podesta_email_01541.txt

podesta-emails 81,050 words email

V11 P19 D6 P24 V16

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *H4A News Clips* *July 5, 2015* *TODAY’S KEY STORIES..................................................................................... **5* Hillary Clinton Reassures Gay Youth in Viral Facebook Photo // NYT // Liam Stack – July 4, 2015 5 Hillary Clinton Accuses China of Hacking U.S. Computers // Reuters – July 4, 2015.................. 6 *SOCIAL MEDIA................................................................................................. **8* Dan Merica (7/4/15, 6:43 AM) - Many ppl in Gorham seem genuinely impressed HRC is traveling this far north for the 4th in NH, say they haven't had many 2016 visits......................................................... 8 Bill Clinton (7/4/15, 9:24 AM) - 239 years later, the United States of America is still in the future business. Happy Independence Day everyone! #4thofjuly...................................................................... 8 *HRC NATIONAL COVERAGE............................................................................. **8* Protesters Challenge Hillary Clinton During Parade in New Hampshire // NYT // Maggie Haberman – July 4, 2015...................................................................................................................................... 8 Clinton, Bush struggle to shed dynasty labels during holiday parades in N.H. // WaPo // Philip Rucker & Ed O’Keefe – July 4, 2015............................................................................................................ 9 Clinton campaign gives new meaning to the term ‘rope line’ at New Hampshire parade // WaPo // Vanessa Williams – July 4, 2015......................................................................................................... 12 Bernie and Hillary's holiday weekend // Politico // Annie Karni & Jonathan Topaz – July 4, 2015 13 Clinton goes after a Bush in New Hampshire // CNN // Dan Merica – July 4, 2015................... 15 Clinton campaign corrals media // Dan Merica // CNN – July 4, 2015...................................... 17 Who Clinton was looking for in New Hampshire // CNN // Cassie Spodak – July 4, 2015........... 19 Clinton has strong words on Chinese hacking // CNN // Dan Merica & Mariano Castillo – July 5, 2015 20 Hillary Clinton Reporters Kept Behind Moving Rope Line At New Hampshire Parade // ABC News // Liz Kreutz – July 4, 2015............................................................................................................. 21 Clinton defends progressive record as campaigns hit Independence Day // The Guardian // Jana Kasperkevic – July 4, 2015....................................................................................................................... 22 Hillary Clinton Says She Will Be Better Friend than Obama to Israel // Jewish Press // Tzvi Ben-Gedalyahu – July 4, 2015.......................................................................................................................... 24 From Clinton, a multi-generational message in N.H. // Boston Globe // Monica Disare – July 4, 2015 25 Hillary Clinton Comments On Viral ‘Humans of New York’ Photo // TIME // Dan Stewart – July 4, 2015 27 Hillary Clinton Has The Top Comment On This Heartbreaking “Humans Of New York” Photo // Buzzfeed // David Mack – July 4, 2015.................................................................................................... 28 Hillary Clinton accuses China of 'stealing US secrets' // BBC – July 4, 2015............................. 28 Union chief defends Hillary amid Bernie Sanders uprising // New York Post // Geoff Earle – July 4, 2015 29 Clinton, Chafee celebrate Fourth of July in the Granite State // WMUR9 // Kristen Carosa – July 4, 2015 30 Hillary Clinton tells supporters in Virginia that ‘love triumphed’ in gay marriage // Sentinel Republic // Alan Binder – July 4, 2015............................................................................................................ 30 Hillary Clinton shrugs off heckler while GOP candidates meet voters in New Hampshire, Iowa for Fourth of July campaigning // NY Daily News // Dennis Slattery – July 4, 2015..................................... 32 Clinton hears cheers and jeers // New Hampshire Union Leader // John Koziol – July 4, 2015. 33 *OTHER DEMOCRATS NATIONAL COVERAGE................................................. **34* *DECLARED................................................................................................. **34* *O’MALLEY............................................................................................... **34* Sanders, O’Malley race to be the Clinton alternative // WaPo // John Wagner – July 4, 2015... 34 Martin O’Malley finishes three-day tour in Clinton, Iowa // WQAD8 // Caroline Reinwald – July 4, 2015 37 *SANDERS................................................................................................ **38* Bernie Sanders Outpaces Martin O’Malley as Hillary Clinton Alternative // WSJ // Peter Nicholas and Colleen Mccain Nelson - July 5, 2015................................................................................................. 38 Sanders snags key endorsement in New Hampshire // CNN // Cassie Spodak – July 4, 2015.... 40 Bernie Sanders Gains on Clinton in Early-State Polls, Hits Iowa Patriotic Parade Circuit // Slate // Beth Ethier – July 4, 2015....................................................................................................................... 41 Sanders encouraged by Iowa crowds, rising polls // Des Moines Register // Kevin Hardy – July 4, 2015 42 ‘Feel the Bern’: Activists spearhead Bernie Sanders social push // MSNBC // Eric Levitz – July 4, 2015 44 Our Bernie Sanders moment: This July 4, remember only true independence and revolution ever brings change // Salon // Patrick L. Smith – July 4, 2015.................................................................. 47 The Times Doctrine on Bernie Sanders // HuffPo // David Bromwich – July 4, 2015................. 51 Bernie Sanders Sets A 2016 Record By Drawing A Huge Overflow Crowd In Iowa // Politicus // Jason Easley – July 4, 2015.......................................................................................................................... 54 How Bernie Sanders threatens to derail Hillary’s coronation // NY Post // Michael Goodwin – July 5, 2015............................................................................................................................................ 55 *WEBB...................................................................................................... **58* Jim Webb Announces Presidential Bid; Only Democratic Candidate Opposed To Marriage Equality // On Top // Carlos Santoscoy – July 4, 2015......................................................................................... 58 *CHAFEE................................................................................................... **59* Chafee's campaign leaves some NH Democrats a bit puzzled // Miami Herald // Michelle R. Smith – July 4, 2015..................................................................................................................................... 59 *UNDECLARED............................................................................................ **60* *BIDEN...................................................................................................... **60* The Joe Biden (mini-)boom // Pittsburgh Post-Gazette // David M. Shribman – July 5, 2015.. 60 *GOP................................................................................................................. **63* *DECLARED................................................................................................. **63* *BUSH....................................................................................................... **63* Indignant Jeb Bush Says He Takes Donald Trump’s Remarks Personally // NYT // Patrick Healy – July 4, 2015............................................................................................................................................ 63 Bush: ‘Absolutely’ offended by Trump’s comments on Mexicans // WaPo // Ed O’Keefe – July 4, 2015 64 Jeb Bush: Trump comments meant 'to draw attention' // CNN // Ashley Killough – July 5, 2015 65 Jeb Bush’s Giving Totaled 1.5% of Income From 2007 to 2013 // The Bell Jar – July 5, 2015..... 67 Jeb Bush, Married To Mexican, Denounces Donald Trump, Takes 'Ugly' Remarks About Immigrants Personally // International Business Times // Elizabeth Whitman – July 4, 2015.................... 68 Polls Show Jeb Bush In Good Standing To Win The GOP Nomination // Inquisitr – July 5, 2015 69 *RUBIO...................................................................................................... **70* Trump fires back at Rubio after ICE says suspected killer was deported 5 times // Washington Times // Kellan Howell – July 4, 2015........................................................................................................... 70 Trump hammers Rubio: ‘Zero credibility,’ ‘outright lies’ to sell amnesty // Breitbart News // Matthew Boyle – July 4, 2015.......................................................................................................................... 71 *PAUL........................................................................................................ **74* Don’t dismiss Rand Paul’s tax plan // Dallas News // Scott Burns – July 4, 2015...................... 74 *CRUZ........................................................................................................ **76* Ted Cruz: ‘Asinine’ to pull reruns of ‘The Dukes of Hazzard’ // WaPo // Katie Zezima – July 4, 2015 76 GOP presidential candidate Cruz wasn’t always ‘Ted’ // Star-Telegram // Maria Recio & Anna M. Tinsley – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................. 77 Cruz defends Trump: ‘Washington cartel’ doesn’t want illegal immigration debate // Washington Times // Kellan Howell – July 4, 2015................................................................................................. 79 Ted Cruz Calls For US To Quit UN Human Rights Council After Vote Condemning Israel // International Business Times // Mark Hanrahan – July 4, 2015.................................................................. 80 Ted Cruz Is Right to Call for Retention Elections for the Supreme Court // National Review //Andrrew C. McCarthy – July 4, 2015....................................................................................................... 80 *CHRISTIE................................................................................................ **83* Christie slams Obama on Iran, hedges on breaking nuclear deal // Politico // Ben Schreckinger – July 4, 2015........................................................................................................................................... 83 Christie Won’t Pledge to Undo Iran Deal // TIME // Zeke J Miller – July 4, 2015..................... 84 Christie makes nice on the trail in New Hampshire // USA Today // Bob Jordan – July 4, 2015 85 Chris Christie: King of the 2016 long shots // Burlington County Times // Jonathan Bernstein – July 4, 2015........................................................................................................................................... 87 Green Pressure Applied Against Christie on Cap and Trade as He Enters Presidential Fray // The Blaze // Kevin Mooney – July 4, 2015................................................................................................ 88 Christie campaign surges ahead on road to failure // Las Vegas Sun // Jonathan Bernstein – July 4, 2015 91 In N.H., Christie says he’s ‘Telling It Like It Is’ // Boston Globe // James Pindell – July 4, 2015 92 Here's Chris Christie's big problem in a nutshell // Business Insider // Brett Logiurato – July 4, 2015 94 Christie enters the race: Swinging for the fence // North Jersey // Matthew Hale – July 4, 2015 96 For Chris Christie, Freedom Means Nothing Left to Lose as New Jersey Voters Want Him to Resign // Politicus // Sarah Jones – July 4, 2015................................................................................................ 98 *PERRY..................................................................................................... **99* New Hampshire Republicans Not Ruling Perry Out // Texas Tribune // Abby Livingston – July 4, 2015 99 Report: Perry Emerges as Trump's Biggest Critic Among GOP Rivals // Newsmax // Todd Beamon – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................... 101 *GRAHAM............................................................................................... **102* Republican presidential candidate Lindsey Graham has a stark warning for the US // Business Insider // Maxwell Tani – July 4, 2015................................................................................................ 102 Graham sees 'perfect storm' from terror // Union Leader // Dan Tuohy – July 4, 2015............ 103 *HUCKABEE........................................................................................... **104* Mike Huckabee Vows To Prosecute Attacks Against Gay Marriage Opponents As Hate Crimes // On Top - July 4, 2015............................................................................................................................... 104 *FIORINA................................................................................................ **105* Lt. governor offers support to Fiorina // Journal Gazette // Niki Kelly & Brian Francisco – July 5, 2015 105 *JINDAL.................................................................................................. **106* Bobby Jindal: The son of immigrants and new champion of the tough-on-immigrants crowd // WaPo // Janell Ross – July 4, 2015.............................................................................................................. 106 Bobby Jindal expresses optimism about his future in Iowa // Des Moines Register // Maya Kliger – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................... 110 Jindal poses with gun at campaign stop, met with online mockery // Statesman // July 4, 2015 111 Bobby Jindal’s former media director brands him ‘anti-gay’ and ‘destructive’ // Pink News // Nick Duffy – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................ 111 Bobby Jindal Sued Over Anti-Gay Executive Order // Edge Media Network // John Reilly – July 4, 2015 112 Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal governs via cellphone // The Advocate // Mark Ballard & Marsha Shuler – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................... 113 *TRUMP................................................................................................... **116* Mitt Romney Criticizes Donald Trump for Comments on Mexican Immigrants // NYT // Maggie Haberman – July 4, 2015......................................................................................................................... 116 NASCAR is the latest brand to dump Donald Trump // AP // July 4, 2015.............................. 116 GOP worries about Donald Trump fallout // CNN // Chris Moody – July 4, 2015..................... 117 Trump stands by statements on Mexican illegal immigrants, surprised by backlash // Fox News – July 4, 2015.......................................................................................................................................... 119 Trump comes up top in 'poll of polls' of Republican voters - despite growing backlash over his anti-immigrant comments // Daily Mail // Christopher Brennan – July 4, 2015............................................. 120 Republicans cast into turmoil as Donald Trump rides the populist surge // Telegraph // Philip Sherwell – July 5, 2015................................................................................................................................ 121 Donald Trump Immigration: Panama Leaves Miss Universe Pageant, Protesting Offensive Comments About Mexicans // International Business Times // Elizabeth Whitman – July 4, 2015.................... 124 Fox Panelist Rips Trump: ‘Negotiate with Mexico? He Can’t Even Negotiate with Macy’s!’ // Mediaite // Josh Feldman - July 4, 2015....................................................................................................... 124 Donald Trump's contracts with the city protected under the First Amendment, civil liberties lawyer says // New York Daily News // Erin Durkin & Celeste Katz – July 4, 2015........................................ 125 Trump Says Comments on Mexicans Have Hurt Business // Bloomberg // Ben Brody – July 4, 2015 127 *UNDECLARED........................................................................................... **127* *WALKER................................................................................................ **127* Walker to drop open records restrictions in Wisconsin // The Hill // Mark Hensch – July 4, 2015 127 To Celebrate the Fourth, Scott Walker's GOP Declares Secrecy // HuffPo // Mary Bottari – July 4, 2015 128 Scott Walker, Republican leaders remove open records restrictions from Wisconsin budget // The Capital Times // Jason Joyce – July 4, 2015..................................................................................... 132 Wisconsin Open Records Law: Gov Scott Walker, Likely 2016 Candidate, Backtracks On Attempts To Limit Public Access To Records // International Business Times - Clark Mindock – July 4, 2015...... 133 Democrats underestimate Scott Walker at their own peril // Burlington County Times // Gene Lyons – July 5, 2015................................................................................................................................... 134 Politics of immigration take root in Walker's hometown // Journal Sentinel // Mary Spicuzza – July 5, 2015.......................................................................................................................................... 136 *KASICH.................................................................................................. **142* For Ohio Gov. John Kasich, "Win with Jeb and John" has a nice -- even plausible – ring // Cleveland // Thomas Suddes – July 5, 2015............................................................................................. 142 Ohio education officials: Kasich vetoes likely mean less funding for some school districts // Hudson Hub Times // Marc Kovac – July 5, 2015...................................................................................... 143 *OTHER................................................................................................... **145* New Hampshire Voters Bemoan Size of G.O.P. Field // NYT // Patrick Healy & Maggie Haberman – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................... 145 Sleepover at Mitt's: Christie, Rubio bunk with Romney at N.H. retreat // CNN // Cassie Spodak – July 4, 2015.......................................................................................................................................... 148 ObamaCare win turns up heat on GOP presidential field // The Hill // Peter Sullivan and Sarah Ferris – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................... 149 The GOP’s pathetic crybaby agenda: Trump, Scalia and the whiny, paranoid new face of the right // Salon // Bill Curry – July 5, 2015....................................................................................................... 152 *OTHER 2016 NEWS........................................................................................ **158* Facing a Selfie Election, Presidential Hopefuls Grin and Bear It // NYT // Jeremy W. Peters and & Ashley Parker – July 4, 2015........................................................................................................... 159 Voters are shifting to Democrats, flashing a warning for Republicans // WaPo // Dan Balz - July 4, 2015 161 Presidential candidates campaign in July Fourth parades // AP // Kathleen Ronayne – July 4, 2015 164 Presidential hopefuls discuss patriotism on July 4th // Des Moines Register – July 4, 2015.... 166 Candidates do holiday march through New Hampshire // USA Today // David Jackson – July 4, 2015 171 *OPINIONS/EDITORIALS/BLOGS.................................................................... **172* Wirthman: Hillary Clinton's everyday feminism // The Denver Post // Lisa Wirthman – July 4, 2015 172 Editorial: Hillary Clinton’s emails erode transparency claim // The Des Moines Register – July 4, 2015 175 Fair pay for hard work is not just happy talk // The Columbus Dispatch // E.J. Dionne – July 5, 2015 175 Hillary Clinton takes the knocks but keeps on trucking // Sydney Morning Herald // Annabel Crabb – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................... 177 Emotional decisions and Hillary Clinton's presidential bid (Your letters) // Syracuse // Max Malikow – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................... 178 *TOP NEWS..................................................................................................... **179* *DOMESTIC................................................................................................. **179* Gay rights activists in Philadelphia mark landmark march from 1965 // WaPo // Natalie Pompilio – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................... 179 Fatal shooting in San Francisco ignites immigration policy debate // LA Times // Louis Sahagun and Emily Alpert Reyes – July 4, 2015................................................................................................. 180 *INTERNATIONAL..................................................................................... **183* Day of Reckoning for Greek Banks and Eurozone’s Central Banker // NYT // Jacl Ewing & James Kanter – July 5, 2015............................................................................................................................... 183 Spurned by the West, Georgians look to Russia despite past quarrels // WaPo // Michael Birnbaum – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................... 186 Iran Nuclear Talks Appear to Advance as Deadline Nears // WSJ // Jay Solomon & Laurence Norman – July 4, 2015................................................................................................................................... 188 *TODAY’S KEY STORIES* *Hillary Clinton Reassures Gay Youth in Viral Facebook Photo <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/05/us/politics/hillary-clinton-reassures-gay-youth-in-viral-facebook-photo.html> // NYT // Liam Stack – July 4, 2015* Hillary Rodham Clinton offered moral support to a distraught gay youth who shared his anxiety about his future in a viral photograph posted on the Humans of New York Facebook page, telling him on Friday that it would be “amazing.” The boy, who is not named in the photo, is shown frowning and holding his head in his hands while sitting on a stoop. “I’m homosexual, and I’m afraid about what my future will be and that people won’t like me,” he said, according to the caption. Two hours after the picture was posted, Mrs. Clinton typed out some words of encouragement and signed her comment “H,” indicating that it was written by her and not by a member of her staff. “Prediction from a grown-up: Your future is going to be amazing,” she wrote. “You will surprise yourself with what you’re capable of and the incredible things you go on to do. Find the people who love and believe in you — there will be lots of them.” Kristina Schake, Clinton’s deputy communications director, took a screen shot of the comment and shared it on Twitter shortly after it was written. Humans of New York is no stranger to viral content. Its posts, often showcasing the quirkier side of life in New York City, have been viewed millions of times and have inspired imitators in cities and countries around the world, including Syria; Mumbai, India; and Tehran. But the nature of Friday’s post — a young gay person who appeared little more than a child, and Mrs. Clinton’s comforting response — gave it a lightning-in-a-bottle charge that helped it spread rapidly. Within 24 hours, it had been liked by more than 530,000 people and shared over 47,000 times, with more than 33,000 people scrolling through the comment thread to like Mrs. Clinton’s response. Mrs. Clinton has made support for gay people one of the cornerstones of her presidential campaign. Two days before the Supreme Court ruled last month that same-sex marriage is a constitutional right, her campaign released a video that featured a montage of same-sex weddings. “Some have suggested that gay rights and human rights are separate and distinct, but in fact, they are one and the same,” she said in the video. “Being L.G.B.T. does not make you less human.” Gay rights organizations scored a major victory with the Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage, but significant challenges remain, they say. Discrimination is still an issue, and many young people face isolation and hostility from their families and communities. According to the Trevor Project, a suicide prevention organization, lesbian, gay and bisexual young people are four times more likely than their straight peers to attempt suicide, and roughly a quarter of transgender youth report having made at least one suicide attempt. *Hillary Clinton Accuses China of Hacking U.S. Computers <http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-accuses-china-hacking-us-computers-350272> // Reuters – July 4, 2015* GLEN, N.H. (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton accused China on Saturday of stealing commercial secrets and "huge amounts of government information," and of trying to "hack into everything that doesn't move in America." Clinton's language on China appeared to be far stronger than that usually used by President Barack Obama's Democratic administration. Speaking at a campaign event in New Hampshire, Clinton said she wanted to see China's peaceful rise. "But we also have to be fully vigilant, China's military is growing very quickly, they're establishing military installations that again threaten countries we have treaties with, like the Philippines because they are building on contested property," said Clinton, who was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. "They're also trying to hack into everything that doesn't move in America. Stealing commercial secrets ... from defense contractors, stealing huge amounts of government information, all looking for an advantage," she said. Clinton is the front-runner to win the Democratic nomination for the November 2016 presidential election. Asked about the remarks, a White House official declined to comment. In the most recent case involving suspicions of Chinese hacking, Obama administration officials have said China is the top suspect in the massive hacking of a U.S. government agency that compromised the personnel records of at least 4.2 million current and former government workers. China has denied hacking into the computers of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. IRAN AND PUTIN Clinton also addressed the current talks over Iran's nuclear program and had strong words for Tehran. She said that even if a deal is reached with Iran, Tehran's "aggressiveness will not end" and it will remain a principal state sponsor of terrorism. Clinton said she hoped that "a strong verifiable deal" would be reached at talks in Vienna between world powers and Iran. But she added that even with an agreement, "They will continue to be the principal state sponsor of terrorism. They will continue to destabilize governments in the region and beyond. They will continue to use their proxies like Hezbollah. And they will continue to be an existential threat to Israel." The United States, other world powers and Iran have set a July 7 deadline to reach a deal to curb Tehran's nuclear program in exchange for a lifting of sanctions that have crippled Iran's economy. At the campaign event, Clinton also said the United States has to be "much smarter" about how it deals with Russian President Vladimir Putin's territorial ambitions. She said Putin's moves to expand Russia's boundaries, such as the annexation of Crimea last year, posed a challenge for the United States but she touted her experience as America's chief diplomat. She noted that because of NATO members' agreement to protect fellow members, had Ukraine been a member of NATO when Crimea was annexed, "that would have caused us to have to respond." She added on Putin: "I've dealt with him. I know him. He's not an easy man ... But I don't think there is any substitute other than constant engagement." *SOCIAL MEDIA* *Dan Merica (7/4/15, 6:43 AM)* <https://twitter.com/danmericaCNN/status/617327821573214208>* - Many ppl in Gorham seem genuinely impressed HRC is traveling this far north for the 4th in NH, say they haven't had many 2016 visits.* *Bill Clinton (7/4/15, 9:24 AM)* <https://twitter.com/billclinton/status/617323052771221504>* - 239 years later, the United States of America is still in the future business. Happy Independence Day everyone! #4thofjuly* *HRC** NATIONAL COVERAGE* *Protesters Challenge Hillary Clinton During Parade in New Hampshire <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/04/protesters-challenge-clinton-during-parade-in-new-hampshire/> // NYT // Maggie Haberman – July 4, 2015* Hillary Rodham Clinton made her first visit of the campaign to northern New Hampshire on Saturday, marching in a Fourth of July parade alongside dozens of her supporters and, for the first time since she became a candidate, being met by a handful of persistent protesters. Mrs. Clinton walked in front of a large sign with her campaign logo at the parade in Gorham, N.H., and a group of supporters chanted her name as they walked along. People along the sidewalks called out “Hillary!” to her on Main Street, urging her to shake their hands. But there was other chanting as well, from a tall man on the sidelines who carried a sign that read “Benghazi” with red paint stains on it. “Carpetbagger!” he called out repeatedly, a charge leveled against Mrs. Clinton when she first ran for the Senate in 2000 (and not used much since). He was joined by a half-dozen other protesters who followed her along the route in the working-class area, trying repeatedly to get her attention. “Where were you at 3 o’clock in the morning when the phone rang!” the man yelled. “Tell us about when you were poor!” A handful of Clinton volunteers eventually drifted toward the sidewalks, chanting her name in an effort to drown the protesters out. Mrs. Clinton never acknowledged them, as she took pictures with a group of beauty queens and stopped to talk to a wounded Marine, injured in Iraq, who was in a wheelchair and could not communicate. “He can understand everything you say to him,” Nellie Bagli said of her 40-year-old son, Jose, who was seriously wounded in March 2006. “I can see that in his eyes,” Mrs. Clinton said. Ms. Bagli told reporters she lives in Florida and that the cooler climate of New Hampshire benefits her son’s health. She is unsure of whether she will support Mrs. Clinton, she said, adding that after what her son had gone through, “it’s hard to believe” what politicians say. Mrs. Clinton’s aides, in what they said was an effort to allow voters to reach her freely without her being surrounded by a mass of reporters, kept the dozen journalists covering the event behind a length of rope carried by two campaign aides. When the parade ended, Mrs. Clinton held up her hands in a shrug when asked whether the protesters were jarring. At another point, she was asked the same question and said, “I’m just having a good time meeting everybody.” Aides said they selected the location for Mrs. Clinton’s Fourth of July event because she had not visited the region yet during the campaign, and other parades were in parts of the state she had traveled to already. Later, Mrs. Clinton made an unscheduled stop to the Northland Dairy Bar in nearby Berlin, which was fairly empty. She chatted with the patrons there, before heading toward a corner table. There were slices of pie waiting for her. “O.K., you guys are not gonna film me eating,” Mrs. Clinton said, laughing, as she urged the reporters who were there to move on. “This is not newsworthy. Take a picture of me standing here in front of these great pies by myself. It’s a headline! It’s a headline.” *Clinton, Bush struggle to shed dynasty labels during holiday parades in N.H. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-and-bush-struggle-to-shed-dynasty-labels-in-nh-parades/2015/07/04/93173942-2285-11e5-84d5-eb37ee8eaa61_story.html> // WaPo // Philip Rucker & Ed O’Keefe – July 4, 2015* GORHAM, N.H. — For Hillary Rodham Clinton, walking in Saturday’s Fourth of July parade in this mountain hamlet was supposed to showcase the sometimes-stiff candidate as accessible and in touch with the people — a champion for everyday Americans, as the Democratic presidential front-runner likes to put it. But the image Clinton projected during this rare glimpse as a candidate away from the podium seemed to reinforce how very different she is from the voters she was courting. She marched briskly down Main Street in a cocoon of campaign staffers and Secret Service agents. Hecklers followed her, shouting epithets. The former secretary of state enthusiastically shook hands and exchanged pleasantries with supporters — “Good to see you!” “I need your vote.” “Let’s make it happen!” — but only occasionally slowed down to chat, such as when aides directed her to a Marine Corps veteran in a wheelchair. The media, meanwhile, was kept at a distance and mostly out of earshot of Clinton’s interactions in this rural, working-class community. A few minutes into the parade, her aides unfurled a long rope across the street to physically block journalists from getting too close to the candidate. “It feels like a coronation, doesn’t it?” one man shouted. “God bless the queen!” Clinton, smiling in a red-white-and-blue pantsuit and navy Salvatore Ferragamo patent leather flats, pretended not to hear him and remarked, “I actually love parades.” At another parade at the other end of New Hampshire, another dynasty candidate also tried to shake impressions of being aloof. Jeb Bush has been laboring to rid himself of the burdens of his family’s political legacy. But as the former Republican governor of Florida walked the parade route in Amherst, it became clear how difficult it would be for voters to distinguish him from his father and brother, both former presidents. A few people accidentally called him George. One man wore a red T-shirt that said, “Bush Hat Trick,” a reference to when hockey players score three goals in a game. “Where did you get that shirt?” Bush asked begrudgingly. When an older woman said, “I love your mother,” the candidate replied, “I love her, too!” Others had different opinions. “No more Bushes!” one woman shouted at the candidate. “No more Bushes!” Marching in Independence Day parades is a time-honored political tradition in New Hampshire, which hosts the first presidential primary. With seven months until the primary, candidates fanned out across the state Saturday to walk with their supporters carrying signs, balloons or other insignia — and to win over new fans. In Wolfeboro, a picturesque tourist town on Lake Winnipesaukee, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) marched in the morning parade. Both candidates, as well as their families, had spent the night at the home of Wolfeboro’s most famous part-time resident: Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican nominee. The three politicians were spotted getting ice cream together at Bailey’s Bubble on Friday night. Former Texas governor Rick Perry (R), Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) and former Rhode Island governor Lincoln Chafee (D) also marched in the Amherst parade with Bush. Other candidates had contingents if they, themselves, couldn’t participate. One of the biggest draws there was a blue school bus, powered by vegetable oil, to promote the candidacy of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). Riding aboard the bus were two chickens, Clucky and Chucky. Bush’s group was relatively subdued. Sporting chinos and a button-down shirt, Bush walked with about 30 campaign volunteers. Their big attraction was a 1961 silver Corvette with red leather interior, driven by state Sen. Russell Prescott. “I’m carrying water for Jeb Bush,” Prescott said. He literally was: A case of bottled water was on the floor of the car next to him. As the parade began, an EMT worker instructed Bush: “Keep everybody hydrated. I don’t want to have to work today.” Bush was joined by son George P., the Texas land commissioner, and Bush’s daughter, Noelle, who rarely appears publicly with her father. Unlike her more gregarious brother, who kept near his father, she trailed behind, blending in with the crowd and handing out stickers. Bush hustled on the parade route, darting back and forth across the street, seemingly determined to shake every hand on both sides. It was an impossible feat, of course, and quickly slowed down the parade. At one point, a parade marshal, Paula Schmida, asked Bush adviser Rich Killion to get the candidate to pick up the pace. Like Clinton, Bush was confronted by aggressive activists, some of whom wore orange T-shirts and sunglasses furnished by NextGen Climate, the group funded by billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer. One young woman handed Bush a small cup with a slushy treat, telling him that it represented a warming planet. “Oh, yeah? I already got one of those,” Bush told her. “Our second one today,” Killion said as he took the treat from Bush and nudged the woman back. When another woman haggled over climate change with Bush, the candidate, clearly aggravated, told her to “chill out!” In Gorham, Clinton was joined on the parade route by a few dozen supporters. They carried a big banner and signs with her H campaign logo and chanted “H-I-L-L-A-R-Y!” But one man followed closely at Clinton’s side with a very different message: “Benghazi,” read the homemade sign, with what looked like red blood dripping from the letters. He screamed at her about the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks in Libya and her book-tour gaffe last year that she and former president Bill Clinton had been “dead broke.” “Where were you when the phone rang at 3 a.m. on September 11th?” he asked. “Tell us about when you were poor,” he demanded. Across the way, a man on a bicycle shouted at Clinton: “What about Benghazi? What about the e-mails? You’re a liar!” One Clinton aide, noticing the man’s spandex biking outfit, shot back, “Nice shorts.” Clinton did not seem fazed by the hecklers. Asked at the end how the parade went, she said, “It was fabulous!” But by this point, the Clinton campaign’s rope line barring journalists had lighted up Twitter. Within about an hour, Jennifer Horn, chairman of the New Hampshire Republican State Committee, was out with a statement calling the rope “a sad joke” and condemning Clinton for “arrogant and shameful behavior.” “Hillary Clinton continues to demonstrate her obvious contempt and disdain for the Granite State’s style of grass-roots campaigning,” Horn said. At day’s end, Clinton visited a diner-style restaurant in nearby Berlin to mix and mingle. “How are the fries?” she asked a woman and her two children, sliding into the booth to join them for a moment. Clinton then headed to an empty table, where two slices of pie (blueberry and raspberry) awaited her. Reporters followed. “Okay, you guys are not gonna film me eating,” she said, sitting down with aides Huma Abedin, Kristina Schake and Mike Vlacich. When one reporter asked her about Donald Trump, Clinton demurred. “You know,” she said, “I’m gonna sit down and have some pie.” *Clinton campaign gives new meaning to the term ‘rope line’ at New Hampshire parade <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/04/clinton-campaign-gives-new-meaning-to-the-term-rope-line-at-new-hampshire-parade/> // WaPo // Vanessa Williams – July 4, 2015* It wasn't like A-list celebrities or pro ballers were being hounded by the paparazzi at Saturday's Independence Day parade in Gorham, N.H. It was just Hillary Clinton and the workaday press corps that regularly follows her around. So why did the Democratic presidential candidate’s campaign see fit to put up a rope line to keep reporters and photographers at bay while Clinton shook hands and greeted voters during an afternoon procession up Main Street? Our colleague Philip Rucker reports that initially the press had been able to get close to Clinton and observe and listen as she chatted up voters. Then he said campaign aides unfurled a rope that stretched across the street, blocking access to the candidate. Rucker said they were kept 10 to 15 feet away from Clinton and could no longer hear what she was saying to people. But the press could clearly hear what some people were saying to her. A group of protesters followed her along the route shouting such sentiments as "What about Benghazi?" and "Show us your e-mails!" The conservative news site Twitchy was clearly enjoying the spectacle. The New Hampshire Republican Party denounced "the use of a rope line to protect the arrogant Democrat frontrunner on a public street." “Hillary Clinton continues to demonstrate her obvious contempt and disdain for the Granite State’s style of grassroots campaigning," Jennifer Horn, chairman of the state GOP, said in a statement. "The use of a rope line at a New Hampshire parade is a sad joke and insults the traditions of our First-in-the-Nation primary." Clinton herself was quite pleased with the event: Liz Kreutz @ABCLiz Hillary Clinton to @PhilipRucker on how she enjoyed the parade: "It was fabulous!" *Bernie and Hillary's holiday weekend <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/bernie-and-hillarys-holiday-weekend-119732.html> // Politico // Annie Karni & Jonathan Topaz – July 4, 2015* GORHAM, N.H. — Hillary Clinton trekked to this small town in the White Mountains Saturday to march in a low-key Fourth of July parade, where she was trailed by a vocal heckler and surrounded by so many cameras that her aides employed a rope to corral the press. After about 25 minutes of marching at a brisk pace and shaking hands with locals, Clinton headed to a diner where she chatted about policy issues with a handful of late lunchers, and then sat down to eat pie alone with a few of her senior staffers. It was the second leg of her two-day Granite State tour — on Friday she spoke at a campaign cookout that attracted about 850 people in the liberal enclave of Hanover, vowing: “I take a backseat to no one when you look at my record in standing up and fighting for progressive values.” Meanwhile, Clinton’s main Democratic rival, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, spent the holiday weekend campaigning in Iowa, where a crowd of about 2,500 people overflowed a Friday evening rally in Council Bluffs. On Saturday, riding high off the energy of the crowd, he marched in two parades, in Creston and Waukee, a Republican-leaning suburb of Des Moines, where the crowd yelled for him: “We love you Bernie, yes we do!” With seven months to go before the first caucuses in the country, the split-screen appearances offered telling clues to the state of the race between the Democratic front-runner and her insurgent rival on the left. Clinton’s events and appearances are modest and controlled, marked by caution and distance. Despite a double-digit lead over Sanders, she’s still seeking to establish her credentials to her skeptics on the left. For his part, Sanders is feeding off a wave of liberal enthusiasm and plowing forward with populist grit. He’s embracing his surging underdog role — and the media attention and crowds accompanying it. Clinton’s van arrived in Gorham just before 2 p.m., when she greeted local elected officials and a union leader inside a pizza parlor. Earlier in the day, she spoke at a grassroots campaign organizing event outside of Bartlett, N.H., which drew about 100 people at the private home of a supporter. The parade route — just under a mile along the town’s Main Street, dotted with Clinton campaign posters — was complicated by a persistent heckler who trailed Clinton waving a poster that read “Benghazi,” and yelling out taunts at the candidate (“Carpetbagger!” “Where were you at 3 in the morning when the phone rang!” “Tell us when you were poor!”). Clinton wore a grin-and-bear-it smile as she continued shaking hands. “I’m just having a good time meeting everybody,” she shrugged when asked by reporters about the disruption. To further complicate matters, Clinton’s advance team, worried a swarm of over a dozen reporters and cameras were blocking the former secretary of state from seeing the locals along the route, herded the press away from the candidate with the unsightly aid of a rope line. Photographs of reporters being physically dragged along by campaign staffers only bolstered the image of Clinton as press-averse. Republicans pounced on the photographs. “Today, Republican presidential candidates marched in parades across New Hampshire that were open to the public without obstruction from their staff,” New Hampshire Republican State Committee Chairman Jennifer Horn said in a statement. Despite the disruptions, Clinton managed to interact with a few parade-goers. She stopped to chat with a veteran after an aide pointed her toward Nellie Bagli, who was watching the parade with her disabled son, Jose, 40, a Marine who has been in a wheelchair since being injured by a grenade in Iraq in 2006. “Thank you for your sacrifice,” Clinton told them, with emotion in her voice. “I’ll be thinking of you.” She told Bagli that the holiday was all about people like her son. But Bagli shrugged off the interaction with Clinton. “I’m not sure yet,” she said of who she plans to vote for. Pointing to her son, she said: “I lost a lot here. By losing that much, it’s hard to believe a lot.” Clinton did not take any questions from the press, but told a gaggle of reporters as she headed for the diner: “I love parades, I love walking in parades. We got such a great response, a lot of enthusiasm and energy to celebrate the Fourth of July.” At her third stop of the day, at Northland Restaurant & Dairy Bar, Clinton spoke with about eight diners before settling into a corner table with two top campaign aides and her state director, Mike Vlacich, in front of thick slices of blueberry and raspberry pie. She refused to answer a question about Donald Trump. “You know, I’m gonna sit down and have some pie,” she said, as a swarm of reporters was ushered out of the restaurant. Roughly 1,500 miles away, in central Iowa, Sanders headed into the holiday weekend with the wind at his back, and his poll numbers showing him up to 33 percent in the Hawkeye State. On Wednesday night, he hosted by far the biggest rally of the presidential cycle, attracting roughly 10,000 people at a raucous rally in Madison, Wisconsin. At the Friday rally in Council Bluffs, campaign officials passed out envelopes for campaign contributions and signed up volunteers. “They cheered when he called for raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour,” said a spokesman, in an ebullient statement released Friday evening touting “the biggest Iowa crowd so far for any presidential candidate.” “They applauded when he said it’s time to break up the big banks on Wall Street. They shouted approval when he credited Pope Francis for his call for bold action to prevent catastrophic climate change. They rose to their feet when he said the United States should join every other major country and provide health care as a right of citizenship.” Sanders received another boost Friday — an endorsement from Larry Cohen, who recently stepped down as president of the Communications Workers of America. “This is not a close call,” Cohen said at a press conference at a Council Bluffs union hall. “This is a guy who for his entire life has been there for working people.” Members of several other unions — including the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the International Association of Firefighters — also attended the event. Organized labor has been a core constituency for Sanders during his time in the Senate, and in a sign of his increasing traction, AFL-CIO chief Richard Trumka sent a memo this week to state, central and area divisions of the labor federation reminding them that its bylaws don’t permit them to “endorse a presidential candidate” or “introduce, consider, debate, or pass resolutions or statements that indicate a preference for one candidate over another.” Pete D’Alessandro, Sanders’ Iowa director, said Sanders’ trip showed his appeal throughout the state, and not just in liberal bastions like Iowa City. “This isn’t some regional campaign. The message is resonating everywhere,” he said. The campaign will have 30-35 people on the ground in Iowa by the end of the month and has a goal for 75-100 people by caucus night next year, D’Alessandro said. Clinton is scheduled to make her fourth visit to Iowa on Tuesday. Her campaign, meanwhile, shrugged off the rope line drama with humor and said the day went according to plan. “While the GOP may want to spin a good yarn on this, let’s not get tied up in knots,” spokesman Nick Merrill said in a statement. “We wanted to accommodate the press, allow her to greet voters, and allow the press to be right there in the parade with her as opposed to preset locations. And that’s what we did.” *Clinton goes after a Bush in New Hampshire <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/03/politics/hillary-clinton-george-bush-new-hampshire/> // CNN // Dan Merica – July 4, 2015* Hanover, New Hampshire – Hillary Clinton went after a member of the Bush family on Friday in New Hampshire. Just not the one who is running for President. Instead, Clinton subtly knocked -- but did not name -- George W. Bush twice in a speech where she portrayed herself as a progressive fighter. "If you look at the evidence, at the end of Bill Clinton's two terms, we had the longest peacetime expansion in American history with 22 million new jobs, a balanced budget and a surplus that would have paid off our national debt if it had not been rudely interrupted by the next administration," Clinton said to loud applause from the assembled Dartmouth College students and local Democrats. Clinton argued that "there is just a pattern" in which a Republican President wrecks the economy and it is left to the succeeding Democratic President to fix it. As her proof, Clinton pointed to both her husband and President Barack Obama, who she argued does not get enough credit for his response to the recession when he took office 2009. "There is just a pattern here where the other side keeps using the same old tired, failed policies. They don't work," Clinton said. "And then Democratic presidents have to come in and fix what was broken." And as a pitch for herself, Clinton said, "So lets break that and have a Democratic President to continue the policies that actually work for the vast majority of Americans." Clinton's visit to New Hampshire for the Fourth of July holiday is her fourth to the first-in-the-nation primary state since she launched her campaign in April. To date, the campaign has focused on small events and organizing, something Clinton's aides hope will pay off at primary time in January 2016. At Friday's event, Clinton delivered her standard stump speech to a crowd of around 850, the campaign said. "We have to take on the gun lobby one more time," Clinton said in a pitch for gun control. "At the very least, we need to keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, people with serious mental challenges, terrorists, all of whom now are perfectly free to go and find a gun somewhere. This is a controversial issue, I am well aware of that. But I think it is the height of irresponsibility not to talk about it. So I will talk about it." Clinton spoke at length about how difficult the presidency is, calling it the "hardest job in the world," but one she knows she wants. After the speech, Clinton and her staff headed to Dairy Twirl, a small local ice cream shop in Lebanon, the town over from Hanover. "It's Fourth of July. You've got to get some ice cream," she said, getting out of her van. After ordering for herself, Clinton turned to the press and offered to buy. "Would you guys like some ice cream?" Clinton asked the dozen or so reporters with her. "Those of you have traveled to the Upper Valley in pursuit of presidential politics. How about it? I'm paying. I'll buy if anybody wants it." Instead of ice cream orders, though, Clinton was asked about Bernie Sanders, her Democratic challenger who has been surging lately, and why she hasn't drawn sizable crowds like the Independent Vermont senator. "We each run our own campaigns, and I always knew this was going to be competitive," she said. "I want to have a great debate in the primary and caucus around the country and that is what I am looking forward to." Earlier this week, Sanders was greeted by 9,600 people at an event in Madison, Wisconsin. Although crowd size does not equal electoral success, the Sanders campaign argues it shows excitement around their candidate and a lack of enthusiasm for Clinton. The largest event Clinton has held so far was her campaign kickoff rally on New York's Roosevelt Island last month, where a few thousand people attended. After taking two more questions, Clinton's ice cream appeared in the window. "Is that for me?" she said at the size of the scoops. "Holy schmoley." Clinton then shook a few more hands, met the owners of the shop and hopped into her van, headed for a fundraiser at the Holderness, New Hampshire home of Meg and Gary Hirshberg, the owners of the Stonyfield Farm organic yogurt company. Clinton will celebrate the Fourth of July in Gorham, New Hampshire, where she will walk in their holiday parade. *Clinton campaign corrals media <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/04/politics/hillary-clinton-rope-line-reporters/index.html> // Dan Merica // CNN – July 4, 2015* Gorham, New Hampshire (CNN)Hillary Clinton's campaign used a rope to keep journalists away from the candidate on Saturday while she walked in this small town's July Fourth parade. The ensuing photos of journalists, including a CNN reporter, being somewhat dragged by a thin white rope as Clinton walked down Main Street caught fire online. Initially, Clinton's campaign was not using a rope to corral the press, allowing journalists to get close to her and ask her questions. But campaign aides said they brought the rope out because they feared the press scrum of around a dozen reporters and photojournalists would obstruct the view of New Hampshire voters attending the parade. The rope was held by two of Clinton's advance staffers, who at times walked ahead of reporters, seemingly pulling them along the parade route. "You guys, we are going to do 10 yards and a little more organized," said one of the advance staffers after breaking out the rope. In explaining why they were using the rope, the staffer said, "so maybe a voter could see her, that kind of thing." Clinton's Secret Service detail also urged journalists to abide by the mobile rope line. "You are not going fast enough," one agent said when the rope tightened around a reporter's waist. Since the campaign launched in April, Clinton's aides have tried to improve typically tense relations between the Clintons and the press, at times calling for a reset with reporters covering Clinton. While the circus aspect of the event at times overshadowed Clinton's time at the parade, the candidate did glad-hand with many supporters and New Hampshire voters. At one point, she spoke with a wheelchair-bound Marine and his mother. The Iraq War veteran, who had a Marines blanket draped across most of his body, was injured by a grenade attack in March 2006. Clinton walked away from the conversation somewhat shaken. "Whoa," she said when CNN asked her about the interaction. But in addition to the corralled media and New Hampshire voters excited to see the presidential candidate, Clinton was followed by one vocal protester with a sign that read, "Benghazi." The older man, whose sign had fake blood spattered on it, continually shouted at the former secretary of state. "Hillary, where were you at 3 a.m. when the phone rang on September 11?" he yelled, referring to the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi that left four Americans dead. He also yelled "carpetbagger," a reference to her 2000 Senate race in New York, and "Tell us when you were poor," a reference to a 2014 comment about being "dead broke" when she and former President Bill Clinton left the White House in 2001. As the protester continued to follow Clinton, volunteers from the campaign followed him, chanting "Hillary, Hillary, Hillary." Clinton was asked about the protesters, to which she responded, "I am just having a good time meeting everybody." Clinton rarely comes in such close contact with protesters. Although there are regularly protesters outside her events, few ever get within shouting distance of her, let alone close enough to get her attention like the man. A Clinton spokesperson told CNN called the rope a "soft barrier" that was necessary because the media mass around the candidate was making it "impossible" for her to talk to people. One camera operator backpedaled into a toddler, the Clinton spokesperson said, and the rope made it possible for the parade to move smoothly. But the Clinton campaign's use of a mobile rope line was catnip for Republicans, who seized on the issue. "We all knew Hillary Clinton was desperate to avoid the media after months of controversy, but employing a moving rope line takes ducking reporters to absurd new heights," said Michael Short, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee. "Clearly the Fourth of July for Hillary Clinton means independence from answering tough questions." The New Hampshire Republican Party took note. "Clinton continues to demonstrate her obvious contempt and disdain for the Granite State's style of grassroots campaigning. The use of a rope line at a New Hampshire parade is a sad joke and insults the traditions of our First-in-the-Nation primary," New Hampshire Republican State Committee Chairman Jennifer Horn said in a statement. But the Clinton campaign fired back. "While the GOP may want to spin a good yarn on this, let's not get tied up in knots," said Nick Merrill, the campaign's traveling press secretary. "We wanted to accommodate the press, allow her to greet voters, and allow the press to be right there in the parade with her as opposed to preset locations. And that's what we did." *Who Clinton was looking for in New Hampshire <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/04/politics/hillary-clinton-boy-new-hampshire/> // CNN // Cassie Spodak – July 4, 2015* Wolfeboro, New Hampshire (CNN)Hillary Clinton shook hands with countless supporters this weekend. But there was one backer she recognized in particular when she made her fourth visit to New Hampshire as a presidential candidate: 9-year-old Ollie Olsen. In June, Clinton held a rally outside Concord, New Hampshire, and signed a number of souvenirs supporters had left for her, one of which was a note Ollie wrote excusing him from school that day. Ollie didn't realize she had signed it until the campaign tweeted out a picture, and he didn't get to meet the Democratic presidential hopeful. But at Friday's grassroots event in Hanover, Ollie told CNN that Clinton came right up to him and said, "You're Ollie!" "She said, 'You're the boy from the note,' and she noticed my grandma was a really good tennis player," he said. Ollie was there with his mom Sarah, her boyfriend and her parents, and said they have no idea how she knew Sarah's mother, Lee, was a tennis player. "I'm sure she was briefed, but that was really cute and just made us feel very special, even when she was about to go on stage in front of all these people she just made us feel very important," Sarah Olsen told CNN. Ollie and Clinton didn't talk for long, but they did take a picture with the note. Ollie plans to campaign for Clinton this fall and said he's excited that Hillary Clinton could be the first woman president. "It would be important because she would be the first woman president and that would be a lot of education for other kids learning Hillary Clinton was the first woman president," he told CNN. "It would be, like, as big as Abraham Lincoln." For Sarah Olsen, the meeting is an important part of Ollie's education as a future New Hampshire voter. "We want Ollie to go to all the different events and see Republicans and see Bernie Sanders and just kind of experience it and be able to make up his own mind for what he wants," she told CNN. "None of his friends know anything about politics. Granted, they're only 9, they don't vote for a while. They just completely don't understand why are all these people coming to New Hampshire, why this is so important." *Clinton has strong words on Chinese hacking <http://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/04/politics/clinton-china-hacking/> // CNN // Dan Merica & Mariano Castillo – July 5, 2015* (CNN)Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton unleashed some of the strongest words to date about China's hacking of U.S. computers. China is "trying to hack into everything that doesn't move" in the United States, Clinton said, accusing the Chinese of stealing information from both businesses and government agencies. China is suspected of the recent theft of the personal data of about 18 million current, former and prospective federal employees who were affected by a cyber breach at the Office of Personnel Management. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told an intelligence conference last month that the Chinese are "the leading suspect" in the massive hack of the OPM. "They're also trying to hack into everything that doesn't move in America," Clinton said at a campaign event in Glen, New Hampshire. "Stealing commercial secrets, blueprints from defense contractors, stealing huge amounts of government information. All looking for an advantage." Clinton said America's response to China's rise will determine much of the future for the United States and the world. "I want to see a peaceful rise for China," Clinton said. "I worked very hard on that as secretary of state, I will continue to do so. But we also have to be fully vigilant that China's military is growing very quickly and they are establishing military installations that again threaten countries we have treaties with, like the Philippines, because they are building on contested property." Clinton was referring to China's building of manmade islands in disputed waters. *Hillary Clinton Reporters Kept Behind Moving Rope Line At New Hampshire Parade <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-reporters-moving-rope-line-hampshire-parade/story?id=32225818> // ABC News // Liz Kreutz – July 4, 2015* At the Fourth of July parade Hillary Clinton marched in today in Gorham, New Hampshire, reporters following the candidate were kept -- and at moments, dragged -- behind an actual moving rope line. The rope, which two Clinton staffers held on to on either side, was meant to give Clinton space as she walked down the parade route, but photos of reporters being dragged behind the rope as she marched have gone viral on Twitter. The New Hampshire GOP released a statement critiquing Clinton, saying her use of the rope "insults the traditions of our First-in-the-Nation primary" and touted the Republican presidential candidates for marching in parades without "obstruction from their staff." Clinton's campaign has not responded to ABC News' request for comment regarding the use of the rope for reporters or to the GOP criticism. Clinton, meanwhile, seemed to enjoy the parade herself, as she waved to and greeted voters -- ignoring a group of loud protesters that trailed right behind her. "Where were you at 3am when the phone rang? Name one accomplishment! Tell us about when you were poor!" shouted one man, holding up a sign that read "BENGHAZI." But Clinton didn't let that rattle her. "I'm just having a good time meeting everybody," Clinton said when asked whether she had anything to say to them. And even by the end, her sentiment hadn't changed. "It was fabulous," she said. "I love parades, I love walking in parades, got such a great response ... a lot of enthusiasm and energy to celebrate the Fourth of July." Following the event, Clinton made a stop at Dairy Bar, a relatively empty nearby restaurant, where she mingled with patrons. Clinton was asked by this reporter about her thoughts to the backlash against Donald Trump. But she dismissed the question in lieu of dessert. "I'm going to sit down and have some pie," she said. *Clinton defends progressive record as campaigns hit Independence Day <http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/04/clinton-on-defensive-new-hampshire-iowa> // The Guardian // Jana Kasperkevic – July 4, 2015* As 2016 presidential candidates flocked to spend Independence Day in early voting states such as Iowa and New Hampshire, Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton found herself defending her record on policy and the size of crowds at her events. “I take a backseat to no one when you look at my record in standing up and fighting for progressive values,” Clinton told an audience in Hanover, New Hampshire, on Friday. On Saturday, Independence Day itself, she spoke extensively about subjects including last week’s historic supreme court ruling on same-sex marriage, saying: “The language Justice Kennedy uses about the bonds between people is just almost mystical. It’s beautiful. So we have to do everything we can to end discrimination in the LGBT community.” Clinton has come under greater-than-expected pressure from the independent Vermont senator Bernie Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist running a determinedly grassroots-focused campaign who nonetheless attracted nearly 10,000 people to a rally in Wisconsin on Wednesday. On Friday night, a Sanders event in Council Buffs, Iowa, was standing-room only. On Friday, while visiting the Dairy Twirl ice cream shop in Lebanon, Clinton was asked why she was not drawing such big crowds. “Well, we each run our own campaigns and I always knew this was gonna be competitive,” she said. “And I want to have a great debate in the primary and caucuses around the country and that’s what I’m looking forward to.” Clinton also said her defeat by Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary had taught her the importance of organizing every single day. “That’s why I’m doing a lot of meetings and discussions about specific issues,” she said, “because I want to hear from people and I also want to connect them to the campaign. “And I feel like it’s really working. It is building a campaign here in New Hampshire, using the grassroots, and coming up from that, because at the end of the day, I think that wins elections and wins caucuses.” On the morning of 4 July, the former senator and secretary of state attended a grassroots organizing event in Glen. Asked about the Obama administration’s involvement in ongoing nuclear talks with Iran, she said: “I’m hoping it’s a strong, verifiable deal that will put the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons ambitions. Even if we are successful, however, Iran’s aggressiveness will not end.” In an hour-long event, Clinton also discussed her ideas on college debt, the same-sex marriage ruling and the future makeup of the court. College graduates and those with graduate degrees should get help to refinance their debt and be allowed to pay back their loans as a percentage of their incomes, she said, adding of her early life with her husband, former President Bill Clinton: “We were paying back loans while he was governor of Arkansas.” Clinton encouraged people to read the supreme court’s decision extending same-sex marriage rights nationwide, saying “it’s not only a constitutionally based decision, which it should be, but there is a current underpinning it, which is [that] we need to respect each other, and we need to allow people to live and love and we need to support that”. Asked about the future of the court, Clinton said it was possible the next president could have three to four appointments. If elected, she said she would appoint justices who would “bring an open mind and an open heart”. In the afternoon, Clinton was set to march in the Gorham Fourth of July parade. Former Rhode Island governor Lincoln Chafee, another candidate for the Democratic nomination, was also campaigning in the state, planning to visit Merrimack and Amherst. Sanders and the former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley were both in Iowa. Sanders was due to march in parades in Creston and Waukee. Sanders has been gaining on Clinton. On Thursday, a Quinnipiac University poll found Clinton at 52% in Iowa while Sanders had climbed to 33%. On 7 May, Clinton led the same poll by 60% to 15%. The latest CNN poll shows Clinton only eight points ahead of Sanders in New Hampshire, although national surveys remain more clearly in Clinton’s favor. Republican presidential candidates also opted to celebrate Independence Day in the early voting states. After a “sleepover” at 2012 candidate Mitt Romney’s vacation home in New Hampshire, New Jersey governor Chris Christie and Florida senator Marco Rubio were to march in Wolfeboro’s parade. The former Texas governor Rick Perry, former Florida governor Jeb Bush and South Carolina senator Lindsey Graham joined Chafee for a parade in Amherst. Bush and Chafee have old school ties in common. They duly met up, the Democratic candidate using Twitter to say: “Always fun to run into classmates @phillipsacademy on the campaign trail.” Bush, who was marching with his son George P Bush, the recently elected Texas land commissioner, was chided by a voter who told him he was holding up the parade. “There’s nothing behind us – other than Hillary,” Bush said. A team of Clinton supporters were marching right behind a group backing the former Florida governor, their blue signs in sharp contrast with his red. *Hillary Clinton Says She Will Be Better Friend than Obama to Israel <http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/hillary-clinton-says-she-will-be-better-friend-than-obama-to-israel/2015/07/04/> // Jewish Press // Tzvi Ben-Gedalyahu – July 4, 2015* Hillary Clinton has promised that Israel will have her as a better friend than President Barack Obama if she is elected President next year. She also exclaimed that Iran poses an “existential threat” to Israel, as if any serious presidential contender thinks otherwise. While strongly supporting attempts for a “good” deal with Iran, she is trying to reassure wealthy Jews that they can safely contribute to her campaign coffers and can sleep safely last night knowing that she will be good for Israel, even if Israelis spend the night running to bomb shelters. That is what President Obama also said in 2008. That is what every presidential candidate says, but American Jews lover to hear because they want to believe it. When it comes to the deal being negotiated between the P5+1 and Iran, Clinton is playing both sides of the fence, and it is not clear where she stands. Politico interviewed 10 donors and fundraisers and reported: Donors who see a deal as important to world peace have come away thinking that Clinton shares their perspective, but so, too, do donors who oppose any prospective agreement as compromising Israeli security. Clinton is no different from Obama and every other politician. “No deal is better than a bad deal,” she said, but what is a bad deal? Is it possible to make any deal with Iran can call it “good?” Since no one yet knows if a deal with Iran will be reached and if so, what it will contain, Clinton can safely hedge her bets. At stake is $2 billion that Clinton’s aides hope to raise for her campaign and super PACs. in the meantime, she is boasting that her personality and experience as Secretary of State are guarantees for Americans Jews that she will be a lot friendlier than Obama when it comes to relations with Israel. She started name-dropping, referring to former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren as “Michael” whom she said she knows well. The penchant for American Jews to buy assurances that the American-Israeli relation will be just fine and dandy was summed up by Politico’s report on a fundraiser last month at the home of Democratic party donor Jay Jacobs. An Orthodox rabbi asked Clinton about threats to Israel, and Jacobs told Politico: She did stress in no uncertain terms her full and fervent support of the state of Israel and the defense of the state of Israel. And the people in the audience who heard it seemed to be comfortable with her answer. Good grief! What did the rabbi think she would say? Did he really believe that Clinton would say, “Well, you know all the talk about threats to Israel is just talk to get more money from the military-industrial complex. Israel can fend for itself. Let’s talk about the economy and immigration.” Of course she fervently supports Israel. That is what J Street also says. At least she was honest when she stated, “I’m going to do what’s in the best interest of the U.S.” That is what any president of the United States should do. He or she should be “pro-American” and not “pro-Israel.” The kicker is that being pro-Israel usually is the best thing for the United States, even if presidents can’t admit it. *From Clinton, a multi-generational message in N.H. <http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/07/03/from-clinton-multi-generational-message/7HXFtZn6z6YQNVVTK9HN0M/story.html?event=event25> // Boston Globe // Monica Disare – July 4, 2015* HANOVER, N.H. — Hillary Rodham Clinton kicked off her Fourth of July weekend by telling about 850 people at Dartmouth College that two people motivated her run for president: her mother and her granddaughter. Her mother, Clinton said, instilled in her a steadfast belief in kindness, while her granddaughter makes her think about “what kind of world will be waiting for her.” “That’s what keeps me up at night,” Clinton said. Clinton’s mixed-generational message was apt for the crowd she addressed Friday afternoon — Dartmouth students mingled with longtime Clinton supporters. Lois Little, 67, of New London, N.H., became a Clinton fan 24 years ago but decided not to wear the “Madame President” shirt she bought during Clinton’s unsuccessful 2008 presidential run to avoid jinxing Clinton’s chances. “She’s a very dynamic person, very intelligent,” Little said. Her husband nodded in agreement. Among those who have watched Clinton for years were some who were lukewarm toward her — but nonetheless likely to vote for her. Julie McCashin, 52, of Hanover, said she was not a diehard Clinton fan, but she was “diehard anti-Republican.” McCashin said Clinton has the best chance to beat the eventual GOP nominee. Little and McCashin stood in the same crowd, eating hamburgers and potato salad, with Thuy Le, 20, a Dartmouth sophomore who said her philosophy aligns more with Senator Bernie Sanders, another Democratic presidential contender. Le watched Clinton’s speech with a group of five other Dartmouth sophomores who said they were trying to decide between Clinton and Sanders. Parker Gardner, 20, on campus for the summer, said that Clinton was likely the “best option” but he needed more information to be certain. At the Friday event, he said he hoped to hear about her personal journey into politics, not just her policy positions. Clinton will have to appeal to both demographics to be successful both in the Democratic primary and perhaps in the general election. Her speech tried to do just that. She argued that she is the best candidate to improve the economy, disparaging the economic policy efforts of former Republican presidents. “These are folks who just don’t know the theory of original sin,” she said, “because we wouldn’t have had to have a recovery if we hadn’t had the kind of poor management and bad economic policies that put us into the ditch in the first place.” In about 10 days, she said, she would release more details on her economic platform. In the meantime, she ticked through a laundry list of issues important to her campaign, including voting rights, immigration, clean energy, cybersecurity, and removing big money from politics. She praised the Supreme Court’s recent decisions on health care and same-sex marriage. Clinton ended her speech with a set of personal stories. She told the crowd about her mother’s troubled childhood and said her mother kept going because people showed her kindness along the way. She pledged to bring this type of kindness to the White House. “I think we are a nation that really believes in a helping hand,” she said. And she cited her young granddaughter as her inspiration to work toward creating a world the next generation will be proud to inherit. “That flag which we’ll see in parades and at picnics and flying proudly in front of houses this weekend, that flag represents, I believe, humanity’s best progress,” Clinton said. “I want to be proud, and I want my daughter and granddaughter to be proud.” Margaret Mulley, 65, said Clinton’s speech “was very competent and powerful.” But not all the college students were convinced. As Mariana Almeida, 19, and Andrew Jeon, 20, walked away from the event, they said they enjoyed the speech. But as for which candidate they will ultimately support — both walked away undecided. Danielle Foullon, 54, left the event with one piece of advice for Clinton: “Hillary, don’t play it safe.” *Hillary Clinton Comments On Viral ‘Humans of New York’ Photo <http://time.com/3945811/hillary-clinton-humans-of-new-york-gay/> // TIME // Dan Stewart – July 4, 2015* Street photographer Brandon Stanton — better known as the creator of Humans of New York — posted a picture Friday of a tearful boy with the caption, “I’m homosexual and I’m afraid about what my future will be and that people won’t like me.” The post garnered 498,000 ‘Likes’, about standard for a HONY post, but what Stanton may not have expected was a comment from Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Clinton wrote, “Prediction from a grown-up: Your future is going to be amazing. You will surprise yourself with what you’re capable of and the incredible things you go on to do. Find the people who love and believe in you – there will be lots of them.” The photo initially became the subject of controversy when Stanton claimed Facebook had removed it from the site. But a Facebook spokesperson said Saturday the photo had not been intentionally deleted, but had been temporarily unavailable due to a bug. The photo is now available to be seen online, along with Clinton’s comment signed with her distinctive “-H.” Humans of New York features photographs of ordinary people on the street along with quotes from the subjects, who typically do not identify themselves. *Hillary Clinton Has The Top Comment On This Heartbreaking “Humans Of New York” Photo <http://www.buzzfeed.com/davidmack/your-future-is-going-to-be-amazing#.ry3X6Xl73> // Buzzfeed // David Mack – July 4, 2015* You may have seen this heartbreaking “Humans of New York” picture pop up in your Facebook feed recently. The young boy’s tears have elicited a ton of support in the HONY picture’s comments. Someone else who commented on the picture also happens to be running for president. Hillary Clinton posted this comment on the picture on Friday. It reads: Prediction from a grown-up: Your future is going to be amazing. You will surprise yourself with what you’re capable of and the incredible things you go on to do. Find the people who love and believe in you - there will be lots of them. –H The comment was signed “–H”, indicating that the words were penned by Clinton herself and not an aide. *Hillary Clinton accuses China of 'stealing US secrets' <http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33399711> // BBC – July 4, 2015* US Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton has accused China of stealing commercial secrets and government information. She accused China of "trying to hack into everything that doesn't move in America", and urged vigilance. US officials had named China as the chief suspect in the massive hack of the records of a US government agency earlier this year. China had denied any involvement, and called US claims "irresponsible". 'Fully vigilant' Speaking at a campaign event in New Hampshire, Ms Clinton said that China was stealing secrets from defence contractors and had taken "huge amounts of government information, all looking for an advantage." She added that she wanted to see China's peaceful rise but that the US needed to stay "fully vigilant". "China's military is growing very quickly, they're establishing military installations that again threaten countries we have treaties with, like the Philippines because they are building on contested property," she said. US officials have blamed China for a major data breach of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that was revealed in June. The hacking of federal government computers could have compromised the records of four million employees. US intelligence chief James Clapper called China a "leading suspect" after the incident. But China dismissed the accusation, saying that it was "irresponsible and unscientific". China has previously argued that it is also the victim of hacking attacks. Republican presidential candidates have used the recent OPM cyber hack to attack President Obama's administration, accusing it of "incompetence". Marco Rubio and Rick Perry have called for the US to threaten sanctions against organisations linked to hacking, while Mike Huckabee has argued that the US should "hack China back". Meanwhile, Democratic candidate Martin O'Malley has called for better funding for cyber security. The hack against the OPM is not the first time that China has been blamed for a cyber attack against the US. An earlier attempt to breach OPM networks was blocked in March 2014, with the US saying China was behind the attack. *Union chief defends Hillary amid Bernie Sanders uprising <http://nypost.com/2015/07/04/union-chief-defends-hillary-amid-bernie-sanders-uprising/> // New York Post // Geoff Earle – July 4, 2015* WASHINGTON — AFL-CIO boss Richard Trumka is using his political muscle to try to run interference for Hillary Rodham Clinton, after movement by some local labor groups to back rival Bernie Sanders. The powerful union head advised state and local union chapters this week that the national union in DC handles presidential endorsements. “I want to remind you all that the AFL-CIO endorsement for president and vice president belongs to the national AFL-CIO. State federations, central and area labor councils, and all other subordinate bodies must follow the national AFL-CIO endorsement,” Trumka wrote, according to Politico. Clinton’s campaign is facing a growing challenge from Sanders. The South Carolina and Vermont AFL-CIOs passed resolutions this spring calling on “working people everywhere” to unite behind Sanders. *Clinton, Chafee celebrate Fourth of July in the Granite State <http://www.wmur.com/news/clinton-chafee-celebrate-fourth-of-july-in-the-granite-state/33998250> // WMUR9 // Kristen Carosa – July 4, 2015* GLEN, N.H. —Presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Lincoln Chafee celebrated the Fourth of July in New Hampshire Saturday. Clinton opened an event in Glen by discussing her granddaughter. “You know, you say to yourself, ‘I want to do everything I can to make sure this precious little girl has every opportunity,’” Clinton said. She said her campaign is about fighting for the middle class and helping those in need. “I advocate to raise the minimum wage, that’s why I am a supporter of the income tax credit. We need to get more money into people's pockets," she said. “I want to take a bright light and shine it on every regulation, every licensing requirement, every tax requirement and take a hard look at the difficulty of getting credit.” Clinton also spoke about the importance of early education. “If people are not equipped for the jobs of the future then a lot of what we do today won't have staying power,” she said. Clinton also visited the town of Gorham later Saturday. She will head to Iowa Tuesday. Chafee, the former Rhode Island governor, met voters during Fourth of July parades in Merrimack and Amherst. Chafee worked with Clinton in the Senate and said he looks forward to seeing her on the presidential trail. He said he differs from Clinton because he voted against the war in Iraq. “I bring a good resume, a vision for the future, a more peaceful world, not that hawkish approach is what I'm advocating. Bring those tax dollars home here to spend on our schools, our roads and bridges and our health care,” Chafee said. Chafee began his political career as a Republican, first holding public office in 1985. *Hillary Clinton tells supporters in Virginia that ‘love triumphed’ in gay marriage <http://sentinelrepublic.com/hillary-clinton-tells-supporters-in-virginia-that-love-triumphed-in-gay-marriage/18583/> // Sentinel Republic // Alan Binder – July 4, 2015* Clinton headlined the state Democratic Party’s annual Jefferson-Jackson event, previously a formal dinner but this year held as a campaign event at George Mason University’s Patriot Center with general admission at $30. The New Hampshire poll shows that many Democrats are responding favorably to Clinton’s candidacy, including 74% who say they have a positive impression of her. She also is more trusted to handle the economy and health care, two of the leading domestic issues in the contest. A fired-up Clinton then seemingly spoke directly at the 13 declared Republican presidential hopefuls. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts), who has said repeatedly that she will not run for president but was still being included in polls at that point. “Hillary Clinton’s early numbers had been higher than they reasonably could have been expected to remain”, Smith said. “Equality triumphed, America triumphed”. Vice President Joe Biden clocks in at 8 percent, with 2 percent or less supporting Martin O’Malley, Jim Webb and Lincoln Chafee. Clinton has the money, the infrastructure, and the support from other prominent Democrats that Sanders lacks, but the Vermont senator has advantages, too: enthusiasm at the grassroots, the flexibility that comes with being a one-man band, and the ability to position himself as a scrappy underdog and outsider. Clinton is seeing her strong lead over Sen. As a senator, Clinton backed civil unions and partner benefits for same-sex couples, and came out in favor of same-sex marriage in 2013, shortly before the Court struck down a key provision of the 1996 law. “The solution is for Congress to admit they screwed up, repeal the ‘nightmare of Obamacare, ‘ and let states road-test real health care reforms”, he said in a statement. Ex- Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, who is seeking the GOP presidential nomination, also blasted the court’s ruling. Neither governor would be able to do anything to stop same-sex marriage in their state if the high court rules it is a constitutional right. Friday’s ruling is just one more step in securing equal rights for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people, she said. But she said she was looking forward to the Clinton rally, especially because “we don’t have to dress up”. Yet it is important to remember that Obama and Clinton both opposed marriage equality as late as early 2012. She also ripped Republicans for recently voting against allowing the Centers for Disease Control to study gun violence. Mrs. Clinton asked “How can you watch massacre after massacre and take that vote?” “I think that break from the pack has already begun”. “I am for Hillary”, Cho said. “This is personal for me”, said McAuliffe of Clinton. The 2016 presidential race came to Virginia on Friday evening, ushered in by the roaring voice of Gov. Terry McAuliffe introducing Hillary Clinton. While we celebrate today, our work won’t be finished until every American cannot only marry, but live, work, pray, learn and raise a family free from discrimination and prejudice. Despite her “crush”, the outspoken entertainer and LGBT rights activist said she’s “long been” a fan of Clinton: “I had a hard time sort of deciding between Hillary and Obama”. His fundraising efforts helped bankroll the campaigns of both Clinton and her husband, ex- President Bill Clinton. But most of all…because Hillary Clinton is a tenacious fighter. *Hillary Clinton shrugs off heckler while GOP candidates meet voters in New Hampshire, Iowa for Fourth of July campaigning <http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/presidential-candidates-spend-july-4-campaigning-article-1.2281759> // NY Daily News // Dennis Slattery – July 4, 2015* Fourth of July parade routes were transformed into campaign trails Saturday as presidential candidates spent the holiday shaking hands, mingling with voters, and dealing with hecklers. Early primary states celebrating Independence Day -- including Iowa and New Hampshire -- were particularly awash in White House wannabes. Democratic hopeful Hillary Clinton spent the day in the tiny hamlet of Gorham, N.H., where she was taunted by a relentless heckler with a string of grievances, including protesting her role leading the State Department during the 2012 Benghazi attacks. “Hillary, where were you at 3 a.m. when the phone rang on September 11th?” the man yelled as he followed her along the parade route. “Can you name one accomplishment at State? Just one?” Clinton shrugged off the shouter. “I’m just having a good time meeting everybody,” she told CNN. Republican candidates got into the spirit as well, with New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio walking in a parade in Wolfeboro, N.H. Former Govs. Jeb Bush of Florida, Rick Perry of Texas and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island as well as South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham worked the crowd in Amherst, N.H. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley met voters in Iowa. *Clinton hears cheers and jeers <http://www.unionleader.com/article/20150705/NEWS0605/150709647> // New Hampshire Union Leader // John Koziol – July 4, 2015* GORHAM - Hillary Clinton marched in the town's historic Independence Day parade Saturday, exciting her base, provoking her detractors and in general, being met with mild amusement by the public. Preceded by a gaggle of the touring press, some of whom appeared to be filming a video documentary; inside a cordon of uniformed and plainclothes security officer; flanked by staff; and backed by sign-carrying supporters, the former first lady, U.S. senator from New York and Secretary of State walked the entire parade route from Dublin Street down to the Gorham Town Common. The Gorham parade was Clinton's third event in the North County yesterday, sandwiched in between a grassroots organizing event in Glen and a stop at the Northland Restaurant & Dairy Bar in Berlin to schmooze with patrons. Clinton is familiar with the Androscoggin Valley and Coos County, having campaigned here on the way to winning the Jan. 8, 2008, New Hampshire Democratic presidential primary and defeating then-Illinois Sen. Barack Obama. Obama went on to win the Democratic presidential nomination and then the presidency in 2008 and he was re-elected in 2012. Despite those victories, however, Gorham was one prize that Obama could not claim in 2008, as Clinton bested him there by 330 votes to 222. The presumptive Democratic presidential candidate for 2016 - although Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is mounting a strong challenge - Clinton yesterday saw visible signs, a few, not many, that her past will continue to be part of her future and that some people, like Sudie Francoeur and Carl Gagnon, both of Berlin, desperately do not want to see her in the Oval Office. Exercising what they said was their First Amendment right of free speech on the most hallowed of national holidays, both Francoeur and Gagnon held signs with messages that were highly critical of Clinton's role in the deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans at the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012. As he got within earshot of Clinton, Gagnon would lob verbal jabs, asking her, for example, to "tell us about when you were a poor person." One woman yelled that Clinton "oughtta be in prison, not the White House." Nonetheless, Clinton was undeterred, frequently stepping into the groups of parade watchers on either side of the road to greet individuals and to occasionally exchange some words. Francoeur said she had been a longtime Democrat but became disenchanted with what she said was its tilt toward socialism, adding that she was unhappy with Clinton in particular about what happened in Benghazi. Gagnon, who said he's attended the Gorham 4th of July parade "since childhood," said Clinton has been a failure as a public servant and therefore should not even be considered as a presidential candidate. He was dismissive of what he saw Saturday as Clinton marched down Main Street, with supporters loudly chanting her name while local residents - some parked in vehicles directly on the parade route or sitting in lawn chairs on the sidewalk - smiled and politely applauded, or occasionally let out a joyful whoop, or, less frequently, a boo. "The American election process," said Gagnon, "has now turned into a coronation." *OTHER DEMOCRATS NATIONAL COVERAGE* *DECLARED* *O’MALLEY* *Sanders, O’Malley race to be the Clinton alternative <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanders-omalley-race-to-be-the-clinton-alternative/2015/07/04/ccd431ba-202a-11e5-84d5-eb37ee8eaa61_story.html?postshare=9381436039721322> // WaPo // John Wagner – July 4, 2015* COUNCIL BLUFFS, Iowa — Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley, two candidates vying to become the chief challenger to Hillary Rodham Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination, crisscrossed Iowa over the past few days, stopping in some of the same cities and marching in small-town Fourth of July parades. But at this point in the race, they could hardly be in different places. During his swing, Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont, drew more than 2,500 people to a convention center here — a record crowd for Iowa. Supporters leapt to their feet and screamed as he decried the “grotesque level” of income inequality in the country and the outsize influence of the “billionaire class” on its politics. O’Malley’s biggest turnout during his three-day trip was 119 people, who gathered in the side room of a suburban bar outside Des Moines. The former Maryland governor’s pitch included a self-deprecating joke about how little known he remains in the state that will hold the nation’s first caucuses in February. Presidential politics are replete with candidates who get hot during the summer only to fizzle in the fall. But the early rise of Sanders — a self-described democratic socialist — underscores how hungry the progressive base of the Democratic Party is for a truly authentic alternative to Clinton. As his crowds have swelled in recent weeks, Sanders’s poll numbers have jumped in Iowa and New Hampshire. O’Malley and the other more mainstream Democratic hopefuls, meanwhile, have stalled in the low single digits. Former senator Jim Webb of Virginia, who jumped into the race Thursday, and former Rhode Island senator and governor Lincoln Chafee have also stepped forward to challenge Clinton. Scores of interviews suggest Sanders has clearly tapped into the anxieties of recession-weary voters, many of whom feel completely alienated from Washington. Echoing many others who came to see Sanders here, Steve Pinegar, a 33-year-old heating and air-conditioning technician, said he is looking for someone outside the establishment and said he thinks that Sanders is the only candidate for the Democratic nomination who is speaking to him. “I don’t want to vote for anyone who’s part of the grand scheme,” Pinegar said, adding that he has grown disillusioned with President Obama’s lack of progress on working-class issues. “I was all hopey-changey last time, but I’m done with that. . . . I feel like me and Bernie Sanders, we could go have lunch and talk about the issues.” Much of Sanders’s hour-long stump speech focuses on issues that could affect the wallets of workers like Pinegar. Sanders wants to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. He wants to guarantee family leave, sick time and vacation time — Americans are working too long, he says. He wants to make college free. And he promises that as president he would make corporations and the wealthy pay more in taxes while trying to cut taxes for those in lower brackets. “The greed of the billionaire class and corporate America is destroying this great country,” Sanders said Friday night, offering one of a few dozen lines that produced sustained applause from a crowd that included many Nebraskans from across the river. Building on momentum Some of Sanders’s largest audiences lately have been in states without early nominating contests, including in Madison, Wis., where he attracted 10,000 people Wednesday. It was clear from the outset of the race that there would be a bloc of non-Clinton voters, and polling suggests that Sanders — at least for now — has managed to corral most of them. That includes Democrats who were pining to see Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a darling of the left, get into the race. She has suggested recently that she might campaign for Sanders. A Quinnipiac University poll released last week showed Clinton drawing 52 percent of likely Democratic caucusgoers in Iowa, with Sanders at 33 percent. O’Malley lagged with 3 percent, followed by Webb and Chafee, with 1 percent each. Sanders’s numbers have been higher in New Hampshire, where voters are more familiar with him, given his representation of neighboring Vermont. A recent poll from the Granite State showed Sanders trailing Clinton by eight percentage points. Joe Trippi, a longtime Democratic strategist, said Sanders’s challenge will be to build on the momentum he has established and show that he can demonstrate a broader appeal than just to the party’s left wing. “If you’re going to run a campaign based on ‘I’m further to the left of the establishment,’ there’s a ready-made audience,” said Trippi, who ran the 2004 presidential campaign of former Vermont governor Howard Dean. Dean surged in that race based on anti-Iraq war sentiment only to collapse as voting began. Then Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), a candidate with more establishment support, emerged as the Democratic nominee. Trippi said part of the reason Dean lost support is people began to question whether he was the strongest candidate to beat George W. Bush in the general election. The O’Malley camp is betting on a similar phenomenon this cycle: that once voters get to know all the candidates better, they will see O’Malley as a more viable alternative than Sanders. O’Malley, 52, has also been casting himself as a part of a “new generation” of leaders, a contrast with both Clinton, who is 67, and Sanders, who is 73. In an interview following a stop Thursday in Waukee, O’Malley said Sanders has been on the rise partly because voters see him for now as a “protest candidate.” “People feel like big money has subsumed, taken over, their politics, and they’re frustrated by it,” O’Malley said. “People feel like their voices don’t matter. People feel like they’re not being heard, and right now, they want to protest about that. I’m not running for protest candidate; I’m running for president of the United States.” O’Malley’s three-day swing has focused on his plan to address climate change by moving the country’s electricity consumption entirely to clean energy by 2050. Aides say other more substantive proposals will help set him apart in coming months. O’Malley, who served for eight years as Maryland’s governor and seven years as Baltimore mayor, is also increasingly touting his executive experience as an asset. In contrast to Sanders, who talks a lot about legislation he has introduced, O’Malley touts bills that he muscled through in Maryland to legalize same-sex marriage, abolish the death penalty and provide new benefits to immigrants. “There’s a great distance in saying what we’re for and actually accomplishing things,” O’Malley told a crowd of about 70 people who came to see him at a coffeehouse in Newton on Friday. Swaying voters Some analysts suggest O’Malley waited too long to get into the race. By the time of O’Malley’s May 30 announcement, Sanders had already made significant headway with progressive voters looking for an alternative to Clinton. “People were looking for someone to get in that space, and Martin was playing coy, and Bernie wasn’t,” said one Democratic consultant formerly employed by O’Malley who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak more freely. In Newton and elsewhere, there is evidence that O’Malley is making strides with voters that doesn’t show up in a meaningful way yet in the polls. Susan Daniels, a retired property manager, said she came to the event in Newton “to expand my horizons” by hearing from a candidate she didn’t know much about. She left inclined to caucus for O’Malley, impressed by his command of details without notes. She also has nagging doubts about supporting Clinton. Interviews, however, also suggest that Sanders supporters might be harder to peel off than people think. While some who attend his events are still shopping for a candidate, many arrive already sold. Daryl Kothenbeutel, a retired owner of a prairie seed business, drove about 90 minutes from Clear Lake to Fort Dodge on Thursday to see Sanders for the third time in recent weeks. He said he has been most impressed with Sanders’s commitment to fighting climate change and that he likes his other prescriptions for the country. “The man, I think, is our last hope for America. I really do,” said Kothenbeutel, 71. “Hillary seems to bring up everything after Bernie does,” Kothenbeutel said. Tad Devine, a strategist for Sanders, said he thinks Sanders’s support will continue to grow, in part because he has the ability to attract new voters to the race, as Obama did in 2008. Once party elites begin to understand that, Devine suggested, he said he thinks Sanders has the potential to win more backing from the Democratic establishment. Sanders made headway with endorsements over the weekend in New Hampshire, winning the support of longtime party activist Dudley Dudley. Dudley, who in the 1970s became the highest serving woman in the state’s history as an executive councilor, hosted a house party in Durham for O’Malley just two months ago. She told CNN that she has nothing against O’Malley, but she likes the way Sanders delivers his message. “He has a way of stating it in a way that is no-nonsense and so straightforward,” Dudley said. *Martin O’Malley finishes three-day tour in Clinton, Iowa <http://wqad.com/2015/07/04/martin-omalley-finishes-three-day-tour-in-clinton-iowa/> // WQAD8 // Caroline Reinwald – July 4, 2015* Following a three-day tour across the state of Iowa, democratic presidential candidate, Martin O’Malley, stopped in Clinton, Iowa to speak to voters on Saturday. During his visit, O’Malley talked about Social Security reform, immigration reform, and his climate change plan. “We must set a goal as a nation of being 100-percent clean energy powered by 2050. We can do it and create a lot of jobs along the way,” said O’Malley. O’Malley is polling third behind democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, but O’Malley says he plans to break away from the pack in the upcoming weeks. “The people of Iowa are not intimidated by polls or like being told who they are supposed to vote for. They expect to meet every candidate to look them in the eye, ask them questions, shake their hand, and take the full measure of them,” O’Malley said. *SANDERS* *Bernie Sanders Outpaces Martin O’Malley as Hillary Clinton Alternative <http://www.wsj.com/articles/bernie-sanders-outpaces-martin-omalley-as-hillary-clinton-alternative-1436064697> // WSJ // Peter Nicholas and Colleen Mccain Nelson - July 5, 2015 * Once considered the most viable Democratic challenger to Hillary Clinton, former Maryland Gov. O’Malley is struggling to get a toehold CARROLL, Iowa—Waiting for Martin O’Malley to arrive for a backyard campaign stop, Chris Henning and some of her friends tried to figure out what office the Democratic presidential candidate once held. Was he the former governor of Maryland or perhaps Virginia? They weren’t sure. Another Iowan who came out to hear Mr. O’Malley speak was at a loss as to his employment. “He’s from the East Coast,” Rosemary Partridge told a reporter. “Connecticut? I’m trying to guess. He’s a senator.” At one time, the former Maryland governor seemed the most viable alternative to Hillary Clinton the Democratic Party would produce. Yet he is struggling to get a toehold, while the attention and donations from the party’s liberal wing instead are going to an older, rumpled rival: Bernie Sanders, the 73-year-old senator from Vermont. Mr. Sanders is the one drawing boisterous crowds with his fiery attacks on billionaires and wealthy corporations. Mr. Sanders drew about 10,000 people in Madison, Wis., last week, a turnout the campaign billed as the largest in either party to date. “I’ve been waiting for him to run,” said Florita Louis de Malavé, a librarian at the Sanders event in Madison. “He’s not beholden to corporate interests. The other candidates are the same old, same old.” On the stump, Mr. Sanders pledges to take direct aim at the wealthy, diminish their power, expose their tax havens and break up the largest financial institutions in the country. He tells working-class Americans that he’ll fight for higher wages, guaranteed health care, family and medical leave and paid vacations. “This grotesque level of [income] inequality is immoral. It is bad economics. It is unsustainable, and it is not what the United States of America is supposed to be about,” Mr. Sanders said in Madison. Mr. Sanders’s backers say this race is a choice between the senator from Vermont and the former secretary of state; Mr. O’Malley doesn’t figure into their thinking. Mr. Sanders can win the nomination, they say, but if he doesn’t, he may push Mrs. Clinton to the left. “At the very least, I hope some of these ideas take hold,” said Patrick Downing, a piano tuner and technician and luthier from Perry, Wis. In Madison, many Sanders supporters drove long distances to see their candidate of choice, trekking in from other cities and states. Two hours before Mr. Sanders was scheduled to take the stage, thousands were already in line, spilling across the parking lot outside the arena. Inside, a raucous crowd eventually filled nearly every one of the 10,000 seats, with more people standing in the aisles and on the floor of the arena. They donned Bernie buttons and chanted “Feel the Bern” while they waited for Mr. Sanders to take the stage. If the Clinton campaign is worried about anyone in the Democratic field at this stage, it would seem to be Mr. Sanders—not the more mainstream, camera-ready Mr. O’Malley. Speaking Friday in New Hampshire, Mrs. Clinton appeared to have Mr. Sanders in mind when she said: “I take a back seat to no one when you look at my record of standing up and fighting for progressive values.” Meantime, polling shows Mr. O’Malley’s path to the nomination is getting tougher. A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll last month showed him with just 2% support among registered voters planning to vote in the Democratic primary. Mr. Sanders had 15%; Mrs. Clinton, 75%. Asked if they could see themselves supporting Mr. O’Malley, 12% said yes and 28% said no. “He’s not a shouter,” Jim Kessler, a senior vice president at the centrist think tank Third Way, said of Mr. O’Malley. “He’s a thoughtful and in some ways ponderous person…He doesn’t come across as much of a real populist. The message doesn’t come naturally to him.” On the campaign trail, Mr. O’Malley seems to recognize the hurdles he faces. Appearing at a house party in Ames, Iowa, after his visit to Carroll, he told the crowd his name—not something Mrs. Clinton ever needs to do. He ran through the offices he’s held and other bits of biography before drawing contrasts with his rivals. It seems clear from his stump speech that he wants to eclipse Mr. Sanders as the liberal challenger to Mrs. Clinton. He stresses the parts of his gubernatorial record that would most appeal to the left, telling how he signed legislation imposing stricter gun controls in Maryland, legalizing same-sex marriage and raising the state’s minimum wage. “I have fearless progressive values,” Mr. O’Malley said in Ames. He suggests that having enacted such measures he has a level of accomplishment that eludes Mr. Sanders, a legislator working in a polarized Congress. Asked how his brand of liberalism differs from that of Mr. Sanders, Mr. O’Malley told reporters in Carroll: “I’ve actually gotten these things done.” *Sanders snags key endorsement in New Hampshire <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/04/politics/bernie-sanders-dudley-dudley-endorsement-new-hampshire/> // CNN // Cassie Spodak – July 4, 2015* Wolfeboro, New Hampshire (CNN)Sen. Bernie Sanders has snagged a key endorsement in New Hampshire that may sting a little for Martin O'Malley's campaign. Longtime New Hampshire Democratic activist Dudley Dudley told CNN Friday that she has decided to endorse Bernie Sanders for the Democratic 2016 nomination. Her decision comes less than two months after she hosted O'Malley at both her Durham, New Hampshire homes. Since then, according to a recent CNN/WMUR New Hampshire primary poll, frontrunner Hillary Clinton's lead over Sanders has shrunk from 38 percentage points to 8, with O'Malley trailing both. Likely Democratic primary voters are now more apt to see Sanders as the candidate who "best represents the values of Democrats like yourself," the poll found. Sanders recently finished a two-day swing through the state that saw 500-person crowds and high attendance at more intimate house parties. Dudley told CNN she was won over by Sanders focus on money in politics, but was particularly impressed by his style of delivering his message. "He's very believable. A lot of people seem to say a lot of things that don't come to pass. I feel that he is compelling and trustworthy and I'm hoping that he will get the nomination," Dudley told CNN. "I particularly like what he has to say about Citizens United, about the need to have a more just tax system in this country, and to even out the income inequality. He has a way of stating it in a way that is no nonsense and so straight forward." Sanders' campaign spokesperson Michael Briggs told CNN, "We are very grateful and appreciate the support from such a key figure in New Hampshire." O'Malley's camp declined to comment on the endorsement. As a state executive councilor in the 1970s, Dudley was the highest serving woman in the state's history. She also gained a reputation as a grassroots activist when she led a successful effort to stop the building of an oil refinery off the coast of New Hampshire. During a house party on May 13, Dudley spoke positively about O'Malley, but told reporters after that event that while she opened her home, she was not ready to endorse. O'Malley returned the kind words for Dudley and spent a considerable amount of time wooing the Democratic activists. In addition to the event, O'Malley filmed key portions of his announcement video at Dudley's house. Dudley said Friday that her Sanders endorsement is not so much about what other Democratic candidates are lacking, but about how Sanders has differentiated himself in the field. "It wasn't in opposition to them. I'm just feeling that I like the way Sanders presents himself and puts his points of view," Dudley told CNN. Dudley acknowledges that Sanders' road to the White House, let alone the Democratic nomination, will not be easy. "Neither (race) is going to be a cakewalk, but I think that his stamina and energy and points of view will carry him through," she said. Dudley has had mixed success in endorsements over the years. In 2008, she supported Barack Obama in the lead-up to the New Hampshire primary, but in 1992 she supported Paul Tsongas over Bill Clinton, and in 1980, she spearheaded an unsuccessful challenge to incumbent President Jimmy Carter with a write-in campaign for Ted Kennedy. *Bernie Sanders Gains on Clinton in Early-State Polls, Hits Iowa Patriotic Parade Circuit <http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/07/04/bernie_sanders_pulls_closer_to_hillary_in_polls_spends_long_weekend_in_iowa.html> // Slate // Beth Ethier – July 4, 2015* On Saturday night, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders wrapped up a three-day charm offensive that took him through a half-dozen counties in Iowa. He brought standing-room crowds to small-town cafes and his Fourth of July schedule was packed with parades, with hours spent carrying banners with small armies in matching Bernie shirts and shaking hands in a state where his standing in the polls seems to be growing by the day. Sanders didn't manage to replicate the astonishing turnout that packed his rally in a Madison, Wisconsin arena this week, if only because venues that size are harder to find down in Iowa, but his 2,500-strong crowd in Council Bluffs on Friday is reportedly the largest so far of any 2016 candidate who's visited the state. Conceding in their headline that "OK, now Hillary Clinton seems to have some problems in Iowa," the Fix laid out poll numbers showing that Sanders' impressive crowds seem to be driven by a trend upward in support, at least in Iowa. Clinton still has a 19-point lead over Sanders in the state, 52-33, in the latest Quinnipiac poll, but that's not great news for a candidate who was ahead by 45 in May. Sanders is gaining Iowa's support largely at Clinton's expense, not only from voters who identify themselves as very liberal but also from women. Clinton is showing "a 12-point drop among women, in a poll with a margin of error of 3.6 points," Philip Bump writes for the Fix. "It's real." In Lebanon, New Hampshire on Friday, the Union Leader reports that Clinton tried gamely to treat the press corps to ice cream but was met instead with questions about the adoring fans following around her closest competitor, who's within single digits in some recent New Hampshire polling. Clinton had just come from an event at Dartmouth College in Hanover at which 850 people turned out. The turnout was high for a Clinton campaign stop in New Hampshire this go round, but nothing compared to the reported 10,000 people who turned out to see Sanders at a campaign stop in Wisconsin on Wednesday. When asked for her reaction to Sanders' big crowds and why she is not drawing the same numbers, she simply said, "We each run our own campaigns and I always knew it would be competitive. I want to have free debate in the primary and caucuses around the country." Clinton booster Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri went on MSNBC's Morning Joe last week to downplay Bernie's large crowds, saying that "Well, you know, Rand Paul’s father got massive crowds, Ron Paul. He got the same size crowds. Pat Buchanan got massive crowds. It's not unusual for someone who has an extreme message to have a following." Even if McCaskill is right about that, there's still a cautionary tale in the Ron Paul example: the participatory structure of the Iowa caucuses allowed Paul's noisy faction to effectively stage a coup on the leadership of the state Republican party in 2012. With a chance that Sanders has both noise and numbers in his favor, and with seven months left for him to win over voters in Iowa, Hillary should resist the urge to be dismissive of his newest fans as extremists and fanatics and start plotting to win them back to her side. *Sanders encouraged by Iowa crowds, rising polls <http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/07/04/bernie-sanders-july-fourth-parade-waukee/29719545/> // Des Moines Register // Kevin Hardy – July 4, 2015* On the tail end of a three-day Iowa swing, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders says he's feeling good about his momentum here and across the country. More than 150 supporters marched with Sanders on Saturday in Waukee's Independence Day parade, the last of his eight Iowa stops this week. "It's very gratifying to have so many people here in Waukee marching with me," said Sanders, an independent vying for the Democratic nomination for president. "I think our message is getting through. People are tired of seeing our great middle class disappear." In Iowa, Sanders has railed against money's influence on politics, big banks and the "billionaire class," while at the same time pitching policies to help strengthen the middle class, such as increasing the minimum hourly wage to $15, providing free college for all, rolling out a massive federal jobs program and making health care a universal right through a single-payer system. "I think people want to see a change in the way we do economics, make our economic system work for working families and not just for billionaires," Sanders told reporters Saturday. The senator's Iowa trip comes as national polls show him cutting into Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton's lead. "Two or three months ago, not a lot of people here in Iowa knew who Bernie Sanders was or what our message was about," Sanders said. "I think it does indicate we're gaining some good momentum and I look forward to seeing it continue." Sanders is drawing record crowds. On Wednesday night, more than 10,000 people attended his rally in Madison, Wisconsin, and nearly 2,500 attended a Friday evening event in Council Bluffs — the biggest Iowa crowd of any 2016 presidential contender yet. Sanders said he likes his chances in Iowa's first-in-the-nation caucuses. "I think there's a lot of support and I think momentum is with us," he said. In Waukee, Sanders led about 155 supporters who marched behind him. They chanted "Bernie, Bernie," donned "Bern Unit" shirts and cleverly inserted his name into a number of musical tunes. "Bern, Bern, Bern, Bern is the word," they sang together to the tune of The Trashmen's 1963 hit, "Surfin' Bird." Some parade-goers seemed surprised by Sanders' following. "Wow, look at all those people," one woman said. "Dear God." Sanders drew both traditional Democrats and conservatives on Saturday. "This will be the first time I've caucused with the Democrats," said Michael Tallman, 25, of Des Moines. Tallman, who works in banking, said Sanders seems like a candidate who will represent all people — rich or poor, male or female, gay or straight. He said many millennials are disturbed by the current political process and they could be key to boosting Sanders' shot at winning. "I think he has a real chance," Tallman said. "We've seen it happen before." Micheal Davenport, 35, of Des Moines said he generally votes conservatively. But he marched in support of Sanders Saturday. Davenport is an anti-abortion Catholic (Sanders is staunchly pro-abortion rights). But Davenport said Pope Francis' call for tolerance and more moderate rhetoric surrounding social issues has made him rethink some issues. "There's an interesting synchronicity between the Pope and Bernie," said Davenport, who works in security and is going back to school to become a teacher. Davenport relates to Sanders stances on economic issues, which he says are just more pressing now than social issues. "He's got the big mo," he said. "Great momentum." AT THE EVENT SETTING: Waukee Independence Day parade CROWD: About 155 marching in parade REACTION: Mills Roberts, 59, of West Des Moines said he's impressed with Sanders, whose rising stock is reminiscent of Barack Obama's come-from-behind campaign in 2008. "It has a little bit of that feel," he said as a crowd swarmed around the candidate shouting "Bernie, Bernie, Bernie." OTHER STOPS: Creston Independence Day parade WHAT'S NEXT: With his Iowa trip complete, Sanders will hold a campaign event in Maine on Monday. The senator has a fundraiser planned for July 16 in Washington and is scheduled to be in Iowa again July 17 for the Democratic Party's hall of fame celebration in Cedar Rapids. For details, go to DesMoines Register.com/candidate tracker. *‘Feel the Bern’: Activists spearhead Bernie Sanders social push <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/feel-the-bern-activists-spearhead-bernie-sanders-social-push> // MSNBC // Eric Levitz – July 4, 2015* Bernie Sanders may trail Hillary Clinton by double digits in New Hampshire, but he leads the Democratic front-runner by more than 4,000 “points” on Twitter. Between June 25 and July 1, the most popular hashtag associated with the Vermont senator’s presidential campaign, “#feelthebern,” was tweeted an average of 6,800 times-a-day, while “#hillary2016” garnered 2,700 tweets, according to Topsy, which tracks activity on social media. The insurgent candidate’s campaign picked up some momentum over the past week, too. Last Wednesday, Sanders made headlines by drawing 10,000 supporters to a campaign event in Madison, Wisconsin – the largest crowd assembled by any candidate so far this year. The following day, his campaign announced that it had raised $15 million since April 30, and a Quinnipiac poll showed Sanders gaining ground in the early voting state of Iowa. Still, by the candidate’s own estimation, it would take nothing short of a “political revolution” for Sanders to win the 2016 Democratic primary. Unable to compete with Clinton in fundraising or name recognition, Sanders will need to make social media fervor matter more than it ever has in an American election. Winnie Wong and Charles Lenchner are spearheading that “revolution.” Veteran political organizers, Wong and Lenchner created the #feelthebern hashtag and co-founded People for Bernie Sanders, a digital platform where the senator’s supporters can network and organize outreach efforts both online and off. Through those efforts, People For Bernie has already enlisted 10,000 campaign volunteers, according to its organizers. Wong believes that social media will play a greater role in 2016 than it has in any prior election. “While I enjoy Quinnipiac polls, and watch them closely, I think there’s a huge piece of data that they miss,” Wong told msnbc. “In 2015, we have huge numbers of people taking to the internet to discuss everything. And those conversations will affect the outcome of the 2016 elections.” To put Sanders at the center of those conversations, People for Bernie works with data analysts to track the success of their hashtags and map the reach of their most influential Twitter supporters. But behind such technical pursuits is an idealistic faith in the power of social media to expand democratic engagement – faith born of Wong and Lechner’s experiences in New York City’s Zuccotti Park in 2011. “Many of us are graduates of Occupy Wall Street,” Lenchner told msnbc. “And we feel like there’s an enormous cohort of people that are disillusioned with the limited range of choices in American politics. We’re committed to expanding the number and kinds of people that assert their power within the democratic system.” “Bernie is taking donations from people and from unions. There’s no bull****. He’s raising money from people, not corporations,” Wong added. To get a sense of the kind of anti-corporate voter that Wong and Lenchner wish to reach, Google the name “Killer Mike.” People For Bernie first reached out to the rapper from the popular group Run The Jewels in late May, tweeting to his account, “We hope that you decide to #feeltheBern. Any Q’s feel free to hit us up.” Killer Mike – whose actual name is Michael Render – invited them to send more information. People for Bernie provided him with campaign memes and links to articles about Sanders’ policy positions. Last Monday, Killer Mike endorsed Sanders for president, telling his 149,000 Twitter followers, “I cannot support another Clinton or Bush ever. I am beginning to see American political families like monarchs and I have no affection for monarchs.” The fact that Sanders – the 2016 campaign’s oldest candidate – is beloved on social media would seem more ironic if it weren’t so familiar. In both 2008 and 2012, the elderly libertarian Rep. Ron Paul enjoyed a similarly energetic online following, while drawing similarly large, impassioned crowds to his campaign events. But that enthusiastic support proved too narrow to carry Paul anywhere near his party’s nomination. Some have called Sanders the left-wing version of Paul, and expect his campaign to run a similar course. But Lenchner argues that there’s a key distinction between the two candidates – unlike Paul, Sanders’ central policy positions actually enjoy broad public support. “Ron Paul’s signature’s issue was the Federal Reserve and monetary policy, and I would say that’s esoteric for most people,” Lenchner said. “That’s of a different caliber than Bernie’s issues – There’s too much inequality. We should take care of our veterans. We should allow our students to graduate without being in debt servitude. These are not complicated issues to explain.” Still, Lenchner doesn’t mind the comparison with the Paul campaign. While the former Texas congressman failed to win his party’s nomination, Lenchner believes his candidacy helped promote a libertarian view of criminal justice reform that has since gained traction within the GOP. Ultimately, Wong and Lenchner are as concerned with promoting Sanders’ policies as they are with promoting his candidacy. Both are veterans of the campaign to draft Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren into the Democratic presidential primary race, and believe that the threat of her candidacy forced Clinton to run on a significantly more progressive platform in 2016 than she did in 2008. Sanders’ candidacy has already brought mainstream media attention to proposals like free public college and a 90% top marginal tax-rate – policies that were far outside the left-pole of the 2012 debate. “The