podesta_email_19573.txt

podesta-emails 5,450 words email

P17 P22 D6 V11 V9

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Wednesday January 14, 2015 Afternoon Roundup:* *Tweets:* *Correct The Record *@CorrectRecord: .@HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton> launched energy programs that created economic opportunity #HRC365 <https://twitter.com/hashtag/HRC365?src=hash> http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-fueling-americas-energy-future/ … <http://t.co/XqzmbDhxgq> [1/13/15, 6:02 p.m. EST <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/555137779789615106>] *Headlines:* *The Hill: “Paul: Clinton did a 'terrible job' at State” <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/229352-paul-clinton-did-a-terrible-job-at-state>* “‘Hillary Clinton took responsibility, took action, and was fully transparent in her efforts to prevent a tragedy such as Benghazi from ever happening again,’ Adrienne Watson, a spokeswoman for the pro-Clinton super-PAC Correct the Record, wrote in an email to The Hill.” *Associated Press: “Diminished in Congress and Many States, Dems Weigh Future” <http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEMOCRATS_IN_RETREAT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>* “Presidential politics remain the Democrats' brightest spot. They've won the popular vote in five of the last six presidential races, and they have high hopes for a 2016 field that could feature Hillary Rodham Clinton.” *The Hill: “Benghazi panel meets with Obama officials” <http://thehill.com/policy/defense/229487-benghazi-panel-meets-obama-officials>* “The House Select Committee investigating the deadly terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya this week held a pair of classified briefings with Obama administration officials.” *BuzzFeed: “The GOP’s Univision Problem” <http://www.buzzfeed.com/adriancarrasquillo/the-gops-univision-problem#.id3vvMR0q>* [Subtitle:] “The network’s ties to Hillary Clinton, treatment of Marco Rubio, and singular focus on immigration give Republicans fits. But for one big reason: Republicans need Univision.” *Washington Post blog: The Fix: “No, Hillary Clinton ≠ Mitt Romney when it comes to 2016” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/01/14/no-hillary-clinton-%E2%89%A0-mitt-romney-when-it-comes-to-2016/>* “The logic of Clinton's 2016 candidacy seems to be there. For Romney, not so much.” *Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Hopes for a Woman President Split Along Party, Gender Lines” <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/01/14/hopes-for-a-woman-president-split-along-party-gender-lines/>* "Among Democratic women, 69% say they hope to see a female president." *Mediaite: “Chuck Todd: Number of GOP Candidates Shows Hillary’s Not Intimidating” <http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chuck-todd-number-of-gop-candidates-shows-hillarys-not-intimidating/>* “Meet the Press host Chuck Todd told Morning Joe Wednesday the number of GOP figures now seriously considering a 2016 run showed Hillary Clinton was not the formidable candidate the press had made her out to be.” *Weekly Standard: Jindal to Bash Hillary's 'Mindless Naiveté' in London Speech <http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/jindal-bash-hillarys-mindless-naivet-london-speech_823731.html?page=1>* “Jindal will use the speech to bash Hillary Clinton, the likely 2016 Democratic presidential candidate, and to go after radical Islam in wake of last week's Paris terrorist attacks.” *Articles:* *The Hill: “Paul: Clinton did a 'terrible job' at State” <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/229352-paul-clinton-did-a-terrible-job-at-state>* By Jesse Byrnes January 13, 2015 7:45 p.m. EDT Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) took a shot at likely Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Tuesday, saying she did "a terrible job" as secretary of State and calling her handling of the Benghazi attacks "inexcusable." "I put a lot of blame at the feet of Hillary Clinton for not defending the consulate in Benghazi," Paul said after comments at the conservative Heritage Foundation, referring to the 2012 attacks that left four Americans dead, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya. "I think she did a terrible job," Paul added, saying it was "inexcusable" to not provide help when assistance was requested. “Hillary Clinton took responsibility, took action, and was fully transparent in her efforts to prevent a tragedy such as Benghazi from ever happening again," Adrienne Watson, a spokeswoman for the pro-Clinton super-PAC Correct the Record, wrote in an email to The Hill. The group shot back at Paul, accusing the lawmaker of holding "extremist views" on foreign policy that "would be a big and dangerous gamble." Paul, also a likely 2016 presidential candidate, has dinged Clinton on Benghazi in the past and highlighted her support of unsuccessful midterm candidates. His latest shot follows developments among high-profile potential Republican presidential candidates. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said he is seriously considering a third White House bid, telling one Republican in a Washington Post story published Monday night that he "almost certainly will" jump into the 2016 race. Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is also ramping up for a presidential run, and other Republicans weighing bids include New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, outgoing Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee. Paul's comments on Clinton came immediately after responding to a question on radical Islamic terrorism, saying, “We have to defend ourselves.” "Printing cartoons shouldn't engender people murdering you," he added, referring to last week's deadly attack on Charlie Hebdo, a satirical newspaper in Paris known for its caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad. The two-day Heritage Foundation event will include speeches by conservative lawmakers including Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas), Sen. Mike Lee (Utah) and Rep. Jeff Duncan (S.C.). Paul is set to visit the early voting state of New Hampshire on Wednesday, where he will meet political leaders, business heads and activists. *Associated Press: “Diminished in Congress and Many States, Dems Weigh Future” <http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEMOCRATS_IN_RETREAT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>* By Charles Babington and Andrew Taylor January 14, 2015, 10:25 a.m. EST Congressional Democrats are in retreat in more ways than one this week. As Democratic senators gather in Baltimore to talk strategy and lick election wounds, their party faces diminished powers in Congress, GOP dominance in many states and a shrinking pool of potential candidates for future elections. In the November elections, Democrats lost their eight-year Senate majority, and saw their House numbers fall to the lowest level in seven decades. In the states, Republicans will hold 31 governorships, and more state legislative seats than they've had since 1928. It especially vexes Democrats to see Republicans dominate the U.S. House delegations and the state governments in several states that President Barack Obama won, including huge legislative majorities in Florida, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin. "I think there's a lot of frustration," said Rep. John Yarmuth, a Kentucky Democrat who said the party has "failed to do something that I think represents an opportunity for us. We really haven't talked to the American people about what government does for them." The big gap between Democratic success at the presidential level and elsewhere "is a real dilemma, I think, for democracy really, not just the Democratic Party," said Rep. David Price of North Carolina, a 14-term congressman and former Duke University political scientist. He said Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Virginia display the "most egregious" examples of gerrymandered districts for congressional and state legislative races. This long-practiced brand of partisan map-making, Price said, helps Republicans control the legislatures of states that vote Democratic for president. But in a sign of local Democrats' struggles to change voters' minds, Price said the best prospect for reversing the trend - in the South, at least - is in lawsuits that allege racial bias in the way Republicans drew district boundaries. Obama's veto power, plus Democratic senators' ability to block some bills with filibusters, will limit GOP success in Congress over the next two years. Meanwhile, congressional Democrats are limiting their ambitions and hoping for at least a partial thaw in partisan gridlock. Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia said he hopes both parties will move beyond campaign rhetoric and "get to a point where we can actually move the ball on some issues." He pointed to a series of events this year "that could actually see breakthroughs or another breakdown, from the debt ceiling to Social Security disability to infrastructure." Congressional Republicans will naturally take credit for any legislative achievements, Warner said. However, he said, "a functioning government, when you've got a Democratic president, actually still helps Democrats." Many Democrats say the party needs to sharpen its messaging. They note that voters in several states last fall approved referendums to raise the minimum wage, and simultaneously ousted Democratic senators who backed the proposals. "We believe we're on the right side of the issues, and all we can do is keeping making the case," Yarmuth said. "Hopefully we'll get better at that." House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California on Tuesday announced a new messaging team led by Steve Israel, D-N.Y. "We need a message," Israel said. "An effective message doesn't tell voters what to think. It builds on what they feel." Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia said Democrats must do a better job of highlighting economic improvements and a dramatic increase in energy production under Obama's watch. They should talk about initiatives, such as a higher minimum wage, and better training for workers, not as government programs but as common-sense ways to help workers, he said. "We're not battling to increase government," Kaine said, "we're battling to help everyday people." Some Democrats note that their congressional leaders have been around for decades, and don't personify fresh ideas. The House's top three Democratic leaders -Pelosi, Steny Hoyer and James Clyburn - are in their mid-70s. So is Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. More troubling to Democrats is Republican dominance of local politics in states that are competitive in presidential and Senate races. Obama carried Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia twice, and North Carolina once. Yet Republicans hold big majorities in these states' legislative chambers, except Virginia, where their Senate majority is narrow. Of the 99 U.S House seats in these six states, Democrats hold 30. These discrepancies can't be blamed entirely on gerrymandering, said Steve Schale, a top Florida Democratic strategist. Too often, he said, "we've done a lousy job of recruiting candidates" at all levels. Strong candidate recruitment - starting with mayors and state legislatures - builds a farm team of potential candidates for governor and Congress, Schale said. "We've gotten away from a lot of that basic blocking and tackling," he said. He said the November election of Democratic Rep. Gwen Graham - who ousted a Republican House member from the Tallahassee area - proves that a well-funded and articulate Democrat can prosper even in a strong GOP year. Presidential politics remain the Democrats' brightest spot. They've won the popular vote in five of the last six presidential races, and they have high hopes for a 2016 field that could feature Hillary Rodham Clinton. Still, some Democrats worry that Clinton might come across as a stale, too-familiar politician. If Republicans nominate Jeb Bush or Mitt Romney, however, that issue might be negated. Price predicts Republican lawmakers will turn off moderate voters by placating conservative hard-liners. "We see the most extreme elements of the conference getting their wish list," Price said. That gives Democrats a natural opening with "more reasonable and more moderate voters," he said. "The tea party agenda is energizing," he said, "believe me." *The Hill: “Benghazi panel meets with Obama officials” <http://thehill.com/policy/defense/229487-benghazi-panel-meets-obama-officials>* By Martin Matishak January 14, 2015, 1:00 p.m. EST The House Select Committee investigating the deadly terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya this week held a pair of classified briefings with Obama administration officials. “The Select Committee met in closed session to discuss the facts surrounding the attacks on our mission facility and annex in Benghazi," panel chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said in a statement. “The Department of State provided new information to the committee and answered questions raised by committee members.” The committee also held a closed-door meeting with Justice Department officials to discuss documents and potential witnesses related to the committee’s investigation. “The committee is continuing its probe into all aspects of Benghazi and is currently focused on ensuring access to all first-hand accounts from those on the ground that night,” Gowdy said. “This process will be ongoing and in some respects must remain classified.” Gowdy said that while the bulk of the committee’s work would have to be done behind closed doors, he intends to hold additional hearings that are open the public. Democrats have labeled the GOP’s Benghazi panel a “political stunt” aimed at generating negative publicity for Hillary Clinton, the presumed front-runner for the Democratic nomination for the presidency in 2016 who was secretary of State at the time of the deadly assault in Libya. Republicans have repeatedly attacked Clinton’s handling of the episode, with several suggesting it should disqualify her for the presidency. Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor, steered clear of the Clinton controversy during his first two public hearings last year. However, he has split with Rep. Elijah Cummings (Md.), the panel’s top Democrat, over whether Clinton should appear before lawmakers. Clinton is “a witness that we would like to talk to. I cannot tell you when,” Gowdy told reporters after the panel’s second hearing. The investigation is proceeding in the wake of a new report published by the GOP-controlled House Intelligence Committee last year that found no evidence of an intelligence failure ahead of the attack. The Intelligence panel concluded that there was no delay in sending a rescue mission to the consulate when it came under attack, and that there had been no missed opportunity to launch a rescue by armed forces. Several Republicans have been harshly critical of that report, with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) dismissing