podesta_email_01929.txt

podesta-emails 61,504 words email

P22 P17 D6 P23 V14

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *H4A News Clips* *July 19, 2015* *TODAY’S KEY STORIES..................................................................................... 4* In Iowa, it was a good night for Clinton — and her rivals // WaPo // Dan Balz – July 18, 2015..... 4 Hillary Clinton slams Trump over criticism of McCain // WaPo // Sean Sullivan – July 18, 2015. 7 *HRC NATIONAL COVERAGE.............................................................................. 7* Clinton and Sanders Take Aim at Different Targets as Democrats Gather in Iowa // WSJ // Laura Meckler – July 18, 2015.......................................................................................................................... 7 Why Hillary Clinton is pushing to reignite Democrats in Arkansas // WaPo // Sean Sullivan – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................................ 10 As Democrats face off, Clinton keeps focus on GOP // AP – July 18, 2015................................. 12 Clinton Eulogizes Promoter of National Civil Rights Museum // AP – July 18, 2015.................. 14 Hillary Clinton is ignoring Bernie Sanders — and it's a smart move // AP // Lisa Lerer – July 18, 2015 14 Hillary Clinton to hold private fundraiser near Pittsburgh // AP – July 18, 2015....................... 16 Hillary finds new major fundraisers to boost campaign // Politico // Tarini Parti & Theodoric Meyer – July 18, 2015..................................................................................................................................... 16 Hillary Clinton slams Trump’s ‘shameful’ comments on McCain’s war record // Politico // Annie Karni – July 18, 2015................................................................................................................................ 19 Hillary Clinton Calls Donald Trump Comments 'Shameful' // Bloomberg // Jennifer Epstein – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................................ 21 Hillary Clinton Condemns Donald Trump’s ‘Insults’ of ‘Genuine War Hero’ John McCain // ABC News // Liz Kreutz – July 18, 2015........................................................................................................... 22 At first cattle call, Democrats hone name-free Clinton attacks // CNN // Dan Merica – July 18, 2015 23 'Older,' 'Wiser,' 'Richer' Donald Trump Would Be Better President Than Hillary Clinton, Bill Kristol Says // ABC News // Ben Bell – July 18, 2015.................................................................................... 25 Clinton, Sanders share the stage in Iowa // The Hill // Elliot Smilowitz – July 18, 2015............ 26 Hillary Clinton turns up the heat as Iowa takes on general election feel // The Guardian // Ben Jacobs – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................... 27 Hillary Clinton delivers fiery speech at Democratic party hall of fame dinner // The Guardian // Ben Jacobs – July 18, 2015........................................................................................................................ 30 Elizabeth Warren Gives Hillary Clinton Economic Advice (Sort Of) In a Fiery Public Speech // Bustle // Lauren Barbato – July 18, 2015........................................................................................................ 30 Hillary Forbids Young Supporters from Talking to Press // The Weekly Standard // Daniel Halper – July 18, 2015..................................................................................................................................... 32 Together the First Time, Hillary Clinton and Her Rival 2016 Democrats Still Play Nice // The National Journal // Emily Schultheis – July 18, 2015....................................................................................... 33 The trap Hillary can’t escape: Her Bernie Sanders problem is she doesn’t understand Sanders’ policies are popular, mainstream and the future // Salon // Bill Curry – July 19, 2015............................... 35 National Security Expert Slams Hillary’s ‘Assault’ On Free Speech // The Daily Caller // Rachel Stoltzfoos – July 18, 2015........................................................................................................................ 40 Hillary Clinton defends Iran pact during Davenport, Iowa, campaign stop // Sioux City Journal // Ed Tibbetts – July 18, 2015...................................................................................................................... 41 Clinton remembers D'Army Bailey at funeral // Commercial Appeal // Thomas Bailey – July 18, 2015 43 *OTHER DEMOCRATS NATIONAL COVERAGE................................................. 45* *DECLARED................................................................................................. 45* *SANDERS................................................................................................. 45* Sanders vaults from fringe to the heart of the fray // The Boston Globe // Annie Linksey – July 18, 2015 45 *UNDECLARED............................................................................................ 49* *BIDEN...................................................................................................... 49* Sources: Joe Biden Still Considering A Presidential Campaign // HuffPo // Ryan Grim – July 18, 2015 49 Biden still considering 2016 bid: report // The Hill // Keith Laing – July 18, 2015................... 50 *OTHER..................................................................................................... 51* Activists disrupt forum featuring candidates O’Malley, Sanders // WaPo // John Wagner – July 18, 2015 51 Demonstrators disrupt presidential forum at Netroots event // AP // Ken Thomas – July 18, 2015 53 Iowa Democratic Party dinner: 5 takeaways // Politico // Gabriel Debenedetti – July 18, 2015. 55 Black Lives Matter' protesters flummox O'Malley, Sanders // Politico // Daniel Strauss – July 18, 2015 57 O'Malley apologizes for saying 'all lives matter' at liberal conference // CNN // Chris Moody – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................................ 59 Martin O'Malley And Bernie Sanders Interrupted By ‘Black Lives Matter’ Activists At Progressive Conference // HuffPo // Sam Levine – July 18, 2015................................................................................ 60 Democratic Presidential Candidates Face Off in Iowa // ABC News // Josh Haskell – July 18, 2015 61 Sanders, O'Malley face protesters at Netroots Nation conference // LA Times // Nigel Duara – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................................ 62 'Black Lives Matter' protesters halt Sanders, O’Malley events // The Hill // Mark Hensch – July 18, 2015 64 Democratic candidates turn dinner into a GOP bashing party // NY Post // Bob Fredericks – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................................ 65 ‘Black Lives Matter!’: Sanders, O’Malley Heckled by Liberal Demonstrators at Blogger Convention; Clinton a No-Show // The Blaze // Dave Urbanski – July 18, 2015......................................................... 66 O’Malley Apologizes For Saying ‘All Lives Matter’ // Daily Caller // Derek Hunter – July 18, 2015 67 O'Malley, Sanders Shouted Down at Netroots by 'Black Lives Matter' Protest // The National Journal // S.V. Dante – July 18, 2015........................................................................................................... 68 Martin O'Malley Was Booed For Saying "All Lives Matter," & Here's Why That Phrase Should Just Disappear // Bustle // Chris Togonotti – July 18, 2015............................................................................ 69 *GOP................................................................................................................. 70* *DECLARED................................................................................................. 70* *BUSH........................................................................................................ 71* Raising money is a Jeb Bush family business, even for the next generation // WaPo // Ed O’Keefe – July 18, 2015..................................................................................................................................... 71 Jeb Bush consultant critiques Republican digital culture // Yahoo News // Jon Ward – July 18, 2015 73 How Jeb Tackled the Cocaine Cartels // The Daily Beast // Betsy Woodruff – July 18, 2015..... 75 Talk of rolling back Obama’s Iran nuclear deal on day one is not ‘mature’ // The Washington Times // Kellan Howell – July 18, 2015.......................................................................................................... 79 *RUBIO..................................................................................................... 80* Rubio: ‘The American people believe in immigration' // The Hill // Keith Laing – July 18, 2015 80 *WALKER.................................................................................................. 81* Scott Walker Is Starting His Road to the White House in a Winnebago // ABC News // Jordyn Phelps – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................... 81 Iowa Republicans get some satisfaction as Scott Walker rolls up like a rock star // The Guardian // Ben Jacobs – July 18, 2015..................................................................................................................... 82 Scott Walker promises forceful foreign policy in Sioux City stop // Sioux City Journal // Bret Hayworth – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................... 83 *PAUL........................................................................................................ 85* Report: Rand Paul calls for scrutiny of Muslims // USA Today // Bill Theobald – July 18, 2015. 85 Ron Paul Not Listed As Donor To Rand Paul’s Presidential Campaign // Daily Caller // Jamie Weinstein – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................... 86 *CRUZ....................................................................................................... 86* Cruz: Planned Parenthood leaders should be prosecuted // The Hill // Keith Laing – July 18, 2015 86 Ted Cruz On Iran Deal: There Will Be Blood // Breitbart – July 18, 2015................................. 87 Ted Cruz says he won't 'go into the gutter' to criticize Donald Trump // Business Insider // Bryan Logan – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................... 88 *PERRY..................................................................................................... 89* Rick Perry redoubles attack on Donald Trump for John McCain remarks // The Guardian // Ben Jacobs – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................... 89 Perry calls on Trump to end his campaign: ‘His comments have reached a new low’ // Washington Times // Seth McLaughlin – July 18, 2015........................................................................................... 90 Rick Perry: Trump Is Unfit to Lead the Military, ‘Should Immediately Withdraw’ from Race // MediaIte // Josh Feldman – July 18, 2015....................................................................................................... 91 Rick Perry calls on Donald Trump to withdraw from the presidential race // Business Insider // Maxwell Tani – July 18, 2015..................................................................................................................... 92 *GRAHAM................................................................................................. 93* 'I feel like I'm on Oprah': Lindsey Graham tears up in Iowa as he explains how the government helped him survive his parents' early death // Daily Mail // David Martosko – July 18, 2015..................... 93 *SANTORUM............................................................................................. 95* Rick Santorum wants curbs on legal immigration in effort to help boost wages in US // AP – July 18, 2015............................................................................................................................................ 96 *HUCKABEE............................................................................................. 96* Huckabee Responds to Trump: ‘John McCain is a hero’ // Alex Swoyer – July 18, 2015............ 96 *CARSON................................................................................................... 96* Carson: Black voters 'waking up' to GOP // The Hill // Keith Laing – July 18, 2015................... 97 Dr. Ben Carson on ‘Trump’s McCain Statement: ‘We Need to Hear from Everybody’ // Breitbart News // Alex Swoyer – July 18, 2015.......................................................................................................... 97 *JINDAL.................................................................................................... 98* Jindal focuses on his religion in Indianola // The Des Moines Register // Paige Godden – July 18, 2015 98 *TRUMP.................................................................................................. 100* The Trump Campaign’s Turning Point // NYT // Nate Cohn – July 18, 2015........................... 100 Donald Trump disparaged John McCain’s military service. Is this the end of his run? // WaPo // Philip Bump – July 18, 2015...................................................................................................................... 103 Trump slams McCain for being ‘captured’ in Vietnam; other Republicans quickly condemn him // WaPo // Philip Rucker – July 18, 2015............................................................................................... 104 Trump Surge Leaves All but Jeb Bush in Donald’s Dust // WSJ // Dante Chinni – July 18, 2015 107 Trump's Criticism of McCain Overshadows Issues in Iowa // AP – July 18, 2015..................... 108 Trump attacks McCain: 'I like people who weren't captured' // Politico // Ben Schreckinger – July 18, 2015.......................................................................................................................................... 110 Trump on John McCain: 'I Like People That Weren't Captured, Okay?' // Bloomberg // Sahil Kapur – July 18, 2015................................................................................................................................... 112 Trump questions McCain's bravery, says 'he is not a war hero' // CNN // Mark Preston & Eugene Scott – July 18, 2015.............................................................................................................................. 113 Republicans Condemn Donald Trump After He Belittles John McCain’s War Record // TIME // Zeke Miller – July 18, 2015....................................................................................................................... 117 Donald Trump Hits the Limits of Celebrity // TIME // Zeke Miller – July 18, 2015................. 118 After Donald Trump says John McCain 'not a war hero,' Republican rivals denounce him // LA Times // Noah Bierman – July 18, 2015...................................................................................................... 120 Trump clarifies attacks on McCain // The Hill // Keith Laing – July 18, 2015.......................... 122 Draft-Dodging Trump Says POW McCain ‘Not A War Hero’ // Daily Beast // Olivia Nuzzi – July 18, 2015 123 Trump comments on McCain war record spark outrage // USA Today // Jason Noble – July 18, 2015 129 After Attacking John McCain's War Record, Donald Trump's Dramatic Fall Is Predictable // Forbes – July 18, 2015................................................................................................................................... 131 *UNDECLARED........................................................................................... 133* *OTHER................................................................................................... 133* Seeing Crowd, G.O.P. Donors Holding Back // NYT // Nicholas Confessore & Sarah Cohen – July 18, 2015 133 On Republican Hopefuls’ Checklist: A Super PAC and Lots of Money // WSJ // Patrick O’connor and Reid J. Epstein - July 19, 2015........................................................................................................ 136 GOP contenders court evangelical vote in Iowa // AP – July 18, 2015..................................... 138 GOP's 2016 ad war slowly heating up // CNN // Tom LoBianco – July 18, 2015....................... 139 *TOP NEWS..................................................................................................... 141* *DOMESTIC................................................................................................. 141* Ku Klux Klan and New Black Panther Party Protest at South Carolina Capitol // NYT // Alan Binder – July 18, 2015................................................................................................................................... 141 *INTERNATIONAL...................................................................................... 143* ISIS Says It Carried Out Bombing That Killed 100 in Iraq // NYT // Anne Barnard – July 18, 2015 144 Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Says Nuclear Deal Won’t Change U.S. Ties // WSJ // Aresu Eqbali – July 18, 2015................................................................................................................................... 145 *TODAY’S KEY STORIES* *In Iowa, it was a good night for Clinton — and her rivals <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-iowa-it-was-a-good-night-for-clinton--and-her-rivals/2015/07/18/f7d171d0-2d67-11e5-960f-22c4ba982ed4_story.html> // WaPo // Dan Balz – July 18, 2015 * The first gathering of the Democratic presidential candidates played almost according to script here Friday night. Hillary Rodham Clinton stood above the field but did not dominate. Bernie Sanders displayed the passion that has made him such a favorite of the left. And Martin O’Malley’s speech got a reception that belied his anemic poll numbers. The serial speeches by Clinton, Sanders and O’Malley — who were joined in the program by fellow contenders Lincoln Chafee and Jim Webb — also highlighted the leftward shift of the Democratic Party under President Obama and the degree to which that movement is continuing during the contest for the party’s presidential nomination. Clinton, who spoke with the aid of a teleprompter, was fiery, funny and sharply partisan. It was a red-meat speech delivered to an audience eager for her to deliver it. She took little notice of her Democratic opponents and concentrated her attacks on the opposition party. She noted that Republicans have fresh faces running for president but denounced the GOP as a party mired in the past and wedded to policies that have not worked except for thewealthiest in society. On economics, she warned that the GOP candidates want to return to the tax-cutting policies of previous Republican administrations. “Trickle-down economics has to be one of the worst ideas of the 1980s,” she said. “It is right up there with New Coke, shoulder pads and big hair. I lived through it — and there are photographs. And we’re not going back to that.” That wasn’t her only hair reference. When she turned to Donald Trump, it went like this: “Finally, a candidate whose hair gets more attention than mine.” Then the humor stopped, as she added that there is “nothing funny about the hate he’s spewing” toward immigrants. She called it shameful and ridiculed the other GOP candidates for being slow to denounce Trump’s words. The former secretary of state and senator from New York attacked former Florida governor Jeb Bush for his comments on part-time work. She hit at Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker for restricting reproductive rights in his state, saying the voters should say no to politicians “who shame and blame” women. She even went after Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad for vetoing spending on mental health and got one of the biggest ovations of the night. If once she seemed tentative about talking about herself and her family, she no longer is. She talked as she has done in this campaign about the abandonment her mother endured as a child. She said becoming a grandmother was “transformational,” forcing one to consider the kind of future this generation will leave for others. “And that’s why I’m never going to let the Republicans rip away the progress we have made,” she said. She said she would fight against efforts to go back to trickle-down economics and to a “wild West on Wall Street,” to retrenchment on marriage rights or to efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act. She mocked Republicans who say they aren’t scientists and therefore can’t judge whether climate change is man-made. “Look, I’m not a scientist either,” she said. “I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain, and I’m not going to let them take us back.” She showed her willingness as well to embrace gender issues and the prospect of becoming the first female president. Ticking through a series of policies that would help women, she noted that some would say, “There she goes again” on women’s issues. “Well, I’m not going to stop,” she said, “so get ready for a long campaign.” Sanders’s fire Sanders again showed he is prepared to go where Clinton won’t on economic issues. He called for a nationwide mass movement against the “billionaire class” that he has made the heart of his populist insurgency. No president, he said, can bring about the changes he says are needed “unless there is a political revolution.” Clinton attacks Wall Street but hardly with the vigor of Sanders. Calling wealth and income inequality the moral and political issues of the day, the senator from Vermont identified his enemy and called on Democrats to take up the fight. “The greed for the billionaire class has got to end, and we are going to end it for them,” he said. There is an old-fashioned passion that Sanders brings to the campaign, and it has clearly found an audience on the left. Clinton’s policies are progressive but safely so; Sanders’s go beyond. Without naming her, he drew contrasts with Clinton that many in the audience clearly understood. Sanders would raise the minimum wage more than she. He opposes the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement. He favors both a big infrastructure program to rebuild roads and bridges as well as a big public jobs program to reduce unemployment among young African Americans and Hispanics. On health care, he would move beyond the Affordable Care Act and seek to enact a Medicare-style government-run single-payer system. On Social Security, he would expand benefits, not cut them. The Sanders cheering section on Friday filled one end of the room, and the response he received was one more sign that he has found an audience within the party and, if he can keep building on it, could threaten Clinton here and in New Hampshire. O’Malley’s eloquence The surprise of the night might have been O’Malley, the former Maryland governor and ex-mayor of Baltimore, if only because he has largely been dealt out of the narrative of the current Democratic contest. He had hoped to become the alternative to Clinton only to see Sanders take up that space. Now he languishes far behind. But he showed he has a message, too. His speech was a version of Sanders’s message but with a different style and eloquence. Sanders’s style is direct and blunt. O’Malley’s rhetoric and cadence lift in other ways, and many times he brought the whole audience from their seats cheering. “I’m not the only Democratic candidate for president who holds progressive values,” he said. “But I am the only candidate for president with 15 years of executive experience.” He said he offered the party “action not words.” He agrees with Sanders on minimum wage and trade and Social Security. He wants a major initiative to rebuild urban America. He attacks the “bullies of Wall Street” with just as much enthusiasm and edge. “We must prosecute financial crimes, and if a bank is too big to fail, too big to jail and too big to manage, then it’s too damn big and it needs to be broken up before it breaks us up,” he said to cheers and applause. Chafee and Webb Chafee and Webb provided the evening’s bookends, curiosities to many in the audience and so far barely registering in the consciousness of party activists. Chafee, the former Rhode Island governor, spoke for less than seven minutes, denouncing Republican foreign policy as “failed, arrogant, unilateral, bellicose.” He added: “We need to reject once and for all the belligerent advocates of conflict.” Webb was notable for declaring his differences with Obama on the newly negotiated nuclear agreement with Iran. And seeking to set himself apart from others, the former senator noted that he is the only candidate elected statewide in Virginia “with a union card, two purple hearts and three tattoos.” Republicans have had many such forums this year. For the Democrats, Friday was the first opportunity to see their candidates in the same room. Clinton delivered a rousing and polished speech, but Sanders and O’Malley showed there is appetite for an even harder-edge populist message among party activists. That will provide the tension as the Democratic contest evolves in the coming months. *Hillary Clinton slams Trump over criticism of McCain <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/18/hillary-clinton-slams-trump-over-mccain-comments/> // WaPo // Sean Sullivan – July 18, 2015 * At a state Democratic fundraising dinner here Saturday night, Hillary Rodham Clinton took sharp aim at Donald Trump and his Republican opponents, singling out the real estate mogul on his comments disparaging Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) over his military record. "There's nothing funny about the hate he is spewing at immigrants and their families and now the insults he has directed at a genuine war hero, Sen. John McCain," she said. Clinton said it was "shameful" that it took Trump's GOP opponents so long to "stand up to him," mostly referring to Trump's comments on immigrants. Trump spoke at a Republican fundraising dinner about an hour's drive away in Hot Springs on Friday night. "Last night the new Republican front-runner was here in Arkansas — yes Donald Trump. Finally, a candidate whose hair gets more attention than mine," quipped Clinton. *HRC** NATIONAL COVERAGE* *Clinton and Sanders Take Aim at Different Targets as Democrats Gather in Iowa <http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-and-sanders-take-aim-at-different-targets-as-democrats-gather-in-iowa-1437198606> // WSJ // Laura Meckler – July 18, 2015 * Hillary Clinton and her chief rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, Sen. Bernie Sanders, each brought Iowa Democrats to their feet Friday night in a pair of fiery speeches, though their sharp tongues were aimed at different targets. Speaking at an Iowa Democratic Party dinner, Mrs. Clinton trained her attacks on Republicans who she said would take the nation backward on the economy, health care and more. Mr. Sanders also took shots at the GOP, but he said the real problem is the nation’s “billionaire class” who take home a disproportionate amount of the money and wield a disproportionate amount of the power in the nation’s political system. “This country belongs to all of us and not a handful of billionaires,” he said. None of the needed changes would come about, he said, without a political revolution and a “mass movement coast to coast.” Mrs. Clinton’s ambitions were less sweeping: a Democratic White House that would advance the interests of families and children and the idea that people who work hard should be able to get ahead. “I’m never going to let the Republicans rip away the progress we have made,” she said. In back-to-back speeches at the state party’s annual Hall of Fame dinner, the two were joined by three others seeking the party’s nomination, the first time all five candidates have appeared on the same stage. The ballroom was filled with some 1,300 Democrats. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley also won a standing ovation as he embraced virtually every position that liberal Democrats are advocating. He said he would work to prosecute Wall Street wrongdoing, raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour, expand Social Security benefits, kill trade agreements, make college debt-free and reinstate rules that separated commercial and investment banking. “If a bank is too big to fail, too big to jail and too big to manage, then it’s too damn big and it needs to be broken up,” he said. He also tried to differentiate himself as the candidate with the most executive experience and a track record in Maryland of advancing gun control, same-sex marriage rights and other issues. But his challenge was evident from the first words out of his mouth. Mired at the bottom of polls, he sought to introduce himself. “My name is Martin O’Malley. I’m running for president. And I need your help,” he said. Two other long-shot candidates also shared the stage. Former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee sounded his support for the nuclear agreement with Iran and for the opening of diplomatic relations with Cuba. “This is the right way to make the world safer,” he said of the Iran deal. By the time former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb’s turn to speak arrived—he was last due to the alphabetical order of the speakers—dozens of people were streaming for the doors. He voiced concern about the Iran deal and highlighted his opposition to the Iraq war. “As a senator I would have never voted to authorize that invasion,” he said. That was a cloaked shot at Mrs. Clinton, who voted yes, and one of the few criticisms of any kind spoken about another candidate. Going into the evening, most of the focus was on Mrs. Clinton, the former secretary of state who remains the front-runner, and Mr. Sanders, the Vermont senator who has gained ground in recent weeks. Mrs. Clinton offered a withering attack on the GOP. She charged that Republicans would cut taxes for the rich, strip regulations for American corporations and promote “trickle-down economics,” which she called one of the worst ideas of the 1980s. “It is right up there with New Coke, shoulder pads and big hair,” she said, mixing humor with policy. “I lived through it—there are photographs—and we’re not going back to that.” Republicans argue that the economic policies under Democratic President Barack Obama have stifled growth, and are pushing for lower tax rates and fewer regulations on business, which they see as burdensome. Mrs. Clinton also joked about Republicans who deflect questions about the impact of climate change by saying they aren’t scientists. “I’m not a scientist either,” she said. “I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain.” Some Republicans doubt the scientific consensus that human activity is warming the Earth, and say mostly Democratic proposals to combat it would hurt the economy. Mr. Sanders was greeted with chants of “Bernie, Bernie” before he was even introduced. In his speech, he repeatedly denounced the concentration of wealth at the top of the income scale. “Enough is enough. That has got to end and together we will end it,” he said. “This campaign is sending a profound message to the billionaire class. You can’t have it all. You can get huge tax breaks when children in America go hungry.” He also vowed a single-payer health-care system, free tuition at public universities and to appoint Supreme Court justices who will overturn the Citizens United ruling, which allowed unlimited contributions to super PACs. “There is nothing we can’t accomplish,” he said. “Please don’t think small. Think big.” Friday also brought many Republican presidential candidates to the state. At a rally in eastern Iowa, Republican state party chair Jeff Kaufmann said, “Our message is clear to Democrats in Iowa and across the nation: The Republican Party is unified and ready to put a Republican back in the White House.” *Why Hillary Clinton is pushing to reignite Democrats in Arkansas <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/why-hillary-clinton-is-pushing-to-reignite-democrats-in-arkansas/2015/07/18/07a7b9ea-2cbc-11e5-a250-42bd812efc09_story.html> // WaPo // Sean Sullivan – July 18, 2015 * The Hillary Rodham Clinton Children’s Library and Learning Center, set on a six-acre campus here, is about a 15-minute drive away from the Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport. In between are the state capitol and the governor’s mansion, now controlled by Republicans, who also hold all six of the state’s seats in Congress. In some ways, Clinton never left the state where she served as first lady for 12 years, as she has already etched her name in Arkansas history. In others, she’s an outsider — the Democratic front-runner for president in a state that has moved sharply Republican in recent years. Clinton returns Saturday evening to try to turn things around. She will be the feature speaker at a Democratic fundraising dinner some 2,000 people are expected to attend. The visit highlights Clinton’s effort to fortify and revitalize state and local Democratic parties as she runs for president, including in areas where victories have been hard to come by in recent elections. Arkansas is perhaps the best test of how well that strategy will work. Clinton and her husband Bill are practically political royalty here, giving them an advantage that President Obama and other Democratic leaders never had. But they face stiff headwinds months after Republicans dominated the midterm elections, despite them campaigning for Democratic candidates here. Part of Clinton’s plan to help state Democrats around the country is simply showing up and boosting ticket sales to dinners. Her speech at the Jefferson-Jackson dinner in North Little Rock comes after appearances at similar dinners in New Hampshire and Virginia in recent weeks. Clinton aides say they are trying to build a broad national coalition that extends well beyond the states that vote early in the primary. Last month, the campaign said it had dispatched 51 organizers to build volunteer networks in the 46 non-early states and had held or scheduled 320 organizing meetings there. Arkansas Democratic Party chairman Vincent Insalaco said the prospect of Clinton being at the top of the ticket in 2016 has made it easier to recruit Democrats to run for state and local offices. Republicans confidently predict that Clinton, should she win the Democratic nomination, would not prevent them from winning Arkansas in the presidential election. And even the most optimistic Democrats acknowledge how difficult it would be to spring an upset. The last Democrat to carry the state was Bill Clinton in 1996. Obama lost twice by wide margins. “She cannot revitalize the party in Arkansas because the party has no future at this time,” said Arkansas Republican Party chairman Doyle Webb. “It’s suffered great losses. If you look at our success over the past three election cycles, their infrastructure is down.” The Clinton campaign, which is trying to diminish the impression that she is the inevitable Democratic nominee, says it is focused on Arkansas as part of the primary process. The state is slated to be part of a full batch of “Super Tuesday” primaries on March 1. “Hillary Clinton is committed to strengthening the Arkansas Democratic Party, and helping Democrats be successful up and down the ballot next year and beyond,” said Clinton spokesman Tyrone Gayle. The massive electoral shift toward Republicans in Arkansas, once a Democratic stronghold, is part of a broader trend in Southern states in recent years. Clinton’s allies and friends hope her résumé of local accomplishments can help ease some of their suffering at the ballot box and bring more voters into the Democratic fold. They point to her work on behalf of women, children, families and poor rural residents, citing her co-founding of Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a nonprofit advocacy group. “If you look at many of Hillary’s domestic policy initiatives and interests, you can trace them back to her work in Arkansas,” said Skip Rutherford, a longtime Clinton adviser and friend who is the dean of the University of Arkansas’s Clinton School of Public Service. Insalaco said Clinton left a defining political mark. “She was a very different first lady,” he said. “I think she helped pave the way for women to run for office in Arkansas, for women to have success in politics in Arkansas.” Republicans believe that Clinton’s accomplishments in the state will only carry her so far, since she has spent the past two decades outside of Arkansas — representing New York in the Senate from 2001 to 2009 and then serving as U.S. secretary of state for the next four years. At a Republican fundraising dinner on Friday in Hot Springs, the crowd cheered when real-estate mogul and White House hopeful Donald Trump said Clinton “deserted” Arkansas. Rutherford sees things differently. But he also sees a challenging landscape for Clinton in 2016. “The base of support for Hillary Clinton has not shrunk in Arkansas,” Rutherford said. “But the demographics have changed.” *As Democrats face off, Clinton keeps focus on GOP <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/as-democrats-face-off-clinton-keeps-focus-on-gop/> // AP – July 18, 2015 * Ignoring her primary challengers, Hillary Rodham Clinton focused instead on the expanding field of Republican contenders as she and her fellow Democrats tried to impress influential party activists in Iowa. The fundraising face-off for the benefit of the state party came Friday night as the Democratic primary fight - long assumed to be just short of a coronation for Clinton - appeared to be heating up into a slightly more serious contest. In recent weeks, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has risen in the polls and packed arenas with voters eager to hear the message of the self-described socialist who's become Clinton's chief rival. But rather than confront her most immediate political obstacle in a crucial primary state, Clinton took aim at the other party, vowing to never let Republicans "rip away the progress" made during the Obama administration. "Trickle-down economics has to be one of the worst ideas of the 1980s," Clinton said, evoking Republican policy from the Reagan era. "It is right up there with New Coke, shoulder pads and big hair." Singling out former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Clinton launched a familiar attack on his statement that Americans need to work longer hours. "Americans don't need lectures -- they need raises," she said. "So if Republicans really want to help us, why don't they join us in breaking down barriers?" Clinton additionally pledged an agenda of "small growth, fair growth, and long-term grown," because her campaign "has to be about how we unlock the potential of every American." Sanders, too, refused to criticize his primary opponent directly. Earlier in the day he edged closer to an attack when he questioned whether Clinton would back the kinds of tough regulations for Wall Street that's become a rallying call for liberal Democrats. "You'll have to ask Hillary Clinton her views on whether we should break up these large financial institutions," he said during an afternoon appearance in Cedar Rapids. At the evening forum, Sanders called for a "political revolution" fueled by a "mass movement from coast to coast" that would end the influx of money into politics and take the country off "the path to oligarchy." "The greed of the billionaire class has got to end and we are going to end it for them," he said. He added: "Please don't think small. Think big." The Clinton campaign has signaled that it considers Sanders to be a legitimate challenger who will be running for the long haul, noting the $15.2 million he's raised - largely from small donors - in the first three months of the race. They believe he will find a measure of support in Iowa, where the caucus system typically turns out the most passionate voters, and in New Hampshire, given Sanders' many decades representing neighboring Vermont in Congress. A recent Quinnipiac University poll showed that Sanders has even doubled his support in Iowa since May. On Friday, Clinton's campaign said it bought $7.7 million worth of television advertising time in early voting states, its first ad buy for the 2016 contest. In Iowa, the campaign paid $3.6 million for time in all eight media markets that serve the state. An additional $4.1 million of airtime was purchased in New Hampshire, which holds the nation's first primary. Unlike her rivals, Clinton has already built a vast campaign infrastructure, run from a multistory headquarters in New York City, with hundreds of staffers across the country. But so far the Clinton team has resisted any direct engagement with Sanders, fearing such an exchange might alienate the activists and small-dollar donors who will form the base of support in the general election if Clinton should win the nomination. "You can see that Democrats are united, we are energized, and we are ready to win this election," Clinton said Friday night. In a fiery address, she slammed the economic policy of former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, joked that businessman and TV star Donald Trump is "finally a candidate whose hair gets more attention than mine," and criticized Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker for targeting union power. "That's why we can't let Republicans take us back," Clinton said. "We're not going back to the Wild West on Wall Street. We're not going back to denying climate change." Besides Sanders and Clinton, the forum featured former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb and former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee. O'Malley introduced himself as a can-do former chief executive who tackled a series of problems in Maryland by promoting public education, freezing college tuition, passing a "Dream Act" for young immigrants and expanding family leave policies. But like Sanders, he got some of his biggest applause when he talked about regulating and punishing Wall Street - underscoring the populist mood of the most active Democratic voters. "Main Street struggles while Wall Street soars," he said. "If a bank is too big to fail, too big to jail and too big to manage, then it's too damn big." In contrast to O'Malley and Sanders, Chafee and Webb both spoke of foreign policy issues at length. Chaffee praised the contentious nuclear deal with Iran, exclaiming "What a change!" "Avoiding war is worth every bit of our energy," the Rhode Island governor added. "This is the right way to make the world safer." *Clinton Eulogizes Promoter of National Civil Rights Museum <http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/clinton-eulogizes-promoter-national-civil-rights-museum-32542244> // AP – July 18, 2015 * Former President Bill Clinton led the eulogies Saturday for D'Army Bailey, a lawyer and judge who helped preserve the Memphis hotel where civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated and turn it into the National Civil Rights Museum. Bailey died last Sunday at age 73 after a long illness. At his funeral attended by Memphis' mayor, other political leaders, lawyers and judges, Clinton heaped praise on Bailey for saving the Lorraine Motel, The Commercial Appeal (http://bit.ly/1MhNoOn) reported. "The Lorraine Motel could be a parking lot for all you know today if it hadn't been for D'Army Bailey," the former president said. "The man was moving all his life," Clinton added. "And he believed everything should have a moving purpose, including this museum. He left you and America a national treasure." Bailey led the fight to preserve the crumbling Lorraine Motel, where King was slain while standing on a balcony on April 4, 1968. King had stayed at the hotel while marching and making speeches on behalf of striking sanitation workers who were protesting low wages and unsafe working conditions. Bailey assembled donors to buy the hotel, which ultimately became the National Civil Rights Museum in 1991. The museum has since undergone an extensive renovation. Bailey received his law degree from Yale and practiced civil rights law in New York before moving to California. He served on the Berkeley, California, city council from 1971 until 1973. He later returned home to Memphis, where he practiced law and served as a judge. Bailey also had small acting roles in several films, including "The People vs. Larry Flynt" and "How Stella Got Her Groove Back." *Hillary Clinton is ignoring Bernie Sanders — and it's a smart move <http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-is-ignoring-bernie-sanders-and-its-a-smart-move-2015-7#ixzz3gImvO6dm> // AP // Lisa Lerer – July 18, 2015 * Ignoring her primary challengers, Hillary Rodham Clinton focused instead on the expanding field of Republican contenders as she and her fellow Democrats tried to impress influential party activists in Iowa. The fundraising face-off for the benefit of the state party came Friday night as the Democratic primary fight — long assumed to be just short of a coronation for Clinton — appeared to be heating up into a slightly more serious contest. In recent weeks, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has risen in the polls and packed arenas with voters eager to hear the message of the self-described socialist who's become Clinton's chief rival. But rather than confront her most immediate political obstacle in a crucial primary state, Clinton took aim at the other party, vowing to never let Republicans "rip away the progress" made during the Obama administration. "Trickle-down economics has to be one of the worst ideas of the 1980s," Clinton said, evoking Republican policy from the Reagan era. "It is right up there with New Coke, shoulder pads and big hair." Sanders, too, refused to criticize his primary opponent directly. Earlier in the day he edged closer to an attack when he questioned whether Clinton would back the kinds of tough regulations for Wall Street that's become a rallying call for liberal Democrats. "You'll have to ask Hillary Clinton her views on whether we should break up these large financial institutions," he said during an afternoon appearance in Cedar Rapids. At the evening forum, Sanders called for a "political revolution" fueled by a "mass movement from coast to coast" that would end the influx of money into politics and take the country off "the path to oligarchy." "The greed of the billionaire class has got to end and we are going to end it for them," he said. He added: "Please don't think small. Think big." The Clinton campaign has signaled that it considers Sanders to be a legitimate challenger who will be running for the long haul, noting the $15.2 million he's raised — largely from small donors — in the first three months of the race. They believe he will find a measure of support in Iowa, where the caucus system typically turns out the most passionate voters, and in New Hampshire, given Sanders' many decades representing neighboring Vermont in Congress. On Friday, Clinton's campaign said it bought $7.7 million worth of television advertising time in early voting states, its first ad buy for the 2016 contest. In Iowa, the campaign paid $3.6 million for time in all eight media markets that serve the state. An additional $4.1 million of airtime was purchased in New Hampshire, which holds the nation's first primary. Unlike her rivals, Clinton has already built a vast campaign infrastructure, run from a multistory headquarters in New York City, with hundreds of staffers across the country. But so far the Clinton team has resisted any direct engagement with Sanders, fearing such an exchange might alienate the activists and small-dollar donors who will form the base of support in the general election if Clinton should win the nomination. "You can see that Democrats are united, we are energized, and we are ready to win this election," Clinton said Friday night. In a fiery address, she slammed the economic policy of former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, joked that businessman and TV star Donald Trump is "finally a candidate whose hair gets more attention than mine," and criticized Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker for targeting union power. Besides Sanders and Clinton, the forum featured former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb and former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee. O'Malley introduced himself as a can-do former chief executive who tackled a series of problems in Maryland by promoting public education, freezing college tuition, passing a "Dream Act" for young immigrants and expanding family leave policies. *Hillary Clinton to hold private fundraiser near Pittsburgh <https://www.indianagazette.com/news/reg-national-world/hillary-clinton-to-hold-private-fundraiser-near-pittsburgh,50010333/> // AP – July 18, 2015 * Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton will attend a private fundraiser at a supporter’s home in the Pittsburgh suburbs next week. