podesta-emails

podesta_email_01698.txt

podesta-emails 4,645 words email
D6 P17 V16 P24 V11
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Thanks John, for you willingness to get to Senator Harkin to clear things up about DOL, NOW would you please try to get our for Platform for Disability Rights Change at the White House to President Obama too? I know you'll do all you can to help do the right thing. You always do! Thanks! -- Nancy Subject: ADAPT 38 ARRESTED OUTSIDE WHITEHOUSE -- Platform for Disability Rights Change a ________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:18 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: ADAPT 38 ARRESTED OUTSIDE WHITEHOUSE -- Platform for Disability Rights Change a YES, ELDON; THOSE WHO GOT ARRESTED TODAY ARE OUR HEROS! Here's more from us at ADAPT -- Nancy Welcome to ADAPT!<http://www.adapt.org/main> > Whitehouse2013 A Platform for Disability Rights Change at the White House As we review President Obama’s first term, ADAPT is deeply disappointed by his failure to keep his promises to the Disability Community and make substantive progress supporting the integration of people with disabilities in the community. As we look forward into his second term, ADAPT urges the Disability Community to hold him accountable for these failures but also to demand that he address the critical issues we are raising. Today, ADAPT demands that President Obama… KEEP HIS PROMISES to the Disability Community by: * Issuing a statement that he supports the development of legislation that would finally end Medicaid’s institutional bias and assure that people with disabilities have a community-based alternative to institutional placement; and * Instructing the Office of Management and Budget to return the proposed rules implementing changes to the “companionship exemption” to the Department of Labor and require DOL to follow Executive Order 13563 and fully involve the Disability Community in the development of these rules, or alternatively – implement the compromise proposed by ADAPT and the National Council on Independent Living. EFFECTIVELY ENGAGE the Disability Community by: * Hiring staff from the Disability Community in the Office of Public Engagement who can create and coordinate direct dialogue between the Obama Administration and Americans with disabilities; and * Hiring staff from the Disability Community for the White House Domestic Policy Council who can assure that the voice of the Disability Community is included in the domestic policy-making process in the White House. LEAD THE COUNTRY in ending the injustice of institutionalization by: * Designating Vice President Biden as an “Ambassador for Community Living” and sending him on an Olmstead Anniversary Tour where he visits ten model programs for transitioning people with disabilities into the community and convenes round-tables in ten states to support them in developing effective systems for truly integrating people with disabilities; and * Issuing an Executive Order that acknowledges inhumane, outmoded and expensive warehousing of people in nursing facilities and other institutions and implements specific steps to end this practice. Of course, much of the work to FREE OUR PEOPLE must be done by the Federal agencies. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES The President should instruct HHS Secretary Sebelius to: * Identify a process for minimizing the negative impact of state budget cuts on Long Term Services and Supports when the maintenance of effort requirement under the Affordable Care Act expires; * Establish Olmstead benchmarks for states to assure that they adhere to minimum standards for providing effective community-based alternatives to institutions and withhold Medicaid funding from states that fail to meet such benchmarks; * Work with the Department of Justice to align the complaint processes used by the HHS Office for Civil Rights and the Department of Justice so complaints to eliminate the need for DOJ to re-investigate complaints that have already been investigated by HHS; * Assure that implementation of managed care or other changes in Medicaid at the state level promote community living and self-direction and do not undercut Medicaid recipients’ rights to appeal decisions and have appropriate hearing rights including aid continuing; * Work with the ADAPT to strengthen the Community First Choice (CFC) Option and assure that CFC implementation lives up to its promise. * Develop a process to assure that HHS reviews its policies and procedures to identify how it can assure compliance with the ADA’s integration mandate; HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT The President should instruct HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan to: * Immediately disseminate the Olmstead guidance that was shared with ADAPT in January 2013 without any weakened language; * Implement an improved system to track nursing facility transition vouchers to assure that these vouchers continue to be used for this purpose when they are returned; * Include people with disabilities in nursing facilities and institutions within the definition of “homeless”; * Develop a package of pre-approved policies, procedures and other necessary documentation that housing authorities can simply adopt in order to implement preferences or set-asides for people with disabilities seeking community living; and * Develop and distribute guidance that individuals with disabilities who are seeking to leave institutions and live in the community must be granted a reasonable accommodation that allows them to receive the next available voucher in order to transition. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE The President should instruct Attorney General Eric Holder to: * Immediately pursue Olmstead enforcement addressing the institutionalization of people with disabilities – of all ages – in nursing facilities; * Instruct the Civil Rights Division to meet with representatives of ADAPT and the National Council on Independent Living to develop a plan to address the concern of retaliation at the state and local level which is under-cutting the availability of supports from this unique network of disability-led organizations; and * Meet with members of ADAPT to better understand the disability community’s concerns about the Olmstead implications of Department of Labor’s proposed changes to the “companionship exemption” and include ADAPT in a meeting with the Office of Management and Budget to address this issue. In a message dated 4/22/2013 5:02:54 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: HERO'S!! A Platform for Disability Rights Change at the White House ________________________________ From: [email protected] Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:16:18 -0400 Subject: ADAPT Disability Scoop -- 38 ARRESTED OUTSIDE WHITEHOUSE To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ________________________________ From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: 4/22/2013 1:49:29 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time Subj: Disability Scoop [https://a.gfx.ms/i_safe.gif][https://a.gfx.ms/i_safe.gif] Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T ________________________________ From: Janine Bertram <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:10:13 -0700 To: [email protected] Smock<[email protected]>; Adam Ballard<[email protected]>; Sarah Watkins<[email protected]>; Bruce Darling<[email protected]>; Bob Kafka<[email protected]>; Mark Johnson<[email protected]>; Marsha Katz<[email protected]> Subject: Disability Scoop http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2013/04/22/disability-arrested-white-house/17776/ = -----Original Message----- From: John Podesta <[email protected]> To: Nancybk <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Apr 22, 2013 5:46 pm Subject: Re: John Podesta, can you please help us get this to Senator Harkin I'll see what I can do. Probably tough given previous meeting.  From: [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 5:01:25 PM To: John Podesta; [email protected] Subject: John Podesta, can you please help us get this to Senator Harkin From: [email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected] Sent: 4/22/2013 1:57:18 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time Subj: Re: Saving Independent Living As We Know It from the DOL Rules Dear Bruce, can you please advise me on how to disabuse Senator Harkin's office that this is in any way the position of Consumer Directed IHSS Consumers in California. As you know so well, we had our own advocates meeting with Donna Aguilar of the Office of Management budget to let her know about how destructive the negative unintended consequences of the DOL rules deal well rules would be here in California and the widespread misery that would be created on the day it would be enacted.  I will attach -mails during below of our communications to Donna Aguilar of OMB beneath your e-mail, so that Andrew Imperato might convey our true sentiments to the Senator. Nancy Becker Kennedy Join the IHSS Consumers Union on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/groups/IHSS.ConsumersUnion/ "Nothing About Us Without Us!" (Latin: "Nihil de nobis, sine nobis") is a slogan used to communicate the idea that no policy should be decided by any representative without the full and direct participation of members the group(s) affected by that policy. This involves national, ethnic, disability based or other groups that are often thought to be marginalized from political, social, and economic opportunities.  In a message dated 4/20/2013 5:04:29 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: Nancy,   Harkin's office facilitated a meeting with ADAPT, SEIU and AFSCME yesterday.  SEIU spoke at length how "their California members in consumer direction" WANTED this change to the companionship exemption!  