podesta-emails
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=5a6T
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Interesting that Sumners uses the term "politics of envy" like the Republicans do
John Anzalone
Anzalone Liszt Grove Research
334-387-3121
PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.ALGpolling.com<http://www.ALGpolling.com>
twitter: @AnzaloneLiszt
On Feb 7, 2015, at 7:23 PM, Nick Merrill <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/us/politics/economic-plan-is-a-quandary-for-hillary-clintons-campaign.html?_r=0&referrer=
Economic Plan Is a Quandary for Hillary Clinton’s Campaign
With advice from more than 200 policy experts, Hillary Rodham Clinton<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/hillary_rodham_clinton/index.html?inline=nyt-per> is trying to answer what has emerged as a central question of her early presidential campaign strategy: how to address the anger about income inequality without overly vilifying the wealthy.
Mrs. Clinton has not had to wade into domestic policy since before she became secretary of state in 2009, and she has spent the past few months engaged in policy discussions with economists on the left and closer to the Democratic Party’s center who are grappling with the discontent set off by the gap between rich and poor. Sorting through the often divergent advice to develop an economic plan could affect the timing and planning of the official announcement of her campaign.
Although people close to Mrs. Clinton say she has not yet settled on a specific platform, she is expected to embrace several principles. They include standard Democratic initiatives like raising the minimum wage, investing in infrastructure, closing corporate tax loopholes and cutting taxes for the middle class. Other ideas are newer, such as providing incentives to corporations to increase profit-sharing with employees and changing labor laws to give workers more collective bargaining power.
Behind many of these proposals is a philosophy, endorsed by Mrs. Clinton’s closest economic advisers and often referred to as inclusive capitalism, that contends that a majority of Americans do not want to punish the rich; they just want to feel that they, too, have a chance to succeed. It also calls for corporations to put less emphasis on short-term profits that increase shareholder value and to invest more in employees, the environment and communities.
Whether Mrs. Clinton’s approach will be enough to satisfy the unease over growing economic disparity is unclear. In a Gallup poll<http://www.gallup.com/poll/181340/satisfied-ability-ahead.aspx> conducted last month, 67 percent of Americans said they were dissatisfied with the way income and wealth are distributed in the United States. In the 2008 Democratic presidential primary, Mrs. Clinton’s economic message — summed up by a frequent refrain, “If you work hard, you play by the rules, you ought to be able to get ahead” — resonated with white, working-class voters, who overwhelmingly supported her over Barack Obama.
But in the years since, Mrs. Clinton has come under criticism for delivering speeches to Wall Street banks at more than $200,000 each, roughly four times the median annual household income in the United States, and for comments she made about her family’s financial situation, including a lament<http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/11/paul-takes-on-clinton-over-her-dead-broke-comments/> about being “dead broke” after leaving the White House. And she must convince a middle class that feels frustrated and left behind that she understands its struggles, even as she relies heavily on the financial industry and corporate interests to fund her candidacy.
Nick Merrill, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, said she had “a record of bringing people together to solve big problems, while also putting a real premium on accountability.”
Asked whether creating an economic message could affect the timeline for her presidential campaign, Mr. Merrill said, “There’s no red X on a calendar somewhere, but make no mistake: If she runs, she will present solutions to our toughest challenges.”
Mrs. Clinton’s economic plan would be more populist and reliant on the government than the centrist approach of trade agreements, welfare reform and deficit reduction associated with her husband, former President Bill Clinton.
“It’s not enough to address upward mobility without addressing inequality,” said Lawrence H. Summers, a Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration who is among those talking with Mrs. Clinton. “The challenge, though, is to address inequality without embracing a politics of envy.”
The debate is extending beyond the Democratic Party as Republicans wade into the issues. “If Americans are working harder than ever, earning less than they once did, our government and our leaders should step up, offer a plan, fix what’s wrong,” former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida said in a speech in Detroit<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/05/us/politics/in-detroit-jeb-bush-tests-campaign-message-on-economy.html> last week as he laid the groundwork for his potential 2016 candidacy.
Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state when some major economic debates took hold on Capitol Hill, and as a result, her economic views are still not broadly known. Her approach to poverty was forged in the 1970s, when she went door to door while working for the Children’s Defense Fund, leaving her a committed advocate for early childhood education, equal pay for women and paid leave.
But later experiences complicated her worldview. Many of the advocates who knew Mrs. Clinton as a champion for the poor and working-class women felt betrayed in 1996 when, as first lady, she supported Mr. Clinton’s overhaul of the welfare system, which gave states more power to remove people from welfare rolls and pledged to cut federal spending on assistance for the poor by nearly $55 billion over six years. She was more skeptical about the North American Free Trade Agreement, which Mr. Clinton signed into law in 1993 and which has also been accused of hurting American workers.
After being elected in New York to the United States Senate in 2000, Mrs. Clinton had another constituency to represent: Wall Street. In 2001, she supported bankruptcy legislation that some Democrats — most notably Elizabeth Warren, now senator from Massachusetts — argued hurt working families and single mothers, and they accused her of doing the bidding of the financial industry. Mrs. Clinton has said she worked to improve the bill.
As a presidential candidate in 2008, Mrs. Clinton angered some of her Wall Street donors when she came out early in support of the regulation of derivatives and other complicated financial products and called for eliminating the “carried interest” loophole that allowed some financiers to avoid paying millions in income taxes. She also said that as president, she would create a cabinet-level position to fight poverty.
When the housing market collapsed, Mrs. Clinton, who had returned to the Senate full time after Mr. Obama defeated her, proposed legislation similar to a New Deal-era program that would allow the government to help homeowners refinance their mortgages. She voted in favor of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which led to the Troubled Asset Relief Program and the multibillion-dollar bailout for automakers<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/20/business/us-signals-end-of-bailouts-of-automakers-and-wall-street.html>.
Last month, Mrs. Clinton reiterated her support for the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial regulation<http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/credit_crisis/financial_regulatory_reform/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> law. “Attacking financial reform is risky and wrong,” she wrote<https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/556163273738166272> on Twitter.
As she dives back into domestic policy, Mrs. Clinton faces an economy in which, even amid steady job growth<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/07/business/economy/jobs-unemployment-figures.html>, weekly earnings for low- and middle-income workers have remained virtually unchanged for 15 years.
“Where has the money gone?” asked Robert B. Reich, a secretary of labor during the Clinton administration. “That is the topic that is embarrassing for people to talk about, particularly in Washington, because even mentioning it creates the potential charge of class warfare.”
Mr. Reich, who recently sent Mrs. Clinton a five-page memo laying out his ideas, said candidates in both parties needed to abandon the politically safe discussion of upward mobility for the poor and middle class that dominated the 1990s, and instead take on the stickier issue of income distribution.
“Upward mobility, equal opportunity — those are safe phrases and safe aspirations,” he said in an interview. “I don’t want to minimize their importance, but they obscure the real issue.”
Mr. Reich is one of some 200 economists and academics who have offered Mrs. Clinton ideas and guidance as she settles on an economic doctrine. Several of Mr. Clinton’s former advisers, including Alan S. Blinder, Robert E. Rubin and Mr. Summers, maintain influence. But Mrs. Clinton has cast a wide net that also includes Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics who has written extensively about inequality; Alan B. Krueger, a professor at Princeton and co-author of “Inequality in America<http://www.amazon.com/Inequality-America-Policies-Symposium-University/dp/0262582600/>”; and Peter R. Orszag, a former director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Obama. Teresa Ghilarducci, a labor economist who focuses on retirement issues, is also playing a prominent role.
Last month in Washington, a 17-person commission convened by the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank with close ties to Mrs. Clinton, presented a 166-page report<https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/report/2015/01/15/104266/report-of-the-commission-on-inclusive-prosperity/> on “inclusive prosperity,” which is among the numerous economic blueprints Mrs. Clinton has reviewed. For some, the solutions proposed by the committee, of which Mr. Summers was co-chairman, did not go far enough.