it as “full of crap. *BuzzFeed: “The GOP’s Univision Problem” <http://www.buzzfeed.com/adriancarrasquillo/the-gops-univision-problem#.id3vvMR0q>* By Adrian Carrasquillo January 14, 2015, 11:53 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] The network’s ties to Hillary Clinton, treatment of Marco Rubio, and singular focus on immigration give Republicans fits. But for one big reason: Republicans need Univision. The Republican presidential primary got going in earnest this month, but one of the Republican Party’s biggest, most complex, most painful challenges still hasn’t been solved: what to do about Univision. The Spanish-language network has vast reach into America’s Latino communities, a relentless focus on the Republican Party’s least favorite issue, and close connections to Hillary Clinton. It’s an immovable feature of the political landscape, and navigating around or through it is emerging as a key test for a party desperate to improve its dismal standing with a vital and growing share of the American electorate — and the subject of growing alarm among Republican leaders, operatives, and activists. “It’s highly questionable whether we’re treated fairly on Univision,” RNC chairman Reince Priebus told BuzzFeed News, adding that the party was going to keep at it. “You can fight all day long with people, not to say that that wouldn’t continue, but at the same time you still have to get your message out.” Democrats see the dynamic just as clearly. “The GOP needs Univision more than Univision needs the GOP,” said Democratic pollster Fernand Amandi. “For a party looking to be competitive nationally again, they can’t risk alienating the premiere outlet that caters to the fastest-growing part of the electorate.” The scale of the Republicans’ problem is hard to question. Univision reaches three times as many 18- to 49-year-old Hispanic adults with its flagship national news broadcast as CBS, NBC, and ABC do with their evening newscasts combined. The network reaches 96% of Hispanic households; 72% of Univision’s prime time audience does not watch any of the top-rated English-language newscasts. “After the Catholic Church, the next thing [American Latinos] trust the most is Univision,” Univision News senior vice president Daniel Coronell told BuzzFeed News. The network has a direct connection to the likely Democratic Party nominee for president. Univision’s part-owner, Haim Saban, is one of Hillary Clinton’s staunchest supporters. Of the former secretary of state, Saban once told an Israeli newspaper, “Seeing her in the White House is a big dream of mine.” There are also formal connections: Univision partnered with the Clinton Foundation for an early education initiative in 2014. Republicans, by and large, declined to criticize Univision on the record, citing its power. But speaking on the condition of anonymity, Republican operatives run down a litany of complaints, always returning to Univision’s emphasis on immigration and the way the network’s highest-profile journalist, Jorge Ramos, acts as an advocate on the issue. “Immigration dictates their coverage,” said a senior GOP source, a complaint made repeatedly to BuzzFeed News by Republicans. “We just took the House in Colorado, we just took the U.S. Senate, but Univision will generalize our platform as us not wanting to fund Obama’s executive order,” the source said of Republican opposition to the president’s immigration actions. The senior GOP source pointed to Colorado’s first-ever Spanish-language debate, which was hosted by Univision in October, between Republican Mike Coffman and Democrat Andrew Romanoff. Immigration was the only issue raised. There have also been high-profile battles on other topics. In 2011, the network planned to report on the decades-old drug bust of Rubio’s brother-in-law, but offered to approach the story differently — if Rubio agreed to an interview with Ramos. The story aired and Rubio went on with Ramos the next year in an interview that became contentious over the issue. It is the focus on immigration, in particular, that grates on Republicans, in part because they say it contrasts so sharply with what Univision executives tell them when they’re asking for ad dollars. In the fall of 2013, less than a year after President Obama carried 71% of the Latino vote, for instance, Republican officials listened at the Capitol Hill Club to a presentation from two people: Keith Norman, a vice president from Univision, and an outside pollster for the network. The message was simple: Immigration, according to the polling, wasn’t the top issue for Latinos. Jobs and the economy, education, and health care all ranked higher. The pitch, the kind party officials had received before and received again in 2014 was clear — spend money with Univision to reach Latino voters in competitive congressional races in places like Florida, Arizona, Colorado, and Texas. The Republican officials grumbled, then decided they had no choice, and bought digital ads on Univision.com and 30-second audio ads on Univision’s music radio app Uforia in Miami, hitting the president on Obamacare. Univision News’s Coronell, a former high-profile journalist in Colombia, defended the network’s coverage as fair, saying Republicans aren’t the only ones complaining. He pointed to Ramos’ sharp coverage of Obama’s immigration record, and their last sitdown interview as just the latest example of the Democratic administration’s ongoing frustration with Univision. “Some of the members of the White House communications team felt that Jorge was not respectful enough to the president and very insistent and picky with his questions,” Coronell said. “Jorge Ramos asked about deportations numbers, he asked why he took so long to make this decision. The role of journalism is to ask, to be the counterweight to the politicians.” Coronell repeated a common refrain: The network has a standing invitation to top Republican officials. He downplayed the issue of Saban, the Clinton donor and Univision owner. “With respect to Mr. Saban, Mr. Saban is not involved with editorial decisions at Univision,” he said. “This is a serious company, he is very respectful to our journalistic independence. He’s not connected with our day to day; we’re not in this to build his happiness.” Univision representatives told BuzzFeed News the network’s partnership with the Clinton Foundation also includes former Republican Sen. Bill Frist and Cindy McCain, the wife of Sen. John McCain, who are part of the Too Small To Fail leadership advisory council. (Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush was approached for an education partnership, too, a Republican source said, but the talks never advanced.) The network also pointed to a Hispanic employment event it did with Gov. Chris Christie in New Jersey, as evidence of broader political cooperation. But when it comes to the main Republican complaint — that the network focuses too narrowly on immigration — Ramos and Coronell argue the issue is tied to the network’s core appeal. “It’s true that immigration is not the most important issue for Latinos,” Ramos said. “However, immigration is the most important symbolic issue for Latinos. Immigration defines who is with us and who is against us. Immigration is something personal.” He said half of all Latinos in the United States over 18 are immigrants and Univision will continue to press on immigration because it is an unresolved issue. He and Coronell said their approach is influenced by Univision’s special relationship with its audience, an audience that can’t find immigration news in English as readily. “In many ways Univision is different from other networks and it has to do with the lack of political representation of Latinos,” Ramos said, noting that Hispanics comprise 17% of the U.S. population but there are only three Latino senators. “It falls on Spanish-language media to defend and represent those who have no representation, especially those who are undocumented.” And Democrats argue Republicans are using complaints to mask their simple aversion to talking about immigration — an issue that divides the GOP — at all. “Democrats make themselves available so they get hit hard, Republicans do not,” said Gabriela Domenzain, an Obama campaign veteran who spent years at Univision. She said there was only one time Republicans would actively seek out the network. “Unless something said in some newscast ticked them off, then they would call us until we booked Spanish-speaking Republicans to do damage control.” Latino Republicans say the network’s influence makes ignoring Univision a nonstarter and some see openings for better coverage. Ken Oliver-Méndez, with MRC Latino, a conservative media watchdog focused on Spanish-language media, said his organization believes Univision should either do a programming alliance with a conservative organization to offset its partnership with Clinton or drop it all together. But he also said Republicans need to a do a better job of engaging with Spanish-language media like Univision and Telemundo. “Conservatives have an obligation to get their message out,” he said. That’s why MRC Latino provided news organizations with a list of Spanish-language conservative sources, whom he called “eloquent, serious policy experts” in August. For his part, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who many expect to run for president, and isn’t one to shy away from speaking frankly, didn’t criticize the network’s ties to Clinton. “That’s not a question I’ve examined,” he told BuzzFeed News. “I’ve been interviewed by Univision many times.” The former RNC official said Republicans should also think about the high-powered local Univision affiliates which can get more viewers than national newscasts with Ramos. “People work really long hours,” the source said. “Somewhere like Las Vegas, the middle-class worker doesn’t get out till late, they might miss Ramos but they get their news from the local affiliate.” The numbers in some cities bear it out. According to statistics provided by the network, Univision broadcast stations in Los Angeles, Houston, Dallas, and Fresno ranked number one ahead of ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC among adults 18 to 49 and adults 18-34 during primetime. In Miami, Univision ranked as the number one broadcast station during primetime among total viewers. The local opportunity also presents yet another problem, though: While national Univision is seen as more balanced in their segments, “when it comes to local coverage, there is more difficulty with local producers,” the senior GOP source said. Others point to progress in the relationship, with Univision working hard to develop relationships in both parties working through internal “red” and “blue” teams, which led to the RNC developing relationships with network general managers, for example. But Ramos told BuzzFeed News that he’s not planning to back off as the 2016 election approaches, and he said the only way the Republicans can fix it is by acting on immigration. “I understand why the Republican party is so concerned,” he said.”Latinos know that Republicans are the ones blocking immigration reform right now and they’re going to have to deal with that in 2016. Unless they resolve the immigration issue, they might lose the Latino vote again and then they will lose the White House again.” *Washington Post blog: The Fix: “No, Hillary Clinton ≠ Mitt Romney when it comes to 2016” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/01/14/no-hillary-clinton-%E2%89%A0-mitt-romney-when-it-comes-to-2016/>* By Chris Cillizza January 14 at 11:54 a.m. EDT After I wrote this piece arguing that it made little sense for Mitt Romney to run for president a third time in 2016, I got lots -- and lots -- of tweets like this one: [Graphic] Clinton has, after all, been around national politics longer than Romney. And, she is just as much a throwback as he would be if he ran again. I get it. I just don't agree with it. (Cue: Well, that's because you are a Democrat and rooting for her to win. Um, no.) Here's why a second Clinton bid in 2016 makes more sense than a third Romney bid would. 1. It would be her second, not third, run for president. The more apt comparison for Clinton 2016 is Romney 2012. In both cases, they were seen as the runner-up to the eventual nominee in their party's most recent competitive primary. And, there's a clear logic in coming in second and then running again to try and come in first. It's the logic that installed Romney as the favorite in 2012, a position he never relinquished. Making a return bid also allows a candidate -- Clinton in this case -- to make the "I did it once and learned what to do and what not to do" argument. Running for a third time in three straight elections, having lost twice before, makes it a lot harder to make that argument. 2. She's spent 6 years doing other things. Clinton went from her 2008 loss to serving for four years as the country's leading diplomat. That allows her to present herself as something different and new-ish to voters. She can draw -- rhetorically and from a policy perspective -- on what she's done since the last time she ran for president; "Representing the U.S. on the world stage, I learned that .......," is a sentence you can see Clinton using -- and using effectively -- as she re-pitches herself to voters. Romney, on the other hand, is just over two years removed from losing in 2012, and hasn't taken a job (or a position on a major issue) that would allow him to make the I'm-something-new-and-different argument easily. He's essentially the same person he was when he lost in 2012; his argument is, in a nutshell: I came close last time and I was right about lots of things. Sure. But, neither of those things re-invent him in any way -- and his loss in 2012 suggests that some level of reinvention would be necessary if he wants to run and win in 2016. 3. She has no primary challenge. Clinton is running (or will be running) in as close to an empty primary field as any non-incumbent president could hope for in 2016. She is the de facto nominee before she has even said the words "I'm running". Romney, on the other hand, would face a crowded and talented field that is, inarguably deeper and better than the one he bested in 2012. If Romney had a path even close to as (seemingly) easy as Clinton's, his third time candidacy would make a whole lot more sense. That word "sense" is the one that I -- and the Republicans I talk to not directly linked to Romney -- keep coming back to when talking about his potential 2016 candidacy. Typically in winning campaigns -- presidential or otherwise -- there's a logic behind the bid that not only makes sense to the candidate and his or inner circle but also to voters. Whether that's a re-run after coming in second (the preferred route to the nomination of most recent Republican nominees) or the need to have a complete break from the "old" ways of doing things in politics (Barack Obama's "hope" and "change" in 2008), there's usually a sound logic to the candidacy. Campaigns without an obvious logic to them -- Ted Kennedy's primary challenge to President Jimmy Carter in 1980 being the shining example -- tend not to work out so