podesta_email_00909.txt

podesta-emails 7,928 words email

P18 V11 P19 D3 P22

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Monday November 17, 2014 Morning Roundup:* *Headlines:* *The Hill: “Will the Obama coalition survive?” <http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/224329-will-the-obama-coalition-survive>* “The coalition of voters that twice elected President Obama to the White House might not be there for the Democratic nominee in 2016, party strategists are warning.” *Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Will Hillary Clinton Be More Accessible to Voters in 2016?” <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/11/17/will-hillary-clinton-be-more-accessible-to-voters-in-2016/>* “Yet if she does run, some Democrats and friends of Mrs. Clinton say they’d like to see her escape from the bubble a bit more, perhaps reveal more of her character and personality than the public ordinarily gets to see.” *Talking Points Memo: “Why Hillary 2016 Thinks She Can Expand Obama's Electoral Map” <http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/hillary-clinton-2016-map?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+(TPMNews)>* “The top minds in the proto-Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign infrastructure are already gaming out Electoral College scenarios.” *San Francisco Chronicle: “New political generation on hold as elder Democrats hang on” <http://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/New-political-generation-on-hold-as-elder-5897425.php#/0>* “Even on the national stage, the Democratic leadership has a distinctly gray tinge. The party’s leading presidential hopeful is Hillary Rodham Clinton, 67, in contrast to a Republican field that could include Sens. Rand Paul, 51, and Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, both 43.” *National Journal: “Obama's Immigration Order Has 2016 Perils for Both Parties” <http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/obama-s-immigration-order-has-2016-perils-for-both-parties-20141116>* “If Obama fails to achieve a small recovery, even a well-known and relatively popular politician like Hillary Clinton will struggle to convince voters they shouldn't back the other party's choice for the White House—a situation not unlike the one that befell John McCain's campaign to replace George W. Bush in 2008.” *Politico: “Obama makes legacy play on trade” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/barack-obama-trade-legacy-112939.html>* “A race to the finish line on TPP in the coming months could also be tricky for Hillary Clinton, who’s seeking to court many of those same critics as she prepares a potential bid for the White House.” *New York Post: “NY GOP Chair: de Blasio will take 2016 nomination over Hillary” <http://nypost.com/2014/11/17/gop-chairman-de-blasio-will-take-nomination-over-hillary-in-2016/>* “Mayor de Blasio — not Hillary Rodham Clinton — will be the Democratic nominee for president in 2016. That’s the jaw-dropping prediction being made by New York’s top Republican, state GOP Chairman Ed Cox, who, as son-in-law to former President Richard Nixon, knows a thing or two about national politics.” *Articles:* *The Hill: “Will the Obama coalition survive?” <http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/224329-will-the-obama-coalition-survive>* By Justin and Amie Parnes November 17, 2014, 6:00 a.m. EST The coalition of voters that twice elected President Obama to the White House might not be there for the Democratic nominee in 2016, party strategists are warning. Following their disastrous showing at the polls this month, many Democrats have consoled themselves with talk of how the groups that fueled Obama’s resounding victories — namely minorities and young people — will make up a bigger slice of the electorate in two years’ time. But some fear the party is placing far too much trust in demographics, while ignoring the unique circumstances that led to Obama’s rise. “I don’t think the Democratic Party should take anyone for granted, or should just assume that these voters are just going to back our nominee, and more importantly, going to turn out for the same level as President Obama,” said Democratic strategist Doug Thornell. “They’re going to need a reason and they’re going to need a message.” Obama won the Electoral College handily in 2008 and 2012, vanquishing the GOP with a coalition of millennials, minorities and women in swing states such as Ohio, Iowa and Colorado. The wave of support gave Obama the former GOP strongholds of Virginia (in both elections) and North Carolina (in 2008), stirring anxious chatter among Republicans about being locked out of the White House for years to come. Obama’s victories, combined with the rising Latino population, have convinced many Democrats that the presidential map is skewing decidedly in their favor. Yet some question whether the supposed advantages will materialize when the name at the top of the ballot isn’t Barack Obama. A former Democratic campaign official stressed that the eventual nominee, whether Hillary Clinton or not, will need to find “new ways to energize our folks.” That need seems particularly acute after the drubbing the party took in the midterms — dismal results due, in part, to overall turnout sliding to its lowest level since 1942. “The messaging we put out there hasn’t been translating,” a senior Democratic operative said. “I don’t want to sugarcoat it. It has been an issue for us.” “We need to try and communicate what’s at stake,” the operative added. Not only did Democrats lose seats in red and purple states this year, they also failed to win the governor’s mansion in deep-blue Illinois, Massachusetts and Maryland, where exit polls showed black and young voters found other things to do on Election Day. “People just stayed home because the candidate didn’t motivate them and didn’t manage to convince them to go to the polls,” Thornell said. But anxious Democrats think there could be more to the problem than that. They note that even when Obama got involved in encouraging his base to vote for the candidates of his choosing, the results were tepid at best. Obama focused intently on turning out the black vote, conducting a series of urban radio interviews and taping commercials for