podesta-emails

podesta_email_20638.txt

podesta-emails 1,931 words email
P22 P17 V11 V16 D6
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- I wish I had saved my emails from the 1999-2000 Gore v.Bradley campaign, because I could save everyone a lot of time by circulating them and they would largely be identical, and include many of the EXACT SAME points from Stan Greenberg -- EXACT SAME. It was the EXACT same issue: Could Gore be the change candidate? Should he build on the Clinton record? Lots of Dems loved Bill Bradley's change message -- could Gore ever beat Bradley at the change game? Should he even try? That said, one thing comes through this all that I agree with: We need to invest more time in describing what HRC wants to do for America, if she becomes President. Forget the symbolic choice between "build on" and "change" -- what is it that she wants to do as President? How would America be different? What should people be excited about? I think that is where our bread, meat and cheese are thin. People can draw their own conclusion about whether such a vision would be continuity or change -- that's just a label. What we need to deliver is a more compelling message on America under HRC. -----Original Message----- From: Jake Sullivan <[email protected]> To: Dan Schwerin <[email protected]>; John Podesta <[email protected]> Cc: Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]>; Ron Klain <[email protected]>; Karen Dunn <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Jan 27, 2016 12:19 pm Subject: RE: Evolving the core message I would posit, based on his observations, that if our case for how change happens is the meat of the sandwich, we need thicker bread. The top piece of outrage about the current state of affairs has to be thicker, and the bottom piece about her bold agenda for what we’re going to do about it has to be thicker. How’s that for an overwrought analogy? From: Dan Schwerin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:15 PM To: John Podesta <[email protected]> Cc: Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]>; Jake Sullivan <[email protected]>; Ron Klain <[email protected]>; Karen Dunn <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Evolving the core message This is both helpful and a little frustrating. I'm curious whether his point about Obama holds true with the African American voters we're going to be appealing to in the next few weeks. But the broader point seems well taken. I'm playing with an idea for Monday night's speech that might help modestly: I think she should speak directly to the thousands of grassroots voters, especially young people, who are bringing new energy and urgency to this race and forcing all of us to grapple with deep injustices and imbalances in our country (the deck is stacked, etc). She should say that she hears them, shares their concerns, and is glad they're reshaping our national debate. We all agree on the problem that needs to be solved. Now the question is how to actually do something about it. And then launch into our contrasting theories of change and her belief that ideas can't just sound good on paper, they have to really make a difference in people's lives. The idea here is 1) make it clear that the protest vote has been heard, giving permission to Democrats in later states to move on; 2) provide a pivot point to more authentically embrace a shared diagnosis; 3) disaggregate Bernie's voters from Bernie himself, so the former feel like they can keep shaping the party even after the latter rides off into the sunset. None of this changes the basic problem that compared to Bernie we're never going to be the "change candidate" and so we're either confident in our own identity or we're chasing him and offering ourselves as a pale imitation. I think we're on to something good with our new message that change is about pushing hard, getting knocked down, etc, because it puts her best attributes in service of progressive ends. But that's still process and incrementalism. On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:46 AM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote: Sending just to the internal crew. His dissection of our message is worth paying attention to. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Stan Greenberg <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 Subject: Evolving the core message To: John Podesta <[email protected]> Cc: Stan Greenberg <[email protected]> John, Let me follow-up your suggestion that I read the transcript of what Hillary is actually saying. Here, I’m focusing on the Iowa town hall transcript, and happy to respond to the one you are sending. For now, I am convinced you are badly positioned, though I now believe you can readily transition to an evolved core message. I told you I thought she did great, but that was stylistically, presidentially and on foreign threats. She had energy, sounded like somebody you could trust as president and looked good. She was the one who talked about the new diversity of the country and our new values. It may be enough to win Iowa. But I think the overall message is tone death on what is happening in the country and even more, in the Democratic primary electorate. As a result, she has left the change voters to Sanders. She addresses change as biography: so you are making the vote choice about her, rather than what is happening in the country. At least in this town hall, Sanders was the only one talking about change, the country and the future. There is a pretty easy