📄 Extracted Text (407 words)
From: Noam Chomsky
To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Cc: Valeria Chomsky •t: >
Subject: marital trust
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 02:27:02 +0000
Attachments: Letter Father_1-26-18.docx
Jeffrey:
Below a letter that I plan to send to the three children about the marital trust. Is it OK? Anything wrong or
missing?
Noam
You wrote me a letter to which I haven't yet sent a response. I'll respond to the points you raise, which are based
on serious misunderstanding and information that is quite wrong. That should be clarified. But I'm writing now
about something else.
I don't know whether Max has informed you about our recent correspondence about his trusteeship of the marital
trust, but whether or not he did, I'd like to tell you the facts of the matter. And to explain why I have asked you
to request that Max resign as Trustee to be replaced by a legitimate independent Trustee.
Max is seriously misinterpreting the history and nature of the marital trust, and the documents pertaining to it. In
your letter you misinterpreted this in the same way that he does. The facts are these:
M and I set up the trust with Eric Menouya, at Palmer Dodge, long ago. Eric suggested that for tax reasons, part
of my estate should be transferred to a trust in name. We agreed, in part for our own reasons: we assumed
that she would survive me.
To set up a Trust, as Eric explained, I first transfer the funds to a Carol Chomsky Revocable Trust, which is then
transferred to a Marital Trust in Carol Chomsky's name. That is a pure technicality of Trust law. There was
never the slightest idea about my managing funds for me and her managing funds for her. That is an outlandish
idea, which never even occurred to either of us. Or to Eric, I am sure. It was a technical device to set up a Trust
in her name, for estate purposes. Our assumption, perfectly understood by Eric (and pretty obvious without
explanation) is that the funds would be available to the survivor.
Those are the facts. I'm rather surprised, to put it mildly, that questions arise about it.
My own understanding is perhaps explained further by a letter, attached, which I wrote a while ago but never
sent you, after I wrote you a letter, not answered, in which I explained why I felt that all of this is very simple.
EFTA00903723
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
05cc2a6691b7be45b1347163e300fae3203673d6804a75e2694ff0d8dc5aced4
Bates Number
EFTA00903723
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0