black networks. Despite that, Democrats received a lower percentage of the black vote, and fewer blacks turned out at the polls than in either of Obama’s presidential contests. “The magic of 2008 will be hard to reproduce,” Southern Methodist University professor Cal Jillson said, pointing out that the Democratic advantage among blacks had gone from “10-to-1 to 19-to-1” under Obama. Grover Norquist, the anti-tax advocate known for stringing together political coalitions at the other end of the political spectrum, said Democrats face two major problems. The first: Many of the party’s structural advantages — from volunteer lists to technology infrastructure — were built by Obama’s campaign team, not by the party. The second, he said, is that demographics are not destiny. Norquist said anyone looking at the electorate through the prism of race, gender and ethnicity would miss the rise of “issue voters,” including the swelling numbers of gun-permit holders, homeschoolers or school-voucher recipients in swing states. “The electorate is different today than when Obama got elected — people now have freedoms and rights they didn’t before,” Norquist said. Any Democratic nominee expecting Obama’s supporters to fall into his or her lap will be in for a rude awakening, he said. “They’re not transferable, you can’t hand people off like they are serfs or something,” he said. The 2008 Obama campaign had an additional advantage: the then-senator could clothe himself in the garb of the outsider running against the status quo, all while seeking to make history as the nation’s first black president. Now, the Democratic candidate will be running as the de facto incumbent, associated with Obama’s checkered record to a greater or lesser degree. Polls indicate that a still-lagging economy and the lack of progress on key issues such as immigration reform have wounded the party — and the president — among groups that once offered stalwart support. A Washington Post/ ABC News poll released Nov. 2 showed Obama’s favorability among Hispanics had dropped a staggering 19 points since January. His standing had declined 9 points with blacks and 6 points with independents. The numbers bear a striking resemblance to the pre-Obama world, when the electoral map was less friendly to Democrats. Warnings about the crackup of the Obama coalition have come from none other than David Plouffe, the operational mastermind behind the president’s two White House victories. “We shouldn’t just assume that the Obama voters will automatically come out for Democratic presidential candidates,” Plouffe told The New York Times after the Democrats’ midterm losses. Democrats insist Obama can remedy that situation during his final two years in office and ensure that his coalition endures. Aggressive moves on net neutrality and global warming have already reinvigorated liberals, and expansive action on immigration reform could help bring Latinos back into the fold, they say. There’s also hope among Democrats that the historic nature of a Clinton campaign could lead to a different, but still vibrant, electorate. Strategists say a potential Clinton bid would likely generate outsized enthusiasm among young and single female voters, which could offset drops in other parts of the electorate. “Hillary is going to have to build that excitement in the base the way the president did in 2008. Voters are going to have to truly believe in her path and her vision and get excited by what she stands for,” a former Obama campaign official said. Clinton will have to avoid the notion that she’s the inevitable candidate, the former official added, but can build excitement by emphasizing her place in history as potentially the first woman president. “Done right, I think that can really help her,” the former official said. “Women will love it, and so will other groups, including young voters.” *Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Will Hillary Clinton Be More Accessible to Voters in 2016?” <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/11/17/will-hillary-clinton-be-more-accessible-to-voters-in-2016/>* By Peter Nicholas November 17, 2014, 6:39 a.m. EST Not long ago Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, invited a political reporter to ride in the backseat of an old Volvo as he made a few stops around Keene State College in New Hampshire. “Don’t run over the students,” he cautioned the aide who was driving, when a few kids crossed in front of the car. Mr. Sanders might run for president in the next campaign. Because he’d be a long shot, he can afford to take a few risks and let the press – and by extension, voters – see him in an unscripted setting. Candidates with a better shot at the brass ring would never chance it. Fearing consequences of an incautious comment, they rely on teleprompters and aides, advance staff and security to minimize the sort of spontaneous interactions that can derail a campaign. This brings us to Hillary Clinton. Mrs. Clinton also is contemplating a presidential run, and she stands a far better chance of winning the White House than Mr. Sanders. Don’t count on her opening up her SUV to the national press corps. Yet if she does run, some Democrats and friends of Mrs. Clinton say they’d like to see her escape from the bubble a bit more, perhaps reveal more of her character and personality than the public ordinarily gets to see. Speaking of her last presidential bid, Alan Kessler, a longtime Democratic fundraiser, spoke of “this perception that there was a wall around her.” “Unless you were a hugely important elected official or a major donor, there was no way to touch her,” he said. “It’s this whole aura around her. That’s what doomed her in 2008 and they’re going to have to find a way in this campaign to do away with that.” Susie Tompkins Buell is a longtime friend of Mrs. Clinton. She described an occasion over the summer where she and the former secretary of state were visiting in a home in the Hamptons. Ms. Buell cut her foot and Mrs. Clinton quickly began rummaging through a medicine cabinet looking for a Band-Aid, refusing to give up the search even after Ms. Buell told her it wasn’t necessary. There’s nothing remarkable about the story. It’s what people do for each other. It stands out only because it’s so seldom