EFTA01800496.pdf

From: Jeevacation <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 6:22 PM To: Marc Hauser Subject: Re: a few things Phone fri Sent from my iPhone On Sep 14, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Marc Hauser c: a. > wrote: hmmm...interesting. can you say more? -marc On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Jeevacation «mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: I went to Cambridge Sunday,just stay quiet Sent from my iPhone On Sep 14, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Marc Hauser «mailto: <mailto > wrote: jeffrey i spoke with david baltimore's attorney, who has handled other cases like mine, and is involved in one now. he had a very different take: i should go straight to ORI (feds), give them a 2-3 page summary of why my case is not misconduct, and work with them to show them that harvard provided the wrong analysis, and there were dreadful procedural mistakes, including confidentiality breaches, failure to provide evidence in time, etc. He was much more proactive. Dersh and Schneider are very defensive and reactive. He said that ORI hates harvard, and is aware of procedural problems. In any case, i sent him some materials to review. such different opinions, and hard to know what to do. also, major start up costs with a new lawyer, though schneider will talk with him. what do your instincts say? any thoughts on the negotiation issue with harvard, retirement, etc? -marc --- Marc EFTA_R1_00140111 EFTA01800496 --- Marc 2 EFTA_R1_00140112 EFTA01800497