We pushed back, but CA folks may want to correct that impression. Bruce  Thank you Ms. Echols.  Would you be so kind as to forward the background materials, Emails strings on content , OpEd and panel information I sent you to Ms. Aguilar.  Thank you. -- Nancy Becker Kennedy In a message dated 4/5/2013 7:17:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: Good Morning Nancy, The person who chaired your call is Brenda Aguilar. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 9:36 PM To: Echols, Mabel E. Subject: May I know the name of the woman we met with today, thursday  thank you.-- nancy In a message dated 4/4/2013 2:51:11 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,[email protected] writes: Deborah Miles, IHSS Consumer, Board Member of the Personal Assistance Services Council Of Los Angeles County, Member of the PASC Managed-Care Committee, IHSS Consumer Union/CD-R Californians for Disability Rights  661 - 264 9228 Nancy Becker Kennedy, IHSS Consumer, Member of the Personal Assistance Services Council of Los Angeles County, Chair of the PASC Managed-Care Committee, IHSS Consumers Union/CD-R, ADAPT, 323 221 2757 Arnold Arbizzo, IHSS Consumer, Member of the IHSS ConsumersUnion/CD-R 562 929 6923 Bonnie Hagy, IHSS Consumer, Vice President of the Polio Survivors Association 626-359-8628 Ellyn Kearney, IHSS Consumer, Pastoral Counselor, IHSS Consumer Union/CD-R 626-399-8775, 626 793 - 8775 home Tony Anderson Executive Director The Arc California and Director of the Collaboration for The Arc UCP in California, [email protected]  Donna Calame  Executive Director of the San Francisco Public Authority (cannot attend, out of country -- will make her comments in writing when she returns.) From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: 3/31/2013 12:14:19 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time Subj: Revised Oped Unintended Consequences: Collateral Damage of the Homecare Rules  Dear Editor; In your editorial, "Homecare Rules in the Homestretch," you fail to understand the reality of living on government funded Medicaid and the Russian Roulette pistol aimed at the heads of the Seniors, People with Disabilities and our Home Care Workers who depend on it, every year when budgets are cut. Although overtime pay would be great for IHSS providers, in publicly funded Medicaid programs, states that are cutting IHSS (In Home Supportive Services) are not likely to provide overtime pay and will instead most likely cut hours worked above  160 hours a month for any one provider.  There is a big move to push through these Department of Labor rules as written right now with no consideration of how they'll really play out in the homes of Seniors and People with Disabilities and their Caregivers in New York and California where people have over 159 hours of IHSS a month. I know of a proud union member, a mother over 60, who has multiple disabilities of her own and takes care of her adult son with athetoid cerebral palsy who will see her household income of about $2520 a month in California drop to $1431, as her hours are cut from 280 hours a month to 160 hours. She doesn't have the stamina to supplement her income with more jobs and she has trouble finding other caregivers because her son cannot be understood very well by others.  The union has taken over $40 a month from her for check each month to lobby for what will cut her income by a pretty big fraction. 70% of the caregivers in California are family members whose households stay intact with IHSS. A cut in hours can threaten their ability to stay in their homes. Seniors and People with Disabilities with Live in Caregivers will be uprooted as well. Jerry Brown just got done settling a lawsuit trying to cut the IHSS program in California by 20% and settled for cutting it by about 8 percent.  Do you really think he's going to take time and a half for over 50,000 providers?  His representative on an Olmsted conference said they wouldn't. When I was in the Young Socialist Alliance in college, before I had my accident, I believed in theories in a vacuum.  Then I became disabled and saw how these things work out on a real-life level.  In California, we have the most highly advanced In-Home Supportive Services program, and the reason it was so good is that the disabled person received money to find somebody and all of that money went directly to the caregiver.  The attendant got all the bang for the buck.  And while ADAPT American Disabled for Attendant Programs Today  was fighting to get In Home Care, this wonderful program to all the states, they came up with things like "Money Follows the Person" and "Community First Choice Option" where that money continued to go to the disabled person to pay directly to their caregiver with no middleman. But suddenly all kinds of profiteering is going on as big bad corporations and yes even sometimes big bad unions behaviors are immerging as monied interests smell a beautiful dollar to be made in the graying of the baby boomers.  