Dean Baker, an economist and co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, has pushed the idea of a government fee on the sale or purchase of certain financial assets, which he believes could hold Wall Street accountable while funding social services. “Clinton people didn’t want to go near it,” Mr. Baker said.
Mrs. Clinton has not commented on the financial transaction tax or on profit-sharing.
She has expressed support for many of the proposals Mr. Obama laid out in his State of the Union address<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/21/us/state-of-the-union-obama-ambitious-agenda-to-help-middle-class.html> last month, signaling that they could help shape her agenda. In a post<https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/557739125886169088> on Twitter, she said the speech had “pointed way to an economy that works for all. Now we need to step up & deliver for the middle class.”
Mrs. Clinton frequently talks about the economic success of the Clinton administration<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/01/us/politics/bill-clinton-defends-his-economic-legacy.html>, under which median family income, adjusted for inflation, increased to $56,080 in 1999 from $48,884 in 1993, compared with a decline to $51,017 in 2012 from $55,987 in 2000, according to census data. But she has acknowledged that a globalized economy calls for new ideas, and many are urging her to go beyond her comfort zone and address the deeper frustrations of those who have not shared in that economy’s benefits.
“Long-term answers about education and skills that help change mobility don’t get at the current frustrations and aggravations,” said Austan D. Goolsbee, an economic adviser to Mr. Obama and a professor at the University of Chicago.
“People want to answer the question, ‘Are we going to be O.K.?’ ” Mr. Goolsbee said. “And then the natural question is, ‘Whose fault was that, and let’s go find those people.’ ”
On Feb 6, 2015, at 12:30 PM, Joel Benenson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Well – We need someone to get our “friends” on the phone and tell them this doesn’t help;
From: Nick Merrill [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 12:18 PM
To: Joel Benenson; Robby Mook
Cc: Mandy Grunwald; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Philippe Reines; Huma Abedin; Dan Schwerin; Jim Margolis; John Anzalone; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: NYT & WSJ | Econ Stories
I’m passing along a document that came from one of our friends, written for and sent directly to Amy Chozick for this NYT piece she’s working on. Gives you a sense of what we’re all up against!
From: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, February 2, 2015 at 10:27 AM
To: Robby Mook <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Mandy Grunwald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, NSM <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Cheryl Mills <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, John Podesta <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jacob Sullivan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Philippe Reines <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Huma Abedin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Dan Schwerin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jim Margolis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Kristina Schake <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: NYT & WSJ | Econ Stories
Mandy is right. We keep emphasizing that the most significant pain point for people is that the belief the decked is stacked against them in favor of this at the top. And they're not wrong.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 2, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Robby Mook <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Agree
On Feb 2, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Mandy Grunwald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I think this piece turned out well.
But when we define our goals, we have to be clear that we are concerned with helping people who are getting crushed by rising costs and stagnant incomes, not that we're worried about offending high income groups (our donors). My guess is that this sentence will cause us some problems on the left.
One of Mrs. Clinton’s broader goals is to develop ways to address economic anxiety without sounding like a combative populist or demonizing high-income groups, said a person familiar with her thinking.
Mandy Grunwald
Grunwald Communications
202 973-9400
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Merrill <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: Joel Benenson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Cheryl Mills <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Mandy Grunwald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Robby Mook <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; John Podesta <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Jake Sullivan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Philippe Reines <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Huma Abedin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Dan Schwerin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Jim Margolis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; John Anzalone <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Cheryl Mills <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Kristina Schake <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Sun, Feb 1, 2015 11:38 pm
Subject: Re: NYT & WSJ | Econ Stories
http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-consults-experts-to-define-economic-pitch-1422837490
Clinton Consults to Define Economic Pitch
By Peter Nicholas
Hillary Clinton <http://topics.wsj.com/person/C/Hillary-Clinton/6344> has been consulting with an array of economists and academics—including liberal Joseph Stiglitz, former Fed chairman Paul Volcker and new faces outside the traditional orbit of Democratic policy experts—as she prepares for a likely presidential campaign that would make sluggish wage growth and middle-class prosperity a central focus.
