📄 Extracted Text (183 words)
From: Joscha Bach -
To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Subject: Deception
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 7:24:55 PM
smime.p7s
Here is an observation/idea that you perhaps already know, but it just came to me.
[Ekman's studies of facial expressions were triggered by him hearing about exceptional talents in lie
detection. He discovered that these people pick up subtle and rapid cues ("micro expression"), and are
highly trained in dealing with liars (often because they are judges or secret service agents etc). If
someone reached an accuracy of 80% (as opposed to 50% in the general population), Ekman called
them "truth wizards". He became an expert himself.]
I just learned that some people have built a visual lie detector that works with posture/movement and
visual expressions, using machine learning. It has an accuracy of about 80%.
It seems to me that instead of doing research into how to get to 82%, we should study the 20% of the
population that are near unstoppable liars. What is different about them? Does it make them more
successful? And why is the trait not more prevalent?
EFTA_R1_00040975
EFTA01746922
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
18c9de1851d5330aef25d4712b0b7488fc62ed894c85b40192d134506b3d7c75
Bates Number
EFTA01746922
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0