EFTA01308033.pdf

Case S09-CY806ESPDAI ' Dominant 59 ',teed on FLSD Docked 077102009 Page 1 0110 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO 2 CASE NO: 08.CV.80119-MARRALIOHNSON PlainSP vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Delendanl JANE DOE NO 3 CASE NO: 08.CY-80232-MARRA/JOHN SON Plawtstt vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. DNendanl JANE DOE NO. 4. CASE NO 08.CV.803.80.MARRAJJOHN SON Planta vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Oefendani SDNY_GM_00328555 EFTA 00201307 EFTA01308033 Cato 9 Oc., cs AAA. Don:sent 39 Emoted on FLSD Docket 07/7012009 Page 2 of 10 CASEMO: ISCV4011P4IARRAMOMOISON JANE DOE NO 5. CASE NO: ISCV-1031141ARRAIJO NNSON Flambe vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Delonlant JANE DOE NO 6 CASE NO: 00CV40014-MAR RA/JOHNSON Planter Y9. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant JANE DOE NO 7. CASE NO: 00-CV-5099,341AR RAFJOHNSON Piamdf vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Deiendanl 2 SDNY_GM_00328556 EFTA_00201308 EFTA01308034 Case 9 I YAM flocometni 39 Enleled an FIST/Docket 07/10/2009 Page 3 of 10 CASt NO 0.8-CV 80119.MARRAVONNSON CASE NO: 0S.CV-80811-MARRAfJOHNSON C IAA. PLatnefl vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant JANE DOE, CASE NO 08.CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/ JOHNSON Remelt Vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et el Defendant DOE II CASE NO: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/JOHN SON Plamtfl vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. et al Detendadts SDNY_GM_00328557 EFTA 00201309 EFTA01308035 Case P r :A KAIA Document 39 Entered on ELS() Docket 07/1012009 Page 4 of 10 CASE NO: 08-CV.4014-41ARRNJOHNSON JANE DOE NO 101. CASE NO 09LVA0591-MARRAQOHNSON Plaintiff vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant JANE DOE NO 102. CASE NO 09-CV 4306S6MARRAMOHNSON Plarnhff H. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Delecsdant PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO FIRST REQUEST FOR ADIMSSIONS TO DEFENDANT PLAINTFF'S theme,' Jane Doe. hereby moves this Coon fcc an cyder competing defendant, Jeffrey Epstein to answer ner first reouOSIS for admrssiOns or. on mo alternative. to prove Mat Ms invocation of his Fifth Amendment pnwtegre is Proper Jane (Afro haS propowstal 23 requests for admission to Epstein includeng SuCh straightforward etvpuera as • YO.It net worth is greater than SI Maim 4 SDNY_GM_00328558 EFTA_0020 I 3 I () EFTA01308036 Case n KiM Document 39 Entered on ELSE) Docket 02/102009 Page 5 of 10 CASE NO 00.Cv400944ARRAo0HNSON • You Own or control. &reedy or indirectly. real estate properly in foreign counties • You are moving significant financial assets overseas outside of the direct lerrilOrial reach Of me U S and Florida Co•rt9 • You currently have the ability to post a bond of St!, mtrupo to satisfy a judgment in this Case without financial or Other difficulty In response to each and every one of these questons Epstein has given the following reSpunie in response Defendant asserts his U S cOnStity/Oenal pnvieges as &heated herein I intend to respond to al relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit however my attorneys have counsele d me that I cannot trendy answers to any discovery relevant to this tavvsuti and 1 must accept this aCtuee or nak brig my Sixth Amendm ent right to effective representation Accordingly. I assert my federal constitutional rights under he Firm Sixth. and Fourteenth Amendm ents as guaranteed by the United Stales Constitution Drawing an adverse inference tinier these amunistances would unconstitutionally burden my overate of my consblutional rights would be unreason able and wOuld therefore violate the Constitution This Court should Order Epstein to answer arl of the requests for adrinSiOn Or, in to alternates, prose Mat his F6th Amendm ent invocations are valet It is for the <Oen not the datmoni to determine %harbor the hazard of incrimina tion is iusbbed United States v Argennarur, 925 F 2d 1349. 