One of Mrs. Clinton’s broader goals is to develop ways to address economic anxiety without sounding like a combative populist or demonizing high-income groups, said a person familiar with her thinking. It isn’t clear whether that particular question has come up in the meetings she has been having with various policy experts.
She has been using the meetings to prepare herself for a possible campaign, ground herself in the issues and tease out fresh approaches to stubborn domestic and foreign policy problems, people familiar with the matter said.
As the former secretary of state keeps a low public profile ahead of announcing her near-certain candidacy, the meetings offer clues to which issues she believes merit attention and whose advice she values. Many, but not all, participants served in Bill Clinton ’s administration; others are distinguished primarily by expertise in subjects that are certain to be front-and-center in the 2016 presidential race.
Some of the meetings had the feeling of a high-octane faculty symposium and lasted for hours, say people familiar with the sessions. Pen and pad in hand, Mrs. Clinton typically has gone around the room to ask for ideas, offering comments now and then and inviting participants to make suggestions down the road.
In December, Mrs. Clinton presided over a meeting at a midtown Manhattan hotel that focused on middle-class Americans feeling pinched by slow wage growth.
Among those attending: Mr. Volcker, the architect of the “Volcker Rule,” a regulatory measure barring banks from making risky bets with their own money; Jonathan Cowan, co-founder of the centrist think tank Third Way, which has been critical of some of the populist rhetoric coming from the Democrats’ liberal wing; and Alan Blinder <http://topics.wsj.com/person/B/Alan-Blinder/4> , a Princeton professor and former Fed vice chairman and economics adviser to Mr. Clinton.
Also at the meeting, according to people familiar with it, were Robert Hormats, who worked in the State Department during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure and was a former vice chairman of Goldman Sachs; Richard Ravitch <http://topics.wsj.com/person/R/Richard-Ravitch/5985> , a former Democratic lieutenant governor in New York, who helped New York City avert bankruptcy during a fiscal crisis in the 1970s; and Teresa Ghilarducci, a labor economist and proponent of ideas to shore up Americans’ retirement savings. The Clinton team has asked her to help evaluate various policy ideas.
The participants examined a range of ideas to boost economic security, such as tax cuts for the middle class, expanded access to prekindergarten education and new ways to pay for improvements to roads and tunnels, said people familiar with the session.
“One major focus of the meeting was the miserable recent performance of wages in general and middle-class wages in particular, and what if anything the government can do about that,” said Mr. Blinder.
Bernard Schwartz, a longtime Democratic donor and contributor to the Clinton Foundation, was among those who helped arrange the meeting, said people familiar with the session. Mr. Schwartz is a former chairman of Loral Space & Communications Ltd. Mrs. Clinton also has consulted with Mr. Stiglitz, a former economic adviser to Bill Clinton and author of a book about the perils of economic inequality.
The policy interests of some participants point to the issues Mrs. Clinton is likely to prioritize, notably the financial pressures faced by middle-class families. Prospective Republican presidential candidates also are talking about shoring up the middle class and, in some cases, narrowing the wage gap in America—a sign that those topics will be flashpoints in the general election.
Mrs. Clinton is the overwhelming front-runner for the Democratic nomination, but some liberals would like to see her challenged by U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren <http://topics.wsj.com/person/W/Elizabeth-Warren/8131> (D., Mass.), a populist firebrand who has described the American economic system as “rigged” in favor of the wealthy. Ms. Warren has said she won’t run. In targeting income inequality, Mrs. Clinton would address a substantive issue facing the country while also making inroads with Ms. Warren’s liberal followers.
Mrs. Clinton also has held foreign policy meetings in New York and Washington. A New York meeting in the summer was a “tour” of global hot spots, among them the war in Syria and Russia’s incursions into Ukraine, according to people familiar with what took place.
Mrs. Clinton asked for a diagnosis of the problem and a “strategic” view of how the U.S. should act, one person familiar with the meeting said.
Those who attended included Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, who worked under both Republican presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush; David Rothkopf, author of a new book on foreign policy-making in the George W. Bush and Obama <http://topics.wsj.com/person/O/Obama/4328> administrations; and Dennis Ross, a diplomat with many years of experience in the Middle East peace negotiations.