one hears anything about Mrs. Clinton that isn’t tethered to the world of policy and politics. There’s no question there’s a flesh-and-blood person lurking beneath the earnest policy wonk who on Saturday at a panel discussion in Little Rock, Ark., celebrated the value of “data” and spoke of the need for an “evidence-based” discussion of the economy. Last week, the University of Virginia made public a series of interviews conducted as part of a Clinton administration history project. Many of the former Clinton-era officials spoke candidly about Mrs. Clinton, who as first lady exerted huge influence in her husband’s administration. Some of the depictions showed admiration; others did not. Yet the interviews leave the reader with a richer understanding of Mrs. Clinton than is possible to glean from her past campaigns. Roger Altman, a former Treasury official, said Mrs. Clinton inspired more staff loyalty than her husband commanded and doesn’t “look at the world solely and only politically.” Leon Panetta, a former chief of staff in the Clinton White House, told of how a staff member came out of one meeting with Mrs. Clinton looking shaken up. “What’s the matter?” Mr. Panetta asked. “The first lady just tore everybody a new ass—-,” the aide replied. Shaping Mrs. Clinton’s image was a running project in the Clinton White House. A cache of nearly 4,000 papers released in March by the Clinton Presidential Library shows the significant thought aides gave to making Mrs. Clinton appealing to the public. And when she started on her U.S. Senate race in 1999, an aide warned that the media would test her. Be chatty, she was counseled, and “don’t be defensive.” Mrs. Clinton likely will run one last campaign. Will voters see a more accessible face than she has typically been willing to show? *Talking Points Memo: “Why Hillary 2016 Thinks She Can Expand Obama's Electoral Map” <http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/hillary-clinton-2016-map?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+(TPMNews)>* By Dylan Scott November 17, 2014, 6:00 a.m. EST The top minds in the proto-Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign infrastructure are already gaming out Electoral College scenarios. What they think they have is a candidate who could compete in a handful of traditionally red states, putting Republicans on the defensive and increasing her chances of winning the White House. Mitch Stewart, Obama's 2012 battleground state director who is now an independent consultant advising the grassroots group Ready for Hillary, laid out the electoral math to TPM in a recent interview. Clinton will start with Obama's map, he said, and can build from there. There are two buckets of states potentially in play. Arkansas, Indiana and Missouri comprise one bucket. The first is a somewhat unique case, given Clinton's history there, while the other two were razor-thin in 2008, but the principle is the same: Clinton has a record of appealing to white working-class voters -- especially women -- and they could be enough when paired with the Obama coalition to pull out a win. "Where I think Secretary Clinton has more appeal than any other Democrat looking at running is that with white working-class voters, she does have a connection," Stewart said. "I think she's best positioned to open those states." Stewart pointed to Clinton's sizable 2008 primary wins in Pennsylvania and Ohio, along with the enthusiastic support for her from former Indiana governor and senator Evan Byah, as evidence of her potential competitiveness with that population and therefore in those states. Those white working-class voters in those states could be "the difference between winning and losing, assuming that we maximize turnout, we maximize voter registration in St. Louis, Indianapolis and northwest Indiana," he said. "Assuming we do all those things, the fact that would push her over the top is her appeal to white working-class voters." The second bucket consists of Arizona and Georgia, two states that Democrats believe are demographically trending toward them, a process that could accelerate with the voter turnout that usually occurs in presidential elections. As Stewart put it, they are "structurally on the precipice of becoming purple states and a presidential campaign can be the catalyzing factor to move those states forward." Georgia combines an increasing African-American electorate, Clinton's appeal to the white working class and northern voters who are moving into the state. Stewart compared the trend to North Carolina, now an established battleground. Arizona can turn blue, Democrats believe, if they mobilize the growing Hispanic population. None of these states are likely to be the key 270th electoral vote, Stewart emphasized. The electoral tipping point is still likely to be the traditional battleground states: Iowa, New Hampshire, Virginia, Ohio, Colorado and Nevada. But if Democrats can make these other states competitive, it gives them more room for error and forces Republicans to expend resources in places that have traditionally been marked down as wins for them before the campaign even starts. "If Republicans have to spend resources in Arizona and George to make sure that they win it, that means that they're spending less resources elsewhere," Stewart said. "The further we can play into their field, the more money they're going to have to spend playing defense in places they've normally taken for granted." Stewart's outlook is a common one in the Hillary 2016 universe. The New York Times' Amy Chozick reported earlier this month that Clinton supporters have a term for it -- the "New Clinton Map," which combines white working-class women with the Obama coalition to expand the electoral playing field. Other top Democratic strategists, not as immediately involved in Clintonland, agree that they might be onto something. "I think Hillary Clinton can be a temporary salve to Democrats' fading chances with white voters, primarily because she will attract women," Carter Eskew, a top adviser to Al Gore's 2000 campaign, told TPM. "If she supplements her gender appeal with a real contrast on the economy, then all the better." That will be key, Stewart agreed. Clinton has already been testing a 2016 message that heavily emphasizes wage growth and expanding the middle class. That's how she'll attract those voters that could bring these additional states into reach. "For whatever reason, Democrats have not been able to articulate a message that resonates even though our economic values align with that working-class family's economic values," Stewart said. "It's something that we have to figure out." It is not a universally shared opinion, however. Mother Jones's Kevin Drum outlined why Democratic struggles with the white working class have become so ingrained in recent years. Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics, sounded skeptical when asked by TPM about Clinton's ability to break through with that population. "It’s possible, but I’ll believe it when I see it," he said in an email. "The hardening of party lines during the Bush and Obama years make switches more difficult unless they are propelled purely by demographic shifts." Others within the Democratic Party cautioned, though, that no matter who the 2016 nominee is, working-class whites shouldn't be viewed as an electoral elixir. The base Obama coalition is still the foundation for national wins. "As you put together the coalition, it still is an important part. What's important is that a Democrat gets a certain respectable showing there," Kenneth Baer, a former Obama administration official and founder of Democracy: A Journal Of Ideas, told TPM. "It is necessary to win a part of the white working-class vote, but it is not sufficient by any means to win a presidential election as a Democrat. And so you really, really need to perform strongly in those other categories as well." *San Francisco Chronicle: “New political generation on hold as elder Democrats hang on” <http://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/New-political-generation-on-hold-as-elder-5897425.php#/0>* By Carla Marinucci November 16, 2014, 7:52 p.m. EST When Rep. Mike Honda celebrated his hard-fought re-election win in Silicon Valley over fellow Democrat Ro Khanna, his victory speech crystallized one of his party’s biggest challenges in California as it looks toward the future. “There’s no reason to retire,” the 73-year-old Honda exulted when his narrow victory over Khanna, 38, was assured. “I’m going to live until 103. ... I’m not going anywhere.” While Honda’s grit and enthusiasm is a boon to his progressive and labor backers, his stated determination to hang on to his House seat for years to come underscores the fears of some Democrats that they head into the 2016 elections in danger of losing ground to Republicans with critical Millennial voters. Some political observers suggest that a “gerontocracy” dilemma looms for Democrats, who fired up millions of young voters with a fresh face named Barack Obama in 2008, but who now face the dominance of the party’s older officeholders and the difficulty of its younger generation in moving up the ladder. In what he called a post-election “wake-up call,” Simon Rosenberg, who heads NDN, a Democratic think tank in Washington, warned his party last week that the Democratic National Committee must take the lead in “recruiting and training a new generation of candidates and operatives needed to beat a new generation of Republicans.” *'Children of Reagan’* “Part of what we are witnessing is the coming to power of the children of Reagan — fortysomething Gen Xers who came of age during the Reagan era,” Rosenberg said. “This generation of politicians is young, gaining in experience, and will be a force to be reckoned with in institutional and state politics for generations to come.” In California, Democratic leadership is dominated by older warriors — from Gov. Jerry Brown, 76, to state party Chairman John Burton and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, both 81, to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Barbara Boxer, both 74. Most members of the Bay Area’s House delegation — all of them Democrats — are in their 60s and 70s. The lone exceptions are Reps. Jared Huffman of San Rafael, 50, and Eric Swalwell, 33, of Dublin — who, like Khanna, bucked the Democratic Party establishment and the White House when he took on a long-term incumbent. Unlike Khanna, Swalwell won his race, defeating 20-term Rep. Pete Stark in 2012. A recent USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll showed that although Boxer and Feinstein are still popular with voters, nearly 60 percent of respondents said they wanted fresh faces to take their jobs. *Patience running out* With Republicans about to seize control of the U.S. Senate and speculation growing that Boxer won’t run for re-election in 2016, the political gossip mill is churning about the patience — or lack thereof — of younger Democrats who have been biding their time for several years. “I don’t think talent is going to wait,” said Republican strategist Rob Stutzman, citing a Democratic bench that includes Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, Attorney General Kamala Harris, Controller John Chiang and a host of House members. If Boxer “doesn’t retire, I don’t know why she wouldn’t be challenged from within her party,” Stutzman said. “And it will almost certainly happen to Feinstein,” who will be 85 when she comes up for re-election in 2018, he said. Even on the national stage, the Democratic leadership has a distinctly gray tinge. The party’s leading presidential hopeful is Hillary Rodham Clinton, 67, in contrast to a Republican field that could include Sens. Rand Paul, 51, and Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, both 43. “Wisdom comes from experience — but a lot of these people have a little too much,” said political commentator Patrick Dorinson. “When you’ve been in power a little too long, with little opposition, you get entrenched. And the more they do that, the more they allow the Republicans to develop the new talent.” GOP consultant Kevin Spillane says Democrats hoping to attract Millennials “will have to change, or Republicans are going to win.” *Key East Bay race* He points to new faces like Catharine Baker of Pleasanton, 42, an attorney and mother of two school-age children. The moderate Republican won her East Bay Assembly race despite a well-funded challenge from Democrat Tim Sbranti, who had the backing of the California Teachers