📄 Extracted Text (286 words)
From: "
To: USANYS)
Subject: motion
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 03:33:21 +0000
Attachments: Exhibit_B jproposed_redaetions].pdf
From:
Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 9:43 PM
To:
Cc SANYS
Subject: RE: Daubert motion
Thanks very much, I've reviewed and have no substantive edits. There were a few typos, but I gather from the
email chain that mu tip e proofreads are ongoing, so don't want to clutter your inbox with track changes on those. Agree,
there is no need to redact this filing and agree with your proposed approach to the exhibits.
Fro
Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 7:02 PM
To:
Cc: (USANYS)
Subject: FW: Daubert motion
This is the version ready for you, and specifically, Part I.C.4-6.
Also, team, I don't think we need to redact this filing, but we definitely want to redact the defense expert notice and the
attached defense list of material, so I'm inclined to just file these temporarily under seal again. Let me know your
thoughts, and I'll add our customary sealing footnote.
From:
Sent: Monda November 8 2021 6:57 PM
To:
Subject: Daubert motion
Hey.
Passing the pen back to you while I'm joining the Rocchio witness prep.
I've inputted the chiefs' comments,=s comments, and the citecheck from IR . I'll be done with the webex at 10 and
will finalize the exhibit attachments then. So that leaves inputting the intern citec eck from which I've also
attached, making sure those two articles don't contain any bombs before we file them, and anything else you have the
time or inclination to do.
Thank you again for all your help with this!
EFTA00086354
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
1 Saint Andrews Plaza
New York, New York 10007
EFTA00086355
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
07402aa64af286777877b2e13cdd89914a3e4c07e681fdbf2ca82904fa8e059a
Bates Number
EFTA00086354
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0