way to transition your message, and it could drive votes to you pretty quickly. I believe it is plausible. What is your core message? So, consider me a focus group of one and my take away from the town hall. Knowing your core message is the starting point to evolving it. First, you are running on continuity with Obama. Hillary said, we need to “build on the progress that we’ve made.” President Obama achieved great things and the great risk is “the Republicans rip away the progress and turn us backwards.” “We need to build on it, and go further.” Obama abandoned this message in his own re-elections, but you are on it. This is tone death, at best. You begin with a contested idea, even among Democrats and people who rate Obama highly. And it sears in the idea that you are incremental change, while conceding change to Sanders and the Republicans. That will make your race much harder. Which voters could you possibly be talking to? Fully 55 percent of the Rising American Electorate and three quarters of white working class women says we are on the wrong track in both WVWV and Roosevelt surveys. This is a mad starting point. In focus groups we just conducted for Roosevelt last week with African American millennials, participants could not have been more despairing: “It’s disappointing. I just think our country could do a lot better … It’s going to take a real long time to fix the mess. For real.” They describe their experience with the economy: “sad and crappy”; “I’m very disgusted”; “I’m gong to say uneasy. And just disappointed.” Second, you are running on being ready for the job in very insecure times. The primaries and caucuses are a way to vet the candidates, and you can see Hillary is ready. That is what Hillary said in the town hall and what the president focused on. I can’t tell you how many leaders I supported who want to run on experience and building on the progress, including David Miliband, and watched them defeated by the change candidate who get all the energy. Voters in both the primary and general election will be figuring out how to vote for change – and you have given Sanders a big opening. Third, governing is messy and not very pretty. And Hillary knows the idealism and promises of other candidates won’t happen. Hillary knows how to make progress. “I just keep going forward … and I’m still standing.” You sound like a grown-up lecturing these young people on don’t expect too much from all this idealism. And fourth, Hillary has spent a lifetime fighting for change and “going after inequality.” That is who she is. “I’ve taken on the status quo time and time again.” You can trust me to bring change because she battled for it, starting with kids and health care. She’s fought “racial inequality, sexist inequality, homophobic inequality.” Also, economic inequality, but mainly to remind people that Bill Clinton is the only president to produce greater equality. I found that answer attractive but it does not change your core framework, though critically, it provides a ready platform to evolve it. But for now, your core message is about the past. It is about Clinton’s character and qualities as a leader. The message is not economic, and it is not about the country. * * * * * But as we discussed, Hillary can be the candidate who can bring the change, and your discussion of biography in town halls allows you to make the transition. But you have to start by saying, “Look, all of us Democratic candidates share this critique and anger with what is happening in the country. The difference is I have a powerful personal history of fighting inequality and bringing change. And here is are the bold changes I will work to bring.” That transition takes you to what is happening in the country, it makes her bio relevant, and enables her to talk about the bold changes she wants to bring. [This is explicitly, not just finishing what Obama did or defending his progress.” My starting point is the remarkable and intense level of support for the level the playing the field message. In our most recent test for Roosevelt, we showed that bringing in trade issues in particular strengthens the message further. The reason Sanders is getting so much traction and energy is that he is articulating this message. Yes, his personal conviction is important, but what makes it work is what he is saying about the country and the ability to bring change. He is talking unapologetically about the excess at the top and the need to grow the middle class and America. I also now believe that Sanders is being helped by his use of the trade issue. Your running on “building on the progress” allows him a contrast that hurts you in the primary and general. But from the beginning, Hillary and her campaign, you affirmed in our meetings, really accepted this core economic message, even if Hillary took the edge off in delivery. Progressive Democrats were pretty united. That is key to my recommendation here. Hillary should say how united are Democrats on this core critique of the country and what needs to happen to change the rules so the country grows the middle class again. The core difference is that Hillary has a history of fighting inequality and bringing change. Sanders does not. That is why she is excited to talk about this bold agenda that will bring change. Hope this makes sense and helps. Happy to talk further. Stan
👁 1 💬 0
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
21d92ba2a930bb210d26e7db853f90b116502347ea76ad08a07065ebb8f8d3bb
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!