Association and Democratic establishment figures including Brown. Baker, the first Republican to win election to state office from the Bay Area since 2006, said her victory was the product of an effort by state GOP leaders to cultivate younger candidates at every level. She stressed education and jobs, not social issues. Her appeal to crossover and younger voters came because “I was an outsider, not an elected official,” she said. Being pitted against big unions, a prime source of Democratic campaign funding, helped rather than hurt her in the suburban district that stretches from Livermore to Orinda, Baker said. “That’s another big component in change,” she said. “I had a lot of people tell me I was the first Republican they’ve ever voted for.” Republicans also fielded a crowd of fortysomething candidates for statewide office in the general election. GOP officials acknowledge it could take another election cycle — or more — to overcome the Democrats’ 15-point voter registration advantage. But in this election, Fresno Mayor Ashley Swearengin, who ran for controller, and secretary of state candidate Pete Peterson both won endorsements from major newspapers and gained a platform for future runs. Younger Republicans such as Swearengin, Baker and Neel Kashkari, the party’s 41-year-old candidate in the gubernatorial election, have one advantage their junior Democratic counterparts lack — the GOP has been out of power so long, there’s no old guard to block the way up. Former San Leandro Mayor Anthony Santos, who ran for re-election in 2010 at 78 — and lost — says he advises his fellow Democrats not to stay too long in the job. “There are too many Democrats who are well over 70 and have no idea what it is like to be young — and what the younger people are thinking and what their needs are,” Santos said. *Excellent example* Democratic observers said the House race between Honda and Khanna was a prime example of the party’s dilemma. Honda has the advantages in Washington of seniority and seven terms of experience, which he said helped in securing such benefits for his district as funding to extend BART toward San Jose. Khanna, however, would have attracted rising-star buzz on Capitol Hill, as an Indian American and favorite of the tech crowd — no small consideration for a party reliant on Silicon Valley fundraising. Honda did nothing to endear himself to those donors — or the valley’s young tech innovators — in his victory speech when he said the election “could not be bought” by “millionaires and billionaires.” With few incumbents to protect, Republicans are concentrating on rebuilding the party through programs such as Trailblazers, which targets promising young GOP candidates, and GROW Elect, which encourages Latino Republican up-and-comers at the local level, said party strategist Aaron McLear. *Republican diversity* In the state Legislature, still overwhelmingly Democratic, Assembly GOP leader Kristin Olsen of Modesto noted that there will be more women among Republicans than Democrats in the next session. Among the GOP newcomers are three Asian American women from Orange County — Ling-Ling Chang and Young Kim, who won Assembly races, and Janet Nguyen, a former refugee from Vietnam who won her state Senate race in a landslide. Political consultant Rich Schlackman said Democrats have their own rising stars, pointing to Newsom, Harris, Secretary of State-elect Alex Padilla and Treasurer-elect Betty Yee. And at the local level, Oakland Mayor-elect Libby Schaaf could be someone to watch, Democratic observers suggest. Even Khanna may be heard from again, if he can find a clear path, they say. Larry Gerston, a political science professor at San Jose State University, said the next few years will be a turning point for the Democratic Party in California — with the very real possibility that the “big three” of Brown, Feinstein and Boxer will leave office by 2018. Then, he said, “you’ll see a flurry of people trying to move up.” *National Journal: “Obama's Immigration Order Has 2016 Perils for Both Parties” <http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/obama-s-immigration-order-has-2016-perils-for-both-parties-20141116>* By Alex Roarty November 16, 2014 It didn't take long for the 2016 election to reach its first major crossroads. As early as this week, President Obama is expected to ignore the wishes of congressional Republicans and announce that he will unilaterally defer deportations for millions of undocumented immigrants. When he does, Republicans and Democrats alike should worry he just made life harder for their next presidential nominees. Few decisions, even from the president, influence elections more than 23 months away, but Obama's immigration maneuver accomplishes the rare feat of exposing both parties to what should be their biggest cause for concern in the 2016 election. At stake for Democrats is whether Obama's decision to take executive action prevents him from a broad political rehabilitation during the last two years of his presidency. If Obama fails to achieve a small recovery, even a well-known and relatively popular politician like Hillary Clinton will struggle to convince voters they shouldn't back the other party's choice for the White House—a situation not unlike the one that befell John McCain's campaign to replace George W. Bush in 2008. But to the White House, the chance to reengage and reenergize the immigrant-heavy Latino community ahead of 2016 plainly outweighs the risk that doing so will alienate the broader electorate. And therein lies the danger for Republicans, whose leaders two years ago stated emphatically that the party needed to grow its appeal among Hispanic voters if it wanted to succeed in national elections. Broadly speaking, the executive order might be politically complicated, but within the Latino community, it is a guaranteed winner. Democrats could use a winner with Hispanic voters after the 2014 election and the administration's failure, at least until the president's executive order, to stop the deportations of many members of their community. The party won 62 percent of the Latino vote in 2014, according to exit polls, but some immigration advocates say the energy and passion many of them showed for Obama's party—especially in 2012 after he ordered a stop