podesta-emails

podesta_email_01909.txt

podesta-emails 3,413 words email
P17 V11 P18 P22 P20
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *Main Topics:* Surrogates respond to Clark's remarks and predictions on future terror attacks, McCain's free trade campaign, McSame on Social Security *Summary of Shift:* Obama's faith-based program initiative was the centerpiece for tonight's political coverage. Several programs report that tomatoes may not be the source of a recent salmonella outbreak. Reports on the commander of the SS Cole, the Christian left and shock hazards the US soldiers face in their showers in Iraq were also featured stories. Bobby Jindal faces an angry constituency and state legislature in the face of a controversy over legislative pay raises. In lieu of increased likelihood that Israel will strike Iran imminently an Iranian foreign minister declares Iran will make no distinction between an attack from Israel or the US. Highlights 1) McCain surrogates on the airwaves a. CNN: Rudy Giuliani raises the specter of future terror attack on US soil b. MSNBC: Pfotenhauer claims Bush's Iraq policy was unpopular with himself 2) McCain's free-trade campaigning a. CNN: Panel finds McCain's strategy utterly laughable b. MSNBC: Maddow makes the Black-Colombia connection c. MSNBC: McCain's travels are likely a way to court the Latino vote 3) MSNBC: Panelists expect McCain to distance himself from Bush on Social Security 4) CNN: Independent contractors will no longer be under immunity in Iraq [no clip] 5) FNC: Shepard Smith covers McCain's claim that Obama will pack the Supreme Court with liberals 6) CNN: John McCain plans to hold a softball tournament in lieu of a ban on fireworks in Arizona [no clip] 7) CNN: McCain campaign pulls web ad on site that links Obama followers to followers of Adolph Hitler [no clip] 8) CNN: Iraq goes through near-catastrophic gas shortages [no clip] 9) FNC: Comparison of Obama's and McCain's platform on nuclear power [no clip] 10) CNN: Comparison of Obama's and McCain's energy, economic and tax platform [no clip] 11) MSNBC: Olbermann reports: McCain doesn't know the price of gas [no clip] 12) MSNBC: *Hardball* reports on Roberta McCain being "muzzled" [no clip] 13) MSNBC: During segment on Gen Clark's comments, lower-third of screen bar reads, "2003: McCain Says War Service Doesn't Qualify You For Pres." [no clip] Clips Highlight #1 *Rudy Giuliani: 'The Safe Thing is to Assume They're Gonna Attack Us Again' *(CNN 07/01/08 5:30pm) [Clip opens with summary of John McCain's appearance at the Sherriff's Association, moves to excerpt of Clark's statement and then to interview.] RUDY GIULIANI: [laughing] John McCain's not running as a fighter pilot. John McCain has also been a United States Senator, United States Congressman; he's probably been one of the most active—maybe even, in some ways, a controversial—member of the United States Senate by taking on a leadership role, which he even stood up against his own party. JOHN ROBERTS: But he is using his military service as a centerpiece to burnish his credentials on national security. GIULIANI: I think he's using his many, many years of experience in the United States Senate, going all over the world, being involved in negotiations and discussions on almost every single world issue. To try to say that John McCain is running as a fighter pilot is kinda—I mean, it's laughable. ROBERTS: Is Senator McCain— GIULIANI: The difference is—and I think this is why Wesley Clark is doing this—Senator Obama has no experience. Senator Obama has a very short career in the United States Senate, where he's accomplished nothing compared to John McCain who's past landmark legislation and, before that, he was in the state legislature. So, when you put the two resumes against each other, one has the background and experience to take on the most difficult job in the world. The other there's a real question mark about. ROBERTS: Is Senator McCain any more qualified on national security than you are? GIULIANI:* Is Senator McCain more qualified? He certainly has more experience than I have.* I think I know quite a bit about national security because I've been in the Justice Department. I've negotiated with foreign governments. I've traveled to 35 countries. I just got back from Kazakhstan, but I consider John McCain one of the premiere experts on national security in our country right now. ROBERTS: Because I remember back in September of 2007 he said this about your experience. He said, 'I think the nation respects the mayor's leadership after 9/11 and I do too. I don't think it translates necessarily, into foreign policy or national security expertise. I know of nothing in his background that indicates he has any experience in it, with him or Romney.' GIULIANI: I think that John—we were running against each other then and we say things about