EFTA01145285.pdf

Macro Skinny February 23. 2013 Stabilizing at healthy levels Global growth stabilizing at a healthy level. After five straight months of impressive monthly gains, the global manufacturing surveys are taking a breather the February manufacturing PMI was flat in Europe and a touch lower in the US. We had expected a downtick in the U.S. surveys (January 29'h Macro Skinny) as higher taxes and the impending budget sequestration temper business sentiment. So this weakness is nothing to get worried about. The European manufacturing survey was disappointingly flat, but the silver lining here is the improvement in both France and Germany (the Euro-area average was probably dragged down by Italy, perhaps in response to heightened election uncertainty). The bigger surprise was the collapse in Europe's services PMI. It does admittedly imply a more protracted recovery, but one should not dismiss the impressive progress seen in manufacturing activity in recent months, which tends to be a more reliable forward-looking measure of growth. Taken together, European growth is still on track to improve from a run rate of -2% late last year towards I% at the end of this year. It is an improvement, even if it's well below the pre-crisis trend of roughly 2%. Pending the February manufacturing surveys from the emerging markets, our best guess is for a global PMI index consistent with decent, 3.5% global GDP growth in the first quarter (left chart). The improvement in the global PMI from prior months is already showing up in the hard data. Global car sales, for example, have picked up sharply in recent months (right chart). Global PMIs consistent with a 3.5% "run rate" for world growth High frequency indicators of the global consumer holding up wog OoO annualized %change Millions of cars sold. sear 7 — Model-Implied (gbbalPMI) 68 6 —Actual world real GDP 66 - 6e - 4 62 - 60 2 58 r- 0 56 54 t999 2002 2005 2008 2011 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12 Jan-13 Source:J.P. Morgan PlEt Economcs. J.P.Morgan Sec unites LLC. Source:J.P. Morgan SecuritlesLI.C. US: focus on the other side of the valley. In the US there are early signs of the well-anticipated fiscal drag "finally" kicking in. Our view here hasn't changed — it's a temporary drag masking a faster growing private sector, which is why we're still looking for growth acceleration later in the year. For now, though, economic data will be noisy. On the consumer side, the January retail sales held up, but the hit to consumers from higher taxes (as well as gasoline prices) seem likely to appear in the February-March numbers. On the corporate side, the national ISM/PMI surveys across both services and manufacturing businesses continue to paint a solid picture for both production and Capex plans (left chart). A modest tentative drag from fiscal tightening is likely, and based on the regional Fed surveys, most of it will likely EFTA01145285 be concentrated in sequester-sensitive states.' Housing data may wobble2, too, but the fundamentals — of growing demand and shrinking supply (right chart) — support our view that sales activity, construction, and prices will continue to head higher. We would heavily discount any possible weakness in housing stemming from the drama in Washington regarding the sequestration (ongoing), the budget deal (next month), and the debt ceiling (in May). Capex plans increasing in the face of decal drag Tight housing supply supports construction and prices % balance. planned increase less decrease Inventory of existing homesf or sale.°/<, of households 4.0 30 3.5 20 10 3.0 0 2.5 - .10 2.0 - -20 2003 2004 2005 2C06 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1.5 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Note:Averageor Phty Fed and Empre State surveys. Source: Phily Fed.NY Fed. J.P. Morgan PBEconomics. Data as of February2013. Source: NAR.Census.J.P.1Aorgan P8 Econoincs.lks olJan 2013. Fed: expect more communication hiccups. The equity market did not like the January FOMC minutes earlier this week, which revealed that several participants suggested the Fed should "vary the pace of asset purchases...in response to changes in the economic outlook or as its evaluation of the efficacy and costs of such purchases evolved ". But this is not new; the Fed already put to rest notion of"QEternity" in the minutes to the previous FOMC meeting (January 19'h Macro Skinny). Rightly so, the bond market didn't budge this week, particularly when yields had already corrected upward quite a bit in prior months. More confusion from the Fed is unavoidable, but in our view the FOMC is unlikely to announce any material change to its Large-Scale Asset Purchases (LSAP) program over the next 3-6 months; the tax hikes and the sequester