EFTA01031963.pdf

From: Martin Weinberg To: J <[email protected]> Cc: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL and ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 15:56:54 +0000 we drop him in middle of signatories he is in their editorial so his absence as a co-signatory is noticeable but your instinct may be right to omit Lilly? good to have female. I think we pick a time for roy, lilly and send to Editors. Then followup to push for publication.I have asked Ken to get us a contact. alan too. no reply to those requests. I have not sent to Lilly thinking you wanted to but can, let me know Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 - Office - Cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Sat, 3/2/19, J <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL and ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE To: "Martin Weinberg" cMINIM> Date: Saturday, March 2, 2019, 10:51 AM the point was that you write that academics were accused doesnt alan s byline , become the focal? On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 10:44 AM Martin Weinberg wrote: I don't think it necessary The longer this is, the more likely for editing Ken thinks Alan should co-sign. OK with you? Without a name, I think we send to the Letters to the Editor eg by noon and then have followup to make sure its received, EFTA01031963 published Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 - Office - Cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Sat, 3/2/19, J <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL and ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE To: "Martin Weinberg" Date: Saturday, March 2, 2019, 10:41 AM do we mention that we are also writing to sasse .? On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 10:35 AM Martin Weinberg wrote: thanks, most included in EFTA01031964 latest draft Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 - Office - Cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. EFTA01031965  ---------------- On Sat, 3/2/19, Darren Indyke wrote: Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL and ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE To: "Martin Weinberg" Cc: "Darren Indyke" "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]>, "Ken Starr" ca, "Kathy Ruemmler" <M le> Date: Saturday, March 2, 2019, 10:26 AM Quick suggestions marked on the attached. EFTA01031966 DARREN K. INDYKE 5300 W. Atlantic Avenue, Suite 602 Delray Beach, Florida 33484 Telephone: Telecopier: Mobile: EFTA01031967 email: ************** *************************************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Darren K. Indyke. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you EFTA01031968 have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. Copyright of Darren K. Indyke - C 2019 Darren K. Indyke - All rights reserved. On EFTA01031969 Mar 2, 2019, at 9:40 AM, Kathy Ruemmler wrote: This is great. Highly recommend that we not let perfect be the enemy of the good and get this submitted ASAP while fresh and NYT Ed Board should feel pressure to publish. On Mar 2, 2019, at 9:26 AM, J <[email protected]> wrote: well done EFTA01031970  tin On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 9:22 AM Martin Weinberg wrote: A very quick morning stab at a possible letter to editor.- hopefully to motivate edits, discussion, revisions, I think this route makes far more sense than uninvited Op-Eds. Also consistent with a draft being edited to be sent to Sen Sasse. The NYT Editorial is enraging in its political bias - and is deeply EFTA01031971 damaging. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 - Office EFTA01031972  - Cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. EFTA01031973 On Sat, 3/2/19, J <jeevacation®gmail.com> wrote: Subject: time sensitive To: "Ken Stan" a, "Martin Weinberg" aNIM>, "Alan Dershowitz" EFTA01031974  "Kathy Ruemmler" "Darren Indyke" Date: Saturday, March 2, 2019, 12:42 AM now that the NYT , the paper of record has gotten so many facts and conclusions wrong. I thought a direct response to the editorial board was EFTA01031975 now appropriate. . thoughts on more than one member of the team on the byline?. . starting with the suggestion that 5 professional criminal defense attorney somehow colluded with alex acosta is preposterous. it EFTA01031976  was reviewed by many sets of eyes at DOJ / reference sloman letter.? . the attack on the decision to require Epstein to plead in the state.rather than in fed court . was an outcome dictated by the fact that this was a quintessential EFTA01031977  state case. A florida case of sex for money. The ages of a minority of the women actually under 18 at the time. and the govt contending with the fact that many of them said they had misrepresented their age to epstein and the clubs EFTA01031978  at which they worked. ? . There was never a sex Party- Epstein does not have parties. . he had a science gathering and allegations were made that one of the women was required to have sex with academics world leaders. academics including stephen hawkings.. ? the guest list EFTA01031979  were used to accuse people of sex assault. ). President Clinton was never ever on his island. no proof , neither was al gore.. at some point a newspaper , should take a step back and in its EFTA01031980  desire to craft a story re a trump cabinet member and check its facts. ? etc. thoughts. . please note EFTA01031981  The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly EFTA01031982  prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01031983  please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE EFTA01031984 Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01031985  please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01031986  please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01031987