1355 (11th Cr 1991) 'A gout must make a particularized inquiry deOding in Connection with each specific area that the clueshmffnel dart. wishes to explore, whether or nor the IffmffIlea swet-founded' ld Iffsbeliv this is done in an in Camera proceedin g wherein the person asserting the Foveae° is oven the cfpOrlunty sLaostanhate his claims of the privilege and the 5 SDNY_GM_00328559 EFTA_0020 13 I I EFTA01308037 Case 9 0ri r v chl Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 07,10120119 Page 6 of 10 CASE NO. 01-Cve011eefARRArJOHNSON district coca re able to censyler the queshons asked and be documents requested by the summons - al lete Epstein has made boilerplate invocation of the Fifth Amendment to each and every question propounded by Jane Doe. et:ruched for exams* a request that he admit that her net worth is more than $500 mace It is not apparent how admitting hp net worth is incrumnating in the circumstances of this case In any event the Fifth Antendmeet dote not operate n the fashion it is Epszein's obegehon to expain his claims ce weer embr question basis • la Ihe only issue before the Court is Eastern's Filth Amendment privilege Epstein has only asserted a Fifth Amendment oblecbon to production As a result any other objections to ~Mellon are deemed waned Soo Local Rule 26 1G 3l3) ('Ay ground IfOr an °hereon' not slated in an objection within the time provided by the Federal Rules 04 O71 Prnredure aly estensiens thereof shall he waived') SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION For thn converwerce or he ChM - and in compliance with Local Rue 26 1 H (Party Slinc iv lea to compel shall list seeofic requests in SuccesSiOn) - Jane Don requests for admission are 45 follows I Yinml worth is greater than 5 It) million 2 Your net worth re greater than 550 ribbon 3 Your net worth is greater than 5100 mace 4 Your net worm is (realm than $500 Nihon 5 Your net worth is greater Man 51 blew G SDNY_GM_00328560 EFTA_0020 13 12 EFTA01308038 Case 9 0! -cf.& Vara tscinthent 39 Entered on Fist) DOckel 07/1072009 Page 7 of 10 CASE NO: 0eCV401i9-ALARRAQOHNSON 6 Since being ncarccratod you have dreary or indirectly (through the seances or asstslauce of other perSOns). conveyed money or assets man attempt to insulate Or protect your money or assets from being captured in any civil lawsuits fled against yOu 7 You own or control *redly or indirectly. real estate property in the Cahhbeen You osn or control directly or indirectly. real estate property in forego Mattes 9 In the last 2 years yeti have transferred assets dad/or money and/or financoal instruments In cnunthes outside the United States 10. You have provided financial support to the modeling agency MC 2 11 You have Committed sexual assault against Plaintiff, a minor /2 You committed battery against Plaint!! 13 Y119 neffallY ponesalnd Plaintiff when she was a minor la You offered Plaintiff more money Contingen t upon her having sex stet your or giving you Oral sex '5 You intended to harm /garneff when you et:fin-need these sexual acts against hat '6 You knew Plaintiff was tinder the age of 16 when you sexually touczed and fondled her 17 You intend to hire investigators to intimidate and haraSS Plaintiff diming this libgatiOn IS You were engaged in the act of trafficking rune's across state or country bmderr for the purposes ol sex or prOsbtuti on between 2000 and the present 7 SDNY_GM_00328561 EFTA_0020 13 13 EFTA01308039 Case , P' (r :AI Comment 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/104200 9 Psge 8 of 10 CASE NO. ORCV-80, 194IARRArlOM NSON '9 You coerced Plaintiff into being a prostitulo and remaining in prostitution 20 Yeti are guilty of the lohovong offens es aeons( Jane Doe A Procuring a mMor for the purpose of prostitution as defined n F S 796 03. B Uattory as defined by Florida Statutes C Sermal Battery 7I You are moving Hgnificant financial assets Overseas. outsid e of the direct fernforre rearri of Me It S and Florida Courts 22 You are maxim asset transfers with the intent to defeat any judgm ent that mot be entre° against yOu in this or smiler cases 73 You currently have the atelsly to post a bond of $15 m.Lon to Satisfy a eldgenent in thus cane weevil financial or other difficulty CONCLUSION Fre ail 'hese reasons the Court should compel Epstein 10 answer the requests ler adenine,' nr provide a patheu lanZed justifical on fOt h5 Fifth Amendment invocation with regard ro each request Counsel for Jane Doe have conferred with opposing counsel On the issues raised n Mrs motion and no resolution was possere DATED July 10 2009 Ftespeclftfiy Sul:mitred. Bradley J Edwards Bradley J Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Ores Blvd Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 522-3456 Facsanle (954) 5274663 Fonda Bar No 542075 Ennai L. 