EFTA00102386.pdf

From: ' (USANYS)" <MINIMIE> To: rat " (USANYS)" 1" - Cc: )" Subject: RE: Epstein catch up Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:53:18 +0000 No worries -- actually, just go ahead withEat 12:30, and I will catch up with him after. Ori inal Messa e From: 't: IMIN> Sent: Monda November 18, 2019 10:32 AM To: (USANYS USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein catch up Sony, I figured those slots were when you were both available -- I'll likely still be in a meeting at 12:30; could we do later, 1:00 or 1:30? We all have various stuff scheduled for today so just trying to slot in. Or otherwise I can just try to cut my other meeting short, but it's been rescheduled once already so if it's possible to do 1 or 1:30 that would be great. Ori inal Messa e From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday,November 18, 2019 10:30 To: (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein catch up I can't do 12:30. Any chance you can do 12? Ori inal Messa e From: 'c IMIIM> Sent: Monda , November 18, 2019 10:29 AM To: USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein catch up Yes, we can do 12:30 -- we'll plan to meet then. Ori inal Messa e From: (USANYS) Sent: Monda November 18, 2019 10:15 To: Cc: USANYS tir) Subject: Re: Epstein catch up EFTA00102386 My day just opened up a bit. Any chance you guys are free today from 11-2 or at 3? Sent from my iPhone > On Nov is, 2019, at 9:46 AM, < IIMIIM> wrote: > I could join by phone at 10am if that works for everyone, thanks. > Ori inal Messa e > From: (USANYS) cMIMMIN> > Sent: Sunday,November 17, 2019 3:21 PM > To: (USANYS) > Cc: <Ma: aNIMME> > Subject: RE: Epstein catch up > Let's do Wednesday if there is a time could make work by phone. > Ori inal Messa e > From: > Sent: Sunda November 17, 2019 1:00 PM > To: (USANYS > Cc: (USANYS) > Subject: Re: Epstein catch up > Sure, happy to catch up — we tried to stop by a couple times on Friday but missed you, so can set a time for this week. Unfortunately we have conflicts tomorrow from 5:30 on — we could potentially do Wednesday but will be in White Plains so would have to call in, or if there are available times on Tuesday we could try for that. > Just as backdrop, the meeting in California did not add any significant information except that we almost certainly couldn't bring an enticement charge (based on timing / location facts), and she's still not sure whether she wants to pursue a criminal case so we'll circle back with her attorneys later this month. She also didn't want to talk about specific conduct at this meeting so we don't have any additional info there. Meanwhile we're continuing to work on the pile of memos, and I don't think there's any additional update other than that is coming in for a limited proffer (just talking about her background, to start) a week from Tuesday. >> On Nov 16, 2019, at 21:18, (USANYS) aMl.' wrote: >> Can we find a time in the near future to catch up on a few things, including hearing more about your interview last week? Unfortunately both and I have to be out portions of Monday/Tuesday. Would Monday at 530 work for you guys? If not, can we aim for Wednesday morning. Thanks >> Sent from my iPhone EFTA00102387