📄 Extracted Text (1,169 words)
From: Halperin, Alan S
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 5:28 PM
To: jeffrey E.; Brad Wechsler; Ada Clapp
Cc: Finkelstein, Brad
Subject: Re:
Thanks. Our finance partner will review comments. As for the interest rate,=please recall history: you suggested
following terms of B of A loan, which=included reference to LIBOR plus; we wanted to make sure that the amount w=s
no less than AFR; we wanted a cap in case LIBOR rose significantly; and you instructed us to remove cap.=/div>
Alan S. Halperin I Partner
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison =LP
1285 Avenue of the Americas I New York,&=bsp;NY 10019-6064
(Direct Phone) I (Direct Fax) I www.paulweiss.com
From: jeffrey E.
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 11:26 AM
To: Brad Wechsler; Ada Clapp; Halperin, Alan S
Subject:
my thoughts on the promissory note
"Event of Default"
(a) before there is a defa=lt for a failure to perform, a 5 day period runs from the occurrence =f any failure to perform or
observe any covenant or agreement contained in=the note. There is no obligation to give notice of the failure and an
opportunity to cure in 5 days. Just a f=ilure to perform and then a default if not corrected within 5 days of the =ailure.
Notice by the Noteholder of the Payor's failure should=be required first and then a 5 day cure period.
(b) the language of this E=ent of Default is as follows: "Any representation, warranty or =tatement made by or on behalf
of Payor in this note or in any other document delivere= in connection [t]herewith shall prove to have been incorrect in
any m=terial respect when made or at any future date." I have issues with all the underline= language. Who is making
statements on behalf of Payor? What o=her documents are being referred to? The representations, warranties= and
statements should be required to be "expressly made in writing" otherwise arguments about implied reps, warranties
and s=atements might be made. Finally, making it a breach when any represe=tation, warranty or statement becomes
incorrect at any future date is too =pen-ended.
(d) Making it an event of =efault in this provision if the note ceases to be "in full, force and=effect, valid or enforceable",
though not unheard of, obviously limit= the ability to defend against an enforcement action.
"Interest Rate". Why is it the greater of the Long Ter= AFR or LIBOR plus .25%. Why not just the long Term AFR?
"Note Obligations" includes "any indemnification obl=gations under this Note." I did not see any "indemnifica=ion"
under the Note. I did see a requirement to pay enforcemen= costs, but that is not an "indemnification".
EFTA_R1_01335067
EFTA02353963
Section 3.2(b) - Requires the Payor to notify the Noteholder promptly =ut in any event no later than 5 business days
upon the Payor becoming awar= of "any material adverse change in Payor's financial position.&=8221; What is a
material adverse change? Too open ended .!=br>
Section 3.4 also makes reference to the Initial Net Worth statement pr=vided pursuant to Section 5.1 and requires the
Payor, as of December 31 =f each year, to maintain a Net Worth of not less than 110% of the then out=tanding principal
amount. It defines net worth as total assets minus=leons total liabilities.?
Section 3.5 prohibits the Payor from incurring "any liens or =ny debt for bored money if the incurrence of any such debt
or liens would =ave a material adverse effect on Payor's ability to make the payment= contemplated by this Note as
such payments become due." "Material Adverse Effect" is too =ague and open-ended.
Section 3.6 requires Payor to "furnish Noteholder with such a=ditional information as Noteholder shall reasonably
request in order to en=ble Noteholder to determine whether the terms, covenants, provisions and c=nditions of this
Note have been complied with by Payor." This seems like a very broad license to re=uire Leon to provide info,
particularly financial info, at any time. =This is especially true when terms like "material adverse effect"= are used to
trigger reporting obligations and violations of debt covenants.
Section 6.2. Waivers of presentment, demand, protest, notice of =ntent to accelerate, notice of acceleration of
maturity, notice of protest= notice of non-payment, except as are expressly provided in the Note are n=t unusual or
overreaching, but they do limit Leon's defenses to enforcement actions. The consent i= Section 6.2(b) to "all waivers of
any term hereof", is probably intended a= a consent to the Noteholder waiving an enforcement term against the Payor=
but could be interpreted to mean that Payor even consents to waivers of a=y term that provides the Payor with any
protections like prior notice, for example. This should be modified to make it c=ear that it is only a consent to a waiver
by the Noteholder of any enforcement term of the Note.
Section 6.3 permits an assignment of the Note by the Noteholder withou= consent by the Payor. Leon's consent should
be required if th= Notheolder wants to assign the note.
Section 6.4 makes Leon responsible to pay any stamp or oth=r documentary taxes that are due in connection with the
execution or deliv=ry of this Note. What are they? If there are none, then delete=this provision.
Section 6.5 seems to make the Payor liable for the costs and expenses =f the Noteholder's "attempted enforcement" of
the Note. That could be=read to make Leon liable even if the Noteholder improperly commenced an en=orcement
action and Leon won that case. It should only be payable i= the Noteholder is the prevailing party. Moreover why not
make this a reciprocal provision, so that if the Noteholder commences =ction and the Payor is the prevailing party then
the Noteholder pays cost =nd expenses? Also, the Note provides that the Payor should pay the c=sts and expenses
incurred in any workout? Why?
Section 6.7 Jury Trial waiver is an attempt to exclude a jury from hea=ing a dispute over the Note because the amounts
are so big, and that might=impact the ability to get a proper result. Why not arbitration?
please note
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute
inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use,
2
EFTA_R1_01335068
EFTA02353964
disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
This message is intended only fo= the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is privileged a=d
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby not=fied that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. =lf you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies =f the
message and its attachments and notify us immediately.
date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1450027704 flags 8590195717 gmail-label-ids 18 5 remote-id 570085
3
EFTA_R1_01335069
EFTA02353965
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
1e248d755f6d34e19117862be3084b52033fc548f0d3f83b06538d93afa80aa7
Bates Number
EFTA02353963
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0