implementation will keep the labor market weak enough to keep the FOMC hawks at bay. That being said, we continue to assign a high likelihood that asset purchases end or are reduced by the end of the year. Even then, it is extremely unlikely that bond yields will snap up violently. Assuming conservatively that the Fed starts tightening in mid-2015, our Treasury valuation model' suggests that ending LSAP by year-end would lead to around a 35bp sell off — similar to what the bond market anticipates already (right chart). We saw a similar effect in advance of the fiscal cliff (October 26th Macro Skinny), where the Richmond Fed survey — which covers the states that are most exposed to sequestration — collapsed while the Kansas City Fed and the national Markit PMI were more robust. 2 Some recent measures of housing activity paused, but we see little reason for concern. Housing starts in January slowed month-on-month, but this was from a high rate of increase in December, and the weakness was entirely in the multifamily sector. The National Association of Homebuilders housing market index declined 1 point (to 46), but this index has steadily increased for more than a year (and is still near the highest levels since 2006). 3 Our model was based on a regression of 10-year Treasury yields on a constant, inflation expectations, and 3-year Treasury yields (the three year ratc replaces the usual policy rate. That's because the Fed's forward looking guidance on the zero policy rate from late 'II till late '12 effectively meant that the three year rate became the new policy rate). We used the regression coefficients to compute the fair value (excluding QE) 10-year Treasury yield in the fourth quarter of 2013 assuming inflation expectations remain constant at current levels, but the 1-year-ahead, 3- year Treasury yield increases in a way that is consistent with ow view on the future path of the federal funds rate. Our estimates showed the 10-year yield would increase by 35bps from current levels if the Fed stops its asset purchase program at the end of the year. 2 EFTA01145286  Sleek means Fed in no rush to hike Long-dated yields already priced to Increase gradually %of potential GDP 10-year Treasury yield.% 6 6 1.0 USOutput gap 4 1 as 2 3 Market-implied • 3.0 2 based on 015 •• 0 . •• 2.5 •• 0 1111111111111111111111 • -4 -1 2.0 Real fed funds -2 •6 -3 1.5 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source: J.P-Morgan PBEconorrpcs. IMF. FRB. Philly Fed. Source: FederalReserve Board. Bloomberg. More ECB/BOJ easing likely. Outside the US, monetary policy will likely ease further in two key economies. Japan: the G7 group signaled that competitive devaluation is legitimate provided it is implemented using domestic policy easing, as opposed to pushing for a weaker currency vis-a-vis foreign asset purchases. If Prime Minister Abe wants to show he can "walk the talk", without buying foreign bonds, the BoJ needs to seriously consider a Fed-style "twist" to its asset purchases program — shifting aggressively from short-maturities to much longer maturities. It is quite striking that in duration terms (measured in "10-yr equivalent" securities), the BoJ hasn't been buying much, certainly when compared to the Fed (left chan). Europe: the ECB will likely realize that monetary policy in the Euro-area is getting too tight, particularly when compared to the rest of the GI04. The strength of the Euro against the US dollar, the Sterling and the Yen indeed shows that the ECB is not easing enough on a global scale. But more fundamentally, loan rates in the periphery are still too high relative to Germany (right chart). More conventional easing (by lowering the ECB rate to 0.25%) would be a good start, but what Europe really needs is aggressive quantitative easing of the type that the Fed and the Bank of England delivered. The ECB does not appear ready to deliver a full-blown QE, but we may get there if the weakness in bank lending markets persists. This should help weaken the Euro and regulate the pace of private sector deleveraging. Lesson from the Fed: Bal needs to buy duration Easier monetary conditions slow to spill into real economy Central bank asset purchase programs (2009 - 2013) Lending rates on new 1-5 year loans to nonlinancials.% BIllions.USO TrIllions.JPY 7.0 !I! 4.030 mAgregale 400 .10-yr equivalents 350 6.5 3.5000 • 3.000 • 300 6.0 2500 • 250 5.5 2.003 200 1.503 iso 5.0 1.003 100 4.5 500 • 50 4.0 0 0 Federal Reserve Bank of Japan 3.5 Source Federal Rotative. BOJ. J P. Morgan PS Eco menet- Note: Fed 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 PaC frIZZer. of UST e. from'Oper :Icon TWr ff r 810 not counted in 'aggregate IIIC:ZUW. but do elfec t e '1O-y r equkalenkr. Source:European Central Bank. IMF. Aggregatesbased on PPP weights. True, the ECB has expanded its balance sheet, but that was a "credit easing" policy to awid a melt-down scenario. Like the UK and the US in 2010, monetary policy is too tight in the Euro-area (outside Germany, that is) so more standard QE expansion is needed. They don't seem to be keen on going this way now, but Draghi's recent comment that the Euro is important for "growth and price stability" is wry unusual (he put growth and price in the same sentence!). 