👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (591 words)
From: Martin Weinberg -MINIM>
To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>, Martin Weinberg
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:55:13 +0000
understood, the log itself is a 6(e) violation, and one that preceded any judicial OK to identify witnesses,
subjects, etc
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
This Electronic Message contains
information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,
and may be privileged. The
information is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you
are not the addressee, please note
that any disclosure, copying,
EFTA00718256
distribution, or use of the
contents of this message is
prohibited.
From: Jeffrey Epstein <• evacation mail.com>
To: Martin Weinberg
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
she also named witnesses , igor etc.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Martin Weinberg < > wrote:
agreed, no value in delay, will get back with you tomorrow after speaking with roy
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
This Electronic Message contains
information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,
and may be privileged. The
EFTA00718257
information is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you
are not the addressee, please note
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the
contents of this message is
prohibited.
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
To: Martin Weinberg <
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
what about you and roy going to ferrar sooner rather than later?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Martin Weinberg < wrote:
Jeffrey
A rough first draft of a possible intervention motion on 6(e). We will expand it, but I am inclined to redact
phrases like "draft indictments" so it is not us that is inserting that info into public pleadings. We need to
feature your privacy interests - which will lead, inexorably, to a further Cassell attack saying you have no
reputational interest to defend. Whether we pre-emptively try through this motion to put in front of J Marra
all the good you've done since this case that would be at risk if this historic (and presumptively private stuff)
gets to public is something we should think about (science foundation, grants, philanthropy, years since this
case etc). We will be bound by the strict pg limits and timelines Court gave Cassell in his 6-19 Order
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
EFTA00718258
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00718259
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
246aab248d51f94a0d233edc59e15e57056d5b406ddcc57ff8de381a7502c013
Bates Number
EFTA00718256
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
4
💬 Comments 0