👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (570 words)
To: Jeffrey Epsteinfleevacationagmail.comj
From: Charles L. Harper Jr.
Sent Sat 5/29/2010 12:16:02 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re:
From: "Charles L. Harper Jr.
Date: May 29, 2010 8:12:19 AM EDT
To: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]>
Subject: Re:
hi Jeffrey,
Great to hear from you. I was just up at MIT this week and met with Seth Lloyd (on
Wednesday) and Scott Aaronson (on Thursday) on the "Cryptography in Nature"
small research conference project. These interactions were fantastic. Both think
the topic is wonderful and innovative and has promise. In fact I was somewhat
astonished by their enthusiasm and the depth of adventure they see in the topic.
The situation is very good. I now have a list of great names (about 25) including
a number of names of young scholars selected for extraordinary future promise.
The problem will be to narrow down the list to the 8 pr 10 we want.
I did contact Max Tegmark about a month ago to propsc the essay contest approach we
discussed. He and his colleagues offered support but did not think that FQX
should do it. Reasons they gave were that they saw the topic as too narrow and
too technical compared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible
that the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via
Templeton support to become even more so via Epstein-related sponsorship of
prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable in view of their
agenda to build relationships with other donors, though ironically what you and I
are working on would develop a nice topically-rich and deep program linkage with
another major donor. My general advice in this matter is that we should build a
relationship slowly and build trust. Seth has suggested Max as a key person to
invite to the meeting.
So basically just this week I have been able to get the key information needed to set the
invitations. I am now at Princeton for 4 days but not in an academic capacity. My
daughter Becky will graduate in Astrophysics and I am attending my 30th reuinion
and my wife's father, James Billington (the Librarian of Congress) is attending his
60th.
Within two weeks I can put together an annotated "final" long list of potential invitees for
you to select
from. Since we would not do an essay contest via FQX, the organizing cycle can be faster
to do the meeting.
EFTA_R1_01480895
EFTA02416498
I hope you are doing well and look forward to planning a worthwhile event with you.
Again, I am delighted to have gotten such very string affirmation, input and scientific enthusiasm
from both Seth and Scott. You have very brilliantly suggested a profound topical focus
area. Super!!
Allbest,
Charles Harper
Sent from my iPhone
On May 29, 2010, at 6:00 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote:
I have been swamped. how do we move forward with the ficq
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
EFTA_R1_01480896
EFTA02416499
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
1685cdb011a169eab8add270c51b1cedc2d24ed67dda303f9cda0037a81875ff
Bates Number
EFTA02416498
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0