to deportations for the children of illegal immigrations—was missing this election. They cite Sen. Mark Udall's defeat in Colorado, one of the few states in play in 2014 with a large Hispanic vote, as evidence of what happens to Democrats when they don't advocate for immigration reform. It's something that would happen to the party's next presidential candidate, said Frank Shary, executive director of America's Voice. "If the president's record ended up being little more than 2 million deportations and a lot of unkept promises, it's not so much that it would drive a lot of Latinos into the hands of Republicans, it would probably lead to a lot of them to stay home on Election Day," he said. Complicating matters on the Republican side is the party's prospective presidential candidates, most of whom are positioning themselves to draw conservative support ahead of a competitive primary. Their reaction will receive disproportionate attention, and the eventual GOP nominee will have trouble repositioning an immigration agenda for the general election. It could be a repeat of what happened in 2012 to Mitt Romney, whose call during primary season for undocumented immigrants to "self-deport" helped Obama win Hispanic voters by a better than 2-to-1 ratio. Even if Republicans avoid the harsh rhetoric that has marked the previous responses to immigration policy—something Republican strategists acknowledge is no guarantee—their explanation that their objections are based on overuse of executive power might not resonate with the Hispanic community. "That won't matter," said one immigration policy strategist who works with both parties. "If they start filing lawsuits, making noise about impeaching the president over this, Republicans will have completely lost Latino and Asian voters. It will be seen not as a direct attack on president, but a direct attack on the community." Whether the support Obama gains from Hispanics is enough to overcome the potential broader damage to his popularity remains to be seen. As Obama explained in his post-election press conference, voters are upset with Washington gridlock and dysfunction—two things he vowed to work to correct in his last two years in office. Republicans have warned the president that any executive action, coming just weeks after his party's Election Day drubbing, will poison the well with Congress for the new session and make any new legislative deal-making much more difficult. "It looks like a revenge move," said Ron Bonjean, a former top GOP congressional aide. "He's poking a stick in their eye.… Using his authority in that way shows he doesn't want to work with Congress. It further strengthens the Republican argument [that] if legislation lands on his doorstep, all he wants to do is … pretend he's a dictator. He doesn't want to work with Congress." Even Republicans who have argued for the necessity of the party broadening its appeal with racial minorities are now saying that, in this case, the president's own move will backfire. "There's always a danger for undisciplined politicians to overreact, and their overreaction always backfires," said Whit Ayres, a GOP pollster and frequent critic of the party's immigration policy. "But if Republican elected officials watch their tone and don't overreact, this move contemplated by the president will backfire." *Politico: “Obama makes legacy play on trade” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/barack-obama-trade-legacy-112939.html>* By Josh Gerstein November 16, 2014, 12:55 p.m. EST BRISBANE, Australia — After years of populist rhetoric against banks and Wall Street, repeated calls for raising the minimum wage and withering campaign-trail criticism of corporate America for shipping jobs overseas and dodging taxes, President Barack Obama could leave office with a foreign policy legacy whose most concrete achievement is a huge free trade deal with Pacific Rim countries. On a trip through Asia and Australia over the past week, Obama and his aides have been pushing hard to finalize the Trans-Pacific Partnership, pressing foreign leaders from 11 countries to hash out their differences and get the pact done in the coming months. The trade deal would deliver a tangible achievement that a GOP-controlled Senate is highly likely to endorse and demonstrate that Obama has the diplomatic chops to pull off a complex, multilateral deal akin to playing three-dimensional chess. But his history of bashing prior trade pacts also sets him up for renewed trouble with a political base frustrated with him after heavy election losses and a faltering agenda. Their ire could also hit presumptive Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who economic policies are already under attack from liberals and whose tenure at the State Department coincided with the TPP negotiations. U.S. officials said they were surprised at how forcefully Obama pressed the free-trade message both in public and private during summit meetings in Beijing on Monday and Tuesday. And his sustained focus on the issue was refreshing after numerous other international meetings have been sidetracked by various crises, the American officials said. To some degree, Obama’s new emphasis on trade may be making a virtue out of necessity, since few other major accomplishments seem to be looming on the foreign policy front and his efforts to improve ties with Russia, broker an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal and oversee a peaceful withdrawal from Iraq have all foundered. “This has the potential for being a historic achievement,” Obama said at a meeting of TPP leaders in Beijing, making clear that completing the pact would be a big legacy item. “What we are seeing is momentum building around a Trans-Pacific Partnership that can spur greater economic growth, spur greater jobs growth, set high standards for trade and investment throughout the Asia Pacific.” These words stand in contrast to some of the rhetoric he once used to criticize trade deals like the North American Free Trade Agreement. During the 2008 campaign, Obama painted deals like NAFTA as job-killers in America. “I think it has been devastating, because our trade agreements did not have labor standards and environmental standards that would assure that workers in the U.S. were getting a