More informally, Mrs. Clinton has also spoken to trusted Democratic confidants about appointments to high-level positions in her campaign, should she decide to run.
A campaign apparatus is already taking shape. John Podesta, a senior adviser to President Barack Obama, is likely to become a senior adviser to the campaign, while two Obama campaign veterans, pollster Joel Benenson and media adviser Jim Margolis, are expected to take top positions on Mrs. Clinton’s campaign team, people familiar with the matter said.
“She’s casting a wide net, talking to a wide range of people on a wide range of specific topics” said Nick Merrill, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton. “Make no mistake, if she runs, she will present solutions to our toughest challenges, she will take nothing for granted, and she will fight for every vote.”
On Feb 1, 2015, at 6:54 PM, Nick Merrill < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ran the quote past HRC and she asked (with no prompting) that “average” come out. So here’s what I shipped off to Peter Nicholas at the Journal. AS for the NYT, looks like it won’t run for a few days if not next Sunday, so will circle back on that as it develops.
Thanks again to all for the feedback.
Go Seahawks!
"Expanding opportunities for hardworking Americans so that families can get ahead has been a constant fight she has waged in every job she's held. You heard it from her last fall when she was campaigning for Democrats all over the country and repeatedly laid out the challenges many Americans still face as our economy makes gains. She’s casting a wide net, talking to a wide range of people on a wide range of specific topics. There's no red X on a calendar somewhere, but make no mistake, if she runs, she will present solutions to our toughest challenges, she will take nothing for granted, and she will fight for every vote. ”
From: Joel Benenson < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 5:39 PM
To: Cheryl Mills < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: NSM < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Mandy Grunwald < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Robby Mook < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, John Podesta < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jacob Sullivan < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Philippe Reines < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Huma Abedin < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Dan Schwerin < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jim Margolis < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, John Anzalone < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Cheryl Mills < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jennifer Palmieri < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Kristina Schake < [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: NYT & WSJ | Econ Stories
Definitely
From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 5:35 PM
To: Joel Benenson
Cc: Nick Merrill; Mandy Grunwald; Robby Mook; John Podesta; Jake Sullivan; Philippe Reines; Huma Abedin; Dan Schwerin; Jim Margolis; John Anzalone; Cheryl Mills; Jennifer Palmieri; Kristina Schake
Subject: Re: NYT & WSJ | Econ Stories
can we test every day americans next time?
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Joel Benenson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
When we tested deck is stacked against “average Americans, with too many breaks for those at the top” vs. Gov regs and rules hurging biz and stopping them from creating jobs – by 49-41 among all voters and 56-33 with our MOR (middle of the road voters) . I think it’s how they see themselves in this environment, which remains their big pain point that she is fighting to fix.
For the moment it also creates a slight language difference with POTUS – not a big deal but a nuance.
Joel
From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 5:22 PM
To: Nick Merrill
Cc: Joel Benenson; Mandy Grunwald; Robby Mook; John Podesta; Jake Sullivan; Philippe Reines; Huma Abedin; Dan Schwerin; Jim Margolis; John Anzalone; Cheryl Mills; Jennifer Palmieri; Kristina Schake
Subject: Re: NYT & WSJ | Econ Stories
Looks good. I think you can take out average and still communicate you mean folks in middle with "hardworking" (who likes to be average?)
if average is important I might use everyday.
cdm
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Nick Merrill <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Great, thank you.
Robby to your point about letting her speak for herself, I¹ve been
reminding people that they should be careful to acknowledge that this is
part of a process. She laid out challenges that we face in the midterms,
and now she¹s thinking through how we would address them should she run.
Will reinforce that when I circle back with these guys today.
Here¹s the quote again incorporating peoples¹ thoughts. John Anzalone, I
think Joel addressed what you were trying to get at so I left his edits as
is, but let me know if you think we¹re missing anything. Otherwise will
push this in the next little while. Thanks all.