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported an email sent to Clinton supporters on Tuesday announced the fundraiser to be held at the home of community activist Cindy Shapira in Fox Chapel. The tony, wooded suburb is home to sprawling mansions and millionaires a few miles east of Pittsburgh. The event called “Conversations with Hillary” lists contribution levels of $1,000 for a “friend” on up to $27,000, which qualifies one as an “event host.” That also includes getting to attend a reception with Clinton and membership in her Hillstarters program. The newspaper reported the Wednesday fundraiser will be Clinton’s first western Pennsylvania stop since a brief Pittsburgh visit the day she announced her candidacy in April. *Hillary finds new major fundraisers to boost campaign <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/hillary-finds-new-major-fundraiser-to-boost-campaign-120314.html> // Politico // Tarini Parti & Theodoric Meyer – July 18, 2015 * Hillary Clinton’s campaign has drawn in dozens of new bundlers who have raised $100,000 or more for her presidential campaign, though several big-name Democratic donors have not yet stepped up as major fundraisers. Since launching her campaign three months ago, Clinton has attracted fundraising help from donors who did not bundle for either of President Barack Obama’s campaigns, according to a POLITICO analysis of a list of more than 100 “Hillblazers” — or top bundlers — voluntarily disclosed by the campaign this week. About 40 percent of her donors did not serve as bundlers for Clinton’s previous campaign or either of Obama’s presidential campaigns. And only about seven percent of those who bundled at least $100,000 for Obama in 2012 have raised that much for Clinton. The absence from Clinton’s campaign bundler list, however, may mean that deep-pocketed donors have chosen another route of candidate support. In this presidential election, outside groups are already overshadowing official campaigns, and some major bundlers from previous elections may have opted to write big checks to Priorities USA Action, a super PAC supporting Clinton. Those details will not be made public until the end of July. Bundlers pull together individual contributions capped at $2,700 — the federal limit for individuals in the primary — and their efforts can add up to big money. The fundraising is more time-consuming for wealthy donors than simply writing six- or seven-figure checks to super PACs, but inclusion on a campaign bundler list often comes with perks that give donors inside access. This week, for example, Hillblazers were treated to four hours of face time with top campaign officials at a Brooklyn Marriott hotel close to Clinton’s headquarters. Overall, with money raised from the bundlers, Clinton’s campaign reported collecting roughly $47.5 million in the last three months. Super PACs operate with no restrictions on fundraising, but they are not allowed to coordinate with campaigns. Super PAC reports to the Federal Election Commission will offer a more complete picture of Clinton’s big donor support. “The sad reality of super PACs is that if the impact a bundler can make is waning, the influence of grassroots donors is exceedingly diminished,” said Bill Burton, who co-founded Priorities in the 2012 election cycle when it was supporting Obama. “But it’s important to note that bundlers are still critically important to the success of a campaign operation. Without them, no presidential campaign can raise the funds needed to be successful.” The boldface names of Democratic donors missing from Clinton’s bundler list include billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer; Hollywood moguls Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg; former Clinton adviser Vernon Jordan; Qualcomm founder Irwin Jacobs; Chicago Cubs co-owner Laura Ricketts; billionaire Warren Buffett; Salesforce founder Marc Benioff; and Vogue editor-in-chief Anna Wintour. Most of them did show up as $2,700 contributors to Clinton, the maximum primary contribution. Some have even hosted Clinton fundraisers. But none have so far raised six-figures for Clinton, as they have done in past presidential elections. Steyer hosted a fundraiser for Clinton at his San Francisco mansion in April. Ricketts co-hosted an event for the Democratic frontrunner in Chicago in May, and Jacobs is expected to host an August fundraiser. Some new Clinton bundlers include lobbyists, who were barred from contributing to the Obama campaigns, and have been quick to return to Democratic presidential politics by raising cash for Clinton. They include Washington lobbyists Steve Elmendorf, David Jones, Jay Dunn, former Albuquerque Mayor Martin Chavez and former South Carolina Gov. James Hodges. Other new bundlers are women like Allida Black, co-founder of the Ready for Hillary super PAC that laid the foundation for Clinton’s White House bid, and former Clinton press secretary Lisa Caputo. Black, a first-time bundler, said she’s raised $117,000 so far for Clinton’s bid and hopes to raise more. “It’s too important for me to stop. I think it’s the most important election of my lifetime, and I think Hillary is someone I’ve watched since the early 70s, known since the 90s, and she is the candidate of my lifetime when it comes to issues I care about. So I have to put my money where my mouth is,” Black said. “The thing I’m enormously proud of is that a boat load of my money came from small-dollar donors,” Black added. “My donors gave anywhere from $20 to $1,000, $500. Some even gave $5. I reached out to everyone I know because I wanted people to invest because its important to me and the country and important for Hillary. I find that men are receptive and women are eager.” Pamela Eakes, who has bundled for Obama and Clinton, told POLITICO in a recent interview that Clinton supporters tried to encourage women who lack money to write large super PAC checks to jump into fundraising. “Strategically, we’re doing what we’ve done for years,” said Eakes, a major donor based in Seattle. “We’ve always reached out to women. This time the most qualified person to be president happens to be a woman and a mother. So it’s not strategic, it’s just natural.” Some of the Hillblazers are Clinton supporters who did not bundle for Obama. Now, they are making a comeback. They include Tracy Bernstein, who sits on the board of the nonprofit Sasha Bruce; Espirit co-founder Susie Tompkins Buell; longtime supporter and Clinton Foundation donor Lynn Forester de Rothschild; and Univision owner Haim Saban and his wife Cheryl. Clinton is the only 2016 candidate so far to release bundler names. Disclosure is voluntary, and campaigns that name their bundlers typically don’t provide exact amounts they’ve raised or their addresses and occupations, as campaigns are required to do for reports filed to the FEC. GOP presidential contenders Jeb Bush and Scott Walker have said they will also voluntarily disclose their bundlers, but have not yet released the information. *Hillary Clinton slams Trump’s ‘shameful’ comments on McCain’s war record <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/hillary-clinton-slams-trumps-shameful-comments-on-mccains-war-record-120321.html#ixzz3gJVT6vuL> // Politico // Annie Karni – July 18, 2015 * Hillary Clinton sharply rebuked Donald Trump on Saturday for his “shameful” comments that Sen. John McCain was not a war hero because he was captured in Vietnam. Clinton also moved quickly to erase any daylight between Trump and the rest of the GOP field, where the real-estate mogul and reality television personality has moved from sideshow to the current leader in the polls. “Donald Trump, finally a candidate whose hair gets more attention than mine,” Clinton quipped at a Democratic dinner here. “But there’s nothing funny about the hate he is spewing at immigrants and families — and now the insults he has directed at a genuine war hero, Sen. John McCain. “It’s shameful, and so is the fact that it took so long for his fellow Republican candidates to start standing up to him,” she said. “The sad truth is if you look at many of their policies, it can be hard to tell the difference.” Clinton made her comments at the annual Jefferson-Jackson dinner in Little Rock, in front of a crowd of about 1,500 Democrats. It was a brief, half-day homecoming for Clinton, her first visit to her de facto home state since she announced her candidacy in April. In her keynote address, she gave an impassioned version of her stump speech, talking about paid leave, childcare, equal pay for equal work, universal preschool, and refinancing student debt. She reiterated her promise to hold individuals on Wall Street accountable for actions that lead to economic crises. And she criticized the Republican field as a generic whole. “They may have some fresh faces, but they are the party of the past,” she said. “Trickle-down economics has to be one of the worst ideas of the 1980s. It is right up there with New Coke, shoulder pads and big hair. I lived through that. There are photographs. And believe me we’re not going back.” After arriving in town late Saturday afternoon, Clinton visited the house she and Bill Clinton lived in when they first moved to Little Rock from Fayetteville, after Bill Clinton was elected state attorney general in 1977. She also made a brief stop at the Clinton Presidential Center, and drove by their old 1992 campaign headquarters, before arriving at the Verizon Center to keynote the dinner. She was scheduled to fly out Saturday night after her speech, an aide said. Arkansas has changed dramatically since the Clintons were the stars of the state’s Democratic Party more than three decades ago. Democrats have been trounced here in recent elections, where the GOP now holds a majority at all levels of government in a state that used to be a Democratic stronghold. In his 2012 reelection campaign, President Barack Obama lost Arkansas by 24 points. Former Democratic governor and close Clinton ally Mike Beebe, the one stalwart Democratic survivor, left office in January after he was term-limited out. The changing politics of Arkansas were on display Friday night, where Trump was warmly received by a crowd of over 1,000 Republicans at a GOP dinner in Hot Springs, Bill Clinton’s boyhood home. But inside the overly air-conditioned Verizon Center, state Democrats were trying to keep both the pounding heat and the bleak political map out. “I’m here to tell you the Democratic party is alive and well in Arkansas!” said state Democratic Party chairman Vince Insalaco. For her part, Clinton acknowledged that last year was “a hard one for Democrats” in Arkansas. But she put a positive spin on it. “Don’t forget, voters did come out and pass an increase in the minimum wage,” she said. “Arkansas voters know paychecks need to grow. We just have to offer a plan for more growth and more fairness they can believe in and vote for.” The arena was filled with longtime Clinton allies like Beebe; Mack McLarty, who served as White House chief of staff; former Sen. Blanche Lincoln; former Sen. David Pryor; Gen. Wesley Clark; and Lynda Dixon, Bill Clinton’s former personal secretary during his years as Arkansas governor, among others. The crowd was thrilled to welcome Clinton home — a large portrait of the former Secretary of State was sold at a pre-dinner auction for $19,000. Speaking to reporters before Clinton took the stage, Beebe said Democrats are suffering because Arkansans are “mad at the White House. They’re mad at the president, in Arkansas.” But he said Clinton can distance herself from Obama without being disloyal to a president she served under. “She can row her own boat,” he said. “She will be loyal, as she should be. She has her own plans, her own policies.” He also acknowledged that Trump’s entry into the race is good for Clinton. “Good, I hope he wins,” he said when asked about Trump’s large and supportive crowd here Friday night. As for whether Clinton could win here, he acknowledged in today’s environment, “it will be difficult, but yes. If anyone on that side of the aisle right now [has a chance,] she does. but it will be an uphill battle because the state has gone significantly red.” *Hillary Clinton Calls Donald Trump Comments 'Shameful' <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-19/hillary-clinton-on-donald-trump-s-mccain-comments-it-s-shameful-> // Bloomberg // Jennifer Epstein – July 18, 2015 * Donald Trump's dismissive comments about Senator John McCain's military service in the Vietnam War were "shameful," Hillary Clinton said Saturday, joining most of her would-be Republican presidential rivals in defending the former prisoner of war. Hours after the real estate mogul-turned presidential candidate set off an uproar in the Republican party with his suggestion that McCain, who spent more than five years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, was "not a war hero," Clinton lambasted Trump in a speech at the Arkansas Democratic Party's annual Jefferson-Jackson dinner. Clinton, who served in the Senate with McCain, broadened her critique of Trump beyond his comments about the Arizona senator to include Trump's incendiary remarks about immigration — which set off his feud with McCain. "There's nothing funny about the insults he's directed at a genuine war hero." "There is nothing funny about" how Trump has talked about immigrants or "the insults he's directed at a genuine war hero, Senator John McCain," Clinton told her audience in North Little Rock. "It's shameful." Noting the deference many Republicans have accorded the outspoken billionaire, whose take-no-prisoners speaking style has rocketed him towards the top of his party's presidential field, Clinton questioned why it "took so long for most of his fellow Republican candidates to stand up to him." Some Republicans, including McCain, have publicly disagreed with Trump's comments on immigration, including a charge that Mexicans illegally crossing the border are "rapists." But it was not until Trump attacked McCain, the 2008 Republican presidential nominee, that condemnation became more vocal and widespread. Almost every major Republican candidate running for president, with the notable exception of Texas Senator Ted Cruz, rounded on Trump Saturday after he pooh-poohed McCain's time in the infamous Hanoi Hilton, where the the Navy pilot was tortured to the point where he says he considered suicide. “He’s not a war hero," Trump told a gathering of evangelicals in Ames, Iowa. "He’s a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured." In her visit to North Little Rock, which brought her back to the state where she was once first lady, Clinton also commented on Thursday's shooting in Chattanooga, Tennessee. A Marine from Arkansas was among the five people killed by a gunman who opened fire at two military facilities there. The incident "breaks our hearts but it also stiffens our resolve," she said. "We will not be intimidated by terrorists. We’ll be strong, we’ll be smart and we’ll defend our country and our values." *Hillary Clinton Condemns Donald Trump’s ‘Insults’ of ‘Genuine War Hero’ John McCain <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-condemns-donald-trumps-insults-genuine-war/story?id=32543623> // ABC News // Liz Kreutz – July 18, 2015 * Leave it to Donald Trump to help Republicans and Democrats find common ground. Hillary Clinton joined the chorus of presidential candidates from both parties Saturday to condemn Trump for saying Sen. John McCain, a decorated Vietnam War veteran, was not a war hero. During her headlining speech at a Democratic dinner in Little Rock, Ark. Clinton called Trump’s assertion “shameful” and described McCain as a “genuine war hero.” “Donald Trump, finally a candidate whose hair gets more attention that mine,” Clinton quipped. “But, there’s nothing funny about the hate he is spewing at immigrants and their families, and now the insults he’s directed at a genuine war hero, Senator John McCain,” she added. “It’s shameful, and so is the fact that it took so long for most of his fellow Republican candidates to start standing up to him.” Earlier today, Trump came under fire for saying at a campaign event in Iowa that McCain is only a war hero “because he was captured.” The comment has drawn criticism from a slew of his Republican presidential challengers, as well as Clinton and Secretary of State John Kerry. “I have known John McCain for more than thirty years. We've had our share of disagreements and still do today. But one thing I know is beyond debate is that John McCain is a hero, a man of grit and guts and character personified,” Kerry said in a statement released tonight. McCain spent five and a half years as a POW after he was captured in 1967 while flying his 23rd bombing mission over North Vietnam. His aircraft was shot down by a missile and he nearly drowned landing in a lake. He had his shoulder crushed by his captors, who refused to treat his injuries, which were exacerbated by beatings administered during interrogations. He survived a program of severe torture and his wartime injuries restrict him from lifting his arms above his head. Clinton made her attack against Trump during her first trip back to Arkansas since becoming a presidential candidate. In her speech, Clinton attacked the GOP for being the “party of the past.” She also reminisced fondly about her years spent in Little Rock. Looking out at the many familiar faces she saw in the crowd, Clinton thanked her longtime friends: “I hope you know that you mean the world to me and my family,” she said. *At first cattle call, Democrats hone name-free Clinton attacks <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/18/politics/iowa-democratic-party-candidates/> // CNN // Dan Merica – July 18, 2015 * Hillary Clinton's opponents didn't have to use her name in order to launch attacks against the Democratic frontrunner at Friday night's Iowa Democratic Party Hall of Fame dinner. The pluses and minuses of Clinton's frontrunner status were on full display at the dinner. The 1,300-person audience was largely dominated by Clinton supporters, who hooped and hollered throughout her speech. But the fact that she leads every national and state poll was also the reason her opponents honed all of their rhetorical fire against Clinton, not the four other Democrats in attendance. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley was the most aggressive at targeting Clinton during the first event of the presidential campaign to include all five Democratic candidates -- O'Malley, Clinton, former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. The former Maryland governor sprinkled his speech with subtle knocks against positions Clinton has taken and areas where the governor's team feels she is weak. "We didn't just talk about it, we actually got it done," O'Malley said, casting himself as the only candidate with 15 years of executive experience. The line, while biographical, is also meant to knock Clinton, who O'Malley's campaign believes is all talk but no action when it comes to progressives issues. O'Malley also subtly knocked Clinton on minimum wage, trade and energy. "I am the first candidate but I am not the last" to call for a 100% clean electric grid by 2050, he said, seemingly alluding to the fact Clinton would not commit to climate change demands at an event Thursday in New Hampshire. On trade, O'Malley hit the North American Free Trade Agreement, a trade law that was approved under President Bill Clinton's administration but is deplored by unions. "Many of you remember the return of NAFTA. It was nada," he said. Asked by CNN afterward whether the lines were directed at Clinton, O'Malley said, "No, they're directed at our country's future." He added later, "I'm offering my candidacy and I'm highlighting the things that I've done. And I hope each of the candidates will highlight the things that they have done. One of the things that I have done is accomplish many of the progressive goals and values that the rest of the field is committed to, and I don't doubt their sincerity ... but I actually have the experience in having gotten that done. That's a distinguishing characteristic that I offer, but it's up to the people to decide." Clinton, for her part, did not return the attacks, instead choosing to use her 15 minutes to describe the reason she was running, attack Republicans and stress the importance of building up the Democratic Party. "We Democrats are in the future business. But from the Republican candidates for president, we see the opposite," Clinton said. "Now they may have some fresh faces, but they are the party of the past." Clinton even reached back to Republicans of presidencies past, calling "trickle-down" economics "one of the worst ideas of the 1980s," one that is "right up there with New Coke, shoulder pads and big hair." "I lived through it," she said, "and there are photographs, and we are not going back to that." Clinton also looked to sum the entire 15-person Republican field into one candidate: Donald Trump, the businessman whose bombastic statements about Mexicans have revolted most Democrats and many Republicans. Calling him the "new Republican frontrunner" -- a nod to his standing in the polls -- Clinton said she was happy there is "finally a candidate whose hair gets more attention than mine." Her only mention of her Democratic opponents was at the top of her speech when she said she was happy to be there with "my fellow candidates." That was true for all candidates except for Webb, who notably complimented Sanders multiple times in his speech. "Bernie, you always fire me up," Webb said of the blunt independent senator. Webb told CNN after the speech that there was "no real strategy" to heralding Sanders. "I think Bernie Sanders raises a lot of good issues to be discussed," he said. "I wouldn't necessarily agree with all of his solutions." Webb noted in his speech that if he were president, he would have "never urged the invasion of Iraq." Clinton in 2002 voted to authorize military action in Iraq, a decision that hurt her mightily in her failed 2008 presidential bid. Webb also said he wouldn't have used "military force in Libya during what was called the 'Arab Spring.'" Clinton advocated military force in Libya while she was secretary of state. But O'Malley and Webb were not the only Democrats to knock Clinton. Going into the event, Clinton's aides anticipated that their candidate would draw much of the fire. After the speech, all said that they were surprised O'Malley didn't hit Clinton harder. And other Democrats knocked the frontrunner without naming her. Sanders, the candidate surging in the polls both nationally and in Iowa, did not attack Clinton. Around 200 supporters at 20 tables backed Sanders, who delivered a stump speech that promised universal health care, tuition-free college and a breakup of the big banks. Chafee opened the event, but only spoke for six minutes, less than half the 15 minutes allotted to each candidate. He used his speech to introduce himself to the audience and outline his views on climate, war and raising the minimum wage. He received a polite response, but nowhere near the excitement generated by Clinton, O'Malley and Sanders. The sheer fact that all Democrats were at Friday night's event was notable. Republicans have had cattle calls -- events that bring a high number of candidates -- nearly every week, but this was the first of the Democratic nomination fight. *'Older,' 'Wiser,' 'Richer' Donald Trump Would Be Better President Than Hillary Clinton, Bill Kristol Says <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bill-kristol-older-wiser-richer-donald-trump-potus/story?id=32524822> // ABC News // Ben Bell – July 18, 2015 * Real estate mogul Donald Trump would make a better president than Hillary Clinton, Bill Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, told ABC News. Kristol, who joins the "This Week" roundtable Sunday and is also an ABC News contributor, shared his thoughts on the 2016 race for president, the Iran nuclear deal struck this week and more over email. 1. Is Donald Trump helping or hurting the Republican Party? Also, what are Trump’s chances for capturing the Republican nomination for president? Kristol: Trump's chances of being the GOP nominee are small but not nonexistent. And he's not hurting the GOP, and is probably helping by broadening the tent. Incidentally, if you look at match-ups of the various GOP possibilities with Hillary Clinton, they're doing no worse today than before Trump emerged. So what evidence is there -- as opposed to knee-jerk conventional wisdom -- that he's hurting the GOP? 2. Would Donald Trump make a better president than Hillary Clinton? Kristol: Yes. After all, he's older, wiser, and richer! 3. You called the nuclear deal struck with Iran this week “a deal worse than even we imagined possible.” So, what would have been your alternate plan? Do you see this development changing Israel’s view on a potential military strike? Kristol: The alternative would be to keep the sanctions in place (or perhaps ratchet them up), increase diplomatic and political pressure on the regime, keep on sabotaging the nuclear program, etc. 'This Week' Powerhouse Puzzlers: Test Your Knowledge The Clintons: Then and Now 4. Looking outside those who are openly seeking the White House, who do you think will be closely looked at for the VP spot on the eventual Republican ticket for president? Kristol: GOP VP's: Rubio (if not the nominee), Martinez, Ayotte, Kasich, Cotton. 5. How do you see the issue of gay marriage playing in this election? Should GOP candidates focus on it? Kristol: Probably not a big issue, and probably not one GOP candidates will focus on. The Supreme Court and the Constitution ("judicial supremacy") could be a big issue, though. *Clinton, Sanders share the stage in Iowa <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/dem-primaries/248418-clinton-sanders-share-the-stage-in-iowa> // The Hill // Elliot Smilowitz – July 18, 2015 * Democratic presidential candidates shared the stage at a party event in Iowa on Friday night, but rather than take aim at each other, they took turns attacking Republicans. The Iowa Democratic Party Hall of Fame dinner was a shared platform for five 2016 contenders — Hillary Clinton, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee and former Sen. Jim Webb, according to the Associated Press. Clinton, the primary’s leader in the polls, also led the way in GOP attacks, accusing Republicans of trying to “rip away the progress we have made” and bring back Reagan-era policies. "Trickle-down economics has to be one of the worst ideas of the 1980s," she said. "It is right up there with New Coke, shoulder pads and big hair." Clinton took particular aim at businessman Donald Trump, who has rocketed to the top of many Republican presidential polls. “Finally, a candidate whose hair gets more attention than mine,” she joked. “But there’s nothing funny about the hate he is spewing about immigrants and their families,” Clinton added. “It really is shameful.” She also called out by name Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker for his battles to declaw labor unions, as well as former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush for his economic policy. Sanders used his speech to evoke populist messages, saying “the greed of the billionaire class has got to end — and we are going to end it for them.” He called for a “political revolution” to end big money in politics, and a renewed focus on helping the little guy. “The issue of wealth and income inequality is the great moral issue of the time, the great economic issue of our timethe great political issue of our time,” he said. O’Malley touted his liberal record in Maryland on immigration, education, gay marriage and the minimum wage. “We didn’t just talk about it,” he said. “We got it done.” He also joined the other candidates in attacking Wall Street. "If a bank is too big to fail, too big to jail and too big to manage, then it's too damn big,” O’Malley said. *Hillary Clinton turns up the heat as Iowa takes on general election feel <http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/18/hillary-clinton-iowa-bernie-sanders-martin-omalley> // The Guardian // Ben Jacobs – July 18, 2015 * With Hillary Clinton maintaining a strong lead in the polls in the first-in-the-nation caucus state, her campaign is increasingly looking like a “post-caucus” operation, focused on the general election. At the Iowa Democratic party’s Hall of Fame dinner in Cedar Rapids on Friday night, the first time all five declared Democratic candidates for the White House were together on one stage, Clinton gave a fiery speech which almost seemed more appropriate for a general election rally than an attempt to rally the base. The former secretary of state seemed to ignore not just her Democratic opponents but the host of issues raising debate on the left, from student loans to a $15 minimum wage. Instead, Clinton attacked three Republican presidential candidates – Donald Trump, Scott Walker and Jeb Bush – by name while also criticizing unnamed people who dismissed her emphasis on women’s issues. In contrast, her chief Democratic rivals, former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley and Vermont senator Bernie Sanders, both hit a list of progressive hobby horses, including minimum wage and immigration reform. Sanders got a rapturous reception from fans who started cheering before his name was mentioned, continued through his call for “a political revolution” in the US and all the way through the time he sat down. Both mentioned conservatives – Trump in O’Malley’s case and the Koch Brothers for Sanders – but they presented them simply as symbols of what they found morally abhorrent, rather than as potential electoral opponents. The “general election” approach was nothing new for Clinton. In a rally before the event, held in a steamy basement underneath the Veterans Memorial building, she delivered a fiery speech to a crowd of more than 300, attacking Republican economic plans by stating “we’ve trickled on enough” and warning of the dire consequences of a GOP president in 2016. “It was awesome,” said local state representative Art Staed. The room had a pep rally feel as a number of Clinton organizers took the stage to fire up the crowd and pass the time until the former secretary of state arrived. While the campaign provided free pizza, they charged for water, soda and even alcoholic beverages. In the rather warm room, water quickly sold out. The crowd featured a mix of Clinton loyalists and those curious to see the Democratic candidate in the flesh on a relatively rare public appearance in Iowa. Vlora Ajeti came from Illinois. A Kosovan American, she said she would be forever grateful to the Clinton family for what Bill Clinton did for Kosovo. In contrast, Linda Early of Cedar Rapids said of Clinton: “She’s as good as the others.” Early seemed supportive but not exactly converted to the cause. In Iowa, Clinton has mostly used roundtables or private gatherings with invited guests. With the exception of one fundraiser in the fall of 2014, she did not set foot in the state between her 2008 loss in the Iowa caucuses and the April announcement of her candidacy for 2016. She did not campaign on behalf of local Democrats or show up at party events. However, her campaign has been organizing in the state, putting together a massive footprint. The room at the Hall of Fame dinner felt that Clinton influence. Reporters were penned off, either because mixing press and attendees presented security issues – according to the secret service – or to “allow the event to move along”, according to a spokesman for the Iowa Democratic Party. This represented a major shift, according to one Iowa Democratic insider, from past practice at party events. This did not mean that there were no old-fashioned politics at the event. On the street outside, a sign war was waged between supporters of Clinton and O’Malley in the nearly 100F heat. Staffers from both campaigns waved signs and shouted cheers. Unsurprisingly, Clinton had more people – O’Malley supporters, divided between those affiliated with his campaign and his Super Pac, struggled mightily to stay competitive. The Sanders campaign did not have any such presence. Instead, 37 supporters stayed in the air conditioning and got to meet the candidate. Sanders has built a devoted fanbase, similar in some ways to that of the libertarian Ron Paul in 2008 and 2012. Sanders supporters showed up the dinner covered in paraphernalia. Clinton or O’Malley supporters might be happy with a sticker – Sanders fans were wearing T-shirts. The Vermont senator, who held a veterans’ event earlier on Friday, has built a following so devoted that at least one attendee had flown halfway across the country to see him. Claire Harrison had flown in from California. She told the Guardian “I wanted to hear him” and said she had combined the trip with a visit with a friend in Omaha. Sanders has built a robust state operation around Pete D’Alessandro, a veteran Iowa operative. While he has not quite run a traditional Democratic caucus campaign, Sanders has still been a frequent visitor who has been showing up in the state for more than a year. Like Barack Obama, he is building a passionate following composed of traditional lefties and first-time caucus goers. Jay Lion of Spencer, Iowa, told the Guardian he had specifically changed his registration from Independent to Democratic in order to caucus for Sanders. A former factory worker currently on disability while getting dialysis treatment, he said he had been waiting to support Sanders for president since he first saw the Vermonter on C-Span in 2002. O’Malley has long been running a traditional caucus effort in Iowa. He has repeatedly visited the state, dispatching staffers to work on various Democratic campaigns in 2014 there and doling out money to local Democrats. At an event held on Thursday night in Ottumwa, the Marylander spoke to a crowd of about 40 who gathered in a hotel ballroom. He emphasized his progressive bona fides, telling attendees: “I think we should raise the minimum wage to $15 wherever we can – however we can.” The evening felt far more like a traditional Iowa caucus event, in which candidates go out of their way to court local Democrats. O’Malley walked into the room with a birthday cake for the local county chair – his campaign left with a signed supporter card from her. At the Ottumwa event, Joe Judge, the chair of the local Democratic party in rural Monroe County who was leaning towards O’Malley, told the Guardian he thought O’Malley was the only Democratic candidate who could win a general election in his area. A loyal Obama supporter who had met all three candidates, he said he simply thought after due consideration that Clinton and Sanders would lose the rural, heavily Irish area to a Republican in November 2016 – but that O’Malley could win. At the Hall of Fame diner on Friday, the crowd cheered all three candidates – each of the three campaigns had purchased 200 tickets for supporters. The question, though, remained: which candidate will Iowa Democrats support in February? Given changes in the way candidates are campaigning, the vote could determine not only the future of the nation, but the future of the Iowa caucus as well. *Hillary Clinton delivers fiery speech at Democratic party hall of fame dinner* <http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/18/hillary-clinton-delivers-fiery-speech-at-democratic-party-hall-of-fame-dinner>* // The Guardian // Ben Jacobs – July 18, 2015 * Hillary Clinton delivered a fiery barn burner to a gathering of more than 1,300 Iowa Democrats Friday night. At a Democratic party hall of fame dinner in Cedar Rapids, Clinton attacked three Republican presidential candidates by name as well as railing against Iowa’s Republican governor, Terry Branstad. The Democratic frontrunner did not mention any of her opponents in the Democratic primary by name. The speech felt more like a general election address with Clinton going after both Jeb Bush and Scott Walker by name and arguing Democrats “are in the future business … but [the Republicans] are the party of the past”. But perhaps the best applause came for her attack on the state’s Republican governor who is currently in a showdown with the state legislature after vetoing education funding. The former US secretary of state built on her typical stump speech by delivering a series of cable news ready zingers towards conservatives. Clinton mocked those Republicans who express skepticism about climate change by claiming “I’m not a scientist” by declaring: “I am not a scientist either. I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain and I am not going to let them take us backwards.” The former secretary of state also took a jibe at the GOP’s economical policy, saying “trickle down economics was one of worst ideas of 1980s along with New Coke, shoulder pads and big hair”. Clinton also took care to emphasize her work on women’s issues, highlighting the struggles of her mother’s impoverished childhood and her work as a young lawyer at the Children’s Defense Fund. *Elizabeth Warren Gives Hillary Clinton Economic Advice (Sort Of) In a Fiery Public Speech* <http://www.bustle.com/articles/98135-elizabeth-warren-gives-hillary-clinton-economic-advice-sort-of-in-a-fiery-public-speech>* // Bustle // Lauren Barbato – July 18, 2015 * Days after Hillary Clinton delivered her first major campaign speech on economic issues, Sen. Elizabeth Warren took to the Netroots Nation stage on Friday to fulfill her role as America’s progressive savior — but the Donald Trumps and Sarah Palins of the Republican Party weren’t her only targets. In a passionate headlining address at the gathering of progressive activists, Warren seemingly gave Hillary Clinton some economic advice <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/elizabeth-warren-netroots-nation-presidential-requirements-120298.html>, including a stark ultimatum about Wall Street politics. The Massachusetts senator’s pointed words will likely raise some eyebrows in the Democratic Party, especially as Clinton’s biggest challenger, the progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders, continues to see his popularity surge. We probably shouldn’t be too surprised over Warren’s speech. The senator, who has publicly supported both Clinton and her friend Sanders in the past, hardly shies away from calling out those in her own party. But the timing, of course, is obvious: Was Warren not impressed with Clinton’s recently revealed economic plan, which was hailed by many writers and news outlets as “fiery <http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/18/hillary-clinton-delivers-fiery-speech-at-democratic-party-hall-of-fame-dinner>,” feminist,” “pro-immigrant” and even “progressive <http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/12-progressive-promises-from-hillary-clintons-economic-speech-20150713> ”? Here’s a look at where Clinton and Warren may differ on economic reform — and what Warren wants Clinton to do about it if she wins the White House in 2016: Wall Street In The White House As we know, Warren isn’t that popular on Wall Street, but Wall Street loves Clinton. Or they loved the old Clinton, anyway. On Monday, Clinton took a harsher stance on her former allies and backers, saying: As a former senator from New York, I know firsthand the role that Wall Street can and should play in our economy, helping main street grow and prosper, and boosting new companies that make America more competitive globally. But as we all know in the years before the crash, financial firms piled risk upon risk, and regulators in Washington either could not or would not keep up. I was alarmed by this gathering storm and called for addressing the risks of derivatives, cracking down on subprime mortgages and improving financial oversight. Under President Obama’s leadership we have imposed tough new rules that deal with some of the challenges on Wall Street. Those rules have been under assault by Republicans in Congress and those running for president. I will fight back against these attacks and protect the reforms we have made. We can do that, and still ease burdens on community banks to encourage responsible loans to local people and businesses they know and trust. But perhaps Warren wasn’t convinced. The Massachusetts senator told the large crowd at Netroots Nation: I think anyone running for that job — anyone who wants the power to make every key economic appointment and nomination across the federal government — should say loud and clear that they agree: We don’t run this country for Wall Street and mega corporations. We run it for people. Beyond Dodd-Frank Both Warren and Clinton brought up Dodd-Frank, the Wall Street-consumer protection legislation passed in the wake of the financial collapse and recession. “Progressives believe that Wall Street needs stronger rules and tougher legal enforcement — and that, five years after Dodd-Frank — it’s time to stop pretending and really end ‘too big to fail’ with rules like the Glass-Steagall Act,” Warren said Friday, referring to the Great Depression-era legislation that she wants to revive. Sanders recently said he would support Warren’s new Glass-Steagall Act <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/15/politics/elizabeth-warren-hillary-clinton-glass-steagall/>, but Clinton advisers said this week that she would not support the reform. Coincidentally, it was Clinton’s husband, Bill, who repealed the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, after nearly 60 years of economic reform. Although she has wavered on Glass-Steagall, Clinton did address more Wall Street regulation in her sweeping economic address, though the promises were vague. Clinton said Monday: We also have to go beyond Dodd-Frank. Too many of our major financial institutions are still too complex and too risky. And the problems are not limited to the big banks that get all the headlines. Serious risks are emerging from institutions in the so-called shadow banking system, including hedge funds, high-frequency traders, non- bank finance companies. So many new kinds of entities, which receive little oversight at all. Boosting The Middle Class Warren has made middle-class Americans the crux of her career, so it’s no surprise she said on Friday that she wants a president who will “embrace the kind of ambitious economic policies that we need to rebuild opportunity and a strong middle class in this country.” Will this person be Clinton? Well, it seems the middle class is the focus of Clinton’s campaign, and her recent speech drove at least one point home: Wages. Wages. And more wages. “The defining economic challenge of our time clear. We must raise incomes for hard-working Americans, so they can afford a middle-class life,” Clinton said in her speech Monday. “We must drive steady income growth that lifts up families, and lifts up our country. And that will be my mission, from the first day I am president to the last.” *Hillary Forbids Young Supporters from Talking to Press <http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/hillary-forbids-young-supporters-talking-press_993050.html> // The Weekly Standard // Daniel Halper – July 18, 2015 * "Here's what struck me," said Susan Page of USA Today, "when I read the coverage in the Des Moines Register this morning. Jennifer Jacobs, who's been on your show, was covering this last night. Big demonstrations outside of young people for O'Malley and Hillary Clinton. She went up to the Clinton supporters -- these are protesters for Clinton -- and they were told they were not allowed to [speak to] a reporter." Page continued, "Now, why in the world would the campaign tell their own supporters who came out to campaign in favor Hillary Clinton ... these are the young people, college kids, for Hillary, and they've been told they can't talk to reporters. Why in the world would you do that? "This raises some warning flags for Hillary Clinton campaign that is trying to control their supporters." *Together the First Time, Hillary Clinton and Her Rival 2016 Democrats Still Play Nice <http://www.nationaljournal.com/2016-elections/all-together-the-first-time-hillary-clinton-and-her-democratic-2016-rivals-still-play-nice-20150718> // The National Journal // Emily Schultheis – July 18, 2015 * It had all the makings of a showdown: after months in each other's footsteps on the campaign trail, all five 2016 Democratic presidential contenders were gathered in the same room for the first time Friday night, ready to stand in front of each other and tell a 1,300-strong crowd why they,and not their rivals, should get the party's presidential nod. But when the five—Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Martin O'Malley, Jim Webb and Lincoln Chafee—spoke here tonight, there was little rancor to be found. Instead, the candidates took turns touting their own credentials, occasionally praising each other, and ripping into the Republican 2016 field. "You can see that Democrats are united, we are energized and we are ready to win this election," Clinton said. Indeed, throughout the evening—the fundraiser for the state Democratic party—was remarkably free of intra-party fireworks. The five candidates refrained from criticizing each other in any explicit way. In fact, the only one of them who even uttered an opponent's name was Webb, whose speech directly followed followed Sanders and made several praising references to him. Some of the others, including Sanders and Chafee, made general references to the other Democrats in attendance without naming any names. Sanders, for example, spoke of "great Democrats who have dedicated their entire lives to public service." "This is a great team and I thank them all," he said. Unlike the Republicans, who have gathered at a handful of cattle call-style events across the country this year—and will appear on stage in Ohio together at their first debate in just a few weeks—Democrats have not held similar events. Instead, the gathering of presidential hopefuls focused their attention on the Republican Party, offering up criticisms of the 2016 GOP field and framing the party's philosophy as a whole as outdated. The five candidates spoke alphabetically, which meant Chafee was first, followed by Clinton. When she came on stage, supporters began chanting, "Hil-lar-y! Hil-lar-y!" Clinton told some personal stories in her speech, touching on frequently-cited anecdotes about becoming a grandmother and her mother's struggles as a young girl. But she saved most of her comments for criticism of the Republican Party. "I am running for everyone who's ever been knocked down but refused to be knocked out," she said. In closing, she hoped for a country "where a father can tell his daughter you can be anything you want to be, even President of the United States." Sanders' vocal and enthusiastic supporters, who have been drawing him big crowds and are beginning to form the basis for his campaign's organization here in Iowa, The chants for Sanders—"Bernie! Bernie!"