EFTA01386393.pdf

Kale Johnson v Donald 3 'I'rumparal Jeffrey E Frown Trump Child Rape Chum Tor 5)00 Minton Merged by Trump Arroniey I Gkbat Research • Centre for Research on Globehyshon ADOU: (:::("Z3C1 tier- treinip Stcit Arc,- •• I.'s:. Ca Note see en Fringes !Tonkel:baton(a ;blare, Deosch Portugues sires kesl, GlobalResearch goo to, Otutothrehoo Search Authors... (eobalizacien I Asia .9'yeire Research filobeireSisarcisca / globakeseareleerg Search... GR Newsletter, Enter Email GO 00 US Nato War Economy Civil Rights Environment Poverty Media Justice 9/11 War Crimes Militarization History Science Latest News Et Top Stories Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein: Trump Child Rape Claim for $100 Million Denied by Trump Attorney Al'. Ghee*. Now a (ex:2 dEtat in Italy' By wham Poredman Global Research July 07.2016 Sea Massacre Update 'Decent Hutment." Reader Swooned News 6 arty 2016 Ws BOyCOt Apartheid ;net and AN Its Regan USA Supporters Theme Law and Justice Ireceptn Report, Ll S Erection Local Auloncmy. A Key to Protection of the Ecosystem ne, Philo:Ines Apo isfarttl Ii Star 0 an 3 tt-ctcr.--c-ic; Tra-_:- a Australia's China Sy: Pottle Sinister Maeattir VMS Centime Maiersa s Muayx4ar Cosso Malaysia Debts and the Push ice Revers Trurne'S Trade War wen Chem imagine %Mot Would Happen if China Decreed to Buy Voxxts horn Stria el7mn Here !The allegabors are net only calegonmay false, bun disgusting at Me levee level and clearly framed to soles media attention or. rmre )they, are Wince*/ motivated To be clear there * abeedely no merit tomes& clams and based on au investgation, no evidence trat tee person who has made these alligators actually crests' - Alan Garton. corporate atrorney for Dewed Trump. April 28. 2016 The federal e3W1U11 teed Kat* Johnsen v I3onaid J. Trump and Jeffrey E Epsten, accuses Trump and Epstein of rape and Other mouse assaults Cuing the summa of 1994. when plaintiff was 13 years old Morney Garton domed the accusations and east *eerie on the exeaterne of the pia will Attorney Gartens denial of rape claims against Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein dates from April 2016 when the case was filed by a ifteete Jenne:me a PoeninVe NehTlsoryTh, On Aire 28 in LJ. S Distret Caitlin Riverdale, CeiliCeele (none of peentee The case APPSTIWth, Ned pro se by the pantie acting wee:ea a lawyer. sought $103 rmOran m damages from defendants for, among Other tangs, vottang her Civil Rights at-417i making her fl ea sex slave' Tim case appears to nave been brat reported ortre by Elei14 / 14eii cent, when ircluded S Centres clemal as iota as a sarreeng of the lund details of the allegations Other early coverage appears to have been lirreed to other online news sees eltl.Xleg RADAR nitre, Wining 7.-etriocrats, Sunday Exoress kliAleda erg. and HYDetyeleies corn Less than a week after the case was filed larder federal Civil Rights statutes. a federal Judge ruled that rt was a mistake and drumsun the Lase. On May 2. citing the CM, Rieke tees of the sue. the judge wrote 'Even construing the pleading liberally, Fleeter has not alleged terry race-based or class-based animus against her, and conseguertly. her allegations fait to state a dam upon *tech reset may ce granted • The derhaVal receved oven less coverage than the Ring RADAR online reported "Judge Trashes Bogus D>riald Trump Rape Lawsuit,' even though the Judge had rued on7,e on the terms of the fileg, rot on any of the substance of tee case as 'bogus' or otherwise Once diSeitSSed however, Ire case was over, at *ast for the moment Flaired Could have re.feed the OOrTpiThOt zr1CO:TeCt form m Caefornia. Instead she apparently found a lawyer to for for her in New Yak. the horns state el both defendants On June 20, seven weeks after tee California darnssal. New -*mei attorney Thanes Francis Ws ghef bled tie Sarre case in rev sed tam al US Deed Court for the S)uteen Dist:lie of NeW ?orlon terra of teameiff 'Jere Doe proceedng urger a irtietidonyni and seeking a jury trial The filing is lined 'Compiaint for tape, sexual inicicoduct, aininal sexual acts. sexual abuse. forcible touching assault battery intentional and ie rle% Global Research Publishers tnittnan of emotional distress. duress. false imprsonment and defamation' The complarti aurora's central issues in the case suecincey: 'Plainer' was subeact to acts of rape, sexual mtscooduet crenate Sexual aces, sexual abuse. forobe touching °MU!, battery. WentieneI and reclouss inaction of emonanal *stress. duress, false imprisonment, and threats of deals emitter serous bodily injury by the Defendants that tooX place at several penes during the sunvner Meths of 1994 The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New Click Here To Order Online York Oty residence that was teng used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E 71st St. Vanneran (levien as the Weser Mansion) During this period. Plainer! was a Moce of age 13 ' According to tne oorreitaire Plaimth Jane Doe came to New Yolk II re spring of 1994 in MOPe of starting a modeling career. Professorate/ unprepared. she nod little successes and was headed home when she met Tiffany Doe. another pseudonym. who worked for Epsten from 1990 to 20:10 re-outing young women to Mimi hs parties and entertan his guests Tirlany Doe. age 26 in 1934, promised Jane Doe that she would be paid to attend these partes at which she wooer meet people *no could help her start her ell.X5eing career. Jane Doe attended at least four of Eretent parties at when she weeracted with bon, Trump and Epstein sexually. as Gess-reed graphoacy m the complaint and n attached affidavits tithe tee women. Tiffany Doe. in her affidavit says she was a witness to the Ceres described by Jane Doe To compensate for tee treatment Jane Doe seeks unspeafied 'special damages compensatory damages, end puree* cbmages (preen:rely requested 5100 million) The complaint makes several other requests of the court that have not yet been acted on To proceed anonymously - where Jane Doe's ereacy outweighs any peak interest and does not prejudice oefeixterrs To wane any statute of rentations - or. the bass that Defendants threats to harm plaintiff ameer her family ;he/Amity deprived plaintiff of the freedom to fee her complaint earlier To issue a Protective order - to prolate plaintiff 'from harm and harassment from Defendants and their agent* and associates To fire; that Defendants nave defamed Jars Doe - in particular in at-piney Garten's April 28 statement (quoted above) because i '* libelous on es face, and clearly exposes Plaintiff to lotted. contempt. mks* and or:fogey ' Defendants rave not yet feed a response to the June 20 peen et Deist Nor has Mere apparenter been art pJbec response from Attorney Nips no gIobalresnechcalcatrelohroon-v-JonakTiTnyrnp-end-lelhey-c-cpsten-tromp-child-rape-chim•lor-I00-milhon-dohelby•Trummettorney)5511676(6/V20I8 6 35 17 Pelt CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0088070 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00234254 EFTA01386393