EFTA00617212
EFTA00617213 DataSet-9
EFTA00617214

EFTA00617213.pdf

DataSet-9 1 page 429 words document
D6 P17 V16 V11 V14
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (429 words)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AIIILIATID PARTNCRSHIPS Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 Jay P. Lefkowitz, Facsimile: To Call Writer Directly: (212) 446-4800 (212) 446.4900 212 ...4 6.4r.. December 26, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE (305) 530-6444 Honorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Alex: I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our position on two issues: (1) our view on your latest proposal regarding notification to the alleged victims under 18 U.S.C. § 3771; and (2) our response to your proposed language regarding the 18 U.S.C. § 2255 component of the deferred-prosecution agreement (the "Agreement"). Before I turn to these questions, I would like to reiterate that this letter responds to your invitation to discuss proposed modifications to the Agreement and should not be construed in any way as a breach of the Agreement. With that said, I must tell you that the more I look into these issues, the more difficulties I see in trying to tie the resolution of a federal criminal matter with a federal civil matter involving minors, and this is even further complicated when the premise of the resolution is a deferred federal prosecution conditioned on a plea to specific state offenses with a specific sentence pre- determined and required to be imposed by the state court, without consideration of the fact that the State view of this case differs dramatically from yours. With that in mind, I turn to each of your questions below. First, although we appreciate your willingness to modify your Office's § 3771 notice, which is embodied in your latest proposal, we must still object to aspects of your proposal on the ground that notice under § 3771 is per se inapplicable to this case under the Attorney General's own guidelines, because the alleged victims are not "crime victims" under § 3771. The Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance defines "crime victim" as follows: For the purpose of enforcing the rights enumerated in article I.B, a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court. If a victim is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington... EFTA00617213
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
1cea5c9afd2782e8df25d4ca7c3f84591f8efec2b3e38407e5d0d819b0ac1930
Bates Number
EFTA00617213
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!