—started barely seconds after O'Malley, who spoke third, walked off stage. And throughout the Vermont senator's speech, in addition to loud cheers, supporters were vocal: some shouted "Preach!" or "That's right!" after each point he made. "No president can bring about the changes that we need in this country unless there is a political revolution," Sanders said. He got perhaps his biggest applause line—from people across the room—when he called for the Supreme Court to overturn its now-infamous Citizens United decision. Clinton took aim at the Republican economic philosophy: "Trickle-down economics has to be one of the worst ideas of the 1980s. It is right up there with new Coke, shoulder pads and big hair," Clinton quipped. "I lived through it and there are photographs—and we are not going back to that." She went after Florida Gov. Jeb Bush by name, criticizing his remark that Americans want to work "longer hours." "In the past week, Gov. Bush scrambled to explain his statement that Americans need to work longer hours. He now says he just wants part-time workers to be able to find full-time jobs," she said. "Well, so do I. There's just one problem: his policies and the policies of all these Republican candidates would make that harder, giving more tax cuts to those at the top won't do anything for part-time workers." O'Malley lamented what he described as the decline of the Republican Party, including the rhetoric of business mogul Donald Trump. "They once had leaders and visionaries: Lincoln, Eisenhower," O'Malley said. "Now they create traffic jams and dismiss science." Of the other Democrats, O'Malley had a strong contingent of supporters in the room and got loud cheers and applause when he appeared on stage. His supporters—both the official campaign and the super PAC—cheered loudly, and for hours, outside the Cedar Rapids Convention Center before the event began. The lesser-known Democratic candidates, who did not have nearly as many supporters in the room, had a hard time getting traction with the crowd. Chafee, the former Rhode Island governor, spoke for just 6 minutes of his allotted 15. "I'm the only presidential candidate who has been a mayor, a U.S. senator and a governor," he said. "And throughout these experiences I have tried to earn a reputation for courage and honesty." And when Webb prepared to speak—he was fifth of the five candidates—some attendees began filing out of the room before he even made it on stage. "I'm going to turn the lights out tonight, folks," Webb joked. If there was conflict to be found Friday, it was on Twitter, where spokespersons for Clinton and O'Malley disputed whose candidate was first to support President Obama. Lis Smith, communications director for O'Malley's campaign, tweeted that O'Malley was the "first Dem tonight to give @BarackObama full-throated shout out." Nick Merrill, the traveling spokesman for Clinton's campaign, replied with a direct line from Clinton's speech: "With President Obama's leadership and the determination of the American people, we're standing again." Smith fired back by saying, "Oh sorry, I guess I fell asleep during that one." After Merrill replied again ("Be nicer."), Smith Tweeted that "it was—to its credit—a nice speech/" Minutes later, Smith was engaged in a war of Twitter words with Republican National Committee spokesman Sean Spicer. *The trap Hillary can’t escape: Her Bernie Sanders problem is she doesn’t understand Sanders’ policies are popular, mainstream and the future <http://www.salon.com/2015/07/19/the_trap_hillary_cant_escape_her_bernie_sanders_problem_is_she_doesnt_understand_sanders_policies_are_popular_mainstream_and_the_future/> // Salon // Bill Curry – July 19, 2015* There's a reason Clinton's economic plan sounds wooden and unspecific. She's misreading public mood and her party The Clinton Express wheezed its way into New York City this week, rolling into Greenwich Village to offload another “big speech,” this time on the economy. Whoever is driving this train must have considered Cooper Union as a possible station stop; a speech Lincoln gave there in 1860 may have made him president. But this speech wasn’t that big, not by a long shot. The campaign settled on a spot a few blocks away, a smallish auditorium over at The New School. Even that venue was a bit of a reach. The New School has a history of innovative economic inquiry dating to its 1919 founding by such progressive lights as John Dewey and Thorstein Veblen, neither of whom, it’s safe to say, would be backing Clinton today. When the school opened, the New York Times said its announced purpose was “to seek an unbiased understanding of the existing order, its genesis, growth and present working.” The country could use a fresh, unbiased analysis of the existing order. Clinton’s speech provided nothing of the sort. Still, it was well received in some quarters. At Vox, where much of what Clinton says is well received, Matthew Yglesias called her pledge to prosecute financial crimes “the most important words she has spoken thus far in the campaign.” It’s not saying much, as she hardly ever says anything substantive, let alone important. Yglesias likens her rhetoric to Elizabeth Warren’s, but why Warren when so many other politicians now promise the same thing? He notes Clinton’s “trust gap” with “activists focused on the issue” but says those activists can take “succor” knowing that bringing such cases is one of the few ways a “sharply constrained” President Clinton would have of “leaving a mark.” In other words, count on her doing it because she won’t be able to do much else. In a piece written before the event and based on campaign backgrounders, Yglesias claims the speech marks Clinton’s passage from neoliberalism to “paleoliberalism,” as in the Paleolithic Age of hunter gatherers. He says it “hints at a fundamental philosophical difference” Clinton now has with her husband, her old boss and her old self, and that it shows she is now “less inclined to favor a market-oriented approach than a left-wing approach” in which the financial sector is “deliberately regulated in a heavy handed way rather than allowed to lead the economy.” Yglesias says “left-wing interest group leaders” tell him they’re skeptical but he says “history suggests that presidents generally try to implement the agendas they have promised.” He also says Clinton was never “purely” a neoliberal—she backed a minimum wage hike and was willing to let government play a bigger role in health care—and that as president she’d extend financial regulation and help strengthen unions. He noted that Clinton would not be delivering a “laundry list” of specifics and that until she did no one could be quite sure what she was up to. The Times’ David Brooks also thinks Clinton is “best viewed… as a new paleoliberal.” To Brooks it denotes a faith that “government is more competent at steering companies toward their own best interests than are the companies themselves.” He says that many of her ideas have been proven wrong, that voters don’t share her fondness for central planning and that she has “no plausible chance” of getting her agenda through Congress. Still, he says, she “hasn’t gone crazy” or ruined herself by “wandering into the class warfare swamps.” He thus concludes that politically she has “cleared the first hurdle of this campaign” by offering “a coherent response to today’s economic conditions.” The Washington Post’s E.J. Dionne said “Clinton is making a major bid to shape the conversation” that “could mark the beginning of a genuinely substantive debate between Democrats and Republicans over how to define the nation’s economic problems.” He quoted a “campaign official” accusing Republicans of peddling “the same old proposals every Republican presidential candidate has been offering since Reagan”; unlike Clinton, whose package of new benefits includes “family leave, child care and more affordable access to college.” The official seemed not to know that, good as some of Clinton’s ideas may be, they are mostly the same ones Democratic candidates have been offering since Reagan. Yglesias, Brooks and Dionne are fine writers. But their somewhat overlapping analyses, like Clinton’s speech, perpetuate some habits we need to break. Clinton is no “paleoliberal,” a more than faintly pejorative label liberals would do well to challenge. She, Bill and Barack Obama practically invented neoliberalism and remain members in good standing until proven otherwise. If your speeches are long on weepy tales of “everyday Americans” you met on the campaign trail, but short on policy prescriptions, the credit goes to David Axelrod, not Paul Krugman. If you’d raise the minimum wage but won’t say how much, you’re Mitt Romney. If you back the Trans Pacific Trade Partnership–and despite recent evasions she’s all for it–you’re fighting for capital, not labor. I.F. Stone once counseled young reporters not to develop inside sources. He said reporters do more for sources than sources do for them, and that anyway most of what we need to know lies right under our nose, hidden like Poe’s purloined letter in a speech or a public record. It’s sound advice, but especially if you’re covering the Clinton campaign. Background interviews with insiders are catnip for reporters, few of whom would miss a chance to get out ahead of the pack. But if they’d wait for the transcript they might reap the full rewards of textural criticism. To wit: Yglesias’ notion that presidents try to deliver on campaign promises may be right, notwithstanding Obama’s spotty record. (See ethics reform, whistleblowers, the surveillance state, the public option, the minimum wage, etc.) But if you parse Hillary’s speech you find that despite talking for 55 minutes she didn’t make any promises, or at least none specific enough to be politically actionable. Her handlers did a fine job of prepping the press for yet another dearth of detail. But at this point “instructions to follow” isn’t a viable message for Clinton, nor should any reporter react to such assurances from any politician with anything but a long, loud groan. Clinton’s speech didn’t spark a “substantive debate between Democrats and Republicans.” If you’ve so much as glanced at the GOP field, you know they won’t be having one this year. Nor did it move the needle on the Democrats’ debate, which moves away from Clinton even as she runs to chase it down. It’s true for reporters and campaigns alike: If you focus too much on tactics, you miss the meaning of the race. What drives this race is not what the left wants; it’s what middle-class families want. Their economic anxiety and outrage at the condition of our democracy is transforming politics in ways Obama never imagined. It’s this mood that David Brooks mistakes for the “class warfare swamps.” Voters prize civility and long for a populism without culprits or conspiracies–but sorely want to hear their righteous anger expressed. Clinton won’t do it, in part because she can’t offend the delicate sensibilities of her donors but also because, like Brooks, she mistakes the mood for a leftist insurrection. Many of us–see Paul Rosenberg’s wonderful article right here in Salon–have long argued that the old categories are defunct and that much of what the old order calls radical has long since gone mainstream. Soon everyone will see it. For now, let me suggest a rule: any policy enjoying majority support in every poll must henceforth be called centrist, not “radical” or “left wing.” If you aren’t sure, look it up. Clinton’s speech was on balance another disappointment, but it must be said she packed it with more proposals than any candidate not named Bernie Sanders has offered all year. Her delivery remains a problem. She’s improved, but can’t shake that sing-songy cadence that makes her sound like Al Gore hosting a children’s television show. Aides say she must seem more authentic, but it can’t help that her policies are so vague or that her anecdotes seem so canned. Her full embrace of Axelrod’s politics of biography isn’t helping either. Telling so many personal stories, she gives off more than a whiff of self-involvement. On Monday she recalled a nurse in the hospital where her granddaughter was born thanking her for “fighting for paid leave.” She’d be better served by a story in which she thanks the nurse. What she mainly needs is to tell fewer such stories. Clinton’s style is problematic but her real problem is policy. Her speech embodied the neoliberal struggle to adapt to changing times and especially to changing public opinion. The early tenets of neoliberalism were economic deregulation, fiscal austerity, modulated militarism, a faint environmentalism and a cultish faith in the potential for technology, economic growth and global trade to solve our problems. The deregulation boom fizzled out in 2008; Republicans don’t even talk much about it in public except in the most abstract terms. Many neoliberals remain deficit hawks, as do most voters, but the Tea Party has tired everyone on the topic. Clinton learned in 2008 that her less-modulated militarism is a nonstarter with the Democratic base. Its stock has since fallen with the general public. The Iraq War and our bloated military budget belong at the heart of any discussion of what sank our economy in the 2000s and what we must do now to fix it, but don’t wait for Clinton to make the case. Neoliberals would extend the social contract but not in a slow economy, which nowadays means not at all. It’s why Clinton, who does want to extend it, mostly namechecks cherished goals– universal pre-K, paid leave, lifelong learning–while steering clear of the fiscal weeds. A surprising amount of her economic agenda involved social services and educational opportunity and she was at her best making the case for their importance to the overall economy. Clinton structured her speech as a plan for three types of growth: strong growth, fair growth and long-term growth. Strong growth got the lead mention, though unlike Jeb Bush she got no more specific than “getting close to full employment is crucial for raising incomes.” It speaks volumes of all our fears for the future when the leading Democratic candidate for president lowers her sights to “getting closer to full employment” and no one even seems to notice. Clinton revisited lots of familiar proposals, from immigration reform to enacting the Buffett Rule to investing in infrastructure, so many that such shape and purpose as the speech might once have had was lost. Its one intriguing passage pertained to a promise to promote profit sharing. By the standards of modern politics it was long, a whole paragraph, which suggests Clinton or her people are at least giving some thought to issues of economic structure, though what she offered up was the merest morsel of an idea that is in itself timid. Clinton’s speech had its isolated moments but if it sparks a debate it won’t be because she made common cause with a category of unicorns called paleoliberals, but because Bernie Sanders seizes the chance it presents. Clinton still doesn’t get it. It is the neoliberals who are paleo now. The ferment Sanders has tapped into is the future. But to get there coalitions must be broadened and policies rethought; when the old order collapses you don’t seek the old center, you invent a new one. In taking on Hillary, Sanders must not only propose policies, he must expose the false logic of the status quo. Some issues will be easier than others. Sanders is plainspoken about the radical environmental changes we must make to secure our prosperity and avoid an existential catastrophe. The transition to a sustainable economy based on conservation and clean, renewable energy is our most urgent economic task. Yet of the 5,113 words in Clinton’s speech, exactly 60 were on energy and the environment. You can’t run as a Democrat and name-check climate change. Clinton’s a fine debater, but on this topic she’s easy pickings. In her speech, Clinton didn’t abandon any neoliberal doctrine but she whistled past them all, even the core neoliberal faith in growth, technology and trade. Sanders has the skills to dissect these issues in ways we can grasp. Someone has to. Rising tides no longer lift most boats, let alone all. Even if things go well, we aren’t apt to see the wage growth we once knew. Yet we could create even more disposable income by lowering the costs of basic necessities for average families. It will take big reductions in the costs of health care, education, energy, consumer credit, transportation–and yes, even taxes. We can do it, but only by reining in powerful institutions that now use the political system to mortgage us to the past. Sanders has long recognized that “fair growth” demands not just a little profit sharing but economic democratization through employee ownership, consumer and producer cooperatives, cooperative banks and a host of other new and old economic forms that struggle to survive under present rules. Clinton says she wants to be the “small-business president.” I think she means it, but I don’t think she knows what it means. Again, Sanders is miles ahead of her. In the ’90s you couldn’t tell Bill Clinton from Newt Gingrich on the topic of new technology. There’s no shame in that. Everybody was a believer then. Not long ago you could be laughed out of politics for saying this technological wave might be the one that finally costs more jobs than it creates. But 20 years into the Age of Information, jobs are in short supply. As we restructure employment and all the many ways in which we provide for one another’s needs, we are less tolerant of technology’s intrusions on our privacy and personhood. The issue of the day is “trade.” I’m amazed when economists invoke the theories of David Ricardo as if nothing’s changed in the 200 years since his passing. Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage asserted that free trade always results in a net benefit to the trading partners since each sells goods on which it enjoys a natural advantage: climate, raw materials, labor supply, etc. But when jobs cross borders in nanoseconds the advantages everyone seeks are low wages and weak governments. Somebody must tell the neoliberals this is no longer about who has the best weather to grow bananas in. In fact, it is no longer about trade. It is about whether democracy rules commerce–or commerce rules democracy. It’s a subject Sanders knows well. Clinton appears clueless. This is the debate we need: how best to turn back the impersonal tide of globalization and begin conscious creation of a new, intentional economy. This isn’t the debate Clinton or the media is prepared to have. But it’s the one the country urgently desires, and one progressives can win. Like the polls, the throngs flowing to Sanders’ events and the small-dollar donations to his campaign attest to the ripeness of the moment. The real proof’s in the power of ideas. *National Security Expert Slams Hillary’s ‘Assault’ On Free Speech <http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/18/national-security-expert-slams-hillarys-assault-on-free-speech/> // The Daily Caller // Rachel Stoltzfoos – July 18, 2015 * Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton put her willingness to defend the Constitution in serious doubt when she promised Islamic countries the United States government would intimidate Americans who violate their free speech code, national security expert Stephen Coughlin told The Daily Caller News Foundation. As Secretary of State, Clinton promised an international Islamic organization in 2011 that the United States government would “use some old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming” to intimidate Americans who improperly criticize Islam or Muhammad. “An official of the United States, in an official communiqué, went to a foreign land to commit to a foreign leader that the United States Government would engage in the extra-legal practice of intimidating American citizens in the exercise of what is otherwise their protected free speech rights under the First Amendment,” Coughlin told TheDCNF. Coughlin discusses the move in his recently published book, “Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad,” and told TheDCNF it casts a pall on her record as secretary of state. “If her willingness to sell out Americans First Amendment rights to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation by categorizing as ‘hate speech’ anything that is deemed offensive to Islam is any indication, she may be the least qualified candidate to support and defend the Constitution,” he said. Coughlin’s an attorney, decorated intelligence officer and expert on Islamic law and terrorism who consulted the military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff for about a decade following 9/11, before the Muslim Brotherhood allegedly convinced the White House to ban him and “outlaw” his briefings. He cites Clinton’s 2011 visit to Turkey and her cooperation with the OIC in his book as one example of how muslim ideologists wield influence in the “highest reaches” of the U.S. government. The Clinton campaign did not respond to requests for comment. The OIC is the second-largest intergovernmental organization after the U.N., consisting of 57 states that identify as “the collective voice of the Muslim world.” After she helped the OIC secure passage of U.N. resolution 16/18, “Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against persons based on religion or belief,” Clinton promised the U.S. would take what steps it could to curb speech critical of Islam. “And together we have begun to overcome the false divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression, and we are pursuing a new approach based on concrete steps to fight intolerance wherever it occurs,” she said in an address following the resolution’s passage. “We also understand that, for 235 years, freedom of expression has been a universal right at the core of our democracy,” she added. “So we are focused on promoting interfaith education and collaboration, enforcing antidiscrimination laws, protecting the rights of all people to worship as they choose, and to use some old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel they have the support to do what we abhor.” The resolution condemns “any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audio-visual or electronic media.” Coughlin argues in his book it’s part of a deliberate OIC-led effort to bring the U.S. and other countries in line with Muslim speech standards, first by condemning and eventually criminalizing unwanted speech such as depictions of Muhammad. “Over the last few years, major left wing and Islamists organizations have been working diligently to reframe free speech in an oppositional narrative that distinguishes sanctioned speech, designated free speech, from hate speech in a long term campaign to brand nonconforming speech as hate speech that is at first to be ridiculed and then criminalized,” he told TheDCNF. *Hillary Clinton defends Iran pact during Davenport, Iowa, campaign stop <http://siouxcityjournal.com/hillary-clinton-defends-iran-pact-during-davenport-iowa-campaign-stop/article_ea402f1f-8b7e-57fb-8809-aeccfe57f63c.html> // Sioux City Journal // Ed Tibbetts – July 18, 2015 * Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton defended the nuclear agreement reached with Iran at a campaign stop in Davenport on Saturday, saying, “What we were doing before President Obama became president and I became secretary of state wasn’t working.” The deal announced earlier in the week between Iran and a coalition of six countries, led by the United States, has been greeted with near unanimous scorn from Republicans in Congress and those who are running for president. But in a visit to Davenport on Saturday, the former secretary of state said Iran had made advances in its nuclear program during the Bush administration and left the Obama team with a problem. "When we came into office, that train had left the station,” Clinton said. "Our challenge was, what were we going to do to back it up. And I think, given the circumstances, this agreement holds promise for stalling, preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and we have got to enforce it.” Republicans have been trying to tie the agreement to Clinton almost as much as they do to Obama. And critics have complained that the inspections parts of the pact are weak. Clinton, though, said that if she is elected, enforcement would receive constant attention from her. “I will just be on that day in and day out to make sure we catch them if they try to cheat,” she said. Clinton spoke for about a half-hour at the home of Ken Croken, an executive at Genesis Health System. She covered a wide range of subjects over a half-hour, then met with the approximately 60 people who attended. Reporters and photographers were ushered out of the house after her remarks. Clinton got a big cheer when she defended Obama’s handling of the economy. She also praised the Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage decision and spoke of the need to push for early education. She also, for the second consecutive day, criticized Gov. Terry Branstad for recent mental health and education spending vetoes. Clinton made the stop in Davenport on the heels of a big fundraiser for the state Democratic Party on Friday night in Cedar Rapids, where all the major contenders for the party’s 2016 presidential nomination appeared. Clinton has a wide lead in the polls, both nationally and in Iowa. But Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont has gained some ground in recent weeks. And the progressive wing of the party is pushing Clinton to take a harder line on Wall Street, among other things. Nonetheless, some of those who attended Saturday, a number of whom were already Clinton supporters, said that she struck the right balance for them. And they said her years of experience appealed to them. “I think she knows what you have to do to get things done,” Margie Schwaninger, a retired teacher from Bettendorf, said. Schwaninger said she supported Clinton eight years ago. Sheri Carnahan, of Davenport, who also supported Clinton in 2008, echoed other supporters who say that in her years working in politics, Clinton has worked to advance progressive priorities. “The issues that are important to me are the issues that she’s fought for long before she ran for president of the United States,” Carnahan said. Clinton was headed to Arkansas on Saturday night for a party fundraising dinner there. But before she left she stopped to greet some people in the McClellan Heights neighborhood for a short time, posing for a picture with a Galesburg couple and their 10-month-old son who had been having lunch in the area and then went for a walk. *Clinton remembers D'Army Bailey at funeral <http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/local-news/bailey_funeral_11176995> // Commercial Appeal // Thomas Bailey – July 18, 2015 * Former President Bill Clinton on Saturday eulogized Judge D’Army Bailey as a mover and “movement politician.’’ “He was always moving us,’’ the 42nd president told a large crowd of mourners during a two hour and 20 minute funeral at Mississippi Boulevard Christian Church. The Circuit Court judge, lifelong civil rights activist, author and even part-time actor died July 12 of cancer at age 73. Judge Bailey’s civil rights activism, Clinton acknowledged with a smile, had “moved’’ Southern University to expel him and “moved’’ citizens of Berkeley, California, to remove him from their City Council in 1973. “But that was part of who he was,” Clinton said in his 17-minute eulogy. “Here’s the first thing I want to say to the young people: You need to be moving.’’ That same compulsion to act led Judge Bailey, Clinton said, to save the Lorraine Motel. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated there in 1968. Judge Bailey and the late A.W. Willis raised $144,000 to buy the bankrupt motel, and continued working until the motel opened in 1991 as the National Civil Rights Museum. About 250,000 people visited the museum on Mulberry over the past year. “The Lorraine Motel could be a parking lot, for all you know, today if it hadn’t been for D’Army Bailey,” said Clinton, who reminded the mourners that he attended the museum’s dedication as governor of Arkansas. “ ... He left a monument that will have to be moved, not physically but internally,’’ he said. “You can’t imagine if you are not of a certain age what the civil rights museum means to those of us who were young when Martin Luther King was killed in Memphis.’’ Before the black-garbed church choir started the service with soothing strains, Judge Bailey’s body lay at the front in an open, wood casket. Floral displays flanked the casket, which, when closed, was draped in a U.S. flag. Judge Bailey’s colleagues in the judiciary — about 40 strong — sat as a group at the front behind U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen and Memphis Mayor A C Wharton. Wharton was one of six people who gave short eulogies before the former president took the pulpit. The others were U.S. Dist. Judge Bernice Donald, attorney Richard Glassman, family friend Aubrey Howard, Circuit Court Judge Jerry Stokes and Bailey’s brother, Shelby County Commissioner Walter Bailey. Wharton smiled as he described Judge Bailey as “the most sophisticated, cosmopolitan radical that most of us would ever meet.’’ Wharton drew laughter when he said, “Who but D’Army Bailey could pull off ‘speaking truth to power’ while remaining one of the individuals in power? But, hey, that was D’Army Bailey.’’ A city mayor receives lots of advice, Wharton told the mourners. Judge Bailey never sugarcoated his, Wharton said, again with a smile. “You got it pure and unadulterated. And the hard part about it was that it was always true.’’ Glassman recalled being both a courtroom adversary and close friend to Judge Bailey over the years. Bailey had a passion for Justice, he said, adding, “D’Army showed those around him how to turn passion into action through his own example. “He always emphasized the importance of the law and the right of all persons coming into his courtroom — young, black, experienced, not experienced — he treated all parties fairly and equally,’’ Glassman said. Donald said one of the highlights of her life was when Judge Bailey asked her to administer to him the oath of office when he took the bench. She described Judge Bailey as a bridge builder. “We in this community, in this state and nation are a better people because D’Army Bailey lived,’’ she said. Stokes, the Division 6 Circuit Court judge, described another way that Judge Bailey was a mover: He kept cases in his courtroom moving along. Judge Bailey was loathe to grant attorneys’ requests for continuances — or delays — in his courtroom, Stokes said. “You had to fish or cut bait,” Stokes said. “He would not tolerate delays.’’ Walter Bailey brought applause when he told the mourners, “D’Army did everything in his mortal power to make this a better world for all of us.’’ Clinton received a rousing ovation before and after his eulogy. “This man was moving all his life,” the former president said. “We’re a long way from where we used to be. And he had a lot of fun doing it. “All those movie roles he had (Judge Bailey acted in several movies including “The People vs. Larry Flynt”); I wish we had a movie of the founding of the civil rights museum and he could close out his career as a lead actor playing the starring role,’’ he said. “ ... He left you and America a national treasure. He left his wife and children and brother and the family he loved so much a loving legacy. “You have to decide what to do with it,’’ Clinton said. “He moved to the very end. To the very end he moved. May God rest his soul. He earned it.’’ *OTHER DEMOCRATS NATIONAL COVERAGE* *DECLARED* *SANDERS* *Sanders vaults from fringe to the heart of the fray <https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2015/07/18/summer-sanders-fall-sanders/FWFu6n73iroD98e4og2baM/story.html> // The Boston Globe // Annie Linksey – July 18, 2015 * It’s 7:20 a.m. and Bernie Sanders looks irritated. He’s already buckled into his economy seat on Delta Flight 4516 and an attendant just announced that the flight would sit on the runway for 30 minutes before taking off. “Planes,” grumbled the Vermont senator. “Don’t get me started about airplanes.” Then he added, in a tone that sounded only half-joking, “This is when you want a private jet.” Sanders’ insurgent campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination doesn’t spring for charters like his top competitor — at least not yet. On this day he isn’t even flying nonstop, as he heads from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, to Phoenix via Minneapolis. If all goes well, he’ll just be a few minutes late to a forum at Netroots Nation, an annual gathering of liberals. The weekend events — another rally is planned in Houston Sunday — is capping off Sanders’ best week so far in his increasingly credible quest for the nomination. Federal reports made public last week show he has raised more than $15 million for his campaign, beating every other presidential candidate from either party save Hillary Rodham Clinton (she hauled in about $46 million). He has gathered the money from an army of small donors that is larger than that of any other presidential candidate. And, as he pulled his roller bag out of the air-conditioned terminal into the blast of Phoenix heat Saturday morning, he was preparing to speak that evening before his largest crowd yet. Through some combination of political skill, fortuitous timing, well-tuned messaging, and sheer luck this has become the Summer of Sanders — in which an unkempt 73-year old man who isn’t even a member of the Democratic Party is mounting the strongest challenge to the Democratic establishment. He’s gone from being dismissed as a fringe candidate to having a huge early impact on the primary. The self-described Democratic socialist flying coach is suddenly a star. Clinton aides have acknowledged concern about losing ground in Iowa and New Hampshire, or both, to Sanders. One poll has shown him within 19 percentage points of Clinton in the Hawkeye State and another has him within eight points of her in New Hampshire. ‘This country belongs to all of us and not a handful of billionaires.’ But, will it last? Or, as one of his strategists put it, could the next few months bring the fall of Sanders? Already the Sanders campaign infrastructure is creaking under the weight of the unexpected interest in his candidacy. Tens of thousands of bumper stickers were on back order. Venues for rallies need to be changed multiple times as the RSVPs pile high, and crowds swell. And most importantly, to survive, he’ll need to expand his support beyond the liberal wing of the Democratic Party — and persuade the party that he should be the standard bearer. Sanders contends that the national caricature of him as a hippy-dippy socialist from the People’s Republic of Burlington, where he was mayor from 1981 to 1989, is largely inaccurate. He jokes about it — saying that he doesn’t own a pair of Birkenstocks and never would “in a million years.” He says that his message resonates most loudly with blue-collar workers, not the tie-dye set. On Friday night in a vast hall in Cedar Rapids before 1,300 people, that appeal was on full display. Sanders shared the stage for the first time with the other four Democratic candidates who took turns speaking to the audience. He won multiple standing ovations for a thundering rant against the inordinate power of the super-rich. He called for a “political revolution” and predicted that without it, the country was heading toward an oligarchy. “Nothing will get done unless millions of people stand up and roundly proclaim enough is enough,” Sanders said, gripping the lectern with both hands. “This country belongs to all of us, and not a handful of billionaires.” It was a classic display of Sanders’ freewheeling approach, the aura of blunt authenticity that makes him seem a refreshing change from Clinton’s poll-tested messages and reluctance to offer detailed positions on issues of the day. “He really connected,” said Steve Hultman, a 65-year-old retired teacher from Council Bluffs, Iowa. “Hillary has to go to work. She has to get the facts and framing to excite the Democratic side of the party.” Some part of Sanders’ popularity flows directly from the Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party. He only began to rise in polls of probable voters when the Massachusetts senator’s name was dropped from their surveys after it became clear that she wouldn’t run. For him as for her, not having to worry much about moderate support is liberating; Clinton has no such luxury. And it doesn’t really tell against Sanders at this early stage that a liberal message like his may not play well, or at all, in some states a candidate must win to gain nomination or election. But there’s more to Sanders than the Warren echo. Unlike others in the current field, he has been quietly building a national grass-roots network for years. His 2012 Senate campaign finance report looks remarkably similar to his presidential one last week, with most contributions coming from small donors across the country. He raised $7.2 million for that election, swamping his Republican opponent, who took in about $135,000. While he was being written off in 2014 by the news media and other candidates focused on Warren instead, Sanders road-tested his message. In Los Angeles, he recalled, there were standing-room-only crowds this year well before announcing his candidacy. In Texas, so many people came to hear him that a traffic jam of supporters headed for the venue made it difficult for him to get to the event himself. Still, those around Sanders weren’t sure he was going to run even weeks before his April 30 announcement. “As late as late April, if Bernie had called and said ‘we’re not doing this’ I would not have been shocked,” said Tad Devine, a longtime Sanders ally and a political consultant. There’s a limit to the revolution Sanders is pushing: The senator won’t mount an independent bid for president. No matter how the crowds swell. “We’re doing this within the party system,” he said again Saturday on the Minneapolis leg of his trip. Keeping it simple Sanders’ plane landed in Minneapolis with about 30 minutes to get his connecting flight. One passenger positioned himself near the end of the jet bridge to get a photo of him getting off the plane. He paused for selfies with several others as they all waited for luggage checked at the gate. Lisa Fontana took a selfie with Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders at a Democratic Party event in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Unlike Clinton’s container-ship-sized campaign organization with more than 300 on staff, Sanders has a much smaller operation. On Saturday he traveled with only his campaign manager, his communications director, a videographer, and his wife. He figured out most of the logistics himself — securing boarding passes for the group and leading everyone through the Minneapolis airport from one terminal to the other. The campaign pays 25 full-time staff members in Iowa and rents offices in 10 different towns. Sanders has just 10 full-time staffers in Vermont, 5 in Washington, and 4 in New Hampshire, plus 11 paid interns in Vermont and New Hampshire. He revels in this relative lack of professional help. To make his point, he briefly commandeered an interview with a reporter last week in Washington. “Ask me who my campaign finance director is,” he said over coffee in a Senate cafeteria. “We don’t have one. Ask me who my pollster is,” he said. “We don’t have one.” He said he writes his own direct mail. That’s not to say Sanders has a consultant-free campaign. He’s soaked up some talent from President Obama’s team. The names include Scott Goodstein, an online director for Obama’s first presidential race, and Arun Chaudhary, another veteran of the 2008 Obama campaign team who was Obama’s first videographer. Teamwork pays off Should this team’s work pay off and Sanders becomes even more viable, the target on his candidacy will grow. On June 25 a super PAC linked to former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley, another declared Democratic candidate, spent about $10,000 on online ads critical of Sanders’ record on gun control, which is, for a Democrat, notably friendly to gun owners. Sanders’ team fought back, using the same rhetoric that Warren so effectively employs against her many critics: Frame the attack as an assault on the progressive movement and raise buckets of cash off of it. The day after the ads began, Sanders’ campaign blasted an e-mail to supporters requesting help. Within 48 hours they’d raised more than $800,000, according to a source familiar with his fund-raising. But by far the most talked about aspect of Sanders’ candidacy is the size of the crowds — it comes as a shock even to the candidate. “You walk into an arena and find 10,000 people looking at you . . . ” he said in an interview, trailing off. Then he turned to Michael Briggs, his charmingly beleaguered press aide. “How many RSVPs do we have now in Phoenix?” he asked. “10,000?” The swell forced the campaign to move the event twice. The same thing happened in Portland, Maine, where he ended up speaking to more than 7,500. And in Madison, Wis., where he spoke to a crowd about 10,000. And in Denver, where he spoke to about 5,000. Putting this many supporters in a room takes work. The campaign e-mails supporters who live near events, and they ask an enthusiastic Reddit community to spread the word. There’s a practical reason for holding these events. Sanders hasn’t spent much time building the relationships within the Democratic Party leaders at the state level that can help propel a national candidacy. “We need to build organization, particularly in relatively early states,” Devine said. On Saturday — when Sanders finally arrived at Netroots — the work that he needs to do to appeal to the broader Democratic coalition was clear. A group of mostly African-American demonstrators protesting police brutality had heckled O’Malley, disrupting his speech. Sanders knew he was walking into a difficult situation. “It’s this afternoon’s talk I’m worried about,” he said before walking on the stage — and faced some of the same angry chants, competing with the cheers. *UNDECLARED* *BIDEN* *Sources: Joe Biden Still Considering A Presidential Campaign <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/joe-biden-presidential-campaign_55a9583fe4b0d2ded39ef720> // HuffPo // Ryan Grim – July 18, 2015 * Vice President Joe Biden is still very much considering a bid for the White House, people close to Biden say, and will make a final decision at the end of the summer, targeted for September. The Iowa caucuses are scheduled for early February, meaning Biden would have roughly four months to barnstorm the first-in-the-nation state before the contest turned to New Hampshire. Front-runner Hillary Clinton has faced a surprisingly tough challenge from democratic socialist Bernie Sanders, who is within striking distance in Iowa despite not being registered as a Democrat and trailing far behind in establishment support. Sanders' surge suggests Clinton could be once again beatable in a Democratic primary. While Biden is seriously considering the bid, he has by no means decided to pull the trigger. "He has said he would announce his decision at the end of the summer," said Ted Kaufman, a former Democratic senator from Delaware and longtime aide to Biden, when asked about Biden's plans. Kaufman recently went back to work for the vice president in the months preceding Beau Biden’s death so that he could help his old boss and friend through the unspeakably difficult time. The vice president’s press secretary, Kendra A. Barkoff, denounced the speculation, but kept the door ajar. "The Biden family is going through a difficult time right now,” said Barkoff. “Any speculation about the views of the vice president or his family about his political future is premature and inappropriate." The Wall Street Journal reported last month that Biden’s late son, Beau Biden, who the vice president has called "my soul," had urged him to run for president before he died. His son Hunter has also encouraged him to enter the race. Though he is undeclared, Biden is polling at slightly above 10 percent nationally, trailing both Sanders and Clinton. *Biden still considering 2016 bid: report <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/dem-primaries/248428-biden-still-considering-2016-bid-report> // The Hill // Keith Laing – July 18, 2015 * Vice President Joe Biden is still mulling a challenge to Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, the Huffington Post reported. Clinton is the dominant frontrunner for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama, but Biden expects to make a decision on entering the race by September, according to the report. "He has said he would announce his decision at the end of the summer," former Biden aide and Sen. Ted Kaufman (D-Del.), said when he asked about the vice president's 2016 plans, according to the website. Clinton has widely been seen as the likely 2016 Democratic nominee, even before she launched her presidential bid in April. But she has faced a surprising challenge from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has drawn large crowds and quickly risen in polls. Clinton campaign officials have insisted that they are not worried about Sanders or any of the other Democratic candidates in the presidential race, including former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, former Sen. Jim Webb and former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee. Biden, who has run for the presidency twice before in 1988 and 2008, would be considered a longshot if he launches a bid. A spokesperson for Biden dismissed the presidential speculation in the report. "The Biden family is going through a difficult time right now,” Vice Presidential Press Secretary Kendra Barkoff told the website, referencing the death of Biden's son, Beau, who had been Delaware's attorney general. “Any speculation about the views of the vice president or his family about his political future is premature and inappropriate," Barkoff continued. Biden has traveled extensively since the 2014 election to early-voting states in the 2016 primaries like Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. *OTHER* *Activists disrupt forum featuring candidates O’Malley, Sanders <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/activists-disrupt-forum-featuring-candidates-omalley-sanders/2015/07/18/ca64eb34-2d60-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html> // WaPo // John Wagner – July 18, 2015 * A forum featuring two of the most liberal candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination was disrupted and taken over Saturday by liberal activists seeking to showcase their concerns for the plight of African Americans. Former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) made back-to-back appearances in a presidential town hall that was part of the four-day Netroots Nation conference here, an annual gathering of 3,000 progressive activists that Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton elected to skip. Shortly into O’Malley’s allotted time, his discussion with a moderator was disrupted by more than 100 protesters that included members of Black Lives Matter, a group formed after teenager Trayvon Martin’s shooting in Florida, and the Black Alliance for Just Immigration. As chanting protesters streamed to the front of the room, O’Malley looked stunned at first and then started clapping along. Close to 10 minutes later, leaders of the protest were handed microphones and rattled off a number of their concerns, including deaths of African Americans in police custody, and demanded specific solutions from O’Malley. “It’s not like we like shutting s--- down, but we have to,” Patrisse Cullors, co-founder of Black Lives Matters, told the crowd, saying the group’s issues were an emergency. The protest, however, did not appear aimed at O’Malley. The protesters remained as Sanders appeared on stage, and he took a less patient approach. “Whoa, whoa, let me talk about what I came to talk about for a minute,” the senator said before launching into a riff on income inequality and steps to address it. The Vermont senator faced chants and heckling as well, but Sanders continued talking. Asked what he had done in the Senate to benefit black Americans, he started to talk about the 2010 Affordable Care Act. “We can’t afford that!” heckled Elle Hearns, a 28-year-old Ohio-based coordinator for the LGBT rights group GetEqual. O’Malley made several starts at addressing the issues raised but was interrupted. Democratic presidential candidate and former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley speaks to guests at the Iowa Democratic Party’s Hall of Fame Dinner on Friday. “I think that all of us as Americans have a responsibility to recognize the pain and grief throughout our country from all of