EFTA02000292
EFTA02000293 DataSet-10
EFTA02000295

EFTA02000293.pdf

DataSet-10 2 pages 434 words document
P17 V16 P19 V15
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (434 words)
Jeffrey, Just by way of update: i) pally Telearalin Still no response back from the Telegraph, which is, to say the least, unusual. I spoke to David Price, who appears more concerned about getting his account paid than becoming involved, but he did indicate that he had received no contact from the newspaper. While I appreciate that you do not want to be exposed to litigation, one option that might bear fruit would be a complaint to the PCC. Although we are technically outside the two months time limit, the PCC have a discretion to extend time where the complainant has been in contact with the newspaper concerned. The attraction about such a complaint is that we can adopt a two pronged approach in complaining not only about the inappropriate use of the word "paedophile", but also the newspaper's failure to acknowledge, never mind address, our complaint. If we were successful In having the complaint upheld, then this could be used as a basis to pressurise the Mail and other publishers to at least remove the offending online references. ii) Marie C/a/re rnaanine I'm still awaiting your approval to release my proposed response. iii) p of Y I haven't heard back from either her PR rep or solicitor, with both having given the impression that their client would be speaking to you direct with a view to breaking the impasse over the wording and distribution of the proposed letter. Have you had any word back from her? I look forward to hearing from you. Kind regards. Paul Paul Tweed Senior Partner Belfast I Dublin I London EFTA_R1_00496616 EFTA02000293 w: www.iohnsonslaw.com b: www.cikkallibeldebate.com httplIwww.sra.org.uktrules Paul Tweed is also a member of Paul Tweed LLP Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority Disclaimer: This e-mail transmission may be legally privileged but is, in any event, confidential and intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or disseminate the information in it, or take any action in reliance of it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Johnsons Solicitors. If you have received this message in error, do not open any attachment, but please notify the individual sender (above) deleting this message from your system. Please rely on your own virus check. While reasonable efforts are made to ensure that e-mails are free from bugs or virus infection, no responsibility is taken by Johnsons Solicitors for any damage arising from any bug or virus infection EFTA_R1_00496617 EFTA02000294
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
11cf2a27820c77eb500b989daa987d0e69bd24f7ed0a86cb12abe57615533e5d
Bates Number
EFTA02000293
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!