each other I think if John— ROBERTS: You say things that aren't true? GIULIANI: Well I think John maybe wasn't focusing on the fact that I was the third-ranking official in the Justice Department, that I had a lot of contact with Interpol, that I negotiated with two or three foreign governments, that I've been in—I've been on 90 foreign trips in the last six years alone, that I've lead delegations. I've had a good deal of foreign policy experience, but, if you're asking me, 'Has John?' John has had just about the most of anyone that has ever run for president. ROBERTS: But do you think he's more qualified to be president than you are? GIULIANI: I thought I was the best qualified to be president and I once announced in a debate […], if I wasn't running, John McCain would be my candidate. So, for personal reasons, […] I though I was the best qualified, but I thought John was number two. ROBERTS: Doesn't that mean […] you're better able to handle national security? GIULIANI: *It isn't just about foreign policy.* It isn't just about domestic policy. It's about a whole array of things. I'm not a candidate. I'm not a choice. John was my number two choice after me and I got out of the race when I did because I was so convinced it was important for the country that John McCain get nominated. I didn't want to stand in the way of him. ROBERTS: Senator Joe Lieberman said something the other day that took some people by surprise. He predicted that America will be the subject of another terrorist attack on the homeland, in early 2009 […]. Many people out there—democrats mostly—are saying, 'Hey! He's playing into the politics of fear here.' GIULIANI: I don't think the Senator's doing that. I think that what the Senator's trying to do is deal with something that's almost inscrutable, which is, how to interpret what these terrorists were gonna do. *Here's the safe thing for us to do: the safe thing for us to do is to assume they're gonna attack us again and to be prepared for it.* ROBERTS: Do you believe there will be an attack? Are you as convinced as he is? GIULIANI: Do I believe that they are attempting to attack us again? Absolutely. Do I know if they'll be successful at it? I hope not. They have attempted to attack us again ROBERTS: But [Lieberman] was pretty definitive about this, saying that there will be a terror attack in early 2009. GIULIANI: But excess of caution—*you're better off assuming there's gonna be an attack.* ROBERTS: So would you make that prediction? I would not predict a time and what I would say is, *'We should be on guard that there will be an attack. They are attempting to attack us. We are attempting to stop them. You cannot always be 100% perfect.'* I was in London for the attacks in London a few years ago and it was a very eerie experience, having been in New York, sort of at the center of that group of attacks and then in London, a half-block away from the Liverpool station where the first bomb went off. So I'm the last one that's ever gonna discount the possibility of an attack. ROBERTS: […] There appears to be a direct connection between camps in Pakistan and what happened there in London on July 7th. Do you believe the Unite States should be more active in chasing down terrorists in Pakistan? GIULIANI: […] I've been saying that for quite some time. […] Pakistan is an independent government with nuclear weapons. That's gotta be worked about but it's gotta be worked out in a way that we achieve our objective. ROBERTS: […] do you believe there is any place for Osama Bin Laden in the American judicial system? GIULIANI: This is a military matter. It's not a judicial—but this is part of the problem with the whole Barack Obama campaign and the whole democratic approach to this. They want to treat this as a criminal justice matter and it isn't. This is the thing we failed to see in 1993 when they attacked us at the World Trade Center. It was treated purely as a criminal justice matter. We gotta get beyond that. This is a war. This is a situation in which they have attacked us. They've attacked us over and over again. We've been very fortunate since September 11, 2001—since we've been on offense under President Bush—not to have a domestic attack. If we go back into this, 'let's treat this as a criminal justice matter solely,' I believe we're gonna put our country in much more jeopardy. At least, that's my opinion. ROBERTS: […] You were quite happy to have them prosecuted in the justice system [in 1993]. Why not now? GIULIANI: That's because I didn't know then what I know now. I don't criticize the people for doing that back then. ROBERTS: So are you saying you were wrong for saying that back then? GIULIANI: I didn't know the facts that I know now. What I have said since September 11 is, 'If we knew back in 1993 what we found out on September 11, we should have treated this as a long-term