📄 Extracted Text (1,145 words)
From:
To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re:
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:20:16 +0000
Importance: Normal
I did not charge a "premium". I simply charged for every hour I was away from my family. Until you mentioned
it, I never heard of any 8 hour limitation for out of town trips.I will be happy to check this with billing partners at
law firms.
Sent via BlackBeny by AT&T
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 05:50:11 -0400
To:
This is the bill that you said never happened, - time billed for a day, always has a max especially at out of
town rates. ,As you know I never looked at your bills, nor questioned them. If you decided to charge a
premium for a disruptive trip or disruptive day it would be a new concept . Here is a non holiday bill.
From: Carolyn Cohen [mailt
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2
To: Rich Kahn
i
Subject: Amended Dcrshowitz bill
THany . but i Dear Rich — Turns out that Alan's arithmetic mistake may have included an element of a
Freudian slip. He forgot to include $1,312.40 of expenses (Jeffrey flew him down to Florida, but Alan paid for
his trip back.) Accordingly, the corrected bill is below:
Jan. 6, 2008
Attention: Rich Kahn:
Bill for services rendered in regard to Jeffrey Epstein:
December 11 — Jan. 6, 2008:
74.25 hours @ $1150 per hour: $83,387.50
20.5 hours @1500 (12/14 trip to Florida) 30,750.00
Expenses — (return flight from Florida): 1,312.40
Total: $115,449.90
Sony for the confusion.
EFTA00771097
Thank you,
Alan Dershowitz
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:51 PM wrote:
On nov 21 2007,the day before Thanksginig, I cancelled a major family get together to travel to Fla for you. I
left home, accrding to my calender at Sam and did not get back until after 10 pm. I do not think a fee of
$25500 is unreasonable for such a disruptive trip. It is what I would charge any other client. If there was an
objection, it could have been raised at the time. I believe you would have agreed it was reasonable at the time.
My wife confirms that she and I told Beller several times that we could not a bill for Jan 2007 and he should
look for his copy. No matter how many times Beller asked for this bill, we don't have it as we made clear from
his first request. I think it is also in writing and I'm looking for it.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Da -0400
To:
Sub ec :
Jeffrey,
I am sorry that Dershowitz is angry with me , He has presented many claims that are obviously incorrect . The
attached being a prime example. You will find the exact two bills that you said Dershowitz categorically said
, " never happened". he billed 3 to five times more than anyone else for this one trip alone . This type of
obvious misstatement causes me great concern. In addition I have reviewed my files, again contrary to what
he has represented there is NO letter showing 67 hours for 09. . certainly no backup, to that number , as i said
there is one as of April for 23 hrs. As he is your friend you have decided to accept his claimed hours , no
matter what the corresponding e mail traffic illustrates. I have asked for back up for months now for the
178,000 payment , nov 06 and dec , I am ignored and told that they have spent a great deal of time
accumulating all the info. , but never received any , not one scrap of paper on this issue , why? as there are
only 14 e mails for the month. your projections in Nov 06 , said that Alan was ill, and then leaving for Europe ,
so I expected a small bill. He has not provided me with one piece of useful backup. the three pages I sent you
of a small book with illegible scribbles. was the only pages , again contrary to his representation we have
received to date as a detailed backup. I checked and again contrary to what you told me he said , we only
received these three pages I have enclosed the fax heading and . That being said , no one in the office can
make heads nor tails of it. It did not even come with a summary or explanation. Every other attorney provided
detailed bills usually the next day upon request, items and issues discussed, matters handled ,time spent. With
the proposition that it would be unethical to reduce his fees because a criminal matter should not be
contingent, I point out that the others merely adjusted their billed hours , no one had a contingency agreement
of any type, and if you like I can check with the ethics committee of the bar on a no names basis, if it is proper
for a criminal lawyer to adjust his bill. . You are simply being asked to accept his number of hours because you
are friends, not because of requested documentation for over three million dollars. My job as your accountant
is to verify bills. You can readily see that Florida alone , only two days. was already a thirty thousand dollar
Dershowitz mistake . I realize that you are made to feel as you are questioning his integrity by asking him to
provide what others have done and with little squabble. That is your prerogative. He has referenced " my
numbers" , however I only have what he has given me, and it is far in excess of every other bill. If I can
answer any other questions . please remember I will be out for the rest of the week.
Harry
EFTA00771098
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
EFTA00771099
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
133ff73b544789df0bbd75075676c46f70fe2924f61a954076ecbaa158e97841
Bates Number
EFTA00771097
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0