square deal,” he said during a January 2008 debate. Even though Obama’s views on trade pacts seem to have warmed since then, his political brand has never been identified with free trade the way Republicans’ or even President Bill Clinton’s have been. From the time Bill Clinton arrived on the national political scene, he made a point of departing from the protectionist orthodoxy of labor unions and the Democratic Party. Obama, by contrast, came to prominence criticizing free trade, not embracing it. “It’ll be a great irony if his main foreign policy success is a trade deal,” said the Hoover Institution’s Kori Schake, foreign policy adviser to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) during the 2008 presidential campaign. Now Obama has to convince the very workers whose fate he decried that the TPP is in their interest. A senior administration official traveling with Obama said the president believes he can successfully make the case that well-negotiated free-trade deals can be good for this constituency. The official pointed to a trip Obama took to Detroit in 2011 with South Korean President Lee Myung-Bak. Autoworkers cheered the pair because the trade deal they cut was seen as promoting jobs on both sides of the Pacific, the official noted. U.S. officials also say key beneficiaries of a trade deal will be small- and medium-size businesses and software makers, not simply big multinational corporations. Yet there are ways in which pushing for a TPP deal is politically convenient. With a Republican takeover of the Senate looming as a result of the trouncing Democrats took in the midterm elections, Obama is casting about for areas where he and the GOP can work together. Trade is one of the highest-profile areas of possible bipartisan cooperation, something Obama says voters are demanding. Republicans are “interested in promoting trade that will create jobs and opportunity for U.S. workers and U.S. businesses,” Obama said Friday during a news conference in Burma, adding that he’s “all over it.” “We believe in open markets and trade that is fair and free — a level playing field where economies play by the same rules,” the president declared Saturday in a speech in Australia. Obama aides insist that his support for new trade deals being hashed out with Asia and Europe is not inconsistent with the sharp criticism he offered of NAFTA. The president argued Saturday that the Asia deal would be a “high-standards” agreement that makes it hard for countries to undercut each other by damaging the environment or having lax labor or safety rules. “We are pushing new standards in this trade agreement, requiring countries that participate to protect their workers better and to protect the environment better, and protect intellectual property that unleashes innovation, and baseline standards to ensure transparency and rule of law,” the president said. While Obama and his team see distinctions, critics see more of the same. While the GOP may get on board with an Asian trade deal, many members of Obama’s own party are skeptical or downright hostile to the idea. “Our country has already lost more than 5 million manufacturing jobs since NAFTA and the World Trade Organization went into effect,” Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said. “What does TPP do? It further exacerbates the economically unsustainable trajectory of our society.” She concluded, “We should not blindly enorse any more NAFTA-style deals.” Some administration officials are clearly frustrated with those who focus on Obama’s past criticism of trade deals rather than his current enthusiasm for them. “From the start of this administration, we have made clear that we need to understand the history of trade policy and learn the lessons of that history,” U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said earlier this year. “However, some of the criticisms I hear of our agenda don’t seem to recognize that this is 2014, not 1994.” Of course, some critics say Obama’s populist tone on trade deals, corporate America and Wall Street has always been mainly rhetorical. They note how he gave top jobs to Clinton Administration officials who were architects of many of the free trade and financial deregulation policies he criticized. Many on the left also argue that efforts to punish those responsible for the 2008 financial meltdown have been notably lackluster. A race to the finish line on TPP in the coming months could also be tricky for Hillary Clinton, who’s seeking to court many of those same critics as she prepares a potential bid for the White House. She’s identified with her husband’s penchant for free trade deals and could find it difficult to distance herself from agreements that were being negotiated during much of her tenure in Obama’s Cabinet. Some Democratic lawmakers and labor unions are already pressing her to take a more skeptical tack on trade, opposing deals that could make it easier for companies in low-wage countries like Vietnam to compete with firms which depend on American workers. It’s also possible the TPP deal will never get done, or at least not on Obama’s watch. Administration officials say they’re increasingly confident that it will be completed. Some experts close to the administration believe the deal could be wrapped up within six months. However, timelines for completing the deal have repeatedly slipped. In June, Obama suggested that the agreement could be ready to be unveiled during his current trip to Asia. But a few weeks ago, administration officials began lowering expectations by declaring that the negotiations would not be finished in time for the president to announce an agreement while abroad. “I’m skeptical … that he’ll be able to get TPP if he didn’t deliver it on the Asia trip,” Schake said. “The complaint I’m hearing from the Japanese and others is that they don’t think the president is actually interested enough to put political heft behind the negotiations.” The TPP is also a central part of the so-called pivot to Asia — the president’s best known strategic shift in U.S. foreign policy — and therefore critical to Obama’s legacy. Like other aspects of the pivot, now termed a “rebalance,” the TPP puts China in an awkward spot and reaffirms U.S. leadership in the region. Publicly, Chinese leaders