'yr,* .ri.t±a- CUM 8 SDNY_GM_00328562 EFTA_0020 13 14 EFTA01308040 Case 9 0hsutt:r.:, C:la Marksman N Entered cri FLSD nek - 07/10/2009 Page 9 of 10 CASE NO 0aCV-801.9.14ARRA.JOHNS ON and Paul G Cassell Pro Nac Vice 332 $ 1400 E Salt lake City. UT 84112 Tereplione 801.58`5-5202 Facsimile 801.585-6833 &Alan CERTIFICATE OF $ERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 10. 2009. I electronically Ned the foregoing document win Me Clerk Of the Coat usng ClArECF I also catty that the forego ing doarmenl is being sensed Ns day on all parties on Me attach ed Service List in the 'earner specified. either via bansmission of Notices of Electro nic Fend generated by CM/ECF or in some other aumortzrm manner to Mose parties who are not authorized to receive Mediu-le" Med Notice s 01 E rectronse Fling Bradley .1 Ed...raid% 9 SDNY_GM_00328563 EFTA_0020 13 15 EFTA01308041 Case 9 ix, nor” RAM Drturnent 30 Flawed on FLSD Docket 07n0i2000 Page 10 of 10 CASE NO 0ACV40119ASARRAV JOMVSON SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v, Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, South ern District of Florida Jack Alan exadberger Eaa Robert I) moon Esp 'sore Vanua? Garcia Jack Patrick Ha Katherine Winhen Eros What- J n ca lake Paul C.; Casson Richer., Konica Waits Rouen C JotOlsotry AiWno liocOnilz Stuart S W07)0510111 J 10 SDW_GM_00328564 EFTA_00201316 EFTA01308042 Case o •. KAI.I Oornmeol 38 Enleo ed on ELSD Docket 07/10/2009 Par 1of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO 2 CASE NO: 08.CV-80119-MARRALIOHNSON Purnell vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defend:se JANE DOE NO 3. CASE NO 08.CV.80232.MARRAOOHNSON Plantill VS JEFFREY EPSTEIN. th7(6141.1/11 JANE DOE. NO 4. CASE NO: 08.CE-80380-MARRA/JOHN SON Pennon vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant SDNY_GM_00328565 EFTA_0020 13 17 EFTA01308043 Casa 9 09 r.. Moe: •K Docuoton4 38 Enured on FLSD Docket 07/10/2009 Page 2 of 16 CASE NO: OACV4011941ARRAIJOHNSON JANE DOE NO 5 CASE NO: OSCV403814AARRAMOHN SON Plana n JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Delenclanl / JANE DOE. NO 6 CASE NO: OSCV409914AARRA/JOHN SON Plainbff JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant JANE DOF NO 7. CASE NO: 08.CV, 90993.MARRA/JO HNSON Plaintiff VS JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Delendam / 2 SDNY_GM_00328566 EFTA_00201318 EFTA01308044 Casa 9 IKAcv1 4' KAM Downie« 38 Emoted on ELSE/ Docket 07/100009 Page 3 of 16 CASE NO: OACLASO2ISAMARA/JOH NSON CASE NO. 08-C1.1.80811-MAR RAMONNSON C MA Planet! vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. (Mandan( JANE DOE CASE NO. OfICV-80893-CIV MARRAUONNSON Plerteff Vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. ot el l/elmemni DOE II CASE NO: 09.CV-8046 9.MARRAMOHNSON Piaints/I vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN ot andants SDNY_GM_00328567 EFTA_00201319 EFTA01308045 Case rr :010. 8PA1 Dner.mert 38 F.nrered on Ftso Docket 07/10 Ewa Pane 4 of 16 CASE NO. ON-CV.80119.MARRSJOHNSON JANE DOE NO 101. CASE NO 09-CV-80591-MARRAJJOHNSON Painsfl VS JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defer4anl - - - ----- JANE DOE NO 102 CASE NO 09.CV-13065661ARRANOHNSON Planer vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO PLAINTEE'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION Plwaer Jane Doe hereby moves this Court for an order compelling defendant Jeffrey EpsI in pi answer her Psi request In. productce or in me allernatme. to Pove Mal his eiwocatron of his Frith AMOIldneflt priulego Is proper Jane Doe also requests production of a putege log Jane Coe has propounded 16 requests for production mciuding such straighlonvarl requests as requests for production of SDNY_GM_00328568 EFTA_00201320 EFTA01308046 Case 909< r 1 Document 38 Entered on FLSO Docket 07/102019 Page 5 0116 CASE NO: 00-Cv.80IINNARRA,JOHni SON Request No 1 Comes of al belegliOne records. Remarlt No 2 Photos of Me mude of your home located at 358 