traditional political game is one in which we’re presented with a really narrow range of options,” Lenchner said. “And expanding that range isn’t a strategy in order to do something – it’s one of the goals of politics itself.” *Our Bernie Sanders moment: This July 4, remember only true independence and revolution ever brings change <http://www.salon.com/2015/07/04/our_bernie_sanders_moment_this_july_4_remember_only_true_independence_and_revolution_ever_brings_change/> // Salon // Patrick L. Smith – July 4, 2015* One of the things progressives often get wrong has to do with how fundamental change comes about. The standard reasoning is that people are stirred when they hit the bottom of the bottom—a condition of diminished expectations. It takes an economic depression, or a lot of political repression, to prompt people to rise. We need things to get worse before they get better. Let the suffering come. This appears to be an entirely logical dialectic. But politics as desperation, as we might call the thought, rarely, if ever, proves out. Almost always it turns out to be an error. Follow this line, and you want the Kochs to smash what remains of the political process to smithereens. You want the Supreme Court handing down ever more irrational judgments, you want more cops-in-camo shooting African-Americans, you want more unemployment and more reckless ambition among the foreign policy cliques. Then, you declare, people will be stirred out of the stupefied apathy that grips this nation. We ought to ask ourselves this July 4 the extent to which we are given to this argument. Speaking only for myself, I made the mistake too many times too many years ago not to have learned how wrong it is. Those who, in another time, made revolution their work knew better. It is amid rising expectations, not falling, that people are most likely to exert themselves in pursuit of authentic change. The key to this truth, I have always thought, lies in a people’s consciousness of themselves. It is when they get some worthy things done, and so realize the power they possess, that they use it to effect change with true dedication. Nineteenth century Europe offers many examples making the point. If I have my history right, the Russian revolution is a classic case. (And so is the Berlin Wall’s fall.) But there is no need to go further than the event we now celebrate, thoughtfully or thoughtlessly as the case may be, to find an irrefutable demonstration of the point. Let’s ask ourselves this July 4: What exactly was on the minds of the signers gathered in Philadelphia 239 summers ago this weekend? Was George III’s boot on the colonists’ necks the primary sensation? The Declaration was the original American case of politics as desperation? It was all about the Stamp Act, the taxes on tea, the Boston Massacre? Wrong read, obviously. The Declaration was a statement of principle reflecting the confidence of people who had the Boston Tea Party, the First Continental Congress, the battles of Lexington and Concord, the Second Continental Congress and Bunker Hill immediately behind them. In Jefferson’s handwriting they read of a future that they understood would belong to them. The document exudes determination in its very cadences. I mention this for a reason that may be plain by now. As anyone who pays attention knows, we have just witnessed at least two very significant political advances and probably a third. Suddenly, the expectations of many millions are rising. The gay marriage and health care decisions, handed down by the worst, most corruptly biased Supreme Court to sit in my lifetime, suggest that those judges who are nothing more than creatures of conservative ideology and corporate interests recognized that they would risk a national revolt had they ruled the other way on these questions. This is my read. What will come of the Charleston murders is still to be determined. But we have already seen an extraordinary display of solidarity and restraint as a forms of power among South Carolina blacks close to the African Methodist Episcopal Church, and it looks like this could eventually drive the worst of Old Dixie down. The point not to be missed: We reach this national day with the wind at last at our backs and the road coming up to meet us, as the Irish say. I see a momentum in the cause of a progressive redefinition of what it means to be American that seemed little more than delusion or a faded memory but a few years ago, so thoroughly did the American right appear to triumph in the name of a perverse notion of patriotism. Expectations rise. Returning to my original thought, a chance to get still more done, created by way of a lot of sacrifice and hard work, presents itself. What will people do with it? This is our question—not least because the 2016 election draws near, and I will return to these. A little autobiography here. In many years abroad I often looked back and thought I saw some salutary impulse to resist the marketization of the political process and the commodification of all culture at the hands of corporations possessed of a conscienceless greed. It seemed just under the surface, waiting to break through. Then I would return on home leave and find everyone kicking the dirt. Talk about diminished expectations. An assumption of powerlessness was everywhere I looked. I found it hard to be around. I had to put what I thought I saw from afar down to illusion, or an incurable streak of optimism wholly in the American grain. What about Obama’s victory in 2008, you ask. Yes, it seemed at the time a confirmation of the perceptions I describe. I have said this before in this space: I wept tears of joy when McCain capitulated—11 in the morning where I was. But soon enough, the cold, hard judgment rendered by the late, estimable Alex Cockburn seemed more the case: The junior senator was too pretty for his own good, Cockburn wrote before the election, and would never get his hands dirty. A revised, altogether complicated take on Obama will have to get written, given how things have just turned, but it no longer seems I was so wrong as all that. What I thought I saw now takes form. The events of the past couple of weeks have been crystallizing in this respect. I leave the foreign side out of this, you will note. It is the dark side of Obama’s moon by any reasonable reckoning. At writing, there are one and a half exceptions. Yes, the opening to Cuba is a triumphant stroke. (I wept the morning that was announced, too, half a century’s suffering at American hands finally ended.) Iran may come good, depending on how Secretary of State Kerry does in the final days of negotiations on a deal governing the Iranian nuclear program. But Cuba is as nothing next to the truly strategic blunders—Russia, Ukraine, Iraq redux, a god-awful misinterpretation of China and its intent and now NATO unbound. By the same token, any Iran deal will be purposely shorn of its proper significance: An agreement with Tehran should open out to a broad rapprochement, so altering numerous dysfunctional relationships, not least Washington’s with Israel. But the White House is already clear that no such potential is to be explored. What Obama wants is primarily to assuage the Israeli right wing, and that is the wrong ambition. It has already cost Egyptians their first attempt at democratic government. So the Cold War ends in Cuba and begins again on Russia’s western border and across the Pacific. Status quo in the Middle East. This is the Obama record on the foreign side. I count it an appalling legacy. I do not think we can forget this when celebrating the past couple of weeks’ good news at home. In this there is a lesson in the Obama presidency, and I will return to it shortly. For now, a couple of things that should be considered next to the crystallizing events of the past couple of weeks. One is the unexpected (at least among many of us) success of Bernie Sanders since the Vermont senator announced he would run for the Democratic nomination. The other, of considerable importance if of somewhat lesser magnitude, was a remarkable piece published recently on this site called “Hillary Clinton is going to lose: She doesn’t even see the frustrated progressive wave that will nominate Bernie Sanders.” Numerous students of American politics argue now that Sanders cannot win the nomination and is even further from carrying the election next year; he is important because he shows how weak Hillary is. As of now, both of these judgments seem right. But I hold to “as of now.” One, Sanders trails Clinton by a startlingly small margin in one poll after another. Two, you do not want to underestimate the power of rising expectations. Think again of the signers in Philadelphia and the events that propelled them there over a very short period. Political landscapes can change very quickly. Listen to what Sanders has to say. To me it is perfectly clear, and I doubt he would be so shy of the language as American politicians customarily are: He is talking about a social democratic America, which is not a new idea. It is a 19th century idea buried and made “un-American” by very bad Americans posing as patriots. In terms deployed previously in this space and in the books noted at this column’s end, Sanders is talking about a demythologized America, a nation free of its exceptionalist tradition, one wherein we understand ourselves and what we do in historical terms. Myth or history: In my view, absolutely no distinction is more important now. At bottom, it is putting this question in front of us, if only implicitly, that makes Sanders important. As to the Salon piece just noted, it is remarkable not only for its argument but also for who makes it. Read it here. Bill Curry was an adviser to Bill Clinton and twice ran for governor on the Democratic ticket in Connecticut. And here he is asserting, “There’s a rumbling out there, but most Democrats are a long way from hearing it, let alone joining in.” Curry’s piece astonished me for its to-the-point pith when I read it and has captivated me ever since. Here we have a mainstreamer and one-time White House insider identifying a progressive groundswell—his word—that has often seemed illusory because virtually no one in power dared acknowledge it. In effect, Curry pierces a conspiracy of silence, just as Sanders does. More than this, Curry thinks this now-evident current in American politics is already strong enough to tip Hillary over. None of us can forecast with authority at this early moment. What interests me is the power Curry assigns those who want to see authentic change and who see Hillary Clinton for precisely what she is: treacherously awful, whose nomination would amount to a political blight. Hillary would do one thing with the expectations now rising among Americans: Foil them, crush them, pervert them, turn them bitter. Take your pick, they all amount to the same thing. I got off Hillary’s bus long ago. Anyone remember November 1999, when, as first lady, she traveled to the West Bank, where she lunched and exchanged ceremonial praises with Suha Arafat, the late Yasser’s wife? On departing she kissed Suha Arafat on the cheek—a kiss of Judas straight out of Matthew, for when Clinton arrived in Jerusalem to shrieks of protest, she thought nothing of denouncing Arafat and effectively denying the gesture of friendship made a matter of hours earlier. Unforgivable, but that is Hillary. Opportunism incarnate is all I see. To be honest, until Sanders announced his candidacy I could not think of a single reason to vote. We were offered no choice. In pursuing the Democratic nomination, Sanders has craftily averted all the “don’t split the vote” rubbish one heard when Ralph Nader ran as the candidate of the Greens, the Vermont Progressives and the United Citizens Party. This is exceptionally astute. There is nothing better than winning, but a close second in the current American context is pushing candidates with alternative politics in voters’ faces and forcing them to think about what they have to say. Such candidates have a cumulative effect, in other words, that can take several election cycles to play out. The rapid pace of recent events notwithstanding, we have to think in terms of a generational project, it seems to me. In repudiating Nader in 2000, those who may otherwise have supported him missed this, so that when the election was over, George W. the victor, Democrats were at square one, no ground gained, as there could have been, in the course of the defeat. I would support Sanders on this basis alone. In a phrase, he speaks to the groundswell. He is rising expectations, so obvious on this 239th anniversary, made flesh. And in this Sanders stands more or less alone among holders of high office for the moment, unless we count the reticent Elizabeth Warren. And here is the lesson the Obama administration leaves us with. As expectations rise by way of big victories, we do not need another gradualist who comes out of the policy cliques, or is too weak to resist them, and is hence available to be betrayed in their internecine wars for power. If the successes of the past few weeks tell us anything, it is that transformers, not transitioners, are required if we are to make sense of our time. Obama wanted to be the former but has turned out the latter. More broadly, we must begin to identify mythologizers and exceptionalists, no matter their professed stripe—and Hillary and her former boss are of this type. And we must recognize the historicists among us, such as Bernie Sanders. If this is what sets Sanders fundamentally apart, I urge we learn from him the importance of the distinction: Unless Americans master the exceptionalist impulse and dispose of all its attendant rhetoric, no battle worth fighting can be decisively won. Genuine Americans are critical Americans. This is by definition. And they are unceasingly critical of the definition itself. Critical Americans just handed us some excellent news. Happy 4th to them, especially. *The Times Doctrine on Bernie Sanders <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-bromwich/the-times-doctrine-on-ber_b_7728470.html> // HuffPo // David Bromwich – July 4, 2015* On the fourth of July, the New York Times gave its readers a first extended look at the political history of Bernie Sanders in Vermont. The article, by Sarah Lyall, is titled "Bernie Sanders's Revolutionary Roots Were Nurtured in '60s Vermont." This sketch of the young Sanders is free of obvious malice. It would serve its purpose less effectively if it were malicious. The attitude that Lyall adopts toward Senator Sanders is, instead, mildly and cheerfully disparaging -- affectionate, but at the proper distance of condescension; ironically agreeable, as you are allowed to be in dealing with a second cousin or an eccentric uncle who is a bit of a blowhard. Hers is not the first such article to appear on Sanders in the Times. Is it safe to predict that this will remain the paper's approach to his campaign for as long as he stays in the race? Though malice is absent, the pejorative shading here begins with the title. Does Sanders today describe himself as a revolutionist? "Revolutionary roots" implies that he does. Sanders indeed calls himself a democratic socialist. But it was a pretty steady difference between socialists and communists, throughout the twentieth century, that socialists would choose not to describe themselves as revolutionists. They were radical reformers and tended to reject the path of violence that revolutionists embrace. "Radical reformist roots" would have made a truer but a less eye-catching headline. Symptomatic excerpts from the article follow in boldface, with my comments in italics: [The young Bernie Sanders] came to Vermont in the late 1960s to help plan the upending of the old social order. Did he in fact come to Vermont with a detailed plan? The word suggests that Sanders was a bit deluded. More likely, he came to Vermont with no plan except to organize and reform: something that people with political convictions have been known to do. The word "upending" is curious. It comes from football: a linebacker who tackles a charging halfback by a grabbing his ankles and tossing him head-over-heels is said to upend him. You can't do that to something as heterogeneous and extended as American society. The word suggests as much without having to say so. But it is unlikely that he ever used the word "upend"; once again, the relevant missing word and idea is reform. +++ [A youthful article by Sanders in the Vermont Freeman gave] an apocalyptically alarmist account of the unbearable horror of having an office job in New York City. The pileup of "apocalyptically alarmist" and "unbearable horror" triggers the sarcasm. You can almost hear the unwritten sequel: "An office job in New York City? Give me a break." Various personalities of the era - Bob Dylan, Simon and Garfunkel -- seem to have shared the sentiments of the young Sanders, but the incredulous adverb and adjectives do their work. +++ Chalk some of this up to being young and unemployed. Mr. Sanders, now 73, has had a steady, nonrevolutionary job for quite some time now. It is the usual dig. Resistance and protest come from dissatisfaction and failure; get a decent job and watch how your politics change. +++ ... barely 30, full of restless energy, with wild curly hair, a brash Brooklyn manner and a mind fizzing with plans to remake the world. Short on money but long on ideas... Human-interest writing may come disguised as biography but it performs that duty imperfectly. The fizzing mind is there because it rhymes with the frizzy hair. "Short on money but long on ideas" is a cliché so lazy that the barb is robbed of its sting. +++ [Sanders's description of himself as a freelance writer] is a bit of a stretch. A look through his journalistic output, such as it was, reveals that he had perhaps a dozen articles published. How many articles do you have to publish to qualify as a freelance writer? Two dozen? The pedantry is polemical. +++ [In a 1972 article by Sanders, the] opening passage, which deals with men's sexual fantasies, is meant to be satirically provocative but comes across as crassly sexist. The article was reprinted in Mother Jones, and readers are free to check their impressions against Lyall's description. It opens with a suggestion that men too often fantasize themselves as rapists and women fantasize being raped: the pleasurable compulsiveness of the fantasies testifies to the sickness sex in American society. However shallow or wrong this speculation, Lyall's characterization of it as "crassly sexist" is false. The title, "Man -- And Woman," is enough to indicate the perspective. Men think of women as an afterthought, the young Sanders was saying, and that is our mistake. The article declares that the typical male vice is "pigness" while the typical female vice is "slavishness." It advises men to stop being pigs and women to stop being slaves. Lyall says that this early article has drawn "unflattering attention," but her only link online yields a brief Times paragraph which alludes to criticism "bouncing around social media." In fact, the unflattering attention has mostly come from right-wing corporate and pro-war sites -- Town Hall, National Review, The Weekly Standard, Breitbart -- whose reasons for undermining Sanders are remote from feminism. +++ "Sexual adjustment seemed to be very poor in those with cancer of the cervix," [Sanders] wrote, quoting a study in a journal called Psychosomatic Medicine. "Wrote, quoting": but if he quoted it, he didn't write it. This is meant to emphasize again the supposed oddity of Sanders's sexual attitudes, but it should never have passed editing. +++ He also made a half-hour film about his hero, Eugene V. Debs, the labor organizer who ran unsuccessfully for president five times. What a peculiar fellow to have as a hero. The conjunction of "unsuccessfully" and "five times" makes Debs an average union organizer and a serial failure: he couldn't stop running for president. Not a word about Debs going to prison for his opposition to American involvement in the First World War. Would it be different -- and perhaps fairer -- to speak of Eugene V. Debs as "the union leader who founded the Social Democratic Party of America"? Of course, that would open up a weakness or two in the story of Sanders's hopeless eccentricity. None of this is likely to change as the contest of ideas in the presidential race grows warmer. "What contest," you may ask. The Republican field has drawn amused regard from the mainstream media for its array of qualified and unqualified candidates -- the former seeking ever more assiduously to resemble the latter -- with its apparent consensus that climate change is a hoax and that we should have more wars, less immigration, no unions, and work together to facilitate the extinction of public education. The exception is Rand Paul, with his explicit criticism of mass warrantless surveillance and of the Iraq and Libya wars. The Democrats have been saved from embarrassment by showing little interest in public discussion and only the beginnings of a debate. With the exception of Bernie Sanders: His announcement of his candidacy and his early speeches in Wisconsin and Iowa have shown no slackening in the force of his attacks on Wall Street and the big corporations. His voice today speaks almost alone for a wide dissatisfaction among the electorate with our politics generally, and the popular jealousy of the vested interests that for two decades have dictated policy and set the limits of reform far beyond the area of free trade and the bank interest rates. Public opinion must be controlled, domesticated, shepherded, and the dissatisfactions made somehow laughable. Every amusing and dismissive report on a figure like Sanders or Paul goes to serve that larger purpose. *Bernie Sanders Sets A 2016 Record By Drawing A Huge Overflow Crowd In Iowa <http://www.politicususa.com/2015/07/04/bernie-sanders-sets-2016-record-drawing-huge-overflow-crowd-iowa.html> // Politicus // Jason Easley – July 4, 2015* Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders set a new record in Iowa by drawing an overflow crowd of 2,600 to a venue that only had 2,300 chairs. The biggest Iowa crowd so far for any presidential candidate turned out on a Friday night in Council Bluffs to hear Bernie Sanders ask them to join a new American political revolution to reclaim the government of the United States from the billionaire class. At least 2,600 people filled the 2,300 chairs at the Mid-America Convention Center and stood at the rear of the cavernous convention hall. It was a remarkable turnout on the eve of Saturday’s Fourth of July celebration as the Bernie called on them to join a mass movement to restore the once-great American middle class. They cheered when he called for raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour. They applauded when he said it’s time to break up the big banks on Wall Street. They shouted approval when he credited Pope Francis for his call for bold action to prevent catastrophic climate change. They rose to their feet when he said the United States should join every other major country and provide health care as a right of citizenship. The recent Quinnipiac Poll that showed Sanders gaining on Hillary Clinton in Iowa looks like it was no fluke. Bernie Sanders is setting attendance records where ever he goes. Sen. Sanders has more grassroots enthusiasm for his campaign than any Republican candidate, yet the media continues to give airtime to clowns and controversy mongers like Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and Mike Huckabee. At some point, the press must be forced to wake up and realize that the issues that Bernie Sanders is talking about are the ones that matter to the American people. When the media ignores Bernie Sanders, they are ignoring the concerns of hard-working Americans. By filling up arena and venues around the country when Sanders comes to their towns, the American people are forcing the corporate owned media to pay attention. *How Bernie Sanders threatens to derail Hillary’s coronation <http://nypost.com/2015/07/05/how-bernie-sanders-threatens-to-derail-hillarys-coronation/> // NY Post // Michael Goodwin – July 5, 2015* Trying to create a presidential persona and a rationale for running, Hillary Clinton relaunched her campaign at a memorial to FDR. She used the glorious setting of Four Freedoms Park to summon Roosevelt’s legacy and frame her theme as “Four Fights.” She also invoked her husband and President Obama, as if piggy-backing on presidents would define her. Perhaps it will work, but her predicament recalls a Dem president she didn’t mention: Lyndon Baines Johnson. The similarities must scare her. LBJ looked certain to be re-elected in 1968, until a Minnesota senator with a penchant for poetry named Eugene McCarthy shocked the world by getting 42 percent in the New Hampshire primary, against Johnson’s 49 percent. Less than three weeks later, the president famously declared that “I shall not seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of my party for another term as your president.” If there is a McCarthy-like figure on the scene today, it is Bernie Sanders, the scrappy underdog threatening to upset Hillary’s coronation. The news that Sanders is surging in polls in Iowa and New Hampshire must be sending shivers through Clinton’s camp. Even though Hillary still leads in the 2016 first states, the gap has narrowed so much that her surrogates are lowering expectations, saying Sanders might win some showdowns. That’s amazing enough, but her problem could be even more serious. Echoing the Mark Twain line that “history doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme,” the Clinton-Sanders dynamic is starting to rumble like the political earthquake of ’68. LBJ’s demise is a textbook example of how quickly the bubble can burst. He had the power of incumbency while Hillary wears the mantle of inevitability. That didn’t work for her in 2008, either, when Obama emerged to crash her party. Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, doesn’t need to win the nomination — and he probably won’t — to block Clinton. He only need show that she’s not inevitable, and that there is a motivated, significant piece of the party that rejects her. That is exactly what he’s doing, as large, enthusiastic crowds greet him wherever he goes. If she looks beatable, more viable candidates will find the courage to run. That’s the McCarthy model. He ran as a dissident against the Vietnam War and the New Hampshire results in mid-March of ’68 crystallized unhappiness with Johnson. Nearly 20,000 American soldiers were dead by the end of 1967, and the election year would be the bloodiest of all. It started with a Jan. 1 attack on a US military base and February’s Tet Offensive saw the deadliest single week of the war, when 543 Americans were killed and more than 2,500 wounded. Overall, 16,899 of our soldiers died in 1968, the most in any year. In those dark days, many people, including top Democrats, grew disillusioned with Johnson, and McCarthy’s promise to end the conflict found special resonance among draft-age students. Shaggy anti-war protesters shaved and got haircuts in a “clean for Gene” movement. But the New Hampshire primary was McCarthy’s high-water mark. After Johnson bowed out, Bobby Kennedy jumped in, as did Vice President Hubert Humphrey. Kennedy probably would have won, but was assassinated in June by Palestinian terrorist Sirhan Sirhan. Humphrey got the nod at the Chicago convention, a debacle marked by violent street protests that helped Republican Richard Nixon win the presidency. For her part, Clinton already has veered left to head off a challenge from the progressive flank. But her long record as a relative military hawk who is cozy with Wall Street is proving a tough sell in a party increasingly more radical than she is. The anti-Hillary movement is also picking up steam because of her shady dealings with international oligarchs and the rivers of cash flowing to the Clinton Foundation. Never reliably honest, she’s been caught in lies about her e-mails as secretary of state, leading most voters to say she is untrustworthy. That, in turn, is keeping several GOP candidates ahead or close in hypothetical matchups. Although she remains the likely nominee, there are many dents in Clinton’s armor and a long way to go. By the end, 2016 could be the new 1968. Bratton is better than his word Bill Bratton’s bite is worse than his bark. That’s a very good thing for New York. With crime in June falling to its lowest level since at least 1993, the top cop is showing he still has a talent for miracles. Through May, murder was up nearly 20 percent. Bratton’s reaction then was a disappointment, writing in The Post that the “relatively minor increase” did not mean crime was “raging out of control.” He said he had a plan of action, but his lack of a clear promise sounded like he was preparing the city for a new normal of more violence. Thankfully, that has not happened. June’s numbers were dramatically lower than a year ago, with murders down 38 percent and fewer shootings, rapes, robberies and stolen cars. Beyond the obvious benefits, the stats are comforting because they prove the NYPD still can move quickly and make a life-saving difference despite the handcuffs and insults coming from City Hall. It’s just one month, but let’s hope this is the start of a new, downward trend. Congratulations to the commissioner and all the members of the NYPD. Once again, they showed why they are the Finest. Smith’s old wives tale Former state Senate leader Malcolm Smith had delusions of grandeur, boasting that he, President Obama and Gov. David Paterson all had wives named Michelle. The implication was that he, too, was bound for glory. His sentencing on federal bribery charges brought him back to earth with a thud. A Democrat, he was convicted of a scheme to buy his way onto the Republican mayoral ballot in 2013. Leaving court last week, Smith said only, “I thank God for the opportunity I’ve had to serve.” Presumably, he didn’t mean his time in prison, which was set at seven years. Oh, how the would-be mighty have fallen. Pataki plays his ‘Trump’ card Who’s afraid of Donald Trump? Apparently most of the GOP presidential candidates except George Pataki. Even as Republicans try to attract Latino voters, the former three-term New York governor broke the party’s shocking silence over Trump’s statement that Mexican immigrants are “bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.” In an open letter to competitors, Pataki said the comments “left me and a lot of other sensible people wondering what century we are living in,” and urged others to join him in denouncing them. Initially, only former Texas Gov. Rick Perry mumbled disagreement, but late Friday Marco Rubio finally denounced Trump’s comments as “offensive.” And yesterday, Jeb Bush chimed in, labeling Trump’s remarks “extraordinarily ugly.” Better late than never. Pataki is a long shot for the nomination, but his refreshing capacity for decency has not been dimmed by his time out of office. *WEBB* *Jim Webb Announces Presidential Bid; Only Democratic Candidate Opposed To Marriage Equality <http://www.ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=21160&MediaType=1&Category=26> // On Top // Carlos Santoscoy – July 4, 2015* Former Virginia Senator Jim Webb on Thursday announced his bid for the White House. Webb made his announcement in a 2,000-word Facebook post. “After many months of thought, deliberation and discussion, I have decided to seek the office of the Presidency of the United States,” Webb wrote. He said that he had decided to run because “our country needs a fresh approach to solving the problems that confront us and too often unnecessarily divide us. … And at the same time our fellow Americans need proven, experienced leadership that can be trusted to move us forward from a new President's first days in office.” Webb is the fifth candidate seeking the Democratic nomination. Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is considered the race's frontrunner. Also in the race are Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, former Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley and former Rhode Island Governor Lincoln Chafee. All of Webb's rivals support marriage equality. While Webb is generally supportive of LGBT rights, he has yet to officially change his stance favoring civil unions, not marriage, for gay and lesbian couples. During a 2014 appearance on Meet the Press, Webb said that the debate “has been a good thing for the country.” *CHAFEE* *Chafee's campaign leaves some NH Democrats a bit puzzled <http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article26483401.html> // Miami Herald // Michelle R. Smith – July 4, 2015* LACONIA, N.H. - Presidential candidate Lincoln Chafee stands before a few dozen people at a meeting of New Hampshire's Belknap County Democrats. The Republican-turned-independent-turned-Democrat gets nods of approval when he tells them he was the only Republican senator to vote against authorizing the war in Iraq. Then smiles turn to laughter when he pitches another idea: The U.S. should switch to the metric system. The former Rhode Island governor has visited the first primary state of New Hampshire a dozen times this year. But he seems to be making barely a ripple — aside from curiosity about some of his policy platforms. In Belknap County, at least some Democrats seemed intrigued by Chafee as someone who could represent an alternative to Hillary Rodham Clinton, the commanding favorite for the nomination. But they are also puzzled by what he talks about sometimes. Chafee told the group he wants to bring National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden home, dropping all charges against him. Paula Trombi of Meredith said she liked some of what he said but was taken aback and disappointed by his position on Snowden. She also can't understand why he keeps talking about the metric system, of all things. "With all the troubles that are going on, that seems almost odd to bring up," she said. Dave Kerr, a selectman in Barnstead, said he agreed with Chafee that billions have been spent on the war that could have been better spent on roads and schools. But Kerr was leaving with a poster and a donation envelope for another Democratic rival, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who also opposed the Iraq war. A Sanders supporter had handed them out, and Kerr wondered why Chafee hadn't, also. Chafee is known to dislike fundraising and is just starting to raise money for a race where spending is expected to be measured in the billions. His past campaigns — two Senate races as a Republican and a governor's race as an independent — have relied on an old New England family fortune amassed over generations. Dave Pollak, chairman of Belknap County Democrats, said he agreed with Chafee that Snowden is a whistleblower and should not be prosecuted. With Chafee's background in different parties, Pollak sees him as someone who could bridge the ideological divide between Democrats and Republicans. He even likes the metric system idea. But Pollak finds other aspects of Chafee's campaign peculiar. Clinton's campaign is in contact with the group every week inviting its members to events, has multiple campaign offices open and created specialty groups for supporters such as "High Schoolers for Hillary." The Sanders campaign sends regular "rousing" emails on issues, Pollak said. The campaign for another rival, former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, also has staff in the state. Chafee, on the other hand, has no campaign staff in New Hampshire yet and appears to be running on a shoestring. Although Chafee has a vacation home further north in Franconia, he said he hasn't been staying there during the campaign. Instead, he drives to his New Hampshire events from Rhode Island, a five-hour round trip this evening. He was back in Somersworth, New Hampshire, the following day. It makes Pollak wonder how serious he is. "What's the organization?" he asks. "What gives you confidence that he can get the voters out?" Chafee gets testy when asked about matters like that. He says it's an "evolutionary process." "You guys never ask anything about the substance," he told a reporter. "It's always about how many people, how much money have you raised. Ugh. "I wish there was more intellectual discussion about the issues in these campaigns." As he spoke, Chafee aide Jonathan Stevens handed out stickers saying "Trust Chafee." The design and motto are identical to the one from his 2010 campaign for governor. Asked if they're 2010 leftovers, Stevens replied, "We recycle everything." Stickers bearing this year's motto, "Fresh Ideas for America," were nowhere in sight. *UNDECLARED* *BIDEN* *The Joe Biden (mini-)boom <http://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/david-shribman/2015/07/05/David-M-Shribman-The-Joe-Biden-mini-boom/stories/201507050070> // Pittsburgh Post-Gazette // David M. Shribman – July 5, 2015* Suddenly everybody’s talking about Joe Biden. That itself is a phenomenon. The nation’s first vice president, John Adams, described the job in a letter to his wife as “the most insignificant office that ever the invention of man contrived or his imagination conceived,” and indeed he did little in it. Its later occupants — and here the names Daniel D. Tompkins, Richard Mentor Johnson, Henry Wilson and Charles W. Fairbanks come to mind only if you’re playing a particularly difficult trivia contest — have faded into the mists of history, forgettable and forgotten. But in recent years vice presidents have become important forces in American political life. As late as 1977, the vice presidency was a political backwater; titanic political figures such as former Senate majority leader Lyndon B. Johnson and former Gov. Nelson A. Rockefeller swiftly grew bored and depressed in the office. But all that changed when Sen. Walter F. Mondale of Minnesota negotiated an important role for the vice presidency as the price of joining former Gov. Jimmy Carter of Georgia on the 1976 Democratic ticket, and strong vice presidents such as Albert Gore Jr. and Richard B. Cheney further changed the profile of the office. And, in a major departure from American history, vice presidents recently have become formidable presidential candidates. Richard Nixon and Mr. Gore were in breathtakingly close presidential elections only to lose in disputed circumstances. George H.W. Bush ascended directly to the presidency. Mr. Mondale and Hubert H. Humphrey won tough battles for the Democratic presidential nomination but lost in the general election. The vice presidency has become a potent staging ground for a presidential campaign. Which is why Mr. Biden now is in the news again — not for what he has done but for what he might do. Today nobody has an inkling whether Mr. Biden will seek to ascend the greasy pole to the presidency. He is in deep mourning for his son, Beau Biden, who died at 46 in May, though the younger Mr. Biden (and his brother, Hunter) are thought to have hoped for a third Biden presidential candidacy. The first two, in 1988 and 2008, went nowhere, though Mr. Biden’s elder-statesman wisdom and generous spirit positioned him to become Barack Obama’s running mate in 2008. Makeshift draft-Biden efforts have launched in the early political states of Iowa and New Hampshire, but they do not have the heft of either the Ready for Hillary or the Run Warren Run organizations that were created for former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who now is running for president, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who apparently is not. They pale in comparison, moreover, with the Draft Eisenhower effort of 1951 and 1952, when the former supreme commander of Allied forces hadn’t even made clear whether he was a Republican or a Democrat. The question for 2016 is whether either the vice presidency or Mr. Biden himself have the advantages Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore possessed when they sought to go directly from the office to the White House. Mr. Bush is the only person after Martin Van Buren to make that leap since 1837. Mr. Nixon, a two-term vice president under Gen. Eisenhower, failed to do so in 1960, though he prevailed eight years later, defeating another vice president, Mr. Humphrey. None of the vice presidents who won presidential nominations began the race as far behind as Mr. Biden, nor did any face an established, perhaps even historic, rival with the profile of Ms. Clinton, wife of a onetime president, secretary of state to another and a U.S. senator. Mr. Biden is in single digits in the latest Iowa and New Hampshire polls, and Ms. Clinton holds a lead of nearly five-to-one over Mr. Biden in the RealClearPolitics survey. Until recent times, the presidential prospects of a vice president such as Mr. Biden would be considered remote. Though 13 vice presidents have become presidents, all but four of them ascended through the death or resignation of an incumbent. John Adams (1796) and Thomas Jefferson (1800) pulled that off when the political system bore almost no resemblance to contemporary American politics. Only in the 20th century, and only sporadically at that, has the vice presidency been regarded as a stepping stone. Three wealthy men of small accomplishment but large ambition sought the position with an eye on the presidency in the first half of the century. Two of them (Franklin Delano Roosevelt, successful 1920 Democratic nominee, and John F. Kennedy, unsuccessful 1956 Democratic contender) calculated the vice presidency would enhance their resumes. The third, Theodore Roosevelt, became president on the death of William McKinley in 1901. Like Mr. Cheney before him, Mr. Biden’s appeal for the vice presidency was based in large measure on the belief he would not seek the White House on his own. But Mr. Cheney, while an important vice president, did not have a history of seeking the presidency while Mr. Biden has been preoccupied with the notion for decades. Though his 1988 campaign ended amid charges he plagiarized part of his stump speech from the British Labor leader Nick Kinnock, it is largely forgotten today that Mr. Biden was regarded as a very strong contender and the one with perhaps the best-developed strategy for winning the White House. That strategy — a Baby Boomer appeal by a man who wasn’t part of that generation but nonetheless recognized the power of 75 million voters born between 1946 and 1964 — would have no resonance today. His attraction in 2016 would be as the tested man of experience, the onetime young-man-in-a-hurry who now possesses the seasoning, patience and perspective to guide the United States to the end of the second decade of the new century. Ms. Clinton already has broken with the administration on the Pacific trade pact and will be under pressure to identify other areas in which she differs. Mr. Biden would face the same pressure but would have less incentive or inclination to identify differences with his patron. But in two respects a Biden candidacy would help Ms. Clinton. He is five years older than she, thus removing the age issue. And he is still a member of the administration, thus removing the notion that Ms. Clinton is the candidate of a third Obama term. *GOP* *DECLARED* *BUSH* *Indignant Jeb Bush Says He Takes Donald Trump’s Remarks Personally <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/04/an-angry-jeb-bush-says-he-takes-donald-trumps-remarks-personally/?module=BlogPost-Title&version=Blog%20Main&contentCollection=Politics&action=Click&pgtype=Blogs®ion=Body> // NYT // Patrick Healy – July 4, 2015* MERRIMACK, N.H. – Jeb Bush, whose wife is Mexican and three children were raised to celebrate their bicultural roots, showed a flash of anger on Saturday as he said that he “absolutely” took personal offense when Donald Trump recently described Mexican immigrants coming to the United States as “rapists” and criminals. Mr. Bush, a former Florida governor, used his strongest language yet to denounce Mr. Trump, a rival for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination and the second-place finisher behind Mr. Bush in a New Hampshire poll that was conducted after Mr. Trump made those remarks. Mr. Bush, after marching in an Independence Day parade here with two of his children, George and Noelle, said that Mr. Trump’s views are “way out of the mainstream” of the party. “To make these extraordinarily ugly kind of comments is not reflective of the Republican Party,” Mr. Bush said about Mr. Trump, whose comments caused NBC, Univision, Macy’s and others to cut ties with him. “He’s doing this — he’s not a stupid guy, so I don’t assume he thinks that every Mexican crossing the border is a rapist. He’s doing this to inflame and incite and to draw attention, which seems to be the organizing principle of his campaign,” Mr. Bush said. Asked if he took Mr. Trump’s remarks personally, given his family, Mr. Bush became a little cross. “Yeah, of course it — absolutely — and a lot of other people” did as well, he said. “But politically, we’re going to win when we’re hopeful and optimistic and big and broad rather than errrrr, grrrr, just angry all the time. This is an exaggerated form of that, and there is no tolerance for it.” Another Republican candidate, Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, gave a different answer on Friday when asked about Mr. Trump, a longtime friend. He criticized Mr. Trump’s remarks but then appeared to vouch for him. “I like Donald. He’s a good guy,” Mr. Christie said. “And as I said right from the beginning, he’ll be as serious a candidate as he wants to be. Those are his choices.” Mr. Trump issued a statement in response to the criticism, saying, “Today, Jeb Bush once again proves that he is out of touch with the American people. Just like the simple question asked of Jeb on Iraq, where it took him five days and multiple answers to get it right, he doesn’t understand anything about the border or border security. In fact, Jeb believes illegal immigrants who break our laws when they cross our border come “out of love.” ” *Bush: ‘Absolutely’ offended by Trump’s comments on Mexicans <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/04/bush-absolutely-offended-by-trumps-comments-on-mexicans/> // WaPo // Ed O’Keefe – July 4, 2015* MERRIMACK, N.H. -- Jeb Bush says he's "absolutely" personally offended by Donald Trump's recent incendiary comments about Mexico and immigrants coming from the country. Bush, the former Florida governor whose wife is from Mexico, made his comments about Trump to reporters at the end of two Independence Day parades in the first-in-the-nation primary state. "I don’t think he represents the Republican Party, and his views are way out of the mainstream of what Republicans think," Bush said. "No one suggests that we shouldn’t control our borders – everybody has a belief that we should control our borders. But to make these extraordinarily ugly kind of comments is not reflective of the Republican Party. Trump is wrong on this." "He’s doing this to inflame and to incite and to get to draw attention which just seems to be the organization principle of his campaign. It doesn’t represent the Republican Party or its values," Bush added. Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush begins marching in an Independence Day parade in Amherst, N.H., on Saturday. (Ed O'Keefe/The Washington Post) During his announcement speech nearly three weeks ago, Trump blamed Mexico for allowing immigrants to illegally cross into the United States. “They’re bringing drugs,” Trump said in his campaign announcement speech. “They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.” In the weeks since, several companies have cut ties to Trump and Democrats have seized on the remarks as further evidence of the GOP's difficulty in appealing to Latinos and other minority groups. Bush was asked whether he's personally offended by the comments, given that his wife, Columba, was born in Mexico. "Yeah, of course. Absolutely. And a lot of other people as well," he said. "But politically -- we’re going to win when we’re hopeful and optimistic and big and broad rather than 'RRRR'" he said -- literally, growling -- "just angry all the time. This is an exaggerated form of that and there is no tolerance for it." Bush made similar, but less expansive comments about Trump while campaigning in Nevada last weekend. His comments on Saturday were sharper and more personal and came just a few hours after former Republican Party presidential nominee Mitt Romney said that Trump's comments were hurting the GOP. "I think he made a severe error in saying what he did about Mexican-Americans," Romney said, according to CNN. Bush and Trump sit atop the most recent polls of New Hampshire Republican primary voters, with several other GOP opponents who once topped the surveys -- including Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker -- sinking in those recent polls. Bush spent more than four hours on Saturday marching with supporters and likely shaking thousands of hands. He has been spending the last few days at the Bush family compound in Kennebunkport, Maine. Given the proximity to New Hampshire, his son, Texas Land Commissioner George P. Bush, and his daughter, Noelle, tagged along for the parades. Bush marched first in tiny Amherst before coming here to Merrimack. Several other presidential candidates, including Democrat Lincoln Chaffee and Republicans Lindsey O. Graham and Rick Perry also marched in the Amherst parade. Chaffee also marched here in Merrimack. *Jeb Bush: Trump comments meant 'to draw attention' <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/04/politics/bush-trump-immigrants/> // CNN // Ashley Killough – July 5, 2015* (CNN)Jeb Bush said Donald Trump doesn't represent the views of most Republicans, offering his most aggressive comments so far on the real estate titan who's used inflammatory language when talking about immigrants. "This is a guy who was a Democrat for most of the last decade. I don't think he represents the Republican Party, and his views are way out of the mainstream of what most Republicans think," Bush told reporters after an Independence Day parade in Merrimack, New Hampshire, according to The New York Times. Calling immigrants from Latin America "rapists," Trump has become a thorn in the side of many Republicans, who are trying to appeal to a wider tent of voters, including Latinos. Bush, whose wife is from Mexico, stated a week ago in Nevada that he simply thought Trump was "wrong," adding that "maybe we will have a chance to have an honest discussion about it on a stage somewhere." But on Saturday, Bush talked at length about his presidential rival after a week of continued pressure on Republicans -- including by other Republicans -- to make more forceful condemnations of Trump. "Trump is wrong on this," Bush said. "He's doing this. He's not a stupid guy. Don't think he thinks every Mexican crossing the border is a rapist. He's doing this to inflame and incite and to draw attention, which seems to be his organizing principle of his campaign." Trump fired back Saturday. "Today, Jeb Bush once again proves that he is out of touch with the American people," he said in a statement. "... He doesn't understand anything about the border or border security. In fact, Jeb believes illegal immigrants who break our laws when they cross our border come "out of love." He said he is "proud to be fighting for a strong and secure border," describing it as a crucial issue. Trump said Friday that the recent killing of a young woman in San Francisco by a suspect who police say is an undocumented immigrant is further proof of his argument. Asked about the slaying, Bush agreed that the border needs to be secure and that anyone who commits a crime "should be deported," chiding what he called "sanctuary cities that encourage this." Sticking to his message about maintaining an optimistic tune, Bush said Republicans will do best "when we're hopeful" rather than "angry all the time." "And this is an exaggerated form of that and there is no tolerance for that," he said, according to The New York Times. Following his presidential announcement last month, Trump saw a sharp boost in his poll numbers and came in second place behind Bush according to the latest CNN/ORC International poll. Bush has been on the receiving end of sharp rhetoric from Trump, who's criticized the former Florida governor for his positions on immigration and Common Core. "He thinks people come over for love. I don't understand why he's in first place," Trump told CNN's Don Lemon earlier this week. "Maybe it's the Bush name. Last thing we need is another Bush. But I will tell you, I'm a little surprised he's in the position he's in." *Jeb Bush’s Giving Totaled 1.5% of Income From 2007 to 2013 <http://www.belljarnews.com/jeb-bush-s-giving-totaled-1-5-of-income-from-2007-to-2013/8517412/> // The Bell Jar – July 5, 2015* In fact as shown above from Bush’s own tax return data in many years his income and taxes were zero. Bush’s income skyrocketed after he finished his time as Florida governor in 2007. While the internet has made much of Bush’s post-political income (approaching $30 million since he stopped being Governor in 2007) and his high effective tax rate in recent years (nearing 42%), I’d like to focus our attention a bit more narrowly: How was Jeb Bush impacted by President Obama’s decision to allow the tax cuts enacted by his brother, George W., to expire effective January 1, 2013? Returns from 2014 aren’t yet filed because Bush is still waiting to receive tax paperwork from his business partnerships, aides said. Mr Bush paid no federal taxes in 1985 and 1986, two years when his investment losses cancelled out his income. Republican Jeb Bush planned to release 33 years of tax records on Tuesday in what was believed to be the most ever made public by a presidential candidate. Clinton’s campaign press secretary, Brian Fallon, said Tuesday that she “fully expects to release her tax returns again this time, as she did the last time she ran for president”. He also gave more than $100,000 to charity that year. He continued to make at least $1.85 million each year, with his highest total, $7.3 million, coming in 2013. Bush’s effective tax rate from 1981 to 2013 was about 36 percent – much higher than Romney’s because most of Bush’s income was regular income rather than capital gains, which are taxed a lower rate. [Bush tax forms show income of million since 2007]. “And I don’t believe that that is appropriate”, Bush said. A bar graph rendering that comparison, showing Bush to the left of Bob Dole, who released 30 years of returns, sat atop the page when it went live. In 2004, Democratic nominee John Kerry disclosed 20 years of such records. The tax returns can be viewed on Bush’s website here. No other candidate or prospective presidential candidate this year has committed to releasing as many tax returns as Bush. “None of Hillary Clinton’s presidential opponents have revealed anything close to this amount of personal financial information”. Clinton’s earning since 2014 put the couple in the top one-tenth of 1 percent of all Americans. “I paid the government more than one in three dollars that I earned in my career”. Some of the information has already been publicly available. He earns between $40,000 and $50,000 per domestic speaking engagement – which he noted during a news conference was less than the $65,000 that fellow presidential offspring Chelsea Clinton brings in. In 2012, the previous year for which Mrs Clinton made financial disclosures, her wealth was estimated at $15m by OpenSecrets.org which tracks candidates and campaign finances. Bush’s Republican rivals did not indicate when their tax returns might be made public. And his income only continued to grow. Mr Bush is himself a very wealthy man, with a net worth of $19-22m [GBP12-14m]. Mr. Bush sat on several for-profit boards after he left the governor’s office, including Cormatrix, Rayonier, Swisher Hygiene, Tenet Healthcare, Empower Software Holdings and Geo Fossil Fuels LLC. *Jeb Bush, Married To Mexican, Denounces Donald Trump, Takes 'Ugly' Remarks About Immigrants Personally <http://www.ibtimes.com/jeb-bush-married-mexican-denounces-donald-trump-takes-ugly-remarks-about-immigrants-1995945> // International Business Times // Elizabeth Whitman – July 4, 2015* Donald Trump's recent comments about Mexicans, which have offended a broad range of Latin American society, from celebrities to television channels, did not sit well with Jeb Bush. In fact, the former Florida governor and one of Trump's many fellow contenders for the 2016 Republican nomination for president took those remarks somewhat personally. "He’s doing this to inflame and incite and to draw attention, which seems to be the organizing principle of his campaign,” Bush told the New York Times while in New Hampshire Saturday. And he "absolutely" felt the remarks on a personal level. Bush's wife, Columba, is Mexican. They have three children together, and Bush speaks fluent Spanish. In June, Trump offered some thoughts on Mexican immigrants in the United States: “They are bringing drugs. They are bringing crime. They’re rapists,” he said in launching his first bid for the presidency. “Some, I assume, are good people,” the business tycoon added. Bush was also careful to deflect Trump's comments away from the party whose presidential nomination they both seek. “To make these extraordinarily ugly kind of comments is not reflective of the Republican Party,” Bush said. "He’s not a stupid guy, so I don’t assume he thinks that every Mexican crossing the border is a rapist," he added. As for the benefits of making such derogatory remarks, Bush suggested there were none. “But politically, we’re going to win when we’re hopeful and optimistic and big and broad rather than errrrr, grrrr, just angry all the time. This is an exaggerated form of that, and there is no tolerance for it.” In response to Trump's remarks, numerous entities have cut ties to the media mogul. Several Latin American countries have dropped out of this year's Miss Universe pageant or refused to broadcast the contest. Macy's, NBC, Serta and Univision have also cut business ties with him, and the City of New York is reviewing its contracts. Mayor Bill de Blasio called the remarks "disgusting and offensive." *Polls Show Jeb Bush In Good Standing To Win The GOP Nomination <http://www.inquisitr.com/2224278/polls-show-jeb-bush-in-good-standing-to-win-the-gop-nomination/#WzMLHCMREfg1Fuiz.99> // Inquisitr – July 5, 2015* Marco Rubio had been gaining on Jeb Bush in the polls last month, but now the momentum has switched and Bush appears to have regained his front-runner status and is surging ahead of Rubio in one national poll, the Tampa Bay Times reports. In the newest CNN/ORC poll released this past week, Jeb Bush leads nationally among Republican candidates for president with 19 percent, a substantial improvement over his 13 percent in June in the same poll. Rubio has fallen from 14 percent to just six percent in the same time period in the same poll. While Bush has gained on Rubio in the CNN/ORC poll, the Miami Herald reports that both candidates are still behind Hillary Clinton in possible general election match-ups measured in that poll. Hillary Clinton leads Bush 54 percent to 41 percent, while having a 59 to 34 percent lead over Donald Trump and a 56 to 39 percent lead over Marco Rubio. Business Insider reports that Bush might well be once again the front-runner for the GOP nomination for president in 2016, according to a statement by CNN‘s polling director, Jennifer Agiesta. “The findings suggest Bush is making progress toward being seen as the frontrunner in a field that has long lacked a clear leader,” wrote Agiesta, “He holds a significant lead over the second-place candidate Trump, is seen as the candidate who could best handle illegal immigration and social issues, and runs about even with Trump and well ahead of the other candidates when Republicans are asked which candidate can best handle the economy.” A look at the latest polling data and averages at Real Clear Politics (RCP) shows that Jeb Bush has a very plausible path to winning the GOP nomination in 2016. Assuming some degree of accuracy of this polling data, here is how the early caucus and primary votes might well go, and how they could lead to a Jeb Bush nomination for president in 2016. Bush is currently tied for second place, with Dr. Ben Carson, in the RCP average in Iowa with 9.3 percent, and Scott Walker leads with 17.5 percent in the average but he is believed to be slipping in the polls in Iowa. A renewed and serious effort by Jeb Bush in Iowa could still find him coming in second to Walker but perhaps a stronger-than-expected second that would lead to pundits saying maybe the Bush campaign is gaining strength. The momentum of finishing better than expected in Iowa should have Jeb Bush going into New Hampshire gaining in the polls there, where Bush now leads with 15.2 percent in the RCP average while Walker and Trump come in second and third place respectively in New Hampshire. Poor finishes in Iowa and New Hampshire are likely to cause several of the under-performing candidates to suspend their candidacies. After the strong performance in New Hampshire, Jeb Bush goes to South Carolina gaining in the polls, where he now leads 13.7 percent to 13.3 percent over Scott Walker in the RCP average. This will be very much like 2000 in South Carolina, where John McCain needed to beat George W. Bush in the state to stay in the race, and winning the state gave Bush a clear advantage over McCain. Same in South Carolina in 2016, except the candidates are Jeb Bush and Scott Walker. Same result, the candidate with the last name of Bush wins. Florida will vote next, where Jeb Bush even now leads with 24.3 percent to Rubio at 18.7 and Walker at 11.7 in the RCP average of polls. Bush should win that more easily, after winning New Hampshire and South Carolina, and beyond that should easily win most of the remaining primary and caucus votes on his way to winning the GOP nomination in 2016. This will be very much like winning GOP campaigns of the past, including Mitt Romney in 2012, John McCain in 2008, George W. Bush in 2000, George H.W. Bush in 1988, and Ronald Reagan in 1980. The current polling data shows Jeb Bush could very well follow the patterns of many of those winning candidates who become GOP nominees and win the GOP nomination for 2016. For that not to happen, one of the other candidates will have to become the clear choice of those who do not want Jeb Bush as the nominee, and win some early states to become the sole challenger to Bush early in the process. Either Marco Rubio or Scott Walker would have to defeat Bush in New Hampshire and South Carolina for that scenario to be possible, and for one of them to defeat Jeb Bush in 2016. The polling data today suggests that is not likely, but there is plenty of time for all of this to change. *RUBIO* *Trump fires back at Rubio after ICE says suspected killer was deported 5 times <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/4/trump-fires-back-at-rubio-after-ice-says-kathryn-s/> // Washington Times // Kellan Howell – July 4, 2015* Donald Trump wants to know what Florida Senator Marco Rubio has to say about a San Francisco woman who may have been killed by a convicted felon with five previous deportations. The New York businessman has come under fire for unfiltered comments on the kinds of criminality that accompanies illegal immigration. “Our next president needs to be someone who brings Americans together — not someone who continues to divide,” Mr. Rubio wrote on Thursday. “Our broken immigration system is something that needs to be solved, and comments like this move us further from — not closer to — a solution.” Mr. Trump took to Twitter on Thursday to highlight the case of Kathryn Steinle, 32, who was killed while she walked along the city’s Pier 14 with her father earlier in the week. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials said the man who was arrested in connection with her seemingly random killing had been deported five times. “.@marcorubio what do you say to the family of Kathryn Steinle in CA who was viciously killed b/c we can’t secure our border? Stand up for US,” Mr. Trump Tweeted. Suspect Francisco Sanchez, 45, was arrested shortly after Ms. Steinle’s killing. Mr. Trump also used the story to fire back at his other critics as well. His rhetoric on illegal immigration has cost him several partnerships with major businesses like Macy’s, NBC, and Univision, and earned him harsh criticism from actress America Ferrera. “Thank you America Ferrara [sic] for supporting lawless criminals from Mexico. One more needless death. 2 innocent lives taken,” Mr. Trump tweeted. “Our Southern border it totally out of control. This is an absolutely disgraceful. situation. We need border security!” *Trump hammers Rubio: ‘Zero credibility,’ ‘outright lies’ to sell amnesty <http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/04/trump-hammers-rubio-zero-credibility-outright-lies-to-sell-amnesty/> // Breitbart News // Matthew Boyle – July 4, 2015* Rubio joined Democrats and liberals—as well as most of the mainstream media—in attacking Trump for calling out international criminals who exploit America’s weak and insecure border to get into the United States illegally. “Trump’s comments are not just offensive and inaccurate, but also divisive,” Rubio said. “Our next president needs to be someone who brings Americans together – not someone who continues to divide. Our broken immigration system is something that needs to be solved, and comments like this move us further from – not closer to – a solution. We need leaders who offer serious solutions to secure our border and fix our broken immigration system.” Rubio’s statement follows what Trump said about illegal aliens two weeks ago in his presidential campaign announcement speech. “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best,” Trump said then. “They’re sending people that have lots of problems… they’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” Rubio joins people like Barack Obama’s 2012 presidential campaign co-chair and liberal actress Eva Longoria—who compared Trump to Adolf Hitler—and Univision programming president Alberto Ciurana–who compared Trump to Charleston, South Carolina, mass murderer Dylann Storm Roof. There are plenty of others throughout the mainstream media and institutional left who have slammed Trump as well, and some Republicans like former Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former New York Gov. George Pataki. Sending out a link to a Breitbart California article detailing how one such illegal alien like the criminals Trump called out in his announcement speech allegedly murdered a woman in San Francisco on Wednesday, Trump launched his initial response at Rubio via Twitter: “Our Southern border is unsecure. I am the only one that can fix it, nobody else has the guts to even talk about it.” “Our Southern border is totally out of control. This is an absolutely disgraceful. situation,” Trump added. “We need border security!” “Where are the other candidates now that this tragic murder has taken place b/c of our unsafe border,” he added in another tweet. “We need a wall!” In a fourth tweet, Trump sent a message directly to Rubio: “.@marcorubio what do you say to the family of Kathryn Steinle in CA who was viciously killed b/c we can’t secure our border? Stand up for US.” In addition, a Trump adviser sent a lengthy statement to Breitbart News on Friday evening signaling that the real estate mogul isn’t backing down. “Mr. Trump will never apologize for wanting the American people to have a secure border,” the Trump adviser said. “He is the sole candidate who will secure our broken southern border by building a massive wall. The American people deserve a wall to protect their safety, jobs and economy.” In addition, Trump’s adviser told Breitbart News that his boss can’t wait to expose Rubio’s weakness on immigration: Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) has zero credibility on securing our border. Nothing has been more “divisive” than the outright lies used to try and sell his amnesty for illegal immigrants to the American people. Hard working Americans cannot depend on Senator Rubio to protect their jobs. Senator Rubio’s “Gang of Eight” bill, which was such an epic failure it never even came up for a vote in the House, would have given President Obama the immediate power to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants. Trump’s team seems ready to hone in on Rubio’s biggest weakness: That he worked with senior Democrats like Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Dick Durbin (D-IL), and the now-indicted Bob Menendez (D-NJ) to put forward an amnesty bill last Congress. Rubio eventually backed away from his own bill after he tanked in the polls. “Rubio flip flopped on the bill for political expediency with the explanation that he could not expect President Obama to enforce it. Why would Rubio have given Obama this authority in the first place?” Trump’s adviser said. Just this past weekend in New Hampshire, Rubio used several of the same talking points he used to sell the Gang of Eight bill to push a pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens. When asked if he supports a pathway to citizenship for those who broke America’s immigration laws, Rubio said: “I do.” But first we have to prove to the American people that illegal immigration is under control and today that lack of confidence has made it impossible for us to make progress on immigration reform. So the first thing we have to do is we have to pass real reforms that secure the border more secure than it is today, an entry-exit tracking system to prevent visa overstays, and we also need to create an Electronic Verification system for employers so they can verify that the people they’re hiring are legally here. We need to put that in place and show it to the American people and prove that illegal immigration for the future is under control. After we do that the second step is we must modernize our legal immigration system. Today, legal immigration is primarily on the basis of whether or not you have a relative living here. In the 21st century it must be based on what skills you have or what you can contribute economically. After we’ve done those two steps, I believe the American people will be very generous and responsible about what you do with those who have been here a long time. I think the best approach is to have them come forward, undergo a background check, pay a fine for having violated our law, start paying taxes—and in return for all of that—they will get a work permit that will allow them to work and travel legally in the United States. That’s the only status they would be allowed to have for at least a decade. Then assuming if after a decade they’ve complied with all of that then they would be allowed to apply for permanent residency just like anybody else would—not through a special path—and then of course once you have permanent residency depending on how you acquire it, within three to five years, you could apply for citizenship. That is a long path. But I do think it’s fair and reasonable. But we can’t even get to that third step I’ve outlined until we’ve done the other two things first. That’s just the reality of the political situation we have today in America. Rubio made most of the same claims in nearly identical language during his advocacy for the Gang of Eight bill. Trump has also been extraordinarily critical of the Obamatrade deal that Rubio voted for. “Rubio’s dangerous amnesty bill and his recent vote for Trade Promotion Authority – after never reading the Trans-Pacific Partnership – show an unsettling truth,” Trump’s adviser told Breitbart News. Trump’s team compared Rubio at that point to Obama himself—both of them, after all, were first-term U.S. Senators when they launched their White House bids. “Rubio is a typical politician who is controlled by the special interests,” Trump’s adviser said. “The one-term Senator simply does not have the experience or judgment to be President.” Trump’s adviser wrapped his statement to Breitbart News by noting that Trump will actually secure the border, unlike Rubio. “Mr. Trump believes that a nation without borders is not a nation at all,” Trump’s adviser said. “Mr. Trump will never apologize for fighting for border security. It is common sense and will Make America Great Again!” Trump is likely to turn the jets on Rubio, as Rubio continues sinking in the polls again—much like he did after he drove amnesty through the Senate last Congress. In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News in Trump Tower in New York City after his presidential campaign announcement, Trump said of Rubio: “I would say Marco Rubio is just not the guy.” “Rubio is weak on immigration and he’s weak on jobs,” Trump said in a previous interview with Breitbart News. “We need someone who is going to make the country great again, and Rubio is not going to make the country great again—and neither is [former Florida Gov. Jeb] Bush.” *PAUL* *Don’t dismiss Rand Paul’s tax plan <http://www.dallasnews.com/business/columnists/scott-burns/20150704-burns-dont-dismiss-rand-pauls-tax-plan.ece> // Dallas News // Scott Burns – July 4, 2015* Most news media dismissed Rand Paul’s tax plan, like his candidacy for president, as a nonstarter. But many of those reports failed to grasp a gigantic part of the plan. They also wrongly concluded that the flat tax was a big break for high-income people but not so good for middle-income people. Let’s take a closer look at the plan the Republican senator from Kentucky proposes. It would abolish the employment tax. The plan would end the most regressive tax in the lifetime of every living American. This is a big, big deal. All workers pay this tax on the first dollar of wages. But the tax stops at $118,500. Wages over that amount pay taxes for Medicare but not for Social Security. This tax has been rising since 1937. In 1937, the tax was 2 percent of the first $2,000. Today, including the Medicare tax, the rate is 15.3 percent on the first $118,500 in earnings. It’s a big tax. How big? Most Americans pay more employment taxes than income taxes. A recent report shows that the income tax burden was lower than the employment tax for most households with incomes under $200,000. Internal Revenue Service data tells us that 96 percent of households have incomes under that amount. So take a look at your next pay stub. Think about what you could do with the largest “raise” most people have gotten in years. Then think about the trivial tinkering that most of the other candidates are offering. The money to support Social Security and Medicare would come from a new 14.5 percent tax on corporate payrolls. Note that the tax is on the entire payroll, not just wages up to $118,500. So the tax could sustain our nation’s most important social programs. And it wouldn’t be regressive. The other benefit is that a later increase in the tax could bolster Social Security. The next generation wouldn’t be short-changed on benefits. Most proposals to improve Social Security focus on shrinking the benefits of future retirees while collecting the same regressive taxes. Young workers would be most affected. For years, public and media reaction to the idea of a flat tax has been that it would be tough on poor people but great for rich people. The reality is different. The Rand Paul proposal calls for a flat tax rate of 14.5 percent on all taxable income. But first, some hefty deductions and exemptions come off the top. How hefty? Under current tax law, a family of four that didn’t itemize would have deductions of $28,600. That’s four personal exemptions of $4,000 and a standard deduction of $12,600. Under Paul’s tax plan, the same family would have $50,000 in exemptions and deductions. That means no taxes on an extra $21,400. A family with $50,000 in income would pay no income taxes under Paul’s plan. The same family would pay $2,287.50 under current law. That’s a 100 percent tax cut. Double income to $100,000, and the family would pay $7,250 under the Paul plan and $9,787.50 under current law. That’s a 26 percent tax cut. Double income again to $200,000, and the family would pay $21,750 under the Paul plan and $35,043.50 under current law. That’s a 38 percent tax cut. What about the big dogs? Yes, they’d get a big tax cut, too. The top 1 percent pays income taxes at an average tax rate of 22.8 percent according to IRS figures. So the drop to 14.5 percent would be about a 36 percent cut. The Paul plan cuts the corporate tax rate to 14.5 percent. Right now the top rate is 35 percent. Armies of corporate finaglers, lobbyists and tax code whisperers work to avoid that rate. They do their best to cut the burden. So reduce the rate. Then watch Apple and dozens of other companies repatriate billions in overseas earnings. Watch companies that have become corporate expatriates renew their love for Delaware. Watch companies decide to build factories and hire workers in America, not Asia or Mexico. This is a new deal for America. If Republicans can’t find the nerve to back it, pray that a smart Democrat does. *CRUZ* *Ted Cruz: ‘Asinine’ to pull reruns of ‘The Dukes of Hazzard’ <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/04/ted-cruz-asinine-to-pull-reruns-of-the-dukes-of-hazzard/> // WaPo // Katie Zezima – July 4, 2015* GREENVILLE, S.C. - Sen. Ted Cruz said Saturday that it is "asinine" that TV Land pulled "The Dukes of Hazzard" after widespread calls for the Confederate flag to come down. "I think the cancellation of 'The Dukes of Hazzard' is utterly asinine and an example of corporate America’s embrace of political correctness to a degree that is ridiculous," Cruz said in an interview with The Washington Post. "I’m curious if the Torquemadas seeking to ban 'The Dukes of Hazzard' from our TV sets are equally exercised by all of the leftist college students with posters of Che Guevara in their college dorm rooms," Cruz said, referring to Tomas de Torquemada, who served as the first grand inquisitor of Spain. Cruz visited South Carolina for the first time since Gov. Nikki Haley (R) called for the removal of the Confederate flag from near the state capitol in the wake of of the shooting deaths of nine people at a historic African American church in Charleston. Photos have surfaced of the alleged shooter, Dylann Roof, posing with the Confederate flag. Since then, a backlash has grown against the flag, with Alabama removing it from its state capitol and retailers pulling merchandise that displays the banner. Two of Cruz's campaign co-chairs, South Carolina state Sen. Lee Bright and state Rep. Bill Chumley, have said that they will fight to keep the flag at a state house memorial. The Texas Republican said that he has not spoken to Bright and Chumley; Cruz's campaign said last month they are going to "stand by" Bright and Chumley. Bright likened the removal of the flag to a "Stalinist purge." "It’s not just the flag,” Bright said in an interview with Politico last month. “They want to take down the Confederate monuments; I’ve gotten e-mails from people who want to rename streets. … Anytime you want to basically remove the symbols of history from a state, that’s something that just is very bad." Chumley said on CNN last month that the people killed in the church "waited their turn to be shot." "We need to be focusing on the nine families that are left and see that this doesn't happen again," he said. "These people sat in there and waited their turn to be shot. That's sad that somebody in there with the means of self-defense could have stopped this." Cruz said, as he did in an interview with The Washington Post last month, that the issue of the Confederate flag is one for South Carolina to decide. "I understand this is an issue and debate that evokes strong emotions. I understand those who see in the flag remembrances of our nation’s shameful legacy of slavery and bigotry and hatred and oppression. I also understand those who see in the flag a recognition of their ancestor’s sacrifices and our history and traditions separate and apart from the horrors of slavery," Cruz said Saturday. "The issue should be decided by South Carolinians, not by those from other states parachuting in to lecture the citizens on how to resolve this question of state law," Cruz said. "That’s the way our federalist system is supposed to work." Cruz said the decision of Wal-Mart and other retailers to stop selling Confederate flag merchandise is theirs to make. "I think that is a decision for each company and each individual in our free market to make. I believe in free speech. Free speech means that each of us can choose what to say and what not to say," he said. Cruz said Guevara was "a sick, murderous, torturing, tyrant. And yet in the bizarro world that is modern political correctness, because he’s a leftist, Che Guevara, like Chairman Mao on their kitschy little watches, is to be celebrated and glorified with no recognition of the thousands or even millions of souls tortured and murdered at their hands." *GOP presidential candidate Cruz wasn’t always ‘Ted’ <http://www.star-telegram.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/politex-blog/article26505046.html> // Star-Telegram // Maria Recio & Anna M. Tinsley – July 4, 2015* Until U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, was 13, he had an altogether different first name than he does now. He was named Rafael Edward after his father when he was born in 1970 and to distinguish him from the elder Cruz, he went by the diminutive “Rafaelito,” which was shortened to “Felito.” “Until I was thirteen, I was ‘Felito Cruz,’” writes the GOP presidential candidate in his just-released autobiography, A Time for Truth: Reigniting the Promise of America. “The problem with that name was that it seemed to rhyme with every major corn chip on the market. Fritos, Cheetos, Doritos, and Tostitos — a fact that other young children were quite happy to point out.” What to do? His mother Eleanor gave him the solution: change your name. “There are a number of other possibilities,” Cruz quotes her as saying “Rafael. Raph. Ralph. Edward. Ed. Eddie. Or you could go by Ted,” she said. Cruz said that he immediately warmed to “Ted.” “But my father was furious with the decision. He viewed it as a rejection of him and his heritage, which was not my intention,” recalled Cruz. “‘What do you mean Ted is a nickname for Edward?” he snapped at my mother. ‘Who’s ever heard of that?’” “My mother’s response was unfortunate. ‘Well, there’s Ted Kennedy,’” she said.” The late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., the liberal “Lion of the Senate” was indeed known as “Ted.” Rafael Cruz, Sr. refused to utter his son’s new name for two years. No more ‘two-step’ in Texas Fort Worth attorney Jason Smith is among those happy to see that the Texas Democratic Party is scrapping the “Texas Two-Step,” a two-tiered system that awards delegates through both a popular vote on election night and also through post-election caucuses. Smith filed a challenge to the way delegates were designated in 2008, after Democrat Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in Texas’ primary but Democrat Barack Obama received more delegates through the caucus process. Recently, both the Texas Democratic Party and the Republican Party of Texas made official plans to designate national convention delegates based on the outcomes of their primaries. “The DNC’s decision vindicates the principle of one person, one vote for Texas Democrats,” Smith said. Symbol of the struggle U.S. Rep. Kay Granger, R-Fort Worth, a long-time advocate for education for girls in the developing world, met June 23 with Malala Yousafzai, the 17-year old Nobel Peace Prize laureate. The Pakistani girl, who is promoting education on a U.S. tour, became a symbol of the struggle for young women to get an education in 2012 when she was shot in the head for defying Taliban orders that girls not go to school. After recovering in Britain, Malala, as she is internationally known, became a vocal advocate for girls’ education and in 2014 was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. “Malala Yousafzai’s accomplishments are a source of inspiration for me and many others,” Granger said in a statement. “As the daughter of a teacher and principal, and a former educator myself, I know firsthand the profound impact that an education can have on a young adult.” “The work that Malala does improves the lives of young men and women throughout the world,” she said. Granger, chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee subcommittee on State and Foreign Operations and Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., the ranking member of the appropriations committee and Granger’s panel, met with Malala in the Capitol. *Cruz defends Trump: ‘Washington cartel’ doesn’t want illegal immigration debate <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/4/ted-cruz-defends-donald-trump-washington-cartel-do/> // Washington Times // Kellan Howell – July 4, 2015* Texas Sen. Ted Cruz defended Donald Trump in an interview on Friday, praising the businessman for boldness in addressing illegal immigration despite protests by the “Washington cartel.” “I like Donald Trump. He’s bold, he’s brash, and I get that it seems the favorite sport of the Washington media is to encourage some Republicans to attack other Republicans,” Mr. Cruz told NBC’s Chuck Todd in an interview on Meet The Press. “I ain’t going to do it. I’m not interested in Republican on Republican violence,” he said, Mediaite reported. Mr. Trump has been the subject of harsh criticism, including from GOP candidates Marco Rubio and George Pataki, for comments he made in his campaign launch speech calling Mexican illegal immigrants rapists and criminals. When Mr. Todd asked Mr. Cruz if “rhetoric matters,” Mr. Cruz responded, “I salute Donald Trump for focusing on the need to address illegal immigration. The Washington cartel doesn’t want to address that,” Mediaite reported. Mr. Cruz admitted that Mr. Trump has a “colorful” way of speaking and said that was not the way he would speak, but added that he would not engage in the media’s “game of throwing rocks and attacking other Republicans.” *Ted Cruz Calls For US To Quit UN Human Rights Council After Vote Condemning Israel <http://www.ibtimes.com/ted-cruz-calls-us-quit-un-human-rights-council-after-vote-condemning-israel-1995746> // International Business Times // Mark Hanrahan – July 4, 2015* Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz called Friday for the U.S. to withdraw from the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), after the body voted to condemn Israel's conduct during the 2014 war in Gaza. The U.S. was the only country to vote against the resolution put before the council Friday, with 41 voting in favor, and five countries abstaining. The resolution condemned Israel's targeting of innocent civilians during the conflict, and also called for an end to the impunity of Israeli officials responsible for alleged war crimes. In a statement posted on his website, Cruz said that the single U.S. vote against the censure was a “meaningless gesture.” “It is time to stop ceding moral authority to the UNHRC and tell the truth about this hopelessly biased and anti-Semitic institution. … The United States should stop legitimizing the UNHRC with our membership and withdraw now,” he added. Other critics of the resolution argued that it ignored criticism of the Palestinian side raised in an earlier U.N. Report, which accused both sides in the conflict of committing war crimes. “We are troubled that this current resolution focuses exclusively on alleged Israeli violations, without any expressed reference to Palestinian violations,” U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. in Geneva Keith Harper said as he explained why his country voted against the resolution, the Jerusalem Post reported. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also condemned the UNHRC in a statement, saying that the body was neither interested "in facts nor in true human rights," Haaretz reported. The United Nations has long been a target of Republican ire. President George W. Bush's former ambassador to the U.N., John Bolton, famously once remarked that if the U.N. building “lost ten stories it wouldn’t make a bit of difference.” *Ted Cruz Is Right to Call for Retention Elections for the Supreme Court <http://www.nationalreview.com/article/420745/ted-cruz-supreme-court-george-will> // National Review //Andrrew C. McCarthy – July 4, 2015* Within the space of just 48 hours, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the president is above the law; that straightforward statutory words may be twisted to mean the opposite of what they say; that discrimination — heretofore, the textbook example of a willful act — can be committed unconsciously, thereby supplanting our constitutional foundation of equal opportunity for all with the totalitarian’s dream of guaranteed outcomes for favored factions; and that five politically unaccountable lawyers, by dint of being issued robes, may impose their vision of the good society on 320 million Americans, reimagining our most basic institutions, our founding law, centuries of jurisprudence, and millennia of civilization. Like millions of Americans, Senator Ted Cruz (R., Texas) thought this was a disastrous couple of days for the country. So did the rest of the Trumped-up cavalcade of GOP presidential hopefuls — or, at least, they said they did. Cruz, however, undertook to do something about it. He proposed an amendment to the Constitution that would subject the justices to retention elections. “No social transformation without representation” adjured Justice Antonin Scalia in dissent from the five-justice diktat that 50 states end their democratic debate and redefine marriage to include same-sex couples. At least for now it is “couples.” No coherent limiting principle stops Justice Anthony Kennedy’s rendition of “All You Need Is Love” from devolving into “Why Don’t We Do It in the Road?” — and yes, for the modern Supreme Court, Lennon and McCartney are more apt than Blackstone and Story to shed light on the countless ways we might “enjoy liberty as we learn its meaning.” Cruz’s amendment simply takes up Scalia’s suggestion. Our would-be overlords would be required to account to us if they wanted to continue ruling us. Here at National Review last week, the senator outlined his proposal: The justices would face the voters every eight years, earning retention only if they are approved by a popular national majority plus majorities in at least half of the states. For this, Cruz has drawn the ire of the estimable George Will. The columnist lambastes the senator for trying to “turn the court into a third political branch” over “what he considers” the justices’ “political behavior.” Well, Homer nods. My abiding respect for him notwithstanding, Will has this one exactly backwards. What Cruz considers to be political behavior? Considers? Alright, let’s “consider” the same-sex marriage ruling. In an opinion dutifully joined by the Court’s four “progressive” justices (Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan), Justice Kennedy ruled that the states were powerless to define marriage for themselves because our Constitution makes its definition a federal question — the answer to which Kennedy purported to find in a remote Fourteenth Amendment penumbra that had gone unexplored lo these 147 years. But hold on: Just two terms ago, the jurisprudential blink of an eye, the same Anthony Kennedy writing for the same four progressives, ruled that the federal government was powerless to define marriage because our Constitution makes its definition a state question — the answer to which was for the people of each state to work out for themselves. This breathtaking shift can be explained only by politics. It is not law. Law is obliged to be rigorously logical and consistent. It is in politics — the realm of opportunism, compromise, and the swerves of popular passion — that logic and consistency are merely an option, and often not even an aspiration. The issue in 2013 was the Defense of Marriage Act, which progressives despised because it cut against the campaign to promote same-sex marriage in the states. The issue last week was the decision of several states to reaffirm marriage as traditionally understood, which progressives despised because it cut against the campaign to mandate same-sex marriage in the states. The legal rationales for the two decisions cannot be squared, but the legal rationales were beside the point. The Court was doing politics, through and through. As I pointed out last weekend, the Court’s four progressives are not jurists applying legal principles to resolve cases. They are a voting bloc of super-legislators, implementing an ideological agenda. In tandem with Kennedy and Chief Justice John Roberts, who walk on the wild side when personal or political calculation so dispose them, The Four prescribe policy that hundreds of millions of people — people who have no cases before the Court — are expected to accept without recourse. In this, The Four are indistinguishable from, say, the Congressional Black Caucus . . . except that the Caucus must account to its constituents and cannot, under the guise of “constitutional interpretation,” proclaim its pieties as the last, unreviewable word on whatever subject. Cruz is not “turning the court into a third political branch.” Will has mistaken the coroner for the surgeon. The Court already is a third political branch. Cruz is trying to rein it in the only way a political branch gets reined in: by requiring political accountability. Will frets about what would become of the high court’s “prestige” if its incumbents were subjected to elections. But the point is not the justices’ amour-propre. The Court’s prestige does not owe to the jurists’ insulation from electoral politics; it owes to their function in our system: the dispassionate reading of legal texts and application of developed legal principle. That function, not concern over spectacle, is why justices are not subjected to the ballot box. And it is that function that the Supreme Court no longer performs. How, Will wonders, would a politically accountable Court “stand athwart rampant executives and overbearing congressional majorities”? When Will wrote those words, the ink was not yet dry on the Court’s Obamacare ruling, which upheld a rampant executive rewrite of a law rammed through Congress by an overbearing majority. Yet it is somehow not parody. Will is surely right to be concerned about the specter of national judicial elections. I suspect they would be less harrowing than he supposes. Cruz is not talking about having justices run against each other for office. At issue would be whether a justice’s record warrants retention on the bench; if he or she were voted out of office, that would create a vacancy that would have to be filled in the familiar manner outlined in the Constitution. This would not be an election between candidates, each making commitments to this and that interest group in hopes of edging out the rival. It would be a referendum on the American people’s conception of the judicial role and the justice’s fidelity to it. Of course it would be better if we did not have to do something like this. It would be better if Congress and presidents had used their constitutional appointment and impeachment powers to make clear that judges were expected merely to judge (a hard enough job). It would be better if Congress had used its constitutional control over the judiciary’s jurisdiction to minimize the opportunities for judicial imperialism. But they have not. Thus, as reformer types like to say, the system is broken. Cruz did not break it; the justices did, with lots of help. Cruz is trying to fix it: proposing a political check to pressure a politicized institution into reverting to the Court Will is nostalgic for — the nonpolitical branch that fortifies limited government. Conservatives, it should be stressed, are not asking for a Supreme Court that imposes our vision of marriage and market-based health care, or that excuses discrimination when it actually occurs. We are asking for a Supreme Court that upholds the constitutional framework of divided government; that assigns law- and policy-making to the people’s representatives at the state or federal level, depending on the subject matter; and that upholds the liberty guarantees that are actually in the Constitution, rather than degrading them in an arrogant exploration of “existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.” We are asking to go back to ruling ourselves. *CHRISTIE* *Christie slams Obama on Iran, hedges on breaking nuclear deal <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/christie-slams-obama-on-iran-hedges-on-breaking-nuclear-deal-119733.html> // Politico // Ben Schreckinger – July 4, 2015* WOLFEBORO, N.H. — Chris Christie thinks President Barack Obama’s handling of the Iran nuclear talks has been the “single most disturbing” chapter of his presidency, but the New Jersey governor isn’t sure he’d undo a deal if elected president. Though Christie said Saturday morning that Obama should walk away from the nuclear talks, he indicated only that as president, he would investigate whether or not it made sense to stick to a deal the Obama administration and its allies are expected to conclude with Iran to prevent the country from obtaining nuclear weapons. “I’m not one of those guys who’s going to say to you, ‘On day one I will abrogate the agreement,’” said Christie. It was a reference to rivals — including Gov. Scott Walker, Sen. Marco Rubio, Rick Perry, Sen. Lindsey Graham, Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. Bobby Jindal — who have said that as president they would break off any deal not approved by Congress. Christie cited the complexity of the region and the difficulty of predicting the state of the Middle East in January 2017, when the next president will assume office. “On day one, I will look into and try to decide what to do with the agreement, depending on where we are at that moment,” said Christie in response to a question at a breakfast gathering of local Republicans. “Because by the way it’s not just us involved anymore. We have a number of our allies around the world who’re at that table as well, and sanctions are most effective when not only we do it, but the other allies do it.” The UK, Germany, France, China and Russia are also party to the negotiations. Christie harshly criticized Obama’s negotiating performance, saying he had lost leverage by appearing too eager to reach a deal. “The best way to get a result as you know in any negotiation, whether you’re negotiating an arms deal with Iran or whether you’re buying a car, is to not look so desperate,” he said. “Don’t look like you want the car. Don’t look like you’re already driving the car, because the car salesman will go, ‘Oh wow, I’m getting sticker today.” Christie said that if he were conducting negotiations, he would have walked away from the table and advised allies to reimpose tougher sanctions until Iran offered more favorable terms. On Thursday, China’s foreign minister said there was a “high possibility” that Iran would reach a final deal with world powers within a matter of days. After the breakfast, Christie marched in Wolfeboro’s Independence Day parade, along with Rubio and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. <http://time.com/3945854/chris-christie-iran-deal/> *Christie Won’t Pledge to Undo Iran Deal <http://time.com/3945854/chris-christie-iran-deal/> // TIME // Zeke J Miller – July 4, 2015 * New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said Saturday that while he is deeply troubled by the emerging Iranian nuclear agreement, he would not pledge to undo it should he take office. Speaking to Republicans on July 4th in this lakeside vacation town, Christie sought to differentiate himself from the other 15 GOP candidates for president, casting himself as a leader who would carefully consider all options. “I’m not one of those guys who’s going to say to you, ‘on Day One I will abrogate the agreement,'” Christie said, noting that the American president could not just act alone when China, Russia, Germany, France and the United Kingdom are also parties to the deal, should one emerge. “On Day One, I will look into it and try to decide, depending upon where we are at that moment.” As Christie was speaking, American and international negotiators were continuing talks in Vienna to complete the deal before this week’s deadline. Christie said he would have long since walked away from the table, arguing that Iran cannot be trusted to implement the agreement. “If I was negotiating this deal right now, I would be gone,” he said. “I would be away from the table. I would be going back to our allies and saying these are not reliable negotiators on the other side—not the people we can count on to keep their word. They haven’t shown us that.” But Christie added he could not commit to revoke an agreement without prior investigation. “If I’m saddled with the deal as president, then on the first day I’ll be saying to my national security advisor, to my Secretary of State and to my head of national intelligence: give me all the information I need to let me know all the options I have to try to put this genie back in the bottle, and then we’ll make a decision,” he added. The comments follow a pattern for Christie, who has tried to draw subtle differences between himself and the rest of the GOP field on a range of policy proposals. Christie told a crowd of more than 100 at the breakfast event to “be careful” of candidates who make promises about what they’ll do on “Day One.” “I have grave, grave doubts that this is an agreement I will be willing to stand behind, but I also don’t want to be the kind of president who tells all of you something in a campaign and that either doesn’t do it, hoping you forget that I told you I would actually do it on the first day,” he said. “Or, who does it only because I promised it, even if at that moment it’s not what’s in the best interests of America.” *Christie makes nice on the trail in New Hampshire <http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/07/04/christie-makes-nice-trail-new-hampshire/29720513/> // USA Today // Bob Jordan – July 4, 2015* ASBURY PARK, N.J. — New Hampshire primary voters saw plenty of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie in the first week of his presidential campaign. There he was making nice at the Pink Cadillac Diner. You could catch him at the American Legion hall. If not there, then perhaps at a pub or fielding questions at one of his trademark town halls. Wherever Christie went, he was folksy, humorous, engaging, many miles removed from his most caustic, "Sit down and shup up" YouTube moments. But it remains to be seen, in a week where Donald Trump stole most of the headlines and shined in the polls, whether Christie's focus on the Granite State can improve his longshot chances for the 2016 Republican nomination. Christie, trying to reverse a litany of polls showing voters view him unfavorably, was warmly received at each campaign stop he made during a five-day swing through New Hampshire through Saturday, but attendees generally said they were still making up their minds, in a Republican field expected to swell to some 16 candidates. Christie officially became a candidate Tuesday. "He comes across as a real guy but I'm still on the fence,'' said Tom Hamlin, a retired carpenter, after meeting Christie at a packed town hall in rural Ashland. Dean Blake, a cook, also had praise for Christie, but added, "I'm undecided. We're so early with our primary and really relish our important role in the nominating process. A lot of us wait for all the candidates to meet the grassroots people, shake hands with us, and look us in the eye.'' Because voters in New Hampshire tend to be fiscally conservative but more socially moderate than those in Iowa or South Carolina, two other key early-decision states, it has the profile of a state Christie could do well in, political experts say. Matthew Hale, a Seton Hall University political scientist, said it takes effort to win over New Hampshire's voters. "Campaigning in New Hampshire is unlike any place else in the country. It only works in person,'' Hale said. "Governor Christie knows that and is quite good at face-to-face politics.'' Christie's campaign skills should serve him well, said David Redlawsk, a Rutgers University professor and the director of the Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling. "He has a shot of being in the top tier in New Hampshire but right now it's unclear if he can get there just on his campaign style alone,'' Redlawsk said. "I think he will need to benefit from stumbles by other candidates and need Republicans to overlook his baggage on the theory that he would be a strong general election contender.'' Christie has held 11 town halls this year in New Hampshire, including eight before his announcement. That's the most of any candidate. "I assure you no one will catch up,'' Christie said. "We're just going to keep doing them.'' Nonetheless, Christie has his work cut out for him. There is no clear front-runner among New Hampshire Republicans, according to a recent CNN poll, but six candidates polled higher than Christie. And with so many candidates in the field, it will become that much more difficult to get noticed. At week's end, even Christie found himself fielding questions about fellow candidate Trump, who caused an international stir with his harsh comments about Mexican immigrants, followed by blow back from business partners cutting their Trump ties. The "bad" publicity notwithstanding, Trump was second only to former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush in some national, Iowa and New Hampshire polls. Christie, newly wonkish on policy matters ranging from education to entitlements, still languishes in the back of the pack. During his week in New Hampshire, Christie also showed a willingness to pivot on positions in order to gain broader acceptance. At one of the town halls, Christie tried to downplay concerns his foreign policy positions are too hawkish. Christie in May had laid out a get-tough vision that included a call for more troops, more Navy ships, and more combat aircraft. He also urged active American engagement in global conflicts, declaring at the time that "we have never ignored the crises in the world around us." But he added this modification when chatting with a morning audience at the Pink Cadillac Diner on Thursday: "Let me be really clear: I'm not a president who'd be looking to go to war at all." That was good enough for retiree Cathy Spreeman, a Rochester resident. "I've always liked Chris Christie,'' she said. "I like him because when somebody is being stupid, he'll tell them they're being stupid.'' *Chris Christie: King of the 2016 long shots <http://www.burlingtoncountytimes.com/opinion/op-ed/chris-christie-king-of-the-long-shots/article_f8925e16-9532-50f4-afc6-b3c0771c589b.html> // Burlington County Times // Jonathan Bernstein – July 4, 2015* Of the nine Republican presidential candidates I consider viable, I have Gov. Chris Christie, who made his bid official Tuesday, as dead last. From the start, Christie was probably too moderate to have much of a chance at the nomination, and it wasn’t clear if Republicans nationwide would ever warm to his New Jersey style. While conservatives might have forgiven him for some of his positions (as they did Mitt Romney), they wouldn’t forget his embrace of President Barack Obama after Superstorm Sandy, just before the 2012 election. Then the trouble his staff created in blocking traffic on the George Washington Bridge destroyed his November electability argument by attaching a scandal to his candidacy. Still, Christie remains a candidate with conventional qualifications (unlike, say, Carly Fiorina or Ben Carson), and he is in the Republican mainstream on policy (unlike Rand Paul). A sudden surge in public opinion would make a lot of his liabilities look less formidable. Christie may have a better chance of creating a surge moment than most other long shots in the 2016 race — Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, Rick Perry, John Kasish and Rick Santorum. I suspect a poll of Republican operatives might find that opinion widespread. Any candidate in the 2016 cycle can have a polling surge. But only plausible nominees (that is, those who have conventional credentials and mainstream party positions on policy) can take advantage of such a leap. If one of them suddenly moves to the top of the heap early, then party actors might rush to support him or her. (By contrast, if a Carson or a Fiorina gets the same polling rush, the party figures wouldn’t jump on board; they might even try to derail such a contender.) A public-opinion groundswell isn’t enough to clinch the nomination (ask Rick Perry, who lost his 2012 momentum in his awful debate performances). But the eventual winner needs to get such a lift at some point in his or her campaign. We understand how those surges happen. A candidate who attracts national media attention early in the cycle, long before most voters are paying attention, is likely to receive even higher rankings in subsequent polls because voters are likely to think first of candidates whose names they’ve seen more recently. That showing leads to more media attention, producing even larger poll numbers. (Are those public-opinion surges, and the campaign events that spark them, really that random? I don’t think we political scientists have a good handle on the answer yet.) In Christie’s case, even if he moves back up in the polls temporarily, his prospects are dismal, as reflected in his campaign’s own spin. His team is trying to make us believe, for example, that Vermont and Massachusetts — where they believe Christie will do well — are crucial Republican primaries. With no endorsements from governors to tout, his campaign is reduced to letting Politico know that “he occasionally texts” with Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina as an example of his (potential?) party support in early primary states. Still, none of the other viable candidates — not Jeb Bush nor Marco Rubio nor Scott Walker nor others — has stepped up over the last six months, so at least Christie hasn’t fallen any further behind. For a few more months, that’s probably all it takes to make sticking around a reasonable choice. *Green Pressure Applied Against Christie on Cap and Trade as He Enters Presidential Fray <http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/green-pressure-applied-against-christie-on-cap-and-trade-as-he-enters-presidential-fray/> // The Blaze // Kevin Mooney – July 4, 2015* With Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey now officially entering the presidential fray, his decision to withdraw from a multi-state “cap and trade” coalition, is expected to come under increased scrutiny and criticism. Christie announced his decision during a May 2011 press conference much to the consternation of environmental activists who hold considerable power and influence in the state. The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, widely known as RGGI, calls for participating states to cut their emissions by 10 percent. During his press conference, the Republican governor described RGGI as an ineffective, counterproductive program that would result in higher costs for state residents without producing any tangible environmental benefits. “RGGI does nothing more than tax electricity, tax our citizens, tax our businesses, with no discernable or measurable impact upon our environment. Because states such as Pennsylvania are not RGGI members it’s just possible that by making the cap too stringent clean New Jersey plants would be forced to close only to be replaced by power from dirty Pennsylvania coal plants,” Christie said. “It doesn’t make any sense environmentally or economically and the continuation of this tax makes no sense for my efforts and the Lieutenant Governor’s continued efforts to make New Jersey a more business-friendly environment and a place where private sector jobs can continue to be created.” But now, there is a movement afoot at the state level that could force N.J. back into a “cap and trade” arrangement in anticipation of federal regulations built around President Obama’s Clean Power Plan proposal. Team Obama is aiming for a 30 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2030. The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to release a new rule later this year, perhaps as early as August, setting state-by-state goals for reducing carbon emissions. Legal analysts familiar with the EPA proposal have expressed concern that state officials could be persuaded to embrace a “back door cap and trade” strategy as a way to preempt federal regulations. This approach would avoid straight up and down votes in state legislatures where opposition to cap and trade policies could gather strength, they warn. “The politics of carbon trading has generally been pretty toxic whenever it comes up at the federal level,” Gregory Sopkin, a partner at Wilkinson, Barker Knauer, LLP, said in an interview. “Even during the Obama Administration when it had Democrats in control of both houses of Congress, cap and trade didn’t pass because the public generally opposed. So now, with about 30 state legislatures controlled by Republicans, you can imagine that a lot of environmental groups are not going to like this sort of political accountability we could have if a proposal needed to pass both chambers.” But in those states where political opposition would most likely scuttle cap and trade proposals, a “Common Elements Approach” could be presented as a “middle ground” where states craft their own individual, as opposed to multi-state, plans to achieve certain emissions targets, according to a white paper Sopkin co-authored on behalf of his firm. “The state adopting this approach with select common elements in its state plan could, after approval by EPA of the individual state plan, partner with states with similar state plans and effectively back in to multi-state CO2 trading markets,” the paper explains. “These markets would not necessarily share common regions or electrical interconnections, but would share ‘common elements.’ ” At the state level, there is growing concern over the impact a “federal implementation plan” or FIP, could have on the coal industry, Sopkin noted. For this reason, state officials are willing to entertain alternative carbon trading plans folded within the “Common Elements Approach” that would supposedly provide them with greater flexibility, he said. Environmental organizations such as the Center for New Energy Economy, which is part of Colorado State University, The Great Plains Institute based in Minneapolis, Minn., the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy based in Knoxville, Tenn. and RGGI have been organizing meetings with state officials across the country. “Not all of the meetings are publicized, and they take many forms, but we do know these groups support the EPA plan and that they are pushing the states in a certain direction,” Matthew Larson, an associate with the firm and a co-author of the paper, said. Michael Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York, has been a particularly active player in the northeast while Jay Nixon, the governor of Missouri, has been holding court with environmentalists in his state, Larson added. Where Christie is concerned, RGGI was never enforceable between states. He was able to take advantage of the fact that any state could leave the coalition at any time. However, this would not be an option under the EPA proposal. “RGGI is different from the Common Elements Approach in which each state would have its own plan, which involves trading with other states,” Sopkin said. “Ultimately, we don’t believe RGGI is an adequate model for what the EPA would require.” If new regional agreements are implemented, it is possible N.J. could be forced back into the cap and trade plan similar to what Christie unraveled back in 2011. So what happens if a state presses ahead with carbon trading without any new legislation under the Clean Power Plan? “I would expect, parties within that state will bring suit saying you do not have the authority to do this,” Sopkin said. “But you could also see litigation from the other side if they don’t believe the plan is sufficient enough to comply with the EPA requirements. You could have citizen suits involving Sierra Club and other environmental groups. There could be a lot of pressure on both sides.” But just prior to Christie’s official announcement on Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court added a new wrinkle that could solidify state opposition to green regulatory schemes. In Michigan v. EPA, the justices overturned an EPA rule for reducing emissions of mercury and other substances from coal-fired power plants. As this decision could set a strong precedent for cases that involve EPA overreach, states and utilities may want to stay their hand and avoid preemptively complying with the agency’s climate rule before legalities are settled. That’s what the language of the ruling strongly suggests. Christie’s decision to withdraw from cap and trade has been opposed by N.J. environmental groups and Democratic lawmakers. He has vetoed bills that called for the state to rejoin RGGI. Even so, the governor has sent out mixed signals on environmental policies that he will need to clarify on the campaign trail. Back in November 2010, he expressed skepticism toward the idea that human activity drove climate change during a town hall meeting in Toms River, N.J. But during the press conference announcing his decision to withdraw from RGGI, he moved decisively in the opposite direction while also embracing wind and solar power initiatives. Recall that Christie was endorsed by the N.J. Environmental Federation during his first run for governor. Since then, he has lost support from the greenies, but hasn’t exactly convinced conservatives across the country of his free-market credentials. He has arrived at the point where it is necessary to clarify his position on the “science” underpinning global warming alarmism. *Christie campaign surges ahead on road to failure <http://lasvegassun.com/news/2015/jul/04/christie-campaign-surges-ahead-road-failure/> // Las Vegas Sun // Jonathan Bernstein – July 4, 2015* Of the nine Republican presidential candidates I consider viable, I have New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who made his bid official Tuesday, as dead last. From the start, he was probably too moderate to have much of a chance at the nomination, and it wasn’t clear whether Republicans nationwide would ever warm to his New Jersey style. While conservatives might have forgiven him for some of his positions (as they did Mitt Romney), they wouldn’t forget his embrace of Barack Obama after Hurricane Sandy, just before the 2012 election. Then the trouble his staff created in blocking traffic on the George Washington Bridge destroyed his November electability argument by attaching a scandal to his candidacy. Still, he remains a candidate with conventional qualifications (unlike, say, Carly Fiorina or Ben Carson), and he is in the Republican mainstream on policy (unlike Rand Paul). A sudden surge in public opinion would make a lot of Christie’s liabilities look less formidable. Christie may have a better chance of creating a surge moment than most other long shots in the 2016 race: Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, Rick Perry, John Kasish and Rick Santorum. I suspect a poll of Republican operatives might find that opinion widespread. Any candidate in the 2016 cycle can have a polling surge. But only plausible nominees (that is, those who have conventional credentials and mainstream party positions on policy) can take advantage of such a leap. If one of them suddenly moves to the top of the heap early, party actors might rush to support him or her. (By contrast, if a Ben Carson or a Carly Fiorina gets the same polling rush, the party figures wouldn’t jump on board; they might even try to derail such a contender.) A public-opinion groundswell isn’t enough to clinch the nomination (ask Perry, who lost his 2012 momentum in his awful debate performances). But the eventual winner needs to get such a lift at some point in his or her campaign. We understand how those surges happen. A candidate who attracts national media attention early in the cycle, long before most voters are paying attention, is likely to receive even higher rankings in subsequent polls because voters are likely to think first of candidates whose names they’ve seen more recently. That showing leads to more media attention, producing even larger poll numbers. (Are those public-opinion surges, and the campaign events that spark them, really that random? I don’t think we political scientists have a good handle on the answer yet.) In Christie’s case, even if he moves back up in the polls temporarily, his prospects are dismal, as reflected in his campaign’s own spin. His team is trying to make us believe, for example, that Vermont and Massachusetts — where his team members believe Christie will do well — are crucial Republican primaries. With no endorsements from governors to tout, his campaign is reduced to letting Politico know that “he occasionally texts” with Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina as an example of his (potential?) party support in early primary states. Still, none of the other viable candidates — not Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker or others — has stepped up over the past six months, so at least Christie hasn’t fallen any further behind. For a few more months, that’s probably all it takes to make sticking around a reasonable choice. *In N.H., Christie says he’s ‘Telling It Like It Is’ <http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/07/03/christie-talks-largely-about-himself/XXUrB90rOxkpETbCrYo86K/story.html?p1=Article_Related_Box_Article> // Boston Globe // James Pindell – July 4, 2015* SANDOWN, N.H. — Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey, in the middle of a five-day presidential announcement tour in New Hampshire, travels with a campaign banner that says “Telling It Like It Is.” But the “it” Christie talks about these days is mostly himself. This week Christie became the 14th Republican to announce his intention to run for president in 2016. Two years ago Christie led the field, but he is in a much weakened position today. Under his watch, New Jersey has undergone nine credit rating downgrades. The state is ranked 48th in private-sector job growth. He faces a public employee pension crisis. In addition, the so-called Bridgegate scandal, involving his once inner circle of aides, is still not over. And when it comes to issues, Christie, a moderate, is hardly a darling of the Republican base. As a result, in his presidential announcement launch and during five straight days of campaigning in the Granite State, Christie has treated the presidential contest like a season of “The Bachelorette”: trying to win over voters with charm and personal rapport. His answers to voters’ questions are laced with “man” and “buddy” and “let me tell ya.” When Hillary Rodham Clinton and Jeb Bush released their announcement videos, they featured everyday people talking about their lives. Christie’s pitch was two minutes of the candidate talking about the moment his mother died. He has repeated the story at town hall meetings in New Hampshire. He has given marital advice, revealed how often he gets a test for prostate cancer, and told a lengthy story about his daughter’s Notre Dame tuition bill. “The first thing that came to mind after seeing him is that he has a strong personality,” said New Hampshire state Representative Joe Hagan, a Republican from Chester, who attended Christie’s town hall meeting in Sandown on Tuesday night. Privately his aides note that Christie is trying, in part, to use the playbook of Republican John McCain’s win in the 2000 New Hampshire primary. Like McCain back then, he is essentially skipping Iowa, running an underdog campaign on the cheap, and hoping his big personality will win people over at endless town hall meetings at VFW halls, schools, diners, and even bars. Whether this approach will work is unclear. Sarah Crawford Stewart, a key New Hampshire aide to McCain in both his 2000 and 2008 victories, said Christie faces a more complicated campaign than McCain did 16 years ago. “Back then, McCain was the only Republican really going after independent voters who can vote in the Republican primary,” Crawford Stewart said. “I think there is a lot of opportunity in that space this year, and more Republican candidates are going to be going after that group later in the campaign than even these candidates realize.” Still, Christie’s performance at the 138 town hall meetings he has held in New Jersey made him a prominent national politician. Christie aides believe they can recreate the magic of his YouTube town hall moments in another state. “Christie is an excellent campaigner in small groups — he is engaging and funny, and can connect,” said David Redlawsk, who heads up the Rutgers-Eagleton Poll in New Jersey. Jodi Nelson, vice chairwoman of the Derry Republicans, said Christie is standing out by being a truth-teller. “At this point in the contest, people are just trying to get a sense of all of these candidates, and Christie is someone out trying to meet everyone,” Nelson said. Boston College political science professor Dave Hawkins says Christie is bringing a different style of campaign than McCain did. “Their approach to what they call ‘straight talk’ is different,” Hawkins said. “McCain used humor and tried to bring everyone together. He called for campaign finance reform and an end to pork-barrel spending as a way to demonstrate he was an honest broker against the system.” Christie tries to earn points by going after political opponents — liberals, Democrats, and teachers’ unions, Hawkins said. “McCain also had an inspiring war hero biography that was central to his story,” he said. “When people think of Christie, they think of a brash New Jersey guy who yells at people.” But these days Christie is doing less yelling. His style, he says, is “take or leave it.” “I am going to tell you what I think. If you like it, great. And if you don’t, my goodness, there are 13 other candidates to pick from, so you will find somebody who you agree with more than you agree with me. But you need to know what you are buying,” Christie said. To Jeff Pattera of Sandown, that approach puts Christie in the top tier of candidates he might support in the February presidential primary. In modern politics, Pattera said, Christie’s personality “is refreshing.” *Here's Chris Christie's big problem in a nutshell <http://www.businessinsider.com/chris-christie-problems-2015-7#ixzz3ezerbgnx> // Business Insider // Brett Logiurato – July 4, 2015* New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) has a big problem. Two years ago, when he was a candidate for governor, he was the big-tent candidate. He was attractive to both conservative and moderate Republican voters. And he attracted a broad swath of traditionally Democratic voters — he won 48% of the Latino vote, one-fifth of the African-American vote, and 31% of Democrats overall. Two years later, as he officially dips his toe into the race for president, he's no one's candidate. "His issue at this point is that both moderates and conservatives within the GOP hate him," said Tom Jensen, the director of Public Policy Polling. "There was a time when maybe you could see everyone else splitting the conservatives and Christie getting the centrists, but even they don't like him now." Two years after being touted as potentially the GOP's best hope against Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton, Christie faces a steep uphill climb to the Republican nomination. He's boxed in by members of his own party who are similar to him ideologically. And he's lost his appeal as a moderate candidate because people have grown tired of his brash personality. That is manifesting itself in early-voting states like Iowa — which Christie has been mostly avoiding so far, opting instead to press full-steam ahead into New Hampshire. Home Depot founder Ken Langone, perhaps Christie's most significant donor and Wall Street supporter, said "the hell with Iowa" in an interview this week, leading to a round of bad press in the state. Iowa Republicans are souring on him, too — just 28% view him favorably, according to a recent Des Moines Register poll, compared with 58% who view him unfavorably. "His problem is that there isn't even a single fix for his problems," Jensen said. "Some people don't like him because he's too liberal, some people don't like him because he's a jerk, some people don't like him because he's a Cowboys fan. It would be hard enough to overcome one of those problems, but near impossible to overcome all of them." The chart below shows the change in Christie's fortunes, illustrating how the percentages of Americans who hold favorable and unfavorable views of the New Jersey governor have shifted over time. Christie's net favorability peaked in January 2013, when 51% of Americans had a favorable opinion, and just 23% had an unfavorable opinion. Those numbers have flipped upside-down, with polling last month showing 27% favorable and 55% unfavorable: Over the past year and a half, different elements have pummeled his image in and out of his home state. There's the Bridgegate scandal, to which he was never directly linked but which clearly damaged his reputation as an executive. Then there's his economic record: He has endured nine credit downgrades, and New Jersey's credit rating is second-worst in the nation. He has had continual problems with his state's budget. And Democrats point to the fact that New Jersey ranks 48th in job creation. "He likes to tell people that he isn’t responsible for New Jersey’s economic failures because he inherited a bad economy," one Democratic strategist told Business Insider. "But since the Great Recession the country has bounced back and New Jersey’s neighboring states haven’t just recovered all the jobs they lost – they’ve added significantly more." One poll released this week displayed, in brutal fashion, how his home state's voters have turned on him. Among the highlights: A clear majority (57%) of New Jerseyans think Christie should resign now that he is officially running for president, compared with 37% who think he should be allowed to stay in office. His approval rating in the state sits at just 36%, compared with 58% who disapprove. Christie trails Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton, 49-32, in a hypothetical general-election matchup. Christie also trails his Republican opponents in primary matchups. Republican voters in the state think both former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and US Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida) would make better presidents. And Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker draws even with Christie. Then there's this: Just 27% of New Jersey residents say Christie would make a good president, compared with 69%. Christie is well aware of this fact, and he has attributed it in an interview with Fox News' Megyn Kelly to the notion that "a lot of those people ... want me to stay" as governor. But Monmouth followed up with poll respondents in an attempt to fact check Christie's claim. It found that just 5% who said Christie wouldn't make a good president said they gave that response because they hope he stays on as governor. On the other hand, 89% confirmed for a second time that they really think he would make a bad president. “I’m not sure how the governor defines ‘a lot,’ but any common sense usage of the term would have to be significantly greater than five percent,” said Patrick Murray, the director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute. *Christie enters the race: Swinging for the fence <http://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-guest-writers/swinging-forthefences-1.1368883> // North Jersey // Matthew Hale – July 4, 2015* CHRIS CHRISTIE is a Met Fan. There is always hope. Despite almost identical records this year, Yankee fans have a lot more confidence in their team's playoff chances than Met fans do. That is because the Yankees always have an air of inevitability about them; the Mets? It's always about hope. In the summer of 2011, Chris Christie was the Yankees. Every spring Yankee fans expect them to make the World Series. Even Yankee haters have the sense that no matter what they do, the Yankees will in fact make it to the Promised Land. Back in 2011 Christie was full of confidence and swagger, and even his harshest critics seemed resigned to the fact he was eventually headed to the World Series of politics otherwise known as the White House. In the summer of 2015, Chris Christie is the Mets. In the end, while Mets and Christie fans alike hope they can go all the way, they have a gut sense that maybe this is not their year. Hope flourishes Last week Governor Christie formally announced he was running for president. For all candidates, announcement week is a time where hope flourishes and nothing is inevitable. It is no exception with Christie. So since he is a diehard Mets fan, here are a few things that Christie has to "hope" will happen for him to thread the needle and win his party's nomination. 1) A solid re-introduction to inattentive primary voters I took my generally-indifferent-to-electoral-politics 12-year-old daughter to Christie's formal announcement at Livingston High School on June 30. Her thoughts afterward spoke volumes. What stood out to her were his "conviction and honesty." I know my jaw dropped also, but, hey, she is only 12. However, I soon realized that my daughter was probably like many voters in Iowa and New Hampshire. She doesn't (nor should she) pay enough attention to what is going on in New Jersey politics to realize that voter sentiment in the state toward the governor is such that those terms may well rest on the bottom of a list of adjectives they'd invoke to describe him. Much has been made of how low Christie's poll ratings are in New Jersey and even his overall negative ratings nationwide. However, like my daughter, at this point voters in Iowa and especially New Hampshire probably don't care or don't know about New Jersey or his record in it. What they will soon know is what my daughter saw. Christie still has the capacity to deliver a gut-grabbing, straight-talk juggernaut town hall performance that has the room believing every single word. That counts for a lot in New Hampshire and Iowa, where it is all about seeing the candidates face to face. Christie has to hope that he connects with voters in New Hampshire in the same way he connected with my daughter and the crowd in Livingston this week. 2) The YouTube monster reawakens I did a quick YouTube search by candidate names and then sorted them by number of views. The overall lesson is: Get on Jimmy Fallon's show. Christie doing "Dad Dancing with Jimmy Fallon" has been viewed almost 9 million times, while Jeb Bush's recent slow jam of the news with Fallon is just under 1.5 million views. But even this back-of-the-envelope look shows that Christie owns YouTube, at least among serious (e.g. non-Trump) candidates. He has almost 20 different posts with more than 200,000 hits. That is more than current frontrunners Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and Scott Walker combined. Christie must reawaken the kind of viral video activity he had back when he was a Yankee. Luckily for the governor, the debates, his town hall-style meetings and New Hampshire in general are a natural breeding ground for the YouTube moments that can make or break candidates. Can you imagine how many hits Gary Hart's 1984 axe throwing would have today? Christie and his team have the capacity to create a moment like that and he has to hope it happens. 3) Christie's jabs become haymakers that land Christie has been on his best behavior lately. It has been a long time since he called anyone an "idiot" or "numbnuts." As a result, we haven't been focusing on one of the governor's greatest strengths. He will take on anyone, anywhere, anytime. In his announcement speech, Christie took a few smacks at President Obama and "Second Mate" Hillary Clinton. But he also took some vague jabs at fellow Republicans. Earlier this year, he was a little more pointed when in the space of about six hours he took swings at Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz and his favorite target, Rand Paul. In a field of 15 plus, presidential candidates can either try to stay above the fray hoping to look more presidential or they can attack their opponents with joy and vigor. Guess which one is better suited for Christie? He is, perhaps, the best debater of the bunch. A well-placed haymaker from Christie might make Jeb Bush look entitled and privileged; Scott Walker or Marco Rubio inexperienced and untested; or any of the other candidates just plain crazy and unelectable. Christie has to hope that happens. Even better if he can make those moments go viral. Every year the Mets have moments of magic and hope. So far this year it has been early outings from rookie pitchers Noah Syndergaard and Steven Matza and an 11-game winning streak back in April. But talk to most Met fans and while they are still hopeful, they are expecting the inevitable bad news to come. Christie has done an amazing job at steadying his sinking ship and repositioning himself to make a serious run for his party's nomination. His opening announcement tour continues to be well received and he clearly has the talent and capacity to throw a couple of no hitters. There is hope in the Christie camp. *For Chris Christie, Freedom Means Nothing Left to Lose as New Jersey Voters Want Him to Resign <http://www.politicususa.com/2015/07/04/chris-christie-freedom-means-left-lose-jersey-resign.html> // Politicus // Sarah Jones – July 4, 2015* New Jersey wants to be free of Governor Chris Christie (R-NJ) according to a Monmouth University poll taken after the Governor announced his bid for the Republican presidential nomination. It’s not that they don’t want to lose Christie, either, contrary to what Christie believes. Only 5% said that’s why they don’t want Christie to run. It’s more that they really, really, really do not think he will be a good President. In fact, a majority would like the Republican governor to resign. From the Monmouth University poll released on Thursday: A large majority feels that Christie has abandoned his commitment to the state and few say he is a good fit for the Oval Office. Just 27% of New Jerseyans say Chris Christie would make a good president. More than two-thirds (69%) say he would not. A few months ago, Christie was asked on national TV about similar poll results. He responded that survey participants told pollsters he would not make a good president because “a lot of those people…want me to stay.” Monmouth followed up with the participants in our poll and found that just 5% of those who said he would not make a good president say they gave that response because they would rather have Christie stay in New Jersey. Fully 89% of this group, though, confirmed that their answer meant they really think he would make a bad president. And…. New Jersey would like Chris Christie to resign. Fifty-seven percent of Garden State residents want Christie to get out of the Governor’s mansion, and only 26% say he can run for president and govern New Jersey effectively at the same time: A majority (57%) of Garden State residents say the governor should resign now that he’s thrown his hat into the ring, compared to 37% who say he should stay in office. Even more New Jerseyans (71%) feel that Christie cannot run for president and govern New Jersey effectively at the same time. Just 26% say he can do both well. “Chris Christie may be looking for a new job. Just don’t expect his current employer to provide a good reference,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute. Familiarity breeds contempt and all of that. They hate him in New Jersey. So, like a Republican lost in his Fox bubble, Christie figures this means he should run for national office. You are probably thinking about reality and history and how being hated in the state where a candidate is currently in office doesn’t bode well for running for a bigger office, but being hated and hatred are working out super well for Donald Trump. The Republican expert in bankruptcy is currently polling in second place for his party’s nomination. There is nothing the Republican base likes more than someone America hates. Freedom for Christ Christie this Fourth of July is just another word for nothing left to lose. *PERRY* *New Hampshire Republicans Not Ruling Perry Out <https://www.texastribune.org/2015/07/04/new-hampshire-republicans-not-ruling-perry-out/> // Texas Tribune // Abby Livingston – July 4, 2015* DERRY, N.H. — If Rick Perry has a base in New Hampshire, it’s made up of women and veterans. At a Friday night campaign event, an adoring crowd ate up every word from the Texas governor. Perry playfully referred to each female supporter he met as "girl," no matter her age. And when the party’s hostess presented him with a New Hampshire-shaped pin, he said, “Pin me.” And with only two veterans in the GOP nomination hunt, veterans say they have a special affinity for Perry, a former Air Force cargo pilot. Perry’s New Hampshire political team ensured that parallel-parked cars outside snaked down the street for blocks. But attendance isn’t commitment among New Hampshire’s high-maintenance, fickle electorate. Even the event’s host, retired Air Force fighter pilot Rob Hampton, is still on the fence. “He’s on our short list,” he said of Perry. New Hampshire and Iowa, the other early primary state, are small enough in population that Perry has enough time as an out-of-office former official to make his case. Candidates like Ted Cruz, meanwhile, are tied down with official duties. Betty Gay, a relocated Texan who now lives in New Hampshire, was at the event and said she liked Perry’s economic positions. But she worries about Republican candidates taking a hard line on gay marriage and abortion and alienating women and voters with friends and family members who are gay. “That’s my concern,” the retired Lamar University graduate said. New Hampshire is traditionally more economically conservative than Iowa. Perry cautiously answered a question on the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent gay marriage ruling. “I agree with those four justices that were on the losing side is who I agree with,” Perry said. “But the fact is, we’re a rule-of-law country and they make decisions up there that from time to time I don’t agree with. But we are a country of rules and laws, and if we get away from that, we’ve lost everything that we have.” He then promised to appoint conservative judges as president. “He finally got to the answer where he said we are a nation of laws, even if we don’t like them,” Gay said. “So I thought that was the answer. But I got the impression he didn’t really want to come out and say it’s a non-issue… because he knows some people here are very upset about it.” In contrast, New Hampshire state Rep. Ken Weyler is all-in for Perry. Weyler does not want Perry to just do well in New Hampshire – his aim is for Perry to run the table. Weyler is part of a conservative initiative called the “603 Alliance.” 603 is the state’s area code, and the group seeks to consolidate conservative support behind a single candidate so that Democratic and registered Independent voters cannot cross over and determine the nominee in the state’s open Republican primary. But six months out from that election, Perry lags behind his GOP rivals in state polling. A decisive victory over the crowded and talented GOP field is a tall order for Perry. “We have to start emphasizing, we want a resume, not a slogan. We want something real,” Weyler said. “And we want a record of accomplishment. We want a veteran… I’m trying to get the veteran vote behind him.” Like a Perry campaign swing in March, the candidate’s articulate and wide-ranging stump speech played well in this setting. Voter by voter, Perry is effectively erasing memories of his 2011 debate flop. “For crying out loud!” Gay said when asked about Perry’s 2011 troubles. “If anybody can say they have never been deep into a discussion and all of the sudden their mind switches to a different track…” “Baloney!” she exclaimed. Perry’s Texas rival for the GOP nomination, Cruz, will spend the Fourth of July doing campaign and book tour events in Greenville, South Carolina. *Report: Perry Emerges as Trump's Biggest Critic Among GOP Rivals // Newsmax <file:///C:\Report\%20Perry%20Emerges%20as%20Trump's%20Biggest%20Critic%20Among%20GOP%20Rivals%20%20Read%20Latest%20Breaking%20News%20from%20Newsmax.com%20http\::www.newsmax.com:Headline:Rick-Perry-Donald-Trump-immigration-Texas:2015:07:04:id:653475:#ixzz3f0Hdd6bm Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!> // Todd Beamon – July 4, 2015* Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry is emerging as the strongest critic of fellow Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and his controversial remarks on illegal immigrants. "I don't think Donald Trump's remarks reflect the Republican Party," Perry said Thursday after a speech at the National Press Club in Washington in which he called on the GOP to reach out to African Americans in the upcoming election. He sharpened his attacks later in an interview with Fox News, The Texas Tribune reports. "I think that was huge error on his part and, number one, it's wrong," Perry said of Trump's remarks on illegals in his June 16 announcement speech. "What I would say is that we want somebody who’s actually dealt with this before, not somebody that’s just going to shoot from the hip. "I will suggest to you I know how to secure the border, and the border security is the real issue here," he said. Perry, who stepped down in January as the Lone Star State's longest-serving governor, last year deployed 1,000 National Guard troops to the Texas-Mexico border to combat the surge in illegal immigrant children pouring into the country. His Thursday attacks on Trump marked a sharp departure from Perry's comments the previous day, in which he told Fox that the billionaire developer's remarks on immigration simply were ones "that I certainly wouldn't have made." Perry's campaign, however, played Thursday's criticism for all that it was worth, the Tribune reports. Staffers immediately released the comments to reporters, with video from the interview and transcripts highlighting the remarks. Perry himself even sent out this Twitter message linking to the release: In response, Trump criticized Perry on Saturday, telling Fox News the former governor had not done more "in terms of protecting people" from illegals crossing the South Texas border. Still, Perry remains far behind Trump in the polls. He finished 8 percentage points behind Trump, who placed second, with 12 percent of those surveyed saying that they supported him. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush finished first, with 19 percent. *GRAHAM* *Republican presidential candidate Lindsey Graham has a stark warning for the US <http://www.businessinsider.com/lindsey-graham-has-a-stark-warning-for-the-us-2015-7> // Business Insider // Maxwell Tani – July 4, 2015* Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) has a warning for the US: if we don't reform entitlements, we could end up like Greece. On Saturday, the Republican presidential candidate told Business Insider that the US risks a Greek-style financial crisis if Congress doesn't reform entitlement programs. "If you can't do a grand bargain where you reform entitlements and flatten out the tax code, we could become Greece," Graham said. Years of debt and subsequent austerity measures have stifled the Greek economy. This week, Greece defaulted on its loan payments to the International Monetary Fund. The country will vote Sunday on a referendum that will decide if Greece will accept another bailout from its three main creditors: the IMF, the European Central Bank, and the European Commission In order to prevent a similar situation, Graham proposed a broad range of solutions outlined in the 2012 Simpson-Bowles plan — a broad, relatively centrist entitlement reform plan that died in Congress. The Senator said that in order to curb rising costs of Medicare, Social Security, and other programs, he'd raise the retirement age, trim benefits, and flatten out the tax code. Graham said he would be willing to eliminate some tax deductions to get centrist Democrats on board. Graham told Business Insider that the Senate Democrats like Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-New York) and Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) had expressed interest in entitlement reform, as long as the plans included new revenue. The South Carolina Senator said his plan may upset the hard-liners of both parties, but could be a good compromise. "You're not going to get Bernie Sanders, you're probably not going to get the folks on the right to agree on revenue," Graham said. "We got to have a bipartisan plan in order to avoid becoming Greece." It's unlikely the US would run into a problem like Greece's, since the US controls the currency that it owes its debt in. If the debt became too great, the US could physically print its way out of debt, which would devalue its currency significantly and lead to inflation, but would not leave the country at the mercy of the IMF or other creditors. The South Carolina Senator also brushed off concerns about Greece leaving the European Union and seeking a greater alliance with Russia. "That'd be like getting a ticket on the Titanic. I'm not so sure that's the way to go for Greece," Graham said. *Graham sees 'perfect storm' from terror <http://www.unionleader.com/article/20150705/NEWS0605/150709646&source=RSS> // Union Leader // Dan Tuohy – July 4, 2015* MANCHESTER - Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said the U.S. government is losing the ability to defend Americans "because of stupid politics." The Republican presidential hopeful spoke before campaigning in New Hampshire on the Fourth of July, when the State Department warned about potential terror threats related to the holiday weekend. Graham, long a defense hawk, continues to advocate for more robust national security and surveillance. "People kind of push back on me that I'm too much of an alarmist - that I'm over-selling. I don't think I am," Graham said in an interview with the New Hampshire Union Leader. "I think there's a perfect storm brewing out there for us to get hit hard. In the face of increased threats, we are literally reducing our defense and intelligence capability." Graham had argued for renewal of the Patriot Act to ensure the National Security Agency maintains surveillance authority. Graham, a retired Air Force lawyer and judge advocate, sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee. This weekend was the first time Graham campaigned in New Hampshire since the shooting in a church in Charleston, S.C., two weeks ago. Graham postponed a visit in order to be in his home state to address the murders, including controversy over the Confederate flag flying on state house grounds. Graham, in a change of position on the flag, joined other leaders in his state in calling for the flag to be removed from state house grounds. Graham, in the interview, shook his head as he said he still cannot understand how a 21-year-old like Dylann Roof could go into a church, be invited to worship, and then shoot people. "That's a level of hate that's hard to understand," Graham said. Roof was arrested and charged with killing nine people at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston. "But at the end of the day, 48 hours after the shooting, the families appeared in court to confront the killer. They say, 'You destroyed my life, but I forgive you, I love you.' That kind of love can only come from God," Graham said. "It changed my state. There's been a soul-searching in South Carolina like I have never seen. Churches have been full. People have been reaching out, holding each other. The flag will come down Monday. It won't solve all of our problems, but it is a step forward." *HUCKABEE* *Mike Huckabee Vows To Prosecute Attacks Against Gay Marriage Opponents As Hate Crimes <http://www.ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=21161&MediaType=1&Category=26> // On Top - July 4, 2015* Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee on Thursday denounced the Supreme Court ruling striking down state bans on gay marriage, saying that as president he would protect opponents. In a Fox News op-ed, Huckabee claimed that the Supreme Court's ruling was an “out-of-control act of unconstitutional judicial tyranny.” “While some cowardly politicians will wave the white flag and surrender to the false god of judicial supremacy, I refuse to light a match to our Constitution,” he wrote. “We must resist and reject judicial tyranny, not retreat.” Huckabee pledged as president to sign executive orders that “support traditional marriage and protect businesses, churches, non-profits, schools and universities, hospitals, and other organizations from discrimination, intimidation, civil penalties, or criminal attacks for exercising their religious beliefs” and direct the attorney general to “protect liberty and prosecute any violations of First Amendment rights of individuals, businesses, religious organizations, institutions, and civil servants, including those who believe in traditional marriage.” “The Justice Department will protect and defend the rights of American citizens to follow their religious convictions without discrimination, and prosecute attacks on people of faith and their religious liberty.” “I will aggressively prosecute attacks against people of faith as hate crimes,” he added. A graphic posted on the Huckabee campaign Facebook page quotes the former governor as saying, “An attack on Christians and their religious liberty is a hate crime that be prosecuted.” *FIORINA* *Lt. governor offers support to Fiorina <http://www.journalgazette.net/blog/political-notebook/Lt--governor-offers-support-to-Fiorina-7515578> // Journal Gazette // Niki Kelly & Brian Francisco – July 5, 2015 * Indiana Lt. Gov. Sue Ellspermann on Monday announced that she supports Republican Carly Fiorina in her bid for the presidency in 2016. “As a former business owner, I appreciate that Carly, previous CEO of a Fortune 100 company, has the background to grow our economy and lead our country,” Ellspermann said. “With her breadth and depth of experience as a business leader, as the former Chair of the CIA’s Advisory Board and as the leader of multiple nonprofit organizations, Carly brings a fresh, yet informed perspective to Washington. I believe Carly will place problem-solving before politics, a behavior Americans desire and deserve.” Ellspermann will co-chair Fiorina’s Indiana efforts with Suzanne Jaworowski, the communications and government affairs director for Hallador Energy/Sunrise Coal. A news release said Ellspermann and Jaworowski will work to communicate Fiorina’s unique credentials and accomplishments and will help build a grass-roots network of support. Fiorina is a businesswoman and former CEO of Hewlett-Packard. She is the only female Republican candidate and recently came in second in the Western Conservative Summit’s GOP presidential straw poll. Donnellyvisits Iraq Sen. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., is part of a congressional delegation that has been in Iraq on a fact-finding trip, his office announced Monday. The delegation met with U.S. military leaders and Iraqi officials, including Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, to discuss the fight against Islamic State militants in Iraq. “With more than 3,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and more on the way, I felt it was critical to hear directly from our commanders on the ground and our Iraqi allies – Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish – about the current strategy. We also discussed what role the U.S. and our coalition partners in the region should play going forward,” said Donnelly, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, in a statement. Donnelly is part of a delegation led by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va. According to Kaine’s office, others in the group are Democratic Reps. Brian Higgins of New York, Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, Stephen Lynch and Jim McGovern of Massachusetts and Peter Welch of Vermont. The delegation visited Iraq and Kuwait last weekend, traveled to Jordan on Monday and was in Turkey on Tuesday. Hale not running State Rep. Christina Hale, D-Indianapolis, announced Monday that she will campaign for re-election next year rather than run for an open U.S. Senate seat, the Associated Press reported. Hale’s decision leaves former U.S. Rep. Baron Hill, a native of Seymour, as the only announced Democratic candidate for the seat held by Republican Sen. Dan Coats, who will not seek re-election. Two Republicans – former state GOP Chairman Eric Holcomb of Indianapolis and U.S. Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-3rd, of Howe – seek to replace Coats. *JINDAL* *Bobby Jindal: The son of immigrants and new champion of the tough-on-immigrants crowd <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/07/04/bobby-jindal-the-son-of-immigrants-and-new-champion-of-the-tough-on-immigrants-crowd/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b> // WaPo // Janell Ross – July 4, 2015* Bobby Jindal lives in a very interesting and unique political space. He's one of many, many men and one woman vying for the GOP nomination in 2016. He's a young governor but is widely regarded as a withered-though-once-rising political star. He's the first Indian-American to be considered a serious candidate for the White House, but he shuns that label and believes that every American should strive to live a non-hyphenated experience. He's the pro-melting pot candidate in a world in which the American salad bowl is seen as a hipper or at least more inclusive national metaphor. He expresses significant concern about the danger he insists some immigrants can represent in the United States and countries abroad. And this month, all of that may have attracted more attention than Jindal's formal announcement that he's running for president. First, a bit of background. In January, Jindal took a trip to Europe, gave some speeches and did some interviews. They included the idea that some European countries have mistakenly allowed Muslim immigrants to establish almost autonomous communities in which strict religious laws, known as Sharia, govern life. Some of these places had become "no-go" zones for non-Muslims, Jindal claimed. Amid criticism that his comments were not only counterfactual but flavored by more than a little bit of influence from people like Pamela Geller, who has long warned of the dangers created by so-called "creeping Sharia," Jindal doubled down. In a satellite interview from London with CNN, Jindal said: I knew that by speaking the truth we were going to make people upset. ... The huge issue, the big issue in non-assimilation is the fact that you have people that want to come to our country but not adopt our values, not adopt our language and in some cases want to set apart their own enclaves and hold on to their own values. I think that’s dangerous. Then in February, Jindal came to Washington, D.C., addressed an anti-Common Core curriculum organization, and repeated these thoughts. All that was looming in the backdrop when Jindal announced his bid for the White House on June 24. And true to his politics, Jindal's speech included references to the exceptionalism of America, the experiences of his immigrant parents and the "assault" that Christianity faces. Then, he went on. As for me, I’m sick and tired of people dividing Americans. And I’m done with all this talk about hyphenated Americans. We are not Indian-Americans, Irish-Americans, African-Americans, rich Americans, or poor Americans – we are all Americans. While I’m at it, here’s another thing you aren’t allowed to say, but I’m going to say it anyway: We cannot allow people to immigrate to this country so that they can use our freedoms to undermine our freedoms. ... It is not unreasonable to demand that if you immigrate to America, you must do so legally, and you must be ready and willing to embrace our values, learn English and roll up your sleeves and get to work. That was all too much for a certain subset of Americans. For those whose social media accounts have yet to feature the #Jindian and #BobbyJindalIsSoWhite hashtags, please brace yourself. Writer Hari Kondabolu, formerly part of the writing team at the now-canceled political comedy show "Totally Biased with W. Kamau Bell," told the publication Colorlines that after Jindal's announcement, he was irritated. Kondabolu, who is Indian American, was bothered by what he sees as Jindal's cynical games with race and identity, fear of immigrants and the desire of older Indian Americans to be fully included in American life. So, he started the #BobbyJindalIsSoWhite hashtag. Then, he went at Jindal hard. Real hard. Soon, someone else shared their sense that Jindal pulled a downright #jindian move when he allowed official and unofficial gubernatorial portraits of himself to depict a man whose skin mysteriously appeared several shades lighter than Jindal's own to be hung in public spaces. And then there was this -- quite possibly the sharpest critique of them all -- from comedian and "Daily Show" alum Aasif Mandvi: It wasn't long before conservative fans of Jindal and others rose to Jindal's defense. They described the online commentary as deeply offensive, inappropriate, cruel and an exemplar of the left's hypocrisy. Jindal's campaign even had some fun with it, printing T-shirts with the slogan "Tanned. Rested. Ready." All that might have faded into the mass of ideas shared on social media if a pro-Jindal super PAC hadn't begun running ads in Iowa in recent days playing up -- what else -- Jindal's views about immigrants. “I think our immigration system is broken,” Jindal said in a clip included in the ad. “If folks want to immigrate to America, they should do so legally. They should adopt our values. They should learn English. And they should roll up their sleeves and get to work.” Here, we see the super PAC's version of Jindal, equipped and willing to say what others won't or can't about America's immigrants -- perhaps because he is the brown-skinned son of Indian Hindu immigrants. He "learned" English. He speaks with a vaguely Southern-American-inflected accent. He converted to Christianity. He rejects a life in which Indian Americans don't focus on the latter portion of that label. Why can't others just do the same? In fact, Jindal should be trusted to lead the United States, the argument goes, precisely because of all of the above. Jindal seems to subscribe to the idea that immigrants arrive with a range of deficits and can't become better until they become American in the ways that he believes matter. In the ad, it seems Jindal is American precisely because he believes in a constant effort to emulate and approximate "standard American-ness" -- what many would say is actually white-ness or at least a very muted Indian-American-ness -- whenever and however possible. Think that's reading a little too deeply? In January, while in London, Jindal shared these insights: I am not suggesting for one second that people should be shy or embarrassed about their ethnic heritage. But I am explicitly saying that it is completely reasonable for nations to discriminate between allowing people into their country who want to embrace their culture, or allowing people into their country who want to destroy their culture, or establish a separate culture within. Now, to be very clear, there are very large shares of Americans who share Jindal's views. The 2014 General Social Survey -- one of the most expansive looks at social attitudes and change in United States each year since 1972 -- found that a full 93 percent of Americans said that being able to speak English is very or fairly important to being an American, compared to just 64 percent who said that one's birthplace determines whether or not you're an American. In that same poll, 92 percent pointed to citizenship and 91 percent said following America's laws make you an American. But lest anyone think that Jindal's views are all there is, also consider this: In a September 2012 CNN/Opinion Research poll, Americans were nearly evenly split on questions of cultural assimilation. About 48 percent said it is better for the United States to encourage immigrants to blend in by "giving up some important aspects of their own culture." But 44 percent said the country should encourage, "immigrants to maintain their own culture" even if it means they "do not blend as well." And 5 percent said they thought some mixture of both approaches would be ideal. Finally, a Pew Research Center poll released in June 2014 found some appreciable differences between the way that white, black and Latino Americans view immigrants. And not surprisingly, there were even bigger differences between Republicans and Democrats. Now, Jindal is certainly entitled to advance whatever themes and policy ideas he thinks best. It's also worth noting that the content of the super PAC's ads are outside Jindal's control, even if they were created from snippets of his public speeches and closely mirror his own, oft-used rhetoric. But it's also clear that Jindal is one of the few candidates -- besides Donald Trump -- who has decided that talking about the threats he believes are posed by unassimilated immigrants is part of his path to the White House. Conservative defenders would do well not to aggressively police the way that Indian Americans discuss or even ridicule Jindal's choices. That obscures the kind of learning and information exchange -- no matter how embarrassing, squirm-inducing or painful -- that every American surely knows can come from humor and debate. At the same time, those who would dismiss Jindal as a political actor worthy of nothing more than identity-centered ridicule might do well to think about just how appealing a candidate willing to talk tough on immigration and push assimilation and speaking English can be to many Americans. *Bobby Jindal expresses optimism about his future in Iowa <http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/07/04/bobby-jindal-fourth-july-parades-urbandale-windsor-heights/29715415/> // Des Moines Register // Maya Kliger – July 4, 2015* Republican presidential hopeful Bobby Jindal wrapped up a five-day swing through Iowa with stops at two metro-area parades on Independence Day. The governor of Louisiana was encouraged by the reception he received throughout the week, and he said was optimistic about future trips back to the state hosting the first-in-the-nation caucuses. "I think this is a marathon, not a sprint. I think that we got great responses everywhere we went. Everywhere we went, people were signing up to be volunteers and to learn more about the campaign," he said. "But everywhere we went, we also committed that we'd be coming back, and we'd be spending a lot of time here. "We intend to do town halls and go to restaurants and factories, and do exactly what we've done this week, and do that over and over. And I think that will absolutely generate great results for us." In both Urbandale and Windsor Heights, Jindal eagerly spoke to people in the crowd, oftentimes falling behind the rest of the parade. Many of the people he spoke to, although not positive they will ultimately caucus for him, expressed support because of his conservative values and what they described as his genuine demeanor. "So far, he (Jindal) is my favorite. He seems like just a person, you know?" said Pat Green, 64, of Urbandale. "I think we need down-to-earth people to run our country because the majority of the country is down-to-earth." Despite the fact that Jindal is at the bottom of recent polls, he was recognized Saturday because of his campaign ads and media appearances. Those who knew of him at the parades referenced the video his campaign released of Jindal and his wife telling their children he was running for president, his ads concerning immigration and his interview this past week with Fox News commentator Sean Hannity. AT THE EVENT SETTINGS: Fourth of July parades in Urbandale and Windsor Heights. CROWDS: Jindal greeted dozens at both parades. REACTION: Many were eager to shake hands and take pictures with the governor, though few were sure that they'll be Jindal supporters. WHAT'S NEXT: Saturday was the last of a five-day swing through Iowa. The Jindal campaign is planning on coming back later in the month. *Jindal poses with gun at campaign stop, met with online mockery <http://www.statesman.com/news/news/national-govt-politics/bobby-jindal-poses-gun-campaign-stop-met-online-mo/nmrb6/> // Statesman // July 4, 2015* SIBLEY, Iowa — Republican presidential candidate and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal posted a photo of himself holding and admiring a weapon while at a campaign stop in Iowa Friday. Jindal’s photo caption reads: “My kind of campaign stop; Capital Armament in Sibley.” According to the company’s Facebook page, CapArms is a veteran-owned company that manufactures ammunition, firearms and smokeless gunpowder. Jindal has proven to be a strong supporter of gun ownership rights during his tenure as governor, signing several pro-gun rights bills into law in the state of Louisiana. Still, not everyone is buying Jindal’s affection for weapons, especially on social media. The photo received some mocking comments on Twitter, saying he was pandering to constituents and calling him a poser. One commenter called it Jindal’s Dukakis moment, referencing the 1988 campaign photo of Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis riding in a tank. Politico refers to that image as one of the “worst campaign backfires in history.” *Bobby Jindal’s former media director brands him ‘anti-gay’ and ‘destructive’ <https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/07/04/bobby-jindals-former-media-director-brand-him-anti-gay-and-destructive/> // Pink News // Nick Duffy – July 4, 2015* Republican Presidential hopeful Bobby Jindal has been attacked by his former head of news media. The Governor of Louisiana has in the past said his party doesn’t need the support of gay people, and has continually tried to force through “religious freedom” laws in his state which would allow anti-gay discrimination. However, in a column for the New Orleans Advocate, Jindal’s former news media director Taylor Huckaby lashed out at him. Mr Huckaby, who is gay, wrote: “During my years in the Jindal machine, I became entrenched in the culture that gave birth to what we see today: fire-and-brimstone Jindal, chomping at the bit to stand in the church house door and refuse Americans their individual right to marry the one they love. He continues: “I regret nothing more than my complicity in the state’s relentless attacks against my fellow LGBTQ citizens. “Being anti-gay was (and is) a system requirement for working in Louisiana conservative politics, and it bred a powerful self-hatred.” Savaging his former employer, he writes: “Jindal’s signature strategy of rallying bigotry diminishes in power with each passing moment. “Whatever procedural or bureaucratic chicanery he attempts in order to block our freedom to marry will be fruitless, petty and ultimately unsuccessful. “This Independence Day marks the final Fourth of July Louisiana will observe under Jindal’s dishonest, destructive administration — and also the first Fourth of July that queer Americans may marry whomever they choose. “For many, that’s something worth celebrating — and as Jindal fades into irrelevance, my deepest hope is that Louisiana elects new leaders who govern differently, leaders who prize fairness, charity, dignity, prudence and kindness above all.” Governor Jindal has previously defended anti-gay Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson, who has equated homosexuality with bestiality and claimed that AIDS is “God’s punishment” for homosexuality. The Governor claimed the Robertsons were “great citizens” of Louisiana, and went on to attack the “politically correct crowd” for criticising the comments by Robertson. The Human Rights Campaign earlier this year marked an op-ed from Governor Jindal – and he definitely didn’t pass with flying colours. An attempted put-down of President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address last year backfired, when Governor Jindal used the wrong “your” in a tweet. *Bobby Jindal Sued Over Anti-Gay Executive Order <http://www.edgeboston.com/news/news/180339/bobby_jindal_sued_over_anti-gay_executive_order> // Edge Media Network // John Reilly – July 4, 2015* Bobby Jindal had better get the lawyers ready. The ACLU Foundation of Louisiana, the Forum for Equality Foundation and six individual plaintiffs have filed a lawsuit challenging an executive order issued by the Louisiana governor that would allow people to discriminate against same-sex couples. The "Marriage and Conscience Order," as issued by Jindal in May, prohibits the state or its agents from denying tax exemptions or credits, grants, contracts, certification or accreditation from a person or business who refuses to provide services to LGBT people if they believe that doing so would violate their personal moral or religious beliefs regarding homosexuality or same-sex marriage. Jindal, a Republican presidential hopeful, issued the order after a bill that was similar in scope failed to obtain enough votes to move out of committee in the Louisiana House of Representatives. In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs argue that Jindal's order is unconstitutional because it goes beyond his authority as governor, as spelled out by the separation of powers clause in the Louisiana state constitution. The lawsuit also alleges that the order creates a special class of people and businesses who are protected due to their opposition to marriage equality, while other people and businesses who support marriage equality are not afforded those same rights. As a result of the protections afforded to only those who oppose marriage equality, the plaintiffs argue that the order essentially "sanctions discrimination" against not only same-sex couples, but those who support them. "Governor Jindal's unauthorized taking of the legislature's power to make new laws or change existing laws violates the Louisiana Constitution," the lawsuit reads. "Governor Jindal's 'Marriage and Conscience Order' also exceeds the authority granted to him for issuing executive orders. The governor is given authority to issue executive orders to see that laws are faithfully executed. The statute does not give the governor the authority to create a new law or overrule the legislature's decision to not pass a law." "Governor Jindal has violated the Louisiana Constitution by setting up special protections for those who share his belief system," said Marjorie Esman, the executive director of the ACLU Foundation of Louisiana. "In our country no one is above the law, including the Governor. He swore to uphold the laws of Louisiana. This lawsuit seeks to hold him to that oath." *Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal governs via cellphone <http://theadvocate.com/news/12819620-123/louisiana-gov-bobby-jindal-governs> // The Advocate // Mark Ballard & Marsha Shuler – July 4, 2015* Even before officially joining the presidential sweepstakes, Gov. Bobby Jindal spent far less time in Louisiana than his predecessors. Since announcing June 24 that he was seeking the Republican presidential nomination, Jindal has been in Louisiana only one day, according to campaign news releases and the lieutenant governor’s records. And with just six months left in his administration, Jindal is expected to spend more and more time in the early primary states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. He’ll be governing Louisiana by cellphone. “He has a tremendous amount of horsepower and bandwidth,” said Timmy Teepell, Jindal’s longtime political strategist. “He’ll be able to campaign and handle his duties as governor without a problem. He will keep a very busy schedule.” Even before he announced, Jindal spent a lot of time tending to politics out-of-state. So far this year, he has spent four days out of every 10 somewhere other than in Louisiana, which is about the same rate he was gone in 2014, according to the records of lieutenant governor, who by law is supposed to take over when the governor leaves the state. The governor’s office has stopped issuing press releases alerting the public when Jindal is gone. But just like before the announcement, Louisiana taxpayers are paying the salaries and expenses of the State Police troopers who provide security for him, which includes renting and driving the black Suburbans in which Jindal travels. The governor’s aides send the lieutenant governor a notice when Jindal leaves the state, as required by law, but otherwise there is no coordination or communication with Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne, who is technically in charge. “The governor is chief executive at all times,” Jindal’s Communications Director Mike Reed said. Though it may not look good, computers and cellphones make it a lot easier for an absent chief executive to keep abreast of the issues and make decisions, former Gov. Mike Foster said in an interview last week. “I don’t really see it as a big deal. It’s something somebody can gripe about. Whether it hurts your efficiency, I doubt that,” said Foster, who was criticized in his day for not traveling very much. Short of a something like a hurricane or the Mississippi River flooding, Foster said, Jindal’s presence in Baton Rouge isn’t necessary. “I’m sure if there’s a hurricane he would be back here. I would be surprised if he weren’t,” Foster said. “You know when they are coming, and you have time to get back.” But maybe the timing for a presidential run is a little off, said former Gov. Buddy Roemer, who ran for president in 2012. “He can do that. That is fun,” Roemer said of Jindal’s presidential bid. “But his responsibility is governor. And for that he should stay with the job or quit. Let the lieutenant governor do it. I want to make that point. I don’t mind Bobby running for president, just not as governor.” Similarly, former Gov. Kathleen Blanco criticized Jindal’s divided attention. “I don’t know how a governor can take off so much time from his job, but my experience was different,” she said. Her last six months in office were wall-to-wall work as Louisiana recovered from the 2005 hurricanes. Usually her trips out of state were to Washington, D.C., to argue with congressmen and federal officials about the conditions and requirements of loans and grants needed to rebuild flooded homes, damaged schools and weakened levees. Seventy-three-year-old state Sen. Francis Thompson, who just finished his 40th legislative session and has seen five other governors wind down their administrations, said all the state’s chief executives have their own styles. Some are more hands-on; others, like Jindal, delegate authority and responsibilities. But all governors rely on their staffs to keep an even keel, particularly during the final days of their tenure. “It’s so critical that the staff stays engaged,” said Thompson, D-Delhi. “They still have a role to play. Capital outlay goes nowhere without them. We still have a number of lawsuits. We are still fooling with BP,” the British oil giant responsible for the historic crude oil release in the Gulf of Mexico after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon accident. Though a state government budget crisis — lawmakers had to fill a $1.6 billion deficit — was averted this year, the solutions are precarious. Its balance could be upset by any number of factors, such as another drop in oil prices or a lack of confidence in the state by credit rating agencies or the success of a lawsuit, like the one filed last week by the Louisiana Chemical Association, challenging the constitutionality of one of the revenue-raising rollbacks in tax breaks that impact businesses. But short of a calamity like that, being in Baton Rouge is not that necessary, said Terry Ryder, who was Blanco’s executive counsel and Foster’s deputy chief of staff. “He’s got staff in Baton Rouge that can handle it and, as needed, consult him by cellphone. There’s the signature machine (to sign documents),” said Ryder, now a Baton Rouge lawyer. Jindal receives a binder every morning with briefing materials about what is going on that day. He usually reaches out by breakfast with questions, said his chief of staff, Melissa Mann. The governor calls throughout the day to walk through the questions and issue directives. “My job is to keep everything running on time. If legislators have issues, I help them sort through them,” Mann said June 26 at the end of her first week on the job. “If the cabinet brings up issues that rise to the level of the governor’s attention, then we have additional conferences on the phone.” An Oak Grove native who joined the administration in 2008 after graduating from LSU, Mann got the fourth-floor corner office on June 19 after Jindal’s fourth chief of staff, Kyle Plotkin, joined the presidential campaign team. “We have a pretty good idea of when the governor needs to be briefed on something, when it rises to his level and when we need input and decisions,” Mann said. “We understand the positions and the policies. We’ve been doing this for seven and a half years, so there’s going to be some hard guardrails we understand.” Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols is Jindal’s chief budget adviser and is in charge of the day-to-day operations of the state government bureaucracy. Nothing much has changed for her. Over the years, she has met with Jindal regularly — daily during legislative sessions or weekly, depending on what’s going on. She contacts Jindal through the chief of staff. The rhythm Nichols and Jindal have developed over the years is in-depth briefings on issues like the budget, operations of state government, upcoming discussions with the Legislature, forecasting future finances and major contracts that are being considered, she said. “After having been with him for this length of time, I have a good feel of what really needs to be decided by him. But I certainly always brief him on issues that need to be brought to his attention,” Nichols said. “He’s always got his finger on the pulse of what’s going on here,” said Revenue Secretary Tim Barfield, who, like Nichols, has served in several jobs during the Jindal administration. “From the things I see in my department, I don’t see his physical presence necessary.” “We’ve finished our final legislative session. We are not going to be advancing a lot of new initiatives,” Mann said. “We’re going to be more overseeing that transition and ensuring that cabinet agencies are prepared for the transition period. ... We’re going to make sure we finish well.” *TRUMP* *Mitt Romney Criticizes Donald Trump for Comments on Mexican Immigrants <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/04/romney-criticizes-trump-for-remarks-on-mexican-immigrants/?module=BlogPost-Title&version=Blog%20Main&contentCollection=Politics&action=Click&pgtype=Blogs®ion=Body> // NYT // Maggie Haberman – July 4, 2015* Mitt Romney criticized the real-estate mogul and presidential candidate Donald Trump on Saturday, saying he was damaging the Republican Party with his comments linking Mexican immigrants to crime. Mr. Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, spoke at a Fourth of July parade in Wolfeboro, N.H., where he owns a home. He was asked whether Mr. Trump’s comments depicting Mexican immigrants as violent predators had hurt a party that has been trying to make inroads with Hispanics. “Yes,” he replied, in remarks reported by CNN. “I think he made a severe error in saying what he did about Mexican-Americans.” Some of Mr. Trump’s Republican rivals, like Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, former governors Jeb Bush of Florida and George E. Pataki of New York, have also taken issue with his comments. And the Democratic candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton has been alluding to the comments in trying to portray the Republican field as a whole as anti-immigrant. *NASCAR is the latest brand to dump Donald Trump <http://nypost.com/2015/07/04/nascar-is-the-latest-brand-to-dump-donald-trump/> // AP // July 4, 2015* DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. — NASCAR is the latest corporation to distance itself from Donald Trump. On the same day one of its top sponsors called on NASCAR to take a stance against Trump, the motorsports series said it will not hold its season-ending awards ceremony at the Trump National Doral Miami. “We looked at everything we saw coming down and what we heard from our sponsors and our partners and what we feel we should be doing, and that’s what led us to the decision today,” NASCAR spokesman David Higdon said Friday at Daytona International Speedway. A message seeking comment from Trump left by The Associated Press was not returned. Higdon was responding to a letter released by Camping World CEO Marcus Lemonis, whose company is the title sponsor of NASCAR’s Truck Series. Lemonis made it clear he would not attend or participate in the awards ceremony if it was held at a Trump property. The ceremony was held at Doral last year. “My company … has enjoyed a long running relationship with NASCAR as I believe the vision of our companies both embody family, respect, unity, comradery and diversity,” Lemonis wrote in a letter to NASCAR Chairman Brian France. “These sentiments are at the core of what our country stands for and will continue to embrace. … Due to recent and ongoing blatantly bigoted and racist comments from Donald Trump in regards to immigrants of the United States, I would like to inform you that I will not, nor will any representative of Camping World, participate or attend in the ceremonial event if it is held at any Trump property. “Our company will not stand to support any person or organization that associates with such beliefs and we feel strongly about distancing ourselves from any negative and discriminatory comments made against any gender, ethnicity, age group or so forth. I would hope that the entire NASCAR organization would agree with my sentiments.” NASCAR and Camping World are the latest to distance themselves from Trump following his inflammatory statements regarding immigrants from Mexico. NBC, which is one of NASCAR’s television broadcast partners, parted ways with Trump earlier this week. Higdon said NASCAR is looking for another place to hold its awards ceremony and plans to formally announce a location later this summer. *GOP worries about Donald Trump fallout <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/02/politics/donald-trump-republicans-latinos/index.html> // CNN // Chris Moody – July 4, 2015* Washington (CNN)Republicans seeking to broaden the party's appeal to Latino voters have a challenge: Donald Trump. The bombastic businessman, who is seeking the GOP presidential nomination, is leaving many Republicans worried about the fallout from his comments that immigrants from Latin America are "killers" and "rapists." "Donald Trump's comments are hurtful for the cause of Republicans who want to reach out not just to Latinos but across many different ethnic barriers," said Ben Domenech, founder of The Federalist, a conservative opinion website, who co-authored a 2012 guide for Republicans on Hispanic outreach. "The problem with those comments is made worse by the fact that people will continue to confuse Trump with a Republican, which he is not, as opposed to thinking of him as an entertainer, which he is." Since losing the 2012 presidential election, Republicans have emphasized efforts to bring Latino voters into the fold. As a whole, the rapidly-growing group supported President Barack Obama over Republican Mitt Romney 71% to 27%, according to the Pew Research Center. The Republican National Committee pledged to spend $10 million on minority outreach after the election and made some in-roads during last year's mid-term races 2014, Pew found. Trump, who is polling near the top of Republican presidential contenders, has already lost partnerships with companies including NBC and Macy's after his comments stirred a public uproar. Earlier this week, RNC chairman Reince Priebus, who initiated the party's multi-million outreach program called Trump's comments "not helpful," according to The Washington Post. Conservative groups unaffiliated with the official party that coordinate Latino outreach efforts are speaking out against Trump's characterization of immigrants. "He's just wrong on policy. Flat-out. It's unkind and it mischaracterizes the contributions of the entire immigrant community," said Daniel Garza, executive director of the Libre Initiative. "They've brought wealth to America and ingenuity and innovation. The fact that Donald Trump is wrong both on sentiment and policy has allowed the Latino left to pile on. And there's something valid about what they're saying, that this is wrong in both content, style and policy." Despite the outcry, Trump has refused to back down or walk back his remarks. "If you look at the statistics of people coming, you look at the statistics on rape, on crime, on everything coming in illegally into this country it's mind-boggling!" Trump told CNN's Don Lemon in an interview Wednesday. "Somebody's doing the raping, Don! I mean somebody's doing it! Who's doing the raping?" Meanwhile, Trump's fellow Republican presidential candidates have distanced themselves from Trump on immigration. Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who delivered a speech at the National Press Club in which he called on minority voters to give Republicans a chance to make their case, said: "I don't think Donald Trump's remarks reflect the Republican Party." And Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said last week that candidates "will be held accountable by the voters for what they say." "I can tell you what I believe, particularly about Mexican-Americans: they are a community that has contributed greatly to this country, they work extremely hard, they've been very productive citizens of our country, and I think that's true of many ethnic groups in this country," he said. *Trump stands by statements on Mexican illegal immigrants, surprised by backlash <http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/04/trump-stands-by-views-dangerous-mexican-illegal-immigrants-admits-surprised-by/> // Fox News – July 4, 2015* Republican presidential candidate and real estate mogul Donald Trump on Saturday stood by statements he made recently that too many illegal immigrants from Mexico are criminals but said he was surprised by the backlash and that his comments are causing financial concerns. “The crime is raging and it’s violent. And if you talk about it, it’s racist,” Trump told Fox News, three days after a purported illegal Mexican immigrant deported five previous times allegedly killed a woman in San Francisco. Trump first made his inflammatory remarks during his non-scripted, June 16 presidential announcement speech. “When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending the best,” he said during the announcement. “They're not sending you, they're sending people that have lots of problems and they're bringing those problems. They're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime. They're rapists and some, I assume, are good people, but I speak to border guards and they're telling us what we're getting." Since then, a list of businesses have announced plans to cut ties with Trump’s vast business empire, while fellow Republican candidates and others have questioned Trump’s remarks. NBC and Univision, for example, have decided not to air the Trump-owned Miss Universe Pageant, Macy’s is dropping his signature clothing line, New York Democratic Mayor Bill de Blasio has ordered a review of Trump's city contracts and NASCAR is moving an annual banquet from the Trump National Doral resort in Miami. “I didn’t know it was going to be this severe,” Trump said Saturday, adding that he was surprised by the NASCAR decision, considering he has a good relationship with the group. “I am a whipping post.” Still, Trump has drawn support from Americans who say he is openly confronting the severity of the immigration problem that others won’t publicly knowledge. Trump also said Saturday that the problem isn’t limited to Mexico, that everybody entering the United States is not criminal or problematic and that his concerns are rooted in national security. “It’s about safety,” he said. “Some of the people coming here are very violent people, not all.” Trump and fellow GOP White House candidate and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio have publicly exchanged remarks since Trump’s presidential announcement, with Rubio saying Trump’s comments about Mexicans were “offensive, inaccurate and divisive.” After Mexican illegal immigrant Francisco Sanchez apparently killed 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle in San Francisco in a random attack Wednesday, Trump, who has proposed build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border, sent a direct tweet to Rubio, the son of Cuban parents who has made immigration reform a part of his presidential campaign. “What do you say to the family of Kathryn Steinle in CA who was viciously killed b/c we can’t secure our border? Stand up for US,” Trump tweeted. Federal officials said local authorities repeatedly released Sanchez, who was in their custody as recently as this spring. On Saturday, Trump said Rubio was “weak on immigration” and that fellow GOP White House candidate and former Texas Gov. Rick Perry “could have done a lot more.” He praised what he considers fellow candidate and Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz’s tough immigration stance, calling him “very brave.” *Trump comes up top in 'poll of polls' of Republican voters - despite growing backlash over his anti-immigrant comments <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3149611/Donald-Trump-polls-Republicans-defends-comments-immigration-despite-increasing-opposition-Mitt-Romney-saying-remarks-hurt-GOP.html> // Daily Mail // Christopher Brennan – July 4, 2015* Donald Trump continues to stand by controversial comments he made about Mexican immigrants as his standings in Republican primary polls improve despite increasing criticism. The presidential hopeful placed ahead of perceived front-runner Jeb Bush in a new aggregated 'poll of polls' with 13.6 per cent support compared to the former Florida governor's 13.3. The rise comes as public figures and businesses continue to admonish Trump because of the comments saying that those crossing the border from Mexico illegally were 'rapists'. Former Republican candidate Mitt Romney told CNN Saturday that the businessman 'made a severe error in saying what he did about Mexican-Americans'. Trump defended the remarks,and used an interview on Fox and Friends Saturday morning to take a dig at fellow presidential hopeful Marco Rubio. 'Rubio is weak on immigration,' Trump told Fox, while praising the stance of Tea Party favorite Ted Cruz. He linked policy at the southern US border to crimes, including the San Francisco shooting of 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle by a man who had been deported back to Mexico five times. 'The crime is raging and people don't want to talk about it. And if you talk about it you're a racist,' he said Saturday. Trump has continued to lose partnerships business after saying in his presidential announcement that migrants from Mexico are 'bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists. And some I assume are good people'. On Saturday NASCAR decided not to hold an event at one of his hotel's in Miami. Univision and NBC have cut ties with his Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants after outrage among Hispanic and Latino groups. 'I'm a little surprised at NASCAR to be honest', Trump said. While Trump's polling numbers have risen beyond Jeb Bush's, Romney, whose father was born in Mexico, replied that the comments have hurt the Republican party. He replied 'yes' when asked about the matter, according to CNN. Former New York Governor and Republican candidate George Pataki, who Trump criticized for not doing well in the polls, sent an open letter to those in his party to denounce the Apprentice host. Some presidential candidates such as Bush have been keen to court the Hispanic vote, speaking Spanish on prominent television appearances and during his announcement speech in a bid to make inroads to the crucial 2016 demographic. Trump has repeatedly said that he love Mexico despite many saying that his 'rapists' comments were racist against people from the country. The candidate said that he was being targeted 'from all sides' because he is successful. He denied that the ordeal was helping him by making him more recognizable. 'This is not good for my brand, I think it's bad for my brand. Maybe I'm leading in polls, but this is certainly not good. I lose customers, lose people,' he said. Romney, who spoke at a New Hampshire event he attended with New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and Florida Senator Marco Rubio, refused to say who he is endorsing for the Republican nomination, adding that his decision will come later. *Republicans cast into turmoil as Donald Trump rides the populist surge <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/republicans/11718563/Republicans-cast-into-turmoil-as-Donald-Trump-rides-the-populist-surge.html> // Telegraph // Philip Sherwell – July 5, 2015* For Donald Trump the entrepreneur, it was a damaging week. Two major television networks severed ties, Macy’s dropped his clothing line and Carlos Slim, the even richer Mexican tycoon, ended a joint venture with him. But for Donald Trump the inveterate showman and Republican challenger for president, the week was a triumph as he climbed in the opinion polls and dominated media coverage, despite the backlash against his decision to condemn Mexican immigrants as rapists and drug traffickers. “Wow, Huffington Post just stated that I am number one in the polls of Republican candidates,” the brash billionaire bragged as the week closed, citing the liberal media outlet that has been a platform for many of the strongest attacks on him. “Thank you, but the work has just begun!” Mr Trump was touting his first place in an average of 105 polls. Of the 14 candidates who have declared, Trump topped the field with 13.6 per cent support to 13.3 per cent for Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor and son and brother of two past presidents. The property mogul, reality television star and beauty pageant owner with the most flamboyant comb-over in public life may seem like a caricature and a political joke. But the Republican hierarchy is not laughing as he rides an anti-establishment populist tide, shooting from the hip with his overheated rhetoric. They are concerned not because they think he has a chance of securing the nomination but because they fear he could influence the election by scarring the party’s reputation. “Donald Trump is like watching a roadside accident,” Ari Fleischer, a former spokesman for George W Bush, told Politico. “Everybody pulls over to see the mess. And Trump thinks that’s entertainment. But running for president is serious. And the risk for the party is that he tarnishes everybody.” Mr Fleischer was a co-author of the party’s post-mortem into the 2012 presidential election defeat. That soul-searching concluded that the Republicans needed to broaden their appeal to younger voters, women and crucially the demographic of Hispanics. Mr Fleischer’s old boss won 40 per cent of the Latino vote in 2004. Mitt Romney took just 27 per cent eight years later. The party fears efforts to reverse that trend will be set back by Mr Trump’s comments, especially if his poll rating secures him a place at the first televised debate next month. “There’s a danger that Trump will crowd out our message with his antics,” a senior Romney financial donor who is considering his 2016 options said. “At first we all just thought he would crash and burn, but now the problem is who he takes down with him.” Mr Trump has long revelled in controversy and was a champion of the “birther movement” that questioned whether Barack Obama was born in America. But it was his comments about Mexican immigrants when he declared his candidacy that have dominated attention. “Mexico is sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with them,” he said. “They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.” And then he added as an afterthought: “And some, I assume, are good people.” His solution is to build a wall along the border and make Mexico pay for it. Mr Trump’s rivals in the race were at first unsure how to respond. Marco Rubio, the Florida senator and son of Cuban immigrants, finally on Thursday called the comments “not just offensive and inaccurate, but also divisive”. Jeb Bush, whose wife is Mexican and who delivered his declaration speech in English and Spanish and supports creating a path for legalising the status of undocumented immigrants, said: “His remarks do not represent the values of the Republican party and they do not represent my values.” Univision, the largest Spanish-language network in the US, and NBC said they were dropping their broadcasts of the Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants, which Mr Trump co-owns, while Macy’s axed his line of suits and ties. The latest to distance itself from Mr Trump is Nascar, the motor racing body, which said it would no longer use one of his hotels for its end-of-season awards. Speaking to Fox News yesterday, Mr Trump, 69, said he was surprised by Nascar’s decision and at the strength of the backlash. “I knew it was going to be bad because all my life I have been told: if you are successful you don’t run for office,” he said. “I didn’t know it was going to be this severe.” But he defended his stance and said he had become a “whipping post” for speaking up on immigration and crime.The lone fellow candidate to speak up for Mr Trump was Ted Cruz, the Texas senator whose father is Cuban, saying he “speaks the truth”. This is what attracts grassroots supporters such as Ken Crow, a leader of the Tea Party in the first-voting caucus of Iowa. He reeled off a list of reasons why he was backing Mr Trump. “Americans are sick and tired of corrupt government and career politicians,” he said. “He will straighten out the economy and defend our borders. Americans want a John Wayne right now, someone who’ll be a champion of our country.” The Trump candidacy is playing up strains between Tea Party activists and senior party figures, with Mr Fleischer adding that his comments were irresponsible and “hurtful”. And John Weaver, an adviser on John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign, noted: “I remember growing up in Kermit [Texas], every time the carnival came to town it drew a big crowd. But nobody wanted the carnival barker to be mayor.” *Donald Trump Immigration: Panama Leaves Miss Universe Pageant, Protesting Offensive Comments About Mexicans <http://www.ibtimes.com/donald-trump-immigration-panama-leaves-miss-universe-pageant-protesting-offensive-1995918> // International Business Times // Elizabeth Whitman – July 4, 2015* Add Panama to the growing list of Latin American nations refusing to participate in this year's Miss Universe pageant, a contest partially owned by 2016 presidential candidate Donald Trump, after the business tycoon generated global backlash with disparaging remarks about Mexicans immigrating to the United States. “They are bringing drugs. They are bringing crime. They’re rapists,” Trump said in June, referring to Mexican immigrants. “Some, I assume, are good people,” he added. He also suggested building a wall between the United States and Mexico. Protesting these words, Panama's Miss Panama Organization and its Telemetro television channel announced they would neither participate in nor broadcast this year's contest, the Associated Press reported Saturday. The entities described their decision as "a message of solidarity" to Mexicans. With this move, Panama joins a growing chorus of voices from the Latin American community blasting Trump's remarks as offensive and ignorant. Colombian Paulina Vega, the reigning Miss Universe, condemned Trump's comments in an Instagram post Thursday as "unjust and hurtful." Organizers in Costa Rica and Mexico have also withdrawn from this year's contest. "We reject the xenophobic and offensive statements by the owner of the Miss Universe pageant against our Mexican brothers and sisters, and therefore, against all Latin Americans," Teletica, the television network that organizes Miss Costa Rica, said Wednesday in a statement. Teletica added it would not broadcast the annual pageant. "We will only reconsider our decision if Donald Trump retracts his comments immediately and apologizes for his inadmissible statements, or if he separates himself completely from the organization of the pageant," it said. Miss Universe is a beauty pageant that began in 1973. It is part of the Miss Universe Organization, a venture jointly owned by Donald Trump and NBCUniversal that includes Miss USA and Miss Teen USA, according to its corporate website. The organization "uses its global grassroots reach to empower women to be self-confident and strive to be their personal best." *Fox Panelist Rips Trump: ‘Negotiate with Mexico? He Can’t Even Negotiate with Macy’s!’ <http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-panelist-rips-trump-negotiate-with-mexico-he-cant-even-negotiate-with-macys/> // Mediaite // Josh Feldman - July 4, 2015* Donald Trump‘s presidential campaign has given conservatives and Republicans lots of mixed feelings. But Fox’s Eric Bolling, at least, continues to be one of Trump’s biggest cable news defenders. On today’s Cashin’ In Panelist Jonathan Hoenig, however, wasn’t quite on board. He told Bolling, “He’s not just a fool, but he’s a fraud… Negotiate with Mexico? He can’t even negotiate with Macy’s!” And quite frankly, Bolling was the only one really defending Trump. Wayne Rogers said “if Trump can’t survive in the free market, that’s his problem,” while Michelle Fields said she’s not a Trump fan and that NBC probably did the right thing (even if they hypocritically embrace Al Sharpton and Brian Williams). Bolling still defended Trump, arguing that he’s bringing “fresh new ideas” and is someone willing to stand up for America. Rogers pointed out that there are other candidates who fit that description already, while Hoenig made it abundantly clear he just really doesn’t like Trump. Presidents, he said, don’t make over-the-top threats and don’t “alienate America’s major corporations.” Hoenig pointed out how Trump used to be a Democrat, and when Bolling talked about getting someone with a different kind of track record in the White House, Hoenig said, “Trump’s got a record of bankruptcy.” *Donald Trump's contracts with the city protected under the First Amendment, civil liberties lawyer says <http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/trump-contracts-city-protected-free-speech-article-1.2281636> // New York Daily News // Erin Durkin & Celeste Katz – July 4, 2015* Donald Trump’s city contracts might be saved by something his billions can’t buy: Free speech. City politicians eager to dump the GOP presidential candidate over his recent anti-Mexican rant are likely to find their efforts thwarted by the First Amendment, according to a leading civil liberties lawyer. While Macy’s, Univision and NBC all cut ties with The Donald in recent days, nixing his deals with the city would not be as fast or easy, according to both Trump and experts. Mayor de Blasio already promised a review of Trump’s contracts, including his sweet deal to operate New York’s newest golf course — a $230 million Bronx layout. And City Councilman Mark Levine called on the Parks Department to immediately use the “out” clauses in its contracts to cut ties with Trump over his “despicable” comments. Other Trump-operated city attractions include the Wollman and Lasker skating rinks, along with the Central Park carousel. “Our parks are public spaces where everyone should feel welcome, and an association with Mr. Trump directly contradicts this spirit,” said Levine, whose district includes Upper West Side and Harlem. “The Parks Department should exercise this option to sever all ties with Mr. Trump immediately.” But don’t cancel those Trump tee times just yet. While Trump’s comments during his presidential kickoff speech about Mexico importing “rapists” to the U.S. caused a furor, the odds on voiding any of his city contracts are longer than a 900-yard par five. “They can’t do that,” said prominent civil rights lawyer Norman Siegel. “There’s a thing called the First Amendment, and the city of New York can’t cancel a binding contract because they don't like the political views of Donald Trump.” Ron Lieberman, an executive vice president in the Trump Organization, echoed the attorney. “Our position is clear on that: There’s nothing to be reviewed,” said Lieberman. “They don’t have the constitutional right to put these contracts in play. “They’re binding contracts. There’s all sorts of rights and provisions — and millions and millions of dollars that would have to be paid back to us. It would be an incredible mistake.” The contract for the Ferry Park golf course, provided by City Controller Scott Stringer’s office, specifies the agreement between Trump and Parks “is terminable at will by the Commissioner in his sole absolute discretion, at any time.” There’s a caveat: “Such termination shall not be arbitrary or capricious.” The Parks Department punted Daily News inquiries about Trump to City Hall, and the Law Department declined to comment. Siegel, former head of the New York Civil Liberties Union, agreed Trump's comments were “offensive and wrong-minded.” But he warned it would “set a terrible precedent” to penalize Trump for expressing his opinion. It’s easy to see why Trump would want to stay the (golf) course. He's got a contract to run the nearly 200-acre site next to the Whitestone Bridge — a former landfill with Manhattan skyline views — while charging far more per person per round than other courses operating on city land. City residents pay $169 for 18 holes on weekends, while nonresidents pay $215. Under a deal struck during the Bloomberg Administration, the city footed the approximately $230 million bill for the construction of the course - and, as The News has reported, taxpayers could have to shell out as much as $300,000 a year for the massive amount of water needed to maintain the greens. *Trump Says Comments on Mexicans Have Hurt Business <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-04/trump-says-comments-on-mexicans-have-hurt-business> // Bloomberg // Ben Brody – July 4, 2015* Donald Trump admits that racially charged comments he made while announcing a run for the White House have hurt his business interests. And he swears he doesn't care. "For the people that say I’m doing it for my brand -- this isn’t good for my brand," the real estate mogul and Republican candidate said Saturday on Fox & Friends. "I think it’s bad for my brand. I don’t care. You know maybe I’m leading in polls, but this is certainly not good. I lose customers. I lose people." Trump, who nonetheless described his ongoing operations as "very powerful, very strong" during the interview, shrugged off the defection of multiple high-profile business and media partners over his characterization of Mexican immigrants as violent criminals and "rapists." "I’ve always said if you’re a successful person, it’s very hard to run for office, because they come at you at all different sides," Trump said. Macy's, Serta mattresses, Univision, NASCAR, and NBC, which carried his TV show The Apprentice, have all terminated agreements with Trump in recent days over the assertion, made on June 16 during Trump's announcement of a presidential run, that Mexico is "sending people that have lots of problems... They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists." New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said the city would review contracts it has with the mogul, and his rivals in both parties have also condemned his comments. Still, Trump's recent surge in the polls has suggested the some voters don't mind the rhetoric. Some may even warm to it. In the Saturday interview, Trump continued to defend the comments. "The crime is raging — it’s raging — and it’s violent," he said. "People don’t even want to talk about it, and if you talk about it, you’re a racist. I don’t understand it." *UNDECLARED* *WALKER* *Walker to drop open records restrictions in Wisconsin <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/246877-walker-to-drop-open-records-restrictions-in-wisconsin> // The Hill // Mark Hensch – July 4, 2015* Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) said his state is jettisoning part of its proposed budget that would eliminate many opens records laws. Walker announced the move late Saturday alongside State Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R), Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R) and the co-chairs of the state’s joint budget committee. “[The proposal] will be removed from the budget entirely,” they said in a statement, according to The Associated Press. “[It] was never intended to inhibit transparency in government in any way,” they added. AP said the budget language would have exempted nearly anything created by Wisconsin government officials from the state’s open records law. Republicans added the details into the proposed budget late Thursday evening. The Wisconsin legislature is now forming a committee to research the transparency issue and publicly discuss possible solutions. Walker is reportedly formally launching his 2016 GOP presidential bid July 13 after the completion of his state budget. A RealClearPolitics average of recent polls shows him second only to former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush among potential Republican voters. He also has a commanding lead in recent sampling of Iowa caucus voters. *To Celebrate the Fourth, Scott Walker's GOP Declares Secrecy <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-bottari/to-celebarate-the-fourth_b_7726644.html> // HuffPo // Mary Bottari – July 4, 2015* America fought a revolution against secret and unaccountable government, but this Fourth of July Scott Walker and the Wisconsin GOP are planning on gutting Wisconsin's open records law, the strongest in the nation. On the same day that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker announced his run for president, the Wisconsin GOP has proposed a virtual gutting of Wisconsin's open records law, long considered one of the best in the nation. The drastic changes were proposed in a last-minute, anonymous budget motion, with zero public input on the eve of a holiday weekend. The motion will be rolled into the state's massive budget bill and voted on in the coming weeks. The unprecedented proposal would give lawmakers broad authority to hide the special interests who are working to influence legislation. It would keep legislative drafting files under wraps, create a new "deliberative materials" exemption in the open records law that would exempt records at all levels of government, and give the legislature an easy way to hide even more records from disclosure in the future. The move to gut the open records law appears to come in direct response to a lawsuit that the Center for Media and Democracy filed against Governor Walker in May. State Rep. Gordon Hintz, a democrat from Oshkosh on the Joint Finance Committee, tweeted that GOP budget leaders made it clear to the committee that Walker had signed off on the changes, including the changes to the open records law. CMD was the first to reveal that Walker's office had struck the "search for truth" from the university's mission and eliminated the "Wisconsin Idea," and sued Walker after he withheld records pertaining to the changes, based on a claimed "deliberative process privilege." Although Walker's lawyers claim there already exists a deliberative privilege in Wisconsin law, that clearly is not true, because if it were, his allies in the legislature wouldn't have to add one through the budget process. The sweeping proposal would gut the public records law as it applies to the legislature and governor's office, hiding special interest influence over public policy. The measure would help candidate Walker sidestep public scrutiny as more and more national media outlets file records requests with his office. The Joint Finance Committee chairs, Sen. Alberta Darling (R) and Rep. John Nygren (R), have refused to say who asked for the changes. Bill Lueders, president of the transparency watchdog Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, called the proposal a "cowardly" and a "shocking assault on the state's long and proud tradition of open government." "These radical and sweeping changes represent a full-frontal attack on Wisconsin's history of open government," Lueders said. "They are clearly intended to block the public from discovering what factors drive the official actions of government, especially the Legislature, and will inevitably lead to abuse, malfeasance and corruption." Ron Sklansky, a former 35-year senior staff attorney at the nonpartisan Wisconsin Legislative Counsel and an experts on open records, told CMD he had never seen a legislative proposal put forward that was as "devastating" to the open records law as this one. The measure is "almost a complete gutting of open records as it applies to the legislative and executive branch. It prevents the public from investigating the undue influence of special interests on the passage of legislation and the development of executive branch proposals and rule making," he said. Although the proposal passed the Joint Finance Committee along party lines--with all Republicans voting in favor and all Democrats against--the move has prompted outrage across the political spectrum. The president of the right-wing MacIver Institute, Brett Healy, said the proposal "looks to be a huge step backwards for open government." Wisconsin's Republican Attorney General, Brad Schimel, said "Transparency is the cornerstone of democracy and the provisions in the Budget Bill limiting access to public records move Wisconsin in the wrong direction." Hours later, Walker's spokesperson promised vaguely that the governor would work with the legislature to address the issue. Critically, some legislators are saying they will not vote for the controversial budget with the changes included. "I will not support a budget that includes this assault on democracy," GOP Senator Robert Cowles said. And other GOP Reps. expressed discomfort and surprise with the move. The proposal would: 1) Create a new "deliberative materials" exemption The amendments would exempt all "deliberative materials" from disclosure under the public records law, protecting anything that might have informed a policy decision. "Deliberative materials" are broadly defined as "communications and other materials, including opinions, analyses, briefings, background information, recommendations, suggestions, drafts, correspondence about drafts, and notes, created or prepared in the process of reaching a decision concerning a policy or course of action." This measure could protect the disclosure of communications, draft legislation, or background materials from groups like the American Legislative Exchange Council, or "ALEC." It would allow legislators to hide their communications with lobbyists or campaign donors seeking policy favors. And it would allow the governor to hide how the executive budget was developed--including, for example, how, and why, his office might have sought to alter the purpose of the university system. 2) Allow legislators to hide the identify of any person who communicates about the development of policy This could allow lawmakers to hide the special interests who are working to influence legislation. For example, CMD has filed an open records request with Joint Finance Chair Alberta Darling, who received thousands of dollars of contributions from Bill Minahan, whose company Building Committee Inc. received a $500,000 unsecured loan from the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (WEDC), then promptly went bust leaving taxpayers to foot the bill. The Wisconsin State Journall used the open records law to take a deep dive into this loan, documenting that it came shortly after Minahan gave Walker a $10,000 contribution and linking it to Walker's chief of staff Keith Gilkes and second-in-command Mike Huebsch. Most recently, the State Journal discovered that Minahan loan had not gone through the underwriting required by law and many more loans failed to go through proper underwriting, putting millions of taxpayer dollars at risk. WEDC has been the subject of two damning state audits which documented continued lawbreaking at Walker's flagship jobs agency. Shortly after the last audit was published, two legislators threatened to get rid of the highly respected non-partisan audit bureau. CMD sent records requests to Reps. Adam Jarchow and David Craig, curious as to who was behind the radical move to destroy the audit bureau, but has not yet received their response. 3) Hide the "drafting files" showing how legislation is developed "Drafting files" reveal the process of developing a bill or budget provision, and are used regularly by journalists to gain insight into how policy is developed. And those insights can sometimes be embarrassing. Drafting files were key to undermining Walker's claims about his offices changes to the Wisconsin Idea. After the deletion of the "search for truth" sparked a "political firestorm" in Wisconsin and around the country, the governor blamed the change on a "drafting error," and then on a "miscommunication," then claimed that the university never raised concerns about the changes. Yet those statements were contradicted by the drafting files examined by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, and documents obtained through records requests, earning Walker a "pants on fire" rating from Politifact. Drafting files also informed other important investigations. In 2014, for example, a Wisconsin State Journal examination of drafting files showed a wealthy, divorced donor to Rep. Joel Kleefisch helping to write a bill that would have lowered his child support payments. If these amendments were enacted, those records--and the donor's influence--would have been kept secret. Additionally, drafting records aren't just important for accountability, "they are needed by the courts to discern the legislative intent behind the construction of statutes," said Sklansky who noted that legislative intent was a consideration in the recent Supreme Courts ruling on the federal health care law last week. Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David Prosser, for example, a former Republican legislator, regularly consults drafting files and legislative records to ascertain legislative intent. 4) Allow the legislature to override the Public Records Law via legislative rule The proposal also gives the legislature the ability to exempt any additional records from disclosure merely by adopting a new rule by majority vote--without having to go through the legislative process. By eliminating access to records that had previously been public, this move limits the ability of the press and public to play their watchdog role. Taken together with proposals to dismantle the nonpartisan Government Accountability Board (after it investigated alleged campaign finance violations by Walker's campaign) and the nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau (after it critiqued Walker's jobs agency in a scathing audit), all evidence indicates that Governor Walker and his allies are seeking to muzzle the watchdogs. *Scott Walker, Republican leaders remove open records restrictions from Wisconsin budget <http://host.madison.com/news/local/writers/jason-joyce/scott-walker-republican-leaders-remove-open-records-restrictions-from-wisconsin/article_ef208316-2293-11e5-965f-3373d5034dd2.html#ixzz3f0It78Hp> // The Capital Times // Jason Joyce – July 4, 2015* It appears Wisconsin's tradition of open records and transparent government may be safe — for the weekend, at least. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, along with the co-chairs of the Legislature's Joint Finance committee, Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald and Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, all Republicans, responded to substantial pushback over a measure that would severely limit access to legislative records with a Saturday afternoon statement, saying "the provisions relating to any changes in the state's open records law will be removed from the budget in its entirety." The Joint Finance Committee, controlled like both houses of the Legislature by Republicans, passed the measure on a party line vote late Thursday as part of "Motion #999," which often includes last-minute wishlist items, non-fiscal policy and nods to special interests. "We are steadfastly committed to open and accountable government," read the statement. "The intended policy goal of these changes was to provide a reasonable solution to protect constituents' privacy and to encourage a deliberative process between elected officials and their staff in developing policy. It was never intended to inhibit transparent government in any way." Republicans have avoided identifying who is behind the proposal, but Rep. Gordon Hintz, D-Oshkosh, a member of the JFC, tweeted Friday that his Republican colleagues on the panel assured him that Walker had gone over the motion, signing off on "motions including open records changes after crossing out what he'd veto." The statement also says a Legislative Council committee will be formed to examine the issue of records access more closely and outside the budget deliberation process. Speaking with reporters Saturday morning, Walker made no mention of any plans to address the issue this weekend, insisting that he planned to wait until a Monday meeting with legislative leaders to iron out an issue that was met by sharp criticism from all sides over the past two days. He also avoided answering questions about his role in crafting and proposing the measure. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel posted a brief video of Walker's meeting with reporters. The governor, who will announce he's running for president in Waukesha on July 13, was first asked if his office had any input on the proposal. "As I mentioned yesterday, we’re going to sit down and talk to the legislative leaders about that. We had already planned a follow-up meeting the other day in terms of the arena where we had all four legislative leaders," Walker said. "I think it’s pretty clear they need to make some changes on that and we’re going to work with them on it Monday." Walker was then asked if he planned to veto the measure from the final budget if it cleared the Assembly and Senate. "Certainly it will all depend. We haven’t made commitments on any other vetoes, but those are things obviously a lot of concerns about. My hope is, after talking to them on Monday we get to a point where it’s either out completely or there are significant changes to it," Walker said. "Again, as you know at the end of the legislative processs, there’s a lot of things the legislative leadership works on and for us, there’s other things in there. We’ll review it and we’ll see what passes not just the Joint Finance Committee, but what gets through the Assembly and the Senate." Finally, Walker was asked if he was aware of the proposal and if he objected to it. "Again, those are all things we’ll talk about on Monday. We’ll talk about what we’re going to do going forward. There’s always all sorts of ideas that float around the Capitol before the end of the Joint Finance Committee process, but I think it’s pretty clear that lawmakers from both parties, as well as others, want us to make changes and we’re going to make sure that happens starting with a meeting on Monday," Walker said. Walker went on to say it's "overall, a very positive budget" and called attention to property tax cuts. The proposal to limit access to legislative records, effective as of July 1, the first day of the state's fiscal year, was immediately greeted with criticism Thursday afternoon with legislators from both parties condemning it within 24 hours of its passage. The Capital Times and other media organizations have filed open records requests for documents related to the drafting of the measure, which could have been ignored had the proposal passed with the state budget and been signed into law by Walker. *Wisconsin Open Records Law: Gov Scott Walker, Likely 2016 Candidate, Backtracks On Attempts To Limit Public Access To Records <http://www.ibtimes.com/wisconsin-open-records-law-gov-scott-walker-likely-2016-candidate-backtracks-attempts-1995943> // International Business Times - Clark Mindock – July 4, 2015* Expected 2016 Republican presidential candidate and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker backtracked on legislation that would have restricted open records access amid harsh backlash from critics in the last two days, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported Saturday. The open records law was part of a broader state budget plan currently being considered. A joint finance committee for the state Senate and Assembly voted Thursday along party lines to advance a measure that included the open records restrictions. The same day, Walker filed a letter with the Federal Election Commission announcing he had met the formal qualifications to be considered a candidate for president. However, he said, he was not yet making an official announcement. The open records provisions would have exempted certain records from public scrutiny, including records from the Walker administration and draft legislation. “After substantive discussion over the last day, we have agreed that the provisions relating to any changes in the state's open records law will be removed from the budget in its entirety. We are steadfastly committed to open and accountable government," a joint statement from Walker and GOP lawmakers read, according to the Journal Sentinel. "The intended policy goal of these changes was to provide a reasonable solution to protect constituents' privacy and to encourage a deliberative process between elected officials and their staff in developing policy. It was never intended to inhibit transparent government in any way." The Wisconsin Legislature is expected to hold a series of votes next week. It will consider the budget, a 20-week abortion ban that makes no exception for rape or incest cases, major tax changes, public funding for a Milwaukee Bucks arena and possible changes to the prevailing wage for public workers, which establishes minimum wages for those workers. Walker is expected, according to several news outlets including CNN, to declare his presidential candidacy July 13 after the budget is finalized in the Legislature. He is entering as a favorite, and regularly polls in the lead or near the top of the large GOP field currently fighting for the party’s nomination. He is one of several current or former governors in the race. *Democrats underestimate Scott Walker at their own peril <http://www.burlingtoncountytimes.com/opinion/op-ed/democrats-underestimate-scott-walker-at-their-own-peril/article_cfcee729-2a2b-5761-a68f-3a928328a0b6.html> // Burlington County Times // Gene Lyons – July 5, 2015* Economically speaking, all 237 GOP presidential candidates are selling the same magic beans. Everybody knows the script. Tax cuts for wealthy “job creators” bring widespread prosperity. Top off Scrooge McDuck’s bullion pool, and the benefits flow outward to everybody else. The economy surges, budget deficits melt away, and the song of the turtledove will be heard in the land. Almost needless to say, these “supply side” miracles have never actually happened in the visible world. State budget debacles in Kansas and Louisiana only signify the latest failures of right-wing dogma. Hardly anybody peddling magic beans actually believes in them anymore. Nevertheless, feigning belief signifies tribal loyalty to the partisan Republicans who will choose the party’s nominee. However, with everybody in the field playing “let’s pretend,” a candidate needs another way to distinguish himself. I suspect that Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin may have found it. See, Walker won’t just put money back in “hardworking taxpayers’ “ pockets. Like a latter-day Richard Nixon, Walker will also stick it to people he doesn’t like: lollygagging schoolteachers; featherbedding union members; and smug, tenured college professors who think they’re smarter than everybody else. If he lacks charisma, there’s an edge of ruthlessness in Walker’s otherwise bland demeanor that hits GOP primary voters right where they live. No less an authority than Uncle Scrooge himself — i.e., David Koch of Koch Industries, who with his brother, Charles, has pledged to spend $900 million to elect a Republican in 2016 — told the New York Observer after a closed-door gathering at Manhattan’s Empire Club that Walker will win the nomination and crush Hillary Clinton in a general election “by a major margin.” Viewed from a distance, the determination of prosperous, well-educated Wisconsin to convert itself into an anti-union, right-to-work state like Alabama or Arkansas appears mystifying. To risk the standing of the University of Wisconsin system by abolishing academic tenure, as Walker intends, is damn near incomprehensible. Attack one of America’s great public research universities for the sake of humiliating (Democratic-leaning) professors over nickel-and-dime budgetary issues? Do Wisconsinites have no clue how modern economies work? Maybe not. But Walker’s supporters definitely appear to know who their enemies are, culturally speaking. Incredulity aside, it would be a mistake not to notice the craftiness with which he’s brought off the transformation. Not to mention that Walker has won three elections since 2010 in a blue state that hasn’t supported a Republican presidential nominee since Ronald Reagan. Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes don’t mean much by themselves, but throw in Michigan and Ohio, Midwestern states also trending similarly, and you’ve definitely got something. Act 10, the 2011 law that took away collective bargaining rights for many public employees in Wisconsin — except, at first, for police officers and firefighters — brought crowds of angry teachers (also mostly Democrats) to the state capitol in Madison for weeks of angry demonstrations. As much as MSNBC was thrilled, many Wisconsinites appear to have been irked. In the end, the state ended up saving roughly $3 billion by shifting the funding of fringe benefits such as health insurance and pensions from employer to employee, costing the average teacher roughly 16 percent of his or her compensation. Mindful of budget shortfalls, the unions had proposed negotiations, but that wasn’t enough for Walker. For the record, Act 10 was an almost verbatim copy of a bill promoted by the Arlington, Virginia-based American Legislative Exchange Council, a think tank largely funded by, you guessed it, the brothers Koch. Four years ago, a documentary filmmaker caught Walker on camera telling wealthy supporters that the new law was just the beginning. “The first step is, we’re going to deal with collective bargaining for all public employee unions,” he said, “because you use divide-and-conquer.” “If we can do it in Wisconsin, we can do it anywhere — even in our nation’s capital,” Walker wrote in his book, “Unintimidated,” noted Dan Kaufman in the New York Times Magazine. Elsewhere, Walker has boasted that, as president, he could take on foreign policy challenges, because “if I can take on 100,000 protesters, I can do the same across the world.” Ridiculous, of course, but it plays. Meanwhile, rueful trade unionists who endorsed Walker in 2010, because they never imagined that having vanquished the women’s union he’d come after the ironworkers and the electricians in their pickup trucks, are crying the blues. Divided, they’ve been conquered. So right-to-work it is: Salaries are already diminished, with job security, pensions, and health and safety regulations inevitably to follow. More bullion for Scrooge McDuck’s pool. So now it’s the professors’ turn. Walker, a Marquette dropout, has described his new law as “Act 10 for the university.” Tenure is a dead letter in cases of “financial emergency ... requiring program discontinuance, curtailment, modification or redirection.” So who gets redirected first? Left-wing culture warriors or climate scientists? Hint: Scrooge is a fierce climate-change denier. Meanwhile, Democrats underestimate Scott Walker at considerable peril. *Politics of immigration take root in Walker's hometown <http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/politics-of-immigration-take-root-in-walkers-hometown-b99522410z1-311662871.html> // Journal Sentinel // Mary Spicuzza – July 5, 2015* Delavan— A glimpse along the historic brick street at the heart of this small southeastern Wisconsin city hints at how completely Gov. Scott Walker's hometown has been transformed by immigration. Brightly colored cakes for coming-of-age celebrations, known as quinceañeras, and towering wedding cakes fill the windows at Cake Pastel Mexican bakery. A few steps away, La Guanajuato Mexican food store offers everything from a taqueria and butcher shop to calling cards and money transfer services. Just next door, piñatas fill the storefront of Dulceria Acapulco ice cream, coffee and candy shop. Delavan has been thrust into the national news recently as Walker talks about the values he learned as the son of a preacher during the nearly 10 years he spent here. But the Republican governor and likely presidential candidate also has been emphasizing get-tough policies on illegal, and even legal, immigration. He has compared securing the borders to responding to military attacks on our water ports and wants to bolster methods for making sure employers give jobs only to people here legally. In Wisconsin, Latinos account for 6% of the population, and the vast majority live in urban counties. But perhaps nowhere would Walker's proposals resonate more profoundly than in the people, economy and culture of his boyhood home. Almost 30% of Delavan's roughly 8,500 residents are Latino, and almost one-third of those Latinos are first-generation immigrants, according to the most recent U.S. Census Bureau estimates. The city this year hosted its 14th annual Cinco de Mayo Festival in May, and the entertainment lineup at the fall Heritage Fest features mariachi bands along with polka and swing. The Delavan-Darien School District, where Walker attended school from third grade until he graduated from high school in 1986, has a Latino student population of about 47%. A University of Wisconsin-Madison report released last year found Delavan-Darien had the highest proportion of Latino students of any school district in Wisconsin. Recent statistics from the state Department of Public Instruction show it's now essentially tied with Arcadia School District for that spot. "A lot of the higher-percentage districts were not in places that you would think of on the map as being Latino centers," said David Long, a UW-Madison researcher in the Applied Population Laboratory who co-authored the 2014 report on Wisconsin's Latino population. "It's pretty striking, and Delavan is a great example of that." Bilingual offerings Coming from the town of Plainfield, Iowa, with fewer than 500 people, Walker has said he saw Delavan as the "big city" when his family moved there in 1977. His father, Llew, took a job as the pastor at Delavan First Baptist Church, and the future governor remained here with his family until enrolling at Marquette University in 1986. The area's Latino population has grow exponentially since around that time. Only 7% in 1980, it climbed to 11% in 1990, then 21% in 2000 and nearly 30% in 2010. Many of Delavan's Latino families have members who initially moved here to work at farms in the area, and others have been drawn by the pull of family ties as increasing numbers of people stay throughout the year rather than traveling back to Mexico. In the Delavan-Darien district, classes, menus and services at the school district are offered in both Spanish and English. A recent end-of-the-year performance featured children singing the song "Five Little Monkeys" in English and Spanish ("Cinco Monitos"). Young children starting in kindergarten and first grade — English-speakers and Spanish-speakers, white and Latino students alike — alternate languages. Last school year the district launched a new two-way language immersion experiment, the Dual Language Education Program, where English- and Spanish-speaking students start 4-year-old kindergarten receiving 90% of instruction in Spanish and 10% in English. Each year, the proportion adjusts, so the split is 50/50 by third grade. "We've really made a push to try to do more things in a bilingual manner," said Mike Heine, a spokesman for the district. "Then kids are learning both languages side by side." Cynthia Bell-Jimenez, a dual-language kindergarten teacher at Turtle Creek Elementary School, said parents are encouraged to participate whether or not they speak English. "The parents are very involved, and we're making sure the parents are involved more," she said. "We are trying to make sure everybody feels part of the community." School officials praise the district's growing Latino population as an asset, saying its mission is to make sure students are prepared to "contribute as a 21st-century citizen by providing a real-world education that is engaging, thought-provoking and culturally diverse." But Delavan-Darien also faces problems common in districts with large numbers of immigrants. Poverty is high, and support for school referendums is hard to come by because residents don't want to approve higher taxes they can't afford. In that climate, holding onto staff has been hard, the superintendent says. At a time when the needs of Delavan schools are higher than ever, in part because of its diversity, its budget is being crunched tighter than ever. "Seventy percent of our students qualify for free (or) reduced lunch," Superintendent Robert Crist wrote in a recent letter to lawmakers. "We have over one hundred homeless students." Migrant workers The town's unofficial historian, Wallace Gordon Yadon, spoke about the evolution of the Latino community in a high school documentary project not long before he died in 2013. Yadon, who was born in Delavan in 1923 and lived there his whole life except when he was serving in the Navy during World War II, talked about seeing Latinos around town for the first time in about 1931. They picked produce like potatoes, carrots and cabbage, Yadon said. "It required an awful lot of hand cultivation, and the Latinos provided it," Yadon said in the film. "By today's standards, the pay seems ridiculously low. They got about $5 a day working 10-hour days." Yadon told those interviewing him that the immigrants lived in shacks with no electricity or running water and would typically stay from late spring to early fall. "It started out with a couple hundred laborers; as it expanded they would bring more with them," he said. "Several hundred on a seasonal basis, then after the war it steadily grew." He added that after WWII, some Latinos started staying rather than leaving after the growing season ended. "It wasn't a great movement overnight, but they trickled in," he said. "Most of them applied for citizenship, and that kind of was the embryonic start of our Latino population." Yadon, who served as Delavan's postmaster for years, said he remembers workers coming to the post office immediately after getting paid to send money back home. Yadon said many Latinos didn't "mix too well with the community" at first but have since "blended in very harmoniously." "They've been remarkable," Yadon said. "They're quite an asset to Delavan. So many of them have gone into business of their own and been highly successful." Complex issue What is left unspoken in all this is how much of that population is here illegally. Wisconsin is home to some 85,000 people who immigrated illegally, three-fourths of them from Mexico, a study released last year by the Pew Hispanic Center found. Much of Delavan's Latino population was born in the central Mexican state of Guanajuato. Money continues to be sent back home. Several local shop windows are lined with signs offering a variety of money transfer services that allow cash to be quickly wired directly to Mexico and other destinations. The issue of illegal immigration has long been politically volatile — and it will be critical to anyone seeking the GOP nomination in 2016. Although the party is divided on exactly what measures should be taken to tighten immigration laws, the consensus is that illegal immigrants should not be afforded the same benefits as those who came here legally. The party's base — which plays such a big role in primary season — is largely opposed to a path to citizenship, something Democrats generally support. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, for example, has faced intense criticism from some in the GOP base over his support for giving illegal immigrants a path to legal status. Walker's views on immigration have been something of a moving target. He has changed his mind from advocating a clear path to citizenship to opposing any form of amnesty, and has said illegal immigrants should return to their country of origin and essentially get in line to come back. He's recently suggested that legal immigration should be curbed as well. The governor frames his views as doing what's best for America's security, its workers and its jobs — a framework virtually any candidate would support. It's what fills in the picture that gets hard. How much should be spent securing the border? How would self-deportation work, and what's the fallout of breaking up families? What about employers who use illegal immigrant labor? With an estimated 11 million to 12 million undocumented immigrants in the country, that's where it gets difficult on both a philosophical and practical level. In Delavan, the complexity of the issue is evident. The mayor did not respond to requests to be interviewed on Walker and immigration policy. The city website has only the smallest hint that Latinos are a part of the community's identity, much less a significant part. AshLee Strong, a Walker political aide, said that he "has explained that we have limits on immigration now, they just don't make any sense." "His position on policies that are good for working families and wages are not inconsistent with policies that are good for immigrants here today and future immigrants. He is saying that we are a nation of immigrants, and as we look at fixing our broken immigration system — we need to make sure the policies are working as planned, which inherently means that they are beneficial for working families, wages and the strength of the U.S. economy," she said. Strong stressed Walker's opposition to President Barack Obama's 2014 executive action on immigration. "American citizenship is a distinct privilege and requires meeting a high threshold. Citizenship should be reserved for only those who follow the law and apply like everyone else," Strong said. "The next president is going to have to work with Congress to determine what future policies look like for the people here. This cannot be done outside of the law through executive order." Effects on Delavan Karen Cano, a 22-year-old high school Spanish teacher who was raised in Delavan, said Walker's recent immigration comments suggest he may be out-of-touch with his hometown. "It's always interesting to see that some people are so prideful that he's from here. But some of the people feel he's not accepting of certain populations — like the growing Latino community," Cano said. "I don't think he is thinking about how his proposals would affect his hometown. And I don't think he's accepting of how much it's changed." Cano was born in Whitewater but moved to Delavan when she was 4 years old because her parents, who were Mexican immigrants, wanted to be closer to the town's La Luz del Mundo church congregation. She graduated from Delavan-Darien High School and now teaches in nearby Milton. She added that Walker's proposals would hurt not only Latino students and families, but also Delavan's economy. "Just in downtown alone, there are so many Latino-owned businesses I can't even think of how many," Cano said. She added that some Latino families have illegal immigrants, legal immigrants (such as "green card" holders who have been granted authorization to live and work in the United States on a permanent basis) and citizens all living under one roof, and the idea of asking people who are in the country illegally to return to their country of origin would tear families apart. "It's just not logical," Cano said. Positive contributions Andy Sanchez is one of those illegal immigrants. Waiting for his lunch at the taqueria in back of La Guanajuato one recent day, he sits near a shrine to the Virgin of Guadalupe and a mural honoring Mexican revolutionary Emiliano Zapata. Sanchez said he was born in Mexico and came to the U.S. as a teenager. He has three children — a fourth died eight years ago — and seven grandchildren, all of whom are U.S. citizens. He says he spent years picking fruit before returning to his homeland to serve in the Mexican army. He now works as a machine operator in the food industry, Sanchez said. He's heard all the negatives — the talk of gang involvement, criminal behavior. But he said the positive contributions of Latinos who are in the country both legally and illegally far outweigh the negatives, and he wishes that would be more broadly embraced than any notion of deportation. "If we go, we go," he said. But he shakes his head at such talk. "Believe me, if we leave, this country is going down," he said. *KASICH* *For Ohio Gov. John Kasich, "Win with Jeb and John" has a nice -- even plausible – ring <http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/07/for_ohio_gov_john_kasich_win_w.html> // Cleveland // Thomas Suddes – July 5, 2015* Word seeped out last Sunday that Republican Gov. John Kasich would soon announce his bid for the presidency, demonstrating yet again that life is one coincidence after another. Exactly 71 years before last Sunday, in 1944, the Republican National Convention, meeting in Chicago, nominated Ohio's then-governor, John Bricker, for vice president. The GOP's pick for president: New York Gov. Thomas Dewey. The Dewey-Bricker ticket lost to Democratic President Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman. Still, Dewey, with Bricker's help, carried Ohio. And part of American politics' apostles' creed is that no Republican can reach the White House without carrying Ohio. Obviously, as Dewey demonstrated in 1944, and Richard Nixon did in 1960, a Republican can carry Ohio and not become president. Still, beginning in 1860 with Abraham Lincoln, every Republican elected president has carried Ohio. And John Kasich's record demonstrates he can carry Ohio. Kasich's formal announcement will come on July 21, at Ohio State University's Ohio Union. If you underestimate Kasich, your picture belongs in the dictionary next to the word "fool." The only elections Ohio State grad Kasich seems to have lost were 1972 and 1973 bids for president of OSU's undergraduate student government. (The 1972 winner: Future Cleveland Mayor Michael White.) But for public office, look at Kasich's trophies: * Unseat an incumbent Democratic state senator in 1978? Check. * Unseat an incumbent Democratic U.S. House member in 1982? Check. * Unseat an incumbent Democratic Ohio governor in 2010? Check. * And win re-election as governor in 2014 despite having enraged organized labor in 2011 with Senate Bill 5? Check. It's tough, at this writing, to imagine that Republicans won't nominate former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush for president at next year's Cleveland convention. And if Bush is the nominee, it's hard to imagine a more suitable running mate, politically, than John Kasich. True, Kasich's ... um ... spontaneity ... may make it hard for some bystanders to imagine him in the presidency or vice presidency. But compared with, say, Joe Biden, Kasich is an introvert. "We'll win with Tom and John in November," pumped-up Bricker backers shouted in 1944, when Ohio's Bricker landed the GOP's vice presidential nomination. Maybe, at next summer's Cleveland convention, Republicans will be shouting, "We'll win with Jeb and John." 2004 marriage tally Ohio voters banned same-sex marriage by amending the state constitution in 2004. And that year, the General Assembly passed Substitute House Bill 272, a statutory (as opposed to constitutional) ban on same-sex marriage. The House approved the bill 73-23; the Senate agreed, 18-15; and Gov. Bob Taft signed the measure on Feb. 6, 2004. Among legislators who voted against the 2004 statutory marriage ban were former Gov. Nancy Hollister of Marietta, the only House Republican with the courage to vote "no"; Rep. Fred Strahorn, a Dayton Democrat, now the House's minority leader; then-Sen. Dan Brady, a Cleveland Democrat, now Cuyahoga County Council president; then-Sen. David Goodman, a suburban Columbus Republican, now in Kasich's Cabinet as director of Development Services; then-Rep. Michael Skindell, a Lakewood Democrat now a state senator; and then-Sen. Steve Stivers, a suburban Columbus Republican now in Congress. Those weren't easy votes 11 years ago. But as the Supreme Court's June ruling showed, those votes defended human rights. Among Ohio House Republicans voting in 2004 to pass the same-sex marriage ban were then-Reps. Keith Faber of Celina, now the Senate's president; Jon Husted of suburban Dayton, now secretary of state; and Mary Taylor of suburban Akron, now Kasich's lieutenant governor. *Ohio education officials: Kasich vetoes likely mean less funding for some school districts <http://hudsonhubtimes.com/news%20local/2015/07/05/ohio-education-officials-kasich-vetoes-likely-mean-less-funding-for-some-school> // Hudson Hub Times // Marc Kovac – July 5, 2015* Columbus -- State education officials say they won't know until after the start of the new school year the total impact of policy and funding decisions made in the $71 billion-plus biennial state budget. Basic state foundation aid to schools, they said, won't decrease for any district. But a couple of line-item vetoes by Gov. John Kasich June 30 likely mean less overall state funding for more than 100 districts. Hudson is one of those districts. Based on estimates Hudson Superintendent Phil Herman has seen, the Hudson School District would see no reduction for fiscal 2016 but would have a $1.8 million reduction to state funding in the second year of the budget, 2017. "Because of the efforts to make reductions in the past, we are in a position we won't have to immediately seek tax funding," Herman said. The Hudson School District made previous reductions and reduced costs in order to operate as long as possible without going back to the taxpayers with a levy, he said. "But with this reduction, we may have to go back sooner," Herman said. "There will not be any immediate plans for a levy as a result of the state's proposed budget," he added. Herman said he was disappointed Gov. Kasich said the reductions were being made to districts who have the capacity to pay more. "Our taxpayers have already supported the schools, and that's disappointing to feel we're being punished for the revenues our community has already generated," Herman said. The Ohio Department of Education won't compile funding totals for districts until after the start of the new school year. "We are about the work of implementing the contents of HB 64," said Aaron Rausch, budget director for the state education department. "We will begin to implement those changes. When the bill becomes effective at the end of September, we will update all of the per pupil amounts and data …" On basic state aid, the budget allocates more than $20 billion over the biennium, the highest level on record. The legislation increases per-pupil funding by $100 annually -- to $5,900 in fiscal 2016 and $6,000 in '17 from $5,800 in the last fiscal year. State Superintendent Richard Ross said the budget also includes incentives for expanding career technical programs, an extra $40 million for early childhood education, $10 million for expanded classes enabling high schoolers to earn college credit and incentives for higher graduation and reading proficiency rates, among other changes. "We'll actually be funding school districts based on evidence that they are successfully educating our children," Ross said. But Ross and others did not have details about how Kasich's vetoes would affect overall school funding. The governor deleted a wealthy school district funding guarantee and a tangible personal property reimbursement supplement for certain districts. The administration has said the TPP supplement should be phased out, allowing the state's school funding formula to work as intended. That would mean more money for districts with less capacity to raise funds on their own and less money for districts with declining enrollments. Lawmakers, however, added the TPP supplement, among other budget moves, to ensure no district received less in funding during the biennium than they received in fiscal '15. In the end, Kasich vetoed the TPP supplement for the second year of the biennium. "… This guarantee provision diverts resources that could be targeted to lower capacity school districts and circumvents original intent of the law to limit the reimbursement payments so that they were both declining and temporary," Kasich wrote in his veto message. Lawmakers had proposed the supplement for more than 100 of the 600-plus school districts in the state. Affected districts will still receive the funding during the next school year, but the reimbursements will end thereafter. "To recognize the concerns that districts receiving TPP payments need more time to prepare for the decline in these payments, this veto will only apply to the FY 2017 payments …," Kasich wrote. An earlier estimate using enrollment totals from the fall put the second year TPP supplement at more than $84 million. An updated projection, using more recent enrollment statistics, put the total back at about $78.3 million. *OTHER* *New Hampshire Voters Bemoan Size of G.O.P. Field <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/05/us/size-of-gop-field-hinders-new-hampshires-role-as-national-screener.html?ref=politics> // NYT // Patrick Healy & Maggie Haberman – July 4, 2015* AMHERST, N.H. — The Independence Day parades across New Hampshire on Saturday turned into parades of presidential candidates, and voters like Stuart Harmon were left shaking their heads at the daunting reality of watching, hearing and judging more than 20 contenders for the White House over the next seven months. “This race feels more like a spectator sport than an election,” said Mr. Harmon, an independent who shook hands with former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida and watched a dozen other campaign contingents march through this town of about 11,000. “Having all these candidates is a real problem, because it’ll be hard to hear each of them. I’m interested in Jeb Bush, but it’s not easy to pay attention to just one when there are so many.” The likely field of 16 Republican candidates is stirring frustration, particularly among voters who say they feel more overwhelmed, even ambivalent, than ever before about their long-cherished responsibilities in holding the nation’s first primary. Some voters said they were already dreading the weeks of political fliers stuffed in their mailboxes, of campaign volunteers at their doors during the day and of television ads and automated phone calls all through the night. Others said they already had candidate fatigue. “Maybe I’ll just vote for the one who leaves me alone the most,” said Tim Sullivan, a Republican from Gilford. He compared his party’s pack of candidates to “a clown car where they never stop coming out.” For decades, New Hampshire has fought to keep its place at the front of the presidential nominating contests, and party leaders talk with almost religious fervor about the state’s duty to “screen” and “weed out” second-tier wannabes to save most other Americans the trouble. The state’s news outlets, political consultants, and hotel and hospitality industries also make tens of millions of dollars from the campaign operations. Politics is pastime here, but the 2016 race creates a challenge that is the opposite of a leisure pursuit: Is there such a thing for New Hampshire voters as too many presidential candidates? “I can’t keep track of all of them. It’s ridiculous,” Laura Major, an independent voter from Milford, said as she collected candidate stickers and free candy from volunteers for Mr. Bush and other campaigns along the parade route here. Steve Sartorelli, a registered independent from Auburn, said he felt that the plethora of long-shot candidates was “insulting our intelligence.” “It feels like a lot of Republicans are running for the recognition or to get a TV gig or another job, not because they actually believe they could win the presidency,” Mr. Sartorelli said. On the Democratic side are a mere five candidates, though only two, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, are showing real strength in polls. And those two names were the only ones on the lips of several voters at a campaign stop for Mrs. Clinton on Friday in Hanover, a liberal enclave that is home to Dartmouth College. As they stood in line for barbecue at Mrs. Clinton’s event, Ann Bracken and Sue Donnelly chuckled when they were asked about Lincoln Chafee, a former Rhode Island governor who is also running on the Democratic side. “It’s certainly interesting on the Republican side — they keep us entertained,” Ms. Bracken said. She offered a single name: “Trump.” While recent polls show Donald Trump running second in the Republican field here, many in New Hampshire still do not take him seriously. But interviews with two dozen Republicans suggested concern that Mr. Trump’s remarks, personality and billions of dollars would overshadow more credible Republican candidates. “Mr. Trump and some of the others are distractions, and it’s frustrating that the serious candidates won’t get all the attention,” said Bill Burtt, a Republican living in Tilton at the New Hampshire Veterans Home, which Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey visited on Friday afternoon. In Wolfeboro, a resort town in the northern part of the state, Mr. Christie and his sign-waving supporters were directly ahead of a caravan of volunteers for Senator Marco Rubio of Florida. Both men zigzagged along the route, urged by paradegoers to come squeeze their hands. “I like paying attention, but they have to get their act together, really,” Lori Kirwan said of the Republicans, shaking her head. “I don’t know,” she added, her voice trailing off. She and her husband both predicted that candidates would have to drop out well before Primary Day, or it would all become too unwieldy. State Senator Jeb Bradley, the Republican majority leader, said the complications of 2016 went beyond the sheer number of candidates: Voters are also struggling because there is no clear front-runner, as there was in 2012 (Mitt Romney), 2008 (John McCain), 2004 (George W. Bush) and 2000 (Mr. McCain). “This is the first time since 1996 when we have a wide-open contest, and there are now twice as many major candidates compared to back then,” Mr. Bradley said. As for his own preferences, they are increasing — Mr. Bush, Mr. Rubio, Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, Mr. Christie, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, Carly Fiorina, Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana — rather than shrinking. “But look, by the time our primary rolls around in February, I just can’t imagine there will be 16 people on the Republican ballot,” Mr. Bradley said. Others are not so sure. The emergence of “super PACs” could allow just a few wealthy supporters to finance advertising and other activities for their preferred candidates, giving many of the 2016 contenders the resources to survive poor showings in the first few nominating contests. “I don’t think Iowa’s going to solve anything — the Republicans will pick up from there and come here,” said Jack Donovan, an independent from Concord, referring to the presidential caucuses that are held just before the New Hampshire primary. “The candidates will still have money and more televised debates, and will think: Why not try their luck in New Hampshire?” It is the debates that start next month, far more than the number of candidates in the parades this weekend, that many voters are eager to see to help make up their minds. “Every day there are two more Republicans jumping into the race, but hopefully the debates will help us sort all of this out,” said Okie Howe, a 98-year-old Democrat and Army veteran living at the Tilton retirement home. She said she wanted to find a Republican to support because she was “sick of Hillary Clinton,” but thought she would probably vote for Mrs. Clinton in the end because the Republican field “was too big to make sense out of.” (As for the 73-year-old Mr. Sanders, Ms. Howe said, “He’s a bit too old, isn’t he?” She then chided herself for “being the pot calling the kettle black.”) Other Democrats are torn about not having their own surfeit of candidates this year. Katrina and Todd Spenceman of Chesterfield are a house divided. She is an ardent supporter of Mrs. Clinton, while her husband and many of her friends are Obama 2008 supporters who now lean toward Mr. Sanders. “The independent streak in this region is palpable,” Mr. Spenceman said, attributing some of the buck-the-Clinton behavior to that characteristic. “I am right on the border of Vermont, which is very Bernie,” Mrs. Spenceman said. “I’m experiencing a lot of discord between the former Hillarys abandoning Hillary for Bernie.” Would having more choices, as the Republicans do, benefit the Democratic electorate? “Yes and no,” Mr. Spenceman said. “Yes, from a Democratic view, that’d be swell. But I also know that too many choices paralyze people from making a decision.” *Sleepover at Mitt's: Christie, Rubio bunk with Romney at N.H. retreat <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/04/politics/mitt-romney-chris-christie-marco-rubio-sleepover/> // CNN // Cassie Spodak – July 4, 2015* Wolfeboro, New Hampshire (CNN)Truth or dare? Warring pillow forts? What does one do at a presidential candidate slumber party? We'll likely never know exactly what happened Friday at Mitt Romney's lakeside summer home in Wolfeboro, New Hampshire, where Chris Christie and Marco Rubio spent the night. But Romney shared a few details Saturday morning at the Wolfeboro Fourth of July parade, saying he didn't give either candidates any advice on running. "These guys will make their own mistakes, Romney said. "Hopefully, they won't follow mine." The men ate hamburgers, hot dogs, baked beans, corn and potato salad, Romney added. "It was great, they're great hosts," Rubio said Saturday. So what did they talk about? "Life. All kinds of stuff," Rubio said, adding, "No politics." According to Romney and his wife Ann, the group stayed up late chatting. "A lot of sports talk actually, and family, talked about our family and how we gather up here and what we do when we're up here. It was a lot of fun. We stayed up late last night," he said. Romney's extensive experience as a presidential candidate -- as well as his broad network of donors -- makes him a unique resource for candidates competing for votes in New Hampshire's first-in-the-nation primary. He said its exciting to watch the candidates this time around and even weighed in on the Democrats running. "I thought it was going to be kind of boring, but I think Bernie Sanders has made it kind of exciting," Romney said. On Friday, Christie praised the former Massachusetts governor. "What matters most to me is that he's a resource for me," said the New Jersey governor, who was an early backer of Romney's 2012 candidacy. "And he's a resource for our party, someone who has been doing this process twice. He's been our nominee. That's somebody who you want to talk to and listen to, if you're someone who's running for the first time, like I am." Christie, who is finishing up a five-day visit to New Hampshire, said it's too soon to expect an endorsement from Romney. For his part, Romney on Saturday said he's not going to endorse anybody until later in the nomination process. "A lot of these folks helped me during my campaign. I'm going to be as loyal to them as they were to me," he said. But Rubio and Christie are not the only two GOP candidates to sit down with Romney. On Monday, he'll meet with Jeb Bush and his wife, Columba, at Walker's Point, the Bush family home in Maine. *ObamaCare win turns up heat on GOP presidential field <http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/246812-obamacare-win-turns-heat-on-gop-presidential-field> // The Hill // Peter Sullivan and Sarah Ferris – July 4, 2015* ObamaCare's victory at the Supreme Court is putting new pressure on Republican presidential candidates to map out a replacement to the healthcare law — a task that has eluded the party for more than five years. With President Obama’s law twice affirmed by the nation’s high court, congressional Republicans now say a victory in 2016 is their best chance to tear down the statute and replace it with a GOP-favored alternative. “I definitely think there will be pressure on these guys to put something out there,” said Lanhee Chen, the policy director for Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign. “They will need to have a plan.” However, few of the party’s dozen 2016 hopefuls have thus far offered concrete details about what their alternative to the law would look like. Chen said Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) are “arguably further along,” in their planning, a point echoed by other experts. Rubio’s plan includes giving tax credits to people to help them afford coverage and setting up high-risk insurance pools for people with pre-existing conditions. His plan is still in the form of an op-ed, and has not been fleshed out with details like the size of the credits and how it would be paid for. Jindal’s plan — outlined last year in a 23-page document — centers on providing $100 billion over ten years in block grants to states that come up with their own innovative healthcare proposals. That funding would also be based on how well states control costs like premiums and how well they ensure access to high-risk individuals, such as people with pre-existing conditions. Jindal’s and Rubio’s plans are more developed than much of the rest of the field. Jeb Bush’s campaign referred The Hill to a blog post posted this week on Medium, which includes a half-dozen bullet points about a system to “empower states” but offers no specifics. He proposed a form of “tax relief” for premiums and a “conservative solution” for people with pre-existing conditions. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, another one of the party’s frontrunners, has also been mum on details, and his campaign did not respond to a request for comment on his replacement plan. Asked on Fox News last week about his replacement plan, Walker mentioned letting the market “drive things,” giving consumers “full information” about their choices and allowing people to buy insurance across state lines. The campaign of Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) also did not respond to a request for comment. When asked how he would replace the law in January, Paul indicated he would largely return to the pre-ObamaCare system. “We could try freedom for a while,” Paul told Fox News. “Nobody's talking about a time when the government doesn't participate at all,” he said. “Even before ObamaCare, the government did take care of the bottom five or ten percent of our public, who were on Medicaid, and then there was also charity, so there are different ways that we take care and help the poor. Nobody's saying we wouldn't still do those things if we didn't have ObamaCare.” A problem for Republicans is that ObamaCare’s coverage expansion gets more ingrained with each passing year. Tom Miller, who advised Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on healthcare during his 2008 campaign, said he doesn’t expect any of the candidates to put forward a fully fleshed plan — because they don’t need to. A promise to repeal ObamaCare remains a litmus test for the GOP, but Miller said it doesn’t mean that a Republican president would make it the first goal of their presidency. The most likely scenario for a GOP president is a gradual phasing out of ObamaCare mandates, with help from Congress, to avert the chaos that would result from an immediate and complete repeal of the law, he said. “You’re steering the ship in a different direction but it’s not going in a 180 degree change,” said Miller, a fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. “No matter who is elected, it’s going to be slower and little bit more incremental.” Even so, any Republican president would need to act quickly, he warned. By the time the next president takes office, the law will have been in place for nearly seven years. “You run out of time. Every year into the future makes it harder to go into a different direction," Miller said, adding that he hasn’t yet endorsed a candidate. The difficulty in drafting a replacement plan for ObamaCare became clear over the last six months as congressional Republicans scrambled to come up with contingency plans for the King v. Burwell ruling. Like that decision, a full repeal of ObamaCare would cause millions of people to, at least temporarily, lose their subsidies. Chen, the former Romney advisor, said that candidates have “guideposts” from two replacement plans, one from Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) and one from Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). Both plans offer a form of tax credits, as ObamaCare does, but without the law’s mandate to buy coverage and same rules on pre-existing conditions and what a plan must cover. After ObamaCare survived its last major legal challenge last week, Republicans acknowledge that full repeal is impossible with the president still in office. Congress still has a few options to try to peel back pieces of the law — primarily, a legislative tool known as reconciliation that allows certain budget bills to bypass the Senate’s 60-vote threshold. Others are hoping to slash the president’s healthcare budgets through appropriation bills that make the law tougher to implement. But Obama wields the veto pen. Several Republican presidential candidates in the last few weeks have said they are in favor of abolishing the Senate’s filibuster, which would help a Republican president repeal ObamaCare even if the party can’t reach 60 votes in the chamber. That idea, though, has drawn opposition from one of the biggest ObamaCare critics in the 2016 field, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas). Walker, along with former Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, have all endorsed the idea, while Bush said he would “certainly consider” it during an appearance on the Hugh Hewitt show. Still, there’s near universal consensus that the debate over full repeal will have to take place in the presidential debates. “In 2016, we need to show the country what exactly we’d replace this law with,” House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said on CBS's "Face the Nation" after the ruling. “So that when we win the election in 2016, we have the ability to do it in 2017.” *The GOP’s pathetic crybaby agenda: Trump, Scalia and the whiny, paranoid new face of the right <http://www.salon.com/2015/07/05/the_gops_pathetic_crybaby_agenda_trump_scalia_and_the_whiny_paranoid_new_face_of_the_right/> // Salon // Bill Curry – July 5, 2015* Republicans have no agenda. America won't fall for culture/religion wars anymore. Petulance is all they have left We are numbed by Charleston; by its irrefutable proof of our still virulent racism and violent, gun-crazed culture, by being made to stare once again into the face of evil. Yet when the families of the slain stood up in court to voice forgiveness of Dylann Roof, we were startled and suddenly it was harder to divide us. Our politics is small to begin with; next to such staggering grief, it seems smaller still. Like everyone on Facebook, Roof told us his life story in pictures. Absent the shots of him sporting the insignia of the Confederacy, apartheid and Nazi Germany, it’s hard to conceive of the Confederate flag being banished from Wal-Mart, let alone the ground of his state Capitol. Some may fly it out of mere nostalgia, but its core messages, now as always, are racism and sedition. It’s the flag of those who loved slavery more than their country; who sent hundreds of thousands to die rather than let one slave go free. A hundred and fifty years after Appomattox it is at last coming down. Long indeed is the arc of the moral universe. The victory is more than symbolic. Fifty years ago as part of their post-Civil Rights Act national membership drive, Republicans began beaming coded racial messages to white voters. That code just got easier to crack. Fifteen years ago they began to amp up voter suppression under cover of absurdly inflated claims of voter fraud. If challenged on their motives or their facts they hurl furious denials. They can hurl all they want now. Debate has shifted. We’ve seen the pictures. The slaughter of the Emanuel innocents was the most savage in a line of white-on-black slayings that pricked the nation’s conscience. The list of martyrs is long: Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Freddie Gray, Eric Garner, Walter Scott and countless others, known and unknown. Their deaths, though tragic, were not in vain. America is at last sifting through the evidence. A decade ago, most whites rejected every claim of racial disparity in our law enforcement and criminal justice systems. Now sentencing reform and cameras on cops are popular policies amongst all voters. We’ve a long ways to go, but there’s less doubt about where we’re headed. President Obama has spoken eloquently of the millions of young black men in crisis in America. The chilling saga of Dylann Roof reminds us that millions of young white men are also in crisis. We can’t pretend to know its full nature or all its complex causes. We do know that, like young black men, young white men need better education and better jobs, better mental health services and better parenting. It’s probably time for someone to talk to them and their families as Obama spoke of and to young black men. For sure, it’s time we stop talking to them the way we do. The right has long charged liberalism with fostering alienation, dependency, isolation and addiction among the poor — and leading minorities to reject traditional values and to see themselves as victims and whites as culprits. Now consider Dylann Roof: a jobless, stoned, opiate-abusing high school dropout who rejects such traditional values as law, order, hard work, sobriety and tolerance to vent his rage and blames his problems on a racially denominated ‘other.’ The right blames all social pathologies on the left but would howl were anyone to imply that it helped spawn Dylann Roof — or that its anti-intellectualism led any young man to forgo college or that its economic policies left anyone without the chance for a decent job at decent pay. How does a young man so ensnared rationalize his fate? Roof got many of his theories from the website of the Concerned Citizens Council—“We oppose all efforts to mix the races”—headed by the lovely and vivacious Earl P. Holt III (“Black people are the laziest, stupidest, most criminally inclined race in the history of the world”). He was a donor to at least five current or former GOP presidential candidates. But the problem isn’t confined to the dark demimonde of far right hate groups. Young white males are dropping out of college, high school and the workforce in droves. In the reddest of states many turn to crime and drugs. They deserve better than a steady diet of racially coded conspiracy theories; better than Rick Santorum calling college a liberal trap or Mike Huckabee calling their centrist black president a “tyrant”; better than being taught each day to despise those who think different thoughts or blame those who don’t look enough like them. The toxicity of right-wing politics seeps steadily into the larger culture. It runs on infantile rage and so must infantilize white men. We must find a way to reach even the ones who seem a danger only to themselves. Some Republicans must feel shame, or at least sense risk. Late last month was full of historic happenings and at every one Republicans seemed out of sync or ill at ease. On Wednesday the Senate sent Obama the bill authorizing fast track approval for the Trans Pacific Partnership. It was a big win for them and a bigger one for him. Passage pleased both parties’ big donors, who are after all the same people, more or less. Some say the fight left Obama with wounds to heal but many of the wounded were Democrats in Congress, a group whose health he seldom asks after. Labor was mad but no one recalls the last time a union went off the reservation. Democratic voters tend to dislike trade deals, but if Obama’s happy they’re happy. GOP voters really hate fast track, so House Republicans didn’t take any victory laps. Passing the bill meant breaking their sacred vow not to let Obama do anything. His continued low standing would help them in 2016. But business wanted the bill and they figured Obama’s last months in office would offer him few chances to gild his resume. Wouldn’t you know a big one got dropped in his lap the very next day? By a 6-3 vote the Supreme Court again upheld the Affordable Care Act. The TPP was a big win for Obama but this was huge. When the case was filed, few took it seriously. When the Court took it up, opinion shifted. Why would it go to the trouble of yet another review if five justices weren’t at least thinking of voting for the plaintiffs? The case came down to four words. Under the law the federal government may subsidize consumers buying insurance through exchanges “established by the states.” But only 13 states set up exchanges. The rest use the federal exchange. The IRS ruled that Congress meant to provide subsidies to those purchasing via the federal exchange. The Court ruled that the IRS ruled correctly. In a rude dissent, Justice Scalia called Justice Roberts’ majority opinion “quite absurd… interpretive jiggery-pokery” that undermined the Court’s reputation for “honest jurisprudence.” The right exploded. Among GOP presidential candidates, Mike Huckabee outdid even Scalia, calling Roberts’ ruling, you guessed it, “an act of judicial tyranny.” Only men as frivolous as Alito, Thomas and Scalia could fail to see it truly was a frivolous case. As loud as Scalia screamed that those four words could mean just one thing, Roberts was right to rule that the act’s 381,113 other words meant just the opposite. Courts give agencies wide berths to interpret statutes but as Roberts took care to emphasize, here it didn’t need to. Congress’ intent was clear. John Boehner vowed another repeal vote—it would be the 57th— but voters want to fix the law, not kill it. Republicans keep promising an alternative plan, but in the narrow confines of their ideology there is none. Obamacare, nee Romneycare, started at the Heritage Foundation. Heritage now denies paternity but when Romneycare was signed into law, its president attended the christening. GOP dead-enders are alone now on health care. In the TPP fight their donors stood at their side, but here the insurers, hospitals and docs are all with Obama. On Friday the Court dropped the other shoe, voting 5-4 to recognize the right of all same sex couples to marry. The Republican response to Justice Kennedy’s heartfelt opinion was predictable enough. Scott Walker said he’d amend the Constitution. Huckabee called it tyranny. Ted Cruz, sounding increasingly unhinged, preached nullification, if not outright sedition. But Jeb Bush and even Ben Carson said it was time to move on. They knew they were on the wrong side of not just history but demography, a bad place to be with an election coming on. Watching Friday’s joyous celebration in front of the Court, it was hard to imagine anyone not wanting to join in. For decades Republicans fought same-sex marriage on religious grounds. Watching those revelers I felt as I did hearing the families who forgave Dylann Roof — glad to bear witness to such a powerful expression of love. I wanted to be there and wondered if any Republicans wished they were, too. Later that day Obama flew to South Carolina to deliver a eulogy for the Rev. Clementa Pinckney of Charleston’s AME church. For six years even some of his staunch supporters had wanted him to address issues of race more forcefully and directly. On Friday he did all they’d asked and more. That he did it in Pinckney’s honor — and in his church — made his words more powerful still. Early on, he evoked the history of all black churches, …‘hush harbors’ where slaves could worship in safety… rest stops for the weary on the Underground Railroad; bunkers for the foot soldiers of the Civil Rights Movement. He then called the shootings what they were, “not random, but … a means of control, a way to terrorize and oppress.” He cited a policy or two — gun safety, voting rights — but mostly he preached about prejudice, duty, grace, forgiveness and love. The camera often cut to Boehner. who couldn’t help looking out of place. Asked once on “Meet the Press” if he believed Obama was a Christian, Boehner replied tartly, “I take him at his word.” Meaning, of course, that he didn’t. Hearing Obama preach the word, I wondered what Boehner had to say now. It was a historic week, though to pilfer a thought from Justice Kennedy, perhaps in ways we don’t yet see. Kennedy’s and Roberts’ opinions will mean more or less depending on who our next president is. The Charleston tragedy changed us all, but in ways that will be hard to measure and impossible to prove. What seems most certain is that our politics is changing, perhaps even in a fundamental way. Little more than a week ago the press portrayed Obama as reeling from a minor dust-up with House Dems over trade. Today he bestrides the town like a colossus. Politics is a tough game; he may be back on the skids shortly. But what happened to Republicans this week feels more lasting. Less than a year after their triumph in the 2014 midterms they seem suddenly to be in more than just cyclical trouble. There are, I think, three reasons for it. The first reason is that the culture wars that have raged since the 1960s are at last winding down, at least as we’ve known them. Such historic changes don’t happen overnight, but the week showed America at or near at or near a tipping point. Race ignited these wars. Issues of gender and sexuality fueled them. America is taking a harder look at all who seek to foment or exploit racial anger or fear, even as it continues to be transformed on issues of sexual preference and identity. We don’t need to prove Republican complicity in the culture wars. They deny ever stooping to such tactics. Fine; if so, they’ve nothing to worry about. The second reason is that religion is—there’s no better word for it—evolving. If the GOP can’t keep pace it will pay a steep price; we all know what evolution does to those who fail to adapt. Its response to Pope Francis’ masterfully composed encyclical on climate change is a case in point. Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum, and Jeb Bush, heretofore three of the showiest Catholics in all of Christendom, told His Holiness quite bluntly to mind his own beeswax. It seems they don’t see how a threat to the survival of our species has a moral dimension. They don’t listen to scientists either so one wonders whose advice they do take. (Oh, right.) It was strangest coming from Bush, whose strict Catholic faith compelled him to hand Terry Schiavo’s body over to Congress for disposition. Since “Catholic” and “Reagan Democrat” are near synonyms, dissing the Pope should come with fallout, but Republicans don’t see it. James Inhofe, the moron who brought a snowball to the Senate to prove global warming’s a hoax–he also chairs the environment committee–went on a Family Research Council radio show to say Francis unwittingly fulfilled a dark biblical prophecy, which would, technically speaking, make him an instrument of Satan. The Holy Father will be here in September. Republicans underestimate how happy we’ll all be to see him; it’s another event they’ll wish they could attend in good faith. The third reason is the absolute dearth of anything remotely resembling a real GOP policy agenda, unless you count corporate tax cuts. It turns out they can’t have one, partly because their base is so crazy and partly because they are. For six years Obama tried to sell them Mitt Romney’s healthcare reform and George Bush’s immigration reform. They couldn’t even meet for coffee. More than once he tried to sell them one of their own fiscal policies, but when word got out Obama was for it, they no longer could be. Their defense hawks’ favorite remedy is more tough talk. What’s their alternative to a nuclear deal with Iran? Best possible answer: do nothing and hope the sanctions regime holds. Likeliest answer: leave it to Bibi. For a while now we’ve known and they’ve known that time’s running out on the politics of racism and sexism or as they call it, traditional values. What we learned last week is how fast the sand is running through that hour glass. With those cards harder to hide up their sleeve and with no agenda to peddle, Republicans wandered all week from press conference to press conference looking dazed and confused. The smart ones felt the ground shift beneath their feet. It isn’t just the tyrant Obama staring them down now on healthcare. It’s a 6-3 majority of a Republican Supreme Court, their friends in the medical and insurance industries and a majority of voters. On discrimination they have to beat not just “the radical gay lobby” but another likely Supreme Court majority and an even bigger popular one. For 20 years they ridiculed Al Gore for reading, knowing and caring so much about our environment. They’ll find Pope Francis a tougher target. As for race, at Rev. Pinckney’s service we saw love’s power to heal and unite. If they watched, they saw it too. Last week made Republicans easier to see through. My favorite Republican is Donald Trump, who can’t open his mouth without giving away the game. Trump used his campaign kickoff to deliver a rant so offensive to Mexicans it forced Univision to cancel its broadcast of his tasteless beauty pageant. To retaliate he banned Univision employees from his golf courses, a move sure to help GOP outreach. Then NBC pulled out of his pageants and kicked him off “Celebrity Apprentice.” It’ll be interesting to see how many relationships he can torch before he feels he’s reaped enough publicity to declare victory and get back to the links. Seeing their limp diversification plans so easily thwarted makes Republicans more desperate to rev up the base. They’re always on the lookout for new ways to divide and conquer and lately they think they’ve found one. It’s called xenophobia. If you want to know more about it you can visit the same websites Dylann Roof frequents or those of any far right European political party. As you may know, all are on the rise. Their métier is immigration but they traffic in every species of nativism. Republicans paint with a somewhat broader brush but clearly their new culture war focuses on the foreign ‘other’; a mix of ISIS and immigrants, of Putin, China and Iran; of anyone and everyone who is or can be made to look scary. The world’s a scary enough place but they know how to make it feel even more so. That they do it so well is one reason why Obama’s foreign policy grades lag behind all his other grades by eight or more points in polls. With no viable or salable domestic policies to run on in 2016 Republicans will complement their xenophobic neoconservatism with rehashes of various schemes to cut taxes on the rich and slash spending for the old, the poor and the sick; that and a vicious assault on the Democratic presidential nominee. It’s a strategy anyone can see coming, so defeating it should be no problem, right? Wrong. There are in fact two problems. One is that Republicans always nominate their least crazy candidate. Every four years Democrats pray they’ll pick a Pat Buchanan or Michelle Bachman, a Ted Cruz or Ben Carson, but they never do. We hope the far right will rise up and win it all but it turns out even Tea Partiers vote tactically. In the end the party always goes with a Dole, a Romney or a McCain. Even George Bush didn’t look like a guy who’d bankrupt the nation or lie his way into a catastrophic war. Granted, in a huge 2016 field only two or three fit the bill of not seeming crazy, but they’ll find a way to thread the needle. Anyway, Democrats have a bigger problem: themselves. Hillary Clinton runs ahead of her field even as Bernie Sanders puts up impressive numbers; in the size of his crowds; in his small donors–200,000 of whom have already ponied up $8 million—and in state polls. Thus far it isn’t enough to get old liberal lobbies to take a serious look. Everybody’s read a poll that told them, as polls always do, not to rock the boat. The smart money’s been wrong so often it’s a wonder they still call it that, but labor and environmental leaders still think and talk like political consultants. Democrats’ resistance to open debate is jaw dropping. You’d think they’d have learned from their experience with Obama. When he disappointed them early on, they held their tongues. Looking back, do they still think their silence did him any favors? Most think their mute loyalty to Hillary is helping now, but it isn’t. Her strategy is clear. Like Obama in 2008, she hopes to break big-dollar fundraising records while giving speeches laced with populist metaphors. On national security she’ll run to Obama’s right, where she thinks it safest for the country and herself. She’s a liberal on social issues and for once it may help. The two issues that matter most to voters are the twin slow motion collapses of our democracy and our middle class. On both Clinton will do as she always does: preach the glories of growth and technology while nodding to political reform. The TPP vote showed us once again that she, Obama and most elite Dems march in lockstep with global capital, which runs on corruption. It’s the wrong strategy for her and us — but absent a real contest and an open debate, just try moving her off it. It was an amazing week. America shed bigotry even while mourning its victims. We saw a glimpse of a possible new politics. The country and the Court said loud racism and homophobia are no longer traditional or Christian values. A Republican Party that trafficked in bigotry and looked suddenly cornered. Many of its most easily identified leaders—Scalia, Trump, Cruz, Huckabee, Walker, Santorum, the list goes on—acting like infants, gave the lie to the whole enterprise. Still picking fights with their chosen cast of villains– terrorists, immigrants, gays, liberals, Obama—they saw the list of their foes suddenly lengthen to include Walmart, Univision, NBC, the Pope, the Supreme Court, the Constitution, the union and the rule of law. It was the future itself and it was circling them like a shark. Perhaps most unexpectedly, the week brought the coming elections into focus by exposing the choice toward which we drift: between GOP supply side economics and xenophobia and the Democrats’ neoliberal economics, pay to play politics and social liberalism. There’s no question which is the better choice, but neither one will save us. With our environment, our democracy and our middle class all at their tipping points, we need something better. The most amazing thing about this week was that it reminded us of how to get it. The heroes of Emanuel church and the same-sex marriage movement know. So did Frederick Douglass: “If there is no struggle there is no progress.” We can choose progress, but never quietly. *OTHER 2016 NEWS* *Facing a Selfie Election, Presidential Hopefuls Grin and Bear It <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/05/us/politics/facing-a-selfie-election-presidential-hopefuls-grin-and-bear-it.html?ref=politics> // NYT // Jeremy W. Peters and & Ashley Parker – July 4, 2015* “Press that white button! This right here,” the former secretary of state instructed a technologically deficient fan in New Hampshire who was fumbling to work an iPhone camera. Her patience thinning, Hillary Rodham Clinton took matters into her own hands and jabbed the button herself. And with the sound of an electronic shutter snap, another selfie — the must-have political souvenir of 2016 — went up into the cloud for campaign posterity. Who wants their babies kissed or their yard signs autographed anymore? This is the Selfie Election. And if you are running for president, you have no choice but to submit. Candidates can now spend an hour — or sometimes two, as Senator Rand Paul did last month in New Hampshire — exhausting a line of eager selfie seekers. Others, like Senator Ted Cruz, have learned to add an extra 20 minutes at the beginning and end of events because so many people want pictures. Jeb Bush has perfected a technique suited to his 6-foot-3 frame: For his shorter fans, he will take the picture with his own outstretched selfie stick of an arm. The sons of Gov. Scott Walker have watched their father take so many, they say he has significantly polished his shutterbug skills. Gov. Chris Christie’s staff says he has taken “too many to count.” But as campaigns adjust to a new self-focused social media world, some are left wondering whether more meaningful voter-candidate interactions are suffering. When candidates oblige so many people, some requesting multiple takes to straighten that smile, square a double chin or get a pesky photo bomber out of the frame, are they losing the chance to clarify a policy position, listen to concerns or even just look a voter in the eye? “It’s self-serving, and the candidate is kind of screwed,” said Craig Robinson, a former political director of the Iowa Republican Party. “They just have to put up with it, because how do you decipher who is a fan and who wants to fill their profile with pictures of them with candidates?” said Mr. Robinson, now the editor of The Iowa Republican, a political publication. Indeed, it is not always clear whether the people asking for photographs even like or plan to vote for the candidate they are posing with, or whether they just want a Facebook trophy to flaunt. Not all candidates care to oblige. “Please stop,” wrote Ben Carson, the retired pediatric neurosurgeon and Republican presidential hopeful, in a recent opinion piece for The Washington Post that raised a jarring if somewhat hyperbolic concern: Selfies kill. “Beyond the obvious narcissism of endlessly photographing oneself and blasting it over social networks for others to admire, selfies are dangerous,” he went on, citing a few examples of how inattentive selfie snappers had met their demise. (Falling off a cliff in Portugal, for example.) Former President Bill Clinton has complained that he is inundated with requests whenever he goes out in public. At an event last year with another former president, George W. Bush, Mr. Clinton observed that even eating out had become a challenge — to which Mr. Bush cracked, “At least they’re still asking.” President Obama has had to draw the line before. “I want to warn in advance, I can’t do a selfie with everybody,” he told a crowd last month. Few people embody the selfie craze like Maggie Fitzgerald, a lobbyist in Des Moines who has maneuvered her way into photos with politicians willing and unwilling. Her biggest gets: Donald J. Trump, Rick Perry and Gov. Bobby Jindal, whom she found eager and obliging, and Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Paul and Mr. Carson, who seemed much less enthusiastic. “Sometimes they’ll ask me, ‘Don’t you want a normal picture?’ ” Ms. Fitzgerald said in an interview. “No, I just want a selfie.” She is undecided in the race, but said she gained some insight into the candidates by their demeanor during selfies. “Most of them aren’t stiff about it,” Ms. Fitzgerald added. “Some of them might be. But they shouldn’t be president.” Then there are those who see the selfie as just one more example of how people have become slaves to their devices at the expense of human interaction. Queen Elizabeth II has said she finds the trend disconcerting and indicated she misses eye contact with her subjects. For security teams on the campaigns, all this close contact between candidates and strangers can be a challenge, but in some ways it is easier to monitor than a traditional rope line. That is because selfies keep people’s hands up where they can be seen. Many campaigns say they are benefiting after posing for all those pictures. When shared on Facebook and Instagram, they can exponentially increase a candidate’s visibility, spreading an authentic memento that helps extend the chatter around a rally beyond those who attended. “This is something that campaigns should embrace and be very happy with, because it’s just free advertising,” said Mr. Paul’s chief digital strategist, Vincent Harris. The Paul campaign sees a branding opportunity. When people line up for photos, campaign aides often erect a backdrop with a “Rand” logo on it for people to pose in front of. These exercises have also resulted in a little horizon broadening for Mr. Paul, who picked up a new term on the trail: “Us-ie,” a selfie with multiple people. The ubiquity of camera phones at campaign stops is forcing aides to become proficient in operating different brands. Rick Tyler, an aide to Mr. Cruz, said the staff member who usually traveled with the senator was now well versed in how to quickly snap pictures with a Samsung Galaxy versus an iPhone. The demand for selfies has grown so much, he added, that even walking just a short distance from one event to another can be an ordeal. “Our schedulers will say to me: ‘He’s just going 100 steps. Why would it take 20 minutes to get there?’ ” Mr. Tyler said. “Well, travel with us and you’ll see.” Senator Lindsey Graham said he could probably benefit from losing 15 pounds to make his selfies a bit more flattering. But his attitude toward selfies is upbeat: Society, he said, is richer for the selfie. “When we take selfies and chat, it’s the beauty of American democracy,” Mr. Graham said. “I don’t think Putin really does this,” he added, referring to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. “I don’t think he probably has to worry about selfies.” Senator Marco Rubio will indulge people who want selfies. But he often travels with a professional photographer who takes photos of him with voters as an aide trails behind, handing out index cards listing a website where supporters can go to download their pictures. The benefit? Not only does the photographer speed the process and produce higher-quality images, but voters are asked to provide personal information on Mr. Rubio’s website. Before they can view their photos, Rubio supporters have told the campaign their name, their home and email addresses, which issues matter most to them and if they are willing to volunteer. Even voters who embrace the selfie culture can seem slightly conflicted. Just take Lincoln Boyd, 22, who sneaked up to the stage at a recent conservative gathering and captured a selfie with Mr. Rubio that quickly went viral. In a telephone interview, Mr. Boyd said he would have preferred to “grill” Mr. Rubio, asking him, “Why weren’t you able to corral the Republicans to get behind immigration?” But, he added, “there’s a time and a place for that.” And, Mr. Boyd explained, “we’re millennials, it’s the 21st century, and if I’m with the candidate and I can get a quick picture with him, I’m going to do that.” *Voters are shifting to Democrats, flashing a warning for Republicans <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/lost-ground-for-gop-signals-challenges-for-2016/2015/07/04/0b6703d6-226e-11e5-aeb9-a411a84c9d55_story.html?tid=pm_politics_pop_b> // WaPo // Dan Balz - July 4, 2015* The Gallup organization reported its latest findings on party identification late last week, and the report contained good news for the Democrats and a flashing yellow for Republicans. The Democrats “have regained an advantage” over the GOP in party affiliation, Gallup’s Jeffrey M. Jones wrote in an accompanying analysis. Republicans, he added, “have seemingly lost the momentum they had going into last fall’s elections.” The current numbers don’t mean Republicans can’t win the White House in 2016. The Democrats’ advantage is not as large as at other points in the past, for example. But the findings add to a series of data points that underscore the challenges ahead for a party trying to keep pace with a rapidly changing country. The latest numbers essentially mark a reset that returns party affiliation to its modern historical norm. Democrats long have enjoyed the advantage over Republicans in Gallup’s measures. In those few periods when the GOP drew even or slightly ahead (after Republicans took control of Congress in 1994 or after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001), the party has been unable to hold that ground for long. These have obviously been good weeks for President Obama and the Democrats. The Supreme Court’s decisions rejecting another legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act and ruling that same-sex marriage is now legal around the country gave the Obama administration two significant victories that were at odds with Republican doctrine. Obama’s eulogy at the memorial service for the Rev. Clementa Pinckney, one of nine people slain last month after Bible study at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, S.C., was further evidence of a president determined to leverage the powers of his office to advance an agenda at odds with the policies and positions of the GOP. Republicans in Congress have blocked his path to legislative success on many of Obama’s pet issues: gun control, minimum wage, immigration reform and climate change among them. But the president’s sharpened rhetoric on these and other issues signaled a renewal of the quadrennial battle for public opinion and electoral support. Obama has repeated his attacks on the GOP as a party out of touch with the country, as a party of the past during a time of historic change. Hillary Rodham Clinton is echoing that same message about the Republicans as she campaigns for the Democratic nomination. Democratic Party affiliation no doubt has benefited by a modest rise in Obama’s approval ratings, which were weak through most of 2014 and have recovered somewhat this spring and summer. The stronger Obama’s approval ratings next year, the more likely it is that the Democrats will retain the White House for a third consecutive term. This isn’t the first time Obama has enjoyed a confluence of good events and renewed energy, only to see it slip away. Such ebbs and flows have marked his presidency from the start and could pull him down from the high moment he is enjoying. Clinton is widely popular among Democrats of all ideological stripes, even as she faces a challenge from the left for the nomination from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). Still, she carries substantial baggage that could affect her prospects in a general election, if she is the party’s nominee. Republicans must hope that they nominate a presidential candidate who the public sees as sharing its values and who embodies the future direction of the country. For now, however, the contest for the nomination offers potholes and pitfalls. “Although Obama and the Republican majority in Congress remain a major focus of the political news coverage, attention is increasingly turning to the 2016 presidential campaign,” Jones’s analysis notes. “Here Democrats may be benefiting from having a well-known and relatively popular front-running candidate in Hillary Clinton, which paints a contrast to the large, fractured and generally less well-known field of Republican presidential candidates.” The Republican field on paper is substantially better than it was four years ago. But at present, no one is capturing the interest or imagination of the voters. The best known among the group is former Florida governor Jeb Bush. But his family name and resistance hobble him to another Bush presidency. The other Republicans have barely registered, even among party faithful. Every one of the candidates has a personal story he or she thinks will turn him or her into a more compelling figure, but few voters are listening at this point. The seeming strength of the field has yet to return dividends to the party as a whole. Nor have the candidates begun to engage one another. When they do, the party will be plunged into a debate about the future — of health care, of the environment, of same-sex marriage, of the economy. On some of these issues, the divisions risk playing into Obama’s and Clinton’s characterization of the Republicans being caught in the past. Obamacare animates the Republican base but is a call for repeal a winning issue? On same-sex marriage, should Republicans stand for a constitutional amendment to give states the power to decide the definition of marriage, as some GOP candidates advocate, or try to take the issue off the agenda? On climate change, the challenge appears to be finding the right language and the right balance on policy. How will the candidates divide on this issue? The Republicans running for president have choices to make as they attempt to position themselves and their party as being in touch with the aspirations of a majority of the voters. The principles and values they stand for and the fights they decide to take on will determine their success. What they have lost in affiliation over the past few months is not irretrievably gone, but having to make up lost ground is hardly the way Republicans wanted to start the 2016 campaign. *Presidential candidates campaign in July Fourth parades <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/presidential-candidates-campaign-in-july-fourth-parades/2015/07/04/2cecf5ae-2275-11e5-a135-935065bc30d0_story.html> // AP // Kathleen Ronayne – July 4, 2015* AMHERST, N.H. — Alongside the patriotic music and waving flags Saturday in parades across Iowa and New Hampshire were clear reminders of a presidential race coming up next year: Red balloons promoting “Jeb! 2016,” a tractor draped in a Rick Perry banner and dutiful volunteers holding signs and chanting for their chosen candidates. Marching in Fourth of July parades in these early voting states has become a tradition for politicians seeking the White House, giving them a chance to boost their name recognition and glad-hand with voters. Former Govs. Jeb Bush of Florida, Rick Perry of Texas and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island as well as South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham worked the crowd in Amherst, while Hillary Rodham Clinton marched in a parade in New Hampshire’s North Country. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio spent the holiday in New Hampshire’s Lakes Region, as Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley met voters in Iowa. __ Clinton marched in a Fourth of July parade in Gorham, New Hampshire, trailed by a band of supporters waving signs and separated by a long rope from the pack of journalists that followed. “I’ll tell you what — we need to get a Democratic president,” Clinton told one woman along the parade route, who asked about the health care overhaul. “I’m going to not only defend it, I’m going to make it even better.” One man who carried a sign that read, “Benghazi” also followed the candidate. Alluding to her time representing New York in the Senate, he screamed repeatedly, “Carpetbagger!” Another man on the route yelled, “What about Benghazi? What about the emails?” Clinton smiled broadly, shaking hands and stopping for quick photos. At one point, she posed for a photo with two New Hampshire beauty pageant contestants, who playfully flexed their biceps. ___ Graham and Perry brought the energy to Amherst, running through the streets waving, shouting jokes and posing for photos. “Sorry the government’s so screwed up!” Graham shouted to the crowd numerous times, often followed by an apology to any children in the crowd about the future of Social Security. The former governor and current senator shook hands in the street, prompting jokes of a Perry-Graham presidential ticket. Later, Perry snapped a cell phone picture of Graham with two voters outside their home. Chafee, meanwhile, walked the route with just a few aides and no large signs bearing his name — nothing to indicate he’s vying for the Democratic presidential nomination. __ Bush took a more methodical approach, shaking so many hands that his team had to nearly run down an entire street to catch up with the procession. His campaign handed out red “Jeb! 2016” balloons along the entire parade route. “There’s nothing behind us — other than Hillary,” Bush joked to a voter who chided him for holding up the parade. While Clinton campaigned elsewhere, a team of her supporters marched right behind Bush’s, their blue signs in sharp contrast with his red. With his son George P. Bush, Texas’s land commissioner, by his side, Bush picked up a number of small children, posed for selfies and thanked voters who said they’ve been longtime fans of the Bushs. One of those voters wore a shirt that said “Bush Hat Trick.” ___ Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal said he got clear instructions on how to behave in an Iowa parade — no throwing things to the crowd. Jindal walked in a July Fourth parade in the Des Moines suburb of Urbandale. Accompanied by his wife, Jindal was the only Republican presidential candidate there, though other contenders had representatives there. Jindal said he was cautioned that Iowa and Louisiana parades are different. “We’re used to throwing things in Louisiana parades. We’re told that’s not allowed here,” he said. Jindal said that one of the first time the family went to Disney World, the children were upset because Mickey Mouse didn’t throw them anything. “In Louisiana every single parade, not just Mardi Gras, you’re supposed to throw things,” the governor said. Jindal kicked off the parade shaking hands and posing for selfies. He was scheduled to appear at another parade in the area later in the day. He has been campaigning in the kickoff caucus state since Tuesday. *Presidential hopefuls discuss patriotism on July 4th <http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/07/04/united-states-presidential-candidates-patriotism-july-fourth/29688615/> // Des Moines Register – July 4, 2015* Contenders for the nation's highest office are once again crisscrossing Iowa, the state that kicks off presidential voting. Often, they speak of their love of country. In honor of this Fourth of July weekend, The Des Moines Register asked each of them: How in your life have you best demonstrated patriotism? DEMOCRATS Lincoln Chafee Former governor and U.S. senator from Rhode Island "Patriots are those who love their country. We have a country that is special — God shed its grace on thee, from sea to shining sea. I have spent three decades in public service because I want to do my small part to keep America strong and beautiful. I am proud of my record on protecting our water, air and land, on defending our constitutional liberties, on voting against the Iraq war, and on supporting programs that help build the middle class. We are fortunate to be Americans. Happy July Fourth!" Hillary Clinton Former U.S. secretary of state, former U.S. senator from New York "I have never felt more patriotic than standing with our first responders in the aftermath of 9/11. The thick smoke made it hard to breathe or see, but the brave rescuers never wavered. They made me so proud to be an American, and inspired me to do everything I could as their senator to support them and rebuild. Tragically, many of our first responders suffered lasting health effects from their service at Ground Zero, and I spent years working with both parties until they got care. They represent America at its best, and they deserve the best from us." Martin O'Malley Former governor of Maryland "We demonstrate patriotism through the care and compassion we show to one another as Americans. In my life, that has taken on the form of service to others — especially the most vulnerable and voiceless among us: the poor, the sick, the homeless, the hungry and the imprisoned. That service has also called me to be present, again and again, when our most courageous and patriotic families have lost a family member who died serving the rest of us." Jim Webb Former U.S. senator from Virginia Editor's note: Webb was a combat Marine in Vietnam, awarded the Navy Cross, the Silver Star Medal, two Bronze Star Medals and two Purple Hearts; an assistant secretary of defense; and the secretary of the Navy. His campaign submitted this seal for his response: REPUBLICANS Jeb Bush Former governor of Florida "The Fourth of July is the perfect time to not only celebrate our independence but to reflect on and thank those defending our freedom today. As governor of Florida, I had the honor of serving as commander in chief of the Florida National Guard. Daily, I was inspired by patriotism and sacrifice of our men and women in uniform. Whether serving overseas in war or responding to the eight hurricanes that battered the Sunshine State in just 16 months, Florida's national guardsmen exemplified the values of all the men and women who have committed to serving in our armed forces." Ben Carson Retired neurosurgeon "I am humbled before God and before the courage and leadership of our Founding Fathers. These are the touchstones and the guiding light of my faith and patriotic values. Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, Nathan Hale; they represent the very essence of patriotism, defined by their selfless duty and service to their countrymen, and the generations that have followed. Long ago, I accepted their baton of service to my fellow man as my calling in life, as a care provider for children and as an advocate for the principles of our Constitution." Chris Christie Governor of New Jersey "The brave men and women who have worn our nation's uniform have courageously and selflessly served to uphold the democratic principles that as Americans we hold so dear. At the same time, we must remember the families of those who made the ultimate sacrifice and did not come home. I am honored to be governor of a state with so many heroic and honorable men and women who have served with distinction. We are forever grateful for their service, today and every day." Ted Cruz U.S. senator from Texas "My father came to America from Cuba in 1957. He had little money, and spoke little English. My Irish-Italian mother was the daughter of working-class parents. Both my parents worked hard. In a single generation, their son became a United States senator, and now I am running for president. That could only happen in America. These stories demonstrate how America is the land of limitless opportunity. I ask myself, 'What have I done today to ensure that same opportunity exists for future generations?' We're an exceptional nation, and it is up to each of us to keep it that way." Carly Fiorina Former CEO of Hewlett-Packard "Ours was intended to be a citizen government, so when citizens volunteer our time and talent to make our country, our government and our politics better, we exhibit patriotism. I have continued to make this a priority, acting as a volunteer chair of two large charities dedicated to improving our communities. I have volunteered my time to help good candidates run for political office — and I have even volunteered more directly to improve our government, serving as an adviser for the departments of State, Defense and Homeland Security as well as for the CIA and (National Security Agency)." Lindsey Graham U.S. senator from South Carolina "I was honored to be an Air Force officer serving on active duty, in the Guard, and in the Reserves for 33 years. Being part of a military unit that is focused on the mission and not on individual differences was a great inspiration and taught me what true patriotism is all about." Mike Huckabee Former governor of Arkansas "When I was asked how I demonstrate patriotism, I considered all the ways I try to convey my love and gratitude for this truly exceptional nation, where a poor kid from Arkansas can someday become governor. But then I remembered JFK: 'Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.' And I realized that what perfectly demonstrates pure, selfless patriotism are those who love this country so much they offer their lives to preserve its freedoms and opportunities for us all: the heroic men and women of the United States military. " Bobby Jindal Governor of Louisiana "My parents came to chase the American dream and they caught it, they've lived it. I simply want my children and one day my grandchildren to be able to live that same American dream. I want all of our children to have those opportunities, so I'm incredibly grateful for the opportunities that America has afforded my family. I want those opportunities to continue. One of the ways I can show my gratitude for what this country has done for me is fight with everything I've got to make sure those opportunities continue to exist for the next generation." John Kasich Governor of Ohio "Patriotism means you don't take a pass on dealing with problems where you live. Far too many officials fear taking on big challenges, and as a result, nothing gets done and problems worsen. Throughout my public career both in Congress and as governor, I have taken on the challenges of the day in the belief that big ideas drive success and generate excitement. Are they risky? Do they aggravate some people? Sometimes. But, if you're not doing that, you're not doing your job, and a strong agenda of ideas is not only what people want — it's what our nation needs." Rick Perry Former governor of Texas "Patriots put their country first, alongside faith and family. I had the honor of wearing America's uniform, defending freedom as an Air Force officer and aircraft commander. I inherited my love and sense of duty for my country from my father, a WWII B-17 tail gunner. Patriots work 365 days a year, not just on July 4. Providing for our heroes and their families is a sacred duty I take extreme pride in executing. As governor, we took important steps to expand our commitment to our nation's heroes. As commander in chief, it would remain one of my highest priorities." Marco Rubio U.S. senator from Florida "One way I exercise patriotism is by teaching my kids what America means to me on a personal level. In school and from our entertainment culture, children rarely receive a meaningful explanation of the principles and ideals that set America apart from every other nation. I teach my children that they, like me, owe a debt to America, for it is the nation that changed our family's history. I believe these conversations are important, for if our children believe America is just an ordinary country, they will not be willing to go to extraordinary lengths to extend her promise." Rand Paul U.S. senator from Kentucky "To me, patriotism means giving back to your community. Whether it is volunteering at the local food shelter, tutoring struggling students, singing in the church choir, or the most selfless act of all, serving in our military to protect our nation and our American values. As a physician, I have an obligation to help those in need. I am honored to have the opportunity to perform free sight-restoring eye surgeries for lower-income families in my home state. There is nothing more rewarding than using my skills as an ophthalmologist to give back — to find the problem and diagnose the solution." Rick Santorum Former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania "The moment in my life I gave the most for my country was not when I ran for Congress, not when I ran for the Senate, and not when I decided to run for president. The moment I most committed myself to my country was the day my son Daniel came to me and said he wanted to join the Air Force. I cannot give more to my country than one of my own." Donald Trump Businessman "Our country has a sacred duty to care for veterans and their families. One of the greatest gifts of my success is being able to honor veterans. I sit on the board of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, which helps find jobs for veterans. One of my proudest accomplishments: In 1995, on the 50th anniversary of World War II, only 100 spectators watched New York City's parade. It was an insult. I agreed to lead a second parade that year. I made a $1 million matching donation to finance the parade. Over 1.4 million watched; more than 25,000 veterans participated." Scott Walker Governor of Wisconsin "My family lived in Plainfield, Iowa, from 1970 to 1977. Right around the time of our nation's bicentennial, I noticed that there was no state flag at our City Hall. That inspired me and my brother to go around town with an old mayonnaise jar and collect enough money to purchase an Iowa flag to fly at City Hall. My mom still has a picture of my brother David and me holding the flag, with smiles on our faces." Editor's note: Campaigns for George Pataki and Bernie Sanders either declined to provide a statement or did not respond to requests to do so. Candidates were asked to submit statements of 100 words or fewer. Longer responses were edited to that length. *Candidates do holiday march through New Hampshire <http://onpolitics.usatoday.com/2015/07/04/candidates-do-holiday-march-through-new-hampshire/> // USA Today // David Jackson – July 4, 2015* AMHERST, N.H. — Ah, the Fourth of July in New Hampshire: parades, picnics, pyrotechnics and — and every four years — presidential candidates. Republicans and Democrats marched up and down New Hampshire on Saturday’s holiday, seeking to build support and goodwill seven months before the Granite State holds the first presidential primaries of the 2016 campaign. “It’s great to be in New Hampshire!” former Florida governor Jeb Bush told a crowd in Amherst, N.H., at its traditional July 4 parade. Former Texas governor Rick Perry and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, both Republicans, also marched in Amherst. Other campaigns, Democratic as well as Republican, sponsored marchers in the parade that began at an elementary school staging area and wound its way to a village green filled with families, musicians and games of chance. As is tradition, the candidates walked at the back of the parade, behind exhibits that included a truck carrying a Pop Warner football team, Shriners in tiny red Corvettes, Civil War re-enactors dressed in Union blue, high school bands, a kayak club, a clown car, at least one small horse-drawn carriage and bagpipers blaring Amazing Grace and other tunes. Graham noted to supporters that he was at least first in the parade line among the politicians. “This is a good omen,” he said. “It means everybody else should drop out, except me.” At one point on the parade route, Bush — the son of one president and the brother of another — walked up to a man wearing a red T-shirt that said: “Bush Hat Trick.” “I told you it’d work,” the man told family and friends as the candidate seeking to be the third Bush president strode up. “Where’d you get that shirt?” Bush said as photographers and supporters converged. Bush later marched in another parade in nearby Merrimack. Throughout the parade in Amherst, the candidates shook hands, held babies, posed for selfies and signed campaign placards. At one point, Bush signed the cast of a woman who had injured her leg playing soccer. The two discussed Sunday’s U.S.-Japan Women’s World Cup final, each predicting an American victory. Two other Republican candidates — Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie — walked in the traditional parade in Wolfeboro, N.H. Both Rubio and Christie spent time this weekend at the nearby home of Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee. Democratic presidential candidates also partook in July Fourth festivities in both New Hampshire and Iowa, where caucuses will be the first nomination contests of 2016. Former secretary of State Hillary Clinton marched in a parade in Gorham, N.H., after a local visit to a Mountain Fire Pizza. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley spent the holiday in Iowa. Sanders, who is moving up in polls against the heavily favored Clinton, walked in parades in Creston and Waukee. O’Malley, who has been in Iowa promoting his climate change plan, marched in the July Fourth parade in aptly named Independence, Iowa, before hitting the barbecue circuit in Dubuque and Clinton. Another Democratic candidate, former Rhode Island governor Lincoln Chafee, spent Saturday at the parades in Amherst and Merrimack, N.H. Surveying the scene in Amherst, as residents hung bunting or positioned lawn chairs in front of white clapboard houses, Chafee said: “It’s Americana, isn’t it?” *OPINIONS/EDITORIALS/BLOGS* *Wirthman: Hillary Clinton's everyday feminism <http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_28422063/hillary-clintons-everyday-feminism> // The Denver Post // Lisa Wirthman – July 4, 2015* Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign is a manifesto for everyday feminism, both in Colorado and the nation. And that's a good thing. It's long past time to air out our deep-seated gender issues and redefine what it means to be a woman. For decades, women have tried to fit into a world standardized around men. In her 2008 presidential campaign, Clinton said she wasn't running as a woman, but as a great candidate. For 2016, she's wholeheartedly embraced the fact that she can be both. Fueled by social media and a progressive cultural environment, feminism has never been more popular — or more populist. And that's a good thing, too. The economy is stronger when more women are involved, not just a token few. This is not because women are inherently better than men, but because diversity of thought and experience is better than a narrow view. Colorado is a top state for women's workforce participation, which overall added $2 trillion to the U.S. economy since the 1970s. Yet women hold only 7 percent of top corporate positions in Colorado. In the 2016 presidential race, women are a majority of registered voters in Colorado, and a widening gender gap could tip the scales. Single white women — along with Hispanics, young voters, and working-class white men — are likely swing votes in the election. Clinton launched her campaign in June with a reference to her historic candidacy, calling her outdoor rally on New York's Roosevelt Island "a place with absolutely no ceilings." To break those glass ceilings, women in Clinton's generation often had to work twice as hard as their male colleagues to earn half as much money — all while dealing with rampant sexism. While these glass breakers are celebrated for their firsts, however, they're also criticized by younger feminists for being the only members of a small and exclusive group. In 2016, feminism's greatest challenge is that women must not only be equal to men, but to each other as well. From the start, the banner of feminism has been held primarily by white women privileged with the education and opportunity to reach the glass ceiling — and make those initial cracks. But women's suffrage also has strong ties to social justice. In Colorado, suffragists argued that female voters would address the needs of working people who were ignored by mainstream politicians, according to the Women of the West Museum. Today, young women are quick to point out that so-called corporate feminists rarely represent the intersection of race, class, gender, and sexual orientation that creates a multilayered experience for many women. The issue of equal pay, which Clinton referenced in her kick-off speech, is a good example of that intersection. While women in Colorado make 77.9 cents for every dollar earned by men, African- American women make 67.5 cents on that same dollar, and Hispanic women make just 52.5 cents. If Clinton captures women's votes in 2016, it won't be simply because of her gender, but also because she convinces women of all backgrounds and experiences that she's willing and able to flip America's patriarchy on its head. So far, she seems to understand the challenge. Clinton's "Fighter" campaign video highlights her 1995 visit to Beijing, where she told the U.N. Conference on Women: "Human rights are women's rights and women's rights are human rights, once and for all." It was one of Clinton's most iconic feminist moments — and a part of her résumé that clearly illustrates her willingness to fight for all women and girls. Clinton established herself as a fighter again in her kickoff speech, in which she outlined her plan to restore equity to the middle class. And she's planted her feet firmly at the intersection of gender, class, race and sexual orientation in solidarity with women who see feminism as just one facet of a more complex identity. Clinton is impassioned on racial issues. After the shooting of nine people in a black church in Charleston, S.C., she told the U.S. Conference of Mayors: "Despite our best efforts and our highest hopes, America's long struggle with race is far from finished." She strongly supported the Supreme Court's decision to legalize gay marriage in all 50 states. "Love triumphed in the highest court in our land," Clinton told supporters. "Equality triumphed." And she includes men in feminism's promise of equal opportunity by framing universal preschool and child care, paid sick days and family leave, and affordable college as family issues that impact both genders. It's a timely message: In Colorado, more than 6o percent of children under the age of 6 live in households where all parents work. Of course, female leadership is no guarantee for passing family-friendly legislation. Colorado has the highest percent of female legislators of any state, and an all-female leadership team in the house. But with Republicans controlling the state Senate, Democrats were unable to pass bills to create a family and medical leave insurance program, raise the minimum wage, or make it easier for middle-class families to save for college. Clinton would face a similarly tough battle. But it's these populist elements of her campaign that may give her the chance to fight it. Clinton's everyday feminism is also a contrast to the more individualized brand of feminism promoted by GOP candidate and former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, who recently visited Colorado. In a campaign speech, Fiorina said a feminist is "a woman who lives the life she chooses." Unfortunately, that definition only includes women who have the opportunity to make choices. Eventually, the GOP's male candidates will need to join this conversation. And that's a good thing, too. Because while over 80 percent of Americans say they believe in full gender equality, only one-fifth identify themselves as feminists — or people who believe all men and women should have equal opportunities. Back in 2007, Clinton's gender-neutral campaign created strong debate among feminists. "Do liberated women want to join the clubhouse or do we want to burn it down?" asked a columnist for The Nation. The answer is neither. Feminism's goal is not to enable women to succeed in a man's world, nor to attack the success of men. Rather, it requires an entirely new paradigm, where success is no longer defined by male experiences, and all human beings have equal opportunities to succeed. By putting her gender at center stage in 2016, Clinton may finally clarify the conversation — and help voters realize our shared belief in gender equality makes us all feminists at heart. *Editorial: Hillary Clinton’s emails erode transparency claim <http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/editorials/2015/07/04/hillary-clintons-emails-erode-transparency-claim/29709447/> // The Des Moines Register – July 4, 2015* A thistle to former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, who claimed in March that she had turned over to the State Department all relevant work emails from her private server, and that she had never used her private account to exchange classified information. Last week, the State Department acknowledged that Clinton didn’t turn over at least 15 emails that are now the subject of controversy. It also said portions of 25 emails it was releasing are being kept confidential and “upgraded” to classified status. As a presidential candidate, Clinton is turning press avoidance into something of an art form, yet she once called herself “probably the most transparent person in public life.” It’s a claim that becomes less believable with each passing day. *Fair pay for hard work is not just happy talk <http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2015/07/05/1-fair-pay-for-hard-work-is-not-just-happy-talk.html> // The Columbus Dispatch // E.J. Dionne – July 5, 2015* Central to our national self-understanding is the idea that hard work pays off. Americans have always tolerated rather high levels of inequality, as long as most people had a chance to rise. Thus was Chris Christie’s opening tribute to his hardworking parents and grandparents the most affecting part of his announcement on Tuesday that he is seeking the Republican presidential nomination. The New Jersey governor bestowed praise across gender lines, describing his grandmothers as women “who knew how to work and who knew that hard work would deliver something for their children.” This section of Christie’s speech got little attention. But work, its rewards and its discontents, will be central to our nation’s debate going into the 2016 campaign. And President Barack Obama has laid down a marker for testing how seriously politicians take the obligation to make hard work pay. Obama is putting forward new rules that would make up to 5 million more American workers eligible for overtime pay. He’s doing this by ending a scam through which employers designate even relatively low-paid workers as managers to get around the law, which requires an overtime premium after 40 hours per week. Under the current rules, as Obama wrote earlier this week in the Huffington Post, workers earning as little as $23,660 a year can be robbed of overtime by being given supervisory or managerial designations. The new regulation would raise the threshold to a more-plausible $50,440 a year. Not surprisingly, some firms immediately announced they would find ways of evading the rule, warning of shorter hours and fewer jobs. But there are always people in business — not everyone — who react this way to any effort to improve the bargaining position or compensation of employees. Remember all those warnings that the Affordable Care Act would be a “job killer”? Funny how we seem to have added well over 12 million new private-sector jobs since Obamacare passed in March 2010. And avoiding overtime is not the only way in which employers are trying to cut the compensation they offer workers. This week, The Wall Street Journal’s Lauren Weber reported on how businesses are “setting up workers as franchisees or owners of limited liability companies” to “shield” themselves “from tax and labor statutes.” My Washington Post colleague Catherine Rampell also has documented “the shifting of risk off corporate balance sheets and onto the shoulders of individual Americans.” In discussing rising inequality, we often act as if the trend is a natural development about which we can do nothing. Of course there are big economic forces at work. But government rules and laws — on pay, health care, labor rights and taxes — can improve the standing of workers or they can make the disparities worse. Government has a choice, and there is no purely neutral ground on this question. And this is why Christie’s lovely tribute to work and family needs to be examined as something more than a sentiment from a greeting card. In the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling on same-sex marriage, what are typically referred to as “values issues” quickly rose to the forefront of the argument in the Republican presidential primary and next year’s election. But no values issue is more relevant to more Americans (across the boundaries of sexual orientation, gender and race) than whether the hard work that politicians extol pays off in the ways they claim it should. In a very crowded Republican presidential field, will any candidate find it in his or her interest to break with the party’s orthodoxy on government regulations and labor rights? Will any of them have the temerity to appeal to their party’s many working-class supporters by making the point that Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and other Democrats are sure to advance: that reinforcing our “conservative” values about the honor of work often requires what are usually seen as “progressive” measures by government to keep workers from being shortchanged? “One of the things my mother used to say all the time,” Christie declared on Tuesday, “was, ‘Christopher, if you work hard enough, you can be anything.’” That is precisely the promise that our politicians should be working harder to vindicate. *Hillary Clinton takes the knocks but keeps on trucking <http://www.smh.com.au/comment/hillary-clinton-takes-the-knocks-but-keeps-on-trucking-20150704-gi4jz5.html> // Sydney Morning Herald // Annabel Crabb – July 4, 2015* I cannot be the only carbon-based life form on Earth who fell a little bit in love with Hillary Clinton when it was revealed on Wednesday that she cannot use a fax machine. And not in an adorable, Gen-Y, "what is a fax machine, old person with kind eyes?" way either. No, Hillary Clinton – a woman in her late sixties whose professional career has witnessed the fax machine's entire trajectory from infancy to ascendancy and thence to redundancy – cannot use a fax machine because they are just stupid and annoying and it's not her fault. Clinton's refreshing fax-fail was revealed in the blizzard of her private emails released last week for reasons only trainspotters can now readily recall. Her exchange with aide Huma Abedin (a woman who - being married to serial social media willy-waver Anthony Wiener - has ample cause to distrust any image-based form of electronic communication) occurred in December 2009 and carries the subject line: "Can you hang up the fax line, they will call again and try fax". HC: I thought it was supposed to be off hook to work? HA: Yes but hang up one more time. So they can re-establish the line. HC: I did. HA: Just pick up phone and hang it up. And leave it hung up. HC: I've done it twice now. I like political leaders to be good at their jobs wherever possible, but that's not to say a tiny part of me doesn't rejoice when they fail at basic tasks. And the ancillary revelation that Mrs Clinton didn't know what the diplomatic "E3+3" grouping was, even when she was the senior US representative on it, also reassures me as to her fundamental humanity. "What is the E and who are the three?" a mystified Clinton emailed her adviser Jake Sullivan in 2009. JS: E is Europe. E3 is UK, France and Germany. +3 is US, China, Russia. So it's the same 6 as P5+1, just a different name. HC: I already feel safer. Hillary Clinton has been in and out of – or spousally proximate to – public office in America for thirty-six years now. And in that time, America has lived through a lot with that lady. It's praised her, despised her, turned its nose up at her 1993 health reforms, felt sorry for her when Bill went out tomcatting, harboured suspicions about her motivations, opted for the other guy in 2008, paid her out for her scrunchies and pantsuits, snoozed through her recent memoir, and next year Americans will all get together (or at least the 57 per cent of them who bother to vote will; the rest will heckle from the couch) to cast a final judgment on her. This is a person who just keeps on trucking. Not much is handed to her. The mounting-yard of opponents to her presidential run grows both more populous and more ludicrous by the day; there are nearly 20 declared candidates now. On Thursday, New Jersey Republican Governor Chris Christie announced he too would be running. This is a guy best-known for intentionally causing large traffic jams for base political purposes, so the scale of his optimism here is fairly impressive; half of the Republican Party, it seems, thinks they have a shot against Mrs Clinton. It's not that the bread always falls butter-side-down for the former First Lady; she has had a privileged life, and many opportunities, and people will pay her several hundred thousand dollars just to turn up and make a speech, which is more than you can say for most people who've missed out on big jobs or been cheated on by their husbands. But it's interesting to consider what all the loudly-proclaimed recent triumphs of the Obama administration - the Supreme Court backing Obamacare and declaring gay marriage to be legal across the USA, Obama's congressional win on the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade deal and so on – will mean for a campaigning Hillary Clinton. Imagine the handover letter from the departing President Obama: "Hi Hill! Couple of housekeeping things. You're welcome to everything in the garden. Don't hang around near any lighted White House windows at night. And sorry about the dog hair. On policy: I've done health care reform, and it seems to be sticking. (You're welcome!) I've introduced gay marriage, pretty much, so look out for angry religious types. Also gun owners, because I've promised we're going to do something about that stuff. I'm sure you'll do a super job of taking guns off people. Plus I've pledged some pretty stiff carbon emission cuts, which the Republicans hate. And I've legislated that free trade deal, which our party hates. You'll muddle through, I'm sure. Let's see, what else – oh yeah. I've opened an embassy in communist Cuba. Enjoy! And don't hesitate to fax me if you need anything. Barack." *Emotional decisions and Hillary Clinton's presidential bid (Your letters) <http://www.syracuse.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/07/emotional_decisions_and_hillary_clintons_presidential_bid_your_letters.html> // Syracuse // Max Malikow – July 4, 2015* To the Editor: Separated by over two centuries, David Hume, a philosopher, and Jonathan Haidt, a psychologist, have said decision-making tends to be emotionally driven. Both have written of the human tendency to begin decision making with a conclusion derived from feelings followed by the intellectual work of justifying the conclusion. I'm not exempt from this proclivity, but I am aware of it and resist it. Concerning the current presidential campaign and Hillary Clinton's candidacy, I submit there is nothing in her resume to support the belief that she is qualified to serve as president of the United States. An eight-year stint as first lady, an uneventful tenure as a senator, and accumulating frequent flier miles as secretary of state have not prepared her for the oval office. Moreover, being a woman is hardly a credential for the presidency. In the 1960 presidential campaign John Kennedy addressed the possibility of being the first Catholic president: "I hope that no American, considering the really critical issues facing this country today, will waste his franchise and throw away his vote, by voting either for me or against me because of my religious affiliation. It is not relevant." I doubt Mrs. Clinton will address her status as a woman seeking the presidency by saying, "It is not relevant." I also doubt what I've written here will have the slightest effect on anyone who is emotionally committed to Hillary Clinton - and there are many. So I brace myself for her nomination, election, and presidency. Max Malikow, Syracuse *TOP NEWS* *DOMESTIC* *Gay rights activists in Philadelphia mark landmark march from 1965 <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gay-rights-activists-in-philadelphia-mark-landmark-march-from-1965/2015/07/04/fafaff22-22a7-11e5-84d5-eb37ee8eaa61_story.html> // WaPo // Natalie Pompilio – July 4, 2015* PHILADELPHIA — Gay rights activists gathered in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia on the Fourth of July to mark the progress of their movement and pay tribute to those who launched it a half-century ago — but also made it clear that the fight for equality was far from over. “In too many communities, you can still get married on Sunday and then fired on Monday. Marriage equality was a critical milestone but not the final destination,” said activist Aisha Moodie-Mills, referring to the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriages nationwide. “If history has taught us anything, it’s that no community’s rights are one and done with a simple piece of legislation,” Moodie-Mills said. “Equality is not set in stone.” The event was part of a weekend-long celebration of some of the earliest gay rights marches, including a gathering of about 40 protesters calling for equality at the same location on July 5, 1965. Organizers called that demonstration an incredibly bold and courageous move by the standards of the day, when homosexuals were legally barred from government jobs and could be arrested for engaging in consensual intimate acts even in the privacy of their own homes. The American Psychiatric Association classified being gay as a disease that could be treated with chemical castration or lobotomy. “Fifty years ago, America perceived us as degenerates,” said Malcolm Lazin, who organized the anniversary events. “One of the many goals of the gay pioneers was to demonstrate that we are first-class American citizens.” One way they did that in 1965 was with a dress code for the picketers: suits for men, dresses and pantyhose for women. The marchers were silent, holding hand-lettered signs calling for fair treatment. During Saturday’s ceremony, a group of 40 people re-created that march, walking in a circle on the cobblestone street in front of the building where both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were signed. The event also paid special tribute to the “mother and father of the gay rights movement,” as Lazin described them: activists Barbara Gittings and Frank Kameny. Other notables included Edie Windsor, the plaintiff in the 2013 Supreme Court case that struck down parts of the Defense of Marriage Act; Judy and Dennis Shepard, whose son Matthew was killed in 1998 because of his sexual orientation; the Rev. Gene Robinson, the first openly gay priest in the Episcopal Church; and Walter Naegle, long-time partner of civil rights activist Bayard Rustin, a confidant of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. Entertainer Wanda Sykes, who hosted the event, joked that she was now “a happily married woman in all 50 states, but I’m not sure I’m going to go test the water in all 50 states. I’ll let them get a little bit used to it first.” Jim Obergefell, who was listed as the lead plaintiff in the successful lawsuit that led the Supreme Court to legalize same-sex marriage, was stopped after his remarks by South Jersey resident Jim Mancinelli, 64, and his partner of 15 years, Dave Helgeson, 52. “Thank you so much. I really appreciate what you did for all of us, the strength you showed for all of us, the courage you showed for all of us,” Mancinelli said, gesturing between himself and Helgeson as his eyes filled with tears. Obergefell, too, was emotional as he replied, “I loved my husband,” who died in 2013. “It was the easiest thing in the world to do.” *Fatal shooting in San Francisco ignites immigration policy debate <http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-0705-sf-shooting-20150705-story.html#page=1> // LA Times // Louis Sahagun and Emily Alpert Reyes – July 4, 2015* San Francisco and its liberal policy toward people in the U.S. illegally were thrust into the national political debate this weekend after the fatal shooting of a woman at a popular tourist destination, allegedly by a man with a criminal record who had been deported to Mexico several times. The Board of Supervisors adopted a law in 2013 that limited the conditions under which those arrested could be placed in federal immigration holds. Since then, dozens of cities and counties across the country have stopped complying with immigration "detainer" requests after a federal judge ruled that an Oregon county violated one woman's 4th Amendment rights by holding her for immigration authorities without probable cause. The San Francisco law allows holds only for people with violent records. The suspect in the shooting, Francisco Sanchez, 45, had several felonies but no major violent crime conviction in recent years, according to the San Francisco Sheriff's Department. On March 26, Sanchez was booked into the San Francisco County Jail on a 10-year-old drug-related warrant. The following day, local charges against Sanchez were dismissed in San Francisco County Superior Court. Despite his undocumented status, Sanchez was released from custody after the Sheriff's Department confirmed that he had no active warrants and had completed a federal prison sentence on separate charges, officials said. San Francisco's ordinance made Sanchez ineligible for a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement hold because he did not have "a violent felony conviction within the last seven years, or a probable cause for holding issued by a magistrate or judge on a current violent felony," said Freya Horne, an attorney for the San Francisco Sheriff's Department. "Nothing in his background showed anything like that." Sanchez was freed even though ICE sought to hold him for deportation, said Virginia Kice, a spokeswoman for the federal agency. "An individual with a lengthy criminal history, who is now the suspect in a tragic murder case, was released onto the street rather than being turned over to ICE for deportation," Kice said. "We're not asking local cops to do our job. All we're asking is that they notify us when a serious foreign national criminal offender is being released to the street so we can arrange to take custody." The San Francisco Sheriff's Department announced last year that it would only honor such requests if a judge had vetted them or a warrant was obtained. San Francisco County Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi said Kice misses the point. "ICE was informed about San Francisco's position on detainers," he said, "but did not seek a court order for Sanchez's transfer as required under the law." "That's all they had to do," he said. "Get a court order and we'd be happy to honor it." Sanchez was arrested Wednesday after police responded to reports of a shooting on Pier 14 near the Embarcadero and Mission Street. Police found Kathryn Steinle, 32, with a fatal gunshot wound to her upper body. After she fell to the ground, Steinle, who had recently moved to San Francisco, reportedly kept saying, "Dad, help me, help me." She was transported to a local hospital, where she was pronounced dead. The motive for the shooting remains under investigation, but police believe it was a random attack. An hour later, working on tips provided by witnesses, authorities arrested Sanchez, who has seven felony convictions and has been deported five times, most recently in 2009, authorities said. Four of his convictions involved narcotics charges. In 1989, San Francisco passed the "city and county of refuge" ordinance that barred city money from being used to enforce immigration law and prohibited authorities from stopping people based solely on their immigration status or country of origin. The city has since expanded its sanctuary policies. The original ordinance grew out of the sanctuary movement of the 1980s, when churches across the country provided refuge to Central Americans fleeing civil strife in their homelands. Since then, hundreds of cities and counties across the country have adopted "sanctuary" laws or policies, most recently in response to immigration raids that have torn thousands of families apart. Civil rights organizations argue that ICE's detention requests are unconstitutional under the 4th Amendment because they are not based on any finding of probable cause. Angela Chan, senior staff attorney for Asian Americans Advancing Justice — Asian Law Caucus, pointed out that many law enforcement agencies, including the Los Angeles Police Department, decided to reexamine their practices after a 2014 federal ruling determined that an Oregon county was liable for damages after holding an inmate beyond her release date so she could be transferred to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. "Nationally, over 320 jurisdictions do not respond to ICE holds because they violate the 4th Amendment of the Constitution," Chan said. In San Francisco, "even if the sheriff had a policy of responding to ICE holds, if he'd respond he would be liable. He'd be sued." It's not the first time San Francisco has found itself at the center of an immigration controversy. In 2008, then-Mayor Gavin Newsom was the target of criticism over the city's policy of shielding convicted juvenile offenders who were in the country illegally from federal authorities, either escorting them to their home countries at city expense or transporting them to group homes, often outside the city. Newsom, who was positioning himself to run for governor at the time, said the city had stopped the practice. But news reports that eight young drug dealers in the country illegally from Honduras who were convicted in San Francisco walked away from unguarded facilities in San Bernardino County created an uproar. The case against Sanchez became a divisive political campaign topic Friday after Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, who has come under blistering criticism for comments about Mexican immigrants, described it as "a senseless and totally preventable violent act committed by an illegal immigrant." Immigrant rights groups say the San Francisco tragedy is being exploited politically to promote practices that have already been called into question in federal courts. "Unfortunately, some will utilize this tragic, senseless death to try to impose immigration policies, city policies that are archaic and that are more harmful to the community than they are good," said Jorge-Maria Cabrera, a spokesman for the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles. Activists pushing for stricter enforcement of immigration laws disagree. "If you can't deport an illegal immigrant who has been deported five times and is guilty of seven felonies, then who exactly is deportable?" asked Joe Guzzardi, national media director of Californians for Population Stabilization. *INTERNATIONAL* *Day of Reckoning for Greek Banks and Eurozone’s Central Banker <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/06/business/international/day-of-reckoning-for-greek-banks-and-eurozones-central-banker.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news> // NYT // Jacl Ewing & James Kanter – July 5, 2015* FRANKFURT — No matter which way the Greek vote goes, the European Central Bank on Monday will face a series of agonizing decisions. Greece’s future in the eurozone may well depend on how far the central bank is willing to go to prop up struggling Greek banks and prevent a total economic collapse. If Greeks vote yes — agreeing to accept unpopular dictates from other eurozone nations and international creditors in return for more aid — the central bank would have a much easier time justifying emergency loans and other steps to keep the banks from failing. No economy can function properly without banks; if they topple, so will the economy. But if Greeks vote no, Mario Draghi, the president of the E.C.B., may be confronted with a difficult choice. The central bank’s rules would probably require it to stop providing cash to Greek banks. But Mr. Draghi might be tempted to find a way around those rules, because choking off financial support would thrust untold hardship upon ordinary Greeks and might send the country on its way out of the euro currency union. Either way the situation is tricky, and there are no precedents to rely on. “It’s fair to say we can expect a few surprises in the next few days,” said Nicolas Véron, a senior fellow at Bruegel, a research organization in Brussels. “Clearly, we are in uncharted territory.” The E.C.B.’s Governing Council is expected to hold a conference call Monday to discuss Greek banks in light of the election results. If Greeks vote no — rejecting further austerity measures, even though that could mean no further bailout help — the central bank might focus its energy on minimizing the collateral damage elsewhere in the 19-nation eurozone. One way to do that would be to pump money into the bloc’s economy by stepping up the central bank’s purchase of government bonds, and other debt, from other eurozone countries. But for Greece, its banks pose the clearest immediate danger. For months, they have depended on the E.C.B.’s emergency loans to compensate for withdrawals of money by Greeks who are worried that their government would be unable to reach a bailout agreement with its creditors. The extent of that dependency became clear last week after the central bank decided to cap the emergency loans at about 89 billion euros, or about $99 billion. Because much of that credit line had already been used, the borrowing cap forced the government to close the banks before they ran completely out of money. Under central bank rules, no emergency loans may be made to insolvent banks. If Greeks vote no, it will be hard for Mr. Draghi and the Governing Council to maintain the pretense that Greek banks are solvent. For one thing, the banks have large holdings of Greek government bonds, which have already plunged in value and would probably fall further. Mujtaba Rahman, the Europe director for the Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy, wrote in a briefing note on Friday that a no vote by Greeks would probably tilt the balance of opinion on the Governing Council in favor of members from Germany, Latvia and other eurozone countries that want to take a hard line with Greece. But the E.C.B. is treading carefully. It does not want to take the blame for any economic or humanitarian chaos that might ensue if Greek citizens choose to reject a deal with creditors. Even if Greeks vote yes, banks may not reopen Tuesday as the government has promised. The banks have only about €1 billion, or $1.1 million, on hand, Louka Katseli, the head of Greece’s banking association, said on Friday. But a yes vote would improve the chances that Greece could negotiate a new aid package with the other eurozone countries and its other main creditor, the International Monetary Fund. Those prospects could make it easier for the E.C.B. to justify an increase in emergency lending, perhaps allowing the banks to reopen soon, or at least continue dispensing limited amounts of cash. (Since last Monday’s bank closure, the daily A.T.M. withdrawal limit for people with Greek bank cards has been €60, or about $67.) When the Greece government’s debt problems became evident during the financial crisis, leading to international bailouts of the country in 2010 and 2012, one big worry was that other European banks could be dragged down by losses on their Greek holdings. By now, though, as European banks have sold off their Greek investments and new eurozone banking regulations have been put in place, that risk has been greatly reduced, according to the European Banking Federation, an industry trade group. “European banks in recent years have significantly reduced their exposures to Greece, greatly limiting the risk of contagion through the banking system to other countries,” the British bank Barclays wrote in a briefing note on Friday. Barclays said that other euro countries had exposure to Greece amounting to only 3.5 percent of the eurozone’s gross domestic product and that exposure of European banks to Greece had fallen to less than one-tenth of that level. But Barclays warned that the safeguards put in place the last five years were not “infallible.” Even if the E.C.B. and other eurozone countries decide that Greece’s banks deserve a rescue, the process would be far from painless. The central bank’s emergency loans would not be a permanent solution. The longer-term fix would probably need to come from a war chest called the European Stability Mechanism that the eurozone countries set up during the financial crisis to guard against future calamities. That fund was used in 2012 and 2013 to lend €41 billion, or about $45.5 billion, to the Spanish government to help rebuild the assets of Spain’s banking system, which was teetering toward collapse. It was also used the next year to lend €9 billion, or about $10 billion, to Cyprus; some of those funds were used for its banks. In the case of Cyprus, there were howls of protest when a eurozone bank bailout for the first time required some depositors to take “haircuts,” or losses on their money. But two years later, as the new Cypriot government that came to power during the crisis had met the bailout conditions set by the eurozone and the I.M.F., that solution has been deemed largely successful. If a yes vote prevails in Greece, and the country — perhaps with a new government — can come to terms with its creditors, a Cyprus-style bank bailout might be part of the package. That is the view of Daniel Gros, the director of the Centre for European Policy Studies, a research organization in Brussels. “There would certainly have to be a quid pro quo,” Mr. Gros said, “and I’m almost certain that there would have to be some haircutting.” *Spurned by the West, Georgians look to Russia despite past quarrels <http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/despite-past-quarrels-with-russia-georgians-are-returning-to-its-orbit/2015/07/01/40d64c24-1b49-11e5-bed8-1093ee58dad0_story.html> // WaPo // Michael Birnbaum – July 4, 2015* TBILISI, Georgia — In this fiercely pro-Western nation that fought a brief war with Russia in 2008, few thought the Kremlin could ever regain a toehold. But with the West backing away from Georgia’s path to E.U. and NATO membership after a year of conflict in Ukraine, pro-Russian sentiments are on the rise. The former Soviet nation’s leaders are warning that Russia may yet prevail if Georgia is shut out from Western clubs. Wary of further provoking Russia, Western politicians have quashed talk of NATO and the European Union expanding eastward anytime soon. Russia has stepped into the vacuum, increasing its presence by opening Georgian-language outlets of its state-owned news network and deepening investments in the energy industry and other key sectors. Similar movements are happening in other former Eastern bloc nations trapped between Russia and the West, in a tug of war that has deep Cold War resonance. “Stability and security cannot be maintained with this paradigm, with Russia’s paradigm of having special rights towards other countries,” said Georgian President Giorgi Margvelashvili, in an interview in the presidential palace on a bluff overlooking the old city of Tbilisi. The blue-and-gold E.U. flag flies outside of the building, as it does at most Georgian governmental buildings, as an emblem of the nation’s aspirations. “Russia is working pretty actively, not only in Georgia, but all around the world” to expand its influence, he said. Despite the growing Russian presence, Georgia remains unshakably committed to eventual membership in NATO and the E.U., he said. As a token of its devotion, Georgia has sent more soldiers to Afghanistan to fight alongside U.S. troops in recent years than many nations already in NATO. The germ of the present conflict between Russia and the West lies in an E.U. offer of closer ties to Ukraine and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s infuriated reaction. E.U. membership for Ukraine was always a long shot — but it has become even less likely after fighting that has killed more than 6,400 people, according to U.N. estimates. E.U. leaders squabbled at a summit in May about whether to offer even the faintest prospects for membership to Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova, which have said they want to join. The E.U. leaders decided against it, and they also delayed plans to ease visa rules for Georgian travelers, a bitter disappointment for Georgia’s leaders. The E.U. caution stemmed from a desire not to inspire backlash from Russia, diplomats involved in the discussions say. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has taken the role of the lead European interlocutor with Putin, has played down expansion prospects. So has President Obama. “Neither Ukraine or Georgia are currently on a path to NATO membership. And there has not been any immediate plans for expansion of NATO’s membership,” Obama said last year. Now support for pro-Russian politicians in Moldova and Georgia is growing, while Ukraine is so consumed by conflict that it has made little progress in instituting overhauls necessary for westward integration. Armenia, a fourth post-Soviet country that had been in talks with E.U. leaders about a trade deal, last year abandoned the discussions altogether, allying itself with the Russian camp. Many here say that Russia has skillfully outmaneuvered the West. “The Russians are working to dominate this part of the world. They calculate, they plan and they know this region much better than the Europeans and Americans,” said Tedo Japaridze, the chairman of the Georgian Parliament’s foreign relations committee. The United States has tried to offer consolation measures. U.S. troops did training exercises with Georgian soldiers in May, and Georgia’s leaders present an upbeat face about their westward efforts. “We don’t have time to be disappointed,” said David Bakradze, the state minister on European and Euro-Atlantic Integration. “Our aspirations are irreversible.” But some Georgians feel they have little to show for their long westward push. Some of those sacrifices have been made in blood in grueling deployments to Afghanistan, where they have been one of the top contributors of soldiers to the battle efforts per capita, even though they are not NATO members. “More and more Georgians are feeling they haven’t gotten anything tangible from the West,” said Shorena Shaverdashvili, a prominent Georgian journalist. “There isn’t more love for Putin and Russia. It’s just a realization that we’re left face-to-face with Russia, and we have to deal with it.” Spurned by the West, Georgians are starting to look elsewhere. Support for signing the E.U. trade agreement was at 68 percent in April polls from the National Democratic Institute, down from 80 percent immediately before the Ukraine crisis started. Support for Georgia’s joining the Russian-dominated Eurasian Economic Union, meanwhile, is up to 31 percent. Part of the shift inside Georgia came with the ousting of President Mikheil Saakashvili, the Western-trained lawyer who ruled the country for a decade starting in 2003. Passionately anti-Russian and close to U.S. leaders, Saakashvili rarely missed a chance to jab at the Kremlin. The biggest eruption came in August 2008, when Georgian soldiers attacked Russian soldiers who were amassing in greater numbers on breakaway territories of Georgia. The ensuing five-day war decimated Georgia’s military and led to Russia’s recognizing the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. By 2012, many Georgians were ready to embrace the leadership of their nation’s wealthiest man, Bidzina Ivanishvili, who promised to improve relations with Russia while maintaining ties to the West. The payoff for Georgia was swift. Russia lifted a ban on imports of Georgian wine in 2013, and trade spiked. “Those people who are trying to help us, we just want to tell them, ‘Stop meddling with Russia,’ ” said Jemal Veliashvili, who works in a seed and fertilizer shop in Georgia’s Kakheti wine-growing region, in the green shadow of the Caucasus Mountains that form the border with Russia. He said his business had tripled since the ban was lifted. Even though diplomatic relations with the Kremlin remain tense, Russia’s presence inside Georgia is strengthening. Just last month, Russia’s Sputnik news agency opened new offices here and started a Georgian- and Russian-language Georgian news service. “Georgia should be neutral, and it should be militarily free,” said Archil Chkoidze, the leader of Georgia’s Eurasian Choice, a coalition of pro-Russian groups that says it has nearly 16,000 members. For now, even some of Georgia’s most committed pro-Western politicians say that their best hope is to hold tight to their goals but to expect little from their partners. “No one told us it was going to be easy,” said Irakli Alasania, the leader of the opposition Free Democrats. Alasania was defense minister until November, when he was ousted for being too pro-West, he says. The possibility of joining NATO “will only open up after Putin,” he said. Putin is widely expected to remain Russia’s leader until at least 2024. *Iran Nuclear Talks Appear to Advance as Deadline Nears <http://www.wsj.com/articles/iaea-chief-aims-to-report-on-irans-past-nuclear-work-this-year-1436007107> // WSJ // Jay Solomon & Laurence Norman – July 4, 2015* VIENNA—Key elements of a nuclear agreement between Iran and world powers appeared to be falling into place on Saturday, just ahead of a July 7 deadline, according to officials involved in negotiations in Austria’s capital. Still, senior American and Iranian diplomats stressed an elusive deal to end a 10-year standoff over Iran’s nuclear program was far from certain. But they said advances have been made in recent days on two of the thorniest issues confronting negotiators: the pace of sanctions relief for Iran and a United Nations investigation into charges that Tehran has secretly developed nuclear weapons technologies in recent decades. A nuclear deal is aimed at blocking Iran’s ability to move swiftly toward nuclear weapons in exchange for easing tight international sanctions. Besides the U.S., the group with which Iran has been negotiating includes Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China. Meanwhile, the head of the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog said on Saturday that he had agreed with Iran’s leadership to conclude an investigation into Tehran’s alleged suspected nuclear weapons work by the end of the year. “With the cooperation from Iran, I think we can issue a report by the end of the year on the assessment of the clarification of the issues related to possible military dimensions,” Yukiya Amano, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told reporters in Vienna shortly after returning from Iran. Tehran says its nuclear program has been conducted purely for civilian purposes. The IAEA has been seeking Iranian responses to 12 sets of questions it first raised in 2011 about Iran’s past nuclear work, based on evidence suggesting Iran may have been developing nuclear weapons technology. The IAEA says that despite promising closer cooperation in November 2013, Iran has so far only partially addressed two of those questions. The agency says that to date, Tehran has balked at requests to interview key Iranian scientists and to visit alleged nuclear sites. Negotiations continued in Vienna on Saturday despite the July 4 festivities in the U.S. The American Secretary of State John Kerry held a string of meetings on Saturday with his Iranian counterpart, Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, according to U.S. officials. And U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz was in negotiations with Iranian atomic energy agency chief Ali Akbar Salehi. Some other foreign ministers from the six power group are due to arrive in Vienna for discussions on Sunday. Iran and the U.S. have also made progress in recent days in addressing the tricky issue of sanctions relief, according to senior U.S. and Iranian officials. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has publicly demanded all economic and financial sanctions on Tehran be lifted at the time of an agreement. But Iranian negotiators in the past few days have committed in Vienna to a phased approach, where sanctions will be lifted as Iran takes specific steps to roll back its nuclear program. That includes disconnecting centrifuge machines, reducing the country’s nuclear stockpile and reconverting its heavy water reactor in the city of Arak so it produces less weapons-usable plutonium. “On a certain date, Iran will start doing its share, and at the same time, the Americans and the Europeans will commit themselves to terminate sanctions at a certain point,” a senior Iranian official said earlier this week. “So the commitment is made beforehand, and the actual termination will happen on the date that Iran will have finished its work.” A senior U.S. official had warned on Friday evening that the July 7 deadline could slip, as the two sides try to narrow differences on several key issues, including access to Iranian military sites, the timing of sanctions relief and the continuing questions about Iran’s past nuclear work. If Iran and the world powers meet the July 7 deadline, it would mean the U.S. Congress would only get 30 days to review an agreement. However, if no deal is reached before July 9, the U.S. legislature would have an additional 30 days to look over the accord. That would give skeptics more time to rally opposition. Appearing to anticipate an agreement in Vienna, leaders of the Republican party in Washington, on Saturday stepped-up attacks on what they alleged were going to be weak terms. “Obama administration officials have talked themselves into the delusion that the regime in Tehran will use a sanctions-relief jackpot to help its people,” said Rep. Ed Royce (R., Calif.), chairman of the House Foreign Relations Committee, on Saturday. “But Iran’s Supreme Leader isn’t looking to cut this deal because he cares about ordinary Iranians.”