the lives that have been lost to violence, whether that’s violence at the hands of police, whether that’s violence at the hands of civilians,” he said. “Stop trying to generalize this s---!” yelled Ashley Yates, a 30-year-old activist from Oakland, Calif. Later, O’Malley drew boos as he said: “Black lives matter. White lives matter. All lives matter.” After his appearance, O’Malley addressed those comments on a radio show being recorded at the convention hall. “When I said those other two phrases, I meant no disrespect,” O’Malley told the online radio show “This Week in Blackness.” “I did not mean to be insensitive in any way.” As Baltimore’s mayor, O’Malley faced criticism of the city’s aggressive policing policies, a topic that moderator Jose Antonio Vargas questioned him about at the outset of the forum. (Vargas, a journalist, filmmaker and activist who is an immigrant in the country illegally, previously worked as a reporter for The Washington Post.) Sanders made several comments addressing the protesters’ concerns, including: “In my view, maybe, just maybe, it’s time to invest in jobs and education, not in jails and in incarceration.” That generated applause from a crowd where hundreds carried Sanders’s campaign signs. Vargas decided to cut the forum about 15 minutes short of its allotted time. “Unfortunately, we have to wrap it up,” he said. “Okay, good,” Sanders replied, before rising to exit. Following the event, Mary Rickles, a spokeswoman for Netroots Nation, said: “We wish the candidates had more time to respond to the issues. What happened today is reflective of an urgent moment that America is facing today.” The crowd was largely sympathetic to the protesters, but many said afterward that they wish they could have heard more from the candidates. “I didn’t disagree with the message,” said Elizabeth Arledge, 50, of Alexandria, Va., an activist who focuses on civil justice. “I was very supportive of it, and I also wanted the program to go on.” Lucas Hernon, 30, of Las Cruces, N.M., an undecided voter, said he thought O’Malley handled the situation well except for when he said white lives also matter. “As a white person, we don’t need to be reminded of that,” Hernon said. Some in the audience suggested there could be fallout from the event for Sanders, whose challenges include expanding his appeal beyond liberal white voters. Bethany Winkels, a 30-year-old activist from Minneapolis, said it was hypocritical for Sanders to call for more grass-roots organizing in one breath and then sound dismissive of the protesters in the next. “It’s shameful, and he needs to do better,” Winkels said. *Demonstrators disrupt presidential forum at Netroots event <http://bigstory.ap.org/article/bc3ccd7839a1420f9c20a25ee81077df/omalley-faces-demonstrators-liberal-netroots-convention> // AP // Ken Thomas – July 18, 2015 * Demonstrators protesting cases of police brutality and the treatment of black Americans by law enforcement disrupted a presidential forum on Saturday as Democratic candidate Martin O'Malley was interviewed on stage. The group later heckled Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. In a raucous scene at the annual Netroots Nation convention, a large group of protesters streamed into the convention hall chanting, "Black lives matter!" as O'Malley was interviewed by Jose Antonio Vargas. One of the group's leaders took over the stage and addressed the audience as the largely female group of demonstrators railed against police-involved shootings, the treatment of immigrants and Arizona's racial history. The demonstrators were promoting the national "Black Lives Matter" movement, which seeks changes to law enforcement policies following several high profile deaths of black men at the hands of police. Sanders and O'Malley are vying to become the Democratic alternative to front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was campaigning in Iowa and Arkansas on Saturday and did not attend Netroots. Before the demonstrations, Vargas pressed O'Malley to defend his law enforcement record as Baltimore's mayor a decade ago. O'Malley faced scrutiny when unrest broke out in his home city after an African-American man, Freddie Gray, died while in police custody in April. O'Malley discussed his work to deal with violence and drug addiction in Baltimore, telling the crowd, "there are very few issues in our country that are quite as painfully intertwined as the legacy of violence, race and law enforcement in America." He said his policies improved policing, reduced the number of police-involved shootings and increased drug treatment. About 20 minutes into the interview, demonstrators walked into the cavernous ballroom, creating a confusing scene. Tia Oso, National Coordinator for the Black Alliance for Just Immigration in Phoenix, took the stage and addressed the crowd, noting two years had passed since the the Black Lives Matter movement started after Michael Brown, an unarmed black 18-year-old was fatally shot by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. Days of protests that sometimes turned violent in the St. Louis suburb followed. "We want to take a moment at Netroots to acknowledge the lives lost," Oso said. Organizers sought to restore order and at one point, Cheryl Contee, a Netroots Nation board member, took the stage and asked the audience to allow O'Malley to respond. O'Malley said all Americans have a responsibility to "recognize the pain and the grief throughout our country, through all the lives that have been lost to violence." He reiterated that every police department should be required to report all police-involved shootings and create civilian review boards. "Black lives matter. White lives matter. All lives matter," O'Malley told the crowd, as some protesters heckled him. O'Malley later said after a roundtable event on immigration that he regretted the comments. "I meant no insensitivity by that and I apologize if that's what I communicated. That was misstated. What I intended to say was that we're all in this together — that black lives do matter and we have a double-standard of justice in this country." Sanders, during his abbreviated 20 minute appearance, spoke about the need to address wealth and income inequality, noting that blacks and Hispanics face high rates of unemployment. His remarks were interrupted at times by the protesters, prompting Sanders to respond, "Black lives of course matter. I spent 50 years of my life fighting for civil rights." Sanders called the criminal justice system "out of control" and described high rates of unemployment and incarceration for young black Americans. The Netroots Nation convention has been a rough place for presidential candidates before. Clinton last appeared in 2007, when it was called the Yearly Kos, and heard boos from some activists who disapproved of her vote for the 2003 invasion of Iraq and her acceptance of campaign contributions from lobbyists. *Iowa Democratic Party dinner: 5 takeaways <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/iowa-democratic-party-dinner-hillary-clinton-120315.html> // Politico // Gabriel Debenedetti – July 18, 2015 * If Hillary Clinton is worried about liberal challenger Bernie Sanders, she didn’t let it show here on Friday night at the party’s first cattle call event, which saw Democrats’ quintet of presidential candidates finally descend on the same place at the same time. As expected, at the Iowa Democratic Party’s Hall of Fame Dinner all eyes were on Clinton and Sanders, who sat just feet away from each other. The cavernous ballroom of roughly 1,300 Iowan activists ate up the strain between the party’s leading candidates, while laying bare some of their most glaring weaknesses. The crowd was largely made up of party establishment figures sympathetic to Clinton, but it also comprised a healthy pro-Bernie faction, creating a night of tension for two candidates who insisted on talking past one another, neither fully acknowledging the former secretary of state’s status as a dominating front-runner who remains dogged by Sanders’ fiery, insurgent, and grumpy candidacy. Meanwhile the audience barely registered the presence of Lincoln Chafee or Jim Webb. But there were signs of a small opening for Martin O’Malley, whose speech was received favorably by a crowd that is nonetheless still working out what, exactly, is his pitch. For the former Maryland governor, who was expected to be Clinton’s primary progressive antagonist until Sanders snatched the mantle from him, it was mostly a relief. Here are POLITICO’s five takeaways from the Democrats’ first cattle call: 1. Hillary’s sensitive to the critique that she’s a candidate of the past On the campaign trail, Clinton repeatedly drops lines about how Republican policies are backward-looking and how she wants to move the country forward. But on Friday night, she slipped beyond that standard campaign fare. Facing recent criticism from Republicans — particularly 40-somethings Marco Rubio and Scott Walker — that she represents the politics of her husband’s White House and the 1990s, Clinton, 67, made clear she is fed up with this argument. “Trickle-down economics has to be one of the worst ideas of the 1980s. It is right up there with New Coke, shoulder pads, and big hair,” she said, in what amounted to catnip to a true blue crowd. “I’m never going to let the Republicans rip away the progress we’ve made. They may have some fresh faces, but they are the party of the past.” The “fresh faces” reference wasn’t just an elbow thrown at Rubio and Walker, however. It also read like a brush-back pitch to O’Malley, whose “new leadership” slogan couldn’t be clearer in its intent. 2. A healthy number of Iowa Democrats are on the same page as Bernie Sanders. But not the majority. Faced with questions about Sanders’ polling surge, Clinton supporters frequently say that 30 to 40 percent of the party fits Bernie’s — or Elizabeth Warren’s — ideological profile, but no more than that. Friday night showed exactly why. Clinton’s speech regularly brought huge portions of the crowd to its feet with her broadsides against Republicans, and then to a hushed, reverent silence when she spoke about her mother’s hard childhood. But while Sanders’ stemwinder drove so many “you tell ‘ems” and “hell yeah”s from the crowd that it occasionally felt like a tent revival, well more than half the room felt no need to even acknowledge Sanders’ most powerful lines. It was as if he was talking to the crowd wearing Bernie ‘16 stickers, but not to anyone else. The bulk of the audience effectively twiddled during the loudest stretches of the Sanders stump speech, leaving the rapturous applause to the designated Bernie tables. The message of political revolution failed to land on ears that weren’t already sympathetic to Sanders, suggesting there are limits to the bounds of his popularity in the state — and within the state party establishment — that by now knows him well. 3. Clinton sees no benefit in acknowledging her Democratic rivals Hillary Clinton had yet to mention any of her Democratic opponents on the campaign trail heading into Friday night. That didn’t change once the evening’s festivities were over, suggesting Clinton won’t start taking on Sanders unless he starts matching or surpassing her in polls. Instead, the former secretary of state went after Jeb Bush, Scott Walker, and Donald Trump by name, throwing the crowd the red meat it so craved and sending a clear message to the audience that she views herself as the front-runner for the nomination. “We’ve heard a lot recently from the new Republican frontrunner, Donald Trump. Finally, a candidate whose hair gets more attention than mine,” she said, to laughs and raucous applause. “Governor Walker kicked off his campaign by rolling back reproductive rights for women and stripping union workers of their rights,” she said to jeers. And to Republicans who avoid discussing climate change by pleading ignorance as non-scientists, Clinton mocked their timidity. “I’m not a scientist either, I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain, and I’m not going to let them take us backwards.” Clinton’s camp sees no need to elevate any of the Democratic rivals trailing her by naming them, and except for a brief nod at the beginning of her speech that did not use any names, she might as well have been the headliner at a political rally for Iowa Democrats. 4. Bernie now recognizes the Democratic Party’s diversity It’s abundantly clear to the Sanders campaign that it has a real candidate on its hands. But the Vermont senator has never had to appeal to minority voters in his heavily white state, and he’s now starting to take up the challenge. After tacking a passage about immigration reform onto his stump speech in front of a Hispanic advocacy group earlier this week, Sanders went much further on Friday, drawing huge applause from his pockets of the room by bringing up disproportionately high African-American incarceration rates and his hope to help undocumented immigrants. Lines like these may be part of any standard liberal stump speech, but Sanders is no standard liberal. His rollicking, red-faced speech on Friday picked up steam with his usual anti-billionaire talk, but there was a noticeable ripple through his delighted supporters when he reached the sections designed to speak to minority voters. 5. O’Malley has the potential to catch fire in Iowa O’Malley plainly showed the most potential in Cedar Rapids, successfully firing up a crowd full of partisans for rival candidates. But his performance also highlighted his central problem as he concentrates on Iowa: he has yet to define whether he wants to be the progressive standard-bearer or the candidate with executive experience. “My name is Martin O’Malley, I’m running for president, and I need your help,” he said, effectively acknowledging from the start that he is still working to gain traction and higher name recognition. The crowd rose to its feet repeatedly over the next 15 minutes as he ticked through a progressive wish-list — from Wall Street reform to sweeping clean energy measures. Nonetheless, O’Malley’s central pitch seemed to be based on the notion that his city hall and governor’s mansion experience would impress. “I am the only candidate for president with fifteen years of executive experience,” he said. “We didn’t just talk about it, we actually got it done.” The two pitches are not mutually exclusive, but they’re separate messages. Without choosing one to center his campaign on, O’Malley appeared to be a compelling character but not necessarily a viable option — at least for now. He finished to serious applause and scattered “O-Mall-ey!” chants. But they were drowned out within seconds by roars from far more enthusiastic backers of the next speaker: “Bernie! Bernie!” *Black Lives Matter' protesters flummox O'Malley, Sanders <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/black-lives-matter-protesters-flummox-omalley-sanders-120319.html> // Politico // Daniel Strauss – July 18, 2015* When Martin O’Malley and Bernie Sanders took the stage at Saturday’s Netroots Nation forum here in Arizona, things didn’t go exactly as planned. Both Democratic presidential candidates were supposed to sit down with activist and journalist Jose Antonio Vargas to talk about immigration. Instead, they got shouted down. O’Malley, the former Maryland governor, was up first, and his forum was hijacked by protesters who said they were from the “Black Lives Matter” movement. They moved toward the stage, chanting, “What side are you on? Black people! What side are you on?” Two of the activists climbed onto the stage and seized the microphones as O’Malley and Vargas stood by patiently. “It’s not like we like shutting shit down but we have to,” activist Patrisse Cullors said. “We are tired of being interrupted.” But shutting things down is what they did. O’Malley was repeatedly drowned out by chanting protesters who wanted to discuss police brutality against black Americans. When O’Malley finally did get a chance to respond, they kept shouting. “I believe every police department in America should have to report in an open and transparent way all police-involved shootings, all discourtesy complaints, all brutality complaints,” O’Malley, a former Baltimore mayor, said. Asked by Vargas about civilian review boards, O’Malley added, “all departments should have civilian review boards.” That was roughly as specific as the protesters allowed O’Malley to get. He went on to say, awkwardly, “black lives matter, white lives matter, all lives matter,” sparking loud boos. O’Malley repeated the phrase and the audience kept booing. Vargas tried to quiet the crowd down, but time was up anyway. “Unfortunately, Senator Sanders is waiting out there,” Vargas said. “We just started,” O’Malley quipped. It started off well: Sanders supporters waved “Bernie” signs in the air as the independent Vermont senator took the stage, hoping to talk about economic policy and bash Republicans. He got chaos instead. “Here’s the serious issue: We live in a nation in which to a significant degree media is controlled by large multinational corporations. We live in a nation in which 95 percent of talk radio is right wing, including in areas where Republicans have almost no support,” Sanders began. The protesters kept shouting, forcing Sanders to address there concerns. “When we talk about issues like ‘black lives matter’, let me tell you something,” Sanders said. “A study came out a few weeks ago talking about youth unemployment in America, an issue we do not deal with as a nation. And here’s what, here’s what that said. What that report said is that if you are a high school graduate and you’re white, the unemployment rate is 33 percent. If you are Hispanic, the unemployment rate is 36 percent; if you are African American, the unemployment rate is 51 percent. And in my view maybe, just maybe, it is time we invest in jobs and education not in jails and incarceration.” The protesters began shouting again when Sanders tried to pivot back to discussing Wall Street greed and economic inequality. At one point, Sanders offered a deviation from his usual talking points: “Black people are dying in this country because we have a criminal justice system that is out of control,” he said. Vargas tried to pepper the Vermont senator with immigration questions, but the chants once again threatened to drown them out. At one point, Sanders’ frustration showed. “Black lives of course matter, but I have spent 50 years of my life fighting for civil rights and if you don’t want me to be here that’s OK,” he said. Once again, time ran out and Vargas said, “Unfortunately we have to wrap it up.” “OK, good,” Sanders said. *O'Malley apologizes for saying 'all lives matter' at liberal conference <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/18/politics/martin-omalley-all-lives-matter/> // CNN // Chris Moody – July 18, 2015 * Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley apologized on Saturday for saying "All lives matter" while discussing police violence against African-Americans with liberal demonstrators. Several dozen demonstrators interrupted the former Maryland governor while he was speaking here at the Netroots Nation conference, a gathering of liberal activists, demanding that he address criminal justice and police brutality. When they shouted, "Black lives matter!" a rallying cry of protests that broke out after several black Americans were killed at the hands of police in recent months, O'Malley responded: "Black lives matter. White lives matter. All lives matter." The demonstrators, who were mostly black, responded by booing him and shouting him down. Later that day, O'Malley apologized for using the phrase in that context if it was perceived that he was minimizing the importance of blacks killed by police. Invoking the familiar names of blacks who died at the hands of police, including Eric Garner, Michael Brown and Tamir Rice, thousands have taken part in protests across the country calling for a more aggressive federal response to recent slayings by police. A protester is arrested at the demonstration on December 13 in Oakland. "I meant no disrespect," O'Malley said in an interview on This Week in Blackness, a digital show. "That was a mistake on my part and I meant no disrespect. I did not mean to be insensitive in any way or communicate that I did not understand the tremendous passion, commitment and feeling and depth of feeling that all of us should be attaching to this issue." Judith Butler, a philosopher at the University of California, Berkeley, recently explained why some find it offensive to respond to the "Black Lives Matter" movement with the "all lives matter." "When some people rejoin with 'All Lives Matter' they misunderstand the problem, but not because their message is untrue. It is true that all lives matter, but it is equally true that not all lives are understood to matter, which is precisely why it is most important to name the lives that have not mattered, and are struggling to matter in the way they deserve," Butler said in an interview with The New York Times. "If we jump too quickly to the universal formulation, 'all lives matter,' then we miss the fact that black people have not yet been included in the idea of 'all lives.'" O'Malley isn't the first Democrat to come under fire for the remark. Hillary Clinton was criticized in June for doing the same thing. *Martin O'Malley And Bernie Sanders Interrupted By ‘Black Lives Matter’ Activists At Progressive Conference <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/martin-omalley-bernie-sanders-heckled_55aab696e4b065dfe89e8a90> // HuffPo // Sam Levine – July 18, 2015 * "Black Lives Matter" protesters interrupted Democratic presidential candidates Martin O'Malley, former governor of Maryland, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) during their appearances Saturday at Netroots Nation, a progressive conference being held in Phoenix this year. O'Malley was interrupted after just one question during a panel discussion with Jose Antonio Vargas, and Sanders had barely begun speaking before he was cut off. Demonstrators began chanting, "What side are you on?" during a Q&A session with O'Malley. O'Malley allowed the protesters to finish, but drew boos when he said that "black lives matter, all lives matter, white lives matter," according to Washington Post reporter Dave Weigel. O'Malley later admitted that he made a mistake in his choice of words, and said he did not mean any disrespect. Sanders was quickly interrupted when he spoke and told protesters that he agreed with them. Sanders tried to continue speaking, but Vargas eventually ended the panel early. While O'Malley and Sanders had a difficult time speaking on Saturday, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic nomination, chose not to attend the conference and was campaigning in Arkansas instead. *Democratic Presidential Candidates Face Off in Iowa <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/democratic-presidential-candidates-make-case-iowa/story?id=32530323> // ABC News // Josh Haskell – July 18, 2015 * It was a big night for Democrats in Iowa who heard from all five presidential candidates on everything from income inequality to climate change and recent Supreme Court decisions on same-sex marriage and the Affordable Care Act. Lincoln Chafee, Hillary Clinton, Martin O'Malley, Bernie Sanders, and Jim Webb didn't spend any time going after each other Friday, but instead laid out their visions for the country and at times went after the Republican presidential candidates. Clinton spent the majority of her speech criticizing Republicans by name -- including former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush -- whose comments that "Americans need to work longer hours" didn't sit well with the former secretary of state. "He now says he just wants part-time workers to be able to find full-time jobs," she said. "So do I. There’s just one problem: his policies and the policies of all these Republican candidates would make that harder." Hillary Clinton Thinks Telemarketers Are 'Really Annoying,' Too Hillary Clinton Cashes in, Donald Trump Dead Last in 2016 Campaign Money Race Bernie Sanders Gets His Say on Clinton's Day in Capitol But the Democratic front-runner didn't stop with Bush. Clinton and O'Malley also went after billionaire Donald Trump. “We've heard a lot recently from the new Republican front-runner, Donald Trump," said Clinton. "Finally, a candidate whose hair gets more attention than mine. But there’s nothing funny about the hate he is spewing towards immigrants and their families." "If Donald Trump wants to run on a platform of demonizing immigrants, he should go back to the 1840's and run for the presidential nomination of the Know-Nothing Party," said O'Malley. The night began with the five candidates taking the stage together as loud chants of Bernie and Hillary filled the room. More than 1,300 from across the state greeted the candidates with open arms and listened to each 15 minute speech with the same amount of attention but varying levels of enthusiasm. Clinton, O'Malley, and Sanders had a number of standing ovations from their backers in the room, but lesser known candidates Chafee and Webb had a harder sell. They laid out their visions for the country, spending a considerable amount of time telling Iowans about their accomplishments as public servants. Sanders was the only candidate to bring up recent race-related shootings in America. "I want to see an America where when young black men walk down the street, they will not be harassed by police officers," he said, pausing when the crowd gave him a standing ovation. Raising his hands, Sanders added "They will not be killed and not be shot." Outside the convention hall, O'Malley and Clinton supporters who didn't have tickets to the dinner chanted at each other as cars honked in downtown Cedar Rapids. All of the candidates stayed till the end of the event and worked the room afterwards. The politicking continues Saturday in Iowa as 10 Republican presidential candidates will discuss their vision for the country at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames. *Sanders, O'Malley face protesters at Netroots Nation conference <http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-sanders-omalley-netroots-nation-20150718-story.html> // LA Times // Nigel Duara – July 18, 2015 * e annual Netroots Nation political conference, being held here this year, isn’t just supposed to be friendly to progressive candidates. It is an applause-filled jaunt that can add luster to campaigns whose candidates want to be standard-bearers of the liberal wing of the Democratic Party. That was far from the case on Saturday, the showcase day of the five-day event that began Wednesday, as former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont found themselves face-to-face with protesters, led by supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement. Black lives matter, white lives matter, all lives matter. - Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, to a chorus of boos Black Lives Matter was fueled by several high-profile deaths of unarmed black men at the hands of police in the last two years, and the slogan has been the rallying cry for a series of protests calling for social justice. Saturday’s verbal confrontation first came during O’Malley’s town hall meeting. He had just delivered what should have been applause lines at such a conference — closing for-profit prisons and ending wealth inequality — when about 30 protesters streamed into the Phoenix Convention Center’s main hall and began shouting questions: “What are you doing to stop the killing of black men?” “Do black lives matter to you?” Seated onstage, hands clasped and elbows on his knees, O’Malley in response turned his speech over to related issues: creating civilian review boards for police departments, pushing through criminal justice reform and asking the same of other candidates. A protester was invited on stage. “I recognize the pain and grief throughout country, to all the lives lost to violence,” O’Malley said, to tepid applause, before expounding on the efforts he made when he was mayor of Baltimore to end an epidemic of violence and drug abuse. Then, after the 15-minute interruption, O’Malley said, “Black lives matter, white lives matter, all lives matter.” He was roundly booed. He repeated the line. More boos followed. He eventually waved to the crowd as he left the stage. Sanders next took the stage with the protest in full swing, but nevertheless muscled his way through. He scoffed at questions about what he has done for the civil rights movement, replying that he’s spent 50 years fighting for civil rights. “We need a political revolution in this country,” said Sanders, sticking to the grass-roots progressive message that has earned him crowds in the tens of thousands at appearances across the country. The difference, said conference attendee Lexis Clark of Chicago, was that O’Malley seemed to waffle and waver during the protest, while Sanders, used to long, loud debates, simply boomed his way through the interruptions. “I wasn’t blown away” by O’Malley, said Clark, 30. “He didn’t do a very good job controlling it.” To the protesters themselves, neither candidate did much to assure them that the goals of the Black Lives Matter movement would be considered. “They all fumbled when we brought black issues to the table,” said Ashley Yates, 30, one of Saturday’s protest leaders. “That was by design.” It wasn’t the first time a presidential candidate has been roundly booed at the conference. At the 2007 event, Hillary Rodham Clinton, in her first presidential campaign, heard boos for being too centrist and for voting in favor of the Iraq war. She skipped this year’s event. The conference, held this year in Phoenix in an attempt by organizers to plant a flag in a red state, issued a statement less than an hour after Saturday’s protest to say it “stands in solidarity with all people seeking human rights.” “Our aim was to give presidential candidates a chance to respond to the issues facing the many diverse communities represented here,” conference organizers said in an email. “Although we wish the candidates had more time to respond to the issues, what happened today is reflective of an urgent moment that America is facing today.” Yates was unconvinced. While candidates’ plans on issues such as banking reform and wage inequality have specifics — whom they would appoint, what steps they would take on Day One — they’ve been vague when it comes to pushing for racial and social justice. “You can’t hold anyone accountable for something they haven’t agreed to yet,” Yates said, adding that Netroots, for all its progressive leanings, remained a largely white space. “Let’s be honest: It’s mostly white, concerning white issues,” Yates said, “when we are out here dying.” *'Black Lives Matter' protesters halt Sanders, O’Malley events <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/248430-black-lives-matter-protesters-halt-omalley-event> // The Hill // Mark Hensch – July 18, 2015 * “Black Lives Matter” protesters disrupted two 2016 Democratic presidential candidates during speeches in Phoenix on Saturday. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley both had question-and-answer sessions halted at the 2015 Netroots Nation conference. “Say that black lives matter,” demonstrators chanted at both men. “Say that I am not a criminal. Say my name.” Activists began intruding on the event during O’Malley’s session with host Jose Antonio Vargas. “What side are you on?” they began singing at the former Maryland governor. Vargas tried salvaging the situation, but protesters only shouted over him louder. “We hear you,” he said. “Everyone take a little breathe.” The flustered moderator then let a “Black Lives Matter” leader who identified herself as Patrisse Cullors address O’Malley. “Let me be clear – every single day people are dying, not able to take another breath,” she said. “We are in a state of emergency,” she added. “If you do not feel that emergency, then you are not human. I want to hear concrete action plans.” O’Malley responded by appealing to the unity of Americans that comes from their shared country. “I think all of us have a responsibility to recognize the pain and grief caused by lives lost to violence,” he said. “Black lives matter. White lives matter. All lives matter,” O’Malley added, drawing boos from the demonstrators. An apology to O’Malley flashed on the event’s teleprompter once the disruption began, according to reports. Sanders fared little better with outraged crowd members when his session began. “If you don’t want to be here, that’s OK,” he said over yelling attendees. “I don’t want to shout over people.” “Black lives of course matter,” Sanders added. “I have spent 50 years of my life fighting for civil rights.” Sanders argued criminal justice reform is essential for improving race relations in the U.S. “Black people are dying in this country because we have a criminal justice system that is out of control,” he said. “We need fundamental reform in police departments all over this country,” Sanders said. “In my view, maybe, just maybe, it is time to invest in jobs and not jails and incarceration,” he added. Protesters hailed the two-year anniversary of the “Black Lives Matter” movement during their demonstration at Saturday’s event. The protesters say law enforcement unfairly discriminates against blacks in both its policies and its enforcement. *Democratic candidates turn dinner into a GOP bashing party <http://nypost.com/2015/07/18/democratic-candidates-turn-dinner-into-a-gop-bashing-party/> // NY Post // Bob Fredericks – July 18, 2015 * All five declared candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination gathered at a party dinner in Iowa Friday night and took turns bashing Republicans while mostly playing nice with each other. Hillary Rodham Clinton, the front-runner, and socialist Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, her toughest challenger so far, got most of the attention at the Hall of Fame celebration dinner, but ex-Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee and ex-Virginia Sen. Jim Webb were also on hand. Clinton used tough rhetoric to go after the GOP candidates and brought Democrats to their feet, The Washington Post reported. “I’m never going to let the Republicans rip away the progress we have made. Trickle-down economics has to be one of the worst ideas of the 1980s. It is right up there with New Coke, shoulder pads and big hair,” she said. *‘Black Lives Matter!’: Sanders, O’Malley Heckled by Liberal Demonstrators at Blogger Convention; Clinton a No-Show <http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/07/18/black-lives-matter-sanders-omalley-heckled-by-liberal-demonstrators-at-blogger-convention-clinton-a-no-show/> // The Blaze // Dave Urbanski – July 18, 2015 * The demonstrators were promoting the national “Black Lives Matter” movement, which has sought changes to law enforcement policies in the aftermath of sometimes-violent protests in several cities. The group grew from the fatal shooting of a black, unarmed 18-year-old, Michael Brown, by a white police officer in the St. Louis suburb. Sanders and O’Malley are vying to become the alternative to Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was campaigning in Iowa and Arkansas on Saturday and did not attend Netroots. Before the demonstrations broke out, Vargas pressed O’Malley to defend his law enforcement record as Baltimore’s mayor a decade ago. O’Malley faced scrutiny when unrest broke out in his home city after an African-American man, Freddie Gray, died while in police custody in April. O’Malley discussed his work to deal with violence and drug addiction in Baltimore, telling the crowd, “there are very few issues in our country that are quite as painfully intertwined as the legacy of violence, race and law enforcement in America.” He said his policies improved policing, reduced the number of police-involved shootings and increased drug treatment. About 20 minutes into the interview, demonstrators walked into the cavernous ballroom, creating a confusing scene. Tia Oso, National Coordinator for the Black Alliance for Just Immigration in Phoenix, took the stage and addressed the crowd, noting two years had passed since the the Black Lives Matter movement started. “We want to take a moment at Netroots to acknowledge the lives lost,” Oso said. Organizers sought to restore order and at one point, Cheryl Contee, a Netroots Nation board member, took the stage and asked the audience to allow O’Malley to respond. O’Malley said all Americans have a responsibility to “recognize the pain and the grief throughout our country, through all the lives that have been lost to violence.” He reiterated that every police department should be required to report all police-involved shootings and create civilian review boards. “Black lives matter. White lives matter. All lives matter,” O’Malley told the crowd, as some protesters heckled him. Sanders, during his abbreviated 20 minute appearance, spoke about the need to address wealth and income inequality, noting that blacks and Hispanics face high rates of unemployment. His remarks were interrupted at times by the protesters, prompting Sanders to respond, “Black lives of course matter. I spent 50 years of my life fighting for civil rights.” Sanders called the criminal justice system “out of control” and described high rates of unemployment and incarceration for young black Americans. Netroots Nation executive director Raven Brooks said in a statement that the organization “stands in solidarity with all people seeking human rights.” He said Netroots aimed to give presidential candidates to respond to the issues faced by many diverse communities. “Although we wish the candidates had more time to respond to the issues, what happened today is reflective of an urgent moment that America is facing today,” Brooks said. Here’s another video taken Saturday of demonstrators chanting “This is what democracy looks like!” apparently while exiting a large conference room. *O’Malley Apologizes For Saying ‘All Lives Matter’ <http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/18/omalley-apologizes-for-saying-all-lives-matter-video/> // Daily Caller // Derek Hunter – July 18, 2015 * Former Maryland Gov. and Democratic Party presidential candidate Martin O’Malley, along with fellow candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, were shouted off stage at the Netroots Nation conference in Phoenix, Ariz., Saturday. O’Malley’s offense was saying, “Black lives matter, white lives matter, all lives matter.” O’Malley has now apologized for including “white lives matter, all lives matter” in his statement. The Black Lives Matter movement on the extreme progressive left does not tolerate inclusion of all lives, or any other lives when it comes to mattering. Appearing on the Internet based “This Week In Blackness,” or TWiB Nation, host L. Joy Williams excoriated O’Malley for his insensitivity for including “white lives” and “all lives” in his statement. The former governor did not repeat the phrases, he referred to them as “those other two phrases.” “I want to ask something specifically,” Williams said, “Towards the end, in your explanation, you said the phrase ‘all lives matter,’ you said the phrase ‘white lives matter.’ But I want to ask you, do you understand the difference in responding in that conversation, in that context, with ‘all lives matter’ or ‘white lives matter’ when we’re specifically talking about black death, that is not all inclusive.” O’Malley responded, “I certainly do and, in fact, I believe what I first said was that ‘black lives matter’ before those other two phrases. And when I said those other two phrases I meant no disrespect to the point, which I understand, that black lives matter is making.” *O'Malley, Sanders Shouted Down at Netroots by 'Black Lives Matter' Protest <http://www.nationaljournal.com/2016-elections/o-malley-sanders-shouted-down-at-netroots-by-black-lives-matter-protest-20150718> // The National Journal // S.V. Dante – July 18, 2015 * Protesters upset that the topic of police shootings in black communities was not getting a high enough profile at the Netroots Nation conference shut down a much-touted forum Saturday featuring two Democratic presidential candidates. Several dozen activists burst into the Phoenix Convention Center meeting hall as former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley was 20 minutes into a planned 40-minute moderated discussion. They sang – "What side are you on, people, what side are you on?" -- chanted, and eventually were given a microphone by conference organizers to ask O'Malley a question about police-involved violence. "We hear you," Netroots board member Cheryl Contee said from the stage. "Give the governor a chance to respond." O'Malley has been dogged by his record as Baltimore mayor since rioting there this year following the death of an unarmed black man in police custody. When his answer started describing some of his actions as mayor, the protesters began shouting him down again. And when he said, "Black lives matter, white lives matter, all lives matter," the protesters roared in disapproval. O'Malley left the stage not long after. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, whose supporters had packed the hall, was similarly interrupted. Sanders tried to deliver a truncated version of his stump speech, only louder, in an attempt to drown out the protesters. When he was asked what his plan was to deal with police violence, he brought it back to a favorite topic of his, high unemployment in the black community, which he would solve with a trillion dollar program rebuilding the nation's infrastructure. That answer failed to satisfy the protesters, who continued shouting and chanting until moderator Jose Antonio Vargas told Sanders that they had to wrap it up. Sanders replied: "Okay, good." The protesters held a victory rally of sorts afterward. "People only yell when they feel they're not being heard," said one. Ashley Yates, an activist who came to prominence in St. Louis during the riots there last year following the police shooting of a black man, was among the leaders of Saturday's protest. "We're telling you that black America is starved for resources and we are in a state of emergency," she said. As to whether the disrupted discussion would make it harder for Netroots to attract presidential candidates in the future, Yates said: "That's Netroots' question to answer." For its part, Netroots declined to criticize the protest. "Although we wish the candidates had more time to respond to the issues, what happened today is reflective of an urgent moment that America is facing today," the group said in a statement. "In 2016, we're heading to St. Louis. We plan to work with activists there just as we did in Phoenix with local leaders, including the #BlackLivesMatter movement, to amplify issues like racial profiling and police brutality in a major way." Sanders continued with plans for a Saturday evening rally at the same Convention Center venue, while O'Malley held a discussion with local immigration activists Saturday afternoon. *Martin O'Malley Was Booed For Saying "All Lives Matter," & Here's Why That Phrase Should Just Disappear <http://www.bustle.com/articles/98176-martin-omalley-was-booed-for-saying-all-lives-matter-heres-why-that-phrase-should-just> // Bustle // Chris Togonotti – July 18, 2015 * Saturday was a big day for Democratic presidential candidate Martin O’Malley. Despite serving two terms as the governor of Maryland and being one of just five Democrats in the 2016 field, he’s getting pretty overlooked in the early going. So, like Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, he decided to speak at Netroots Nation, a good opportunity to draw some attention at a high-profile progressive event. And draw some attention he did, for all the wrong reasons: Martin O’Malley was booed for saying “all lives matter,” and he really should have seen that one coming. Look, there’s no denying that O’Malley was probably a little thrown off his game. His appearance was interrupted by seemingly organized chants before the offending flap, an interruption that culminated in activists taking the stage and getting on the mic. That has to be a little disorienting, regardless of whether you’re sympathetic to him or not. But that kind of a moment can speak volumes, too – about how someone responds to a breakdown in the pre-arranged order of things, and how they choose to communicate about the most raw, serious issues for a given community. Here’s are three reasons why Martin O’Malley got booed, and why “all lives matter” really needs to go away. It’s An Unneeded Statement Think about the phrase black lives matter, and all the events that culminated to birth the movement. Mainly, instances of black people being slain by police without any legal action afterward. Michael Brown in Ferguson, no indictment. Eric Garner in New York City and John Crawford in Ohio – both men’s deaths captured on video – no indictments. It’s true that all lives do and should matter, but the point is that when black lives are lost, society doesn’t treat it as such. Institutionally, and in the hearts and minds of countless racist trolls you can find in all corners of the internet, black lives matter less. Which is why it’s so important to specifically name that, and to be unapologetic about it. Stealing Black Activist Language Is Offensive Think of it like this: have you ever seen supporters of law enforcement tweet #BlueLivesMatter? It became a thing after the murder of NYPD officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu late last year, and you still see it from time to time. But beyond being intensely inflammatory – appropriating black activism against police brutality in service of law enforcement – it crucially misses the point. After officers Liu and Ramos were killed, what happened? Their tragic deaths were national news, everybody knew their names, and there was a massive police and public response. The loss of life was treated as unacceptable and horrifying, and not just by police officers and their supporters, but by the public at large. And, had the perpetrator not killed himself shortly after the murders, he undoubtedly would have been hunted relentlessly and brought to justice. That’s the difference. Basically, if you’re a white authority figure invoking the language of black activists, you should only do so address the issues, not dilute them. He Didn’t Just Say “All Lives Matter” In reality, O’Malley’s remarks were even a little bit worse than a simple “all lives matter” would have been. In full, while discussing how Maryland halted the death penalty under his watch, O’Malley said the following (the relevant portion starts at 59 minutes in). Every life matters, and that is why this issue is so important. Black lives matter, white lives matter, all lives matter. … Black lives matter. White lives matter. All lives matter. O’Malley must’ve felt some conviction about this, because he repeated it even with the boos and jeers still raining down from the first time. But, both in tone and in execution, it was an epic blunder. He came off, quite frankly, as though he were lecturing black people about their own movement. The argument of activists isn’t that white lives don’t matter, it’s that black lives should matter every bit as much. In fact, over the din of the crowd, you can make out a man’s voice yelling just that. We don’t need to hear that all lives matter! We already know that all lives matter! In short, it came across as incredibly condescending, and made it seem as though O’Malley hadn’t put enough thought into such a loaded remark. *GOP* *DECLARED* *BUSH* *Raising money is a Jeb Bush family business, even for the next generation <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/raising-money-is-a-jeb-bush-family-business-even-for-the-next-generation/2015/07/18/440d390a-2d66-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html> // WaPo // Ed O’Keefe – July 18, 2015 * Politically, Jeb Bush wants voters to focus on his first name and his own political record. But when it comes to fundraising, he’s still banking on the success of his last name. He hosted wealthy donors, many of whom backed his father and brother’s presidential bids, at his parents’ coastal estate in Maine this month. And on Friday night, he headlined a raucous dinner hosted by a PAC led in part by his two sons. It was held in a Venetian Hotel ballroom next to the theater where Diana Ross performs. The group cannot officially endorse in the presidential race, so Bush and his family are drawing inspiration from the PAC as he continues fundraising. But the PAC is an outgrowth of the 2004 reelection campaign of George W. Bush — so, in essence, Jeb Bush is learning the lessons of his older brother. With his father sidelined by injury and his brother staying out of the fray, Bush is deploying his wife and sons to appear at some of the 17 major fundraising events in 11 states and the District of Columbia that are scheduled through September. Bush raised $11.4 million for his campaign in the last quarter — he was a candidate for just 16 days of the period. The sum was part of an unprecedented $119 million raised on his behalf by an allied super PAC and another leadership PAC. Most of his campaign money came from donors cultivated by the Bush family for more than 40 years. Just $368,000 came from people giving less than $200. Bush himself gave more to his campaign — $388,720 — to cover expenses. Asked about the paltry sum of donations from small-dollar donors, Bush says that there will be plenty of time to cultivate grass-roots supporters. “We had 16 days, and we wanted to send a statement of seriousness about the campaign. It was launched, and, in 16 days, we raised $11 million. I’m proud of that,” he told reporters last week. “We’ll have ample time to broaden that out. That’s the intention.” For now, Bush is focused on bigger dollars, and his appearance on Friday night was a tacit acknowledgment of the work his sons are doing to help. He appeared at a conference hosted by Maverick PAC, a group of wealthy Republicans under the age of 40 who support GOP political candidates of a similar age. The PAC was launched in Texas by about a dozen of George W. Bush’s “Mavericks,” or young professionals who helped raise at least $50,000 in 2004. In 2006, George P. Bush — Jeb’s older son — joined the group and became chairman in 2010. He expanded the PAC beyond Texas to include more than 20 chapters, with several in Florida and one in London. As Texas land commissioner, George P. Bush can no longer actively participate, but his friend, Jay Zeidman, kicked off the event Friday night. He stood in jeans and a button-down shirt handing out awards to winners of a “40 under 40” prize while attendees dined on chicken and pork barbecue, cole slaw and potato salad. Spotted in the crowd was Charlie Spies, a Republican campaign finance lawyer, who represents Maverick PAC and Right to Rise USA, the super PAC allied with Jeb Bush that raised a record $103 million last quarter. Two younger conservative authors, Guy Benson and Kristen Soltis Anderson, sat onstage sipping beer while touting their books. Benson admitted he’d spent most of the day drinking by the hotel pool. Both lamented that too many liberals rely on comedians Jon Stewart and John Oliver for their news and bemoaned the “stifling culture of political correctness.” Bush applauded enthusiastically from the front of the room. He was later introduced to the crowd by Fritz Brogan, a Washington restaurateur who worked in George W. Bush’s administration and has grown close to Jeb Bush Jr. Jeb Bush thanked his younger son for his early help and called out his wife, Columba, who was in the crowd. “We’ve been married longer than the age of retirement of a MavPAC member,” he said. Father and son later headed upstairs to Bouchon, the French restaurant by chef Thomas Keller, where they hosted a kickoff reception for “Mission: NEXT” — essentially the 2016 version of George W. Bush’s “Mavericks” group. In a nod to his home state of Florida, Jeb Bush’s donor program is called “Mission 2016 JEB” — a NASA-inspired title for a program that will have three distinct tiers for top bundlers. The first tier, called Apollo, will be for bundlers who can help Bush raise at least $75,000. The second tier, called Endeavour, is for donors who reach at least $150,000. Top-flight bundlers will reach the Voyager level as they help rake in at least $250,000. Mission: NEXT will be for donors under 40 who can help raise at least $50,000. George P. and Jeb Bush Jr. will co-chair the group and said in a joint statement that it “will be the central program for youth involvement in the campaign.” Through a spokesman, George P. Bush declined an interview request. Jeb Bush Jr. said in a recent interview that when he meets with potential supporters, “I try to share my experience with Dad, working with him the last six years, what he’s like as a dad or a grandfather, his experience in Florida as governor. And talk about potential solutions for things like student debt, the job market, health care, things that are facing millennials.” The two brothers have tapped their own professional networks — wooing junior executives such as Zeidman, business executives such as Brogan and attorneys, surgeons, investment bankers, accountants and other young professionals in Texas, Florida and elsewhere. Andres Asion, a Miami real estate broker who is backing Jeb Bush and is friends with Jeb Bush Jr., said the brothers “have been raised in the business, per se, and they know their market and they know what they’re doing very well.” Watching Bush’s new plans unfold are several former members of Maverick PAC who have aged out and remain active in GOP politics and fundraising. Jonathan Neerman, the former chairman of the Dallas County Republican Party, called the group “a starter PAC” that “was an introduction to the bundling world at a donor level that was not cost-prohibitive. Its genesis was really a networking opportunity for young bundlers from around the state to stay connected.” Another presidential candidate, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), is a founding member and standout alumnus. His campaign chairman, Chad Sweet, is a former member. “I’ve been tremendously impressed by the success of MavPAC over the years, serving as a vehicle for young professionals to play a meaningful role in the political process,” Cruz said in an interview. Clearly, Cruz learned from the experience: Despite trailing far back in most polls, he raised $14 million for his campaign last quarter and another $37 million through a constellation of super PACs backing his campaign. The combined $51 million put him just behind Bush in the GOP money race. *Jeb Bush consultant critiques Republican digital culture <https://www.yahoo.com/politics/jeb-bush-consultant-critiques-republican-digital-124448872556.html> // Yahoo News // Jon Ward – July 18, 2015 * A top digital consultant to Jeb Bush’s presidential campaign had harsh words for Republican technologists on Saturday, saying that many of them are “impostors” and that the GOP has until recently been an “atrociously bad” place for tech savvy people who wanted to get involved in politics. The Republican party “was a terrible place for a smart technologist to come work,” Andy Barkett, a former Facebook engineer, said at a conference on technology and politics hosted by Lincoln Labs, a conservative nonprofit group. Barkett, who was hired by the Republican National Committee as its chief technology officer two years ago, made reference to his time at the RNC, which did not go smoothly. “I mean it was a terrible place for me when I started. It was horrible. It was like the worst experience of my life,” Barkett said of his entry into Republican politics, after spending over a decade at Silicon Valley companies, where he moved into angel investing on the side. “It was just, like, atrociously bad.” Barkett was brought in after the RNC conducted an “autopsy” of the 2012 election that concluded they lagged far behind the Democrats in using technology to target voters for persuasion and turnout. But Barkett said that Republican digital culture “is getting better, and now for the first time since I’ve been involved in it over the last few years, you can take a smart person and plug them in and they can be really effective and make a difference.” And yet, Barkett, 34, said that too many people in Republican politics, and political culture in general, still are too ignorant of basic technology. “There’s a whole bunch of people in politics who say a lot of words, all the buzz words that we talked about, and they say, ‘I want more analytics.’ None of them have any idea what any of those things mean,” he said, seated on a stage during a panel discussion alongside digital operatives working for the presidential campaigns of Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida) and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. “They have no idea what the difference is between building an infrastructure of servers that knows how to send e-mails, to having an e-mail list, or the difference between the records in the voter file and the analytics that you do in addition to those,” he said. Barkett urged people in politics doing tech-related work to “get over the impostor syndrome and learn what the f you are talking about.” “Be honest with yourself, you’re probably a political person and you probably don’t know what the f you’re taking about. And the first thing you should do is probably dig in and learn. In the short run it will hurt you, because you will be exposed as a fraud,” he said. “You people will learn that you don’t know these things yet. And in the long run it will help you, because you will then be one of the one percent of the people in politics who does know what they’re talking about.” Yahoo Politics asked Barkett during the panel whether he was criticizing the 200 or so Republicans working in the tech space, and he clarified his comments. “I wouldn’t say all 200 of them are complete phonies. I would say that a lot of them are good at one thing or another. So a lot of them may be very good at online fundraising, which is a thing, which is important, or they may be very good at online advertising in a political context, which is a thing that’s important,” Barkett said. “There’s not a lot of people who are genuinely well-rounded technology leaders. It’s a pretty small percentage of that number.” Barkett is a controversial figure in Republican politics. His blunt style of communication and willingness to openly criticize other vendors and consultants quickly created many enemies when he arrived at the RNC. Less than a year after being hired by the RNC and its private sector data arm, Data Trust, to do work at both entities, he left Data Trust and went to work only at the RNC. One of Barkett’s biggest tasks at the RNC was to build a digital dashboard to access voter file data. That dashboard, which was called Beacon, never acquired a high user adoption rate and has been eclipsed by other platforms. The RNC is currently working on a new dashboard that they hope will compete with the one being delivered to a growing number of Republican campaigns by the Koch brothers political arm, Freedom Partners, through a subsidiary called i360. Barkett is now doing work for Bush’s campaign through a company called Digital Core Campaign, LLC, which was paid $64,216 on June 30 for “web service.” DCC advertises on its website that they do “big data infrastructure,” “modeling and analytics,” “digital communications,” and “field and finance integration.” The New York Times reported earlier this year that Barkett would be building a voter file to be used by both Bush’s campaign and the super PAC supporting the former Florida governor. Barkett on Saturday referred to Bush as his “client.” *How Jeb Tackled the Cocaine Cartels <file:///C:\Users\aphillips\Downloads\How%20Jeb%20Tackled%20the%20Cocaine%20Cartels> // The Daily Beast // Betsy Woodruff – July 18, 2015 * It was an October day in Miami, 1985, and Leonel Martinez didn’t want to die. Margarita Escobar—a Colombian woman known as La Doctora and rumored to be a distant relative of Pablo Escobar—had paid Martinez, a construction magnate, a hefty sum to move 12 duffel bags of cocaine from The Bahamas to Miami on his luxury yacht. The load got intercepted en route, though, and La Doctora wanted her money back. But Martinez didn’t have it. So she called him up and said she would be visiting his office. Martinez did the natural thing: He bought a Cadillac limousine, sent it to pick up her and her bodyguard at the airport—in an effort to project wealth he didn’t quite have—and welcomed her to his office. She demanded he produce the cash. He didn’t have it, and he offered her ten condominiums instead. But that wasn’t good enough. Give her the money, she said, or she’d kill him. “You can kill me, or you can wait,” he replied. She decided to wait, and she flew back to Colombia. Then Martinez got to work rustling up the thousands he owed her. Overlooking that conversation was a wall plastered with pictures of Martinez glad-handing some of South Florida’s most powerful political luminaries. That’s because the drug-trafficker—according to retired DEA agent and a retired Metro Dade police officer who worked to hunt him down—had a knack for creating the illusion of intimacy with elected officials. A few of those officials had the last name Bush. But those donations didn’t get him much. In fact, as governor, Jeb Bush became a favorite of drug warriors. He mirrored his father’s tough-on-drugs tactics in Florida, won the loyalty of cops and DEA agents, and showed the limits of money in politics. When Jeb arrived in South Florida after the 1980 presidential campaign, it was a crazy time. The use of drug money in politics was commonplace. In fact, his dad’s presidential campaign and the Jeb-helmed Dade County Republican Party both took contributions from Martinez, and faced minimal political repercussions when Martinez’s true career was revealed. Eduardo Gamarra, a professor in Florida International University’s department of politics and international relations, said at that time Southern Florida was so saturated with cocaine-tainted cash that it would have been odd if none of it could get traced to Jeb. “That’s just the way things were in the 1980’s,” he said. Gamarra added that grip-and-grin photos with drug dealers didn’t immediately mean the politician was in league with them. Even then-state attorney Janet Reno appeared in a photo with Martinez when he was being investigated for bribery. Martinez moved from Cuba to Miami when Castro rose to power, and he proceeded to build a successful construction business—with a lucrative marijuana- and cocaine-trafficking business on the side. He also made a number of contributions to the Dade County Republican Party when young Jeb Bush chaired it, as Jack Colhoun detailed in an essay in the anthology Covert Action: The Roots of Terrorism. Martinez won respect in Republican circles and, according to his former defense attorney Ron Dresnick, even managed to snag a photo with Jeb. It was never released. This came at a time when Jeb was laying some of the groundwork for the GOP’s eventual and total takeover of state-level politics there. In 1984, Politico wrote, 4,000 Democrats became Republicans and 74 percent of Hispanics to join the voter rolls that year registered with the GOP. That success ballooned, and Bush carried Miami-Dade in both of his successful gubernatorial campaigns. His impact in the Sunshine State is hard to overstate. And a tiny little statistically insignificant sliver of it was thanks to coke money. “Just like today everybody has to be a badass when it comes to fighting terrorists, the 80’s and 90’s were really the same. You had to demonstrate that you were a drug warrior.” By 1989, Martinez was unmasked as a narcotrafficker. The Miami Herald reported that he had promised to give a covert Drug Enforcement Administration informant a dump truck worth $80,000 and five lots worth $120,000 in exchange for 300 kilograms of cocaine. The Herald also noted that, in a government affidavit, between 1981 and 1989 Martinez and his team endeavored to move hundreds of pounds of marijuana and “multi-hundred kilogram shipments of cocaine” into Southern Florida. As one does. The Martinez case was representative of a South Florida cocaine problem of cartoonish proportions—a culture where Jeb’s political ambitions first began to flourish. “It was a nuthouse,” recalled Tom Raffanello, a former Special Agent in Charge of the DEA’s Miami Field Division, who had that position for three years of Jeb’s governorship there. “We averaged two drug-related shootings a month for almost two years. Everybody had a gun. Everybody was pissed off all the time.” Tony Kost, a retired Metro-Dade Police Department detective who worked to apprehend Martinez, Dominic Albanese (a retired DEA agent who worked on the investigation), and Raffanello all praised Jeb’s work to continue the prosecution of the Drug War that started when his father, George HW Bush, was vice president for Ronald Reagan. It’s an interesting story of the failure of money in politics; though Martinez managed to donate his way into the good graces of South Florida Republicans, some of his favorite politicians ended up being the most dogged foes of his industry. Albanese said that Jeb Bush’s support of the War on Drugs—despite inadvertently appearing in a photo with a powerful drug trafficker—speaks to his integrity. “I can’t say enough good things about what the Bushes did for the anti-drug department, I’m telling you now,” he added. “I know where we would have been if it wasn’t for them. We’d be in deep kimchi right now, I’m telling you, with the drug problems.” Jeb Bush appointed the state’s first drug czar, Jim McDonough, just a month after he assumed office. McDonough’s responsibilities included coordinating statewide efforts to curtail the import and distribution of narcotics. Bush prioritized streamlining the communications between different agencies and governments—local, state, and federal—to make anti-drug efforts more efficient. Gamarra, a Democrat, also said taking Martinez’s cocaine cash shouldn’t taint the Bush family’s anti-drug legacy. “It’s kind of popular to go around saying we’ve lost the drug war,” he said, “but South Florida really demonstrates how they built up the correct kind of legislation—financial controls and so on.” “You’re not going to find an airplane flying into the Everglades dumping cocaine,” he added. “Miami has drug problems today but this is not the 1980’s by any stretch of the imagination.” Gamarra described Bush and his team as “the best drug warriors in town.” “Just like today everybody has to be a badass when it comes to fighting terrorists, the 80’s and 90’s were really the same,” he continued. “You had to demonstrate that you were a drug warrior, that you were in favor of al the extreme kind of measures to stop drugs coming into the United States.” Data from the U.S. Department of Justice indicates that total violent crime grew at a slower rate than Florida’s overall population during Bush’s governorship. While the population grew steadily, from 15.1 million people in 1999 to 18.3 million in 2007, the number of violent crimes committed in the state ebbed and flowed. In 1999, there were 129,044 total violent offenses. That number dipped to a low of 123,754 in 2004. And it grew to 129,602 in 2006, his last full year as governor. The fact that violent crime didn’t grow at the same rate as the population seems to corroborate the anecdotal evidence from South Florida’s top drug warriors—that, with time, the state became less bloody. Raffanello said Bush’s efforts to improve communication between local sheriffs, the DEA, and other law enforcement arms were particularly fruitful. As governor, he and his wife Columba participated in yearly Tallahassee summits that brought together the state’s drug warriors for networking, planning, and coordination. Raffanello said the impact of those meetings—and the impact of the governor’s involvement with them—made statewide enforcement efforts more organized and effective. “I thought he really gave a shit,” Raffanello said. “It’s refreshing to see a politician care about an issue.” So his efforts seem to have made Florida less violent and crazy, but Gamarra said the overall outcome was mixed. While drug-related violence went down, there weren’t great results as far as overall drug use. “The objective of all of this stuff was to stop the flow of drugs into the United States,” he said. “And we have just as many drugs coming into the United States today as we did in 1985. And the price is cheaper and quality of the drugs is better.” Still, Raffanello said Jeb’s greatest impact was the shift of drug violence from the Sunshine State to the U.S./Mexico border, saying the violence in Florida decreased “exponentially.” “We probably had three of the most successful years we had in the last two decades,” he said. *Talk of rolling back Obama’s Iran nuclear deal on day one is not ‘mature’ <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/18/jeb-bush-talk-of-rolling-back-obamas-iran-nuclear-/> // The Washington Times // Kellan Howell – July 18, 2015 * Jeb Bush told a Nevada audience on Friday that he would not repeal President Obama’s Iran nuclear agreement on day one. Speaking in Carson City, the former Florida governor reiterated his opposition to the deal, which will ease economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for a decade of limitations to it’s nuclear program. But Mr. Bush stopped short of promising he would dismantle the deal and denounced other Republicans who have promised to do so, calling them panderers, Politico reported. “At 12:01 on January, whatever it is, 19th [2017], I will probably have a confirmed secretary of state; I will not have a confirmed national security team in place; I will not have consulted with our allies. I will not have had the intelligence briefings to have made a decision,” Mr. Bush said, Politico reported. “If you’re running for president, I think it’s important to be mature and thoughtful about this.” Mr. Bush said he would never have negotiated with Iran in the first place and told the crowd of roughly 100 people at the town hall that he doesn’t discredit Mr. Obama for doing so, but for not negotiating harder. “I’m deeply worried about this agreement because I think it’s going to create the possibility of nuclear proliferation in the region and a much more unstable Middle East that will impact us,” he said, Politico reported. After holding a moment of silence for the Marines killed in a shooting Thursday at a recruiting center in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Mr. Bush slammed Mr. Obama for a foreign policy approach that has left the Middle East in tatters and had led to incidents of domestic terrorism like this week’s shooting. “We’re living in times that are quite perilous,” Mr. Bush said, Politico reported. “Now we see what happens when we pull back. These threats spread over the Internet all around the world including our own country. I, for one, we believe we need to reengage with the rest of the world, fight barbaric Islamic terrorism in the Middle East and also do what we need to do to protect the homeland, using all the tools available to make it so, protecting civil liberties along the way but make sure, make sure that we keep this country safe.” FBI officials have yet to confirm if the accused 24-year-old Kuwaiti-born gunman had any ties to Islamic terrorist organizations. *RUBIO* *Rubio: ‘The American people believe in immigration' <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/248423-rubio-the-american-people-believe-in-immigration> // The Hill // Keith Laing – July 18, 2015 * Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) on Saturday said he believes voters are willing to embrace immigration reform if officials find a way to stem the tide of illegal entrances into the country. "I think the American people believe in immigration and want it to work for America," the Republican presidential candidate said at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa. "I don't think we can make any progress on it until we bring illegal immigration under control," Rubio continued. "That's been the biggest lesson of last three years." Rubio pushed for an immigration reform package in 2013, prior launching his 2016 presidential bid, but he backed off amid staunch opposition from conservatives. The White House hopeful placed blame for the failed immigration reform effort on President Obama and Democrats in Congress. "I believe people are ready to be very reasonable about it [and] modernize our system," he said. "But before they do anything, they want to make sure that problem we have now of a rampant, out-of-control illegal immigration is brought under control and never happens again, and they don't believe that is and they don't trust this president to do it." Obama has moved to address immigration through executive action, arguing he had to act on his own because Congress failed to pass an immigration reform measure in his first six years in office. Rubio said blamed the congressional inaction on Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who was the majority leader until the beginning of this year. "It was frustrating for four years in the Senate, and Harry Reid chose to do nothing," he said. "And even now, we face the situation where even if we make progress, you have a president that will veto things.” “There are consequences to electing someone to the highest office of the land is who more interested in doing things by executive order than through the proper channel that our constitution gives us." Rubio also criticized Obama for striking a nuclear agreement with Iran, saying the president is pursuing the deal "because he wants a legacy. "He is dying to build exhibits for his presidential library," Rubio said of Obama, who promised to meet with hostile foreign leaders during his 2008 campaign. "This is going to be that Barack Obama opened up America to Iran, and the next president blew it," Rubio continued. "And it's absurd and our allies in the region know it's absurd." "We now live in a world were we treat the Ayatollah in Tehran with more respect than the Prime Minister of the only pro-American, free enterprise democracy in the Middle East, the state of Israel," the Florida senator said. He said the final decision on the Iran deal will come down to "whether you are able to convince 13-14 Democrats to vote against it." He said he is opposed to the nuclear agreement because "the inspection requirements in the deal are a complete sham.” "It sounds almost like an arbitration panel for a contract between two companies," Rubio added. *WALKER* *Scott Walker Is Starting His Road to the White House in a Winnebago <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/scott-walker-starting-road-white-house-winnebago/story?id=32540385> // ABC News // Jordyn Phelps – July 18, 2015 * On his first trip to Iowa as the fresh face of the Republican presidential field, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker has been putting the pedal to the metal, crisscrossing the Hawkeye State’s corn field-lined interstates in a souped-up Winnebago RV with a goal of hitting all 99 counties before voters here cast the nation’s first votes in the presidential nominating process. Since arriving in Iowa Friday -- the final stop of his whirlwind five-state, 16-city campaign kickoff tour -- it has been abundantly clear that Iowa is the key to Walker’s White House hopes. "We're pulling a full Grassley. We're doing like Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst and Terry Bandstad," Walker is telling audience after audience, referring to the state's two senators and governor, as he traverses the length and breadth of Iowa with his wife and two college-age sons. "We're going around in an RV in all 99 counties across this great state. We're having a lot of fun, it's a lot of fun for us cruising around the state in the RV." It's a tried-and-true approach for the masters of Iowa-style retail politics, and one that's not only reaped benefits for Iowa politicians but presidential hopefuls too. Rick Santorum, the winner of the state’s 2012 Republican caucuses, visited all 99 counties. And as the governor of a neighboring Midwestern state who spent his early childhood years in Iowa, the son of a small-town Baptist preacher, Walker goes heavy in emphasizing his Midwestern roots – and values -- as he makes his pitch to voters here. While campaigning this week, he has taken to pulling from his pocket a 40-year-old-photo of him and his brother, David, holding an Iowa state flag and telling the story of how as boys they raised money to buy a state flag for the Plainfield, Iowa, town hall by walking around town with a mayonnaise jar with a slit in the top, eventually collecting enough coins to purchase the flag. "That’s the kind of people we are here in the Midwest," Walker said. "We stand up for what's right, we do the right thing, we don't make a lot of fuss about it, we just do it. And I think that's what we need now more than ever in Washington." Everything from Walker's choice of transportation (he jokes he could go camping in the RV) to his footwear (Harley boots) and the contents of his pockets (that photo of him and his brother holding an Iowa state flag as children), bolster Walker’s narrative as a relatable guy who could just as easily live down the block as he could at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Walker closes his stump speech with a promise not to leave the people of Iowa behind in the rearview mirror of his Winnebago if they can deliver him a win in the 2016 caucuses. "I'm not just coming to the caucus, I'm committed here," Walker says. "You help me win this caucus and we go on and become the nominee, we will be back in Iowa to win in November of 2016, because the pathway to a Republican president comes through the Midwest." *Iowa Republicans get some satisfaction as Scott Walker rolls up like a rock star <http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/17/iowa-scott-walker-republican-presidential-candidate> // The Guardian // Ben Jacobs – July 18, 2015 * In a shortsleeved button-down shirt and with a thin veil of sweat on his upper lip, Scott Walker would never be mistaken for Mick Jagger. Yet on his first official trip to Iowa as a candidate for the presidency, the Wisconsin governor came across as a rock star in mid-tour form. In lieu of performing his greatest hits, Walker reached back to his 40-minute announcement speech from Monday – and gave some lines word for word. Surrounded by a crowd of almost 200 in a room on the upper deck of a minor-league baseball stadium in Davenport, Walker said he could bring “new and fresh leadership which gets things done”. He went on to recite the story of how he cracked down on organized labor in his home state, praising the idea of “true freedom” as he did so. “As long as you don’t violate the health and safety of your neighbor, go out and start your own business,” Walker said. He also denounced Barack Obama’s deal with Iran and, unsurprisingly, cited Ronald Reagan as his foreign policy model. Many of the attendees were familiar with Walker’s record. John Moeller of Davenport told the Guardian he had long been a small donor to the Wisconsin governor. Pat Turner of nearby Coal Valley, Illinois, said her daughter, a student at the University of Wisconsin, experiencing major budget cuts pushed by the governor, didn’t much like him. However, Turner, a former teachers union member, liked that the Wisconsin governor cracked down on tenure for public school teachers. No screaming teenage girls ran on stage – although Miss Scott County 2014 did sit behind Walker, wearing tiara and sash. The governor was approached, after his speech, by a homeless man, who embraced him. Gregory Kehl, a 60-year-old army veteran wearing a Harley-Davidson vest, asked to pray with the candidate. As they embraced, Kehl prayed for a Walker victory. He had never voted before, he said, but he would do so in this election for Walker. Kehl then asked for help finding something to eat. Walker directed him to a staff member who took him to an assortment of hamburgers and bratwursts, provided for attendees. Some more traditional Republican supporters were also impressed. Gene Lepperd of Bettendorf talked to the Guardian while munching on a bratwurst with onions and ketchup. Lepperd, who was wearing an Iowa State University polo shirt, said he thought Walker was No 1 in the 15-strong Republican field. Asked why, he cited Walker’s record as governor. A lot of politicians will give “these flowery speeches”, Lepperd said, but he thought the governor was “one of the few who had walked the walk” with his conservatism in office in Wisconsin. The Davenport event was Walker’s first stop in Iowa as an official candidate – he has announced his intent to visit all 99 counties in the course of the primary campaign. He was scheduled to crisscross the Hawkeye State through Sunday. *Scott Walker promises forceful foreign policy in Sioux City stop <http://siouxcityjournal.com/news/local/a1/scott-walker-promises-forceful-foreign-policy-in-sioux-city-stop/article_7ec73f02-0a40-5244-8fb2-464abce0dfb1.html> // Sioux City Journal // Bret Hayworth – July 18, 2015 * Pointing to his experience as Wisconsin's chief executive, Gov. Scott Walker on Saturday vowed he would establish the toughest foreign policy since Ronald Reagan if he wins the presidency in 2016. Walker, a Republican, told a crowd of 200 in Sioux City that he would steer the nation away from Democratic President Barack Obama's failed, inadequate defense of longtime ally Israel and ensure that sanctions remain on Iran, a nation that is suspected of wanting to develop nuclear weapons. A 60-day period for Congress to review Obama's deal to lift sanctions on Iran is underway. "Iran is not a place we should being doing business with," Walker said. Walker spoke for 20 minutes outside a Republican Party office downtown on a sunny day. He didn't take questions from the crowd. He came through the city as part of a six-state, 16-city swing after launching his campaign Monday in Wisconsin. He plans to visit 10 Iowa counties through Sunday, traveling in a Winnebago motor home. Walker noted that he lived as a young boy in Plainfield, Iowa, in the 1970s before his minister father moved the family to Wisconsin. He peppered his remarks with statements about living in Iowa, Big 10 Conference sports and shopping for bargains at Kohl's. When he turned to policies, Walker said he would boost the economy by reducing harmful federal regulations on business, decreasing tax rates and ensuring that all types of energy be used nationally. "I am for building a better economy, where everyone can be lifted up and get their piece of the American Dream. And I am for protecting your children and grandchildren from the threats of radical Islamic terrorism and other threats like that in the world," Walker said. As for his Wisconsin accomplishments, Walker pointed to education reform, lowering property taxes and reducing benefits to state employee union members in 2011. Walker said in becoming the first Republican governor in Wisconsin since 1984 he has demonstrated the mettle needed to win a bruising presidential election next year. "I am going to come back and play to win in Iowa," Walker said of the state that is among roughly 10 battleground states that could decide the presidency. Walker has led the broad Republican field in Iowa polls for many months, even though he wasn't officially a candidate until this week. Walker's visit closed out a notable week of Republican candidates making their first visit to Sioux City. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush spoke Monday, and U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio had a campaign stop on Friday. They drew crowds ranging in size from 140 (Rubio) to 240 (Bush). Sandy Sievers, of Sioux City, said Walker is among her current five top choices for president. She also likes former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Rubio, and U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz, of Texas, and Lindsay Graham, of South Carolina. "I am checking Walker out thoroughly," Sievers said. "He is with my philosophy on foreign affairs. We do need to support Israel. We have kind of left them to sink or swim." Jim Lewis, of Sioux City, has Walker and Perry in his top tier of candidates. Lewis said the fact that Walker prevailed after an election to remove, or recall, him from the governor position is impressive. "He is coming from a blue (Democratic-leaning) state. He won the election on the recall even more than he won the first time. To me, that shows he is doing the right thing," Lewis said. *PAUL* *Report: Rand Paul calls for scrutiny of Muslims <http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/07/18/paul-muslim-immigration/30342457/> // USA Today // Bill Theobald – July 18, 2015 * Breitbart News is reporting that GOP presidential candidate Rand Paul told one of its reporters backstage at a speech in Houston last night that the U.S. should provide extra scrutiny of people coming into the country from predominantly Muslim countries after the Chattanooga, Tenn., terrorist attack on Friday. "I’m very concerned about immigration to this country from countries that have hotbeds of jihadism and hotbeds of this Islamism," Paul told Breitbart. "I think there does need to be heightened scrutiny. Nobody has a right to come to America, so this isn’t something that we can say ‘oh, their rights are being violated.’ It’s a privilege to come to America and we need to thoroughly screen those who are coming." The alleged shooter in the Chattanooga incident -- which claimed the lives of five U.S. Marines -- was named Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez. The 24-year-old was born in Kuwait and immigrated to the U.S. Paul also cited an incident in his hometown of Bowling Green, Ky., where two Iraqi refugees who were placed in Kentucky tried to buy military grade missiles. "I think we’re doing the wrong thing by just having this open door policy to bring in people without significant scrutiny. I’m for increasing scrutiny on people who come on student visas from the 25 countries that have significant jihadism. Also, any kind of permanent visas or green cards, we need to be very careful. I don’t think we’re being careful enough with who we let in," he said. Paul, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said he would ask that senators to look at reinstating the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System program. Started in 2002 after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the DHS system recorded the arrival, stay and departure of people from countries chosen based on an analysis of possible national security threats. Registrants were also required to register when they left. The program was effectively eliminated in 2011. *Ron Paul Not Listed As Donor To Rand Paul’s Presidential Campaign <http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/18/ron-paul-not-listed-as-donor-to-rand-pauls-presidential-campaign/> // Daily Caller // Jamie Weinstein – July 18, 2015 * Rand Paul’s father Ron does not appear to be among the over 100,000 donors so far to his son’s presidential campaign. According to the younger Paul’s recent Federal Election Commission filing, the elder Paul, a former Texas congressman who himself ran for president three times, has yet to donate to his son’s 2016 presidential campaign — at least not more than the $200 threshold where his donation would be required to report. Rand’s mother, Carol, does not appear to have donated her son’s campaign yet either. In contrast, the other Republican presidential contender with a storied political family, Jeb Bush, has received the maximum allowable donation of $2,700 from both his father, former President George H.W. Bush, and his mother, former first lady Barbara Bush. A host of Bush siblings and in-laws, including former President George W. Bush and former first lady Laura Bush, have also donated $2,700 to Jeb’s campaign to win the Republican presidential nomination. An email to Paul’s campaign spokesman by The Daily Caller Thursday requesting comment went unreturned. Between April when Paul officially entered the presidential field and June 30, Paul has raised nearly $7 million, according to numbers filed earlier this week with the FEC. That number places him ahead of Republican contenders like Carly Fiorina and Rick Perry, but behind Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Ben Carson and Ted Cruz. Paul’s mother Carol did donate $2,000 to her son’s Senate race in 2010. *CRUZ* *Cruz: Planned Parenthood leaders should be prosecuted <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/248432-cruz-planned-parenthood-should-be-prosecuted> // The Hill // Keith Laing – July 18, 2015 * Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Saturday said the leaders of Planned Parenthood should be prosecuted after the release of a video this week showing an executive discussing the donation of fetal organs. "Every American should watch that video and say, ‘Are those my values?’ ” the 2016 presidential candidate said at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa. "On tape, it appears a Planned Parenthood official is admitting to multiple felonies," he continued. "The U.S. Department of Justice, if it was not simply a partisan arm of the DNC, should open an investigation and prosecute Planned Parenthood. Congress should hold hearings and we should cut off funds." Planned Parenthood's senior director of medical services, Dr. Deborah Nucatola, was filmed discussing the demand for fetal organs such as livers, lungs and “intact” hearts. The video has been viewed more than 1.5 million times since it was released Tuesday. Republicans have threatened to cut of the group's federal funding since the release of the video, but Democrats have sought to protect the payments. Paul said he also took issue with a recent Supreme Court decision to legalize same-sex marriage, which he said was "lawless and it was sad." "It's naked judicial activism," he said. *Ted Cruz On Iran Deal: There Will Be Blood <http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/07/18/ted-cruz-on-iran-deal-there-will-be-blood/> // Breitbart – July 18, 2015 * In case there was any doubt, which there probably wasn’t, Sen. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is not a fan of the Iran deal that President Barack Obama announced on Tuesday. Indeed, he told CQ Roll Call Tuesday it will fund murder. If the deal goes into effect, it “will result in the United States government becoming one of the leading funders of international terrorism,” and that “those American dollars will be used to murder Americans, to murder Israelis, to murder Europeans.” The Texas Republican said a sensible commander in chief would demand that Iran disassemble all centrifuges, forfeit its enriched uranium, shut down its intercontinental ballistic missile program — which is solely to “carry a nuclear weapon to the U.S.” — and stop being the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. Cruz called Obama’s speech announcing the deal “particularly shameful” for not mentioning Americans imprisoned in Iran — specifically Pastor Saeed Abedini, Marine veteran Amir Hekmati and journalist Jason Rezaian. “To see the president not even mention Americans wallowing in Iranian prisons for having the temerity to profess their faith, for having the temerity to exercise their First Amendment rights, I cannot imagine the heartbreak and betrayal that [their] families must be feeling and that every American should be feeling at a president who doesn’t stand up and defend Americans,” Cruz said. Cruz, of course, isn’t the only 2016 aspirant to oppose the Iran deal. The party’s candidates appear united in opposition. *Ted Cruz says he won't 'go into the gutter' to criticize Donald Trump <http://www.businessinsider.com/ted-cruz-says-he-wont-go-into-the-gutter-to-criticize-donald-trump-2015-7#ixzz3gJFjpSYy> // Business Insider // Bryan Logan – July 18, 2015 * Criticism of real estate mogul-turned-presidential candidate Donald Trump has been swift and boisterous of late, thanks to Trump's fiery statements labeling some Mexican immigrants as "rapists" and drug-runners. Trump's latest target is Arizona Senator John McCain (R), a decorated veteran who was a prisoner of war in Vietnam. After the billionaire businessman trampled McCain's service record Saturday, saying "He's not a war hero," and mocked McCain's time in captivity, the ensuing backlash was quick and sharp. Current GOP presidential candidates and the Republican Party at large have summarily condemned Trump's attack, except for one candidate, Ted Cruz. In a Bloomberg interview Saturday, Cruz said "I'm not going to go into the gutter with personal attacks" Cruz hearkened back to his days in the Senate where he says "I haven't impugned the character of Republicans or Democrats and I don't intend to start today," Bloomberg reports. Trump has doubled down on his unfiltered political rhetoric despite criticism coming from all sides, including Republican National Committee chairman, Reince Priebus. News Corporation founder, Rupert Murdoch, tweeted Saturday that Trump is "embarrassing the country." For better or worse, Trump has not been shy about challenging anyone who opposes him — engaging critics on social media and in public. In the few weeks since Trump launched his 2016 presidential campaign, Ted Cruz, who is also vying for the GOP nomination, has made a concerted effort to stay out of Trump's way. Even as the repudiation of Donald Trump's views on immigration exploded, Cruz — who is of Cuban ancestry — backed away, even saying he "salutes" Trump for "focusing on the need to address illegal immigration." *PERRY* *Rick Perry redoubles attack on Donald Trump for John McCain remarks <http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/18/rick-perry-donald-trump-john-mccain> // The Guardian // Ben Jacobs – July 18, 2015 * Former Texas governor Rick Perry doubled down on his condemnation of Donald Trump’s attack on John McCain, demanding an immediate apology. Trump, however, said only that McCain was “yet another all talk, no action politician who spends too much time on television”. Hours after Trump said McCain was “not a war hero” on stage at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Perry went on the same stage and tore into Trump for his remarks. McCain’s plane was shot down over North Vietnam in 1967 and he spent five and a half years in captivity, subject to repeated torture. Perry said: “I was highly offended about what Donald Trump said about [McCain’s] years of sacrifice in a dirty, dingy, terrible prison in North Vietnam. Donald Trump owes every American veteran and, in particular, John McCain an apology.” In response to a follow-up question from moderator Frank Luntz, the former Texas governor said that if Trump did not apologize it would disqualify him from being a legitimate candidate as well as commander in chief. Perry’s comments received polite applause from the audience of thousands of Iowa social conservatives. In a statement on Saturday afternoon, Trump tried to pivot on his comments about McCain and distance himself from criticism of the Arizona senator’s service. Trump said: “I am not a fan [of] John McCain because he has done so little for our veterans and he should know better than anybody what the veterans need, especially in regards to the VA [Veterans Affairs department]. “He is yet another all talk, no action politician who spends too much time on television and not enough time doing his job and helping the vets.” Earlier on Saturday, Perry’s campaign had issued a statement stating Trump’s comments represented “ a new low in American politics” and urging the former Celebrity Apprentice host to “immediately withdraw from the race for president”. In recent days, Perry has engaged war of words with Trump. The former Texas governor has condemned Trump’s comments on immigration and said the billionaire’s ideology was “a toxic mix of demagoguery and nonsense”. In return, Trump tweeted that Perry “should be forced to take an IQ test before being allowed to enter the GOP debate”. Perry is running for president for a second time, after his 2012 campaign was torpedoed by a debate gaffe, in which he forgot the name of a third government department he was proposing to abolish. *Perry calls on Trump to end his campaign: ‘His comments have reached a new low’ <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/18/rick-perry-calls-donald-trump-end-his-presidential/> // Washington Times // Seth McLaughlin – July 18, 2015 * Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry is calling on Donald Trump to bow out of the 2016 GOP presidential race, after the New York real estate mogul ridiculed Sen. John McCain’s military service. Mr. Perry and Mr. Trump have been engaged in a back-and-forth that escalated Saturday when Mr. Trump dismissed the idea that Mr. McCain is a war hero for getting shot down over Vietnam and being imprisoned for nearly six years. Mr. Perry called on Mr. Trump to apologize and end his bid for the White House, and the Republican National Committee said that there is “no place in our party” for Mr. Trump’s comments. “As a veteran and an American, I respect Sen. McCain because he volunteered to serve his country. I cannot say the same of Mr. Trump. His comments have reached a new low in American politics,” Mr. Perry said. “His attack on veterans make him unfit to be Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, and he should immediately withdraw from the race for President.” Mr. Trump and Mr. Perry have been trading barbs for several days. Mr. Trump said Mr. Perry failed to secure the Texas-Mexico border as governor and said Mr. Perry should be “forced to take an IQ test before being allowed to enter the GOP debate.” Mr. Trump also had took aim this week at Mr. McCain, the party’s 2008 presidential nominee, calling him a “dummy” after the Arizona Senator said that Mr. Trump’s controversial remarks on immigration have fired “up the crazies” in the Republican party. The feud spilled into the Family Leadership Summit in Iowa on Saturday when Mr. Trump mocked Mr. McCain’s war hero status. “He’s not a war hero. He was a war hero because he was captured,” Mr. Trump said, sarcastically. “I like people who weren’t captured.” Then he added, “He’s a war hero because he was captured. OK, I believe — perhaps he’s a war hero.” Mr. Trump’s GOP presidential came to Mr. McCain’s defense. “If there was ever any doubt that @realDonaldTrump should not be our commander in chief, this stupid statement should end all doubt,” Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said. “Enough with the slanderous attacks,” said former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. “@SenJohnMcCain and all our veterans - particularly POWs have earned our respect and admiration.” Sean Spicer, RNC spokesperson, said Mr. McCain is “an American hero because he served his country and sacrificed more than most can imagine. Period.” “There is no place in our party or our country for comments that disparage those who have served honorably,” Mr. Spicer said. Despite the blow back, Mr. Trump signaled he plans on sticking around the nomination race, blasting out a news release in which he leveled additional criticism at Mr. McCain. “He is yet another all talk, no action politician who spends too much time on television and not enough time doing his job and helping the Vets,” Mr. Trump said. “He is also allowing our military to decrease substantially in size and strength, something which should never be allowed to happen.” “I have great respect for all those who serve in our military including those that weren’t captured and are also heroes,” he added. “I want to strengthen our military and take care of our Veterans. I want to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN especially for those that serve to protect our freedom. I am fighting for our Veterans!” *Rick Perry: Trump Is Unfit to Lead the Military, ‘Should Immediately Withdraw’ from Race <http://www.mediaite.com/online/rick-perry-trump-is-unfit-to-lead-the-military-should-immediately-withdraw-from-race/> // MediaIte // Josh Feldman – July 18, 2015 * Lots of Donald Trump‘s Republican presidential candidates have already shredded him for his comments about John McCain, but Rick Perry came out swinging by calling for Trump to basically GTFO. In case you missed it, the draft-defering Trump attacked McCain today over his war hero status because, “He’s a war hero ’cause he was captured. I like people that weren’t captured.” Now, for some unbelievable reason, lots of conservatives including the aforementioned candidates thought Trump crossed a line. Perry was the first to release a statement on The Donald’s latest rambling, this one really going for the jugular (emphasis his): Donald Trump should apologize immediately for attacking Senator McCain and all veterans who have protected and served our country. As a veteran and an American, I respect Sen. McCain because he volunteered to serve his country. I cannot say the same of Mr. Trump. His comments have reached a new low in American politics. His attack on veterans make him unfit to be Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, and he should immediately withdraw from the race for President. For the record, when Trump was asked if he plans to apologize, he said no. *Rick Perry calls on Donald Trump to withdraw from the presidential race <http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-mccain-rick-perry-jeb-bush-2015-7#ixzz3gJ4BmNFA> // Business Insider // Maxwell Tani – July 18, 2015 * Real-estate magnate Donald Trump's latest comments were a bridge too far for many top Republican presidential rivals. And at least one candidate wants him out of the race. Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) said Trump should be disqualified from running for president. "His attack on veterans make him unfit to be Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed Forces, and he should immediately withdraw from the race for President," Perry said in a statement. At an event in Iowa on Saturday, Trump raised eyebrows for criticizing Sen. John McCain's (R-Arizona) military service and status as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. "He's a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren't captured," Trump said. Trump's comments sparked immediate condemnation from the Republican presidential field. Perry was the first to explicitly call for him to withdraw from the race. "I respect Sen. McCain because he volunteered to serve his country," Perry said in a statement. "I cannot say the same of Mr. Trump. His comments have reached a new low in American politics." GOP candidate and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), McCain's long-time friend, also said Trump's comments were "disqualifying." Other Republican hopefuls, including former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R), Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R), and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R), condemned Trump's remarks. Trump was quick to slightly tone down his comments about McCain, though he did not apologize. "He is yet another all talk, no action politician who spends too much time on television and not enough time doing his job and helping the [veterans]," Trump said in a statement. "He is also allowing our military to decrease substantially in size and strength, something which should never be allowed to happen." As it has done when defending controversial comments in the past, Trump's campaign cited the excitement in the crowd as proof that his message resonated with the crowd. "Note, Mr. Trump left to a long lasting standing ovation, which will be by far the biggest ovation of the weekend, and much congratulatory praise," a statement from the Trump campaign said. Trump's comments come after McCain criticized the real estate mogul earlier this month for bringing out "the crazies" in the Republican base. Perry — a former cargo-plane pilot in the Air Force — made military service a major part of his presidential campaign. In his announcement speech last month, the former governor was joined onstage with several veterans and the wife of sharpshooter Chris Kyle, made famous by the semi-biographical film American Sniper. *GRAHAM* *'I feel like I'm on Oprah': Lindsey Graham tears up in Iowa as he explains how the government helped him survive his parents' early death <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3166772/I-feel-like-m-Oprah-Lindsey-Graham-tears-Iowa-explains-government-helped-survive-parents-early-death.html#ixzz3gJHNxXep> // Daily Mail // David Martosko – July 18, 2015 * South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham fought back tears on Saturday during a religious Republican gathering, recalling his late mother and father, and imagining how he would talk to them if he could. Graham was left with a 13-year-old sister to raise at age 21 when his parents both died within a year's time, and he said he wished they knew 'that Darline turned out really good.' And risking the wrath of more than 1,000 red-meat conservatives gathered in Ames, Iowa, he insisted that he and his younger sibling wouldn't have survived the crisis of their lives without robust government benefits. 'I'm a proud Republican but there's a time and a place for the government,' he said. 'I've been on my knees and some people helped me get up.' 'I'm glad I had college loans for my sister,' he said. 'I'm glad Social Security is there. If I got to be president of the United States I'd make sure we did the right thing and the hard thing, because the country needs a leader and Barack Obama has been a miserable failure as president.' Asked by moderator Frank Luntz at the Family Leadership Summit to say what he would say to his parents, Graham paused while tears welled in his eyes. He said, whisper-like, that he would say 'that Darline turned out really good.' 'And I've tried hard. And thanks to you, I've come a long way.' Over generous applause at one of the day's most genuine human moments, Graham told the crowd: 'Love is not the size of the house, but what happens inside the house. I was well loved.' 'To all those kids who were not well loved, I feel so sorry for you,' he preached. 'This is a Family Leadership council. We're all one car wreck away from needing somebody's help.' As the ovation subsided, Graham turned and smiled. 'I feel like I'm on Oprah,' he said. 'I'm sorry.' 'What does that make me?' Luntz asked. Graham's focus on the value of taxpayer-funded benefits was a stark contrast to other GOP presidential candidates who spent their alloted time on stage describing which federal programs – and entire cabinet departments – they would ban from Washington. The Internal Revenue Service, the Education and Energy Departments and the section of Health and Human Services that administers Obamacare programs were popular targets. And while neither Republicans nor Democrats are fond of bashing entitlements like Social Security, there's scant agreement on how to keep the programs functioning as benefit payouts dramatically outpace taxpayer contributions. The Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees reported in 2014 that the two programs' long-term unfunded obligations – money the government will need to distribute but has no plan to collect in taxes – has reached nearly $49 trillion. That figure continues to grow and is approaching triple the size of America's official public debt. Republican reformers have been loath to risk the wrath of elderly voters and those approaching retirement, tiptoeing around the idea of changing how benefits are allocated. Think-tanks periodically propose raising the retirement age as Americans' life-expectancy grows, in order to keep Social Security solvent, or 'means-testing' Social Security by denying benefits to people who already have confortable retirement incomes of their own. I'm a proud Republican but there's a time and a place for the government. I've been on my knees and some people helped me get up. I'm glad I had college loans for my sister. I'm glad Social Security is there. Sen. Lindsey Graham, reflecting on how the GOP needs to be willing to compromise in order to keep entitlement programs solvent Democrats typically pan such proposals as mean-spirited and cruel, especially as biennial federal elections draw near. But Graham, a centrist on immigration reform, said Saturday that his own experience with the Social Security program would drive him to reach across the political aisle as president and get something done. 'When I was 21 my mom died,' he said. 'A year later my dad died. I'm 22. My sister's 13.' 'My mom had Hodgkins Disease,' he recalled wistfully. 'We got totally wiped out because we were underinsured. So I don't need a lecture from Democrats about health care.' 'We got Social Security survivor benefits to help our family since my sister was a minor.' Graham pointed to his own situation as an aging bachelor, and hinted that he was a stand-in for other Americans who could afford to bend on their retirement expectations. 'I'm 60, I'm not married, I don't have any children,' he said. 'What would I do to save Social Security for people who need it more than I do? Almost anything.' 'I would give up some of my benefits to save it for those who needed it more. I'd work with a Democrat to save Medicare and Social Security. Because if we don't, we're all going down together.' Graham told the story of Republican President Ronald Reagan and Democratic House Speaker Thomas 'Tip' O'Neill collaborating in 1983 to avoid a Social Security default by raising the retirement age. While both men's partisan backers grumbled, the pair took a public victory lap and became genuine friends. That result, surprising for Washington, emerged after Reagan formed a White House commission on saving Social Security and invited O'Neill and the Democrats to share its seats. In contrast President Barack Obama, said Graham, 'has done nothing but talk.' A similar commision, named after co-chairs Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles, a former Republican Senator and Clinton Chief of Staff, delivered recommendations on the long-term solvency of the U.S. treasury that the White House has largely ignored. 'He had a chance to do something about our national debt – Simpson-Bowles,' Graham complained on Saturday. 'He threw it in the trash can.' *SANTORUM* *Rick Santorum wants curbs on legal immigration in effort to help boost wages in US <http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2015/07/18/floridas-rubio-hes-experienced-on-21st-century-issues> // AP – July 18, 2015 * Several Republicans presidential candidates are vowing to stop illegal immigration. But Rick Santorum says the U.S. needs to curtail legal immigration as well. The former Pennsylvania senator says the vast majority of immigrants coming into the U.S. — legally and illegally — are driving down wages for American-born workers. Santorum tells Iowa evangelical voters on Saturday that "we need to hold the line and stop illegal immigration" while reducing legal immigration of unskilled workers by 25 percent. He says that will help bring up wages in the U.S. Santorum is among 10 presidential candidates courting religious conservatives in Iowa. He won the state's caucuses in 2012, but faces strong competition for the evangelical vote in 2016. *HUCKABEE* *Huckabee Responds to Trump: ‘John McCain is a hero’ <http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2015/07/18/huckabee-responds-to-trump-john-mccain-is-a-hero/> // Alex Swoyer – July 18, 2015 * GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee distanced himself from fellow candidate Donald Trump’s statements about Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)43% on Saturday. “I said very clearly Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is a hero — Donald Trump will need to determine whether that’s a statement he needs to walk back,” Huckabee told a news conference, saying that he continues to speak only for himself. Reporters also questioned Huckabee about Trump’s popularity, since the real estate mogul has rocketed to number one in recent polls. “I’m having a hard time understanding why I don’t have 97 percent in the polls right now,” Huckabee quipped, saying he’ll focus on his campaign and not on Trump. Huckabee added that the polls will continue to fluctuate. “You guys are giving him so much attention — give me a little bit of the love,” Huckabee joked to the press. The crowd at the Family Leadership Summit certainly did. Huckabee got four standing ovations — the most for any candidate so far. *CARSON* *Carson: Black voters 'waking up' to GOP <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/248427-carson-black-voters-waking-up-to-gop> // The Hill // Keith Laing – July 18, 2015 * Ben Carson on Saturday said African-American voters are "waking up" to the possibility of supporting GOP candidates for office like himself. "I think there's a lot of people who are waking up," the neurosurgeon-turned-presidential candidate said at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa. "I met with a group of black pastors yesterday and people are waking up in droves," he continued. "I think they're realizing what's been happening here." Carson said he converted to the Republican Party after growing up and going to school in Democratic strongholds during the Reagan administration. "I started listening to Ronald Reagan … and I said he doesn't doesn't sound like that," he said, noting he had heard horror stories about conservatives during his entire upbringing. Carson criticized President Obama for shrinking the size of the U.S. military in the face of terrorism threats in the Middle East. "Our military is shrinking while our enemies are growing and metastasizing," he said. "It seems like we're trying to destroy ourselves. We've got to do better than that." The Republican presidential hopeful said he would prepared to fight Islamic State in Syria and Iraq if successful in his bid to become commander-in-chief. "We have radical Islamic jihadists who want to destroy us and they want to destroy our way of life," he said. "And their existence is a threat to us. We cannot be in that mindset that we made a mistake and we spent a bunch of money, so let's just get into our little cocoon. That's not going to work." *Dr. Ben Carson on ‘Trump’s McCain Statement: ‘We Need to Hear from Everybody’ <http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/18/dr-ben-carson-on-trumps-mccain-statement-we-need-to-hear-from-everybody/> // Breitbart News // Alex Swoyer – July 18, 2015 * In a press conference following GOP candidate Dr. Ben Carson’s speech at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa, Carson was asked what he thought about Trump’s comments on illegal immigration and recent statement on Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) as a war hero, which Trump made during his own speech at the Summit. “I think everybody has their niche – everybody has their voice,” Carson answered. “I think we need to hear from everybody. And that’s the beauty of the process we have.” A reporter asked Carson what niche Trump has in the GOP presidential race. “I think that’s a decision that will be made by the people,” Carson answered. Carson continued to say the people will decide who’s voice they favor: “Not the media, not the pundits, but the people – all we have to do is make sure we allow voices to be heard.” Carson said he believes Sen. McCain has done some wonderful things when questioned if he considers McCain a war hero. *JINDAL* *Jindal focuses on his religion in Indianola <http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/07/18/bobby-jindal-indianola/30359755/> // The Des Moines Register // Paige Godden – July 18, 2015 * Hours before Bobby Jindal met hundreds of media and fans Saturday at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, he sat down with a much more intimate crowd 50 miles south in Indianola. About 60 people gathered to see the Louisiana governor and White House hopeful at the First Assembly of God Church. Jindal started his hour-long remarks by pointing out that the sleeping baby his wife Supriya Jolly was holding wasn't theirs. "Before we start any rumors, that is not our baby," Jindal said. "That'd be news to my parents and a lot of other folks back home." The Jindals have three children of their own: Slade, Selia and Shaan. The youngest of which, Bobby said, was accidentally born at home. His wife was in labor for more than 24 hours with the first two children, he said, but the third came in 30 minutes. "I'll tell you this," Jindal told the crowd. "Any man who thinks they're tough, there's a reason the Lord God almighty decided women — not men — should have babies. If men had babies, there would be one and we'd get together and say 'never again.' " The Republican focused a good portion of his speech on his religious beliefs. He said as commander in chief he'd hunt down and kill radical Islamic terrorists and make sure to condemn the "evil individuals who are going straight to hell, where they belong." Jindal later said Christians are the ones who are being persecuted in America. His remarks on terrorism began with blasting President Barack Obama, who at the Pentagon earlier this week said the country can't win the war on terror with guns. "You know, I'm glad generals Eisenhower and Patton didn't take that idea in World War II," Jindal said. "Can you imagine if a previous generation said we're going to win, we're going to beat evil with propaganda? The French would be speaking German today." He said instead of having a president who is busy apologizing for and criticizing America and wants to protect Americans from microwave popcorn, Oreos and junk food, citizens should want a president who will actually say the words "radical Islamic terrorism." "How can we beat an enemy if we're not willing to name it, identify it and confront it?" Jindal asked. "I don't want a commander in chief who says we're going to contain them. I want a commander in chief who says we're going to hunt them down and kill them." He said as president, he'd tell Muslim leaders they have to explicitly embrace the same freedoms for people of different religious beliefs as they want for themselves. Jindal said his own statements are harsh, and he'll be judged for being anti-Muslim or racist, but he said it's just common sense to say he'd confront radical Islamic terrorism. Later, he called out Hillary Clinton, who said Jindal was too extreme for saying he wants to get rid of the Supreme Court justices after they legalized gay marriage. Maybe, he said, he really only wants two-thirds of the justices gone. "We need Republicans who are willing to fight for our principles," Jindal said. "I'm for federal efforts to give us our Tenth Amendment back to define marriage as being between a man and a woman, but we also need to fight for our First Amendment rights." He said the left is trying to take away the First Amendment right of freedom of religious expression. "Several weeks ago, Hillary Clinton said those of us who are pro-life need to have our religious beliefs changed," Jindal said. "My religious beliefs are between me and God almighty. I'm not changing because Hillary Clinton doesn't like it, or the New York Times doesn't like it. But make no mistake, the left are now trying to silence us." In Louisiana, Jindal said, he wrote an executive order in May protecting the rights of individuals and businesses that says no one can sanction or discriminate against those who have a traditional view of marriage. His reward, he said, was a lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union. "They used Louisiana's own Religious Freedom and Restoration Act to defend the rights of religious minorities, and I'm glad they did," Jindal said. "But now that Christians are the ones being persecuted and discriminated against, now the ACLU is showing its hypocrisy. They don't want anything to do with the rights of Christians. "I want to say this very slowly and simply so even Hillary Clinton can understand it," Jindal said. "The United States of America did not create religions liberty. Religious liberty created the United States of America." Jindal also talked about Israel and Iran, stating every time Israel gets attacked, the president talks in moral equivalents. The president, he said, believes both sides should make concessions even though only one side is using suicide bombers to attack civilians. Instead of putting pressure on Israel, Jindal said, the country needs to figure out how to reject violence and believe in itself. "If they want negotiations, it's up to them to reject violence, to reject terrorism, to recognize the right for Israel's right to exist," Jindal said. He questioned how Obama can be making deals with Iran when he can't even acknowledge Israel exists. "We need to make it clear Israel is our most important ally in the Middle East," Jindal said. "Secondly, I will not recognize a bad deal negotiated by this president." Jindal received a lot of applause with his stance on immigration, including a story on how his parents achieved the American dream. "When they came, they came legally," he said to a clapping audience. He received even louder applause when he said: "If folks want to come to our country, they should come legally, they should learn English, they should adopt our values and they should roll up their sleeves and get to work when they get here." Jindal later said he'd try to protect the border, but he wouldn't do that with a 1,000-page immigration bill. The only thing that would be good for, he said, is if someone decided to stack the pages up along the border. *TRUMP* *The Trump Campaign’s Turning Point <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/21/upshot/the-trump-campaigns-turning-point.html?abt=0002&abg=1> // NYT // Nate Cohn – July 18, 2015 * Donald Trump’s surge in the polls has followed the classic pattern of a media-driven surge. Now it will likely follow the classic pattern of a party-backed decline. Mr. Trump’s candidacy probably reached an inflection point on Saturday after he essentially criticized John McCain for being captured during the Vietnam War. Republican campaigns and elites quickly moved to condemn his comments — a shift that will probably mark the moment when Trump’s candidacy went from boom to bust. His support will erode as the tone of coverage shifts from publicizing his anti-establishment and anti-immigration views, which have some resonance in the party, to reflecting the chorus of Republican criticism of his most outrageous comments and the more liberal elements of his record. His surge in the presidential polls began on June 16 when he declared his candidacy. Announcements of that type always yield a wave of media coverage, just as they did for candidates like Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio. So far this year, media attention from announcements has helped the best-known candidates by an average of six percentage points, with the effect degrading steadily afterward. But Mr. Trump has not received an ordinary amount of media attention, and he has not received an ordinary bounce. He has been perfecting the art of attracting media attention for more than two decades, first in New York and then nationwide. Today, he is a celebrity, the biggest and best-known personality in the race, someone who would attract an unusual amount of attention and interest even if he said nothing unusual or interesting. Mr. Trump, of course, made unusual and provocative comments from the start, saying in his announcement speech that Mexican “rapists” were entering the United States. The amount of news media coverage of Mr. Trump dwarfed the attention received by other candidates. His post-announcement bounce has dwarfed other candidates’ surges as well. In taking the lead in some polls, he has justified another wave of media coverage and attention that continues to the article you’re reading right now. It is tempting to attribute Mr. Trump’s surge to something more than media coverage, to assume that his positions must have unusual resonance with Republican voters, or to infer that Republicans are clamoring for an anti-immigration candidate. Those factors do play a role, but the predominant force is extraordinary and sustained media coverage. Donald Trump’s support kept climbing, even after his initial post-announcement boost. The average includes Donald Trump and all candidates who received at least 4 percent in polls before their announcement: Jeb Bush, Scott Walker, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mike Huckabee and Ben Carson. The polling is consistent with the media-driven explanation as well. His support does not follow ideological lines, as Harry Enten of FiveThirtyEight has observed. It is not even clear that he has more support among immigration hard-liners than other Republicans. A Politico article titled “The Mystery of the Trump Coalition” struggled to identify which issues or demographics drove support for Mr. Trump. There might not be any. Media-driven bumps occur all the time. Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Herman Cain all rode bits of good news to a lead in national polls in 2011. They even occur in general elections, like after a party convention, when voter preferences are far firmer than they are in a 17-way primary. Google Trends data indicates that the interest in Mr. Trump rivals or even exceeds the interest in Mitt Romney after the Republican National Convention and presidential debates in 2012. But media-driven surges are not sustainable. Eventually, the media coverage shifts from whatever initially propelled the bounce — an announcement, a strong debate performance, a convention — toward a more serious examination of the candidate newly at the top of the polls. Some candidates can withstand this scrutiny. Most do not. Google search interest in Donald Trump has been about the same as Mitt Romney’s during September and October of 2012, before the general election. Lynn Vavreck, who contributes to The Upshot, and her fellow political scientist John Sides described the cycle of boom-bust candidacies as “discovery, scrutiny and decline” in their book “The Gamble.” Mr. Trump, who already enjoys high name recognition, may not present a typical case of “discovery,” but it’s highly unlikely he’ll avoid decline after encountering scrutiny. Even a cursory look at Mr. Trump’s political record revealed a candidate with serious liabilities once journalists and campaigns started taking him seriously. He has donated more to Democrats than Republicans over the last decade. He has even donated to Hillary Clinton, who he has said he likes, and the Clinton Foundation. He has supported universal health care and seems to continue to do so. He has supported a $5 trillion dollar tax increase and has said he is “very pro choice,” although he has since changed his position on abortion. He is self-evidently unelectable in a general election, combining terrible poll numbers with an unpresidential persona. Conservative candidates and their supporters view him as a rival. They have every incentive to publicize those of his views that the G.O.P. considers heretical. More moderate and establishment-friendly Republicans oppose his statements and views on immigration. They fear that his tone will alienate Hispanic voters, who are considered essential to the party’s general election chances now and in the future. Mr. Trump’s supporters will start taking cues from the uniform opinion of their fellow partisans. Until today, the big question about Mr. Trump was when coverage would shift toward a serious examination of him. Journalists and campaigns have, understandably, been reluctant to treat him as a serious candidate. The Huffington Post, for instance, decided it would cover him in the entertainment section. But eventually, campaigns were bound to treat him as a threat to be neutralized, and journalists would decide he was a candidate who needed to be covered. Today, Mr. Trump brought the shift upon himself. His comments were nothing less than an invitation for the rest of the Republican Party to begin their long-awaited offensive. So far, the Republican National Committee, Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal, Jeb Bush and Scott Walker have already criticized him for his comments. After today, Republican commentators and campaigns will have far fewer reservations about attacking Mr. Trump. They will be dismissive of his candidacy, and they will probably diversify their attacks, expanding the onslaught to include his record of donating to Democrats and his continuing support for universal health care. Nearly all of the campaigns have incentives to pile on, and Mr. Trump — without a deep base of support and with few party allies — will struggle to hold on. He will probably try to stoke support and coverage with more attention-grabbing remarks, though my hunch is that his act will have lost its novelty by the time the attacks begin to take their toll. Voters will be looking for more from him than the bombastic campaign he has offered so far. They will be looking for a serious presidential candidate, and they won’t find one. *Donald Trump disparaged John McCain’s military service. Is this the end of his run? <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/07/18/donald-trump-disparages-john-mccains-military-service-did-he-finally-go-too-far/> // WaPo // Philip Bump – July 18, 2015 * At Saturday's Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa, Donald Trump may, at last, have crossed a line with Republican voters from which he can't walk back. Arizona Sen. John McCain earlier this week harshly criticized the businessman in a conversation with the New Yorker, lamenting Trump's comments about Mexican immigrants. Having already responded on Twitter by calling McCain a "dummy," Trump upped the ante in Iowa by disparaging McCain's -- and every POW's -- military service. "He's a war hero because he was captured," Trump said. "I like people that weren't captured." The online response (for what it's worth) was immediate and harsh. Many pointed to the fact that Trump had received deferments that let him avoid service in Vietnam. In an ensuing press conference, Trump blamed a bone spur, among other things. A subsequent written statement offered that Trump has "great respect for all those who serve in our military including those that weren't captured and are also heroes." (And ends with: "Note, Mr. Trump left to a long lasting standing ovation, which will be by far the biggest ovation of the weekend, and much congratulatory praise.") Unsurprisingly, his primary opponents criticized him as well, at varying degrees of severity. As CBS' John Dickerson pointed out on Twitter, Trump's comment allows establishment Republicans who disagreed with Trump's much more vituperative comments about Mexican immigrants to at last lay into him or write him off. Several of Trump's primary opponents were loathe to respond to his immigration comments with much ferocity. But defending illegal immigrants requires a higher political investment than defending former prisoners of war. Ted Cruz, Trump's most reliable defender on the immigration remarks, declined to condemn these comments, either. Voters may react differently. Given the increasing number of times Trump has made outlandish comments that have been disproven or rebuked -- and that Trump has nonetheless steadily risen in the polls -- it's easy to envision Trump not paying much of a price this time, either. Among the conservative voters that rallied to Trump's side after his attacks on immigration, McCain is hardly a favorite. (Some laughter can be heard in the audience following Trump's comment.) But for less fervent voters who liked the idea of straight-shooting Donald Trump who was the only guy talking about immigration, the comments will likely cause some reconsideration of support. Average Republican voters support deporting illegal immigrants. They are far more likely, however, to support military service. It's worth noting that Trump endorsed McCain during the latter's 2008 bid for the presidency. At the time, Trump said that McCain was "a man worthy of respect." He continued: "And this country no longer has respect. What we need more than anything else is just that word: Respect." *Trump slams McCain for being ‘captured’ in Vietnam; other Republicans quickly condemn him <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/18/trump-slams-mccain-for-being-captured-in-vietnam/> // WaPo // Philip Rucker – July 18, 2015 * Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump slammed Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a decorated Vietnam War veteran, on Saturday by saying McCain was not a war hero because he was captured by the North Vietnamese. “He’s not a war hero,” Trump said. Sarcastically, Trump quipped, “He’s a war hero because he was captured.” Then, he added, “I like people that weren’t captured.” Trump’s comments came during his appearance at the Family Leadership Summit, a day-long gathering of about 3,000 social conservative activists that is drawing nine other Republican presidential candidates. A celebrity businessman and reality television star, Trump has surged to the top of polls in the GOP race, in part because of his inflammatory comments about undocumented immigrants from Mexico. Republican leaders and other candidates have been careful in how they respond to his immigration remarks, but his condemnation of McCain opened the floodgates, drawing swift and sharp criticism from other Republicans. Former Texas governor Rick Perry, himself a subject of recent attacks from Trump, said Trump was “unfit” to serve as president and should “immediately withdraw” from the race. “Donald Trump should apologize immediately for attacking Senator McCain and all veterans who have protected and served our country,” Perry said in a statement. “As a veteran and an American, I respect Sen. McCain because he volunteered to serve his country. I cannot say the same of Mr. Trump. His comments have reached a new low in American politics. His attack on veterans make him unfit to be Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, and he should immediately withdraw from the race for President.” Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor, also chimed in with a Twitter post calling or an end to such “slanderous attacks”: Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, campaigning in Western Iowa, denounced Trump’s remarks and said McCain is “undoubtedly an American hero.” This is a change in tune for Walker, who on Friday refused to speak ill of Trump over his immigration comments. “He needs to apologize to Senator McCain and all the other men and women who have worn the uniform,” Walker told reporters following a campaign stop in Sioux City. “It’s just a disgrace.” Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.) posted on Twitter: “America’s POWs deserve much better than to have their service questioned by the offensive rantings of Donald Trump” The Republican National Committee also criticized Trump and defended McCain. “Senator McCain is an American hero because he served his country and sacrificed more than most can imagine. Period,” RNC Chief Strategist and Communications Director Sean Spicer said in a statement. “There is no place in our party or our country for comments that disparage those who have served honorably.” Mitt Romney, who ran against McCain in the 2008 GOP primaries, also took to Twitter to defend him: “The difference between @SenJohnMcCain and @realDonaldTrump: Trump shot himself down. McCain and American veterans are true heroes.” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), who has been perhaps the loudest defender of Trump’s remarks about immigrants and met privately with Trump a few days ago in New York, refused to condemn Trump over his comments about McCain. Cruz said that he considers McCain a friend and “an American war hero” and that it is an honor to serve with him in the Senate. But he said he would not criticize another Republican candidate, including Trump. “I recognize that folks in the press love to see Republican-on-Republican violence, so you want me to say something bad about Donald Trump or bad about John McCain or bad about anyone else,” Cruz told reporters here. “I’m not going to do it. John McCain is a friend of mine. I respect and admire him and he’s an American hero. And Donald Trump is a friend of mine.” For the past few days, Trump has been publicly feuding with McCain, the GOP's 2008 presidential nominee. McCain said that Trump had drawn out “crazies” with his immigration-focused rally in Phoenix last weekend, and Trump responded by calling McCain a “dummy” for finishing at the bottom of his class at the Naval Academy. Trump stepped up his criticism of McCain on Saturday in Ames. He said he had supported McCain's 2008 campaign and claimed to have raised $1 million for him. “He lost,” Trump said. “He let us down. I never liked him as much after that because I don’t like losers.” In a combative, 18-minute news conference following his remarks here, Trump refused to apologize for his attack on McCain's war service. Trump said he considers prisoners of war to be heroes — although he called Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl an exception — but accused McCain of doing little to help veterans in the Senate. “John McCain has not done enough for the veterans,” Trump told reporters. “The veterans in this country are suffering. The veterans in this country are treated as third-class citizens. John McCain talks a lot, but he doesn’t do anything.” Trump grew hot and agitated by repeated and sharp questioning from reporters, who were asking him to explain his earlier suggestion that McCain should not be considered a war hero because he had been captured. “I like the people that don’t get captured, and I respect the people that do get captured,” Trump said. But he did not answer the questions about McCain directly. He snapped at one persistent reporter, “Go back to being a pundit.” Trump managed to avoid serving in the Vietnam war because of a series of draft deferments. Asked why he didn’t serve, Trump said, “I had student deferments and ultimately had a medical deferment because of my feet. I had a bone spur.” But Trump said he did not recall which foot was injured and instructed reporters to look up his records. Trump added, “I was not a big fan of the Vietnam War. I wasn’t a protester, but the Vietnam War was a disaster for our country. What did we get out of the Vietnam War other than death? We got nothing.” After meeting with the news media, Trump took to Twitter, where he did not back down from his criticism of McCain: Outside the political world, Trump was also being widely criticized. Ann Mills-Griffiths, president of the National League of POW/MIA families, a nonprofit group that supports families of American troops held as prisoners of war and those missing in action, said that Trump's comments were inappropriate. “Sen. McCain was a prisoner of war who came home with honor but also continued to serve the nation and certainly the cause of America’s veterans returned and unreturned,” Mills-Griffiths said in an interview. “We all need to be grateful for those who did serve with honor.” John Rowan, president of the Vietnam Veterans of America, said in an interview that the group is “assiduously non-partisan” and does not support candidates or comment on political rhetoric. Rowan said only of Sen. McCain’s service in Vietnam, including his time as a prisoner of war, that “he served his country well.” But Paul Rieckhoff, founder of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, commented that Trump’s remarks were offensive to all veterans who have served overseas. “Trump’s asinine comments about Senator McCain's service are an insult to everyone who has ever worn the uniform — and to all Americans,” Rieckhoff said on Twitter. “Trump’s stupidity is especially egregious given the death of a Navy Petty Officer just this morning and the death of 4 Marines this week. An attack on one veteran's service is an attack on us all.” And John W. Stroud, national commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, said: “For someone who never served a day in uniform to criticize the service and sacrifice of a combat-wounded veteran is despicable.” *Trump Surge Leaves All but Jeb Bush in Donald’s Dust <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/07/18/trump-surge-leaves-all-but-jeb-bush-in-donalds-dust/> // WSJ // Dante Chinni – July 18, 2015 * Something strange has happened to the Republican presidential field since Donald Trump joined it a month ago: Mr. Trump and Jeb Bush are rising. Everyone else is falling in the polls, or seems stuck in place. Mr. Bush’s support has jumped by about four percentage points in the Real Clear Politics average of polls, rising to 15.5%. Mr. Trump’s support has bumped up more than 10 points since mid-June, to 15% as of Friday. And everyone else? Here’s another view of how support for most of them has fallen during the course of the Trump bump. The numbers suggest Mr. Trump is shaking up the GOP primary electorate in a meaningful way. He seems to be taking support from the most conservative and anti-Washington rivals in the field, particularly Mike Huckabee, Scott Walker, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. Mr. Bush’s rise in the polls, coming in tandem with Mr. Trump’s growing strength, may be a sign that so-called establishment Republicans are closing ranks around Mr. Bush, possibly as a result of Mr. Trump consolidating his own support. Marco Rubio may be feeling some of that shift with his sinking numbers. The numbers suggest there may be very different approaches among the candidates to dealing with Mr. Trump, who has the media’s attention right now. Mr. Bush’s rise in the polls suggests that his base of support has little overlap with Mr. Trump’s, and he therefore may have the least to lose in attacking the brash New Yorker. And Mr. Bush, in fact, has criticized Mr. Trump’s now-famous claim that many Mexican immigrants are criminals. The rest of the field may take a more subtle approach to handling Mr. Trump. Attacking him head-on may risk alienating his supporters. There’s reason to believe that Mr. Trump will fade. Many voters have a negative view of him, as a recent USA Today/Suffolk University poll shows, suggesting that he may not weather well over time. If Mr. Trump’s negative ratings hobble him in the nomination fight, his supporters will be up for grabs. And the candidates who have lost support in the last month are going to be looking to get their voters back – and perhaps a chunk of someone else’s supporters, as well. *Trump's Criticism of McCain Overshadows Issues in Iowa <http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/07/18/us/ap-us-gop-2016-social-conservatives-.html> // AP – July 18, 2015 * Donald Trump's criticism Saturday that Sen. John McCain isn't a war hero overshadowed his rivals' quest for support among evangelical voters at an Iowa political gathering designed to showcase their conservative views. In their appeals to more than 2,000 religious conservatives crowded into an sports arena, Trump and other White House hopefuls urged a crackdown on illegal immigration, a forceful approach to the Islamic State group that could include ground troops, and a devotion to Christian values. Yet Trump's questioning of a respected Republican leader's war record dominated the day. When the moderator pressed Trump over his recent remark that McCain was "a dummy" and pointed out that the Arizona Republican was a war hero, Trump said: "He's not a war hero. ... He is a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren't captured." The comment directed at a former prisoner of war drew some boos from the audience and criticism from several Republican rivals who took the stage later in the day. McCain's spokesman offered no comment. Trump's outsized role in the Republican presidential primary began last month when he described Mexican immigrants as "bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists, and some, I assume, are good people." "It turns out I was right," Trump declared on Saturday, citing the recent murder of a California woman by an immigrant in the country illegally. "I am so proud of the fact that I got a dialogue started on illegal immigration." Trump was not alone in his hardline approach on illegal immigration. Once a leading advocate for an immigration overhaul that included an eventual pathway to citizenship, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said Saturday he'd support "work permits or something like that" for immigrants in the country illegally, but only after "we bring illegal immigration under control." Rick Santorum, a former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania, took it a step further. He called for curbs on illegal and legal immigration, suggesting that both groups of immigrants are hurting American-born workers. He specifically called for cutting legal immigration by 20 percent. "What is in the best interests of American workers?" Santorum said. The Republicans' position moves further away from GOP leaders' previous calls to embrace comprehensive immigration changes heading into a presidential election where Hispanic voters are expected to play a critical role. On foreign policy, the candidates offered an aggressive approach to the Islamic State group, whose rise has become an increasing concern for American policy makers and a focus in the Republican presidential primary. Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, a conservative favorite, said he was skeptical of the U.S. invasion of Iraq more than a decade ago. On the Islamic State group, however, Carson said there was a "strong likelihood" that American ground forces would be necessary to contain the threat. "I would send ground troops if I needed ground troops in order to take the land," Carson said. "You're not going to take the land without troops." While not addressing ground forces, Rubio charged that, "ISIS is someone we can humiliate," using an alternative acronym for the group. "We need to subject them to high-profile humiliating defeats that we broadcast and advertise to the world," he continued. "We have won propaganda wars before." The conversation came as evangelical voters eye their options in an extraordinarily crowded Republican presidential contest. There are already 15 high-profile contenders in the race, while two more are expected to join by month's end. Iowa's evangelical voters traditionally hold great sway in the state caucuses, which are expected for the first week in February. Christian conservatives backed the winners of the last two caucuses, Mike Huckabee in 2008 and Rick Santorum in 2012, but neither became their party's nominee. Former Iowa Republican Party Chairman Matt Strawn said it was likely too early for a leader to emerge among Christian conservatives. "Not only are there considerable options within the Christian conservative lane, but there are also those in that lane that demonstrate appeal to a broader base," he said. Indeed, muscular policies on immigration and foreign policy are often popular among the GOP's most passionate voters — as is a commitment to Christian values. "I go to church. And I love God," Trump said. "I'm a religious person. ... People are so shocked when they find this out." *Trump attacks McCain: 'I like people who weren't captured' <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/trump-attacks-mccain-i-like-people-who-werent-captured-120317.html#ixzz3gJ5XuraS> // Politico // Ben Schreckinger – July 18, 2015 * Donald Trump might finally have crossed the line. Appearing on Saturday at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa, the real estate mogul took his running feud with Arizona Sen. John McCain to a new level. “He’s not a war hero,” said Trump. “He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured.” The remarks, which came after days of back-and-forth between McCain and Trump, were met with scattered boos. McCain, a former Navy pilot, spent roughly five-and-half years in a notorious North Vietnamese prison known as the “Hanoi Hilton,” where he was repeatedly tortured. He spent two of those years in solitary confinement. At a press availability following his remarks, Trump denied saying that McCain isn’t a war hero and said, “If somebody’s a prisoner, I consider them a war hero.” He also continued his attacks on the Arizona senator, saying, “I think John McCain’s done very little for the veterans. I’m very disappointed in John McCain.” Trump received four student deferments from military service between 1964 and 1968. In Ames, he told reporters another medical deferment he received after graduating was for a bone spur in his foot. When asked which foot, Trump told reporters to look up the records. In a follow-up statement sent to reporters, Trump again declined to apologize, calling McCain “yet another all talk, no action politician who spends too much time on television and not enough time doing his job.” Trump’s fellow Republican presidential candidates quickly distanced themselves from his remarks — with a few notable exceptions. “Enough with the slanderous attacks,” Jeb Bush tweeted. “@SenJohnMcCain and all our veterans - particularly POWs have earned our respect and admiration.” “John McCain is an American hero. I have nothing but respect for his service to our country,” tweeted Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal. “After Donald Trump spends six years in a POW camp, he can weigh in on John McCain’s service,” he added in a second tweet. ”.@SenJohnMcCain is an American hero & all POW’s deserve our nation’s highest debt of gratitude. @realDonaldTrump’s comments are disgraceful,” tweeted former Texas Gov. Rick Perry. “As a fellow veteran I respect @SenJohnMcCain because he volunteered to serve his country. I cannot say the same about Mr. @realDonaldTrump,” Perry added. He then called in a statement for Trump to drop out of the race. South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a close friend of McCain’s, tweeted, “If there was ever any doubt that @realDonaldTrump should not be our commander in chief, this stupid statement should end all doubt.” He added: “At the heart of @realDonaldTrump statement is a lack of respect for those who have served - a disqualifying characteristic to be president.” At a campaign event in Sioux City, Iowa, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker called McCain “an American hero.” At a press gaggle afterwards, he said of Trump, “I unequivocally denounce him.” “I know @SenJohnMcCain. Senator John McCain is an American hero. Period. Stop,” tweeted New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. “America’s POWs deserve much better than to have their service questioned by the offensive rantings of Donald Trump,” tweeted Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who spoke at the summit before Trump. Sean Spicer, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, tweeted: “.@SenJohnMcCain is an American hero because he served his country and sacrificed more than most can imagine. Period.” “There is no place in our party or our country for comments that disparage those who have served honorably,” he added. Not all Republicans were ready to condemn Trump. When asked by POLITICO if the mogul’s comments were out of line, Santorum declined to comment. In a tweet, he defended McCain, but did not mention Trump: “.@SenJohnMcCain is an American hero, period.” Texas Sen. Ted Cruz spoke at length to reporters about McCain’s heroism between signing books and appearing on-stage at the summit, but he, too, declined to condemn the comments when asked about them. Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, whose appearance followed Trump’s at the summit, declined to comment on Trump’s remarks after leaving the stage. He also would not say when asked whether or not McCain was a war hero. “It depends on your definition of a war hero,” he said. *Trump on John McCain: 'I Like People That Weren't Captured, Okay?' <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-18/trump-on-john-mccain-i-like-people-that-weren-t-captured-okay-> // Bloomberg // Sahil Kapur – July 18, 2015 * Donald Trump went where nobody could have expected even Donald Trump to go. The real estate mogul and Republican presidential candidate, who's leading the field in several recent polls, lit into Senator John McCain of Arizona on Saturday when speaking to a conservative conference, even going after his legendary military service—and drawing instant condemnation from fellow candidates. "He's not a war hero," Trump said in a question-and-answer session with pollster Frank Luntz. Then he altered his comment: "He's a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren't captured, okay?" “He's a war hero because he was captured.” The crowd responded with an awkward mix of shocked "oohs" and scattered applause. "Because he was captured, okay? Perhaps he's a war hero. But right now he's said some very bad things about a lot of people." McCain spent more than five years in captivity as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, a brutal period during which he was tortured and faced solitary confinement, after his plane was shot down. His feud with Trump escalated last week after Trump rallied conservatives in Phoenix against illegal immigration, which McCain, who is running for reelection to the Senate in 2016, told New Yorker "fired up the crazies." Trump retorted: "I know what a crazy is. I know all about crazies. These weren't crazy." And that wasn't all Trump had to say about McCain. He attacked him for having "graduated last in his class" at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis (McCain actually graduated fifth from last). Asked why he didn't serve in the Vietnam War, Trump responded that he had a bone spur, although he couldn't remember in which foot. "It's a long time ago. I had student deferments and ultimately had a medical deferment because of my feet," he said. Badgered by reporters at a news conference shortly after, Trump repeatedly refused to back down or apologize for his attack on McCain, and even launched new missives. "I think John McCain has done very little for the veterans. I'm very disappointed in John McCain." "If someone's a prisoner I would consider that person a war hero. And we have a lot of war heroes that weren't prisoners also. And we should give them credit, too," he said. Trump's fellow Republican candidates at the Ames, Iowa, forum, including Bobby Jindal, Lindsey Graham, and Rick Perry, quickly condemned the comments. "John McCain is an American hero. I have nothing but respect for his service to our country," Louisiana Governor Jindal said on Twitter. "After Donald Trump spends six years in a POW camp, he can weigh in on John McCain's service." Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, who was not at the conference, also tweeted. "Enough with the slanderous attacks." *Trump questions McCain's bravery, says 'he is not a war hero' <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/18/politics/donald-trump-john-mccain-war-hero/> // CNN // Mark Preston & Eugene Scott – July 18, 2015 * Donald Trump ignited a political firestorm Saturday by questioning whether Sen. John McCain -- who spent over five years as a prisoner during the Vietnam War -- is a war hero. By mid-afternoon, Trump tried to walk back his blunder on Twitter, saying "captured or not, all our soldiers are heroes!" But his attempt at damage control seemed unlikely to diminish the anger his remarks had caused. They provoked an immediate outcry from his 2016 presidential rivals and the Republican National Committee, which has expressed concern about the impact his controversial remarks on immigration have had on the GOP brand. For Republicans waiting to pounce on Trump and knock him from his position as the party's leading presidential candidate, the real estate mogul may have handed them an opening. Cruz declines to denounce Trump's McCain comments The controversy began early Saturday afternoon, when Trump, speaking at a question-and-answer session at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa, commented on McCain, with whom he's recently feuded over illegal immigration. "He is not a war hero," Trump told pollster Frank Luntz, who was hosting the session. "He is a war hero," Luntz interjected. "He is a war hero because he was captured," Trump said, cutting him off. "I like people that weren't captured, OK? I hate to tell you. He is a war hero because he was captured. OK, you can have -- I believe perhaps he is a war hero." The comments met with a mix of gasps, boos, laughter and some applause from an audience. McCain, a Naval aviator, was shot down in 1967 over North Vietnam and fractured both arms and legs after being ejected from his aircraft. He was repeatedly tortured during his stay in the notorious "Hanoi Hilton" -- and refused early release when the North Vietnamese learned his father was a Navy admiral -- until he finally returned home in 1973 following the Paris Peace Accords. The Arizona senator, who has limited mobility in his arms following his war experience, received the Distinguished Flying Cross, a Silver Star and a Purple Heart for his service. Trump believes in God, but hasn't sought forgiveness Trump, meanwhile, received several deferments during the war. According to The Smoking Gun, which obtained selective service records for Trump in 2011, he received four student deferments between 1964 and 1968, and later a medical deferment in 1968. McCain spokesman Brian Rogers told CNN that the senator would have no comment on Trump's statements. But McCain's daughter, Meghan, tweeted that she was "horrified" and "disgusted" by the remarks. "I can't believe what I am reading this morning," she said. "There are no words." 2016 GOP hopefuls rip remark Trump's comments were swiftly condemned on Twitter Saturday afternoon, with multiple Republican 2016 candidates blasting the remarks. Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry said in emotional comments made to an audience at the summit that if Trump doesn't apologize, he is unfit to be commander-in-chief of the United States. "To disparage a legitimate American hero like John McCain -- you may disagree with his policies and that's fine. I tell people all the time it's OK to question your government," said Perry, an Air Force veteran. "But don't question the men and women of the military who sacrifice and sometimes pay a huge price for our safety and our freedom and our economics." Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, a frequent target of Trump's criticism, also came to McCain's defense. "Enough with the slanderous attacks. @SenJohnMcCain and all our veterans - particularly POWs have earned our respect and admiration," he tweeted. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal called McCain "a hero" on Twitter. South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a close friend of McCain's, fired off a series of tweets criticizing Trump and questioning his qualifications to be president in light of the comments. But while Texas Sen. Ted Cruz -- who has stood out in the 2016 field as a supporter of Trump's controversial remarks on immigration -- defended McCain in a tweet, he notably declined to criticize Trump when asked by reporters to comment on the real estate mogul's remarks. Instead, he blamed the media for trying to turn Republicans against each other. "You know I recognize that folks in the press love to see Republican-on-Republican violence, and so you want me to say something bad about Donald Trump, or bad about John McCain or bad about anyone else," he said. "I'm not going to do it." Retired neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson was also asked if he defined McCain as a war hero, and said that while he believed the senator has "done some wonderful things," he also stopped short of denouncing Trump. "It depends on your definition of a war hero. I think he has done some wonderful things, certainly the history is consistent with what we would consider a war hero," Carson said. "So do we take that away from him because some people disagree with him politically? I think that's probably a stupid way to do things." Mitt Romney, the 2012 presidential candidate, vouched for McCain's heroism and praised veterans on Twitter. "The difference between @SenJohnMcCain and @realDonaldTrump: Trump shot himself down. McCain and American veterans are true heroes," he tweeted. But Trump dismissed Romney -- and McCain again -- in a tweet. Why would anybody listen to @MittRomney? He lost an election that should have easily been won against Obama. By the way, so did John McCain," he tweeted. Sean Spicer, the communications director for the Republican National Committee, said in a statement that McCain "is an American hero because he served his country and sacrificed more than most can imagine. Period." "There is no place in our party or our country for comments that disparage those who have served honorably," Spicer said. Secretary of State John Kerry, a Vietnam War veteran, said McCain is "a hero, a man of grit and guts and character personified. He served and bled and endured unspeakable acts of torture." Speaking to reporters after the event, Trump sought to clarify his comments. "If a person is captured, they're a hero as far as I'm concerned," Trump said. "But you have to do other things also. I don't like the job John McCain is doing in the Senate. He's not taking care of our veterans." Borger: Trump is the guy GOP candidates can't afford to ignore His campaign also released a statement, in which Trump said McCain has done "little" for U.S. veterans. "I am not a fan John McCain because he has done so little for our veterans, and he should know better than anybody what the veterans need, especially in regards to the (Department of Veterans Affairs)," Trump said in the statement. "He is yet another all-talk, no-action politician who spends too much time on television and not enough time doing his job and helping the vets. He is also allowing our military to decrease substantially in size and strength, something which should never be allowed to happen." Joel Arends, chairman of Veterans for a Strong America, in a statement said feuding between McCain and Trump over issues "has nothing to do with Mr. Trump's high regard for the military or veterans as a whole. Mr. Trump is supporter of the U.S. military and of America's veterans. It is well known that when Mr. Trump is attacked by a detractor, he swings back." The group said it was glad Trump clarified his remarks and said McCain is a war hero. This is not the first time Trump has taken a jab at the 2008 Republican nominee this week. After McCain criticized Trump's visit to Phoenix last weekend, saying he "fired up the crazies" in regard to his controversial comments on illegal immigration, Trump called the Arizona senator a "dummy" on Twitter. ".@SenJohnMcCain should be defeated in the primaries. Graduated last in his class at Annapolis--dummy," he said. In his campaign's statement on Saturday, Trump again referenced illegal immigration as the main reason for his feud with McCain. "Furthermore, he was extremely disrespectful to the thousands upon thousands of people, many of whom happen to be his constituents, that came to listen to me speak about illegal immigration in Phoenix last week by calling them 'crazies,'" the statement said. "These were not 'crazies' -- these were great American citizens." Trump supported McCain's presidential candidacy in 2008. He donated $28,450 to John McCain's Victory Committee, a super PAC, and endorsed him on CNN's "Larry King Live" that year, calling him "a smart guy and I think he's going to be a great president." During Saturday's Q&A session, Trump claimed he raised $1 million for the Arizona senator. After the event, Trump added on Twitter that McCain "let us down by losing to Barack Obama in his run for President!" *Republicans Condemn Donald Trump After He Belittles John McCain’s War Record <https://time.com/3963612/donald-trump-john-mccain-military-service/> // TIME // Zeke Miller – July 18, 2015 * The Republican National Committee and a bevy of GOP presidential candidates lined up to repudiate Donald Trump on Saturday after the reality television star-turned-White House hopeful attacked the military service of Sen. John McCain, a former POW. Appearing at a candidate cattle call in Ames, Iowa, the real estate mogul told a crowd he was no supporter of the 2008 Republican presidential nominee. “He was a war hero because he was captured,” Trump said. “I like people who weren’t captured.” Trump’s critique of McCain did what his previous controversial remarks could not quite do: open the floodgates for fellow Republicans to denounce him. After all, the perceived political risk inherent in defending the record of a war hero is far less than that of getting involved in contentious debates around immigration. McCain, who was held captive in Vietnam for nearly six years after his airplane was shot down over Hanoi, has been critical of the Trump’s bombast, saying that it had “fired up the crazies.” Trump’s already-controversial mocking of the Arizona senator is only the latest in a series of provocative statements and scandals that have swirled around his campaign, including his comment that many Mexican immigrants are “rapists” and his claim “The illegals come in, and the illegals kill their children.” “Senator McCain is an American hero because he served his country and sacrificed more than most can imagine. Period,” said RNC communications director Sean Spicer. “There is no place in our party or our country for comments that disparage those who have served honorably.” Trump, who is riding atop the GOP primary polls, appears certain to make the first GOP debate stage on Aug. 6, even as the RNC is facing escalating calls to somehow bar him from participating. But under Federal Election Commission rules, there is no legal mechanism for the party or the hosting network, Fox News, to ban a candidate who meets the qualifications. But the comments about McCain have set up a race among GOP candidates to most-forcefully condemn their fellow candidate, a trend that is likely to continue live on national television at the debate. In a statement, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry said Trump’s comments were disqualifying and, “he should immediately withdraw from the race for President.” Other candidates and Republican leaders weighed in on stage at the Iowa Family Leader summit after Trump spoke, or took to Twitter to lambast him: For his part, Trump issued a statement lambasting McCain’s “extremely disrespectful” description of Trump supporters and saying in part, “I have great respect for all those who serve in our military including those that weren’t captured and are also heroes.” But the statement showed no signs of contrition, noting, “Mr. Trump left to a long lasting standing ovation, which will be by far the biggest ovation of the weekend, and much congratulatory praise.” In a series of Twitter postings later, Trump lauded veterans but did not back off his earlier remarks, and in fact continued to criticize McCain’s record. *Donald Trump Hits the Limits of Celebrity <http://time.com/3963685/donald-trump-john-mccain/> // TIME // Zeke Miller – July 18, 2015 * Controversy has always been at the heart of Donald Trump’s professional career, defined by his ostentatious displays of wealth, innumerable public feuds, and a television show built around firing people. So when he entered the political arena, there was little question that it would revolve around the same, but few predicted the Trump-sized firestorm he set off Saturday when he criticized the military service of former Vietnam POW Sen. John McCain. After a lifetime in the spotlight, Trump is painfully learning the difference between the rules of the game when playing as a candidate instead of a celebrity. For years, Republicans have courted Trump’s endorsement, entertainment, and deep pockets, tolerating—even encouraging and profiting from—his longstanding list of outlandish comments. They invited him to keynote state party conventions and to endorse their 2012 nominee, even as they stood silently by as he challenged President Obama’s birthplace and indulged in his routine name-calling. Not even comments deemed insulting to a vital segment of the electorate—suggesting that many who have immigrated to the U.S. illegally from Mexico are “rapists”—were enough to spark widespread condemnation. But on Saturday the floodgates opened, with Trump criticism flowing from nearly every fellow 2016 candidate, the Republican National Committee, former GOP nominee Mitt Romney, and even Fox News’ Rupert Murdoch. For many in the party, it was a long-anticipated occasion—the inevitable moment when the candidate so obviously and completely stepped in it that sitting silent was no longer an option. “He’s not a war hero,” Trump said Saturday of the 2008 Republican presidential nominee at a candidate forum in Ames, Iowa. “He’s a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured.” Trump avoided serving in the Vietnam War using four deferments, including a medical deferment for a bone spur. McCain was shot down over Hanoi and imprisoned for nearly six years, undergoing physical and psychological torture at the infamous Hanoi Hilton. Already feeling the financial burn of the ending of a series of financial and endorsement deals in the wake of his immigration comments, the statement set Trump on the path to becoming a Party pariah. The swift reaction reflected both the GOP’s pent-up frustration with the man at the top of their primary polls, and the reality that in Republican politics, offending those in the U.S. illegally may provoke mild consternation, but attacking veterans is sacrilegious. “When is Donald Trump going to stop embarrassing his friends, let alone the whole country,” Murdoch tweeted Sunday. Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who has sought to use his criticism of Trump to his own political advantage, became the first GOP candidate to call on his rival to withdraw from the race, as South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham called it disqualifying for the highest office in the land. “Seems to me that there’s an enormous sense of relief among Republicans that he f—-d up so badly,” said one Republican operative. Party officials, including RNC Chairman Reince Priebus, had been sending signals to Trump for weeks to tone down his rhetoric against those in the U.S. illegally for fear of alienating Hispanic voters. They also were critical of his frequent criticisms of fellow Republicans, violating Ronald Reagan’s 11th commandment. “There is no place in our party or our country for comments that disparage those who have served honorably,” RNC communications director Sean Spicer said in a statement Saturday in response to the McCain comments, an exceptionally rare critique of a presidential candidate’s own party. In a defiant statement Saturday, Trump criticized McCain for allegedly failing veterans which noted that he has “great respect” for people who served in the military. It concluded without any effort at appeasing his critics: “Mr. Trump left to a long lasting standing ovation, which will be by far the biggest ovation of the weekend, and much congratulatory praise.” *After Donald Trump says John McCain 'not a war hero,' Republican rivals denounce him <http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-trump-mccain-20150718-story.html> // LA Times // Noah Bierman – July 18, 2015 * nald Trump, whose bombastic statements have shot him to the top of Republican presidential primary polls, mocked Sen. John McCain's war record as a POW in Vietnam on Saturday, crossing a line that triggered condemnations from previously quiet GOP leaders and rivals. They used their strongest terms to date — calling Trump’s comments “slanderous,” declaring him unfit for office, and asserting that the Republican Party has no tolerance for disparaging statements about combat veterans. The question now is whether Trump, who saw his campaign take off after broadly denouncing Mexicans who cross the border illegally as rapists and drug dealers, will remain popular with segments of the GOP base who revere military service, prisoners of war and the 2008 presidential nominee’s connection to both. “He’s not a war hero,” Trump said at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa, in response to a question about McCain, who has sharply criticized Trump’s withering comments on immigrants. “He's a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren't captured, OK? I hate to tell you. He's a war hero because he was captured, OK? And I believe — perhaps he's a war hero. But right now, he's said some very bad things about a lot of people,” Trump said. McCain, a Navy aviator during the Vietnam War, suffered several broken bones and spent more than five years as a prisoner in North Vietnam, including two years in solitary confinement, after his Skyhawk was shot down during a bombing mission over Hanoi in 1967. McCain, the son of the U.S. Navy commander in the Pacific at the time, refused North Vietnamese offers for an early release because Americans captured before him remained prisoners of war. He was released in 1973, and has served Arizona in the Senate since 1987. The Republican now heads the Senate Armed Services Committee. Trump received four student deferments from the draft between 1964 and 1968 and a medical deferment that kept him out of the military, according to reports published in 2011. For all the expressions of indignation, the dust-up inevitably was a reminder of Republican-backed attacks on combat medals awarded to John F. Kerry, the former senator, 2004 Democratic presidential nominee and now secretary of State, for his service in Vietnam. The attacks, which hurt Kerry's 2004 campaign, ultimately were discredited as untrue. Since announcing his campaign on June 16, Trump has lost numerous commercial endorsements and business deals due to his harsh comments about Mexican immigrants. His rhetoric has worried Republican leaders, who are trying to broaden the party’s support among women and minorities, especially the growing number of Latino voters, before the 2016 election. In a Univision poll, 71% of Latinos surveyed had an unfavorable view of Trump. Some GOP candidates have refrained from criticizing Trump until now because many core conservatives, who vote heavily in Republican primaries, support him. A Fox News poll released Friday found 68% of GOP voters said Trump was “basically right” about immigration. But by appearing to attack military veterans and POWs, a more powerful constituency among conservatives and other voters, Trump may finally have given party leaders a chance to pop his balloon, which has been eclipsing other candidates. The Republican National Committee immediately denounced Trump’s comments Saturday, saying “there is no place in our party or our country for comments that disparage those who have served honorably.” Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who had previously avoided discussing Trump, told reporters Saturday, “I unequivocally denounce him,” according to his campaign. Fellow leading candidates Sen. Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican whose parents were born in Cuba, and Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor whose wife is Mexican American, also criticized Trump. “Enough with the slanderous attacks,” Bush wrote on Twitter. Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry — who days ago condemned Trump’s “toxic mix of demagoguery and nonsense” — on Saturday called upon him to end his campaign because of comments that have “reached a new low in American politics.” “His attack on veterans make him unfit to be commander-in-chief of the U.S. armed forces, and he should immediately withdraw from the race for president,” Perry said in a statement. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal said on Twitter that “after Donald Trump spends six years in a POW camp, he can weigh in on John McCain's service.” Texas Sen. Ted Cruz was a notable exception, calling McCain a friend and hero on Twitter but adding, “Donald Trump is a friend of mine.” Trump has clashed verbally with McCain, who supported a comprehensive immigration overhaul that passed the Senate but died in the House. While on a campaign swing in Phoenix last week, Trump slammed McCain in his home state, violating normal rules of party politics. “I've supported John McCain, but he's very weak on immigration,” Trump said. He also questioned whether McCain, who is up for reelection in 2016, would hold onto his Senate seat. “I think he will probably lose if somebody runs against him for the Republican nomination,” Trump said. McCain told the New Yorker that Trump’s comments were “very hurtful ... because what he did was he fired up the crazies.” On Saturday, his daughter Meghan McCain said on Twitter that she was “horrified” and “disgusted” by Trump’s latest comments: “There are no words.” *Trump clarifies attacks on McCain <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/248431-trump-clarifies-attacks-on-mccain> // The Hill // Keith Laing – July 18, 2015 * Donald Trump accused Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) of being "all talk, no action" on veterans issues on Saturday as he sought to clarify his dismissive words toward McCain earlier in the day. "I am not a fan of John McCain because he has done so little for our Veterans and he should know better than anybody what the Veterans need, especially in regards to the VA," Trump said in a statement released by his campaign. "He is yet another all talk, no action politician who spends too much time on television and not enough time doing his job and helping the Vets," Trump continued. "He is also allowing our military to decrease substantially in size and strength, somethings which should never be allowed to happen." Trump faced immediate criticism Saturday after mocking McCain’s six years as a prisoner during the Vietnam War. “He was a war hero because he was captured,” Trump sarcastically told host Frank Luntz during the 2015 Family Leadership Summit. “I like people who weren’t captured.” Trump was swiftly rebuked by the Republican National Committee and several of his fellow 2016 Republican presidential candidates. Trump said in his statement that McCain has been "extremely disrespectful to the thousands upon thousands of people, many of whom happen to be his constituents, that came out to listen to me speak about illegal immigration by calling them 'crazies.' "These were not 'crazies' --- these were great American citizens," Trump said. "I have great respect for all those who serve in our military including those that weren't captured and are also heroes," he continued. "I want to strengthen our military and take care of our veterans. I want to make America great again, especially for those that serve to protect our freedom. I am fighting for our veterans!" Trump’s statement noted at the end: “Mr. Trump left to a long lasting standing ovation, which will be by far the biggest ovation of the weekend, and much congratulatory praise.” *Draft-Dodging Trump Says POW McCain ‘Not A War Hero’ <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/07/18/draft-dodging-trump-says-pow-mccain-not-a-war-hero.html> // Daily Beast // Olivia Nuzzi – July 18, 2015 * In September 2008, Donald Trump donated $28,450 to John McCain’s Victory Committee and endorsed him on Larry King Live. “I know him. I like him. I respect him,” he said. “He’s a smart guy and I think he’s going to be a great president.” Seven years later, Trump is the one running, and he now respects McCain, who spent five years as a prisoner during the Vietnam War, so little that he says he’s not really a war hero. During a discussion at the Family Leadership Summit in Iowa Saturday afternoon, Trump said, “He’s not a war hero. He’s a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren’t captured, OK? I hate to tell you.” Trump, whose candidacy has been defined by his insults to various groups of people and even entire ethnicities, finally went too far. Paul Rieckhoff, the founder and CEO of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, told The Daily Beast that Trump’s comments were “asinine” and an insult “to everyone who’s ever worn the uniform and to all Americans.” Rick Perry, one of just two Republican primary contenders to have served in the military (the other is Senator Lindsey Graham), called for Trump to withdraw from the contest. “Donald Trump should apologize immediately for attacking Senator McCain and all veterans who have protected and served our country,” he said in a statement. “As a veteran and an American, I respect Sen. McCain because he volunteered to serve his country. I cannot say the same of Mr. Trump. His comments have reached a new low in American politics. His attack on veterans make him unfit to be Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, and he should immediately withdraw from the race for President.” Lindsey Graham responded to Trump on Twitter: “At the heart of @realDonaldTrump statement is a lack of respect for those who have served—a disqualifying characteristic to be president.” So did Jeb Bush: “Enough with the slanderous attacks. @SenJohnMcCain and all our veterans–particularly POWs have earned our respect and admiration.” And Scott Walker: “Just told a crowd in Sioux City: @SenJohnMcCain is a war hero.” “He’s not a war hero. He’s a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren’t captured, OK? I hate to tell you.” And Bobby Jindal: “After Donald Trump spends 6 years in a POW camp, he can weigh in on John McCain’s service.” And Rick Santorum: “.@SenJohnMcCain is an American hero, period.” And Chris Christie: "I know @SenJohnMcCain. Senator John McCain is an American hero. Period. Stop." Ted Cruz initially stood out as being the only candidate to refuse to stand by McCain, telling The Washington Post’s Philip Rucker, “Folks in the press love to see Republican on Republican violence, so you want me to say something bad about Donald Trump or bad about John McCain or bad about anyone else. I’m not going to do it.” Perhaps regretting that decision, Cruz then Tweeted, “John McCain is an American hero. Although we have some policy disagreements, I’m proud to serve alongside him.” As the crowd in Iowa laughed, gasped and booed—unsure if Trump was joking—he doubled down on his point. “He’s a war hero because he was captured! OK? I believe, perhaps, he’s a war hero. But right now? He’s said some very bad things about a lot of people.” Actually, he’s said very bad things about just one person who Trump cares a lot about: Trump. On Thursday, The New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza published an interview with McCain, wherein the Arizona senator criticized Trump, who had just held a rally in Phoenix. “This performance with our friend out in Phoenix is very hurtful,” McCain said. “Because what he did was he fired up the crazies.” It would become evident, in the following days, that Trump—callous and bombastic by nature—had hurt feelings. He immediately lashed out first on Twitter, saying “The thousands of people that showed up for me in Phoenix were amazing Americans. @SenJohnMcCain called them ‘crazies’—must apologize!” He then said he thought McCain should lose his Senate primary: “.@SenJohnMcCain should be defeated in the primaries. Graduated last in his class at Anapolis--dummy!” And then in an interview on MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Friday. “I’m a loyalist,” he said. “I’m a person that like, if somebody is with me, I’m with that person. And John McCain was very disloyal to me.” Saturday afternoon, in a statement following his insult to McCain, Trump said that McCain, whose office has not yet responded to a request for comment from The Daily Beast, had been “disrespectful” to the people who came to see him speak in Phoenix when he told The New Yorker they were “crazies.” “These were not ‘crazies,’” Trump said. “These were great American citizens.” Trump’s decision to criticize McCain’s military record is all the more puzzling given the circumstances surrounding his lack of one. Trump claimed, in an April interview on WNYW, that he avoided the Vietnam War because “I actually got lucky because I had a very high draft number.” He said, while attending the Wharton School of Finance, that “I was watching as they did the draft numbers and I got a very, very high number and those numbers never got up to me.” But The Smoking Gun reported that Trump’s draft number was 365, and when it was drawn on Dec. 1, 1968, “18 months after Trump graduated” from the Wharton School, Trump “had already received four student deferments and a medical deferment,” according to records obtained by the publication. Rieckhoff joked, “He was so interested in seeing the president’s birth certificate, I’m sure he’d be willing to provide the documentation about that.” Despite his lack of service, Trump, in the post-insult statement, said, “I am not a fan of John McCain because he has done so little for our Veterans and he should know better than anybody what the Veterans need, especially in regards to the VA. He is yet another all talk, no action politician who spends too much time on television and not enough time doing his job and helping Vets.” It was, in fact, McCain (along with Senator Bernie Sanders, a candidate for the Democratic nomination) who last year passed legislation to reform the Department of Veterans Affairs and improve veterans’ access to health care, among other things. In the statement, Trump clarified that he has “great respect for all those who serve in our military including those that weren’t captured and are also heroes.” The release ended with a “note”: “Mr. Trump left to a long lasting standing ovation, which will be by far the biggest ovation of the weekend, and much congratulatory praise.” *Trump fuels GOP fire with criticism of McCain* <http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/248439-trump-fuels-gop-fire-with-criticism-of-mccain>* // The Hill // Mark Hensch – July 18, 2015 * Republicans of all stripes spent Saturday hammering Donald Trump for his remarks mocking Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) over his time spent as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. Many of the GOP’s most visible members are suggesting the outspoken billionaire and presidential candidate went too far taunting McCain during a speech Saturday afternoon. “He was a war hero because he was captured,” Trump sarcastically told host Frank Luntz during the 2015 Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa. “I like people who weren’t captured.” The quip came after Luntz challenged Trump’s criticisms of McCain’s political career. The pollster questioned his verbal attacks on McCain, calling him a “war hero.” “I supported McCain for president,” Trump said. “He lost and let us down,” he added, arguing he spent $1 million supporting McCain’s Oval Office bid. “I’ve never liked him as much after that,” Trump added. “I don’t like losers.” The Republican National Committee (RNC) quickly rejected the business mogul’s remarks. “Senator McCain is an American hero because he served his country and sacrificed more than we can imagine – period,” said RNC Chief Strategist and Communications Director Sean Spicer said in a statement. “There is no place in our party or our country for comments that disparage those who have served honorably,” he added. Trump’s many rivals for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination joined the RNC in discrediting his political legitimacy. Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry said Trump should immediately mend fences with McCain over his remarks, or end his campaign. “As an individual who has worn the uniform of this country, I was highly offended by what Donald Trump said about John McCain,” Perry said during his own 2015 Family Leadership Summit remarks. “Donald Trump owes every American, and in particular John McCain, an apology,” he added. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close friend of McCain’s, argued McCain and other prisoners of war like him deserve “recognition and respect” for their sacrifices. “If you want to be commander-in-chief and you are serious about wanting that job, the last thing you’d do is disrespect the people in our armed services,” he said. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush expressed disgust with Trump’s statements in a post on Twitter. “Enough with the slanderous attacks,” he tweeted. “@SenJohnMcCain and all our veterans – particularly POWs have earned our respect and admiration.” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) was equally dismissive of Trump. “America’s POWs deserve much better than to have their service questioned by the offensive rantings of Donald Trump,” he wrote. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker vowed he would personally defend McCain’s tenure during the Vietnam War against any critics. “@SenJohnMcCain is an American hero, period,” he said on Twitter. “I’ll denounce any attack against his service and anyone else who wears this uniform.” Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas), who considers himself a friend of both McCain and Trump, refused comment on the bitter feud. “I recognize that folks in the press love to see Republican-on-Republican violence, so you want me to say something about Donald Trump or bad about John McCain or bad about anyone else,” he said, according to The Washington Post. “I’m not going to do it.” “John McCain is a friend of mine,” Cruz added. “I respect and admire him and he’s an American hero. And Donald Trump is a friend of mine.” Former GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney noted the differences between McCain and Trump’s military backgrounds in his own pointed criticism on Twitter. “The difference between @SenJohnMcCain and @realDonaldTrump: Trump shot himself down,” Romney wrote. “McCain and American veterans are true heroes.” Megan McCain, John McCain’s daughter, expressed disbelief that Trump would insult her father’s sacrifices during the Vietnam War. “I can’t believe what I am reading this morning,” she wrote on Twitter. “Horrified. Disgusted. There are no words.” “I have a brother that just returned from Afghanistan a month ago, glad he can come home to this being said about his father and his service,” she added. The Concerned Veterans of America (CVA) offered a comparison between McCain and Trump on military service in its own rebuke of the real estate mogul. “Donald Trump’s attacks against Senator John McCain today are the height of arrogance and reveal that he has no understanding of what our Vietnam POWs endured and the honor they displayed during their captivity – Senator McCain among them,” the group said in a statement. “A man who received four student deferments to avoid service in Vietnam has absolutely no credibility to attack someone like John McCain who volunteered to serve his country and suffered 5 1/2 years of torture as a result,” it said. The military personnel organization took issue with Trump’s remarks over veterans affairs made during the same controversial speech. “Donald Trump also revealed he has no idea what he is talking about in regards to reforming and fixing the VA,” it said. “If he did, he would have known that Senator McCain has been a leader in fighting to give veterans more health care choices and to hold the VA accountable for its failures,” it added. “Finally, this incident should clarify for veterans which leaders really understand the issues they face and the sacrifices they made as part of their military service. Unfortunately, it appears Donald Trump is not one of them.” Later Saturday, as criticism was percolating, Trump sought to clarify his remarks, saying his problem with McCain stems from the senator’s policy stances. "I am not a fan of John McCain because he has done so little for our Veterans and he should know better than anybody what the Veterans need, especially in regards to the VA," Trump said in a statement released by his campaign. "He is yet another all talk, no action politician who spends too much time on television and not enough time doing his job and helping the Vets," he continued. "He is also allowing our military to decrease substantially in size and strength, somethings which should never be allowed to happen." Trump also accused McCain of being “extremely disrespectful” toward attendees of an immigration rally in Phoenix last weekend that was headlined by Trump. "These were not 'crazies' --- these were great American citizens," he said. "I have great respect for all those who serve in our military including those that weren't captured and are also heroes," Trump added. "I want to strengthen our military and take care of our veterans. I want to make America great again, especially for those that serve to protect our freedom. I am fighting for our veterans!" Trump’s statement noted at the end: “Mr. Trump left to a long lasting standing ovation, which will be by far the biggest ovation of the weekend, and much congratulatory praise.” Trump was taking issue with McCain’s critique of his July 11 rally against illegal immigration in Phoenix. McCain argued in an interview published Thursday that the event energized the right wing’s most extreme members. “It’s very bad,” he said of Trump’s Phoenix rally earlier this month. “This performance with our friend out in Phoenix is very hurtful,” McCain added. “Because what he did was he fired up the crazies. Now he galvanized them. He’s really got them activated.” Trump has retaliated by calling McCain a “dummy” and predicting he will lose his upcoming Senate primary in Arizona. Trump on Saturday said McCain is insulting the Americans who support stronger policies against illegal immigration. “15,000 people showed up to hear me speak,” Trump said of the Phoenix event, adding that it was “beautiful.” “He called them all crazy,” he added of McCain. “I know all about crazies, and those weren’t crazies.” *Trump comments on McCain war record spark outrage <http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2015/07/18/trump-mccain-war-hero-captured/30347573/> // USA Today // Jason Noble – July 18, 2015 * Donald Trump's insults of Sen. John McCain at a presidential candidate forum here on Saturday drew sharp and immediate condemnation from across the Republican spectrum — including calls for him to quit the 2016 race. The swift, nearly unanimous rebuke prompted by Trump's comments questioning McCain's war heroism may suggest a shift in the Republican presidential contest, as rivals seize an opportunity to marginalize a popular but divisive figure who some see as potentially destructive to the party's standing among Latino voters. The comments that sparked the firestorm came after forum moderator Frank Luntz interrupted a Trump tirade against McCain to note the senator's heroism in the Vietnam War and the more than five years he was held as a prisoner of war. "He's a war hero because he was captured," Trump replied dismissively. "I like people that weren't captured, OK?" Trump went on to insult McCain's academic achievements at the U.S. Naval Academy. At a subsequent news conference, he said McCain "has not done enough for the veterans in this country." The businessman and reality TV star, who entered the GOP race last month, has dominated media coverage for weeks with controversial comments on immigration and unflinching criticism of other candidates. More recently, he's begun to take the lead in national polls. But by expanding his bombastic rhetoric to include criticism of a former prisoner of war, Trump may have overplayed his hand, even with Republicans eager for a candidate at odds with the political establishment, said political scientist Kyle Kondik, managing editor of a political newsletter published by the University of Virginia. "There's a constituency that supports the pretty stridently anti-illegal immigration comments which Trump has made," Kondik said. "But I don't think there's a constituency for comments that come off as anti-military or basically making fun of POWs, which is what Trump did." Indeed, rival GOP candidates, party officials and others who may have been looking for an opportunity to distance themselves from Trump seized on the comments. Within an hour, at least a half-dozen fellow candidates tweeted to either criticize Trump or defend McCain, and a few did so on the very same stage at Stephens Auditorium later on Saturday. Cary Gordon, an evangelical pastor from Sioux City, said that he has seen Trump surging in Iowa in recent weeks and that Trump has surprised many grass-roots conservative activists with his accessibility and thoughtfulness at campaign events. But that momentum is almost certainly lost now, Gordon said. "Donald Trump probably handed ammunition to his own firing squad today," he said. Trump's comments came during the Family Leadership Summit, a key forum for candidates seeking to win approval from the state's sizable bloc of socially conservative evangelical voters. At a news conference following his appearance, Trump did not apologize for his remarks, according to the Associated Press. He did offer this clarification: “If a person is captured, they’re a hero as far as I’m concerned. I don’t like the job John McCain is doing in the Senate because he is not taking care of our veterans.” Also appearing Saturday were presidential candidates Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee, Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum, Lindsey Graham and Scott Walker. Cruz, a senator from Texas, won numerous standing ovations and some of the loudest cheers of the day with red-meat conservative rhetoric opposing abortion — including calling for criminal investigations into Planned Parenthood — same-sex marriage and Islamic extremism. "Cruz has stood up and taken stands against what we call the mainstream political machine," said Jeanne Shattuck, an attendee from Dallas Center. Jindal, the Louisiana governor, competed with Cruz on crowd response, hitting big applause lines when criticizing the media for failing to adequately scrutinize President Obama and calling for federal employees to be jailed for malfeasance. Similarly, Graham, a senator from South Carolina, received sustained, booming applause for criticism of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's handling of the attack in Benghazi, Libya, as secretary of state, an issue that has animated conservatives but had received relatively little mention Saturday. Rubio, a senator from Florida, has been viewed with skepticism among many conservatives for his previous support for a comprehensive immigration reform package in the Senate. On Saturday, though, he appealed to many in the crowd with substantive answers on immigration, the Islamic State and entitlement reform. Edward Wollner, a supporter of Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, said Rubio's performance made him "a little bit more viable." "Honestly, I came in pretty closed-minded on Rand," Wollner said. "Rubio I had kind of written off as a young, one-term senator, but he could actually be competitive in a general election." Many attendees were complimentary toward all the candidates who appeared on Saturday, and far from ready to commit to one with the caucuses still more than six months away. "It's a no-lose situation, if you're a conservative, at this point," said Scott Schaefer, a pastor from Davenport who described himself not as a Republican but as a "Christian conservative compassionate capitalist constitutionalist." "This country needs a pastor, someone to shepherd this country." *After Attacking John McCain's War Record, Donald Trump's Dramatic Fall Is Predictable <http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnzogby/2015/07/18/step-right-up-trump-is-the-bearded-lady-of-2016-race/> // Forbes – July 18, 2015 * Mr. Trump has decided to attack Senator John McCain’s war record.” He’s not a war hero,” said Trump. “He’s a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren’t captured.” Mr. McCain is, in fact, a bona fide war hero who rejected efforts to release him in exchange for selling out his fellow prisoners of war. Mr. Trump’s activities extend only to building monuments to himself because no one else apparently will do so. This is shameful. But let’s be serious, folks. Donald Trump’s rise in the polls is as predictable as his dramatic fall will be. The Donald knows how to capture media attention. After all, he has been doing it for decades now. He has teased about running in the past and received too much coverage for that. Now he is a declared candidate and he dominates attention for himself, something he craves and masters, by simply being outrageous. He is Kim Kardashian’s rear, Paris Hilton’s sex tape, and Caitlin Jenner’s transformation – all rolled into one and now dominating media attention. In short order, Donald Trump’s candidacy will be Sarah Palin’s plea for attention and Kate Gosselin’s whatever. But we are talking about the Presidency of the United States and now, today, the inevitable merging of this iconic institution with celebrity culture. Enter The Donald. He has “surged” and “rocketed” – both Washington Post terms – into second place in the battle for the Republican nomination. Then, as of now, into first place. Stuff happens. Some pundits say he is tapping into something. There is a rage against the machine and Donald Trump represents a genuine phenomenon. But let me be emphatic here: There is nothing genuine about him or about this. Allow me to explain. First, there is a real anger out there among voters. There was George Wallace, Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot, then the Tea Party. This is a bona fide strain in American history. It is called xenophobia and fear of the modern. It is the angry white man in a nation that is becoming more non-white, less heterosexual, and less reliant on either organized religion or traditional notions of patriotism. The demographics alone show how much the America of “the old white man” is shrinking. And today, in this worldview, is Armegeddon , the worst case scenario – a President who is a man of color, with a Muslim name, insufficient proof of his nativity, and in possession of a worldview that recognizes the limits of U.S. power in the world and a willingness to lead from behind. Enter Donald Trump. Yes, indeed, Mr. Trump has struck a responsive chord among some. But let’s not get carried away with it. When the Washington Post reported almost two weeks ago that Mr. Trump had both “surged” and “rocketed” into second place in the GOP race, it really meant that his polling numbers had moved from 6%-8% to 10%-12%. And now a couple of polls show him leading the GOP pack with 17%-18%. Several obvious points explain this. First, he has sucked all the oxygen out of the room. Mr. Trump likes to produce good copy and that is what has done. He has offended a large and growing constituency, our largest next door neighbor, and the sensibilities of many stripes of Americans – including some very high profile corporations and celebrities who also know how to grab public attention. He has made a career out of being outrageous and he is only doing what does best. Second, this is the summer. Other candidates are just getting started and (for them, at least) this is not the time to be making mistakes and saying the wrong things. Rather, now is the time for the smaller events, the local news coverage, the slow plodding visits and calls to raise money. Third, there is in fact a constituency out there that is alienated and angry. One that is looking for tough talk now, a reassertion of American greatness in the world, an expression of outward resentment – what the great historian Richard Hofstadter once called the “paranoid style in American politics”. Trump has captured and captivated it for the moment. But this is how you get to 17% or 18% (perhaps even 20%) in the polls. That does not win an election even with so many candidates in the race. When well over half of GOP voters say they disapprove of Mr. Trump and will never vote for him, how does he grow? I suppose he can attack gays. There are also Muslims and kids with disabilities. But a lot of that would be duplicative. After all, if you hate Latinos, odds are you already fear sharia law, gay couples, and tax money spent on special education. Besides, does anyone really think Mr. Trump can sustain this outrageous behavior for another year and a half? I for one don’t think we will be talking about him in the fall of 2015. I am remembering Michele Bachman, Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich. There are even more candidates this time around who can be the GOP “Flavor of the Month.” This summer, the circus marquis welcomes you to see and hear the narcissistic bloviator who says the kinds of things you won’t hear anywhere else. But look closely and the same sign will have a banner reading, “Featuring Next Month…” *UNDECLARED* *OTHER* *Seeing Crowd, G.O.P. Donors Holding Back <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/19/us/seeing-crowd-gop-donors-holding-back.html?_r=0> // NYT // Nicholas Confessore & Sarah Cohen – July 18, 2015 * Despite a wealth of choices in a crowded primary field, the vast majority of high-level Republican donors and fund-raisers have not yet backed any candidate financially, magnifying the importance of the coming debates as the presidential hopefuls seek to impress potential backers. Only about a fifth of the 1,000 or so fund-raisers and their spouses who rallied around Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee in 2012, have given money to any of the 2016 candidates, according to a New York Times review of fund-raising records reported by the candidates last week. Those who remain uncommitted — hundreds of volunteer “bundlers” who could collect contributions from their friends and business associates — represent a huge pool of untapped campaign cash, potentially hundreds of millions of dollars, that could remake the primary campaign. Some of the bundlers and donors said they had held back, in part, because the field was the strongest they had seen in years, with several viable contenders representing the party’s different generational and ideological segments. Unlike in 2012, when Mr. Romney dominated fund-raising even as he fought off a series of insurgencies by more populist candidates, the affections of many donors in 2016 are divided among three or four candidates. Others are quietly weighing the impact of Donald J. Trump, who has jumped to the lead in some national polls despite raising almost no money from the party’s establishment. “I haven’t committed to anyone at this point, and I’m not on the verge of committing to anyone,” said Paul E. Singer, a hedge fund manager who is among the most sought-after Republican bundlers in the country, at an investment conference last week. “I think there are a number of candidates that are smart, solid, good potential leaders, leaders and potential leaders.” The slow recruitment of major donors and bundlers is also a function, several donors and Republican leaders said, of the candidates’ early emphasis on raising money for “super PACs,” which tend to be funded by a much smaller pool of extremely wealthy donors. Note: Some contributions to Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham and Rand Paul were made to their Senate campaigns before they became presidential candidates. Data for John Kasich, Scott Walker, Chris Christie and Democrat the Jim Webb is not yet available, so their donors are not known. Source: New York Times analysis of Federal Election Commission data Candidates cannot solicit the unlimited checks that fuel super PACs, and several White House aspirants delayed entering the race this year and spent the winter and spring securing commitments from mega-donors. One result: Vast amounts of money are already flowing into the Republican race, but mostly to super PACs, not candidates. Super PACs and outside groups backing individual Republican candidates have raised about $230 million, while the candidates took in just $64 million through the end of June. “The super PAC donors were more important, to some extent eclipsing the traditional world of hundreds of bundlers,” said Fred Malek, the finance chairman of the Republican Governors Association. “The next quarter is going to be hugely different.” Mr. Romney’s financial operation raised $1 billion in 2012, more than any Republican campaign in history, by combining those who raised money for former President George W. Bush with hundreds of new Republican bundlers, many of them from Wall Street. Some of Mr. Romney’s top bundlers, including the Oklahoma energy executive Harold Hamm and Joseph W. Craft, the chief executive of one of the country’s largest coal producers, have not yet given to a Republican candidate in 2016. The Times analyzed a list of Mr. Romney’s bundlers and their spouses that USA Today assembled in 2012 with data from the Sunlight Foundation, which tracks invitations to political fund-raisers, and the Federal Election Commission, which requires that candidates disclose the names of registered lobbyists who raise money for them. Jeb Bush, the former president’s brother, appears to have won over the largest share of Mr. Romney’s bundlers, with at least 120 donating to his campaign. They include Brian Ballard, a Florida lobbyist, and Dan Loeb, a hedge fund manager who shares Mr. Bush’s passion for education issues. “Jeb’s record as a champion of parent choice and academic excellence is unparalleled,” Mr. Loeb said in an email. “He understands that as a nation we have a responsibility to even the playing field through education so that every child has a chance at the American dream.” Some bundlers are committed to Republicans who did not enter the race until July and have not yet reported any fund-raising numbers, such as Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin. An unknown number may have given to the candidates’ super PACs, which do not have to report their donors until the end of July. Other bundlers, like Jenny Craig, the California-based diet guru, have given to multiple candidates. Still others, like Frank VanderSloot, who runs an Idaho-based health products company, are weighing the prospects of two candidates they like. “Frank VanderSloot is committed to helping both Marco Rubio and Scott Walker get their messages out,” said Tony Lima, a spokesman for Mr. VanderSloot. “He is engaged in that process.” But the scramble for other major bundlers is a boon for candidates not named Bush, several of whom are banking on the debates, which begin Aug. 6, as a chance to prove their mettle and recruit new donors and fund-raisers. Almost 50 Romney bundlers, among them Wayne Berman, an executive at the Blackstone Group, and Harlan Crow, a Texas builder, have already given money to Mr. Rubio, the Florida senator; 14 each have contributed to Senators Ted Cruz of Texas and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina; and at least 10, including the prominent New York hedge fund manager John Paulson, have donated to Carly Fiorina, the former chief executive of Hewlett-Packard. A separate analysis, looking at the top 250 donors to Republican candidates and party organizations, showed a similar phenomenon: Fewer than 100 have contributed to any of the 2016 candidates, according to the Times analysis. Some of them have contributed to more than one candidate, indicating that they are hedging their bets in what is likely to be a volatile and fiercely fought campaign. “I decided to give all of the ones I like the support, just in case they made the primary,” said Elloine M. Clark, a Texas philanthropist who wrote large checks to Mr. Cruz, Mr. Rubio, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky and Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana. “I didn’t want to cut anybody out,” Ms. Clark added. “I want to see some intelligent young people in the race.” The Republican contenders are moving aggressively to tap that money. In recent weeks, some have begun shifting from raising money for their super PACs, which typically depend on a handful of ultra-wealthy donors, to their campaigns, which require the help of hundreds of bundlers and thousands of donors. “As we talk to bundlers around the country, there is still a great pause going on right now,” said Ray Washburne, the finance chairman for Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey. “There’s been no breakaway candidate, and everyone is waiting to see the first debate.” *On Republican Hopefuls’ Checklist: A Super PAC and Lots of Money <http://www.wsj.com/articles/on-republican-hopefuls-checklist-a-super-pac-and-lots-of-money-1437300002> // WSJ // Patrick O’connor and Reid J. Epstein - July 19, 2015* Expanding roles of super PACs, condensed nominating calendar are set to transform 2016 primary campaigns; a well-positioned Jeb Bush WASHINGTON—Some Republican presidential candidates could be in for sticker shock. Right to Rise, the super PAC supporting Jeb Bush, estimates it will cost nearly $60 million just to run 10 days’ worth of advertising in each of the first 30 primary states. And that price tag doesn’t include turning on the lights of campaign offices and filling them with full-time staff dedicated to identifying supporters and getting them out to vote on Election Day. The expanding roles of super PACs and a condensed nominating calendar are fundamentally transforming the way the 2016 primary campaign will be conducted. Gone are the days when campaigns could just scrape together enough money to advertise in Iowa and New Hampshire, and then count on an early victory to spur an infusion of fresh contributions. ‘This is a new world with new rules.’ —Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich Now, more than ever before, a premium is attached to amassing ahead of time enough money for a mad dash through big states. Roughly 62% of the delegates will be allotted in the first 52 days of voting, from February 1 through March 22. Eleven states hold nominating contests on March 1, including Texas with its 20 media markets. “This is a new world with new rules,” said former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who waged an unsuccessful White House bid in 2012. “You have lots of candidates who are going to have super PACs and you’re going to have many more well-funded candidates than you had in 2012.” No Republican is better-positioned for this new era than Mr. Bush. Right to Rise, which ended June with more than $98 million in the bank, is gearing up for a big, multistate advertising push that will allow the group to run ads in Minneapolis and Dallas when the rest of the field is fixated on Manchester and Des Moines. The goal is to build such a big media presence that other camps will struggle to keep pace. “Gov. Bush has said that he is running to win and will do so by communicating his conservative reform agenda across the country,” said Paul Lindsay, a spokesman for Right to Rise. “We are planning a serious and robust independent effort to help him achieve that goal and challenge Hillary Clinton and the Democrats in the general election.” Mr. Bush has raised a combined $114 million when his campaign cash is combined with Right to Rise. While he’s ahead in the GOP money race, other candidates are competitively positioned. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and a trio of outside groups had raised a combined $52 million by the end of June to back his candidacy. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and his aligned super PACs had raised a total of $44 million. Beyond media strategy, the new environment is changing traditional travel itineraries. Candidates are already devoting more attention to later primary contests, making regular stops in some of the 11 states with primaries on March 1 as well as those that vote after them. Tennessee House Speaker Beth Harwell said that four years ago no candidates visited her office. ENLARGE Tennessee House Speaker Beth Harwell said that four years ago no candidates visited her office. PHOTO: ERIK SCHELZIG/ASSOCIATED PRESS Four years ago, no candidates visited Tennessee House Speaker Beth Harwell. This year, Mr. Bush has visited her office twice. Ohio Gov. John Kasich stopped by last week, and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee attended an event for her in the spring. She is attending an event with Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker this week. “Now, in the crowded primary, Tennessee is a plum state,” she said. Three Republicans attended the Georgia Republican convention in June—New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Messrs. Cruz and Rubio—even though the event fell on the same day as Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst’s pig roast in Boone. Messrs. Cruz and Walker are expected back in Georgia next week. “We haven’t seen this level of candidates coming through the state than I can ever remember,” said Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, a Republican who led efforts to create a so-called “SEC Primary” in which a number of Southern states vote on March 1. (The contest is named after college football’s Southeastern Conference.) With 16 Republicans running and the polls muddled, many campaigns are preparing for a longer-than-normal primary because of the strong possibility that several candidates will split the first four nominating contests in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada. “They’re all concluding that you’re going to have three different winners in the first three states,” said Erick Erickson, the conservative pundit who helped organize a forum for GOP candidates in early August in Atlanta that effectively replaces the once-dominant Iowa Straw Poll. “March 1 is when you’re going to narrow it down to one or two.” Because delegates will be allotted to candidates based on their percentage of the vote until March 15, there is a chance the nomination remains up-for grabs even after March 1. And the tight timeline means it will be difficult for an underfunded candidate, like former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum was in 2012, to score an early win and collect enough money to get up on the air in those March 1 media markets. Right to Rise spent weeks compiling advertising rates for individual media markets in all 30 states that vote between Feb. 1 and March 22. They put the cost of running ads for 10 days on the radio and on cable, broadcast and satellite television in each state at $57 million. That total includes $8.4 million for Texas alone. The actual costs are bound to be much higher because television advertising rates are likely to skyrocket with so many groups competing for time, including the Democratic candidates. Mrs. Clinton’s campaign is already reserving time on stations, as are other candidates. TV stations must give candidates a low rate, but supply-and-demand will dictate the cost for super PACs. In 2012, Republican nominee Mitt Romney’s super PAC was charged $3,600 to air three 30-second ads during one New Hampshire program; the Romney campaign paid half that for the same time. The risk for all these candidates is that the wealthy benefactors financing these groups may cut them off if they don’t catch on in the earliest voting states. Even those Republicans with the most money may struggle to compete in March if they lose every contest in February. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani famously flamed out in 2008 when his campaign opted not to compete in Iowa, New Hampshire or South Carolina. “There are more super PACs that will have the funding to compete deeper into the calendar and that will give candidates the option to stay in the race longer,” said Carl Forti, who ran the super PAC for 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney. “But you can’t underestimate momentum, and the press coverage that will come from winning an early state can minimize the advantage of money.” *GOP contenders court evangelical vote in Iowa <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/republican-presidential-contenders-court-evangelical-vote-iowa/> // AP – July 18, 2015 * Republican presidential contenders seeking to woo evangelical voters are making their case for conservative social issues at a gathering expected to attract thousands of potential Iowa caucus-goers. Ten candidates are scheduled to appear Saturday in Ames at the annual Family Leadership Summit. No one seeking the GOP nomination has emerged as a clear favorite among evangelical voters. “They understand that this base has been very influential in past caucuses,” said Bob Vander Plaats, president of the Family Leader, the conservative organization sponsoring the event. Vander Plaats, who has not endorsed any candidate in the 2016 race, expressed concern that the Christian conservative vote might be split up between multiple candidates, diluting its impact. “The goal would be in this summit, and any subsequent venue or event, that we would start recognizing a leader we could unite around and champion – and try to get the person across the goal line,” he said. Scheduled to attend are Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson and reality TV personality Donald Trump. During the daylong event, the candidates will be questioned on stage by political consultant Frank Luntz. Iowa’s evangelical voters traditionally influence the state’s first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses because they tend to be organized and participate. Christian conservatives backed the winners of the last two caucuses, Mike Huckabee in 2008 and Rick Santorum in 2012, but neither was the eventual nominee. Former Iowa Republican Party Chairman Matt Strawn said it was likely too early for a leader to emerge among Christian conservatives. He also noted that some of the candidates may have a wider draw. “Not only are there considerable options within the Christian conservative lane, but there are also those in that lane that demonstrate appeal to a broader base,” he said. *GOP's 2016 ad war slowly heating up <http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/18/politics/election-2016-gop-tv-ad/> // CNN // Tom LoBianco – July 18, 2015 * Dollar days at the local Ford dealer are about to get pushed out by heartwarming tales of Gov. John Kasich's mailman father and Gov. Rick Perry's humble start as an Eagle Scout. The stories candidates want to tell about their everyman roots, played out in gauzy, 30-second blips, are about to take over airwaves in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada. There are 15 candidates so far officially seeking the Republican nomination. And every one of them wants to get on the air. Only the top 10 contenders, as determined by an average of national polls, will make it on stage for the first Republican debate, just a few weeks from now, and candidates are scrambling to make the cut. "I am tired of hyphenated Americans. We are not Indian-Americans or African-Americans, or Asian Americans, we're all Americans," intones Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, in his own twist on the typical candidate introduction spot, which features clips of his family. Jindal has been pacing himself on TV throughout Iowa for more than a month now. Jindal, Perry and Kasich didn't crack 5% support among Republicans in the most recent CNN / ORC poll, released late in June. So far, the top tier is holding back. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, whose supporters touted an eye-popping $114 million haul, and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who formalized his candidacy this week, have yet to begin unloading on-air. Sen. Marco Rubio, who's sitting at the front of the GOP pack with Bush and Walker, made a surprise move last month, spending $10 million to flood the airwaves -- not now, but beginning in November, in the thick of the primary fight. According to federal filings for WMUR in New Hampshire, Rubio will grace "Live with Kelly and Michael" and "The View" through the morning, before book-ending the mid-day news. Then the afternoon is booked with spots airing with "General Hospital," "The Chew" and "Who Wants to be a Millionaire." Finally, ABC primetime viewers get their final dose of Rubio during the nightly news and "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" Kasich's supporters paid for a $1.7 million Hail Mary that went up on air last weekend in New Hampshire. In it, the often-blunt and sometimes prickly veteran politico talks about his upbringing over a light piano soundtrack and clips from smalltown America. "My dad carried mail on his back. They called him 'John the Mailman.' They loved him because he looked out for everyone in those neighborhoods," Kasich, who has not yet officially announced his candidacy for president, said in the ads. "I learned something from my father: Do your best to look out for other people." And Christie, who's launching a come-from-behind bid in the Granite State, is planning to spend $1.1 million in combined online and on-air advertising beginning next week. For candidates looking to get a leg up, buying up ads early can help them find a foothold in the wide, wide field of big-name Republicans, said Greg Moore, state director for Americans for Prosperity-New Hampshire. The name of the game, he said, is building name identification among possible voters. "If you're trying to catch a wave, people have to know who you are before you grab a surfboard," Moore said. Craig Robinson, editor of The Iowa Republican website and a veteran campaigner, said he's been impressed by the early consistency from Perry and Jindal. "Thus far it's been a Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal kinda air war," Robinson said. "It's been those two who have really been on TV and have had a prolonged presence." The question for both, however, will be whether they can maintain their pace throughout the year, he said. The stakes, in the Republican pack, are holding onto territory and even carving a slice of land, at least one large enough to appear on stage for the first Republican debates. "For Perry, he needs to hold onto his debate spot. For Jindal, he needs to break into that," Robinson said. Moore is watching for most ads to start in earnest around September, when schools are back in and families have returned from vacation. Once airtime in Manchester has been snatched up, look for the candidates (and their affiliated super PACs) to begin buying in the Boston market, which covers southern New Hampshire. Mike Schreurs, a veteran Republican buyer in Iowa who has advised Sen. Chuck Grassley since 1974, noted that some candidates haven't had to spend heavily yet because they're already getting plenty of exposure on their own, through "earned media." Others, like retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, have been making effective use of radio advertising, Schreurs said. Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina could be the next candidate hitting the radio. Full-blown political saturation of the airwaves hasn't happened yet, but Schreurs noted that could change in a minute once one of the big names like Walker or Bush begin unloading on air. "I think that's all going to change soon," he said. *TOP NEWS* *DOMESTIC* *Ku Klux Klan and New Black Panther Party Protest at South Carolina Capitol <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/19/us/ku-klux-klanprotests-at-south-carolina-capitol.html?ref=us> // NYT // Alan Binder – July 18, 2015 * With police officers watching from nearby rooftops and a din of racial slurs heard on the pavement below, members of the Ku Klux Klan and the New Black Panther Party appeared at dueling rallies outside the South Carolina State House on Saturday, eight days after officials here removed the Confederate battle flag from the Capitol grounds. Despite sporadic scuffles and hours of inflammatory rhetoric from white and black demonstrators alike, the authorities largely maintained order and prevented any significant violence. The police made five arrests, and the South Carolina Department of Public Safety estimated that the State House crowd, including onlookers, had at one point swelled to about 2,000 people. They chanted — or at least heard — volleys of incendiary speech and shouts of “white power!” and “black power!” Excerpts From the Confederate Flag Debate in the South Carolina HouseJULY 8, 2015 Bystanders watched people wave flags celebrating Pan-Africanism, the Confederacy and the Nazi Party. And they watched as black demonstrators raised clenched fists, and white demonstrators performed Nazi salutes. Much of the day’s drama was on the south side of the State House, near a statue of former Senator Strom Thurmond, where a few dozen people associated with the Loyal White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan held a demonstration. A Columbia newspaper, The State, reported that it was the first Klan rally outside the State House since the late 1980s. Saturday’s protesters, who were predominantly men, did not don the Klan’s traditional white hoods and robes. Even as they denied being members of a hate group, their message was a relentless one of white supremacy. “This is my country,” one shouted at a group of black onlookers. “My ancestors founded this country!” “Peace is over with,” said William Bader, who said he was a Kentucky resident and the imperial wizard of the Trinity White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan. “There is no peace.” Mr. Bader, who said he planned to wear his Klan regalia for a cross burning on Saturday night, added, “What do I want to see happen? White revolution is the only solution.” But on Saturday afternoon, Mr. Bader and the other demonstrators who championed a vision of white supremacy were vastly outnumbered as they protested for an hour in a barricaded area of the State House grounds and sometimes became involved in angry shouting matches with black people in the crowd. There were physical altercations beyond the barricades, but police officers resolved them quickly. When the protest ended and the white demonstrators began to march away around 4 p.m., state troopers with long guns, as well as a Sheriff’s Department tactical team, helped to clear a path. It barely worked. Hundreds of Klan critics followed the white demonstrators to a nearby parking garage, and the authorities had to block roads so the protesters could leave. One driver, besieged by a crowd of protesters that ran toward the departing vehicles, crashed into a lamppost. Some of the white people who circulated in the crowd before the Klan rally said they were drawn to the protests by a blend of curiosity and support for preserving Southern history. “We’re not allowed to have this as a heritage,” Jerry Anderson, a 49-year-old white man who drove here from northwest Georgia, said as he gestured toward another man’s Confederate battle flag. “But they can fly theirs, and they can say what they want to, and it’s O.K.” Mr. Anderson said he had never attended a Klan event, adding: “I’ve never had a reason to go to one. But they take that away and holler that we’re the racists, so, yeah, I’m here.” By attending, people like Mr. Anderson defied Gov. Nikki R. Haley, a Republican, who on Thursday asked South Carolinians to keep “away from the disruptive, hateful spectacle members of the Ku Klux Klan hope to create over the weekend.” Earlier on Saturday, a rally organized by Black Educators for Justice, a Florida-based group with ties to the former director of the New Black Panther Party, attracted a smaller crowd and a far less conspicuous police presence. Among the speakers was the chairman of the New Black Panther Party, Hashim Nzinga, who made little mention of the June 17 massacre of nine black people at Charleston’s Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church. Instead, he argued that blacks must offer renewed and vigorous resistance to what he regards as generations of oppression. “Do what you need to do now before your coffin,” Mr. Nzinga said as a sign nearby urged “death to the K.K.K.” Mr. Nzinga found a receptive crowd, including Charles Goins, a 36-year-old truck driver who held the red, black and green flag of Pan-Africanism. Mr. Goins flatly and frequently said he did not expect the day’s rallies to aid in race relations, but he said they could inspire blacks in South Carolina to demand greater equality. “If anything, this will unify black people because we’re tired of being stepped on. We’re tired of being pushed around,” he said. “This is not the ’50s or the ’60s.” But the crowds, which brought downtown Columbia traffic to a halt on a sweltering day, eventually dissipated, especially once the Klan supporters had been escorted from the area. *INTERNATIONAL* *ISIS Says It Carried Out Bombing That Killed 100 in Iraq <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/19/world/middleeast/isis-says-it-carried-out-bombing-that-killed-100-in-iraq.html?ref=world> // NYT // Anne Barnard – July 18, 2015 * The Islamic State group has claimed responsibility for a bombing in eastern Iraq, and Iraqi officials on Saturday said the death toll had risen to 100, with 20 more missing and more than 100 wounded. The bomb tore through a marketplace on Friday as shoppers prepared for a major Muslim holiday in Khan Bani Saad, a mostly Shiite town about 12 miles from Baquba, the capital of Diyala Province. Government troops and Shiite militias months ago wrested back parts of the province from the Islamic State, also known as ISIS and Daesh, its Arabic acronym. The attack was a blow to the unity and optimism that Iraqi officials have sought to project as they mount a new offensive to drive the militants out of Anbar Province, to the west. The government has struggled to oust the group, more than a year after Islamic State fighters seized large areas of northern and western Iraq. In a statement claiming responsibility for the blast, the Islamic State, which has often singled out Shiites as targets, declared that the bombing was revenge for what it called a massacre of Sunnis in the town of Hawija, farther north. The statement may have been referring to an episode in March, during a battle that eventually drove the Islamic State from the central city of Tikrit. Residents of Hawija reported at the time that dozens of Islamic State fighters had been killed by their commanders for trying to flee the battlefield. It is not unusual for conflicting accounts of clashes to emerge. There have also been cases of indiscriminate killings by some Shiite militias in areas that they have taken back from the Islamic State. The militant group also claimed in its statement that the bomb had hit “a gathering of Shiite militias.” But Iraqi officials said that many civilians, including women and children, were killed or wounded in the blast. The Islamic State, which follows an extremist interpretation of Sunni Islam, views Shiites as apostates and has often attacked Shiite civilians. Its statement declared that it used three tons of explosives to kill and wound more than 180 “apostates.” Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said in a statement that the Islamic State was attacking civilians in response to recent government advances. “The terrorist criminal gangs of Daesh committed a heinous crime targeting civilians in Khan Bani Saad after the victories achieved by our heroic forces in various places, and the Anbar operation is part of it,” he said. The bomb struck as people were shopping for Eid al-Fitr, the end of the holy month of Ramadan. Sunni Muslims generally celebrated the holiday a day earlier. The police and health officials said that in addition to the dead, at least 133 people were wounded in the blast. Identifying the dead was a painstaking task because many bodies were dismembered, the officials said. It was the most deadly bombing in the area since the American invasion of Iraq in 2003, said Khudhur al-Ubaidi, the secretary of the Diyala provincial council, adding that the death toll was expected to rise because “most of the injured are in critical condition, and more bodies are still under the rubble.” Bombings have been a terrifying commonplace in Iraq since long before the Islamic State existed in its current form. They often struck at Shiite religious gatherings, but also hit marketplaces with shoppers of all sects, throughout the American occupation and the years of sectarian infighting that peaked in 2006 and 2007. In recent years, car bombs and suicide bombs have been the militants’ weapons of choice for attacks in government-held areas. *Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Says Nuclear Deal Won’t Change U.S. Ties <http://www.wsj.com/articles/irans-ayatollah-ali-khamenei-says-nuclear-deal-wont-change-u-s-ties-1437202111> // WSJ // Aresu Eqbali – July 18, 2015 * Iran will uphold its anti-American policies and continue to support regional allies inimical to Western interests, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Saturday, days after Tehran and six world powers struck a landmark nuclear deal that renewed hopes of improved ties between longtime adversaries. “Our policy regarding the arrogant U.S. government will not change,” Mr. Khamenei said in a televised address to mark Eid al-Fitr, the Muslim feast day at the end of the holy month of Ramadan. “We don’t have any negotiations or deal with the U.S. on different issues in the world or the region.” Mr. Khamenei said the country wouldn’t surrender to excessive demands, and vowed not to change Iran’s policy of supporting regional allies that the U.S. and Israel oppose. Iran provides vital support for the Syrian regime, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Shiite militias in Iraq, among other groups. “Whether [the deal is] ratified or not, we will not give up on our friends in the region,” Mr. Khamenei said. The comments were the most detailed from Mr. Khamenei since the nuclear deal was struck Tuesday. The hard-line cleric’s views are being closely watched because he has the final say in most matters of state and could still back out of the agreement. While Mr. Khamenei was equivocal about the deal’s ultimate success, he also hailed it as a win for Iran in a decadelong struggle to preserve its nuclear achievements, including thousands of centrifuges that enrich uranium. He didn’t explicitly reject its provisions, nor did he fully embrace the deal, an ambiguity that appeared to both play to his hard-line base and appeal to Iranians who support the negotiations. A majority of Iranians supported the deal, according to a poll conducted in May by the University of Tehran and IranPoll.com. “After 10 to 12 years of struggle with the Islamic republic, they have no other way today but to tolerate the spinning of a few thousand centrifuges in the country, the continuation of this industry and research and development,” Mr. Khamenei said. Iran’s nuclear deal with six world powers—the U.S., the U.K., France, Germany, Russia and China—puts curbs on its nuclear program in exchange for the removal of sanctions that have reduced its oil exports and hurt its economy. The U.S., the EU and the United Nations imposed the sanctions over suspicions that Iran sought to develop nuclear weapons, a charge Iran has always denied. Mr. Khamenei’s insistence that Iran’s policy toward the U.S. wouldn’t change appeared to run counter to recent suggestions by top government officials that the deal could be a springboard for closer cooperation against common threats, including Islamic State extremists in Iraq and Syria. Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, who spearheaded Iran’s negotiations, said in an Eid message Friday that he hoped the nuclear deal could bring about better regional and international collaboration. President Hassan Rouhani, a pragmatic moderate, has articulated a foreign policy of engagement based on mutual respect since his election in 2013. Mutual distrust between Iran and the U.S. dates to the Iranian revolution in 1979, which ousted the U.S.-backed Shah Reza Pahlavi and ushered in the Islamic government in place today. Chants of “Death to America” have since been a regular refrain during government gatherings and Friday prayers, and hard-liners often refer to the U.S. as “the great Satan,” a phrase coined by Iran’s first Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Despite the nuclear deal’s finalization on Tuesday, it still faces hurdles both in Iran and the U.S. In Iran, the parliament and the Supreme National Security Council, a body over which Mr. Khamenei has control, must sign off. But it is ultimately Mr. Khamenei whose decision counts. The U.S. Congress also has 60 days to weigh in on the deal. If lawmakers pass a resolution disapproving the deal and President Barack Obama vetoes it, a two-thirds majority in the House and Senate is required to override the veto. Mr. Obama can still implement the deal if Congress can’t override his veto. Since the deal was signed, Mr. Obama’s administration has been fending off opposition in Congress while trying to assure the U.S.’s Gulf Arab allies that they won’t be abandoned in Washington’s mending of ties with Tehran. In a speech following the deal, Mr. Obama said the accord wouldn’t resolve all the U.S.’s differences with Iran, and that sanctions imposed over the country’s human rights record would stay in place. But he said the deal also “offers an opportunity to move in a new direction” toward tolerance and peace. The predominantly Sunni Muslim Gulf countries, led by Saudi Arabia, are skeptical of the deal because they see Shiite Iran as their most potent regional rival. Mr. Obama met Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister, Adel al-Jubeir, on Friday to discuss the Iran deal and other regional issues, according to a White House statement.