El Brillo WaY. Palm &mach Moeda that desert the roornts) where massa ges took place Onclod el9 massage table) Request No 10 Corresponde nce between Epstein and federa l mosecutors tteounv No 12 Personal tax returns. Frroues, No 13 Photocopies of Epsten s passp ort. :rers9 No 14 A statement of no' worth, and Iternertf No IC Medical record s In recn,nse to each and every one of Mese reouests Epste in has given the followirm response (with only minor variations hero and there) Defendant is asserting hi U.S constitutional privileges I intend to :espord to aN relevant questi ons regarding this lawsuit however, Women have CounSeted me That my al the present time I cannot select authenscaie and produce docum eccapt ins advice or ents releva nt to this lawsuit and I must nsk loses; my Sixth Amendment right 'permute:mon nocOrdingty. I assert to effective my federal consetutional rights under me NM Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by :he Sults Gonsmitution Dressing an advent inferen United orninttlances would unconstitutio ce unser these nally burden my exercise of 'armmania, rights, would my be umeasonade and would therefo ihn Court/axon re violate Ths Court shoukl order Epstein to provide all of the reques ted information or. in the artemnive Prove that his Firth Amend naent mvocatrons aro valid It is for the court. not Me Clamnnl to determ ine %Memel the hazard d inCrirn elatiOn IS juStrfied owed Slaw: v Atormarnt 925 F 20 1349. 1355 (11th Cu 1991) 'A court must make a parballareed weary deciding m connection with each speatc area Mal the 5 SDNY_GM_00328569 EFTA_00201321 EFTA01308047 Casa 1' 00 cv ^ x'•:.. KARI Document 31 Entered on PLSID Docket 07/10 2073 Page 6 of 16 CASE NO 08-O1410IIAMARRNJOHNS ON Questioning unity wishes l0 explore wMthei or not me pewter is nollifounded ' Id TYPcaily tnis is done in an in carnet a proceeding wherein the person asserting the privilege in caves the opport unity 'to substantiate his claims of the Mintage and the district court is able to consid er (he questions asked and the documents requested by tie summons' Here foetern has made botlemlate mvocabon of the Filth Amendment to each and es=ry rioireal propounded by Jane Due including for example the reque st lot comes/Palermo with federal prosecutors and for production of federal lax returns This obviously is rota request with Fifth Amendment implications as the information has efrOady ham, suer disclosed to the Government Fa a/ 'nage reasons. the Coon Should Compel Epstein to answer the requests Or rant* a orieculanred sustifir.ation for his Fiflh Amendment invocation with regard to each rectasi Pastein's foul and paste' respon se to the request /or produc tion also blatantly Orsregaris the: mcpuiremonts lot arecarng privilege under the Courts local mats Local rule 26 1 G me-y 'needle:thy requir es the preparation of a privile ge log with rescect to all dryairnnMs one, er COmnionieationS (among other thvgsl that are ',simnel(' on the bass Or I.-wedge Epstein Ms failed 10 prepare such a log making it impossible for Jane Doe In effectively chalen ge his generic assertions Indeed, with respect to a few request‘ Epstein has slated Turther the request may include information subject to work paste er an attorn ey-tient envitege O1 course. the whole purpose of forcing a Clefenclms 10 nrepare a (invite ee log is tO face me delendam to decide whether Or not 6 SDNY_GM_00328570 EFTA_00201322 EFTA01308048 Care • fr • o KNµ Da-rinal 38 Entered on FLSO Docket 07/1 0/2009 Page 7416 CASE NO. OhCifit0119 MARR ALJCWNSON ISO:matron is aronleged M asses/bon that something 'may be privileged is cbueusly weedier deRoent The loca l Rules do not parr ot Ma tactic. and Epstein ShOuld be (at a oranady regaled to produce a Prinkce log For all mese reasons the Court should wea l Cation to prondo a faimItege 100 and to answer the inarroga'ones a provide a parteuLanied askatation fa his Fiflh AmoMnw•µ •avroallon with regard to oath rogues-I it shoOsf 1p Mad that huth minor exceptions) the Only grounds on which Epst ein can Herne m anowet the request 404 producton is proof 01 avoid Fifth Amendm ent printer lh(4 the orgy Nam-bon Past an has asserted (with mmor exceptions) As a result any ethee OblePtion s to production are deem ed waived Soo Local Rule 26 