well. And, the logic of Clinton's 2016 candidacy seems to be there. For Romney, not so much. *Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Hopes for a Woman President Split Along Party, Gender Lines” <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/01/14/hopes-for-a-woman-president-split-along-party-gender-lines/>* By Eric Morath January 14, 2015, 10:00 a.m. EST With possible presidential runs for Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren on voters’ minds, better than two-thirds of Democratic women say they are hopeful a woman will be elected to the nation’s top office in their lifetime. A poll released Wednesday by Pew Research Center found that 38% of adults hope the U.S. will elect a female president in their lifetime. But the answers varied widely by party and gender. Among Democratic women, 69% say they hope to see a female president. In contrast, just 20% of Republican women held that view. Among men, 46% of Democrats said they hoped to see a woman take the oath of office versus 16% of Republicans. For many Republicans, their view is likely more about the prospect of a Hillary Clinton presidency than about a major milestone for women, Pew said, a perspective that influences the way they respond to the hypothetical question. The poll also asked about gender equality in the workplace. A majority of Republican men, 54%, said the country has already taken the necessary steps to achieve gender equality in the workplace. In contrast, 66% of Republican women said more changes are needed to achieve equality—nearly matching the 71% share all those polled who held that opinion. Pew’s findings come from two separate November surveys of more than 1,000 adults each. Women working full-time earned 82 cents, on average, for every dollar a man earned in 2013, the Labor Department said in December. That finding showed a very slight narrowing from 2012’s figure of 81 cents and little progress since the recession ended in 2009, when women earned 80% of average male wages. *Mediaite: “Chuck Todd: Number of GOP Candidates Shows Hillary’s Not Intimidating” <http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chuck-todd-number-of-gop-candidates-shows-hillarys-not-intimidating/>* By Evan McMurry January 14, 2015, 10:10 a.m. EST Meet the Press host Chuck Todd told Morning Joe Wednesday the number of GOP figures now seriously considering a 2016 run showed Hillary Clinton was not the formidable candidate the press had made her out to be. “A lot of Republicans obviously believe 2016 is going to be the best chance at the presidency in a long time, or they wouldn’t be clamoring to get in,” Todd said. “This means a lot of Republicans look at Hillary Clinton and are not intimidated. I’m sorry, nobody a month ago thought Bush, Romney, and Christie would be in this race.” Cohost Joe Scarborough asked if Clinton’s book tour, marred by low sales and several micro-scandals, had in fact lowered her status as the inevitable candidate. Todd agreed. “If she’d had a different type of book tour,” he asked, “do we think Jeb Bush gets in, do we think Mitt Romney reconsiders?” Rumors that Clinton’s inevitability was a media creation of shows just like this one went unconfirmed at press time. Watch the clip below, via MSNBC: [VIDEO] *Weekly Standard: Jindal to Bash Hillary's 'Mindless Naiveté' in London Speech <http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/jindal-bash-hillarys-mindless-naivet-london-speech_823731.html?page=1>* By Daniel Halper January 14, 2015 9:05 a.m. EDT [Subtitle:] And Declare 'Islam Has a Problem.' Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, a likely 2016 Republican presidential candidate, will give a major foreign policy address next week in London. According to early excerpts of the address, Jindal will use the speech to bash Hillary Clinton, the likely 2016 Democratic presidential candidate, and to go after radical Islam in wake of last week's Paris terrorist attacks. Referring to Clinton's recent comment on having empathy for the views of America's enemies, Jindal is planning to say, "Our former Secretary of State in America recently said that we need to 'show respect for our enemies' and 'empathize with their perspective and point of view.' Well, yes, understanding our enemies as a means of destroying them, I’m all for that. But empathizing with them as if perhaps we can find some common ground, I have no interest in that kind of mindless naiveté." He'll continue: Let me be blunt about this. I want America’s allies to trust us and respect us, and I want our enemies to fear us. Every day our enemies spend their time trying to avoid our justice is a day they are not plotting against us. And I fear that in recent years this has not been the case. The events of the past several years clearly suggest that America’s allies are often less than certain that they can count on us, and our enemies too often do not fear us. Of course, as Americans we want all people to live in harmony, and we do not desire to have any enemies. But the simple truth is that we do, but that is not of our doing.