,000 designer (based on half rate) 70,000 flash designer/ programmer 70,000 lead writer (based on half rate) 50,000 freelance "stringer" pool (based on 15 features/ blogs per month) 50,000 project/ content manager 65,000 OPERATIONS $130,000 ORIGINAL CONTENT PRODUCTION $3,000,000 to produce a monthly "online" fashionTrust® magazine PLUS up to three other original content platforms - SWIMSUIT, DONE RIGHT and two others that we would develop, produce and distribute off of the success/ money generated from the respective SDR licenses. note: VS spent over $2M to produce the shoot on necker island and they own it BUT they didn't get the cbs special and/ or any of the other incremental upsides from our program. in a perfect world we would have delivered both for in excess of $4M in licenses... and owned all of it in perpetuity with the photographer (russell james) and the models (IMG and marilyn girls). VS would have gotten everything they needed for their SWIM '10 catalog and then some based on the music and media and "once-click" tools and social network comprised of thousands of models. note: amex, via guy mcarter and green room entertainment (their media company) was interested but decided to go with another program — we hadn't shot the necker content necker yet and/ or proven that we could produce the quality of videos we ended up producing with the girls we said we could deliver. SI was a safer bet for them. here's three pages from the SWIMSUIT, DONE RIGHT presentation AND the actual deck. take a look and call me. EFTA00745419 inichael jurkovac ceo, executive producer cYclops 515 west 20th, suite 5w nYc 10011 ain cell INTRODUCING THE FASHIONTRUST® A NETWORK THAT RE-DEFINES HOW TALENT AND BRANDS PRODUCE, DISTRIBUTE AND MONETIZE CONTENT TOGETHER! 1. PRODUCE: the art+fashion group (pier59, 359° productions, 59 red motion, etc.) is the (service-based) support network for "now generation" photographers and the fashionTrust®. 2. DISTRIBUTE: fashionTrust® is the digital media network with proprietary social tools that help models, photographers and other fashion-related members (stylists, hair and make-up artists, promoters, etc.) market themselves. 3. MONETIZE: i think this is what you and tommy are talking about when you ask, "what can we own (beyond the tools outlined in the Confidential Investment Memorandum" — i.e., how do we partner with artists and brands to create original IP — a catalog that we own and license back to the brands. as discussed, this is in essence is what photographers do (they get paid to create assets and then they license the usage of these assets back to the brand and/ or get paid a buyout fee) ... AND what we have been trying to do — albeit one-step at a time — at cYclops LLC with the IP that we create and manage. the fees and overhead for these services (basically $4M) were not included in the CIM for fashionTrust® because they threw the investment/ return model off nobody is EFTA00745420 investing directly in production companies or the content that they create — it is currently a service business. change the model, change the game. • step one > ELVIS: we were paid $240k by RCA to create the platform for the launch of the 30 #1 Hits album. we delivered the "look and feel" for the program; partnered RCA/ EPE with nike, fye and other brands for 2% of the media that they placed behind the program plus the right to produce original "mobile graceland" merchandise for a 12% royalty to EPE. the album sold in excess of 6M copies on a projection of 600k and we were retained to develop the E2: second-to- none property. in february 2005, robert sillerman acquired an 85% interest in elvis presley enterprises, Inc. • step two > SPORTS ILLUSTRATED SWIMSUIT ISSUE: we were paid $240k by sports illustrated to produce the 2007 swimsuit: music issue and tnt network special. working directly with editor terry mcdonell we helped produce and score each of the 2007 spreads/ "behind-the-scenes" shoots with original music from beyonce, fergie, will.i.am and sergio mendes, big & rich, elvis presley, james brown and the stax catalog, amongst others. this soundtrack drove the "look and feel" of the tnt special which we helped SI package to major brands like budweiser and victoria's secret in return for back-end participation and the creation of a disposable iPod which featured the respective playlists. that product was a flop because no one, other than bud.tv was ever going to buy music for $19.99 regardless of whether or not it was essentially a CD that played itself. great marketing gimic but not a sustainable revenue model — even with $1M of bartered SI media support. the cYclick® was born from this experiment and the incremental fees directed to cYclops LLC from the 6-month license we delivered to Budweiser — we owned 66% of the IP/ SI 33%. New York, NY— Feb. 14, 2007 — Time Inc. s Sports Illustrated releases itsfirst-ever music-themed swimsuit issue today with an edition that's tied to the sounds of Brazil, Memphis, Jamaica and Miami. The effort will be backed by the release of a series of revolutionary pre-loaded portable digital music players called clop! The dop! players contain over two hours of music inspired by the issue's lush and sexy photo spreads, as well as a music-themed Swimsuit special that will air on cable network TNT on Feb. 17, 2007. The S.I. dop! music player and cable special are the result of a partnership between cYclops LLC, Sports Illustrated's content Executive Production company, which has been tasked with extending the magazine's brand and print assets into areas of sight, sound and motion and Sports Illustrated. • step three > SWIMSUIT, DONE RIGHT (original proposal attached below). for $2.5M we create our own swimsuit issue, distribute it on CBS the night b4® the super bowl; via covers/ feature editorial in 12 niche publishing titles; and the fashionTrust® online network... and then we license the rights back to participating brands. we do this by partnering with the artists — in this case the photographers and top models from IMG and marilyn that SI couldn't get — to create a library of IP and merch (digital and hard goods — like pirelli- like calendars,high end coffee table books on each model, supermodel bottle water deals, downloadable music and work-out videos, digital wallpaper downloads, etc.) that we own in perpetuity. all of which leverages the proprietary fashionTrust® social tools, production and distribution network that is outlined in the CIM. we pay the photographers and models to OWN the assets in the same way they are paid — but the upside is that we split profits 50/50 with them as IP owners. EFTA00745421 jeb in your "say we make $1M" scenario this is how the profits from the SWIMSUIT, DONE RIGHT would break out: • fees are a guaranteed to the photogs/ models as draw against editorial/ catalog rates. we keep 50% of the profits ($500k)/ the artists split the other 50% ($250k to the photographer/ $250k to the model pool). • we, which includes the photogs and the models, OWN the IP against these splits and the next ten shoots we produce in perpetuity. the brands own the rights to use the IP for as long as they pay the license. sports illustrated has built a significant business from this every year — and there is no real money in it for the artists (photogs/ models). with the proper funding, we can do it better. in fact, with cYclick® and the content we shot and edited from necker, we just did. we need the money and the ongoing content/ IP creation team to create 3 or more of these every year — with top photographers, models and musicians... and we need to OWN the IP going forward and then license it back to the brands AND make money with the artists via the content that we produce, distribute and manage, together. in the original model, i projected.... YEAR ONE COSTS: STAFFING $360,000 ceo, biz/ dev and sales (based on half Me) 120,000 coo, original content (bawd on haw rale) 120,000 head-of-production, original content (based on half rate) 120,000 ORIGINAL CONTENT TEAM $46 5,0 0 0 editor (based on half rate) so,000 fashion director (based on halfrate) 80,000 designer (based on half rate) 70,000 flash designer/ programmer 70,000 lead writer (based on half rate) so,000 freelance "stringer• pool (based on 15 features/ blogs per month) so,000 project/ content manager 65,000 OPERATIONS $130,000 ORIGINAL CONTENT PRODUCTION $3,000,000 to produce a monthly "online" fashionTrust® magazine PLUS up to three other original content platforms - SWIMSUIT, DONE RIGHT and two others that we would develop, produce and distribute off of the success/ money generated from the respective SDR licenses. note: VS spent over $2M to produce the shoot on necker island and they own it BUT they didn't get the cbs special and/ or any of the other incremental upsides from our program. EFTA00745422 in a perfect world we would have delivered both for in excess of $4M in licenses... and owned all of it in perpetuity with the photographer (russell james) and the models (IMG and marilyn girls). VS would have gotten everything they needed for their SWIM '10 catalog and then some based on the music and media and "once-click" tools and social network comprised of thousands of models. note: amex, via guy mcarter and green room entertainment (their media company) was interested but decided to go with another program - we hadn't shot the necker content necker yet and/ or proven that we could produce the quality of videos we ended up producing with the girls we said we could deliver. SI was a safer bet for them. here's three pages from the SWIMSUIT, DONE RIGHT presentation AND the actual deck. take a look and call me. michael jurkovac ceo, executive producer cYclops 515 west 20th, suite 5w nYc 10011 main direct cell EFTA00745423 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00745424
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
03e7ec8ff3b06ccaf78897ceab4a229b4743b7e1f20a3de12f434515d887fc1b
Bates Number
EFTA00745415
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
10

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!