terrorist issue.' Now, knowing those facts, why would you want to go back to treating it purely as a criminal justice matter? ROBERTS: So you were premature in those comments? I didn't have the facts at that time. When I got the facts, I changed my mind. *Pfotenhauer: McCain's Surge Policy "Was Particularly Unpopular With President Bush," Defends McCain Against Fear-Mongering Charges* (MSNBC 07/01/08 10:54am) MONICA NOVOTNY: Are Republicans flaying the fear card in arguing John McCain's foreign policy experience? Last week McCain's chief strategist came under fire for saying an attack in the United States would benefit his candidate. This week it is Joe Lieberman's turn. McCain supporters saying that his candidate would be the one that would be best prepared if there were a terror attack in 2009. [clip of Lieberman] NOVOTNY: […] So Nancy, two men both tied to the McCain campaign talking about terrorist attacks alongside the candidate's credentials. Is this playing into the vote fears? NANCY PFOTENHAUER: I don't think so. I think it's discussing what's obviously on the minds of many American voters and on the front page of most newspapers […] My own poll of one, if you will, is that we've been spending as much or more time talking about the economy and particularly the energy crisis as we have been the concerns […] and the challenges we face in the national security arena. […] PFOTENHAUER: *As you recall, when Senator McCain challenged the surge, […] or challenged the current strategy in Iraq and was pushing the surge, alongside General Petraeus, this was incredibly unpopular here in Washington. It was particularly unpopular with President Bush.* And he did it because that's when he felt was right on the ground. And he put the interests of the country first. History has shown that he was right on that call. NOVOTNY: Let's get back to Lieberman's comments. White House spokesman Dana Perino said that she agreed was Senator Lieberman. Is this part now of some October Surprise strategy at play? PFOTENHAUER: Not at all. That I can attest to. […] Senator Lieberman, is, of course, known as one of the most analytical and thoughtful members of the U.S. Senate. I think he was doing an historical analysis, which is really how show approaches almost any issue.[…] Highlight #2 *Panel Finds McCain's Free Trade Campaigning Decision Questionable* (CNN 07/01/08 8:24pm) KITTY PILGRIM: Senator McCain [is] traveling to Colombia, then going to Mexico. Just fill me on what you think this strategy—how this makes sense, Steve. STEVE COCHRAN: Well, I'm not sure that it does, from a political standpoint because swing states being crucial and swing states being in the economic position they're in—it's tough. You can argue all you want about this being a new economy and a world-wide economy, until the rest of the world plays by the same rules and standards that we hold America to the imbalance is just gonna get bigger and bigger and people are gonna lose jobs. So we can make the rules and we can keep our end of the bargain, but the people we're dealing with aren't doing their share. China's a fine example of that on the other end of the world. […] WILMER LEON: […] when Senator McCain's primary solutions seem to be improving programs for unemployed workers and increasing unemployment benefits or continuing unemployment benefits instead of really trying to find tangible and workable solutions, in terms of how we're gonna stop this country from hemorrhaging jobs. [Airs a segment from McCain's free trade commercial with Spanish subtitles.] PILGRIM: [attempting to contain laughter] It really is hard to see how this is going to sell…. [Panel laughs collectively] […] MARK SIMONE: [also attempting to contain laughter] Basically some people wonder: Does McCain even really want to win this and why [Pilgrim chuckles] even bring this up? It's like campaigning with a Halliburton jacket on. COCHRAN: And an Enron hat. [laughter] SIMONE: This would be like Obama taking Wesley Clark to dinner tonight. I mean, why would you even do this? It's like the third rail of the subway—stay away from it! LEON: [McCain] also wants to equate people who want to even negotiate or discuss this issue—he equates them to be isolationists and protectionists and these are a lot of people who just want to keep their jobs. They just want to feed their families. There's nothing—well, you're protecting your job—but there's nothing isolationist about wanting to feed your family. [Pilgrim introduces new CNN/Opinion research poll from June 26-29: Foreign trade is a threat to economy – 51% Opportunity for economic growth – 41%] PILGRIM: […] if you look at it over time that 51% […] has come up from 35% in the year 2000. So increasingly Americans are starting to see these lopsided trade policies as a threat to their economy. SIMONE: *That's why you gotta wonder about McCain's judgment.