EFTA01140721.pdf

DataSet-9 7 pages 1,041 words document
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,041 words)
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION -AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMES NOW, the Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorney, and requests that this Court enter the proposed Order on Motion Summary Judgment attached hereto and as good grounds would show: 1. A hearing was held before the Court on January 27, 2014 regarding EPSTEIN's Motion for Summary Judgment. 2. The Court granted EPSTEIN's motion. 3. The Court directed the undersigned attorney to prepare a proposed order and directed that certain language be included in the order. 4. The undersigned obtained a transcript of the hearing and followed the direction of the court in preparing the proposed order attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 5. The attorney for Counter-Plaintiff has objected to the proposed order and suggested additional language to which Counter-Defendant cannot agree. EFTA01140721 CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB 6. It therefore becomes necessary that the court review portions of the transcript and the proposed order and enter an order that the Court deems appropriate. WHEREFORE, Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, requests that this Court enter an order regarding its ruling on Counter-Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by eservice to those listed on the attached Service List, this 4th day of February, 2014. /s/ W. Chester Brewer, Jr. W. CHESTER BREWER, JR. Florida Bar No.: 0261858 W. Chester Brewer, Jr., P.A. Attorney for Counter-Defendant Suite 1400 250 Australian Avenue South West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephon Facsimile: Primary email: Secondary email: EFTA01140722 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800)OOOCMB-AG 11 - Searcy Denney Scarola et 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 ury, .-rger eiss, 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esquire 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 I • uderdalc FL 33301 Bmdle 3. Edwards Esquire Es i Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Ton'a Iladdad Coleman Es uire aw ices o onja 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA01140723 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION -AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER GRANTING COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE came before the court on Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, Motion for Summary Judgment regarding the Fourth Amended Counterclaim filed herein by Counter- Plaintiff and the court having reviewed the file and applicable precedent, having heard argument of counsel and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereupon ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Mr. EPSTEIN filed suit against Mr. EDWARDS and Mr. EDWARDS thereafter filed a Counterclaim against Mr. EPSTEIN. Mr. EPSTEIN later dismissed his Complaint without prejudice. The Counterclaim proceeded and went through several amendments. The Fourth Amended Counterclaim at issue here contains two causes of action. Those ro uses of action are abuse of process and malicious prosecution. 2. The issue before the court is whether the absolute litigation privilege applies to causes EXHIBIT "A" EFTA01140724 CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMI3 of action for both abuse of process and malicious prosecution. 3. The court has reviewed Levin, Middlebxooks. Moves & Mitchell. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co, 639 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Echevarria, McCalla. Rayner. Barrett & Franpier v. Cole. 950 So2d 380 (Fla. 2007) and Wolfe v. Foreman, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Dl 540 (July 17, 2013). The court finds these cases to be not only persuasive but binding. The court is bound by the holding of Levin, that all actions occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding, so long as the act has some relation to the proceeding, are absolutely privileged. This proposition was reaffirmed in Echevanda. The Third District Court of Appeal in Wolfe, quoting in large part from Echevarria, found specifically that the litigation privilege applies to malicious prosecution claims and acts occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding, if those acts bear some relation to the proceeding. 4. During the hearing on this matter, it was conceded by counsel for Counter-Plaintiff that all of the allegations made in both the abuse of process claim and the malicious prosecution claim are of acts occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding and bear sonic relation to the proceeding. 5. The court therefore finds that the absolute privilege applies to both the abuse of process claim and malicious prosecution claims made herein. 6. The Counter-Plaintiff urged the court that Olson v. Johnson, 961 So.2d 356 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), is in conflict with Wolfe and that this conflict would allow this court to "peruse" other issues. However, the court finds Olson inapplicable because that case dealt with extra judicial false statements that were made to a police officer. The statements were not made during the course of a EFTA01140725 CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB judicial proceeding and were therefore not privileged. For the reasons stated above, the Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of , 2014. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Copies furnished to those on the attached service list. EFTA01140726 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. W. Chester Brewer, Jr., Es uirc vvebliwitala wcbc W. Chester Brewer, Jr., 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola et al 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esquire i uoldberaer(Oaawpa.com; Atterbury, Goldberger & Weir 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurilc, Esquire 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33301 Bmc ards..i re Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fred Iiadda Es uire 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tonja c nan Esquire tonic t refil Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 7° Street, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA01140727
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
133efb37192dbfeef1512f680928b4eda31cbf87a8ba19478106c03686be7f56
Bates Number
EFTA01140721
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
7

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!