EFTA01145199
EFTA01145205 DataSet-9
EFTA01145207

EFTA01145205.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 687 words document
D5 V15 P17 D3
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (687 words)
From: Todd Meister To: "jeevacation®gmail.com" leevacation®gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:24:12 +0000 Attachments: [Untitled].pdf; ATT00001.htm Please see below and I'll call you in five Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Ari Glass Date: March 4, 2013 12:19:50 PM EST To: Todd Meister Todd, As discussed, many parties initial reaction to a quick background or diligence check is the same as DBs. The reality is very different than the appearance. I had similar situations with other banks, and service providers. Both UBS and Morgan Stanley, after initially saying I did not pass compliance, did significant diligence on me, and after diligence, which included speaking to our outside counsel, who was able to show them various things, we got approved as a client. Even my old firm has over a billion dollars and gets approved after diligence. It's also important to note that these approvals were received prior to the previous cases described in the attached letter being dismissed. Since then they have been dismissed. Its important to note that case that generated the most headlines and had the greatest level of accusations against my former firm (Razorback), was settled for no money whatsoever. I have no doubt that if DB was willing to have a conversation with me followed by or simultaneous to a conversation with our consul we would be approved there as well. Most peoples diligence fails to discover for example that both the Razorback case and the US bankruptcy Trustee case are over and its outcomes highly favorable for the funds (details in the attached letter). The only case outstanding against me right now is a defamation or libel case from AJ Discala. There is no merit to the case to begin with , but certainly not against me or any entity I'm involved with. There isn't even a claim against me in the actual case, but I was thrown in due to association with my ex-partner. The lawyers are highly confident that this case will never get past a motion to dismiss. We have another case against TD Bank but we are claimants and not defendants in this case and expect it to be resolved shortly in a manner that makes our investors whole on their losses. The biggest investor I had in my prior firm is a large client of DB Private client group and are willing to act a s a strong reference for me with them if necessary. I have in the past and will continue in the future to answer any and all questions surrounding the Rothstein situation fully and honestly. I strongly suggest that he gets DB to get on a call with me and counsel and I am sure they will be satisfied soon thereafter. Lastly, I became aware on Friday but have not seen that there was another law suit filed against Platinum last week. Im told that it has no absolutely new allegations that were not made in prior law suits and that the lawyers fully expect it to not make it pass a motion to dismiss. I have not seen this lawsuit. Lastly, as a reminder, I have been out as a GP from Platinum for nearly 4 years at this point. To be clear, we can show everything objectively with no reliance on "he said, he said" necessary. Attached is the letter prepared by outside counsel for another party a while back. Regards Ari EFTA01145205 The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged, proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, copying, disclosure or distribution of all or any portion of this e-mail and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you received this e- mail in error, please notify the sender, permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments, and destroy all hard copies immediately. This communication should not be regarded as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to sell or purchase any security or other financial product. Boothbay and its related entities reserve the right to monitor and/or save all e-mail communications through their networks. EFTA01145206
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
09363e98438ff97d8772b87e77aedae2ee4d0667708f4ee447bd17590485818a
Bates Number
EFTA01145205
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!