📄 Extracted Text (541 words)
Qevonshires solicitors
Annette Witheridge Our Ref: PTIN_CL1014218705
The Mail on Sunday
5 March 2011
Dear Annette
Ghislaine Maxwell
I represent Ghislaine Maxwell. I am in receipt of an email you sent to Brett Jaffe late
yesterday calling for a response by noon today.
I have seen the article published in today's Daily Mail.
The allegations made by against Ghislaine Maxwell (as at points 1 - 14 of
your email) are all entirely baseless, utterly false and without merit.
Ghislaine Maxwell has never been contacted by any police force or other law enforcement
agency in connection with any allegations made against Jeffrey Epstein. She has absolutely
no connection to the criminal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and was neither approached by
the defence or prosecution in that matter.
Ghislaine Maxwell has not been named as a party in any proceedings relating to Jeffrey
Epstein. Further, no one has at any time even written to Ghislaine Maxwell making any
claims against her. It is quite extraordinary that if what is saying is her
genuine held belief, that she did not add Ghislaine Maxwell as a party to any claim or even
write to Ghislaine Maxwell putting her on notice of any such claim.
The only legal process that Ghislaine Maxwell has ever received is a subpoena which was
served on her and which she was not required to answer.
One of the lawyers primarily responsible for promoting allegations against Jeffrey Epstein
was Scott Rothstein. In June 2010, Mr Rothstein was sentenced to 50 years imprisonment
for his involvement in what is reported to have been the largest ever fraud in Florida, a
US$1.2 billion ponzi scheme. He is also the primary defendant in a civil law suit based on
his fraud in which the claim is US$100 billion. He is a man without any shred of credibility.
He is a proven liar and someone who has sought to manipulate the law to his own
advantage. He is reported as being connected with the making of false claims in relation to
Jeffrey Epstein.
Lexcel
A kb of owners is oboe lot inspection si ow oboes. This km does nol semi avec° by eleclionic meila Maw*
Tom hoe is moidatee by Ma Solicsors Redo/won Astionty.
EFTA01085326
has previously made unsubstantiated allegations for sexual misconduct. On
at least one other occasion, she claimed to have been sexually assaulted and the
government declined to prosecute the case "due to the victim's lack of credibility".
[She also has criminal convictions for offences of dishonesty]
allegations are nothing other than an attempt to seek additional financial
windfall by generating publicity and thereby seeking a degree of fame.
Ghislaine Maxwell will be commencing proceedings against the Daily Mail in connection with
the article they have published today unless a full retraction and apology are tendered on
acceptable terms.
You will obviously appreciate the substantial damage that Ghislaine Maxwell will suffer from
the publication of allegations of this nature. If you choose to publish any material you should
ensure that you make it clear at the outset of the article and in its heading that the allegations
made by are vehemently denied and that action is going to be taken against
the Daily Mail.
Yours sincerely
Philip Barden
Partner
Page 2
EFTA01085327
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
168e957bddf83574b087907a1ab2956d20708734625b12252ff11e8a9f98e0ce
Bates Number
EFTA01085326
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0