3 EFTA01145287 The wall of global liquidity heads for emerging markets. Since growth in developed markets (DM) is still held back by debt deleveraging this year, emerging markets (EM) are going to drive global growth (left chart). That's because EM borrowing rates fell throughout last year, and now that global risk aversion has normalized too, the conditions for EM domestic demand re-acceleration are ripe. EM is already running at close to full capacity, yet the scope for a spike in EM inflation this year is limited. Growth is not the sole investment proposition EM has to offer; it's carry as well. EM-DM rate differentials have been quite high since 2009 (right chart), but what makes this theme particularly appealing right now is the scope for EM currency appreciation (being a cyclical asset class), along with declining currencyvolatility. Until not so long ago, emerging markets flourished at the start of each global liquidity cycle and popped when the Fed and other major central banks started to tighten monetary conditions. The tsunami of EM currency and debt crises in the 1990s is still echoing, particularly when put in the context of today's ferocious global liquidity glut. But in the 1990s, emerging markets were overfed with liquidity because EM currencies were fixed at "cheap" rates, and consequently overbought in the following years. Today, most EM currencies are allowed to appreciate which regulates the flow of hot money. It's not a surprise then that the Fed's tightening cycle of 2004-2006 didn't cause any pain in EM (on the contrary — it was the developed world that popped as global liquidity was withdrawn). Bottom line: EM offers interesting opportunities both in yield and in growth investments, yet it is a lot more resilient to sharp swings in capital flows. 'Esofficial: EM Is more than half of the world economy EM rata: the next stop In the hunt for yield Share of global GDP. ^/ Po icy rate, % 70 10 65 60 8 Emerging markets Forecast 55 6 50 45 4- 40 2 Developed markets 35 30 0 , 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Source: NE data and forecasts based on PPP weights. Source: J.P. Morgan PEtEconomics. radiate' central banks. Michael Vaknin Chief Economist, J.P. Morgan Private Bank Paul Eitelman Associate Economist, J.P. Morgan Private Bank Jeff Greenberg Associate Economist, J.P. Morgan Private Bank Acronyms: BoJ — Bank of Japan DM — Developed Markets ECB — European Central Bank EM — Emerging Markets FOMC — Federal Open Market Committee FRB — Federal Reserve Board IMF - International Monetary Fund ISM - Institute for Supply Management 4 EFTA01145288 NAR — National Association of Realtors PMI — Purchasing Managers Index PPP — Purchasing Power Parity QE — Quantitative Easing IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: .1PMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tar advice. Accordingly. any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained herein (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used in connection with the promotion. marketing or recommendation by anyone unaffiliated with!Morgan Chase & Co. ofany of the matters addressedherein orfor the purpose of avoiding U.S. tar-related penalties. Note that J.P. Morgan is not a licensed insurance provider. The material contained herein is intended as a general market commentary. Opinions expressed herein are those of Michael Vaknin and may differfrom those of other J.P. Morgan employees and affiliates. This information in no way constitutes J.P. Morgan research and should not be treated as such. Further. the views expressed herein may differfrom that contained in J.P. Morgan research reports. The above summary/prices/quotes/statistics have been obtainedfrom sources deemed to be reliable. but we do nor guarantee their accuracy or completeness. any yield referenced is indicative and subject to change. Past peifomiance is not a guarantee offuture results. References to the performance or character of our portfolios generally refer to our BalancedModel Portfolios constructed by J.P. Morgan. It is a praryfor client performance andmay not represent actual transactions or investments in client accounts. The model portfolio can be implemented across brokerage or managed accounts depending on the unique objectives of each