EFTA00632018.pdf

From: Cecile de Jongh To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.corn> Subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Bridge - Tibbar Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:16:13 +0000 No, I called him as well and left a VM. With warm regards, Cecile On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:59 PM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: did pomeranaz get back to you? On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Cecile de Jongh .< 1.1.1a wrote: Thanks. With warm regards, Cecile On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:51 PM, Jeffrey E. <jeevacationt&gmail.com> wrote: no interst On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Cecile de Jongh < > wrote: FYI the below email thread. If there is no interest in this, please let me know so I can pass the answer along to Sebastiano. Thanks. With warm regards, Cecile On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:06 AM, Sebastiano Paiewonsky Cassinelli > wrote: Cecile: We wanted to share the email thread below. While we suggest that the ask remains at $3.5M the option for less exists as more fully outlined below. Many thanks. EFTA00632018 Seb Sebastiano Paiewonsky-Cassinelli AH Riise Begin forwarded message: Sent from my iPhone On May 26, 2015, at 9:55 PM, Sebastiano Paiewonsky Cassinelli wrote: I personally think $2.25M could get us very close to closing and I can discuss why. The partial amount will jump start everything. Alternatively, if we are able to raise $1M to $1.5M now this could get us very close to determining whether we can put the SBLC structure in place with the fund eliminating the need for further bridge. Brandon believes we could finalize this option within 4 to 6 weeks (assuming the fund wants to move forward and it had expressed a strong interest in the project). We need $3.5M to close but smaller tranches would mean everything and if we hit agreed milestones and continued to reduce risk by doing so additional funds could be released. On May 26, 2015, at 7:51 PM, ' > wrote: Seb, Aaron and I go through payables non-stop and we all know what it will take to close and $3.5M is definitely the minimum. The only reason we COULD accept less is if we know first what the party is willing to contribute - $2M? $3M? and then we can start going to WAPA or VIPA or whomever to try to negotiate waiting. However, not something we want to risk and do unless we have someone at the table saying for example that they cannot put in more than $2M. SBLC would take longer than 4-6 weeks. None of us know exactly how long but 1100% guarantee it will be more than 4-6 weeks. Therefore, Aaron's reference below to tranches makes sense. The way to present is the party could do a $1.5M tranche initially and then we see if we go the SBLC route or not. This gives us time to travel down that road and the money to do it. Then within 2-3 weeks we should have a clearer picture. EFTA00632019 From talking to other investors, no one wants to put in only $1.5M when they know we really need $3.5M to close. They want to understand how we are getting the rest of the funds needed. I wish we needed less but the reality is $3.5M to ensure getting to the closing table and this is the truth. We don't want to negotiate against ourselves here and risk closing. If you feel tomorrow that $1.5-$2M is the limit at this time, I would suggest the tranche and once this party is in, they will want to help us get to the finish line. Warm Regards, Tania Tomyn CEO/President Follow and Like us on Facebook! .ssid:image001.jpg@01 CDA578.B7EF1510 From: Sebastiano Paiewonsky Cassinelli [mailto: Sent: Tuesda Ma 26, 2015 7:36 PM To: Cc: Jon Chipps Subject: Re: Bridge I know you are exhausted but I really need for Mark or yourself to comb the payables. if we get the SBLC deal in place in 4-6 weeks, what level of bridge? $1M? $1.5M? $2M$ if no SBLC, $2M? Sebastiano Paiewonsky-Cassinelli AH Riise Sebastiano Paiewonsky-Cassinelli AH Riise Begin forwarded message: EFTA00632020 From: " > Date: May 26, 2015 at 7:30:09 PM AST To: Sebastiano Paiewonskv Cassinelli Cc: " Yes maybe but remember we have couple million in payables we are hardly touching and we will have to put these fires out until close. We should get all we can from him. If he will only give us $3M we will deal with it or less or more. WAPA is $200k Bond WAPA Legal $75k (This really can't be stalled) VIPA Bond $260k The question is can we do it for less I don't think so. However, if you guy gives us $2.5 or $3M we will get the rest somehow it will be easier to borrow as we get closer to close. In reality things have been delayed so each month the bridge needs grow by about $150. Again we will deal with that. Usually if they will give $2.5M he would prefer to give the full $3.5 or more to make sure we get closed but it has hurdles we need to meet. We can't change the number it's only going up not down. We can borrow it later easier once the project is moving forward with the first chunk of bridge. If your guy needed to invest in tranches that is fine as well. Maybe $1.5 up front then $750k a month as long as we meet hurdles reducing his risk and helping us get there. That should give you what you need. Aaron Smith "Like" on Facebook St.Croix, USVI Office Las Vegas Offices Original Message From: Sebastiano Paiewonsky Cassinelli [mailto: Sent: Tuesda , Ma 26, 2015 7:11 PM To: Cc: , Jon Chipps Subject: Re: Bridge Any other opportunities to whittle the amount down and stretch it out to closing? Sebastiano Paiewonsky-Cassinelli AH Riise EFTA00632021  37 Main Street/P.O. Box 6280 On May 26, 2015, at 6:33 PM, ' c wrote: 500k. Aaron Smith Tibbar Energy USVI LLC Original message From: Sebastiano Paiewonsky-Cassinelli Date: 05/26/2015 6:25 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Jon Chipps < > Subject: Re: Bridge If I get WAPA and VIPA to agree to take payment for the bonds at the closing of the construction loan, by how much will this reduce the $3.5M bridge amount? Need to know this prior to tomorrow's meeting. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this EFTA00632022  communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved MIM please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00632023