On a good day the union is our greatest blessing on a bad day they are our greatest curse.  The only way to come up with a reasonable solution that takes everyone's welfare into account is to sit down and work it out.  I think what's been most frightening to me in all of this is the ease with which able-bodied regard People with Disabilities as invisible.  The SEIU would not even sit down at the table with People with Disabilities to work out a compromise.  Would this happen to a person of color?  Are we the last population to be seen as a fraction of a person -- or a person who is really there at all? People have been making industries of people with disabilities for decades, in the nursing home industry, the charity industry, and now the medical industrial complex and the unions too on a bad day.  People from ADAPT clawed our ways out of nursing homes that were profiteering off of us and now we have to fight against the nursing agency industry, managed care corporations, and even at times a union that is so out of touch with its rank and file providers needs that it would create three crappy jobs from one not so good one in order to collect two or three union dues on a one house.  It is the people disabilities and rank-and-file providers, who are in a symbiotic relationship, huddled together to keep industries and unions from objectifying us and moving us around like "furniture" in their business plans.  You can choose to be naïve and come up with lovely little fairy lands in your own mind, but make no mistake, your naïveté will be paid for by the rank-and-file workers whose pay will be cut badly and people with disabilities who will go back to nursing homes. The ADAPT-NCIL compromise would simply eliminate the exemption for third party employers, treating Medicaid consumers in consumer directed programs (including public authorities, fiscal intermediaries and agencies with choice) the same as private employers so they can still use the existing exemption.  According to the DOL analysis, this change - alone - would eliminate the companionship exemption for 70% of home care workers.  It covers all of the "bad players" and concerns raised in the DOL analysis that exist in traditional home care while minimizing the negative impact on people with disabilities and preventing the unexpected consequences such changes would have on real live people in Medicaid funded programs.  Where were our points of view in this newspaper? In the DOL discussions?  Why include us?  It’s only our bodies, our civil rights, our freedom from living lives akin to political prisoners in iinstitutions! If anyone had any respect for people with disabilities we would have included us in the discussion. Nancy Becker Kennedy Appointed Member Since Its Inception Los Angeles County Public Authority Board PASC  that oversees the In Home Care of over 200,000 Seniors and People with Disabilities Join the IHSS Consumers Union on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/groups/IHSS.ConsumersUnion/ "Nothing About Us Without Us!" (Latin: "Nihil de nobis, sine nobis") is a slogan used to communicate the idea that no policy should be decided by any representative without the full and direct participation of members the group(s) affected by that policy. This involves national, ethnic, disability based or other groups that are often thought to be marginalized from political, social, and economic opportunities. From: "Donna Calame" <[email protected]> Date: March 3, 2013, 10:33:48 AM PST To: <[email protected]> Subject: Home Care Rules in the Home StretchWhat this NY Times editorial fails to acknowledge is that California has had the most generous home care program for poor people in the United States for several decades - In-Home Supportive Services. Today, IHSS pays about 380,000 home care workers - 72 percent of whom are family members - to serve about 440,000 people.  Throughout that time, the workers have been paid minimum wage. The issue in California is how the OVERTIME regs will affect both IHSS consumers and workers. Neither your analysis nor that of the DOL has considered that as drafted these regs will significantly damage this consumer-directed program. Yes. The state of California AND many IHSS consumers and workers oppose these regs on monetary grounds. Because they point toward both service reductions and less income for households where family workers provide the assistance. We are not part of the home care AGENCY industry world. But none of you have truly understood the uniqueness of IHSS and the unnecessary damage these regs will perpetrate.  