📄 Extracted Text (429 words)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
AND AIIILIATID PARTNCRSHIPS
Citigroup Center
153 East 53rd Street
New York, New York 10022-4611
Jay P. Lefkowitz, Facsimile:
To Call Writer Directly: (212) 446-4800 (212) 446.4900
212 ...4 6.4r..
December 26, 2007
VIA FACSIMILE (305) 530-6444
Honorable R. Alexander Acosta
United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of Florida
99 NE 4th Street
Miami, FL 33132
Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Dear Alex:
I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last
week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our position on two issues: (1) our view on
your latest proposal regarding notification to the alleged victims under 18 U.S.C. § 3771; and (2)
our response to your proposed language regarding the 18 U.S.C. § 2255 component of the
deferred-prosecution agreement (the "Agreement"). Before I turn to these questions, I would
like to reiterate that this letter responds to your invitation to discuss proposed modifications to
the Agreement and should not be construed in any way as a breach of the Agreement. With that
said, I must tell you that the more I look into these issues, the more difficulties I see in trying to
tie the resolution of a federal criminal matter with a federal civil matter involving minors, and
this is even further complicated when the premise of the resolution is a deferred federal
prosecution conditioned on a plea to specific state offenses with a specific sentence pre-
determined and required to be imposed by the state court, without consideration of the fact that
the State view of this case differs dramatically from yours. With that in mind, I turn to each of
your questions below.
First, although we appreciate your willingness to modify your Office's § 3771 notice,
which is embodied in your latest proposal, we must still object to aspects of your proposal on the
ground that notice under § 3771 is per se inapplicable to this case under the Attorney General's
own guidelines, because the alleged victims are not "crime victims" under § 3771. The Attorney
General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance defines "crime victim" as follows:
For the purpose of enforcing the rights enumerated in article I.B, a victim is 'a person
directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an
offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in
Federal district court. If a victim is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or
Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington...
EFTA00617213
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
1cea5c9afd2782e8df25d4ca7c3f84591f8efec2b3e38407e5d0d819b0ac1930
Bates Number
EFTA00617213
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0