EFTA01798873.pdf

From: jeffrey epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:16 PM To: Warwick Wicksman Subject: Re: LS1 design sketches You could lower pool 2 ft bit if we low=r living below 59 . How and where do we make the transition ? Sorry f=r all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:10=PM, Warwick WicksmanU wrote: Ok. We can raise the ce=ling height in the living room. A couple of questions: Do you have a preferred elevati=n from what we sent? &n=sp; =nbsp; Warwick Wicksman, AIA Princi al =nbsp; &nbs=; &n=sp; Gensler <http://www.gensler.=om/> http://www.Gensler.com=/o:p> Click here to view Gensler's 2=10 Annual Report. <http://www.gensler.=om/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_2010.pdf> From: jeffrey eps=ein Lmailto:[email protected] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 3:01 PM To: Warwick Wicksman Subject: Re: LSJ design sketches Warwick , Tom has all the dimensions of the living ro=m . These are not those. Please copy Santa Fe . 20 ft ceilings in living . H=ight more important there than pool . Doors on east end match west end. Gal=ery height no more than 12 . Stairs to mezz cannot be in the center of pool Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone EFTA_R1_00137115 EFTA01798873 On Jan 21, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Warwick Wicksman wrote: Jeffrey, Attached please find some sketches based on w=at you and Tom reviewed at the Island last week. Plans ("65 main level", 40=804)G5 lower level", and "G5 mezzanine level", 4e=8040G5 roof"): Please confirm if we are approved to proceed=with this building layout. We need to get the main building going ASAP , and want to release the structural engineer and pool engineer t= move ahead. Tom is still studying the stairs and the exterior elevat=ons; that can continue to develop. But we need to know if the main 4>=804>boxes" are set. Exterior Elevations ("elevation s=udy A..." and "elevation study b..."):<=span> These sketches are based on what was discuss=d last week. ="A" includes sloped-roof and f=at-roof version that matches the design of the existing buildings. * =sr includes a flat-roof miss=on-style concept for the living room, with the two options for the entry bu=lding (one mission, one matching existing). * =Our initial preference is leaning towards the=sloped-roof version of A, but we want to each scheme with you in more detai=. Sections: These show the basic heights, based on the s=oped-roof version of elevation "A". Please review and comment, and let us know i= the floor plans are approved! Thanks, Warwick = &=bsp; &nb=p; Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal =nbsp; &nbs=; &n=sp; Gensler 2 EFTA_R1_00137116 EFTA01798874  http://www.Gensler.co= <http://www.gensler.com/> Click here to view Gensler's 2010 Annual Report. chttp://www.gensler.com/uploads/documents/AR_2010_10_22_20=0.pdf> <Elevation Study A 1-21-11.POF> <Elevation Study B 1-21.11.PDF> <Option GS -lower plan.pdf> <Option GS -mezzanine level.pdf> <Option GS main level.pdf> <Option GS -roof plan.pdf> <Option GS -Section A and B.PDF> 3 EFTA_R1_00137117 EFTA01798875