Donna CalameExecutive DirectorSan Francisco IHSS Public Authority832 Folsom St., 9th floorSan Francisco, CA 94107Direct line:  415.593.8111www.sfihsspa.org The call-in number is:  202-395-6392; code 3862485.Dear Ms. Echols, please forgive me for the informality of sending you this e-mail string, but I think it will give you some background on some of the concerns those of us who are and advocate for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities in California: The IHSS Consumers Union, The San Francisco Public Authority, Members of the Managed-Care Committee of the Los Angeles County Public Authority and the Arc of California, the largest membership association for all people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families would very much like to speak with you.  We have serious concerns regarding the unintended negative consequences that could occur for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities in the state of California if the Department of Labor rules regarding the Companionship Exemption are applied to publicly funded Medicaid programs. Thank you for your dedication in serving our country. Sincerely Nancy Becker Kennedy Join the IHSS Consumers Union on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/groups/IHSS.ConsumersUnion/ "Nothing About Us Without Us!" (Latin: "Nihil de nobis, sine nobis") is a slogan used to communicate the idea that no policy should be decided by any representative without the full and direct participation of members the group(s) affected by that policy. This involves national, ethnic, disability based or other groups that are often thought to be marginalized from political, social, and economic opportunities. In a message dated 3/25/2013 2:20:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,[email protected] writes: Thanks we agree. I'll incorporate into our notices. Tony Sent from my iPhone On Mar 25, 2013, at 2:16 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: Click here: The Center for Disability Rights - Free Our People From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: 3/23/2013 5:58:27 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time Subj: Disability Community vs DOL From California: Although overtime pay would be great for IHSS providers, in publicly funded Medicaid programs, states that are cutting IHSS are not likely to provide overtime pay and will instead most likely cut hours worked above 159 hours a month for any one provider.  There is a big move to push through these Department of Labor rules as written right now with no consideration of how they'll really play out in the homes of Seniors and People with Disabilities and their Caregivers in New York and California where people have over 160 hours of IHSS a month.  In California where 70% of caregivers are family providers, IHSS makes it possible for families to stay intact when they have a senior family member or a family members with a disability, who needs in-home care.  These families could see their household income drop dramatically.  Significantly disabled people with over 160 hours could lose loyal live-in and live out caregivers they've had for decades, because their work hours will be cut below the money they need to live.  Or people with severe disabilities may not be able to get providers to help them when one of the providers needs to leave, because the remaining providers will be in danger working overtime. The unintended consequences of this unbalanced approach to the way private and public in-home supportive services are paid could lead to widespread misery in publicly funded In-Home Supportive Services.  Senior and Disability Rights Advocates were not included in discussions where these Department of Labor rules were developed.  Now, the National Council on Disability is trying to explain this to those who can make a difference.  Their letter is printed below.  The NCIL/ADAPT compromise could be a win-win solution for everyone, where privately funded agencies would have different rules than in publicly funded Medicaid In-Home Supportive Services in states where finite revenues determine what can be paid. "Our compromise creates a win-win solution, covers 70% of attendants and allows us all to be at the table for further discussion,"  says Bruce Darling of CDR ADAPT. Below see the Letter from the National Council on Disability about these possible negative unintended consequences. http://www.ncd.gov/publications/2013/03192013/  The Disability and Senior communities and the rank-and-file IHSS providers in New York and California do not seem to of been fully informed or permitted to give input about the impact of this law as written.  If after reading this letter, you feel the Office of Management and Budget should delay changing these rules until they consult with Disability And Senior Communities and make sure it won't cut the number of hours providers are permitted to work in publicly funded programs, then sign the petition at the link above or make your comments here at Capitol Hill's Congress blog http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/286539-act-now-on-fair-wages-for-home-care-aides and DIRECT letters to  [email protected]  As more sign-on letters are developed for the Office of Management and Budget OMB, we will give you other opportunities to voice your opinions, but time is running short before these proposed laws will become what we try to live with.  