said they welcome trade deals like the TPP pact under discussion and are working on a related proposal for a regional free-trade area that would include China as well. Privately, Chinese officials are nervous about the TPP. In fact, the meeting of leaders of TPP countries in Beijing was staged at the U.S. Embassy — a strange venue for such a gathering — in part because China made it difficult to assemble the group anywhere else. At the session, Obama was adamant that the TPP would be a major accomplishment, and one he was committed to pressing forward on despite the difficulties. “To ensure that TPP is a success, we also have to make sure that all of our people back home understand the benefits for them — that it means more trade, more good jobs, and higher incomes for people throughout the region, including the United States,” Obama said. “That’s the case that I’ll continue to make to Congress and the American people.” *New York Post: “NY GOP Chair: de Blasio will take 2016 nomination over Hillary” <http://nypost.com/2014/11/17/gop-chairman-de-blasio-will-take-nomination-over-hillary-in-2016/>* By Fredric U. Dicker November 17, 2014, 2:07 a.m. EST Mayor de Blasio — not Hillary Rodham Clinton — will be the Democratic nominee for president in 2016. That’s the jaw-dropping prediction being made by New York’s top Republican, state GOP Chairman Ed Cox, who, as son-in-law to former President Richard Nixon, knows a thing or two about national politics. Cox, citing information provided by a prominent “Democratic lobbyist,’’ told friends and associates in recent days that freshman Mayor de Blasio’s effort to promote himself as the leader of the “urban progressive centers of the nation’’ is part of a well-oiled plan to prepare for a presidential run. “It’s like Barack Obama; he was a brand-new freshman senator, and he ran for president and won. I think de Blasio is going to do it,’’ Cox said at a recent gathering, a source told The Post. Cox also cited de Blasio’s remarkably close but dicey ties to the controversial, and racially divisive, Rev. Al Sharpton, an Obama friend and one-time Democratic presidential hopeful who has a vast national political network, as evidence that the mayor sees his political future as somewhere beyond New York City, the source said. “Cox has been pointing out that Sharpton is back and forth to the White House and serves as an emissary for de Blasio,’’ said the source, who pointed out that former top Sharpton aide Rachel Noerdlinger continues to serve as chief of staff to de Blasio’s wife, even as Noerdlinger has become a political liability. Cox also found backing for his prediction last week in a provocative Huffington Post column in which the mayor — sounding like a national spokesman for left-of-center “progressive’’ Democrats — blamed the sweeping Republican election victories earlier this month on the failure of Democrats to be progressive enough. “This year, too many Democratic candidates lost sight of those core principles — opting instead to clip their progressive wings in deference to a conventional wisdom that says bold ideas aren’t politically practical,’’ de Blasio wrote. Cox told associates that the “small blue dots’’ on the national electoral map containing the nation’s biggest cities will dominate the 2016 Democratic primary and that de Blasio, “the leader of the urban Democratic Party who holds the second-most important job in America,’’ would strongly appeal to voters there. As for Clinton, Cox, a Manhattan lawyer whose life has been steeped in politics ever since he married then-President Nixon’s daughter in 1971, contends the former secretary of state is out of step with party progressives and doesn’t have the political skills of her husband. “The national Democratic Party is going hard left. It’s Obama’s party, and that’s why [freshman Mass. Sen.] Elizabeth Warren gets them excited,’’ Cox said recently. “But Hillary voted for the Iraq war and then doubled-down by saying we should have gotten more involved in Syria and talked about businesses not creating jobs. She’s trying to ride in as a moderate when the party’s gone hard left,’’ he continued. Cox wouldn’t directly respond to questions about his remarks, but he told The Post, “De Blasio is a man with huge national ambitions, and for those ambitions, New York City is just a stepping stone. Meanwhile, some Democrats are yelling “hypocrite’’ at de Blasio over his Huffington Post essay. The Democratic critics charge that de Blasio didn’t exactly stick to his “core principles’’ with his own endorsement of Gov. Cuomo, who has been widely criticized by party “progressives’’ for failing to support state Senate Democrats. “People thought it was incredibly hypocritical for the mayor to go around lecturing progressive Democrats across the country in the Huffington Post about how they need to have a backbone, when he bent over backwards to help people like Cuomo,’’ said a prominent Democratic activist with ties to de Blasio. *Calendar:* *Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official schedule.* · November 19 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton is honored by the National Breast Cancer Coalition (Breast Cancer Deadline <http://www.breastcancerdeadline2020.org/donate/fundraising-events/2014-NY-Gala-Evite.html> ) · November 21 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton presides over meeting of the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves (Bloomberg <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-02/clinton-aides-resist-calls-to-jump-early-into-2016-race> ) · November 21 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton is honored by the New York Historical Society (Bloomberg <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-02/clinton-aides-resist-calls-to-jump-early-into-2016-race> ) · December 1 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton keynotes a League of Conservation Voters dinner (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-green-groups-las-vegas-111430.html?hp=l11> ) · December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>) · December 16 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton honored by Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/hillary-clinton-ripple-of-hope-award-112478.html> )