client and is serviced through distinct legal entities licensedfor specific activities. Bank. trust and investment management services are provided by JP Morgan Chase Bank. NA. and its affiliates. Securities are offered through 1.P. Morgan Securities LW (Min Member NYSE F1NRA and S1PC. and its affiliates globally as local legislation permits. Securities products purchased or sold through JPMS are not insuredby the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"): are nor deposits or other obligations of its bank or Mgr affiliates and are nor guaranteed by its bank or thrift e7iliates: and are subject to investment risks. including passible loss of the principal invested. Not all investment ideas referenced are suitablefor all investors Speak with your J.P. Morgan Representative concerning your personal situation. This material is not intended as an der or solicitationfor the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Private Investments may engage in leveraging and other speculative practices that may increase the risk of investment loss. can be highly illiquid. are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuations to investors and may involve complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information. Typically such investment ideas can only be offered to suitable investors through a confidential offering memorandum which fully describes all term. conditions. and risks. This material is distributed with the understanding that J.P. Morgan is not rendering accounting. legal or tax advice. You should consult with your independent advisors concerning such matters. In the United Kingdom. this material is approved by J.P. Morgan International Bank limited (JPAIIB) with the registered office located at 25 Bank Street. Canary Wharf. London EN SIP. registered in England No. 03838766 and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. In addition. this material may be distributed by: JPMorgan Chase Bank. NA. (JPMCB) Paris branch. which is regulated by the French banking authorities Autorite de Controle Prudenriel and Autorite des Martha Financiers: J.P. Morgan (Suisse) S.A. regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority: JPAICB Bahrain branch. licensed as a conventional wholesale bank by the Central Bank of Bahrain (for professional clients only): JPMCB Dubai branch. regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. In Hong Kong. this material is distributed by JPMorgan Chase Bank. N.A. (JPAICB)Hong Kong branch except to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch and where this material relates to a Collective Investment Scheme (other than private funds such as private equity and hedge funds) in which case it it distributed by J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific)Iimited (JPMSAPL). Both JPMCB Hong Kong branch and .IPMSAPL are regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. In Singapore. this material is distributed by JPMCB Singapore branch except to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch and where this material relates to a Collective Investment Scheme (other than private funds such as a private equity and hedgefunds) in which case it is distributed by J.P. Morgan (SEA) Limited (JPMSEAL). Both .1PMCB Singapore branch and JPMSEAL are regulated by the Monetary Authority ofSingapore. This message has been prepared by personnel in the (Sales and Trading Departments)of one or more cffiliates ofIP. Morgan Chase & Co. and is not the product ofJ.P. Morgan's Research Department. Iris nor a research report and is not intended as such. This material is for the general information ofour clients and is a "solicitation- o* as that term is used within CFTC Rule 1.7! (a)(9)(v)and 23.605(a)(9)(v) promulgated under the U.S Commodity Exchange Act. Each recipient of this presentation. and each agent thereof may disclose to any person. without limitation. the US income andfranchise tax treatment and tax structure of the transactions described herein and may disclose all materials ofany kind (including opinions or other tar analyses) provided to each recipient insofar as the materials relate to a US income or franchise tar strategy provided to such recipient by JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries. Should you have any questions regarding the information contained in this material or about J.P. Morgan products and services. please contact your J.P. Morgan private banking representative. Additional information is available upon request. "JP. Morgan" is the marketing namefor JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide. This material may not be reproduced or circulated without J.P. Morgan's authority. 2013 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved 5 EFTA01145289