United in win-win solutions for Home Care Workers and Seniors and Persons with Disabilities! http://www.ncd.gov/publications/2013/03192013/ Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T "The disability community is deeply concerned that the proposed changes will have a negative impact on people with disabilities, consumer direction and our attendants.  Medicaid rates are not going to increase so attendant hours will be capped.  DOL - in its own analysis - identified that instutionalization was an outcome of these rules.  Are you aware of our concerns?  Do you really think Medicaid rates are going to increase to coveer the cost of time-and-a-half?  Appreciate your insights as to how this would - practically - move forward. -- Bruce Darling ADAPT" Check outwww.DOLoffMYbody.org to get a feel for how these proposed rules impact people with disabilities. Join the IHSS Consumers Union on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/groups/IHSS.ConsumersUnion/ "Nothing About Us Without Us!" (Latin: "Nihil de nobis, sine nobis") is a slogan used to communicate the idea that no policy should be decided by any representative without the full and direct participation of members the group(s) affected by that policy. This involves national, ethnic, disability based or other groups that are often thought to be marginalized from political, social, and economic opportunities.   From Michael Condon -- STOP THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES My name is Michael Condon I'm a disabled Veteran, paralyzed from the neck down for the last 40 years. I live in San Diego, CA, in a home I rent,and I am assisted by a caregiver paid for by In-Home Supported Services (IHSS). IHSS employs nearly 400,000 caregivers across the State. Almost 50% of these caregivers currently work more than 40 hrs/week. In addition, 70% of the IHSS caregivers in this program care for family members, many of whom require protective supervision (24 /7 care). The State has neither the funds nor the inclination to pay overtime. This will put me, and hundreds of thousands like me, at risk of institutionalization. Because our caregivers will be limited to a 40 work week, I will be forced to have multiple caregivers while there are already not enough to meet the current need. Please do not institute the DOL regs. requiring overtime. The disabled, elderly and blind on...this program would love to have their caregivers receive time and a half, but that will not happen. What will happen (unintended consequences) instead, the caregivers hours will be cut driving many deeper into poverty. The caregiver loses, the senior/disabled loses and the Unions almost double their membership dues. Sincerely. Michael Condon This is why a 40 hour work week mandate is bad. It will be financially devastating to 46% of IHSS IP's (190,000 workers)in CA alone.  IF YOU CARE ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO LIVE IN THE COMMUNITY AND OUR CAREGIVERS NOT TO GET THEIR HOURS CUT IN HALF, SHOW US THE MONEY! Click here: Petition | United States Department of Labor: Don't remove the "companion exemption" to the FLSA until money is th Petitioning Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis This petition will be delivered to:United States Department of Labor Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis Senior Policy Advisor, White House Domestic Policy Council Portia Wu Acting Director, Office of Management & Budget Jeffrey Zients Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, White House Nancy-Ann DeParle US Department of Labor Laura McClintock United States Department of Labor: Don't remove the "companion exemption" to the FLSA until money is there. Petition byPhilip BennettBklyn., NY News Home care workers and people we assist may be saved!by Philip Bennett Petition Organizer I ask all who signed my petition to please call the White House (202-456-1414) & ask for the Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). OMB is currently reviewing the FLSA change & is set to release it April 1st. We need to tell OMB to reject it & thereby save home care workers & the people we assist. Comments can be made to OMB through OIRA. The name of the regulation is FLSA Domestic Service Regs (29CFR 552 and the ID at OMB is RIN# 1235-AA05 Unfortunately that phone number is not released to the public so we must call the White House switch board. For more information call me, Philip Bennett: 718-339-0404 And please share my petition with as many people as possible. I love my job & I want to afford to keep doing it & I don't want to see more people forced into nursing homes. Thank you! Please forward to Brenda Aguilar.  Thank you.
👁 1 💬 0
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
18344b3e3d5576227c762e5be5bcc9884ad1e1866bcfd532c16f110a1a0536cb
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!