EFTA01459553.pdf

CIO View Special ilmt.4. 5:4•Ore Faculty 2016 13 One source of systemic risk could, of course, he the banking sector. At this stage, this looks very unlikely. U.S. banking stocks have been hammered in recent weeks. In January 2016 alone the sector is down 15%. This probably reflects broader capital-market turmoil more than the falling oil price. Direct exposure to the U.S. energy sector looks limited, typically to under 3% of U.S. bank loans. Admittedly, ratios are higher for some of the smaller regional banks. But, banks have already been building up loan-loss provisions on their lending to the energy sector for the last several quarters. This is not a big unknown, in other words. U.S. bank balance sheets are also starting from a stronger position than before previous loan-loss cycles. It remains too early to invest in oil companies and energy-related stocks more broadly. "Even if oil prices double, these levels would still be a nightmare for oil companies", explains Marco Scherer, our Energy Equities Expert at Deutsche AM. For decades, investors could count on oil majors to steadily increase dividends. Oil majors even increased their cash returns as they boosted capital expenditure (capex) (thereby reducing free cash flows (FCF)). Now the majors are struggling just to keep dividends stable. Already, some of them have to revert to paper dividends in order to do so. For the time being, disposals, cost savings and increasing debt levels have helped pay for the dividend. Industry guidance suggests that, in 2017, it would take an oil price of $60/b to cover dividend with free cash flow. At current oil prices, the capacity of oil companies to maintain dividends looks increasingly endangered. Further falls in the oil price would make matters worse. "At $15, both equity and debt instruments with any oil exposure would suffer significant weakness all around the world. Dividend payments and debt service would be unsustainable for vast parts of the sector. The number of defaults would increase, while oil supply would decrease. Despite being a very negative scenario in the short term, it would spur healthy developments in the industry for the medium term.", Marco Scherer notes. Oil price, dividends and free cash flows of Capital expenditure and net debt/EBITDA of MSCI World Energy Index constituents MSCI World Energy Index constituents 1.1:44‘1. 2C11 • MSC1 Wocki Immo :Ensue .-Cnikcil Erpondizteen Rya' • WY! Cr uric otl • N.: W./ WiTOA 1.111 inn!. crab' • Omclaxx` 150 01114 / tv Cent Flow' I00 50 0 .50 00 2011 2012 .1:13 (04-014 Ot.0014 02147:14 01/20I5 gnaws 49,201'3 011201,5 MSCI rno Wolf Enegy mdm Isa 17 MOA: !• Edet•fstiog0.4. 2011 e 5enrcas •coroleo0 Fiwret. P MSCI The Wpkl Fontgy Into; LW a 4µt 12 moot'µ 1.)cutteiko Myr, Vec,vilikisswio.r.sitl.oastr.an not Solaro: rece:c.! Relaxes System, Inc. n of 1/1810 Past performance is not indicative of future returns. No assurance can be given that any forecast, investment objectives and / or expected returns will be achieved. Allocations are subject to change without notice. Forecasts are based on assumptions, estimates, opinions and hypothetical models that may prove to be incorrect. Source: Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management Investment GmbH, as of 02/2016 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0120039 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00266223 EFTA01459553