* It wasn't necessary to even do this. Why did he even bother? COCHRAN: Well because you know, he doesn't want to be accused of flip-flopping on it, but *he is literally at a tipping point here and he needs to go very quiet on this issue and not deal with it and move forward on other things because the damage done by flip-flopping is nothing compared to the damage he's gonna do if he sticks to this line.* PILGRIM: By taking the wrong subject to the American public […]. [The panel moves to a discussion of Obama's evangelical outreach.] SIMONE: […] McCain is weak there. McCain doesn't speak their language. If he is a very religious guy, he's kept it very private. […] *McCain's Colombia Trip Puts Black "Back Under the Microscope" *(MSNBC 07/01/08 6:30pm) RACHAEL MADDOW: *Because of this Colombia trip, back under the microscope now is McCain's campaign advisor, Charlie Black, whose lobbying firm has represented Colombian oil interests.* Black isn't going with McCain to Colombia but McCain choosing this trip, this country, ensures more headlines about Charlie Black and about the lobbyists and ex-lobbyists who are in McCain's inner circle. *Michelle, do you think McCain thinks the lobbyist controversy has blown over? That it's too complicated an issue to do him any real political harm?* MICHELLE BERNARD*: I think he probably would've thought that until this program aired tonight . . . otherwise he would not be taking this trip right now. This is the issue that will not go away* . . . it is very difficult to get away from people who have not been lobbyists in some capacity whatsoever . . . *I think the McCain campaign is going to just stop talking about the problem with lobbyists as much as possible and hope that that's an issue that will go away.* [. . .] MADDOW: . . . is this a liability for McCain at this point or is it something that he's put past him? *McCain has Little Support for his Immigration Platform but Colombia Trip Lets Him Campaign Across the US *(MSNBC 07/01/08 5:10pm) ANDREA MITCHELL: . . . John McCain really got killed among the conservative base, the Republican base, for the position that he took on immigration, where he aligned himself with George Bush. So he's not getting credit from the Hispanic community at the same time as he's getting killed among the base. CHUCK TODD: And well part of it, he's changed his rhetoric too . . . but look, this trip to Colombia and then to Mexico, he's going to visit some very important religious symbols to . . . Catholic Hispanics. He's going to get saturation coverage with the Hispanic media here in the United States. This is . . . as if he's courting New Mexico voters and Florida voters and Arizona voters and Colorado voters by going to Colombia. Highlight #3 *McCain Expected to Push McDifferent on Social Security *(MSNBC 07/01/08 6:25pm) RACHAEL MADDOW*: . . . a new Gallup poll shows . . . 68% who say they are worried, to a certain extent, that McCain is too close to Bush. Smelling blood, the DNC is now running another ad linking McCain and Bush . . .* [DNC ad comparing Bush and McCain on Social Security runs] MADDOW: Is Social Security another issue on which we should expect McCain to try to put some distance between himself and Bush? Does McCain need a few more issues where he can say, "Look, I disagree with the president"? . . . GENE ROBINSON: Well, I don't see how he can do it on Social Security . . . he's taken the position that private accounts would be necessary to save the system. You know, that's really one of the traditional electric third rails of politics and I can't imagine that stance is really going to do McCain a lot of good, either in trying to distance himself from George Bush or simply in trying to get elected president. JOHN HARWOOD: . . . he could renounce privatization. There's been some ambiguity between McCain and his advisors on exactly what he supported, whether he was going to go back Bush's route and look, even if you support privatization, it is plain . . . that's not going anywhere. So what John McCain could do in a bold stroke was renounce it . . . MADDOW: I think that we're beginning to see a little bit of that in the way *that he has distanced himself from the word "privatization" even though he is still saying he is in favor of private accounts* . . . -- Jacob Roberts PAO 208.420.3470 (c) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "big campaign" group. To post to this group, send to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] E-mail [email protected] with questions or concerns This is a list of individuals. It is not affiliated with any group or organization. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
👁 1 💬 0
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
1e29271dde53e17e52b956c2c83bdf190eb60c2d41b0a3971b845f4923d969a5
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!