EFTA01122181
EFTA01122183 DataSet-9
EFTA01122185

EFTA01122183.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 516 words document
P23 D4 D5 D2 V15
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
📄 Extracted Text (516 words)
CFN 20160083888 Filing # 38680745 E-Filed 03/07/2016 01:10:39 PM OR BK 28155 PG 1710 RECORDED 03/10/2016 15:39:22 Palm Beach County. Florida AMT Sharon R. Bock CLERK & COMPTROLLER Pgs 1710-1711; (2Pgs) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 2010CA019300 Division: AN Stephen A. Alexander, Plaintiff, vs. Michael T. Hardman, Defendant AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs Motion for Final Summary Judgment is scheduled for hearing on March 9, 2016. Based upon the pleadings, records, documents filed by counsel, and the agreement of the panics, the Court finds that Plaintiffs unopposed Motion for Final Summary Judgment should be GRANTED. The, C:ntr.: fin14/1.; tt at titer; g iss,lz of ir.ater;a1 with ti:ect to the following facts: 1. Plaintiff was the originating lender and has held the note attached as Exhibit "A" to the Motion for Summary Judgment since June 5, 2009; 2. The note was payable upon the sale, transfer, or assignment, or further encumbrance of any assets in which Michael T. Hardman, solely or as a tenant by the entirety has an interest. 3. The official records of Palm Beach County, Florida show that defendant transferred by special warranty deed certain real property to SGRK Properties, Inc. (a copy of such deed is attached as Exhibit "B" to the Motion for Summary Judgment). 4. Such official records also scow that defendant transferred by special warranty deed certain real property to Virginia Dicin (a copy of such deed is attached as Exhibit "C" to the Motion for Summary Judgment). Page ft 012 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL. SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK, 03/07/2016 01:10:39 PM EFTA01122183 CFN 20180083888 BOOK 28155 PAGE 1711 Case No. 50-2010-CA-019300-XXJCX-MB 2 OF 2 5. Defendant defaulted on the note by failing to satisfy the subject note upon the transfer of the Palm Beach County real property refetred to above. 6. There is no genuine issue of material fact as to plaintiff's right to enforce the subject note. 7. On or about July 5, 2010, demand for payment of the balance of the nate was made upon defendant by correspondence to his attorney. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Motion for Final Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: a.That Plaintiff recover it:drew:A against Defendant for $550,000.00 plus interest from June 5, 2009 at six percent (6%). b.That Deler.an. Ectlithis iz th s ection. c.The Court retains jurisdiction of this action to enter further orders, including but not limited to odors pertaining .2t.ttilktnent and amount of attorneys' fees and costs. case is on the tried calculi: for April 4, 2016 and by tnis Order, the parties have come to an agreement regarding the resolution of this matter. DONE and ORDERED in chambers, in "west Palm Beach, Paim Beach County, Florida, this 7th day of March, 2016. • r ; I 1 150;201A AT / f MCCC:n07201 1 .t. 7 zb,lie A _44ced4• 4_ coiritACatiiento_ :0.2010-CA-019300-XXXX.MB 0307/2016 Cheryl A. Cara:uzza Chug Judge Copies to: Mark n Defendant, The.Cull •I 71" " mary Email: Page 2 of 2 EFTA01122184
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
09d77a56a776fd52b09c164e40bd17f82c5d5c622a3728216dd7b24f5e354955
Bates Number
EFTA01122183
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Link copied!