"Expanding opportunities for average hardworking Americans so that they
and their families can get ahead has been a constant fight she has waged
in every job she's held. You heard it from her last fall when she was
campaigning for Democrats all over the country and repeatedly laid out the
challenges many Americans still face as our economy makes gains. She's
casting a wide net, talking to a wide range of people on a range of
specific topics. There's no red X on a calendar somewhere, but make no
mistake, if she runs, she will present solutions to our toughest
challenges, she will take nothing for granted, and she will fight for
every vote."
On 2/1/15, 4:05 PM, "Joel Benenson" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>Yes.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mandy Grunwald [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
>Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 4:05 PM
>To: Robby Mook
>Cc: Joel Benenson; Nick Merrill; John Podesta; Jake Sullivan; Philippe
>Reines; Cheryl Mills; Huma Abedin; Dan Schwerin; Jim Margolis; John
>Anzalone; Cheryl Mills; Jennifer Palmieri; Kristina Schake
>Subject: Re: NYT & WSJ | Econ Stories
>
>I like it too.
>
>There's a word missing toward the end. I assume it should say "...she
>will present SOLUTIONS to our toughest challenges..."
>
>Thx
>
>Mandy Grunwald
>Grunwald Communications
>202 973-9400<tel:202%20973-9400>
>
>
>> On Feb 1, 2015, at 3:39 PM, Robby Mook <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Adding Jenn and Kristina
>> Joel I agree w your edits. In particular I want to avoid any
>>expectations around how big or bold her ideas will be.
>> Nick I'm sure you're already doing this but I also would push hard on
>>background that we can't judge a candidate who has yet to announce--give
>>her a chance to speak for herself. I know that's impossible but worth
>>trying to get them to acknowledge that she's not a candidate and this is
>>all speculation.
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 1, 2015, at 3:14 PM, Joel Benenson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Nick.
>>>
>>> Going for a little more conversational here with this:
>>>
>>> "Expanding opportunities for average hardworking Americans so that
>>>they and their families can get ahead has been a constant fight she has
>>>waged in every job she's held. You heard it from her last fall when
>>>she was campaigning for Democrats all over the country and repeatedly
>>>laid out the challenges many Americans still face as our economy makes
>>>gains. She's casting a wide net, talking to a wide range of people on
>>>a range of specific topics. There's no red X on a calendar somewhere,
>>>but make no mistake, if she runs, she will present to our toughest
>>>challenges and she will take nothing for granted and she will fight
>>>for every vote."
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Nick Merrill [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 2:46 PM
>>> To: John Podesta; Jake Sullivan; Philippe Reines; Robby Mook; Cheryl
>>>Mills; Huma Abedin; Dan Schwerin; Jim Margolis; John Anzalone; Mandy
>>>Grunwald; Cheryl Mills; Joel Benenson
>>> Subject: NYT & WSJ | Econ Stories
>>>
>>> As I mentioned on our call on Thursday, both the WSJ and the NYT are
>>>working on stories about how HRC might approach economic policy issues
>>>as a candidate. Both will have a dose of personnel name-gaming, and
>>>I've spoken to both to steer them towards progressive names, which they
>>>seem to both have on their own.
>>>
>>> I want to give both stories something on the record that addresses the
>>>core of the story, but also speaks some of the things we all felt
>>>needed a little proactive addressing, like inevitability and timing.
>>>
>>> On the inevitability question, John I tried to stick to the language
>>>you suggested, though I did take the liberty of striking the word
>>>"idiot."
>>>
>>> "Increasing access to opportunity and fighting for upward mobility has
>>>been an uninterrupted pursuit of hers in every job she's held. You
>>>heard it from her on the campaign trail last fall, where she laid out
>>>the challenges we face. She's casting a wide net, talking to a wide
>>>range of people on a range of specific topics. There's no red X on a
>>>calendar somewhere, but make no mistake, if she runs, she will take
>>>nothing for granted, she'll present bold ideas, and she will fight for
>>>every vote."
>>>
>>> Feedback welcome, but I'd like to ship this later today.
>>>
>>> Nick
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
1440bb3a1757e1ee1dfb4bf6b1a54c7d41bc67c9713ee9168ac1387da49a4a13
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email
Comments 0