podesta_email_00336.txt

podesta-emails 34,069 words email

D6 P17 P22 V11 V13

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Round two official Clips from Comms team below and attached. Thanks! *H4A Climate Change Rollout Clips* *July 27, 2015* HRC NATIONAL COVERAGE.................................................................... 2 *Clinton Unveils Far-Reaching Climate Change Plan* // NYT // Trip Gabriel and Coral Denport - July 26, 2015 3 *Hillary Clinton lays out climate change initiative* // WaPo // Vanessa Williams - July 26, 2015 4 *Clinton talks climate change in Iowa — but still won’t talk Keystone* // WaPo // Vanessa Williams – July 27, 2015 5 *Two reasons why Hillary Clinton’s first climate change proposal is much more modest than it sounds* // WaPo // Philip Bump – July 27, 2015............................................................................................................................................. 6 *Hillary Clinton Sidesteps Keystone in Climate Plan Rollout* // WSJ // Colleen McCain Nelson – July 27, 2015 7 *Hillary Clinton Previews Plans to Combat Climate Change* // WSJ // Colleen McCain Nelson - July 26, 2015 9 *In Iowa, Clinton says climate plan will promote renewables* // AP // Thomas Beaumont - July 26, 2015 10 *Clinton offers energy plans, declines comment on pipeline* // AP // Catherine Lucey – July 27, 2015 11 *Hillary Clinton steers clear of Keystone* // Politico // Hadas Gold – July 27, 2015........... 12 *The holes in Hillary Clinton's climate plan* // Politico // Elana Schor – July 27, 2015... 13 *Hillary Clinton rolls out climate agenda* // Politico // Darren Goode and Hadas Gold - July 26, 2015 15 *Hillary Clinton Vows to Defend, Extend Obama Climate Policy* // Bloomberg // Mark Drajem - July 26, 2015 17 *Hillary Clinton Outlines 'Bold' Climate Change Proposals* // Bloomberg // Jennifer Epstein - July 26, 2015 18 *Hillary Clinton Declines to Say Where She Stands on Keystone XL* // Bloomberg // Jennifer Epstein – July 27, 2015 20 *Hillary Clinton sets renewable energy goals to spur more wind, solar power* // Reuters // Alana Wise - July 26, 2015 21 *Clinton vows to boost U.S. clean energy use in response to climate change* // Reuters // Alana Wise – July 27, 2015 23 *Hillary Clinton pushes renewable energy with focus on solar* // CNN // Dan Merica – July 27, 2015 23 *Here is Hillary Clinton’s climate plan* // MSNBC // Alex Seitz-Wald - July 26, 2015...... 26 *Hillary Clinton Calls Out GOP Climate Change Deniers in New 'Stand With Reality' Video* // ABC // Liz Kreutz - July 26, 2015 27 *While Revealing Climate Plan, Clinton Mum on Keystone* // ABC // Andrew Rafferty – July 27, 2015 28 *Hillary Clinton Says Climate Plan Will Promote Renewables* // NBC // July 26, 2015... 29 *Clinton sets goals for solar panels, clean energy* // CBS // Rebecca Kaplan and Hannah Fraser-Chanpong – July 27, 2015 30 *Hillary Clinton Focuses On Renewable Energy In Climate Change Plan* // HuffPo // Marina Fang - July 26, 2015 31 *Hillary Clinton Pledges to Install 500 Million Solar Panels If Voted President* // TIME // Helen Regan - July 26, 2015 32 *Hillary Clinton sticks to safe ground on climate* // Vox // Jonathan Allen – July 27, 2015............ 33 *Hillary Clinton is calling for a 700% increase in solar power. Is that realistic?* // Vox // Brad Plumer - July 26, 2015 34 *Hillary Clinton's Climate-Change Plan Is Anything But Comprehensive* // TNR // Rebecca Leber – July 27, 2015 36 *Hillary Clinton unveils climate change policy* // LA Times // Evan Halper and Seema Mehta – July 27, 2015 37 *Hillary Clinton Refuses to Take a Position on the Keystone Pipeline* // Mother Jones // Tim McDonnell – July 27, 2015 39 *Hillary Clinton Just Went Big on Clean Energy. That Was the Easy Part.* // Slate // Josh Voorhees – July 27, 2015 41 *How does Hillary's climate change plan compare to Martin O'Malley's?* // CS Monitor // Gretel Kauffman – July 27, 2015 42 *Hillary Clinton has big plans for solar power. Are they achievable?* // CS Monitor // David J. Unger – July 27, 2015 43 *Hillary Clinton Still Won’t Talk About Keystone* // National Journal // Clare Foran – July 27, 2015 45 *Here’s How Hillary Clinton Wants to Fight Global Warming* // National Journal // Ben Beman and Clare Foran - July 26, 2015 46 *Coal group slams Clinton energy plan as a 'dog and pony climate show'* // The Hill // Devin Henry – July 27, 2015 49 *Clinton dodges Keystone question* // The Hill // Timothy Cama – July 27, 2015.............. 50 *Clinton sets climate, renewable power goals* // The Hill // Timothy Cama – July 26, 2015 51 *Hillary Clinton outlines climate change plan* // Washington Examiner // Zack Colman – July 17, 2015 52 *Hillary Clinton talks big on climate change but silent on Keystone XL* // Washington Times // S.A. Miller – July 27, 2015 54 *Hillary Clinton’s climate change goals include plan to ‘decarbonize’ America* // Washington Times // S.A. Miller - July 26, 2015 55 *Hillary Clinton's climate change policy pitch: install half a billion solar panels* // Guardian // Suzanne Goldenberg – July 27, 2015 57 *Hillary Clinton's Solar Pledge: 'Ambitious but Realistic'* // US News // Alan Neuhauser – July 27, 2015 59 *Why Hillary Clinton could be the solar industry's new best friend* // Fortune // Katie Fehrenbacher – July 27, 2015 60 *Hillary Clinton just released this bizarre video bashing 'mad scientist' GOP candidates on climate change* // Business Insider // Colin Campbell – July 27, 2015...................................................................................................................... 62 *Enough renewables to power “every home in America”: Hillary Clinton goes big on green energy* // Salon // Lindsay Abrams – July 27, 2015 63 *Hillary Clinton Just Released Her First Major Climate Change Proposals* // Mic // Zeeshan Aleem – July 27, 2015 64 *In climate change plan, Hillary Clinton makes big bet on solar power* // Mashable // Andrew Freedman – July 27, 2015 66 *Hillary Clinton's Climate Change Video Finally Calls Out Republicans' Bogus "I'm Not A Scientist" Platform* // Bustle // Lauren Barbato – July 27, 2015.............................................................................................................................. 68 *How Hillary Clinton's Climate Change Plan Stands Up To Martin O'Malley's, aka The Only Two Global Warming Strategies In The Entire Race* // Bustle // Kendyl Kearly – July 27, 2015............................................................................ 69 *Hillary Clinton’s Plan to Combat Climate Change With Half-A-Billion Solar Panels* //ThinkProgress // Emily Atkin – July 26, 2015 71 *Hillary Clinton proposes installing half a billion solar panels across America by 2020* // Fusion // Rob Wile – July 26, 2015 72 *In New Climate Change Plan, Hillary Attacks Republicans For Refusing To Accept ‘Settled Science’* // Daily Caller // Chuck Ross – July 27, 2015........................................................................................................................................... 73 *Clinton Announces Energy Plan, Wants to Install A Half-Billion Solar Panels By End Of First Term* // IB Times // Sarah Berger – July 27, 2015........................................................................................................................................... 75 *Clinton: We can protect planet and add jobs* // Des Moines Register // Tony Leys – July 27, 2015 75 *Hillary Clinton touts solar energy plan to court environmentalists in presidential run* // NY Daily News // Cameron Joseph – July 27, 2015 77 HRC NATIONAL COVERAGE Clinton Unveils Far-Reaching Climate Change Plan <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/26/clinton-to-unveil-climate-change-plan/> // NYT // Trip Gabriel and Coral Denport - July 26, 2015 Promising more than a half-billion solar panels by the end of a first term and an ambitious target of clean energy for every home in America in a decade, Hillary Rodham Clinton unveiled goals on Sunday evening to reduce the threat of climate change. She said she would continue President Obama’s sweeping plan to limit carbon emissions from power plants, and announced targets that even push beyond current goal’s for greenhouse gases. Mr. Obama’s proposed regulations are expected to be finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency in August, and the real work of making the changes — shutting down coal plans and increasing the number of renewable electricity sources — would fall to the next administration. The Clinton campaign said the goals, set out on its website in a video, were the first of a six-plank plan to address climate change that Mrs. Clinton would continue to unveil in coming weeks and months. Other areas of focus will be improving the efficiency of buildings, ensuring that fossil fuel production is “safe and responsible,’’ and protecting financial markets from climate-related risks. In the video and at an earlier event, Mrs. Clinton said that critics of taking strong action, who include most of the Republican presidential candidates, were ignoring the seriousness of the threat. “Those people on the other side, they will answer any question about climate change by saying, ‘I’m not a scientist,’’’ Mrs. Clinton said in Ames, Iowa on Sunday. “Well I’m not a scientist either. I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain.’’ Mrs. Clinton also promised to help any workers who lose their jobs as coal plants respond to Mr. Obama’s plan to limit carbon emissions. Appalachia, once a bastion of Democratic support, has been hostile to Mr. Obama for what officials like Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican majority leader, call a “war on coal.” “I will be very clear, I want to do more to help in coal country,’’ Mrs. Clinton said at the event. She expressed gratitude to men “who mined the coal that created industrial revolution that turned on the lights that fueled the factories, who lost their lives, who were grievously injured, who developed black lung disease.’’ Mrs. Clinton’s pledge to produce “enough renewable energy to power every American home within 10 years of taking office’’ — that is, by 2027 — is even more ambitious than Mr. Obama’s plan. The president has pledged to get the United States to produce 20 percent of electricity from renewable sources by 2030 — essentially tripling renewable power from today. Mrs. Clinton’s plan would arrive at 33 percent, said Heather Zichal, who served as Mr. Obama’s senior climate change adviser until last year. “I think this initial statement from her is a strong signal that she’s committed to a thoughtful policy that pushes the envelope,’’ she said. Mrs. Clinton’s rollout of a climate plan, the latest in a series of policy agendas, was in part intended to counter the threat on her left from Bernie Sanders, the Vermont senator who draws thunderous cheers at rallies when he calls for the immediate action on the warming climate. And unlike Mr. Sanders, Mrs. Clinton has not clearly stated whether she opposes building the Keystone XL pipeline, which has become the leading rallying cry of grass-roots environmentalists. On Friday, Tom Steyer, the billionaire climate activist, said that in order to receive his backing and financial support, a candidate would have to pledge to enact an energy policy that would lead to the generation of half the nation’s electricity from renewable or zero-carbon sources by 2030, and 100 percent by 2050. Martin O’Malley, the former governor of Maryland who is also seeking the Democratic nomination, has already put forth such a plan. In a statment, Mr. Steyer praised Mrs. Clinton’s proposal without offering explicit financial support. “Today, Hillary Clinton emerged as a strong leader in solving the climate crisis and ensuring our country’s economic security,” he said. Hillary Clinton lays out climate change initiative <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/26/hillary-clinton-lays-out-climate-change-initiative/> // WaPo // Vanessa Williams - July 26, 2015 Hillary Rodham Clinton called for harnessing the power of the sun to generate enough renewable energy to run every home in the country within the next decade, as part of a climate change initiative announced Sunday. "Future generations will look back and wonder, 'What were we thinking? How could we possibly be so irresponsible?' " the Democratic presidential candidate says in a video that accompanied the plan, which was posted on her Web site Sunday night. "I'm just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain and I know what's happening in the world will affect my daughter and especially my granddaughter," she said. In addition to touting her plan, which would include installing more than half a billion solar panels nationwide during the first term of her presidency, Clinton criticized the Republican presidential candidates, who generally dismiss the notion of climate change. "It's hard to believe that people running for president refuse to believe the settled science of climate change," she says in the video as quotes attributed to GOP hopefuls fill the screen. One such quote, attributed to former Florida governor Jeb Bush, reads: "I'm a skeptic. I'm not a scientist." Earlier Sunday, while campaigning in Iowa, she used the "grandmother with two eyes and a brain" quip, receiving chuckles and applause. She praised Iowa's efforts to embrace renewable energy, noting that the state produces 30 percent of its energy from wind. Windmills are a common sight on the horizon across the state. A fact sheet on the plan presented on her Web site said that Clinton will fight efforts to roll back the Clean Power Plan. And she proposes a Clean Power Challenge, including competitions for grants for renewal energy products, as well as more assistance to states and cities and more choices for consumers. Clinton is scheduled to discuss the plan during a speech Monday in Des Moines. Clinton talks climate change in Iowa — but still won’t talk Keystone <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/27/clinton-talks-climate-change-in-iowa-but-still-wont-talk-keystone/> // WaPo // Vanessa Williams – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton said Monday that if she's elected president, she could use executive orders and work through federal agencies if Congress tried to block her proposals to combat climate change. But she still wouldn't say where she stood on the Keystone XL project that's drawn the ire of environmentalists. Speaking at the Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority's Central Station, which is partly powered by renewable energy sources, the Democratic presidential candidate said climate change would be a major issue in her campaign going forward. “I refuse to turn my back on what is one of the greatest threats and greatest opportunities America faces," Clinton said. "I refuse to let those who are deniers, who disagree with what we need to do to rip away all the progress that we’ve made and leave our country exposed to the most severe consequences of climate change.” Although her plan was praised by some activists, including clean energy evangelist Tom Steyer, others have said it doesn't go far enough. Clinton, who has faced criticism for her continued silence on Keystone, on Monday again cited her involvement in the evaluating the project when she was secretary of state, noting that the final decision has yet to be made by her successor, John Kerry. "I will refrain from commenting because I had a leading role in getting that process started and we have to let it run its course,” she said. Clinton's remarks followed a social media rollout of her plans to combat climate change, which call for the installation of more than 500 million solar panels across the country within her first term and powering every home in the United States with renewable energy within 10 years. In a video presentation of her plan, Clinton took swipes at several Republican presidential candidates, displaying some of their past comments questioning whether climate change is real. One attributed to Jeb Bush read: "I'm a skeptic. I'm not a scientist." Another, attributed to Rand Paul: "It's absolutely and utterly untrue." Beyond resistance from Republican members of Congress, Clinton said, "our big problem will be the corporate interests that are promoting fossil fuels and still have too much of a grip on our political process and too many advantages in our tax code. I’m well aware I’m going up against powerful interests but there are a number of ways to get to where we need to go.” Clinton said she would make the case that renewable energy is not only good for the environment, but also for the economy because it would create “millions of new jobs and new businesses.” She made a point of giving a nod to workers in the fossil fuels industry. “Even as we face the threat of climate change head on we cannot close our eyes to the challenges facing hard working families in coal country, who kept our lights on and our factories running for more than a century," she said. "We should guarantee that coal miners and their families get the benefits they’ve earned and the respect they deserve.” Clinton she would flesh out her proposal, including how to pay for it, during the coming months. Two reasons why Hillary Clinton’s first climate change proposal is much more modest than it sounds <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/07/27/two-reasons-why-hillary-clintons-first-climate-change-proposal-is-much-more-modest-than-it-sounds/?postshare=3581438017100798> // WaPo // Philip Bump – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton announced the first "pillar" of her energy and climate agenda on Sunday, outlining a proposal to increase the number of solar panels to 500 million by the end of her first term -- and to have enough renewable power generation to provide electricity to every home in America by 2027. The proposals, particularly the latter, are striking. The main challenge of climate change is that the world (and the United States morseo than many places) is dependent on burning fossil fuels for electricity. Burning those fuels releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which traps heat. So moving the country to renewable energy sources, like wind and solar, can reduce the amount of greenhouse gases emitted and therefore stop exacerbating the problem. So why is this not as impressive a proposal as it might at first seem? 1. Residential electricity usage is only part of the problem. Data from the Energy Information Administration suggests that residences consume less than half of the electricity sold in the country. Clinton's proposal doesn't suggest that every house will use renewable power; just that the capacity exists. So a lot of electricity will still be generated the old-fashioned way. And while the fracking boom has helped increase the amount of natural gas that's used in production -- better once burned than coal, but potentially problematic when extracted -- we still rely heavily on coal for our power. 2. Hitting that solar growth target is hard -- but not as hard as you might think. Here's how much solar energy the residential sector has added over the past few years, thanks to improvements in generation, decreases in panel pricing, and a robust private sector push for installation. That's helped boost the amount of renewable electricity used in the residential sector overall. Can we increase solar usage 700 percent? Vox's Brad Plumer figures that the spike in solar usage puts the figure "within the realm of possibility." Solar has the benefit of being scalable on an individual level, which means that some organizing can help. And studies have found that solar power adoption is contagious. But despite the recent growth, as the chart above shows, solar is still a tiny part of the overall energy mix. In recent years, far larger growth in renewable power generation has been in wind. The new proposal is only the first pillar, we'll note, so we'll set aside the fact that this doesn't address other large sources of greenhouse gas emissions, like gasoline and diesel fuels. For those eager to hail Clinton as a champion of the environment, a third note of caution from a press conference today. On one of the top issues for environmental activists, Clinton doesn't have any proposals at all. Hillary Clinton Sidesteps Keystone in Climate Plan Rollout <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/07/27/hillary-clinton-sidesteps-keystone-in-climate-plan-rollout/> // WSJ // Colleen McCain Nelson – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton pledged to make combating climate change a central focus of the 2016 presidential campaign, saying Monday that she would not allow “deniers” to thwart progress or prevent the U.S. from leading on the issue. While Mrs. Clinton cast herself as a crusader for clean energy, she declined to weigh in on a key environmental debate, taking no position on whether to build the Keystone XL pipeline. At an event in Iowa touting her climate plan, Mrs. Clinton said that as secretary of state, she set in motion the review evaluating the pipeline and now would allow her successor, John Kerry, and President Barack Obama to make the final decision. Donald Trump Tops GOP Field in New Hampshire, Second in Iowa: Poll “I will refrain from commenting because I had a leading role in getting that process started,” Mrs. Clinton said. “And I think that we have to let it run its course.” Many Republicans have expressed skepticism about the science of climate change, with some questioning whether it’s real and others doubting that human activity plays a role in global warming — or could play a role in reversing it. The Keystone XL pipeline, which would move oil from Canada’s oil sands to refineries along the U.S. Gulf Coast, has emerged as a touchstone issue for environmentalists, as well as the energy industry. Democratic presidential candidates Martin O’Malley and Bernie Sanders have been vocal opponents of the project. Mrs. Clinton said her Democratic rivals never served as secretary of state and added that she is confident Keystone’s impact on greenhouse gas emissions would be a major factor in the administration’s determination of whether to build the pipeline. Lis Smith, Mr. O’Malley’s deputy campaign manager, said Monday: “Every Democrat should follow [Mr. O'Malley's] lead and take a stand to commit to ending our reliance on fossil fuels.” Mrs. Clinton said she’s committed to making the U.S. a “clean-energy superpower” and that on day one of her presidency, she would begin work on two key goals: installing more than half a billion solar panels by the end of her first term and generating enough renewable energy to power every home in the country within a decade. Mr. Obama put the county on a path to a clean-energy future, she said, but more needs to be done. “The reality of climate change is unforgiving no matter what the deniers say,” Mrs. Clinton said. “This is one of the most urgent threats of our time, and we have no choice but to rise and meet it.” The Republican National Committee on Monday deemed Mrs. Clinton’s climate policy vague and costly. “Hillary Clinton’s energy ‘plan’ is to raise more taxes and double down on President Obama’s EPA overreach, which held down wages and cost American jobs,” RNC spokesman Michael Short said. “Clinton avoided specifics and refused to take a position on important job-creating energy projects like the Keystone Pipeline, reminding voters why they think she’s untrustworthy.” Mrs. Clinton did not detail how, exactly, she would pay for her clean-energy proposals. She said she would offer more specifics in the future and that some of these initiatives would pay for themselves. Mr. Obama has faced strong resistance in Congress to his climate agenda and largely has relied on executive actions to rein in carbon emissions. Mrs. Clinton said she may pursue a similar strategy but added that addressing climate change should be a nonpartisan issue. “We still have a lot that we can do without getting congressional support,” Mrs. Clinton said. “However, it is in everybody’s interest. This is not a Republican or Democratic problem.” Hillary Clinton Previews Plans to Combat Climate Change <http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-previews-plans-to-combat-climate-change-1437946583> // WSJ // Colleen McCain Nelson - July 26, 2015 Hillary Clinton on Sunday offered a preview of her plans to combat climate change, pledging to set high goals and build a clean-energy economy. At an organizing event in Iowa, Mrs. Clinton swiped at Republicans who question the threat posed by climate change and said she was serious about addressing the issue. “Those people on the other side, they will answer any question about climate change by saying I’m not a scientist,” she said. “I’m not a scientist either—I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain…I know that if we start addressing it, we’re going to actually be creating jobs and new businesses.” The Clinton campaign is expected to release more details about her climate policy Sunday evening, and she will deliver a speech about her plan Monday morning in Des Moines. Mrs. Clinton has previously characterized climate change as an urgent threat and has voiced support for President Barack Obama’s executive actions to limit carbon pollution. She has stayed silent, though, on the question of whether the Keystone XL pipeline should be built, declining to weigh in on what has been a contentious yearslong debate. Mrs. Clinton oversaw the Obama administration’s review of the project during her tenure as secretary of state. She made no mention of Keystone on Sunday but called for an emphasis on generating more wind and solar energy. Mrs. Clinton called for a rebalancing of tax incentives, which she said are too heavily weighted toward fossil fuels. “Our politics are imprisoned by the past,” she said. Democratic presidential candidates Martin O’Malley and Bernie Sanders have been unequivocal in their opposition to Keystone and have made climate policy a central component of their campaigns. Mr. O’Malley has laid out an aggressive plan for combating climate change, calling for the U.S. to transition to 100% clean energy by 2050. Mr. O’Malley, the former governor of Maryland, has called for federal legislation capping carbon emissions and has pledged to reject the Keystone XL pipeline and deny new permits for drilling in Alaska and Antarctica. Mr. Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont who is running in the Democratic primary, has been a vocal opponent of the pipeline, which has been under review by the Obama administration for more than six years. He has urged “bold action” and has said the U.S. needs to accelerate technological progress to generate more solar and wind energy. Mrs. Clinton’s rollout of a plan to address climate change comes on the heels of billionaire climate-change activist Tom Steyer calling for 2016 candidates to develop concrete plans to increase the share of clean energy in the U.S.’s power generation mix to 50% by 2030. Mr. Steyer, who spent $73 million during the 2014 midterm elections, has set a high bar for winning his support in 2016. A spokesperson for his advocacy group, NextGen Climate, on Friday said candidates who don’t embrace Mr. Steyer’s goal aren’t likely to be backed by the organization. In Iowa, Clinton says climate plan will promote renewables <http://bigstory.ap.org/article/1dc4c6f2ac974be6b8dcbf2cdf9fcab9/iowa-clinton-says-climate-plan-will-promote-renewables> // AP // Thomas Beaumont - July 26, 2015 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton unveiled Sunday a plan aimed at combating climate change that includes proposed revisions in the tax code to promote renewable energy and goals for renewable sources for consumer electricity. In Iowa, the nation's second-leading wind energy producer, Clinton said people are "just not paying attention" if they don't acknowledge climate change. "This is not complicated folks," the former secretary of state told more than 200 people at Iowa State University. "I'm just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain. And I know we're facing huge problem." Climate change has become a key issue in the Democratic presidential primary, where Clinton is the heavy favorite. Billionaire Tom Steyer has led an effort to promote the issue. The California-based Steyer hosted a fundraiser for Clinton in May. Clinton proposes, through tax incentives, to increase the amount of power derived from renewable sources to support every home in the United States within 10 years. For instance, Clinton said she supports renewing the wind energy tax credit as part of over time shifting the U.S. energy system from one based on fossil fuels. "We need to get the incentives fixed in our tax system which as you know are too heavily weighted toward fossil fuels," Clinton said during a day of campaigning in central Iowa. Clinton also hinted that her plans would impose changes on the coal industry, though she also pledged the government's help for workers to make the transition. "We can make a transition over time from a fossil fuel economy, predominantly, to a clean renewable energy economy, predominantly," Clinton said later during an event at a central Iowa rural home. Weaning the country off of coal is a tricky political position in key places on the political battleground map. Southeast Ohio and western Pennsylvania are regions of states that have been pivotal in recent elections. And they remain the home of key coal-producing areas. Crediting coal-miners for having "created an industrial revolution," Clinton said "it is important that we help them transition to a new economy." Clinton's plan also includes the goal of installing 500 million solar panels within four years. It would also increase capacity to the nation's power grid with a combination of renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, hydroelectric and geothermal. Clinton did not include a price tag for the plan or describe how it would be financed. Clinton was scheduled to discuss the plan in detail during a public event in Des Moines Monday morning. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, also seeking the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, noted Sunday that he unveiled a climate change plan in Iowa that addresses not just consumer energy use, but industrial and transportation, as well. As governor, O'Malley doubled Maryland's renewable fuel production, and reduced greenhouse gases in the state by 10 percent during his two terms. Clinton offers energy plans, declines comment on pipeline <http://bigstory.ap.org/article/1dc4c6f2ac974be6b8dcbf2cdf9fcab9/iowa-clinton-says-climate-plan-will-promote-renewables> // AP // Catherine Lucey – July 27, 2015 Hillary Rodham Clinton is detailing new energy proposals in Iowa to address climate change. She calls global warming one of the "most urgent threats of our time." But she's still not taking a position on the Keystone XL oil pipeline. The Democratic presidential contender is proposing that every home in the United States be powered by renewable sources by 2027. Her plan calls for installation of 500 million solar panels over four years. Clinton laid out clean-energy ideas during a tour of a regional bus station in Des Moines, Iowa, on Monday. When asked about the Keystone XL oil pipeline opposed by environmental activists, she would not comment except to say she wants a State Department review of the project to run its course. Hillary Clinton steers clear of Keystone <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/hillary-clinton-keystone-xl-pipeline-120673.html?ml=tl_13> // Politico // Hadas Gold – July 27, 2015 Despite rolling out a set of climate change goals Sunday night, Hillary Clinton declined once again to take a position on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline on Monday, deferring to the State Department. After touring a green-certified transit station in Des Moines, Clinton told reporters that she wouldn’t comment on the pipeline because she had played a leading role in starting the process to review the project while she was secretary of state. “No other presidential candidate was secretary of state when this process started, and I put together a very thorough deliberative evidence-based process to evaluate the environmental impact and other considerations of Keystone,” Clinton said. “As such, I know there is a very careful evaluation continuing and that the final decision is pending to be made by Secretary Kerry and President Obama. Very simply, the evaluation determines whether this pipeline is in our nation’s interest and I’m confident that the pipeline impacts on global greenhouse gas emissions will be a major factor in that decisions, as the president has said. So I will refrain from commenting because I had a leading role in getting that process started and I think we have to let it run its course,” she said. On Sunday evening, Clinton rolled out the first elements of her climate change platform, calling for moving the economy on “a path towards deep decarbonization by 2050” and “enough clean renewable energy to power every home in America” by 2027. On Monday, Clinton said she will soon lay out a plan for how to pay for her goals but that she intends to be a “good fiscal steward” for investments that will pay off in the future. “A lot of these changes will pay for themselves. So there will be front-end money needed,” Clinton said. “But there are ways of making those investments and getting a return on those investments that will redound to the benefits of the American taxpayer. So I will be talking about energy and climate security, modernizing North American infrastructure, about safe and responsible production, especially making sure tax payers get a fair deal for development on public lands and areas that I think are too sensitive for production that should be taken off the table.” Clinton also said she would stop the “giveaways to big oil companies” and extend tax incentives to clean energy. As for convincing a possible Republican-controlled Congress to join on the climate change bandwagon, Clinton said she hopes to be able to call for a “ceasefire” on climate change. “Making this a central issue in my campaign, I hope, will give me the momentum to be able to go to the congress and say, ‘Look, cease fire.’ We need to make the transition and we can do it and save money at the same time and create millions of new jobs and businesses that will be to the benefit of our country, so stay tuned,” Clinton said. The holes in Hillary Clinton's climate plan <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/the-holes-in-hillary-clintons-climate-plan-120682.html> // Politico // Elana Schor – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton’s newly unveiled climate vision sounds ambitious on its face: 500 million new solar panels from coast to coast, eco-minded energy tax breaks and enough green power to keep the lights on in every U.S. home. But just as glaring were the details she left out. Does Clinton support or oppose the Keystone XL oil pipeline? Or Arctic offshore drilling? Or tougher restrictions on fracking? Or the oil industry’s push to lift the 1970s ban on exporting U.S. crude oil? Clinton avoided all those questions in the solar-heavy climate plan she outlined Sunday night, and in her speech promoting it Monday in Iowa — and she declined yet again Monday to say where she stands on Keystone. That means that liberals longing for Clinton to erase what they see as the dirtiest spot on President Barack Obama’s environmental record — his support for an “all-of-the-above” energy strategy that includes domestic oil and gas drilling — have to keep waiting. Greens want to cheer for Clinton, but Democratic rivals Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley are already trying to outflank her with even more ambitious climate plans, while the GOP attacks her from the right. “Clinton’s climate plan is remarkable for what it doesn’t say, yet,” California-based environmental activist R.L. Miller, who founded the Climate Hawks Vote PAC, said in a statement. Specifically, she added, Clinton offered “no effort to keep fossil fuels in the ground, no price on carbon; no word on Keystone XL, Arctic oil or other carbon bombs; no word on fracking.” Climate activists are also looking for the Democratic front-runner to put some distance between herself and her record at the State Department, which issued a series of studies finding no significant environmental obstacles to approving Keystone. “We’re expecting a reset” of the former secretary’s platform, Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune said in an interview, “and a completely different climate and energy policy than the last time she ran for president.” While Clinton’s pitch to boost renewables to a 33-percent share of the nation’s power supply is “a positive first step,” Brune added, “we’re looking for her to reconcile her climate and energy policies, which is something Obama has not yet been able to do effectively.” Even a largely glowing response from billionaire climate activist Tom Steyer made a point of noting that “in the coming months we look forward to hearing more details about her proposals.” At the core of the tension is climate activists’ insistence that the next president go beyond defending Obama’s main approach to global warming — a series of EPA regulations that will throttle carbon emissions from major pollution sources such as power plants. Instead, they want Obama’s successor to commit to reining in an oil and gas industry that has turned the U.S. into one of the world’s top fuel exporters. Anti-fossil fuel campaign group Oil Change International’s campaigns director, David Turnbull, warned that greens are looking for a candidate with a plan to keep oil and gas locked up, not just expand wind and solar projects. “Any coherent climate policy needs to address not just our urgent need to continue scaling up renewable energy but also the reality that fossil fuel production needs to be swiftly curtailed as well,” he said. Clinton’s campaign described Monday’s speech as “just the beginning” of a broader energy plan, promising future proposals to cut U.S. oil use — without mention of natural gas consumption — and ensure “safe and responsible” drilling by putting some lands off-limits. But the former first lady has already declined to endorse a ban on fossil-fuel development on public lands, which O’Malley has backed, and she hewed to a years-long pattern in declining to take a position on Keystone. O’Malley’s deputy campaign manager, Lis Smith, slammed Clinton again Monday for avoiding Keystone, and for failing to publicly oppose drilling off the Alaska coast. “Real leadership is about forging public opinion on issues like Keystone — not following it,” Smith said in a statement that touted O’Malley’s goal of 100-percent clean power by 2050. ”Every Democrat should follow his lead and take a stand to commit to ending our reliance on fossil fuels.” Republican National Committee spokesman Michael Short also hit Clinton over her Keystone silence, but the GOP took the criticism a step further by trashing her renewable-power plan as lacking detail yet loaded with inevitable tax hikes. “Hillary Clinton’s energy ‘plan’ is to raise more taxes and double down on President Obama’s EPA overreach,” Short said in a statement. The Clinton camp estimates that its proposal, which calls for installing 500 million solar panels across the U.S. by the end of her term, would cost about $60 billion over 10 years — money that would come from rolling back tax benefits for the oil and gas industry. But it’s unclear where at least $20 billion of that money would come from. Democrats have unsuccessfully targeted an array of oil and gas breaks for repeal over the past four years, with estimates of the money raised in the process going as high as $4 billion per year, or $40 billion over 10 years, leaving Clinton short by one-third at best. A failed 2012 Democratic bill ending oil and gas subsidies would have raised $24 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The Clinton campaign did not return a request for comment on how it would close the gap in paying for its renewable-energy plan, and on its future oil and gas agenda. Still, environmentalists welcomed Clinton’s announcement as a promising start. Heather Taylor-Miesle, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council Action Fund, said her group is “excited about” the opening bid from Clinton, while acknowledging that “we have to deal with oil and gas” and that environmentalists won’t know how to judge the candidate’s plan in that department until she reveals it. Even 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben, who aimed a torrent of anti-Keystone activism at Clinton’s State Department and warned her in June that “many serious environmentalists currently distrust you,” said her first crack at a climate plan got “half the way there.” “Now, we need Clinton to show she understands the other half of the climate change equation — and prove she has the courage to stand up against fossil fuel projects like offshore and Arctic drilling, coal leasing in [Wyoming’s] Powder River basin and the Keystone XL pipeline,” he added in a statement. After Clinton said Monday that she couldn’t speak on Keystone “because I had a leading role in” the pipeline’s administration review, McKibben said by email that her rationale was “silly” because “she’s rightly full of insights about Iran, about Benghazi, about Korea, about a thousand other ongoing issues the State [Department] processes daily.” Hillary Clinton rolls out climate agenda <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/hillary-clinton-2016-renewable-power-plan-120644.html> // Politico // Darren Goode and Hadas Gold - July 26, 2015 Hillary Clinton unveiled her most detailed proposals on climate change since becoming a presidential candidate, calling for moving the economy on “a path towards deep decarbonization by 2050” and “enough clean renewable energy to power every home in America” by 2027. Progressives have been badgering Clinton to take a strong stance on climate change. Earlier this month in New Hampshire a group of activists disrupted her first town hall in the state, demanding she pledge to end extraction of fossil fuels on public lands. The plan is the most specific that Clinton’s made yet as a candidate on how she would combat climate change, she and though she has often been outflanked on the left by her Democratic challengers, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley. But on Sunday evening she won praise from billionaire climate-change activist Tom Steyer, who last week called on presidential candidates to embrace a goal of generating 50 percent of the nation’s power from carbon-free sources by 2030 with an eye toward “a completely clean energy economy” by 2050. Clinton spokesperson Brian Fallon said that the plan Clinton laid out is the equivalent of 33 percent of power coming from green energy sources like solar, wind and geothermal by 2027, which when coupled with nuclear power, exceeds Steyer’s 2030 goal. In a statement after Clinton’s plan emerged, Steyer said the Democratic front runner had “emerged as a strong leader” in addressing climate change. “Clinton laid out an ambitious framework to put our nation on a path to a clean energy economy that will create millions of jobs—and in the coming months we look forward to hearing more details about her proposals to tackle climate change,” he said. Clinton’s plan calls for having 500 million solar panels installed by the end her term if she’s elected president. That would be part of the effort to hike solar capacity to 140 gigawatts by the end of 2020, the equivalent of about 140 nuclear reactors and an increase of 700 percent from current levels. She also wants to add more power generation from other renewable sources, like wind and geothermal. Clinton called for extending federal clean energy tax incentives, and she pledged to defend the Obama Clean Power Plan, which would cut greenhouse gases from power plants. She also would launch a “Clean Energy Challenge” that would award competitive grants and other incentives for states. Her campaign will roll out out a more detailed energy and climate strategy in the coming months that will call for reducing oil consumption, modernize the nation’s energy infrastructure, improve building efficiency and “protect the health and retirement security” of coal miners. In a speech on Sunday in a ballroom at the Iowa State University alumni center, Clinton was bullish on her climate change goals. “I am setting some really high goals that we are going to meet when I am president,” Clinton said, noting that just as many people work in the solar power sector as do in the coal industry. “Those people on the other side, they will answer any question about climate change by saying ‘I’m not a scientist,’” she continued. “I’m not a scientist either. I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain.” Clinton also unveiled a new video on Sunday hitting Republicans for denying climate change. “Future generations will look back and say ‘what were we thinking? How could we be so irresponsible,’” Clinton says in the video. In one clip, quotes from Republican candidates such as Jeb Bush, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Donald Trump denying climate change appear on the screen as Clinton says “It’s hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change.” On Monday, Clinton will speak about her climate change plan at a Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority station. Two of Clinton’s primary challengers, O’Malley and Sanders, have sought to outflank her on the left on climate change. Sanders has noted his views on climate and staunch opposition to building of the Keystone XL oil pipeline as two areas his record is distinguishable from Clinton’s. O’Malley’s campaign released a preemptive strike via email Sunday afternoon, touting his signing into law as governor a statewide target of reducing total greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by 2020. O’Malley, who is running a distant third in the Democratic race, is also pushing for electricity to be solely derived from renewable sources by 2050. That’s the exact same pledge Steyer is seeking from 2016 presidential candidates, but Steyer has also already held a fundraiser for Clinton at his San Francisco home. Hillary Clinton Vows to Defend, Extend Obama Climate Policy <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-27/hillary-clinton-stakes-out-climate-change-agenda> // Bloomberg // Mark Drajem - July 26, 2015 Hillary Clinton said she would both defend and go beyond the efforts by President Barack Obama to address climate change in the first detailed description of her potential environmental polices if elected president. Clinton released what her campaign said was the opening salvo of the Democrat’s energy and climate change agenda Sunday, while she was campaigning in Iowa. Among other things, Clinton pledged to defend from legal or political attack the Obama administration’s rule to cut carbon pollution from the nation’s fleet of power plants. A Clinton administration would go further, rewarding communities that speed rooftop solar panel installation, backing a contest for states to go beyond the minimums called for in the environmental rules, and boosting solar and wind production on federal lands. A four-page campaign fact sheet said the goal was to increase the share of U.S. power generation from renewable sources to 33 percent by 2027, compared to 25 percent under Obama’s carbon plan. The announcement “makes it more clear than ever that she cares deeply about climate change and will make it a top priority throughout her campaign,” Tiernan Sittenfeld, senior vice president of the League of Conservation Voters Action Fund, said in a statement. State Mandates The majority of U.S. states had already established their own renewable power goals by 2012, according to the federal Energy Information Administration. California has a goal of buying 33 percent of its power from renewable energy resources by 2020. The state describes this renewables portfolio standard on its website as “one of the most ambitious” in the country. The early announcement of Clinton’s climate plan contrasts with the last presidential election cycle, in which neither major-party nominee highlighted the issue. Environmental advocates started a social media effort to try to get both campaigns to at least talk about the the climate. Since winning re-election, Obama has made fighting climate a top priority and introduced a series of measures. He said this month that getting a global deal on cutting greenhouse-gas emissions is the remaining top priority of his tenure. The mix of policies laid out by Clinton include a pledge to produce enough renewable energy in a decade to power every U.S. home, and to curb gasoline demand, neither an easy task. U.S. gasoline usage is up this year, as lower prices boost driving. The campaign’s plans don’t include any actions aimed specifically at helping oil, natural gas or coal producers. Clinton said she would help coal-dependent communities, such as those in West Virginia or eastern Kentucky, cope with the transition away from the carbon-heavy fuel. Obama had made a similar pledge in his most recent budget. Hillary Clinton Outlines 'Bold' Climate Change Proposals <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-26/hillary-clinton-outlines-climate-change-proposals> // Bloomberg // Jennifer Epstein - July 26, 2015 Hillary Clinton on Sunday set two "bold national goals" to combat climate change, promising that if she's elected president, she would set the United States on a path toward producing enough clean renewable to power every home in America within a decade. She would also initiate a process that would bring the total number of solar panels installed nationwide to more than half a billion before the end of her first term, her campaign said in a fact sheet released Sunday as it also posted a video in which Clinton lays out her ambitions. "We cannot wait any longer" to act on climate change, the Democratic front-runner says in the video. "It's time we stand for a healthier climate, stand for cleaner air, for science, for innovation, for our children, for reality, for the future." Sunday's announcement and an accompanying speech set for Monday at the LEED Platinum-certified Des Moines Area Regional Transit Central Station are intended as a first step in framing Clinton's views on climate and energy issues. More details about her specific positions and policy areas not discussed will be unveiled in the coming months, the campaign said. Clinton's unveiling of her big-picture views on renewable energy while visiting Iowa is no accident. The state produces nearly a quarter of the nation's ethanol and is building a growing number of wind farms. Twenty-eight percent of Iowa's power comes from wind, and the state trails only Texas in wind power production. The dominance of renewable energy industries in the state makes it a key political issue, one on which Clinton believes her views align not only with Democrats but with most voters. In the video, Clinton hints at Republicans who, to varying degrees, deny the existence of climate change while the screen populates with quotes from former Florida Governor Jeb Bush ("I'm a skeptic. I'm not a scientist."), Kentucky Senator Rand Paul ("It's absolutely and utterly untrue.") and Donald Trump ("Hoax"), among others. “Those people on the other side, they will answer any question about climate change by saying, 'I’m not a scientist,'" Clinton said Sunday while speaking at Iowa State University in Ames, before adding a laugh-line that she also uses in the video. "Well, I’m not a scientist either. I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain." If elected, Clinton would fight back against Republican efforts to demolish the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan, a set of regulations on greenhouse gas emissions expected to be finalized in the coming days or weeks. Those rules and others "set the floor, not the ceiling," the campaign said in its fact sheet, and Clinton would aim to encourage innovation with a Clean Energy Challenge for states, cities and rural communities to get federal support for clean energy programs. Clinton supports extending and adding to existing tax credits to encourage the production and use of energy from renewable sources, as well as the expansion of the production and use of renewable energy on public lands and in federal buildings. One concern that contributes to opposition—from Republicans and from some Democrats who represent coal country—to the expansion of the clean energy and the phasing out of the use of coal is what happens to all the people who work in the industry. But, Clinton said Sunday in Ames, she would focus resources on aiding regions already in decline because of the diminishing role of coal. “I will be very clear: I want to do more to help in coal country," she said. About a dozen orange-shirted members of NextGen Climate Iowa, the state branch of the super-PAC founded and funded by billionaire investor and climate activist Tom Steyer, watched Clinton speak on Sunday and then waited in line to pose for a group photo with Clinton. Steyer is using his wealth to support candidates and groups that back his approach to climate change, and has already given the primary maximum $2,700 to Clinton and hosted a fundraiser for her at his San Francisco home. On Friday, he said that candidates who he supports must have concrete plans for making clean energy at least half the overall power supply generated in the United States by 2030. Steyer is also opposed to the construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline. Clinton has repeatedly avoided taking a position on whether Keystone should be approved by the Obama administration, saying she wants to let the State Department-led process run its course without her interference. Others running for the Democratic presidential nomination, though, have been more clear, going right for the liberal activist base that has rallied against the project in what's become a symbolic fight for both sides. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley both say they're opposed to the pipeline and have attacked Clinton for not doing the same. “I have helped lead the opposition against the Keystone pipeline,” Sanders told reporters earlier this month as Clinton visited Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill. “I don’t believe we should be excavating or transporting some of the dirtiest fuel on this planet. I think Secretary Clinton has not been clear on her views on that issue.” O'Malley's campaign, meanwhile, prebutted Clinton's Sunday announcement with a memo on "what real climate leadership looks like" that recaps his opposition to Keystone and to offshore and Arctic drilling, as well as his proposals to create millions of jobs by boosting the clean energy industry. The initial reaction from climate groups to Clinton's framework was positive. "“Secretary Clinton’s spot-on video makes it more clear than ever that she cares deeply about climate change and will make it a top priority throughout her campaign," League of Conservation Voters senior vice president for government affairs Tiernan Sittenfeld said in a statement. "Her goals of getting to 500 million solar panels by 2020 and ensuring that we are producing enough renewable energy to power every home in America in ten years display the kind of leadership we need to ensure that our nation leads the world in building a clean energy economy." Hillary Clinton Declines to Say Where She Stands on Keystone XL <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-27/hillary-clinton-declines-to-say-where-she-stands-on-keystone-xl> // Bloomberg // Jennifer Epstein – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton declined Monday to weigh in on the Obama administration’s ongoing deliberations over the Keystone XL oil pipeline, avoiding an issue that has become a litmus test for climate activists. After launching the first part of her agenda aimed at combating climate change, the former secretary of state told reporters in Iowa she “will refrain from commenting [on Keystone] because I had a leading role in getting that process started and we have to let it run its course.” Clinton said that during her time as President Barack Obama's top diplomat, she “put together a very thorough, deliberative, evidence-based process to evaluate the environmental impact” of the proposed pipeline, which would run from Alberta, Canada, to Nebraska. Before launching her presidential campaign, Clinton refused to comment on the pipeline permit approval process, saying she didn't want to preempt or influence the process. Monday was the first time she’d been asked since entering the race in April. Other candidates running for the Democratic nomination have seized on Clinton’s caution and attacked her for refusing to take a definitive stance. “I have helped lead the opposition against the Keystone pipeline,” Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders said earlier this month as Clinton visited Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill. “I don’t believe we should be excavating or transporting some of the dirtiest fuel on this planet. I think Secretary Clinton has not been clear on her views on that issue.” Minutes after Clinton spoke Monday, Democratic presidential candidate and former Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley's campaign criticized Clinton for what it described as a lack of leadership. “Governor O'Malley is opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline because we can't move to a clean energy future if we continue to rely on dirty, short-term fossil fuel fixes,” deputy campaign manager Lis Smith said in a statement. “Real leadership is about forging public opinion on issues like Keystone—not following it. Every Democrat should follow his lead and take a stand to commit to ending our reliance on fossil fuels.” Clinton acknowledged that the pipeline is a politicized issue and stressed that she is in a unique position. “No other presidential candidate was secretary of state when this process started,” she said. Hillary Clinton sets renewable energy goals to spur more wind, solar power <http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/27/us-usa-election-clinton-energy-idUSKCN0Q00X920150727> // Reuters // Alana Wise - July 26, 2015 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton called on Sunday for a dramatic national shift to energy sources such as solar and wind, setting a goal of generating enough clean renewable energy to power every U.S. home within a decade after she takes office. Clinton, the front-runner for her party's 2016 presidential nomination, also pledged to have more than half a billion solar panels installed nationwide within four years of taking office. "I want more wind, more solar, more advanced biofuels, more energy efficiency," Clinton said at a rally on Sunday in Ames, Iowa. "And I’ve got to tell you, people who argue against this are just not paying attention." The two goals, announced in a video on Sunday night, were the first elements of what Clinton said would be a comprehensive climate-change agenda to be released over the next few months. Clinton has been under pressure from Democratic presidential rival Senator Bernie Sanders, a self-styled socialist who has called for swift action on climate change, and environmental activists anxious to see her spell out details of a climate plan. Her campaign said the goals would lead to a 700 percent increase in the nation's installed solar capacity from current levels, and eventually could lead to the generation of at least one third of all electricity from renewable sources. Clinton also called for extending federal clean energy tax incentives and making them more cost effective. In Ames, Clinton said she would continue the wind production tax credit and recalibrate other tax incentives that are "too heavily weighted ... toward fossil fuels." Clinton also said she would fight efforts to roll back President Barack Obama's executive actions to curb carbon emissions from power plants. She said the actions could build a "clean energy economy" that would bolster growth. "If we start addressing it, we're going to actually be creating jobs and new businesses," she said. Clinton will discuss the proposals on Monday at an energy-efficient transit station in Iowa, the state that kicks off the 2016 presidential nominating race and is a leading wind energy producer. Clinton praised Iowa for promoting wind energy and advanced biofuels, and for establishing state tax rebates for installing solar panels in homes and businesses. She criticized Republicans who are reluctant to say climate change is a man-made phenomenon. "They will answer any question about climate change by saying: ‘I’m not a scientist.’ Well, I’m not a scientist either. I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain and I know we’re facing a huge problem," Clinton said. Clinton vows to boost U.S. clean energy use in response to climate change <http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/27/us-usa-election-clinton-idUSKCN0Q11YK20150727> // Reuters // Alana Wise – July 27, 2015 U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Monday described climate change as "one of most urgent threats of our time" and vowed to meet the challenge with a plan to generate enough clean energy to power every U.S. home by 2027. The Democratic front-runner compared fighting climate change to the race to put an American on the moon by the end of the 1960s. "The next decade will be as decisive for climate change as the decade for getting to the moon was for space exploration," Clinton said at a campaign stop in Iowa, which will hold the first presidential nominating contest in February. "Sea levels are rising, ice caps are melting, storms, wildfires and extreme weather are wreaking havoc. This is one of most urgent threats of our time and we have no choice but to rise and meet it," said Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic nomination in the November 2016 election. Clinton promised to have more than half a billion solar panels installed nationwide within four years if she makes it to the White House. The former secretary of state has been under pressure from Democratic presidential rival Senator Bernie Sanders, a self-described socialist who has called for swift action on climate change, and environmental activists anxious to see her spell out details of a climate plan. She vowed to "stop the giveaways to big oil companies" and to defend President Barack Obama's plan to reduce emissions from power plants, which is hitting the coal industry. More details of Clinton's climate change agenda will be released over the next few months. The Republican National Committee said Clinton's energy policies were vague and aimed at distracting attention from the controversy of her use of a private email account while she ran the State Department. "Hillary Clinton's energy 'plan' is to raise more taxes and double down on President Obama’s EPA overreach, which held down wages and cost American jobs. Clinton avoided specifics and refused to take a position on important job-creating energy projects like the Keystone pipeline, reminding voters why they think she's untrustworthy," said RNC spokesman Michael Short. Hillary Clinton pushes renewable energy with focus on solar <http://Hillary%2520Clinton%2520pushes%2520renewable%2520energy%2520with%2520focus%2520on%2520solar> // CNN // Dan Merica – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton pledged Sunday that as president she would put the United States on a path toward generating enough renewable energy to power every home in the country by 2027 - ten years after she would hypothetically take office. In a video posted to her campaign website, Clinton knocked Republicans for refusing "to accept the settled science of climate change" and cast her push as a fight for children and grandchildren. "I am just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain and I know what is happening in the world is going to have a big effect on my daughter and especially my granddaughters," Clinton said, using a line she often delivers at campaign events. "You don't have to be a scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all. You just have to be willing to act." The video - titled "Stand for Reality" - featured a slate of quotes from Republicans on climate change, including when former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush told Esquire Magazine in 2009, "I'm a skeptic. I'm not a scientist." The slate also included quotes from Sens. Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. "You don't have to be a scientist to accept scientific evidence," Clinton tweeted. "Climate change is real and we must act. -H." Clinton's plan focuses largely on residential power usage and is buoyed by a focus on solar. By the end of her hypothetical first term as president, Clinton promised that the United States would have more than 500 million solar panels installed across the country. The presidential candidate also stressed building an energy grid more focused on renewable energy, particularly solar, by the end of the decade. According to a fact sheet circulated by Clinton's campaign, a Clinton presidency would hope to increase output of solar energy by 700% by the end of the decade. On Monday, Clinton will expand on her clean energy push in Iowa when she tours that LEED Platinum certified Des Moines Area Regional Transit (DART) Central Station. Clinton's said he plan would incentivize investment in renewables by increasing the number of government grants for clean energy, extending federal clean energy tax incentives and expanding renewable energy on public lands. "The decisions we make in the next decade can make all of this possible. Or, they can keep us trapped in the past," Clinton says in the video. "We cannot wait any longer. It is time we stand for healthier climate, stand for cleaner air, for science, for innovation, for our children. For reality, for the future." The former secretary of state's clean energy pitch comes at a time where many Democrats are focused on climate change, particularly the need to decrease the use of fossil fuels. According to the World Bank, over 85% of U.S. energy consumption came from fossil fuels. Clinton was confronted by climate change protestors at a town hall earlier this month in New Hampshire. The former secretary of state was first asked a "yes or no" question about banning the extraction of fossil fuels from public grounds. Clinton did not give the protestors the answer they wanted, telling them she would not ban the practice until alternatives were in place. According to the fact sheet, Clinton does not rule out using federal land for fossil fuel development, but says that she would ensure "taxpayers get a fair deal for development on public lands, and that areas that are too sensitive for energy production are taken off the table." Some of Clinton's top supporters have also been outspoken on the need for 2016 Democrats to tackle climate change. Tom Steyer, a hedge fund billionaire and the head of NextGen Climate, a non-profit focused on climate change, issued an open letter on Friday that called for all 2016 Democrats to "lay out a clear and concrete plan to achieve at least 50 percent clean or carbon-free energy by 2030." "Whether or not candidates make this commitment will be a critical factor for Americans who are deciding what candidates to support at polls," wrote Steyer, who has already hosted a fundraiser for Clinton at his home in California. An aide to Steyer tells CNN that Clinton's energy proposal meets the standard the environmentalist outlined last week. Clinton's campaign claimed Sunday that their plan matches the Steyer pledge, but a supportive statement from the environmentalist did not outright say Clinton's plan met his standards. He did call the plan "an ambitious framework to put our nation on a path to a clean energy economy," adding that Clinton "emerged as a strong leader in solving the climate crisis and ensuring our country's economic security" due to the proposal. Campaign aides stressed that Sunday's announcement was their opening salvo, not their entire clean energy platform, and Clinton herself said in the video that she will lay out her entire platform "over the next few months." But other 2016 Democrats were quick to pounce on Clinton's proposal. In a memo titled, "What Real Climate Leadership Looks Like," Lis Smith, Martin O'Malley's deputy campaign manager, stressed that the former Maryland governor outlined his clean energy plan last month and has backed up his plan with "action, not just words." "Eschewing the piecemeal, poll-tested 'all of the above' energy strategies of the past, O'Malley has made clear that he will use the full force of his executive power to make the transition to a clean energy future the number one priority of our federal government," Smith wrote. Despite the critics, Clinton's plans was met with warm regard from environmental groups. Tiernan Sittenfeld, an executive for the League of Conservation Voters Action Fund, called Clinton's video "spot on" and said it proved Clinton "will make it a top priority throughout her campaign." "This," Sittenfeld sad, "underscores Secretary Clinton's longtime commitment to confronting the climate crisis." Here is Hillary Clinton’s climate plan <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/here-hillary-clintons-climate-plan> // MSNBC // Alex Seitz-Wald - July 26, 2015 Hillary Clinton will roll out a comprehensive climate and energy policy proposal Monday that would dramatically increase the country’s use of renewable energy. Clinton’s plan, which she will unveil at an energy efficient transit hub in Iowa, will promise to create enough clean renewable energy to power every home in the U.S. within 10 years of Clinton taking office. That includes a 700% increase in solar panel installation by the end of her hypothetical first term, for a total of half a billion installed solar panels. Clinton will also call for a rapid expansion of power generation capacity from wind, hydro, geothermal, and other renewable sources. The former secretary of state will also propose incentives for the technological development of solar and other sources through a number of partnerships and competitions. For instance, she would create a “Solar x-prize” for communities that make it easier to install roof-top panels. And she would create new tax incentives and competitive grants to encourage states and the private sector to invest in clean energy. She will also call for improvements to the electrical grid, expanding renewable energy production on public lands and increase federal R&D funding. “I am setting some really high goals that we are going to meet when I am president,” Clinton said in Ames, Iowa Sunday. Clinton’s plan would also adopt a proposal known as “Deep Decarbonization Pathways,” an international partnership of high-emitting countries that works to find ways to transition industrial countries to low-carbon economies. “The decisions we make in the next decade can make all of this possible or they can keep us trapped in the past,” Clinton said in a video posted to her website previewing the plan. “We cannot wait any longer.” In the video, Clinton also goes after Republicans, listing quotes from top GOP presidential candidates casting doubt on the science of climate change. Billionaire Clinton donor Tom Steyer, who funds his own climate group and is pushing Democrats to be more aggressive on global warming, called Clinton’s plan an “ambitious framework” and said it made her “a strong leader in solving the climate crisis.” Democratic rival Martin O’Malley has already rolled out a plan that he promise would transition the country 100% renewable energy, and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders often says climate change is a top priority. Hillary Clinton Calls Out GOP Climate Change Deniers in New 'Stand With Reality' Video <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-calls-gop-climate-change-deniers-stand/story?id=32701430> // ABC // Liz Kreutz - July 26, 2015 Hillary Clinton today attacked the Republican presidential contenders who deny "the settled science of climate change" and laid out two renewable power goals in a new video that outlines part of her plan to tackle global warming. "It's hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change, who would rather remind us they're not scientists than listen to those who are," Clinton narrates over a graphic that shows quotes from Republican presidential candidates, including Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and Donald Trump. "You don't have to be scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all. You just have to be willing to act," she continues. By contrast, in the video -- titled "Stand with Reality" -- Clinton calls herself "just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain" who knows that "what's happening in the world is going to have a big effect on my daughter and especially on my granddaughter." Clinton then lays out two national goals that she would implement "on day one as president." The first pledge: to have more than half a billion solar panels installed across the country by the end of her first term. And the second: to have the U.S. generate enough clean renewable energy to power every home in America within 10 years. "The decisions we make in the next decade can make all of this possible, or they can keep us trapped in the past," Clinton says. "We cannot wait any longer." On the campaign trail, Clinton repeatedly calls for a "global fight against climate change," which she says is "one of the defining threats of our time." The video, which was posted to her campaign website Sunday night, however, is the first time the Democratic presidential candidate has laid out specific policy proposals on how she would plan to tackle the issue should she become president. While Revealing Climate Plan, Clinton Mum on Keystone <http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/clinton-stays-mum-keystone-when-revealing-climate-plan-n399066> // ABC // Andrew Rafferty – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton pledged Monday to make America "the world's clean energy superpower," but said her former role as secretary of state prevents her from weighing in on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, even as her Democratic opponents stand in firm opposition to it. "No other presidential candidate was secretary of state when this process started," Clinton told reporters in Iowa after laying out her plans to combat climate change. "I'm confident that the pipeline's impact on global greenhouse gas emissions will be a major factor in that decision, as the president has said," Clinton added. "So I will refrain from commenting because I had a leading role in getting that process started." Clinton has refrained from commenting on the pipeline's construction in the past, and her remarks Monday seemed to be a definitive indication that she will not weigh in until the final Obama administration review is complete. Democratic presidential candidates Martin O'Malley and Bernie Sanders have been open about their opposition to the pipeline that would bring oil from Canadian tar sands to the Gulf Coast. "Real leadership is about forging public opinion on issues like Keystone -- not following it," O'Malley deputy campaign manager Lis Smith said. Republicans presidential candidates have called for its construction, saying the pipeline will help create jobs and promote energy independence. In her speech, Clinton laid out two goals she would begin working on her first day as president -- install more than half a billion solar panels across the country by the end of her first term and have the U.S. generate enough clean energy to power every home in America in the next ten years. Clinton's attempts to elevate the issue of climate change in the 2016 election allow her to create a clear distinction with her GOP opponents who have denied or questioned the threat of climate change. A video released by her campaign ahead of the speech featured quotes from a number of her top Republican White House hopefuls expressing skepticism or denial about the existence of global warming. "I refuse to let those who are deniers, who disagree with what we need to do, to rip away all the progress we have made and leave our country exposed to the most severe consequences of climate change," Clinton said. "America needs to lead this fight, not go MIA." Republican National Committee spokesman Michael Short said Clinton's energy agenda is "to raise more taxes and double down on President Obama's EPA overreach," and slammed her for not taking a stance on Keystone. Hillary Clinton Says Climate Plan Will Promote Renewables <http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/Hillary-Clinton-Says-Climate-Plan-Will-Promote-Renewables-318588171.html> // NBC // July 26, 2015 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton planned to unveil a plan Sunday aimed at combating climate change that includes revisions in the tax code to promote renewable energy. In Iowa, the nation's second-leading wind energy producer, Clinton said people are "just not paying attention" if they don't acknowledge climate change. Clinton said she supported renewing the wind energy tax credit and getting other tax incentives "fixed" to promote renewable fuel. Though Clinton hinted that under her plan the coal industry would face changes, she said the federal government would help the industry. Climate change has become a key issue in the Democratic presidential primary, where Clinton is the heavy favorite. Billionaire Tom Steyer has led an effort to promote the issue. Steyer hosted a fundraiser for Clinton in May. "We can make a transition over time from a fossil fuel economy, predominantly, to a clean renewable energy economy, predominantly," Clinton said later during an event at a central Iowa rural home. Changes in the tax code aimed at promoting renewable energy and transitioning away from coal is a tricky political position in key places in the country. Southeast Ohio and western Pennsylvania, states that have been pivotal in recent elections, remain the home of key coal-producing areas. Clinton was making her comments at Iowa State University in Ames and later in Carroll. Clinton said she planned to post the plan on her campaign website at 7 p.m. EDT, and explain it in more detail during an event Monday in Des Moines. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, also seeking the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, noted Sunday that he unveiled a climate change plan in Iowa. Campaign aides to O'Malley said that as governor, he made climate change a top priority, doubled Maryland's renewable fuel production, and reduced greenhouse gases by 10 percent during his two terms. Clinton sets goals for solar panels, clean energy <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/clinton-sets-goals-for-solar-panels-clean-energy/> // CBS // Rebecca Kaplan and Hannah Fraser-Chanpong – July 27, 2015 Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton announced Sunday that her plans to combat climate change as president include installing more than half a billion solar panels across the U.S. by the end of her first term and generating enough clean renewable energy to power every home in America within 10 years of taking office. Clinton, the frontrunner for the 2016 Democratic nomination, announced the goals in a video released by her campaign Sunday evening. Her campaign said the two initiatives were part of a comprehensive energy and climate agenda she'll lay out over the next several months. "Future generations will look back and think 'what were we thinking, how could we possibly be so irresponsible?' " Clinton says as the narrator of a video that features images of children, wildlife, and images associated with energy production. "I'm just a grandmother with two eyes and brain and I know what's happening in the world is going to have a big effect on my daughter and especially on my granddaughter." The video also takes direct aim at the Republican presidential candidates for statements skeptical of climate change. Clinton speaks, the video shows quotes from candidates including former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush ("I'm a skeptic. I'm not a scientist"), Florida Sen. Marco Rubio ("I'm not a scientist") and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz ("There's been no warming whatsoever") and other candidates. "It's hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change who would rather remind us they're not scientists than listen to those who are," Clinton says. "You don't have to be a scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all, you just have to be wiling to act." Clinton argues that increasing the use of wind, solar, hydro, geothermal and other renewable energy will help prevent as many as 3,000 premature deaths and 700,000 asthma attacks each year. Expanding the installation of solar panels across the U.S. would increase the current capacity to 140 gigawatts by the end of 2020, a 700 percent increase her campaign said. It would be like having rooftop solar systems on 25 million houses across the country. A fact sheet released by the campaign offered a number of federal government initiatives Clinton would implement to help reach the goals, including partnerships with states, cities and rural communities that are leading on clean energy, competitive grants to states that exceed federal carbon pollution standards, awards for communities that make it easier and cheaper to install rooftop solar systems, strengthening grid reliability and resilience, and making it easier to get low-cost renewable energy to market. She is also promising to talk about plans to reduce oil consumption in the U.S. and around the world, improve the safety and security of the existing energy infrastructure, make fossil fuel production safer, and protect the health and retirement security of former coal workers and their families. At an event in Iowa Sunday, Clinton said those who don't acknowledge the existence of climate change are "just not paying attention." Iowa is the second-largest producer of wind-generated electricity in the nation, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Clinton's plan follows one laid out by another Democratic candidate, former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, which promises to end the country's reliance on fossil fuels entirely by 2050 and to double American energy efficiency within 15 years. O'Malley promises an entire nation powered by renewable energy within the 35 years, as opposed to Clinton's pledge to power every home with renewable energy in 10 years. Though Clinton has not revealed the full extent of her policies to address climate change, O'Malley said he would deny permits for drilling off the coasts of Alaska and Antarctic and promises not to build the Keystone XL pipeline. Clinton has not yet said what she would do about the pipeline. Clinton's biggest challenger for the Democratic nomination, Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, regularly talks about climate change in his stump speech, describing dire weather conditions created by the warming of the planet. He has not yet laid out a formal plan to combat climate change, although last month he introduced legislation which would provide $200 million in loans and grants for solar panels on public housing and low-income family homes. Hillary Clinton Focuses On Renewable Energy In Climate Change Plan <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-climate-change_55b57138e4b0a13f9d18e4e9?utm_hp_ref=politics> // HuffPo // Marina Fang - July 26, 2015 In an ambitious climate change plan, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton pledged to make sure every American home is powered by renewable energy by 2027 if elected president and install half a billion solar panels around the country before the end of her first term. Her campaign released a copy of the plan Sunday evening. Clinton spoke about climate change at two campaign events in Iowa earlier in the day, telling supporters that climate change deniers are “just not paying attention.” "Those people on the other side, they will answer any question about climate change by saying, 'I’m not a scientist.' Well, I’m not a scientist either. I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain," she said. Clinton’s proposal also calls for promoting tax credits to incentivize a push toward renewable energy and away from coal. "We can make a transition over time from a fossil fuel economy, predominantly, to a clean renewable energy economy, predominantly," she said on Sunday. Clinton plans to address these proposals in more detail at an event on Monday, according to her campaign. The plan is a preview of more specific policy positions that she will announce in the coming months, which will include a Clean Energy Challenge involving competitive grants for states and municipalities to develop and implement renewable energy solutions. On Sunday evening, environmental groups such as the Sierra Club and the League of Conservation Voters quickly issued statements applauding Clinton's plan. Climate change activist Tom Steyer endorsed Clinton's plan in a statement, calling her "a strong leader in solving the climate crisis." “I look forward to other candidates laying out aggressive plans to tackle climate change head-on. It’s time for all leaders to acknowledge the problem our country faces and engage in a robust debate about the best way to tackle climate change and build a clean energy economy," he said. The billionaire founder of NextGen Climate, who hosted a Clinton fundraiser at his San Francisco home in May, called for all of the presidential candidates to develop concrete plans to increase clean energy usage. Steyer said last Friday that he would not support candidates without such proposals. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D), one of Clinton’s challengers in the race, unveiled a climate change plan last month. Responding to Clinton, his campaign noted Sunday that as governor of Maryland, he doubled the state’s renewable fuel production and reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 10 percent. O’Malley and fellow Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) have also been outspoken against the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, while Clinton has largely avoided the issue. Hillary Clinton Pledges to Install 500 Million Solar Panels If Voted President <http://time.com/3972710/hillary-clinton-presidential-election-climate-change/> // TIME // Helen Regan - July 26, 2015 “We are on the cusp of a new era” Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Sunday made tackling climate change one of her key goals were she to enter the White House, pledging to have more than half a billion solar panels installed nationwide by the end of her first term in office. Clinton also called for a major increase in other renewable energy sources, saying she wants every U.S. home to be powered by clean energy within a decade, reports Reuters. “I want more wind, more solar, more advanced biofuels, more energy efficiency,” she said at a weekend rally in Iowa. “And I’ve got to tell you, people who argue against this are just not paying attention.” The two goals were unveiled in a video posted to Clinton’s campaign website Sunday, and are part of a comprehensive agenda on climate change that will be laid out over the next few months. “We are on the cusp of a new era,” she said in the campaign video. “We can have more choice in the energy we consume and produce.” According to the former Secretary of State’s campaign, her climate change agenda will increase output of solar energy by 700% by the end of the decade. On Monday, the presidential candidate will explain her clean energy plan in more detail at a tour of an energy-efficient transit station in Des Moines, Iowa. Hillary Clinton sticks to safe ground on climate <http://www.vox.com/2015/7/27/9045777/hillary-clinton-climate-solar> // Vox // Jonathan Allen – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton unveiled a proposal to combat climate change last night, and it appears to be in the pragmatic Clintonian space of sticking to safe ground. Rather than trying to outdo her Democratic rivals, Clinton's plan seems designed to allow her to contrast with Republicans who either don't acknowledge the reality of climate change or aren't really ready to do anything about it. As Seema Mehta and Evan Halper of the LA Times report, Clinton says her approach would put the US on a path to have all homes and businesses powered by renewable energy by 2027 — a goal her campaign frames as both light on details and far short of where environmentalists would like her to be. The Clinton package is incomplete, however. Unlike her rivals in the Democratic presidential contest, Clinton has yet to take a position on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport oil from the Canadian tar sands to Gulf Coast ports. She also has yet to weigh in on a campaign to ban hydraulic fracturing nationwide, or to take a firm position on offshore oil drilling. The proposal Clinton released Sunday for boosting solar installations by 700% is vague on details about how it would be funded. Clinton continues to enjoy a commanding lead among Democratic primary voters. She seems unconcerned by the more detailed and aggressive proposals offered by challengers within her party. Vox's Brad Plumer writes that Clinton's goal involves a 700 percent increase in solar power between now and 2020 — and concludes that it's possible to achieve that level. US solar capacity grew 418 percent between 2010 and 2014 (it was starting from a small base). So 700 percent growth between 2014 and 2020 is at least within the realm of possibility. But it would require additional policy changes — and clean energy prices would have to keep dropping. Hillary Clinton is calling for a 700% increase in solar power. Is that realistic? <http://www.vox.com/2015/7/26/9044343/hillary-clinton-renewable-solar> // Vox // Brad Plumer - July 26, 2015 In the coming months, Hillary Clinton's campaign is planning to release a series of proposals for dealing with global warming. Her first installment is out Sunday evening, and it calls for a major increase in renewable power. Specifically, she's proposing to boost the amount of wind, solar, and other renewables so that they provide 33 percent of America's electricity by 2027 — enough to power every home in the country: Let's put this in perspective. Renewable energy currently supplies just 13 percent of America's electricity, with hydropower providing 6 percent, wind power providing 4.4 percent, and the rest coming from biomass, geothermal, and solar. Without new policies, the government expects that fraction to rise to 16 percent by 2027. If you add on President Obama's forthcoming Clean Power Plan — an EPA program to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions from power plants — then renewables are projected to grow to 25 percent of US electricity by 2027. Clinton is proposing to bump that up even further, to 33 percent. One key question is how. Clinton's plan calls for a 700% increase in solar power Part of her plan would involve continuing the rapid growth of solar panel installations nationwide. In her proposal, Clinton calls for US solar power to grow 700 percent from current levels: That sounds like a big number, but it's not implausible. After all, US solar capacity grew 418 percent between 2010 and 2014, so 700 percent growth by 2027 is at least within the realm of possibility. It would require the right policies in place (and for solar prices to keep dropping). On that score, Clinton's campaign offered a number of policy proposals for boosting renewables: -- First, if elected president, Clinton would veto any attempts by Republicans in Congress to scrap Obama's Clean Power Plan. This is mostly a defensive maneuver. -- Second, she'd push to extend the federal tax credits for wind and solar that are scheduled to expire soon. (The 30 percent tax credit for residential solar systems is set to disappear in 2016.) This is a key step, but it would depend entirely on Congress. It's not something Clinton could ever do on her own. And note many lawmakers would prefer to let these tax credits sunset, so this proposal is hardly guaranteed. -- Third, Clinton wants to set up a "Clean Energy Challenge" that would gives states and localities incentives to go even further than the carbon standards the EPA is putting out. The campaign says it will offer more details on this in the coming weeks and months. One component? A "Solar X-prize" that would reward communities that figured out how to cut red tape and speed up solar installation times. -- Clinton also has a smattering of proposals to boost public investment in clean energy R&D, in transmission lines, and in renewable installation on public lands. -- Finally, Clinton calls for aid to coal communities that will inevitably suffer if coal continues to decline in favor of cleaner energy sources. No details on this yet, but her campaign notes that the government should "provide economic opportunities for those that kept the lights on and factories running for more than a century." (Note that the Obama administration has proposed a $3 billion aid package for coal communities, but few members of Congress seem interested for now.) How ambitious is Clinton's renewables goal? It depends how you look at it. If the US actually managed to get 33 percent of its electricity from renewables in 2027 and we kept most of our nuclear plants running (which currently supply another 19 percent), then the country would be getting roughly half its electricity from zero-carbon sources. That would obviously be a major shift from where we are today. It's also in line with the "50% clean energy by 2030" goal that green activist and billionaire Tom Steyer is demanding candidates get behind. On the other hand, this isn't, by itself, a comprehensive climate plan. Electricity only accounts for 38 percent of US carbon-dioxide emissions. Other major sources include transportation (i.e., cars, trucks, and planes that burn oil), industrial processes (i.e., cement plants or chemical plants that use coal or gas), homes and buildings that use natural gas for heating, and so on: So boosting renewable electricity is only one part of the picture here. We'll see what else Clinton ends up proposing. Could the US electric grid handle that much wind and solar? This is another big question about Clinton's proposal. As wind and solar expand, US grid operators will face challenges integrating all these intermittent sources of electricity. After all, the sun isn't always blowing and the wind isn't always shining. This is a little hard to answer, just because it would depend on the precise mix of renewables, where the growth in wind and solar occurred, whether utility regulators made certain policy changes, and so forth. But for context, my colleague David Roberts has written an excellent series on the challenges that wind and solar pose to the grid. Part one looks at the hassles of dealing with intermittent renewables. Part two looks at how solar and wind start to face severe economic limitations past a certain point (and Clinton's stated goals would put wind and solar within striking distance of those levels). And part three looks at potential market reforms that could ease these constraints. Definitely read that series if you haven't already. Hillary Clinton's Climate-Change Plan Is Anything But Comprehensive <http://www.newrepublic.com/article/122374/hillary-clintons-climate-change-plan-anything-comprehensive?utm_content=bufferbf7cb&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer> // TNR // Rebecca Leber – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton has unveiled a plan for tackling climate change—or, more accurately, part of a plan, with the promise of additional announcements in the coming months. The Democratic presidential frontrunner detailed a plank of her environmental platform on her website Sunday night, for making the United States "the world’s clean energy superpower.” But on fossil fuels, where environmentalists have remained the most skeptical of her intentions, Clinton's plans remain vague. Clinton announced two ambitious goals: "Have more than half a billion solar panels installed across the country by the end of Hillary's first term"—a 700 percent increase in solar capacity that would power 25 million homes. "Generate enough renewable energy to power every home in America within 10 years of Hillary taking office," which would require expanding renewables (wind, solar, geothermal, and hydropower) enough to power 33 percent of the U.S. electricity sector by 2027, up from just 13 percent today. Campaign chair John Podesta, a former White House senior adviser on climate change, characterized the plan as historic. "Her proposals provide incentives for businesses and individuals to gain access to renewable energy and lower their monthly bills," he wrote Monday. "It pairs national action with a commitment to provide more resources to the groundswell of states and cities that are taking innovative actions above and beyond federal policies." The League of Conservation Voters and Democratic billionaire donor Tom Steyer both praised Clinton's announcement, but she hasn't satisfied all environmentalists' demands for a comprehensive climate action plan. Clinton hasn't said where she stands on the Keystone XL pipeline, tar sands oil extraction, natural gas, fracking, and Arctic drilling. Surely, Clinton's position on these areas will be more controversial than her targets for clean energy. Climate Hawks Vote said in a statement that "Clinton's climate plan is remarkable for what it does't say, yet: no effort to keep fossil fuels in the ground, no price on carbon; no word on Keystone XL, Arctic oil, or other carbon bombs; no word on fracking; no call for adaptation." But by releasing a plan for clean energy, Clinton has achieved two things. First, it helps to blunt environmentalists' criticism of Clinton for her relative silence on the issue. Former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley has a plan to achieve 100 percent renewable electricity by 2050—what "real climate leadership looks like," his campaign declared in a memo to reporters before Clinton's announcement. Senator Bernie Sanders hasn't announced a climate change plan yet, but has supported bills for rooftop solar, opposes Keystone, and overall has (by at least one count) the best environmental record of any senator. Second, Clinton has answered Steyer’s challenge. On Friday, the green donor set his first expectation for candidates wanting his support in the 2016 election, requiring that they first lay out a plan to reach at least 50 percent renewables in the electricity sector by 2030. The Clinton campaign noted on Twitter that it passed Steyer's test, if you count existing nuclear energy, at 19 percent. Steyer's campaign arm NextGen Climate counts nuclear in its 50 percent tally: And Steyer is satisfied with Clinton’s answer, for now. ‘Today, Hillary Clinton emerged as a strong leader in solving the climate crisis and ensuring our country’s economic security,” he said in a statement. “Clinton laid out an ambitious framework to put our nation on a path to a clean energy economy that will create millions of jobs—and in the coming months we look forward to hearing more details about her proposals to tackle climate change.” But Clinton's climate plan can't ignore more difficult questions on how much to rely on fossil fuels during the transition to cleaner power. As Vox's Brad Plumer notes, electricity accounts for 38 percent of U.S. carbon emissions—transportation, buildings powered by gas, industry, and more make up the rest. There's also methane, a particularly potent emission that is on the rise in agriculture, landfills, and the oil and gas sectors. Until she rolls out the rest of her climate platform, Clinton's still vulnerable to criticism from progressive environmentalists. Friends of the Earth spokesperson Ben Schreiber said that "while it is great that Secretary Clinton has recognized the importance of renewable energy, the reality is that her plan will not lead to the transformation that we desperately need. If we are going to avoid the worst impacts of climate change we are going to need an Apollo program for renewable energy, not just the corporate stimulus that Secretary Clinton has offered." Hillary Clinton unveils climate change policy <http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-hillary-clinton-climate-policy-20150726-story.html> // LA Times // Evan Halper and Seema Mehta – July 27, 2015 Hillary Rodham Clinton sought to position herself as a crusader against climate change Sunday by unveiling some robust goals, even as she continued to avoid some of the more contentious battles around global warming. Clinton announced that she will push to vastly expand the number of solar panels installed in the United States, as well as to boost overall renewable energy to the point that it will be able to fuel all homes and businesses by 2027. The proposals reflect Clinton’s commitment to continuing the path on climate change set by President Obama, who champions numerous policies that bolster renewables and push a reduction in fossil fuel consumption. The Clinton package is incomplete, however. Unlike her rivals in the Democratic presidential contest, Clinton has yet to take a position on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport oil from the Canadian tar sands to Gulf Coast ports. She also has yet to weigh in on a campaign to ban hydraulic fracturing nationwide, or to take a firm position on offshore oil drilling. The proposal Clinton released Sunday for boosting solar installations by 700% is vague on details about how it would be funded. Clinton continues to enjoy a commanding lead among Democratic primary voters. She seems unconcerned by the more detailed and aggressive proposals offered by challengers within her party. Clinton’s plan, which campaign officials said is just the first part of a larger platform that will be rolled out gradually, appeared to be aimed squarely at distinguishing her from Republicans. In a campaign video detailing her plan, Clinton said, “It’s hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change, who would rather remind us they’re not scientists than listen to those who are.” As Clinton speaks in the video, quotes from GOP candidates expressing skepticism that global warming is a real threat appear on the screen. Climate change has proved a challenging issue for Republican politicians, many of whom are critical of energy policies aimed at curbing it. Polls show that most voters believe climate change is a real threat and they want action taken. But voters also rarely cite it as their top concern. Hillary Clinton draws contrast with Republicans as she lays out economic plan Hillary Clinton draws contrast with Republicans as she lays out economic plan Regardless, the issue works well for Clinton as she campaigns in Iowa, a leader in wind production. The industry's rapid expansion here has been made possible in large part because of federal tax credits. At a rally before about 400 people in Ames, Clinton cited the wind turbines sprouting on farms across the state. She voiced her support for continuing the wind production credit, saying the nation’s tax code is weighted too heavily in favor of fossil fuels rather than renewable energy. Continuation of such incentives is cited in the brief fact sheet the Clinton campaign distributed Sunday night. It also included programs to award states that are the most aggressive on renewable energy with more federal funding, a reduction in red tape that inhibits the expansion of solar energy and policy changes that would make solar power affordable for low-income households. At the center of this part of Clinton’s energy agenda is a policy recently implemented by Obama. Clinton vows to be a protector of the Clean Power Plan, which puts strict limits on the amount of greenhouse gases power plants can release. Several states have gone to court seeking to block enforcement of the new rules. Clinton also praised coal miners’ contributions to economic growth, a tacit acknowledgment that the shift toward clean energy is viewed skeptically by communities reliant on coal for their livelihoods. Many of those areas, including in battleground states like Ohio, are home to conservative white Democrats crucial to Clinton's White House hopes. “It’s important that we help them transition to a new economy,” she said. “I want to do more to help people in coal country and other parts of our nation that are not enjoying the kind of growth and development and prosperity we’re seeing in a place like Story County,” where the rally was taking place. Some environmentalists are uneasy with Clinton’s approach so far to climate change. They would like to have seen her work as secretary of State to scuttle the Keystone project. Her relationships with donors and advisors connected to large fossil fuel companies make them anxious. And her support during her 2008 presidential run for “clean coal” as a viable, green alternative has not been forgotten. At a town hall event in New Hampshire this month, an activist with 350.org pushed her to commit to banning fossil fuel extraction on public land. Clinton declined to do so, saying such energy production is necessary to keep the economy moving until there are enough alternatives in place. Hillary Clinton Refuses to Take a Position on the Keystone Pipeline <http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2015/07/hillary-clinton-still-wont-take-position-keystone-xl> // Mother Jones // Tim McDonnell – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton took a strong stance on clean energy Monday, telling a crowd in Des Moines, Iowa, that her efforts to tackle climate change would parallel President John F. Kennedy's call to action during the space race in the 1960s. "I want to get the country back to setting big ambitious goals," Clinton said. "I want us to get back into the future business, and one of the best ways we can do that is to be absolutely ready to address the challenge of climate change and make it work to our advantage economically." Her remarks tracked closely with an ambitious plan her campaign released Sunday night, which set a target of producing enough renewable energy to power all the nation's homes and businesses by 2027. "America's ability to lead the world on this issue hinges on our ability to act ourselves," she said. "I refuse to turn my back on what is one of the greatest threats and greatest opportunities America faces." "I think it's bogus," said Bill McKibben. "The more she tries to duck the question, the more the whole thing smells." Still, the Democractic front-runner refused—as she has several times before—to say whether or not she supports construction of the Keystone XL pipeline. That project, which would carry crude oil from Canada's tar sands to refineries and ports in the United States, is seen by many environmentalists as a blemish on President Barack Obama's climate record. It has been stalled for years in a lengthy State Department review that began when Clinton was still Secretary of State. The Obama administration has resisted several recent attempts by Congress to force Keystone's approval, but it has yet to make a final decision on the project—although one is expected sometime this year. "I will refrain from commenting [on Keystone XL], because I had a leading role in getting that process started, and we have to let it run its course," Clinton said, in response to a question from an audience member. Her non-position on Keystone earned derision from environmentalist Bill McKibben, whose organization 350.org has been at the forefront of opposition to the pipeline. "I think it's bogus," he said in an email. "Look, the notion that she can't talk about it because the State Dept. is still working on it makes no sense. By that test, she shouldn't be talking about Benghazi or Iran or anything else either. The more she tries to duck the question, the more the whole thing smells." Clinton also punted on an audience request to reveal further details of how exactly she would finance the renewable energy targets she announced yesterday, which aim even higher than those already put in place by Obama. She reiterated that one key step would be to ensure the extension of federal tax credits for wind and solar energy that have expired or are set to expire over the next few years. And she said that she would continue Obama's practice of pursuing aggressive climate policies from within the White House, saying that "we still have a lot we can do" without waiting for a recalcitrant Congress to act. Clinton acknowledged that the clean energy boom would come at a cost for the US coal industry, which is already in steep decline. She said she would "guarantee that coal miners and their families get the benefits they've earned," but didn't elaborate on what she meant or how specifically she would achieve that. Environmental groups offered a generally positive reaction to Clinton's policy announcement Sunday. In a statement, League of Conservation Voters vice president Tiernan Sittenfield commended her for "calling out climate change deniers and effectively illustrating the urgent need to act on a defining issue of our time." She also earned praise from billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer, who has set a high bar on climate action for any candidate who wants to tap his millions. "I refuse to let those who are deniers to rip away all the progress we've made and leave our country exposed to climate change," Clinton said. Hillary Clinton Just Went Big on Clean Energy. That Was the Easy Part. <http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/07/27/hillary_clinton_s_climate_plans_democratic_hopeful_goes_big_on_clean_energy.html> // Slate // Josh Voorhees – July 27, 2015 At long last, Hillary Clinton has finally given the climate crowd something to get excited about. On Sunday the Democratic hopeful unveiled the first specific plank of what she is promising will be a comprehensive plan to address global warming. Clinton’s bold-faced goals are something to behold: Installing more than half a billion solar panels in the United States by the end of her first term, and generating enough clean energy to power every home in the country within a decade of taking office. Her energy proposal won’t be enough to completely win over climate hawks, who have been skeptical of her environmental bona fides—but it’s a solid start. Climate activists have long demanded that the next president go further than President Obama, and Clinton’s proposal would do just that. In addition to protecting the historic climate rules being implemented by Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency, Clinton is pledging to boost solar, wind, and other renewables to the point where they provide 33 percent of the country’s electricity by 2027. Obama, meanwhile, has put the country on the path to reach about 25 percent by that same year. Exactly how Clinton would get us to her goal remains unclear. But the broad brushstrokes suggest she’d rely heavily on tax incentives to spur the growth of renewables—particularly solar, which she says would see a 700 percent increase in U.S. capacity under her plan. At the center of her proposal is what her campaign has dubbed the Clean Energy Challenge, which would include: grants and “other market-based incentives" to encourage states to go above and beyond the actions required by federal law; a boost to federal investment in clean energy R&D; and an expansion of renewable production on public lands. She’s also expected to push to extend current federal tax credits for solar and wind that are set to expire soon. Clinton’s campaign pegs the estimated cost of the entire plan at about $60 billion over 10 years, which would be offset by eliminating tax breaks for the oil and gas industry. "We need to get the incentives fixed in our tax system, which as you know are too heavily weighted toward fossil fuels," Clinton said Sunday while campaigning in central Iowa ahead of her more formal climate rollout on Monday in Des Moines. My colleague Eric Holthaus will have much more on the policy specifics and how they stack up against the plans already put forth by Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley in a bit. But on the strictly political side of the equation, it’s clear that Clinton’s proposal is clever. She’s telling Americans what she’ll add—rooftop solar for more than 25 million homes!—without having to address the more politically fraught conversation of what she’s willing to subtract. Notably missing from the policy rollout was any mention of blocking Keystone XL, the controversial pipeline that has become a high-profile litmus test for the climate crowd, or a pledge to curb fossil fuel extraction on public lands. Clinton’s got a ways to go before fully captivating the climate hawks. The four-page fact sheet released by her campaign offered only vague promises that her climate policy planks will ensure “that fossil fuel production taking place today is safe and responsible, that taxpayers get a fair deal for development on public lands, and that areas that are too sensitive for energy production are taken off the table.” Until Clinton fills in the blanks on just what is “safe and responsible” and what isn’t, the issue will remain a red flag for Team Green, particularly given Clinton’s previous comments suggesting a much more moderate, let’s-not-move-too-fast approach to issues of drilling and mining. "Hillary Clinton is half the way there," climate activist Bill McKibben said in a statement Monday that made it clear he and his allies will be watching for Clinton to weigh in on offshore drilling in the Arctic and coal mining in the Powder River Basin. For now, though, Clinton has seized some much-needed momentum on an issue she’s had problems with in the past. Not incidentally: Her clean energy proposal appears to pass the clean energy litmus test unveiled late last week by Tom Steyer, the billionaire environmentalist who is expected to spend tens of millions of dollars through his super PAC in the 2016 election. How does Hillary's climate change plan compare to Martin O'Malley's? <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0727/How-does-Hillary-s-climate-change-plan-compare-to-Martin-O-Malley-s> // CS Monitor // Gretel Kauffman – July 27, 2015 Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton revealed her initial plan for addressing climate change while campaigning in Iowa on Sunday, saying that those who don’t acknowledge the issue are "just not paying attention.” "This is not complicated, folks," Ms. Clinton said, speaking to a crowd of more than 200 people at Iowa State University. "I'm just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain. And I know we're facing a huge problem.” To tackle the problem, Clinton proposes, through tax incentives, to increase the amount of power derived from renewable sources such as wind and solar. Recommended: Climate change: Is your opinion informed by science? Take our quiz! "We need to get the incentives fixed in our tax system which as you know are too heavily weighted toward fossil fuels," Clinton said. The former Secretary of State also implied that her plans would impose changes on the coal industry. She credited coal mine workers for having "created an industrial revolution” and stated that "it is important that we help them transition to a new economy." In a video released Sunday night, Clinton named two national goals that she will set if elected president. The first is to have more than half a billion solar panels installed across the country by the end of her first term. The second is that, within a decade, the United States will generate enough clean, renewable energy to power every home in within its borders. "The decisions we make in the next decade can make all of this possible, or they can keep us trapped in the past," Clinton says in the video. "We cannot wait any longer.” Clinton plans to outline her plan in greater detail on Monday. In response to Clinton’s proposals, fellow 2016 Democratic contender Martin O’Malley called attention to his plan, which he says addresses not only consumer energy use, but also industry and transportation. In Mr. O’Malley’s plan, announced just over a month ago, the former Maryland governor said that “a moral obligation to future generations to act immediately and aggressively” required us to transition to a fully clean energy economy by 2050. In his white paper, O’Malley argued that the transition to 100 percent clean energy is the biggest job-creation opportunity the country has seen in a century. He proposes creating a “Clean Energy Jobs Corps” which will work with local communities on energy-saving projects. He criticized the “all-of-the-above” energy policy used by the White House, stating: “We can’t meet the climate challenge with an all-of-­the‐above energy strategy, or from drilling off our coasts, or from building pipelines that bring oil from tar sands in Canada.” O’Malley plans to seek a cap on carbon emissions from all fossil fuel sources, and use proceeds from federal permits to help lower- and middle-class families with job transition assistance. He also said that he would reject projects such as the Keystone XL pipeline. During his two terms as governor of Maryland, O'Malley doubled Maryland's renewable fuel production, and reduced the state’s greenhouse gases by 10 percent. “The fact is, there is no either/or choice between our prosperity and protecting our planet — we can create a future where there are more jobs, and a future with a livable climate,” O’Malley wrote in an op-ed for USA Today. “And there is no future for humankind without a livable climate.” Hillary Clinton has big plans for solar power. Are they achievable? <http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy/2015/0727/Hillary-Clinton-has-big-plans-for-solar-power.-Are-they-achievable> // CS Monitor // David J. Unger – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton sees your plans for a clean-energy future and raises you a few hundred-million solar panels. The Democratic presidential frontrunner rolled out an ambitious plan late Sunday to decarbonize the US power sector, the first of what her campaign says will be a series of energy and climate policy announcements. Although light on details, Mrs. Clinton’s plan sets high targets for renewable energy deployment and goes further than energy policies put in place by President Obama – the first occupant of the Oval Office to take direct executive action on climate change. The plan is an attempt to fend off critics from the left who say the former secretary of state has been slow make climate a part of her campaign. It also puts Clinton in stark contrast to Republican candidates, the majority of whom either avoid discussing mainstream climate science or dismiss it outright. Recommended: Climate change: Is your opinion informed by science? Take our quiz! “I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain, and I know what’s happening in the world is going to have a big effect on my daughter, and especially on my granddaughter,” Clinton says in a video unveiling the climate plan. “It’s hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change – who would rather remind us ‘they’re not scientists’ than listen to those who are.” The US will install more than a billion solar panels by 2020, according to Clinton’s plan, raising total installed capacity from today’s 21 gigawatts to 140 gigawatts. That represents a 700 percent increase over four years. As Vox’s Brad Plumer points out, that’s a big number, but not entirely implausible. Between 2010 and 2014, solar capacity grew by 418 percent, according to the US Energy Information Administration. The plan also calls for the US to generate enough renewables to power every US home by 2027. That equates roughly to generating a third of US electricity from wind, solar, and other renewable sources – up from 13 percent today. It also goes beyond the 25 percent of electricity generation from renewables that is projected to come with President Obama’s proposed Clean Power Plan. That plan, which would regulate carbon emissions from US power plants for the first time in the nation’s history, is being challenged in Congress and in court. If elected president, Clinton says she will defend the plan from its critics. “The Clean Power Plan is a crucial tool in our national strategy to reduce carbon pollution, level the playing field for and increase the deployment of renewable energy, and build a clean energy future,” the campaign’s fact sheet reads. “But smart federal standards set the floor, not the ceiling. We can and must go further.” Deep-pocketed environmentalist donors are expected to play a large role in this election cycle. Billionaire investor and climate activist Tom Steyer has urged presidential candidates to adopt a target of generating half of US power from carbon-free sources by 2030. Clinton’s plan would bring her platform in line with that target or potentially exceed it, assuming nuclear generation remains flat or even grows. The plan is expected to cost around $60 billion, according to a campaign spokesman, to be offset by eliminating tax breaks for the oil and gas industry. The question, then, is whether or not Clinton’s vision is both technically feasible and politically viable. Most analysts suggest that a significant decarbonization of US energy supply over the coming decades would be challenging, but certainly within the realm of possibility. The technology for carbon-free power generation already exists – it’s a matter of deploying those technologies and ensuring they work in harmony to create a stable grid. Indeed, “it is technically feasible to achieve an 80% greenhouse gas reduction below 1990 levels by 2050 in the United States,” according to a joint study released last fall by the consultancy Energy and Environmental Economics, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The study outlines several different pathways to meet that target that rely on different generation mixes and estimates the incremental cost of such an endeavor to be less than 1 percent of US GDP. It’s harder to say whether or not such a plan is politically viable. Cap-and-trade bills that would put a price on carbon have been largely a non-starter in Congress, and executive actions are vulnerable to legal and Congressional challenges. But there are some signs that public support for climate policies is growing, which could shift how presidential candidates view the issue. Forty-six percent of Americans say that global warming is a serious problem, according to a June survey by Pew Research Center. That’s an increase of 13 percentage points from spring of 2013. Hillary Clinton Still Won’t Talk About Keystone <http://www.nationaljournal.com/2016-elections/hillary-clinton-keystone-20150727> // National Journal // Clare Foran – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton has started to roll out what her campaign calls an ambitious agenda to tackle the threat of global warming. But she still refuses to take a stand on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline. The pipeline, which has been under review by the administration for more than six years, has become a flashpoint in a contentious national debate over global warming and the future of American energy security. Environmentalists oppose the project and view Clinton's silence as frustrating and alarming. At an event in Iowa on Monday, Clinton was asked by a reporter if she would take a position on the pipeline now that she has officially entered the race as a 2016 White House contender. Clinton sidestepped the question by saying that the State Department review of the pipeline should be allowed to play out, suggesting that her tenure as secretary of State when the review began disqualified her from weighing in. "I will refrain from commenting because I had a leading role in getting that process started and I think that we have to let it run its course," Clinton said, adding that she is confident that Keystone's impact on global warming will be "a major factor" in the administration's determination of whether or not the pipeline is in the national interest. Since leaving the State Department, Clinton has repeatedly declined to say if she thinks the pipeline should be built. But now that her campaign has started to outline an official climate agenda, environmentalists are hoping that the 2016 Democratic front-runner will break her silence. Martin O'Malley and Bernie Sanders, Clinton's Democratic opponents on the Left, both vocally oppose the construction of the pipeline. But weighing in on Keystone would put Clinton in a tough spot. Environmentalists protest the project but labor unions, a major source of Democratic backing, say that its construction would create jobs. For now, Clinton looks intent on keeping quiet. The Clinton campaign outlined a series of first steps to ramp up renewable energy on Sunday evening and rolled out a video in which Clinton warned that action must be taken now to fight back against the problem of Earth's rapidly rising temperatures. That announcement avoided any mention of the pipeline as well as other controversial issues, such as whether Clinton would support drilling off the Arctic coast. Bill McKibben, the founder of grassroots environmental group 350.org, called on Clinton to say what she thinks about Keystone on Monday before her remarks in Iowa. "Now, we need Clinton to show she understands the other half of the climate-change equation—and prove she has the courage to stand up against fossil fuel projects like offshore and Arctic drilling, coal leasing in the Powder River basin, and the Keystone XL pipeline." Clinton indicated that she would build on President Obama's use of executive action to fight climate change, but added that she believes she may also be able to convince Congress to work with her. "We still have a lot [that we can do] without getting congressional support," Clinton said, adding: "Making this a central issue in my campaign, I hope, will give me the momentum to be able to go to the Congress and say look, cease fire. We need to make the transition, and we can do it and save money at the same time, and create millions of new jobs and businesses that will be to the benefit of our country. "As president, I'll do everything I can to lead us toward that clean-energy future," Clinton said. Here’s How Hillary Clinton Wants to Fight Global Warming <http://www.nationaljournal.com/2016-elections/hillary-clinton-climate-change-20150726> // National Journal // Ben Beman and Clare Foran - July 26, 2015 Hillary Clinton began the closely watched rollout of her energy-and-climate platform Sunday evening by announcing goals that would greatly expand the deployment of renewable power in the coming years. However, the announcement does not address a suite of controversial topics, including whether Clinton supports the Keystone XL pipeline and whether she would allow oil drilling in Arctic waters. But the Clinton campaign emphasized that Sunday's proposal is just part of a broader climate-and-energy agenda that will unfold in the coming months. Clinton's plan calls for more than half a billion solar panels installed across the country by the end of her first term, and having the U.S. generate enough renewable energy to power every home within a decade of the start of a Clinton presidency. Achieving the goals would mean expanding the amount of installed solar-energy generating capacity by 700 percent from current levels by the end of 2020, and adding more green-power generation capacity to the electric grid than any other decade in U.S. history, according to a summary of the plan. According to the Clinton campaign, the clean energy agenda outlined on Sunday would meet the test that environmental mega donor Tom Steyer laid out last week when he called on all candidates to put forward a plan to ramp up renewable and carbon-free energy so that it accounts for more than half of all power generation by 2030. Brian Fallon, a Clinton campaign spokesman, said on Twitter: "Clinton's goal translates to 33% of electricity by 2027. Counting nuclear, as Steyer does, she exceeds his 50% goal." Steyer was quick to praise Clinton while making clear that he hopes to see the 2016 Democratic frontrunner outline additional actions she will take to fight global warming. "Today, Hillary Clinton emerged as a strong leader in solving the climate crisis," Steyer said in a statement, adding: "we look forward to hearing more details about her proposals to tackle climate change." The campaign unveiled the clean-energy pledge by releasing a video and outline of the plan Sunday evening. "Future generations will look back and wonder: What were we thinking? How could we possibly be so irresponsible?" Clinton's voice intones during the video. "I'm just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain, and I know what's happening in the world is going to have a big effect on my daughter and especially on my granddaughter." "You don't have to be a scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all; you just have to be willing to act," Clinton adds. “Exactly what I need as a busy college student."Samantha, StudentSign up form for the newsletter Sunday's rollout is a pivotal political moment in Clinton's relationship to environmentalists, including the more-progressive wing of the movement that has questioned her green bona fides. Some environmentalists are dubious about Clinton's commitment to powerfully confronting global warming and fossil fuels. The more lefty and aggressive sectors of the green movement, such as Vermont activist Bill McKibben, note her lack of a Keystone position. And Clinton has applauded the economic benefits of the nation's fracking-fueled oil and natural-gas boom, and the lower carbon emissions of gas compared to coal, while calling for "smart" regulations. The summary of her plan does not touch on where she may seek to allow or bar development, promising only future information on the topic. There will be a major initiative, the campaign said, on ways to "ensure that fossil fuel production taking place today is safe and responsible, that taxpayers get a fair deal for development on public lands, and that areas that are too sensitive for energy production are taken off the table." Steps to achieve the renewable power goals announced on Sunday include protecting the Obama administration's carbon-emissions standards for power plants, according to the Clinton campaign, as well as new initiatives. That means, a "new partnership with states, cities, and rural communities that are ready to lead on clean energy." This work would include grants and "market-based" incentives to help states cut carbon beyond the standards Obama is imposing and accelerate green-energy deployment. The campaign says Clinton, if elected, would pursue a wide-ranging set of initiatives to expand deployment of renewable energy, such as removing barriers to transmission and fighting to extend green energy tax credits on Capitol Hill, and expanding renewables development on federal lands and buildings, among other steps. Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta, has vowed that Clinton would make climate change and clean energy major themes of her race for the White House. Subsequent announcements will address issues such as reducing oil consumption in the U.S. and around the world, guarding against supply disruptions, and modernizing energy infrastructure, the campaign said. On the heels of Sunday night's announcement, Clinton will tour and give a speech on energy and climate Monday at the Des Moines Area Regional Transit Central Station, which has a "platinum" certification in the U.S. Green Building Council's rating system. Two other contenders for the Democratic nod are appealing to progressive voters with aggressive climate proposals and records of their own. Sen. Bernie Sanders, who has been gaining in the polls and attracting large crowds, has sponsored legislation to impose a tax on carbon emissions. Sanders also is a longtime opponent of the Keystone XL pipeline and has endorsed the movement among some universities, churches, foundations, and other institutional investors to dump their holdings in coal and oil-and-gas companies. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, another Keystone foe, unveiled a broad plan in June. It proposes a mandate to require that all of the nation's electricity come from renewable sources by 2050, while expanding EPA's carbon emissions rules for power plants to cover other large pollution sources and rejecting any expansion of offshore drilling, among other measures. O'Malley, saddled with very low polling numbers, sought to promote his plan ahead of Clinton's announcement Sunday. "Eschewing the piecemeal, poll-tested, 'all of the above' energy strategies of the past, O'Malley has made clear that he will use the full force of his executive power to make the transition to a clean energy future the Number 1 priority of our federal government," his campaign said. Clinton, in her Senate career before becoming secretary of State, drew high marks from the League of Conservation Voters, which carefully tracks lawmakers' votes on a suite of environmental and energy matters. She scored an 82 percent record for her career, though her numbers were dragged down somewhat by missing a number of votes while running for president eight years ago. Coal group slams Clinton energy plan as a 'dog and pony climate show' <http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/249303-coal-group-slams-clinton-energy-plan-as-a-dog-and-pony-climate-show> // The Hill // Devin Henry – July 27, 2015 A coal industry group slammed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s climate change plan as a “dog and pony climate show” on Monday, indicating she could find as little support among fossil fuel interests as President Obama has during his term. “We are disappointed Mrs. Clinton would continue the dog and pony climate show of the current administration instead of protecting the best interests of consumers and our economy,” said American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity spokeswoman Laura Sheehan. “As a purported advocate of everyday Americans, Mrs. Clinton must look beyond political ideology and pursue an energy platform acknowledging the fundamental role coal-based electricity has and will play in keeping the lights on and allowing consumers to reach their full potential.” Clinton released the first plank of her climate change platform on Sunday night, saying she would look to install 500 million solar panels by the end of her first term and ensure there is enough renewable energy to power all American homes within 10 years of taking office. Her campaign said she will look to use tax incentives to expand renewable energy and preserve the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan, a proposed rule that will look to cut carbon emissions at power plants. Coal interests deeply oppose the rule, which could lead to fewer coal-fired power plants around the United States. Industry executives and labor groups alike have opposed the Obama administration’s climate agenda, worrying it will hurt the industry and raise energy prices. “If Mrs. Clinton is serious about keeping Americans out of poverty and protecting our economy, she’ll pursue a commonsense energy platform that includes the role of affordable and reliable coal-based electricity,” Sheehan said. In a fact sheet about her climate plan, the Clinton campaign said she would look to provide economic support to coal workers displaced by declining demand. “Even as we face the threat of climate change head on, we cannot close our eyes to the challenges facing hard-working families in coal country, who kept our lights on and our factories running for more than a century,” she said at a Monday speech in Iowa. “We should guarantee that coal miners and their families get the benefits they’ve earned and the respect they deserve.” Clinton dodges Keystone question <http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/249269-clinton-dodges-keystone-question> // The Hill // Timothy Cama – July 27, 2015 Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton still won’t take a position on the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline. During an Iowa speech on climate change Monday, Clinton refused to weigh in on the project. She argued that because she served as President Obama's secretary of State when the pipeline was under consideration, it would be inappropriate for her to comment. “No other presidential candidate was secretary of state when this process started, and I put together a very thorough, deliberative, evidence-based process to evaluate the environmental impact and other considerations of Keystone,” Clinton said at the Des Moines event. “So I will refrain from commenting, because I had a leading role in getting that process started, and I think that we have to let it run its course,” she continued. Clinton's comments are likely to further infuriate environmentalists, who have criticized her for years for avoiding the project’s controversy and declining to weigh in on oil drilling, hydraulic fracturing or other environmental measures. Late Sunday, Clinton released the first piece of her climate platform, setting goals for solar power and renewable energy installation if she takes the White House. Environmentalists applauded the goals as a good first step, but also say she should provide more detail on what she would do to tackle climate change. For nearly seven years, the Obama administration has been taking various steps to evaluate TransCanada Corp.’s application to build the Keystone pipeline, which would run from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf Coast. Since the pipeline would cross the Canadian border, Clinton took a leading role in the evaluation up until 2013, a role Secretary of State John Kerry is now responsible for. She used the Monday speech to talk further about her climate plan, saying, “America needs to lead this fight, not go MIA.” Clinton also said she would roll back tax incentives that help the oil industry and use them to help clean energy industries. But she dodged a question on whether she would seek to impose a tax on carbon dioxide emissions, saying she would outline later how she’d propose to pay for the expansion of renewable energy sources. Clinton sets climate, renewable power goals <http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/249237-clinton-sets-climate-renewable-power-goals> // The Hill // Timothy Cama – July 26, 2015 Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton late Sunday unveiled a set of goals to expand the use of renewable energy and solar power specifically as part of an effort to fight climate change. As president, Clinton would try to reach a level of 500 million solar panels installed throughout the country, an eightfold increase over the current capacity, by the end of her first term in January 2021. She would also aim to expand renewable power sources to the level that they could provide enough electricity for every United States home by 2027, 10 years after she would take office. Clinton pledged to outline more about her energy and climate platform in the coming months. Those goals, along with a video posted late Sunday, should start to answer frustrated environmentalists, who have been calling for Clinton to take a stand on various green issues since long before she declared her candidacy for president in April. In the video, Clinton called the goals “ambitious” and took an opportunity to criticize her Republican opponents. “Future generations will look back and wonder ‘what were we thinking? How could we possibly be so irresponsible,’ ” Clinton says in the video. “It’s hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change, who would rather remind us they’re not scientists than listen to those who are,” she says, referring indirectly to presidential hopefuls, such as Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who have declared themselves not to be scientists. “You don’t have to be a scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all,” Clinton says. “You just have to be willing to act.” Clinton also promised Sunday to defend President Obama’s landmark carbon dioxide limits for power plants, along with other smaller actions. Greens have started to rally around Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) as the Democratic nominee, citing his leadership role on many of their priorities, such as opposing the Keystone XL pipeline, a project on which Clinton has still not taken a position. In addition to Keystone, Sunday’s announcement doesn’t confront Clinton’s past positions on oil drilling or hydraulic fracturing, which have been among greens’ top gripes with her. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley (D) has also been in front of Clinton on climate, saying in June that he would push for all of the country’s electricity to come from renewable sources by 2050. It’s unclear if Clinton’s goals would align with the demands of billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer, who has pledged to donate only to candidates whose climate platforms would lead to half of the country’s electricity coming from renewables by 2030. Hillary Clinton outlines climate change plan <http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-outlines-climate-change-plan/article/2569004> // Washington Examiner // Zack Colman – July 17, 2015 Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton laid out a climate plan Sunday that aim to get half of all electricity generated in the United States from zero-carbon sources within 10 years. Under the plan, Clinton said one-third of power a decade after taking the White House — were she to win the presidency — would come from renewable sources, enough to power every U.S. home. Once combined with existing nuclear power, which doesn't emit carbon, more than half of the nation's electricity would come from zero-emitting sources. The strategy comes on the heels of pressure from Democratic rivals seeking the White House bid who have darted to the ex-secretary of state's left on climate change. It also comes after billionaire climate activist Tom Steyer prodded candidates Friday to offer detailed plans to get at least half of the nation's power from energy sources that don't emit greenhouse gases. Shooting for that 50 percent mark underscores the Steyer's rising profile in the Democratic politics along with how central climate change has become for the party as a potential wedge issue with Republicans — only one GOP candidate so far has endorsed scientists' findings that humans are largely the cause of a warming planet. "Today, Hillary Clinton emerged as a strong leader in solving the climate crisis and ensuring our country's economic security. Clinton laid out an ambitious framework to put our nation on a path to a clean energy economy that will create millions of jobs — and in the coming months we look forward to hearing more details about her proposals to tackle climate change," Steyer said in a statement through his super PAC, NextGen Climate Action. Steyer already has hosted a fundraiser for Clinton. He hasn't yet said publicly how much he wants to spend in 2016, though it's expected to surpass the $57 million Steyer spent on the 2014 election. Meanwhile, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and ex-Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley have competed for a slice of the liberal environmental base that was a key voting bloc for President Obama in part by touting climate and energy policies sought by the Democratic Party's progressive wing. Progressives have continued to press Clinton for more details about her climate strategy and have been wary of her credentials, citing her resistance to comment on whether she'd OK the Keystone XL oil sands pipeline. Clinton has said she doesn't think it would be proper to comment on the Canada-to-Texas project because she presided over its application while at Foggy Bottom. Clinton's team said she would "make it a top priority to fight efforts to roll back the Clean Power Plan," the signature Obama administration climate regulation that's due to be finalized this summer. A growing number of states have signaled they won't comply with the regulation, which seeks to limit carbon emissions from power plants, and it's been in congressional Republican crosshairs for months. The Clinton campaign also said it would prioritize investment in electric transmission infrastructure, push to extend clean energy tax credits while making them "more cost effective," and try to link up half a billion homes with solar power by the end of a prospective first term, increasing total solar capacity by 700 percent, up to 140 gigawatts. The strategy also calls for increasing renewable energy production on federal land and expanding clean energy investment in rural communities. Clinton also looked to shore up support from the Democratic Party's centrists by saying any climate push should include a plan for ensuring coal communities don't fall by the wayside — a plan for which the campaign said would come at a later date. Much of the opposition to Obama's climate agenda comes from coal-heavy states, as they say regulations will put people out of business. Other parts of Clinton's energy platform will be coming in the ensuing month, her team said. Plans for updating energy infrastructure, reducing global oil consumption and for pursuing "safe and responsible production" of fossil fuels are on the docket. Hillary Clinton talks big on climate change but silent on Keystone XL <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/27/hillary-clinton-talks-climate-change-mum-keystone/> // Washington Times // S.A. Miller – July 27, 2015 Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton’s move to cozy up to the party’s environmentalists came up short Monday when she again refused to take a position on the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline. Mrs. Clinton said that she couldn’t offer an opinion because she helped establish the approval process for the controversial cross-country pipeline when she was President Obama’s secretary of state. “No other presidential candidate was secretary of state when this process started, and I put together a very thorough, deliberative, evidence-based process to evaluate the environmental impact and other considerations of Keystone,” Mrs. Clinton said at an event in Des Moines, Iowa, where she outlined her plan to fight climate change. “I will refrain from commenting, because I had a leading role in getting that process started, and I think that we have to let it run its course,” she said. U.S. approval of the pipeline has been stymied since Mr. Obama took office. Environmentalists fiercely oppose the Keystone XL pipeline, which would run from Canada to Nebraska and hook up with existing pipelines to the Gulf Coast, and have made opposition to it a litmus test for Democratic presidential candidates. Mrs. Clinton had already come under fire for rolling out a climate change agenda that featured ambitious goals to “decarbonize” America but lacked details about how she would accomplish it. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, who is waging a long-shot bid for Democratic presidential nomination, pounced on Mrs. Clinton. “Governor O’Malley is opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline because we can’t move to a clean energy future if we continue to rely on dirty, short-term fossil fuel fixes,” said O’Malley campaign manager Lis Smith. “Real leadership is about forging public opinion on issues like Keystone — not following it. Every Democrat should follow his lead and take a stand to commit to ending our reliance on fossil fuels.” <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/26/hillary-clintons-climate-change-goals-include-plan/> Hillary Clinton’s climate change goals include plan to ‘decarbonize’ America <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/26/hillary-clintons-climate-change-goals-include-plan/> // Washington Times // S.A. Miller - July 26, 2015 Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton entered the climate change debate Sunday, setting ambitious goals to “decarbonize” America and blasting her Republican rivals for ignoring scientists who warn of a looming disaster from global warming. Mrs. Clinton announced what she described as the first pillars of a comprehensive energy and climate agenda with a three-minute Web video that presented a montage of scenes of children on playgrounds, farmland and windmills juxtaposed with footage of wildfires, a blazing sun and flood damage. “I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain, and I know what’s happening in the world is going to have a big effect on my daughter and especially on my granddaughter,” Mrs. Clinton said in her narration for the video. Mrs. Clinton promised that, if elected president, she would set two goals to fight climate change: increase the number of solar panels by more than 500 million across the country by the end of her first term and set a 10-year goal of generating enough renewable energy to power every single home in America. Mrs. Clinton’s goals served as her opening bid to satisfy the Democratic Party’s liberal base, which wants a more aggressive effort on climate change and environmentalism than President Obama has been able to muster. Mrs. Clinton’s liberal opponents for the nomination, most significantly Sen. Bernard Sanders of Vermont, already have staked out tough stances and made the issue a centerpiece of their campaigns. The campaign manager for Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley responded with a memorandum that did not name Mrs. Clinton but highlighted the former Maryland governor’s long-standing plan to combat climate change and make the country 100 percent powered by renewable energy by 2050. The memo stressed that the climate change issue needed “actions, not just words,” and referenced Mr. O'Malley’s longtime opposition to the Keystone XL cross-country oil pipeline, which is the bane of environmentalists. Mrs. Clinton has not taken a public stand on the pipeline. Mr. O'Malley has forcefully challenged Mrs. Clinton from the left on a host of issues but has failed to gain traction in the polls, slipping further into the single digits as Mr. Sanders, a self-identified socialist, has gained steam with his own agenda. The Clinton campaign said the former first lady, senator and secretary of state would discuss more of her plan to increase renewable energy sources and address climate change Monday after a tour at the green-energy certified Des Moines Area Regional Transit (DART) Central Station in Iowa. To achieve her goals on climate change, Mrs. Clinton would launch a “clean energy challenge” that forms a partnership with states, cities and rural communities that are ready to lead on clean energy, according to the campaign. The challenge will include: • Competitive grants and other market-based incentives to empower states to enact carbon pollution standards tougher than the federal government’s and accelerate clean energy deployment. • Awards for communities that successfully cut the red tape that slows rooftop solar installation times and increases costs for businesses and consumers. • Work with states, cities and rural communities to strengthen grid reliability and resilience, increase consumer choice and improve customer value. • Expand the Rural Utilities Service and other successful USDA programs to help provide clean, reliable, and affordable energy, not just to rural Americans but to the rest of the country as well. The campaign said Mrs. Clinton also would fight efforts to roll back the Clean Power Plan, a proposed rule by the Environmental Protection Agency that would cut carbon emissions from power plants and is being challenged in court. In the video, Mrs. Clinton called out eight Republican presidential candidates for either denying climate change or claiming they couldn’t judge whether climate change exists because they are not scientists. The screen was filled with the text of quotes from former Sen. Rick Santorum, Sen. Rand Paul, Sen. Marco Rubio, real estate mogul Donald Trump, former Gov. Jeb Bush, former Gov. Rick Perry, Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. John Kasich. “It’s hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change. Who would rather remind us they’re not scientists than listen to those who are,” Mrs. Clinton said. “You don’t have to be a scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all; you just have to be willing to act.” Mrs. Clinton said Republicans were stuck in the past and she was offering leadership for the future and the opportunity to make America a “clean energy superpower,” which is a phrase she has used repeatedly on the campaign trail. “We’re on the cusp of a new era. We can have more choice in the energy we consume and produce. We can create a more open, efficient and resilient grid that connects us, empowers us — improves our health and benefits us all,” she said in the video. “The decisions we make in the next decade can make all of this possible, or they can keep us trapped in the past. We cannot wait any longer. It’s time we stand for a healthier climate, stand for cleaner air, for science, innovation, for our children, for reality, for the future.” Hillary Clinton's climate change policy pitch: install half a billion solar panels <http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/27/hillary-clinton-climate-change-policy-solar-panels> // Guardian // Suzanne Goldenberg – July 27, 2015 Barack Obama ran for president promising to save the planet. Hillary Clinton is promising to help people save money on their electricity bills. In the first big reveal of her climate change policy, Clinton said she would install half a billion new solar panels by the end of her first term in the White House, and generate enough renewable energy to power every home in the country 10 years after her inauguration. “Not some homes. Not most homes. Every home in America,” she said in a speech on Monday at the main bus terminal in Des Moines. The Democratic frontrunner for the 2016 presidential nomination cast climate change as one of the most urgent threats of our time – but she was also careful to raise the prospect of freeing Americans from their monthly utility bills as part of the solution. “I personally believe climate change is a challenge of such magnitude and urgency that we need a president who will set ambitious goals,” Clinton told reporters. The first such goal articulated by Clinton, set out in a video posted on her campaign website on Sunday night, called for installing half a billion new solar panels in her first term. Clinton set a target of generating 33% of America’s electricity from renewable sources, a more ambitious target than Obama. But Clinton declined to stake out her position on the big decisions confronting the next president on climate change: Arctic drilling, fracking, oil and gas exports, and the hot button issue for Obama and Clinton, during her time as secretary of state: the future of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. Clinton’s earlier position on Keystone – she said five years ago she was inclined to approve the project – has made her a target of environmental campaigners. She was heckled at an event in New Hampshire earlier this month when she refused to endorse a ban on oil and gas drilling on public lands “until we get alternatives in place”. She managed to win over some campaigners on Monday, but only somewhat, and she was rebuked by the country’s main coal lobby. Michael Brune, the Sierra Club’s executive director, said he was “thrilled” with Clinton’s renewable electricity goal, and her promise to defend Obama’s clean power plan. But Bill McKibeen, the founder of the 350.org campaign group, said: “Hillary Clinton is half the way there.” McKibben said Clinton had made a “credible commitment” to renewable energy, but she could not dodge the difficult decisions ahead on Arctic drilling and coal extraction – let alone the Keystone pipeline . “At the end of the day, growth in renewables doesn’t mean enough if we’re simultaneously kicking the decarbonization can down the road with more pipelines and more extraction on public lands,” McKibben said. Clinton’s reticence did not spare her criticism from the main coal lobby, Americans for Clean Coal Electricity, which said it was disappointed she “would continue the dog and pony climate show of the current administration”. Other campaigners noted Clinton’s failure to spell out how she would defend Obama’s clean power plant rules – the pillar of his climate change plan – from attacks by Congress and the courts. She was unclear about how she would would pay for her ambitious climate plan – given a Republican-controlled Congress that has been hostile to funding requests for energy and research. “A lot of these changes will pay for themselves. There will be front end money needed,” she told reporters. “But there are ways of making those investments and getting a big return on those investment that will be to the benefit of the American taxpayer.” But Clinton’s first big moment on the environment showed a candidate determined to couch climate change in the populist economic rhetoric of her campaign. Obama, on the campaign trail, promised to save a “planet in peril”, and in the White House proposed climate measures that would save the equivalent in carbon pollution of shuttering multiple coal plants or taking millions of cars off the road. Clinton in contrast said her plan would result in the equivalent of rooftop solar on 25 million American homes – which was a more populist approach, said Paul Bledsoe, who headed the White House climate change taskforce under Bill Clinton. “There is a subtle message in here that her renewable energy plan will help consumers break free of utilities while helping to deal with climate change,” said Bledsoe. “It is explicitly framed in populist language.” Rooftop solar grew by 76% last year a wave propelled by the plummeting prices of panels and government policy. However, those pricing policies are under a sustained attack by some two dozen front groups and utility companies operating in 27 states, according to the Energy and Policy Institute. Hillary Clinton's Solar Pledge: 'Ambitious but Realistic' <http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/07/27/hillary-clintons-solar-pledge-ambitious-but-realistic-experts-say> // US News // Alan Neuhauser – July 27, 2015 A potential center of the U.S. political solar system plans to harness the sun. Hillary Clinton, former secretary of state and 2016 Democratic presidential hopeful, pledged Sunday to install more than 500 million solar panels by the end of her first term and to generate enough renewable energy to power every American home within 10 years of taking office. The plan, which experts call “ambitious but realistic,” would increase the country’s solar capacity by 700 percent by 2020, potentially allowing the nation to draw a third of its electricity from renewable sources by 2027. It is the first in a series of expected announcements on energy and climate change this week, according to the Clinton campaign. "We’re on the cusp of a new era,” Clinton said in a statement on her campaign website announcing the pledge. “We can create a more open, efficient, and resilient grid that connects us, empowers us, improves our health, and benefits us all." Solar provided less than 1 percent of the electricity generated in the U.S. last year, but its growth has been nothing short of explosive, powered both by falling prices and federal tax incentives. Since 2013, solar markets have expanded by about 36 percent a year. Clinton’s plan would push that up to about 42 percent. “It’s a lot: The U.S. would have to install about 2.5 times as much solar during her first term as it has in all of its history before that. So that’s a ton of growth,” says Shayle Kann, senior vice president at GTM Research. “That said, the growth rate is more or less in line with what we’re seeing now.” While solar has dropped in price, and financing vehicles from companies like Solar City allow homeowners to install panels without spending any money upfront, Clinton’s plan ultimately hinges on tax credits and subsidies – one of which, an investment credit for buying and installing solar panels, is set to expire in 2016. “That’s the biggest challenge,” Kann says. “In Congress, getting anything passed is hard these days. Because the default scenario is expiration, that’s a big lift.” Republicans, meanwhile, were quick to criticize the approach. “Hillary Clinton’s energy ‘plan’ is to raise more taxes and double down on President Obama’s EPA overreach, which held down wages and cost American jobs,” Republican National Committee spokesman Michael Short said in a statement. Trade and advocacy groups representing the coal, oil and natural gas sectors – some of the biggest donors in U.S. politics, and traditionally larger contributors to Republican candidates – have rejected or even undermined climate change research. Only one GOP candidate, for example, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, has acknowledged the existence of human-induced global warming, a fact overwhelmingly supported by science. Clinton’s Sunday announcement, however, likely will not alienate potential industry donors, experts say – at least during the primary as she faces challenges from more liberal candidates such as former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley and Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders. “This is clearly not going to hurt her with those groups in securing the Democratic nomination, because anything she might say is going to be outflanked by a Sanders or an O’Malley,” says Barry Rabe, a professor at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. “I don’t know that there’s going to be a huge outcry over this.” The announcement doesn’t exactly rival in ambition President John F. Kennedy’s pledge in 1961 to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade. But, Kann, says, “it’s a good campaign target. It’s ambitious, but it’s not outside the realm of possibility.” Why Hillary Clinton could be the solar industry's new best friend <http://fortune.com/2015/07/27/hillary-clinton-solar-industry/> // Fortune // Katie Fehrenbacher – July 27, 2015 The presidential candidate is calling for huge growth in the solar sector, and that would require some big federal help. Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton released an ambitious plan to boost U.S. clean energy and fight climate change. The vision, which also lacked details, called for more than a half billion solar panels, or about 140 gigawatts of solar, to be installed in the U.S. by 2020, and enough clean energy to power all homes by 2027. But to deliver on her big goals, a federal government under her watch would have to maintain and implement a variety of clean power initiatives that are far from certain. She’d have to extend an important solar tax incentive that is set to shrink the year she would take office, and she’d have to aggressively fight for Obama’s highly controversial Clean Power Plan that would cut carbon emissions from power plants. If she accomplishes these goals she could end up being a massive ally to the solar industry in the U.S. Without these federal policies, the solar sector faces closer growth because the government incentives that have helped to fuel a portion of its rapid growth in recent years are starting to be phased out. Let’s look at the numbers behind Clinton’s clean energy plan. Clinton calls for 140 gigawatts worth of solar panels in the U.S. by 2020, which is a seven-fold increase from the current 21.12 gigawatts, according to data from GTM Research. A gigawatt is about the equivalent energy of a large natural gas plant. GTM Research analysts predict that with current U.S. policies, there would be just over a three-fold increase to 70 gigawatts of solar panels installed by 2020. That’s about half of what Clinton is calling for. What makes up the difference? One of the main ones is uncertainty around what will happen with the investment tax credit, or the ITC, which delivers a 30% federal tax credit to solar project developers. Bloomberg analyst Jacqueline Lilinshtein describes federal policies like solar tax credits as “the single most important drivers of growth over the past few years.” But the problem is that the federal tax credit is set to decline at the end of 2016, and Clinton would take office at the beginning of 2017. At that point the tax credit is supposed to ramp down to a 10% tax credit. Many in the solar industry assume that the tax credit will not be renewed, although it has been in the past. The industry’s increasing maturity makes congress less likely to intervene with a gradual reduction that has been planned for years. Will Clinton make it a priority to extend the solar tax break? Well, because she would only take office after it’s already expired, she would have to rally congress to re-instate it. In her release she says part of her clean energy plan includes: “Tax Incentives: Fight to extend federal clean energy incentives and make them more cost effective both for taxpayers and clean energy producers.” The CEO of big home solar installer SolarCity, Lyndon Rive, said in an interview that Hillary Clinton is “a leader that understands we have to change.” While he’s operating his business on the assumption that the tax break will not be extended, he said “it’ll be a shame,” and “bad policy” if it’s phased out. Rive argued that the fossil fuel industry should be taxed rather than getting a number of breaks, as is the current reality. Polluters should be taxed, he said, while industries that aren’t should get benefits. Beyond the solar tax incentives, there’s the Clean Power Plan, the Obama administration’s proposal to use the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from the power industry under the Clean Air Act. In essence the EPA, which will be finalizing the rules for the plan later this summer, would regulate carbon emissions the way it does air pollution. Electric power generation from coal and natural gas plants is responsible for 40% of U.S. carbon emissions. Under the Clean Power Plan, states would have flexibility in how they meet carbon reduction goals. States with large coal industries might want to focus on capturing carbon emissions from the plants. Meanwhile, states with ample sunshine might want to encourage solar industries to set up shop and grow. But the Clean Power Plan is highly controversial. Critics say it unfairly targets coal industry states and will mean higher energy bills for consumers. Clinton says in a release that she will make it “a top priority” to fight the efforts to roll back the Clean Power Plan. She calls it a “crucial tool” in the nation’s strategy to curb carbon emissions. While the federal government is a primary driver of clean energy in the U.S., solar is a highly regional industry. California and the U.S. Southwest are the biggest markets in part because of strong state and local incentives. To help state and local clean energy plans, Clinton says she will establish a “Clean Energy Challenge,” which will create better partnerships between the federal governments and states and cities. Beyond any policies, the U.S. solar industry has grown rapidly in recent years thanks to the dropping costs of solar panels and installation. Bloomberg’s Lilinshtein describes solar as having “moved from a niche product to the mainstream” and says that federal subsidies won’t necessarily be required in the industry to maintain strong growth. But delivering the huge growth that Clinton is calling for will likely need these federal subsidies. Analysts and solar industry execs agree, though, Clinton’s numbers aren’t all that crazy if helped by strong federal support. SolarCity’s Rive says that the plan is “is absolutely achievable.” Lilinshtein describes it as “an aggressive target but certainly in the realm of possibility.” GTM Research analyst Shayle Kann explains it as “a perfect target: ambitious but possible.” Hillary Clinton just released this bizarre video bashing 'mad scientist' GOP candidates on climate change <http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-releases-climate-change-video-2015-7> // Business Insider // Colin Campbell – July 27, 2015 Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign found a creative way to highlight how her position on climate change contrasts with the GOP field. Clinton's team released a video on Monday that is reminiscent of old movies like "Frankenstein," featuring clips of Republican candidates questioning the science of climate change. The video pokes fun at Republicans who, in response to questions about global warming, say that they're not scientists. "REPUBLICANS REPEAT ONE CHILLING PHRASE," the video declares amid faux-scary music. "FEEL THE TERROR AS THEY DENY ESTABLISHED SCIENCE. ... AND THE SCARIEST PART? ONE OF THESE MAD (NOT A) SCIENTISTS COULD BE PRESIDENT!" The Republicans included in the ad were former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R), Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida), former Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R), Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R), former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pennsylvania), Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), former Hewlett Packard Carly Fiorina, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R), and real-estate mogul Donald Trump. In the video, some of the GOP candidates directly expressed doubt that global warming is a human-caused crisis, while others simply said the US alone can't solve the problem. Clinton gave a speech earlier in the day declaring that climate change is one of the most "urgent threats of our time." She also pledged have more than half a billion solar panels across the country installed by the end of her first term as president. View her campaign's video below: Enough renewables to power “every home in America”: Hillary Clinton goes big on green energy <http://www.salon.com/2015/07/27/enough_renewables_to_power_every_home_in_america_hillary_clinton_goes_big_on_green_energy/> // Salon // Lindsay Abrams – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton is not a scientist. She is, as she explains in a new campaign video, “a grandmother with two eyes and a brain” — and, we could add, a need to prove she’s able to lead on climate change. Sunday evening, the Democratic presidential candidate offered an early indication of how she intends to do that: with a major, ten-year push to boost renewable energy. On her first day as President, Clinton promised, she’d set two ambitious goals for the U.S.: one, to install more than half a billion solar panels, across the country, by the end of her first term; and two, to be generating enough renewable energy to power every home in America in just ten years’ time. The goals, as stated, can certainly be characterized as ambitious. Clinton’s vision for solar panels, according to the campaign, would represent a 700 percent increase in solar capacity from its current levels, or the equivalent of adding solar panels to 25 million American homes. And the renewables push she describes, involving a combination of wind, solar, hydro, geothermal and “other forms of renewable energy” would require adding more power capacity to the grid by 2027 than has been accomplished in any previous decade — and would represent a big leap forward from President Obama’s plan of tripling renewable energy production, to 20 percent, by 2030. Clinton’s yet to come forward with many details for what she’s calling her “Clean Energy Challenge.” But to begin with, she’s doubling down on her support for the EPA’s power plant rule, the final version of which is expected to be released soon, and says she’s committed to protecting it from “attacks from climate change deniers.” She also intends to bolster the green energy industry through the expansion of tax incentives. The unveiled plan did go relatively easy on the fossil fuel industry: Clinton pledged to “ensure that fossil fuel production taking place today is safe and responsible” and that “areas that are too sensitive for energy production are taken off the table,” although she didn’t comment specifically on hot button issues like offshore and Arctic drilling, both of which Obama has permitted, and which Democratic primary contenders Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley have vocally opposed. And she’s — still — yet to take a stance on the Keystone XL pipeline, which more than anything else would stand as a symbolic indicator of her intent to go all-in on climate action. But on the climate denial front, she’s got the rhetoric down pat. “It’s hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change, who would rather remind us they’re not scientists than listen to those who are,” she says in the video. “You don’t have to be a scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all. You just have to be willing to act.” Hillary Clinton Just Released Her First Major Climate Change Proposals <http://mic.com/articles/122936/hillary-clinton-just-released-her-first-major-climate-change-proposals> // Mic // Zeeshan Aleem – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton has released the first two major policy proposals for her vision for tackling climate change and ensuring the United States' primacy as the "world's clean energy superpower." The plan, which she announced through a video released on Sunday, sets forth two enterprising goals. Her first commitment is a pledge to have more than half a billion solar panels installed across the country by the end of her first term in office. Her second objective is to power every home in the U.S. with clean renewable energy within a decade of her arrival in the White House. The Clinton campaign also outlines her plan to form a "Clean Energy Challenge" that would create a network of partnerships between the federal government and states, cities and smaller communities to incentivize investment in renewable energy with grants. The proposals are only the first of a number of climate policy commitments expected to emerge from Clinton's campaign in the coming months, but already some progressive outfits have responded with cautious optimism to her opening rhetoric. The plan: Clinton's solar panel agenda would boost the amount of installed solar capacity by 700% by 2020 — the same as "rooftop solar systems on over 25 million homes," according to the campaign. Her commitment to increasing the amount of renewable energy in the U.S. would double the share of renewables in overall power generation. Currently, renewable energy accounts for about 16% of total power generation in the country; Clinton's 10-year plan would increase that to 33% by 2027. Clinton's camp points out that that's eight percentage points higher than called for under the Obama administration's forthcoming "Clean Power Plan." In her video announcing the proposals, Clinton takes aim at Republicans who deny climate change and singles out Jeb Bush's comment saying "I'm not a scientist" before describing himself a "skeptic" of global warming. "It's hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change — who would rather remind us they're not scientists than listen to those who are," Clinton says in the video. "You don't have to be a scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all, you just have to be willing to act." The reaction: Clinton's message was received fairly well by a number of players in the climate policy field. Tom Steyer, the head of NextGen Climate, offered vague but warm encouragement on Clinton's ideas in a statement issued by the Clinton campaign: "Today, Hillary Clinton emerged as a strong leader in solving the climate crisis and ensuring our country's economic security. Clinton laid out an ambitious framework to put our nation on a path to a clean energy economy that will create millions of jobs." Steyer's opinion carries weight for Democratic candidates: His support is accompanied by vast amounts of cash. Steyer is a former hedge fund manager and was the single biggest public spender in the 2014 elections. According to the New York Times, in order to win the backing of his super PAC, a candidate "must pledge to enact an energy policy that would lead to the generation of half the nation's electricity from renewable or zero-carbon sources by 2030... and 100% from clean sources by 2050." When combined with nuclear energy, Clinton's 10-year plan for growing renewable energy more than meets Steyer's 2030 benchmark, as Clinton press secretary Brian Fallon pointed out on Twitter: Some other climate policy groups praised Clinton's stance on renewable energy, but emphasized that she has yet to prove her mettle on combating fossil fuels. "Clinton is half the way there — this is a credible commitment to renewable energy, and a recognition that the economics of electricity are changing fast," 350.org co-founder and climate change activist Bill McKibben said in a statement emailed to Mic. "Now, we need Clinton to show she understands the other half of the climate change equation — and prove she has the courage to stand up against fossil fuel projects like offshore and Arctic drilling, coal leasing in the Powder River basin, and the Keystone XL pipeline. Because at the end of the day, growth in renewables doesn't mean enough if we're simultaneously kicking the decarbonization can down the road with more pipelines and more extraction on public lands." In the past, Clinton has angered green activists with her work on a variety of climate-related issues. But this time around, it seems like her campaign is off to a decent start on the issue. In climate change plan, Hillary Clinton makes big bet on solar power <http://mashable.com/2015/07/27/hillary-clinton-climate-energy-plan/> // Mashable // Andrew Freedman – July 27, 2015 In a speech in Iowa on Monday, Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton began laying out what she says will be a forward-thinking, "ambitious" set of policy proposals and goals to address the threat of manmade global warming. She does so as she faces a primary challenge from Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and former Maryland governor Martin O'Malley, who both have progressive records on global warming. Clinton declared two goals, both of which involve a significant ramp up of renewable energy use in the U.S. The first goal is for the country to have "more than half a billion solar panels" installed in the U.S. by the end of Clinton's first term in office, which would be in 2020. The second goal also centers on solar power, which has been expanding rapidly in recent years as the cost of manufacturing and installing solar panels has plummeted. Clinton said she wants the U.S. to generate enough renewable electricity to power every single home in the country within a decade. These goals, which were first announced on Clinton's campaign website on Sunday night, would involve a 700% increase in installed solar capacity, which is equal to having rooftop solar systems on more than 25 million homes, the Clinton campaign stated in a fact sheet. The policy proposals, the campaign stated, would put the country on a "deep emission reduction" pathway by the year 2050. “The reality of climate change is unforgiving no matter what the deniers say,” Clinton said during an appearance at an environmentally-friendly transit station in Des Moines. Since declaring their candidacy, none of the Republican presidential candidates have voiced support for the scientific consensus on climate change, which is that the world's climate is warming mainly due to manmade emissions of greenhouse gases. Scientists say that this year, in fact, is likely to be the warmest on record. Clinton pledged to defend President Obama's EPA climate regulations, known as the Clean Power Plan, which is the central component of the current administration's goal of cutting global warming pollutants, such as carbon dioxide, to 26 to 28% below 2005 levels by 2025. That regulations are under attack in the courts and on Capitol Hill. “I will defend President Obama’s Clean Power Plan,” she said. “I refuse to let those who are deniers … to rip away all that we’ve managed to do,” she said. Clinton also said she would reduce economic incentives, such as tax breaks, for oil production and "extend incentives instead for clean energy." As secretary of state, Clinton helped lead America's climate negotiations at the Copenhagen Summit in 2009, which failed to produce an ambitious agreement that contained binding emissions reductions worldwide. Many climate activists considered that summit to be a bitter disappointment. Still, Clinton touts the non-binding Copenhagen Accord as a diplomatic accomplishment on her website. The Accord, which was the first time that developing nations such as China agreed to take action to reduce their emissions, paved the way for a new climate treaty to be negotiated in Paris this year. Clinton's record at those climate talks may come back to haunt the U.S. in Paris, however. In Copenhagen, it was Clinton who rolled out a $100 billion per year Green Climate Fund to help fund emissions reduction efforts and climate adaptation work in developing countries. That fund has not yet been fully capitalized, however, and this is a major sticking point as the international community approaches the next crucial round of U.N. climate talks, set for Paris in early December. Many developing countries say that without a working Green Climate Fund, they cannot take potentially painful emissions cuts at home. In Iowa on Monday, Clinton said the U.S. must lead by example in order to secure climate agreements with other nations. “No country will fall in line just because we tell them to,” she said. “America needs to lead this fight, not go M.I.A.,” Clinton said. Clinton has earned the backing of billionaire Tom Steyer, whose group, NextGen Climate Action and a related political action committee, supports candidates who seek to address global warming. Steyer sent an email to reporters lauding Clinton's proposal on Sunday night. "Today, Hillary Clinton emerged as a strong leader in solving the climate crisis and ensuring our country’s economic security," Steyer said in a statement. "Clinton laid out an ambitious framework to put our nation on a path to a clean energy economy that will create millions of jobs — and in the coming months we look forward to hearing more details about her proposals to tackle climate change." Clinton dodges Keystone question On the question of whether or not to approve the Keystone-XL Pipeline from Canada to the U.S., however, Clinton refused to take a position when asked about her stance by a reporter on Monday. The pipeline would move oil from Canada's oil sands region in Alberta south to refineries along the Gulf Coast, where it would be prepared for export. In dodging the Keystone issue, Clinton cited her involvement in the review process for the pipeline during her time at the State Department. Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama have yet to make a decision on whether to approve the pipeline, which falls under the State Department's purview since it would cross an international border. Clinton said she is confident that “The pipeline’s impacts on global greenhouse gas emissions will be a major factor in that decision." Bill McKibben, the founder of the environmental group 350.org, lauded Clinton's policy proposals on Monday, but criticized her position on Keystone. "Now, we need Clinton to show she understands the other half of the climate change equation — and prove she has the courage to stand up against fossil fuel projects like offshore and Arctic drilling, coal leasing in the Powder River basin, and the Keystone XL pipeline," he said in a statement. "... At the end of the day, growth in renewables doesn’t mean enough if we’re simultaneously kicking the decarbonization can down the road with more pipelines and more extraction on public lands,” McKibben said. Hillary Clinton's Climate Change Video Finally Calls Out Republicans' Bogus "I'm Not A Scientist" Platform <http://www.bustle.com/articles/99986-hillary-clintons-climate-change-video-finally-calls-out-republicans-bogus-im-not-a-scientist-platform> // Bustle // Lauren Barbato – July 27, 2015 For the next leg of her campaign, Hillary Clinton is taking on climate change. In a video released by her campaign Sunday night, Clinton unveiled her official climate-change position, as well as the policies she intends to put in place if she reaches the White House. So, what is her position on this major 2016 talking point? Well, let’s just say Clinton’s stance on the validity of science places her more in line with Pope Francis than Jeb Bush. “I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain,” Clinton says in the opening lines of the video. “I know what’s happening in the world is going to have a big effect on my daughter, and especially on my granddaughter.” Clinton goes on to attack her Republican foes, including frontrunners like Bush, Donald Trump, Rick Perry and Sen. Marco Rubio, for rejecting climate-change science — or, just science in general — in 2015. More and more, taking a stance against climate change has become a hallmark of the Republican Party, and Clinton wants to make sure none of us forgets it. “It’s hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change,” Clinton says. “Who would rather remind us they’re not scientists than listen to those who are.” “You don’t have to be a scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all,” Clinton continues.”You just have to be willing to act.” So, what is HRC going to do about this climate-change threat? First, she praised the renewable energy industry for preventing premature deaths and asthma attacks, while also creating new jobs for Americans. But Clinton also put forth a much stronger call to action in her latest video. “On day one as president, I will set two ambitious national goals that will test our capacities,” Clinton said. And her two goals are (drumroll, please): · ensuring America has more than half a billion solar panels installed across the country by the end of 2020 · set a 10-year goal of generating renewable energy that can power “every single home” in the United States Clinton promised that a “comprehensive agenda” will be released within the next few months, but she did give a few hints while addressing a crowd of supporters in Ames, Iowa, on Sunday. For instance, Clinton said she plans to use tax incentives, including a possible renewable of the wind energy tax credit, to reach her 10-year goal of powering homes in America with renewable energy. The former secretary of state also talked about transitioning America from fossil fuels to new sources of energy. “We need to get the incentives fixed in our tax system which as you know are too heavily weighted toward fossil fuels,” Clinton said Sunday in Iowa. So far, Clinton’s video is a welcome change from much of the climate-change talk we’ve been hearing this campaign season. While we await Clinton’s full agenda, we can at least take comfort in knowing that Clinton has more in common with Pope Francis than Rick “The Pope Is Not A Scientist” Santorum et al. How Hillary Clinton's Climate Change Plan Stands Up To Martin O'Malley's, aka The Only Two Global Warming Strategies In The Entire Race <http://www.bustle.com/articles/100013-how-hillary-clintons-climate-change-plan-stands-up-to-martin-omalleys-aka-the-only-two-global> // Bustle // Kendyl Kearly – July 27, 2015 It’s still 2015, but candidates in the 2016 presidential race have already begun to claim the most important issues to their platforms, and hash out large-scale plans for dealing with them. Environmentalism is a huge cause for the major candidates on the left, and two of them have been the first to share large environmental protection agendas. On Sunday evening, Hillary Clinton joined Martin O’Malley in providing climate change plans. O’Malley shared his ideas for a green presidency back in June, winning Democratic praise for being the first major candidate to do so. The proposal is aggressive and came right after Pope Francis’ encyclical that expressed the need to protect the Earth from climate change. Although Clinton and O’Malley have the same goal in mind, their plans to accomplish it have some notable differences. One of Clinton’s largest goals centers around solar energy. She says she will expand the amount of installed solar capacity by 700 percent by 2020. According to her website, she wants more than half a billion panels installed by the end of her first term. O’Malley also wants clean energy to be a part of his presidency. He advocates for the extension of tax credits that fuel the wind and solar panel industries. He would launch an organization that centers around financing community wind and solar programs. He supports loans and grants for farmers and small business owners that encourage them to adopt clean energy. Unlike Clinton, O’Malley mentioned the use of biofuels. As president, he would use tax credits and EPA volume targets to build a thriving biofuel industry. Although Clinton has not yet said whether biofuels would be a part of her plan, she supported their use during her 2008 campaign. O’Malley believes that the way to make his plan sustainable is through training workers to embrace environmentally friendly practices. He wants to create an organization that focuses on clean energy jobs. This organization would theoretically partner with communities, build clean energy infrastructures, make buildings more energy efficient, and expand fields and forests. Clinton mentioned a “Clean Energy Challenge” that would partner with states, cities, and rural communities, but it’s unclear now what exactly such a challenge would do for those communities. Whereas Clinton keeps her agenda related to clean energy, O’Malley addresses job creation and economic issues with his ideas. He has also expressed his disapproval of off-shore drilling and tar sand oil energy, while Clinton has been less clear on such controversial environmental issues. Their timelines differ as well. O’Malley believes that in 35 years, the country could be 100 percent powered by clean energy. Clinton says that by 2020, renewable energy could be a third of all energy generated. Her other goal is for every American home to be powered by clean energy within 10 years of taking office. At this point, O’Malley’s plan is a lot more specific than Clinton’s when it comes to implementation and funding. However, Clinton says she will give more details in the coming months. Though she’s given more concrete ideas than most other Democratic candidates, she might face pressure to add more specifics if she wants to compare favorably to O’Malley. Hillary Clinton’s Plan to Combat Climate Change With Half-A-Billion Solar Panels <http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/07/26/3684585/hillary-clintons-climate-plan-released/> //ThinkProgress // Emily Atkin – July 26, 2015 Hillary Clinton is going all in on renewable energy. On Sunday evening, the Democratic presidential candidate released a fact sheet detailing her plan to fight climate change, and it focuses heavily on promoting clean energy generation across the country. Among other things, the plan includes a promise to install half a billion solar panels by 2021, or the end of Clinton’s first term. That would represent a 700 percent increase from current installations, she said. Clinton also promised that, if elected, enough renewable energy would be produced to power every home in the country within 10 years. “We can make a transition over time from a fossil fuel economy, predominantly, to a clean renewable energy economy, predominantly,” Clinton said in Iowa on Sunday, Yahoo reported. The aggressive transition to renewables proposed by Clinton would be achieved partially through extending and strengthening tax breaks those industries, Clinton said. Last week, the Senate proposed renewing two tax incentives for the wind industry, which are currently expired. Clinton is expected to explain more details of the plan during a Monday event in Des Moines, according to Yahoo’s report. Though Clinton has been outspoken about the need to address climate change, many environmentalists have expressed doubt that her policies would be as strong as they may like. They often point to her historic “inclination” to approve the controversial Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, and her support for domestic fossil fuel production, specifically natural gas. But tackling climate change has been central to Clinton’s campaign so far. In her campaign kick-off speech, she promised to make America “the clean energy superpower of the 21st century” and condemned Republican politicians for willfully ignoring the science behind human-caused warming. Her campaign chairman John Podesta was the architect of President Obama’s plan to tackle carbon emissions through regulations, and Clinton has promised to keep those regulations in place “at all costs.” As ThinkProgress pointed out in April, Clinton’s is the first major presidential campaign ever to make combating climate change a central issue. That certainly does not mean that Clinton’s is the only presidential campaign that’s put a hard focus on tackling global warming. Indeed, Democratic contender Martin O’Malley arguably has an even more aggressive climate agenda. His plan is to make the country powered completely by renewable energy by 2050 — meaning no fossil fuel use at all. He has condemned President Obama for approving offshore drilling, supporting domestic oil production, and shying away from bold stances on high-carbon tar sands oil from Canada, which would be transported by the Keystone XL pipeline if it were approved. “We cannot meet the climate challenge with an all-of-the-above energy strategy, or by drilling off our coasts, or by building pipelines that bring oil from tar sands in Canada,” O’Malley wrote in an op-ed published last month. Clinton’s other Democratic rival, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) hasn’t released an official climate plan yet. But in an interview with the Washington Post in May, he said he would go further than President Obama has in tackling the problem. Sanders’ plan, he said, “would look like a tax on carbon; a massive investment in solar, wind, geothermal; it would be making sure that every home and building in this country is properly winterized; it would be putting substantial money into rail, both passenger and cargo, so we can move towards breaking our dependency on automobiles. And it would be leading other countries around the world.” Hillary Clinton proposes installing half a billion solar panels across America by 2020 <http://fusion.net/story/173140/hillary-clinton-proposes-installing-half-a-billion-solar-panels-across-america-by-2020/> // Fusion // Rob Wile – July 26, 2015 Hillary Clinton released Sunday the outlines of how she would tackle climate change if elected president, proposing two ambitious goals. First, she would install half a billion solar panels across America by the end of her first term. It would represent an approximately 546%-increase from current production levels. The average solar panel produces 200 watts, and current U.S. solar photovoltaic output was 18.3 gigawatts as of January 2015 according to GTM Research. This would be part of a larger plan to allow every home in the U.S. to be powered by renewable energy within a decade of her taking office. Currently the residential sector consumes 40% of total electricity output in the U.S, and electricity accounts for 40% of all U.S. energy consumption. She’s calling it the “Clean Energy Challenge,” and published this chart to show how much renewable energy would be generated compared with proposals set forth in President Obama’s Clean Power Plan: “Through these goals,” the campaign says on its website, “we will increase the amount of installed solar capacity by 700% by 2020, expand renewable energy to at least a third of all electricity generation, prevent thousands of premature deaths and tens of thousands of asthma attacks each year, and put our country on a path to achieve deep emission reductions by 2050.” However, she does not propose ending fossil fuel consumption. Instead, she says she wants to, “reduce the amount of oil consumed in the United States and around the world,” and to make sure it is being produced in a “safe and responsible.” No further details were provided on these points. Many GOPers including Marco Rubio have responded to questions about how they’d address climate change with variations on “I’m not a scientist” (that group also includes Jeb Bush, though he also acknowledged that climate change was occurring but that a balance had to be struck between addressing it without incurring major economic costs). At an Iowa campaign event Sunday, the Wall Street Journal‘s Colleen McCain Nelson reported, Hillary mocked the “scientist” remarks. “I’m not a scientist either—I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain…I know that if we start addressing it, we’re going to actually be creating jobs and new businesses.” Last week, renowned climate scientist James Hansen issued one of the most dire climate warnings in years, finding that glaciers at both poles are melting 10-times faster than previously believed, the result of a feedback loop of cold water from already-melting glaciers forcing warmer saltwater underneath remaining glaciers. As a result, the seas are going to rise way faster, and sooner, than anyone is prepared for. “We conclude that continued high emissions will make multi-meter sea level rise practically unavoidable and likely to occur this century,” he wrote. “Social disruption and economic consequences of such large sea level rise could be devastating. It is not difficult to imagine that conflicts arising from forced migrations and economic collapse might make the planet ungovernable, threatening the fabric of civilization.” We are now just four months away from the Paris Climate Conference, at which countries are supposed to come up with a sweeping agreement to address climate change. But as Slate climate correspondent Eric Holthaus reports, the policies being floated in advance of the summit would actually lead to 3.1 degrees Celsius-temperature-rise this century, according to Climate Action Tracker, a group of independent climate research organizations, with both the U.S.’s and China’s CO2 reduction plans rated as inadequate. In New Climate Change Plan, Hillary Attacks Republicans For Refusing To Accept ‘Settled Science’ <http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/27/in-new-climate-change-plan-hillary-attacks-republicans-for-refusing-to-accept-settled-science-video/> // Daily Caller // Chuck Ross – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton attacked the Republican presidential field on Sunday for refusing “to accept the settled science of climate change” in a new campaign video that she released along with an outline for “two bold national goals” to increase the use of renewable energy in the U.S. Clinton’s plan calls for a 700 percent increase in the number of solar panels in the U.S. by the year 2020. That would create an output of 140 gigabytes — the equivalent of having solar panel systems installed on the rooftops of 25 million U.S. homes. Along with solar energy, Clinton says she plans to increase the use of hydro, wind, and geothermal all with a goal of creating enough renewable energy to power every U.S. home within ten years. In a 3-minute video, Clinton criticized Republican candidates for their stances on climate change. “I’m a skeptic. Not a scientist,” reads a quote from Jeb Bush. “I’m not a scientist,” reads another from Marco Rubio. “I may not be a scientist, but I’m a grandmother with two eyes and a brain,” Clinton said in an email announcing the video, repeating a line she’s used frequently on the campaign trail this week. According to the outline of Clinton’s plan, she will propose a “climate action competition” which will provide competitive grants and provide incentives to “empower states to exceed federal carbon pollution standards.” She also plans to set up what she’s calling a Solar X-Prize. That will provide awards to communities that find ways to “cut the red tape that slows rooftop installation times and increases costs for businesses and consumers.” In addition to the competitions, Clinton said she will work to extend clean energy tax incentives and to expand the use of renewable energy on federal lands and property. She also called for reducing “the amount of oil consumed in the United States and around the world.” Clinton also stated that she would “protect the health and retirement security” of coalfield workers. The proposed shift toward renewable and clean energy is expected to displace many of those workers. The plan will “prevent thousands of premature deaths and tens of thousands of asthma attacks each year” while helping the U.S. “meet our national and international climate targets,” Clinton claimed. Glaringly absent from Clinton’s plan is any mention of Keystone XL, the Canadian oil pipeline being blocked by the Obama administration. Clinton has declined to weigh in on whether she thinks that the pipeline should be approved, saying that she is waiting for the State Department to decide whether it will approve. The State Department’s stonewalling has not stopped Clinton’s Democratic competitors from weighing in on the issue, however. Both Vermont U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley have said that they oppose the pipeline. Clinton Announces Energy Plan, Wants to Install A Half-Billion Solar Panels By End Of First Term <http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-announces-energy-plan-wants-install-half-billion-solar-panels-end-first-term-2025133> // IB Times // Sarah Berger – July 27, 2015 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said Sunday she doesn't want future generations looking back and us and wondering how we could "possibly be so irresponsible" when it comes to climate change. Clinton, in announcing her climate and energy agenda, made her first goal having more than a half-billion solar panels installed across the country by the end of her first term. Her second goal is to generate enough renewable energy to power every home in America within 10 years of taking office. “Future generations will look back and wonder what were we thinking. How could we possibly be so irresponsible?” Clinton said in the opening seconds of a video posted to her website. “I’m just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain, and I know what’s happening in the world is going to have a big effect on my daughter, and especially on my granddaughter.” In the video, Clinton said the renewable energy industry prevents as many as 70,000 asthma attacks and 3,000 premature deaths each year. Last year, the industry created 50,000 jobs and drove more than $35 billion in investments, according to the video. “It’s hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change, who’d rather remind us they're not scientists than listen to those who are,” Clinton said in the video. “You don’t have to be a scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all. You just have to be willing to act.” Clinton reinforced her energy plan at a campaign stop in Ames, Iowa, calling for an extension of federal clean energy tax incentives and to make them more cost effective, Reuters reported. She also has plans to fight back against efforts that attempt to push back President Barack Obama’s executive actions to curb carbon emissions from power plants. Clinton will be talking about her proposals Monday at an energy-efficient transit station Iowa. Clinton: We can protect planet and add jobs <http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/07/26/hillary-clinton-touts-new-energy-ideas-ames/30713421/> // Des Moines Register // Tony Leys – July 27, 2015 America can combat climate change while expanding its economy, Hillary Clinton told Iowans Sunday. "I know if we start addressing it, we will actually be creating jobs and new businesses," the Democratic frontrunner for president told about 450 voters gathered at Iowa State University. Too many people believe steps to protect the planet from global warming would cripple the economy, she said. In fact, she said, clean-energy industries have some of the strongest potential to add jobs. She cited a report that the solar-energy industry now has nearly twice as many workers as the coal industry. The report was based on an industry survey that said 174,000 Americans worked in the solar-energy businesses in 2013, compared with 93,000 in coal. Later Sunday, Clinton released a video on her website in which she pledged to have 500 million solar panels installed within four years and to set a 10-year goal of having enough renewable energy to power every American home. "This is not complicated, folks," she told her Ames audience, adding a critique of Republicans that has become a stock laugh generator in her campaign appearances: "Those people on the other side, they will answer any question about climate change by saying, 'I'm not a scientist.' Well, I'm not a scientist either. I'm just a grandmother with two eyes and a brain." She lauded Iowa for obtaining 30 percent of its electricity from wind energy, second only to Texas. That energy comes from the huge turbines that dot the landscape, including many built in Iowa, she noted, to cheers and applause. She also noted that Iowa is growing crops that can be used for fuel, and it has started getting involved in solar businesses. "The people who argue against this are just not paying attention," she said. She said the U.S. should use its tax code and other methods to encourage the new industries. At the same time, she said, the country should not turn its back on the people who made their living in older energy industries, especially coal. "I am grateful, as we all should be, to those men who mined the coal, that created the industrial revolution that turned on the lights that fueled our factories — who lost their lives, who were grievously injured, who developed black lung disease," she said. "They helped build our economy, so it is important that we help them transition to a new economy. I don't want to walk away from anybody that contributed to America." Later Sunday, at a smaller event at a private home near Carroll, Clinton urged supporters to talk about the possibility of new energy jobs with the same enthusiasm as those looking to stick to sources such as coal. "People who want to protect the jobs of the past have very loud voices," she said. "We need to elevate our decibel level a little bit, to talk about the jobs in solar, in wind, in advanced biofuels and in energy efficiency." Global warming tends to be a much bigger concern among Democrats than among Republicans. Other Democratic presidential contenders also are offering plans. For example, former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley has called for America to be completely powered by renewable energy by 2050. Clinton's stances drew strong applause in her Sunday appearances. In Ames, Iowa State University graduate student Mathew Bradley, 21, was among several people who wore orange T-shirts touting their membership in the NextGen Climate group. Bradley, who is studying electrical engineering, hopes to gain a job in a new-energy industry. He was mildly surprised to hear Clinton's claim that nearly twice as many Americans work in the solar industry as work in the coal industry. But he said it's possible, given how mechanized the coal industry has become and how fast the solar industry is growing. "It's such an up-and-coming industry. It makes sense" there would be so many jobs in making and installing solar equipment, he said. He said he was undecided on a presidential candidate but was heartened to hear Clinton's words about climate change. "It's nice to hear politicians are interested in what I'm passionate about." Hillary Clinton touts solar energy plan to court environmentalists in presidential run <http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/clinton-touts-solar-energy-plan-court-enviros-article-1.2305219> // NY Daily News // Cameron Joseph – July 27, 2015 Hillary Clinton unveiled some big goals to slow climate change while seeking to “make America the world's clean energy super-power” on Monday, looking to lock down environmentalists' support. But she continued to dodge on some hot-button issues. “The reality of climate change is unforgiving, no matter what the deniers say,” she said Monday in Des Moines, Iowa, after touring an environmentally friendly train station. Clinton set goals for a half-billion solar panels to be installed by the end of her first term, 2020, and a 10-year goal of generating enough renewable energy “to power every single home in America.” That would mark a sevenfold increase of solar energy production in five years. “America needs to lead this fight, not go MIA,” she said. The speech followed a video released Sunday night in which the Democratic front-runner outlined the plans. "Future generations will look back and wonder, what were we thinking? How could we possibly be so irresponsible?" she says as the video begins, before quotes of GOP presidential candidates questioning the science of climate change appear onscreen. "You don't have to be a scientist to take on this urgent challenge that threatens us all; you just have to be willing to act," she says. The plan, according to Clinton's campaign, would leave the U.S. generating at least one-third of all electricity from renewable resources by 2027. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks to supporters July 25 in Iowa, where she's expected to expand on her green energy plan Tuesday. But Clinton didn’t mention a number of issues key to environmental activists. She didn’t state her positions on the Keystone XL oil pipeline, implementing a carbon tax, fracking and drilling in the Arctic Ocean. Both of her main primary opponents, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, have already unveiled ambitious green energy plans, and both oppose Keystone. Clinton once again refused to weigh in on Keystone in Des Moines, arguing that because she was secretary of state when the government began the cost-benefit analysis of the plan she shouldn’t publicly comment on it until the Obama administration releases its findings. “I know that there is a very careful evaluation pending,” she said before noting she was “confident” the study into the proposed trans-national oil pipeline would take into account its environmental impacts. “I will refrain from commenting because I had a leading role in getting that process started and I think we have to let it run its course,” she said. She also sidestepped a question about a carbon tax. Clinton's plan quickly drew praise from some, but not all, major green groups. Billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer has called for half of all energy production to come from renewables by 2030 — a goal Clinton's campaign says her plan would achieve, counting nuclear energy. "Today, Hillary Clinton emerged as a strong leader in solving the climate crisis," Steyer, who already has held a fund-raiser for Clinton, said in a statement. "We look forward to hearing more details about her proposals to tackle climate change." Bill McKibben of the environmental group 350.org wasn’t as sold, saying she was “half way there” and praising her commitment to renewable energy. “Now, we need Clinton to show she understands the other half of the climate change equation — and prove she has the courage to stand up against fossil fuel projects,” he said. Clinton was light on specifics - she promised to flesh out her green energy plan "over the coming months." -- *Cameron Langford* Communications Intern | Hillary for America -- Milia Fisher Special Assistant to the Chair Hillary for America [email protected] o: 646.854.1198 c: 858.395.1741