IG 3 (al r Any croo n fee an obsectOn ) not sated in an objection wenn the lime provided nv mg Federal Rules 04 CNA Procedure or any extensions there of. Wall be waived SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION Du me convenien ce all the coon - and in ocereltance with Loca l Rule 26 I H (patty 4UN nJNµs to com pel shall list smoke requests in successoon) - Jane Does requests log n•.durte n and Easterns obse tionS are as follows Request No 1 Coen el all telephone f ecoa horn 24432 lisingh 2005 ds n your a your attom char any way relate to you ey's posseSaon by you a that were (including a phone lines used to ['COLIC( girls owned you) feat the purposes of sche dultig massages for DdFUN.I 0 asserting ha U S ocns unhand to all relevant titutronal Privileges I queskons legating this laws mend to xnengys nave ces ed however my Haled me that al the pres ostrx and produce docu ent time I Cannot selec ments relevant to thus t .Mcii dawn) Or alga losing my Lawson and I must Seth Amendment ignt to effective 7 SDNY_GM_00328571 EFTA_0020 I 323 EFTA01308049 Case I 05, • hi.ki i a,amiem 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2039 Page 8 of 16 CASE NO: 01-0/.801111.MARRA/JOHNSON rn(we,entaben Aomrdingty. I assert my federal constituti onal rights under Filth Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by toe United Staler. Constitution Drawn° an adverse inference under these :mai sauces weird unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my ocoStilutional rights. would be unreascnable. and would therefore violate Cnnshlution Realest No 2 MI massage appointment hocks. Manes. computer calendars or ScheMeng &Mies. scheduling books Or any other writing or Correspondence that con is Inc names of any el Ito gals that wore called contacted scheduled Or vino wool to you' home located al 358 El Emile Way Palm Beach Florida. for the Pundelin el eking you a massage /Vs., nt is asserting his U S constitutional privileges I intend to reuse-O re all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit hcmover my itinowif Owe counseled me that al the present lime I cannot select authenticate. and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I mess ACreni this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendm ent right to effective refaesentabon Accordingly I assert my federal constituti onal rights under the Fifth Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United Euives ConStilubun Di iw.ng an adverse inference under these cmcinorlenceS would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my tammaiutional nghis would be umeasonaNe. and would therefore violate c.s.si :talon Negfaint No 3 Any and all doCumentabon in your possession that contains Plaintiffs name ii fees to Plaintiff directly or ndcectty. (includes CeMdels, pads. &ones anpontment hooks COmptAe letters message r pent outs) Deatinnant is asserting has U S constitutional privileges I intend to respect! to all relevant questions regarding this landd however, my alto '!)s have counseled me that at the present time I cannot seed .iciaa and ntoduce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must drips Mt: advice c• risk bang my Sixth Amendment right to effective .opieuk tt font Aeconsingty. I assort my federal Constitutional rights under de Filth. Sixth, awl Fotirinereh Amendments as guaranteed by the United Bram, eferskruhno laraverig an adverse inference under these doCunislanoss would unconsbtuttaually burden my exercise of my :mu lutional rights would be unreasonabka. and would therefore violate to Os's, when Balitleo I.. A AM' and as Photos vdeos downloaded depiction digital prints or any other v.Sual onidi or of any other known or suspecte minor d females introduced to you. dretilv , x motet-ay. by Plaintiff 8 SDNY_GM_00328572 EFTA 00201324 EFTA01308050 Oise 9 Mon/:' KAM Edsnumend 38 Entered on FIST) Docket 07/1012C09 Page 9 of 16 CASE NO: aSCV4O1IS-MAREUVJOHNSON 0oter4 ins i‘ assetting his US constituti onal privileges I intend to reszont to all relevant questons regarding this lawsuit heWever my ancertrtY5 have °weaseled me that al the present erne I cannot select atkienecate. and produce documents relevant to this lawstat and I must accept Pas advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendme