📄 Extracted Text (1,159 words)
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
To: PETER MANDELSON •,= >
Subject: EDITS
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:15:11 +0000
THE STRATEGY YOU HAVE SAID YOU WANT IS ONE THAT MOVES FROM
REFERENDUM TO CHOICE. I AGREE . WE WANT TO GET PEOPLE TO THE POINT OF
FEELING THAT, AT HEART, LABOUR IS MORE IN THEIR INTERESTS; THE TORIES ARE A
RISK; AND THAT DESPITE THEIR MISGIVINGS ABOUT VOTING BACK A GOVT THAT
HAS BEEN IN OFFICE FOR THIRTEEN YEARS, THEY ARE MORE AT EASE WITH THE
PRESENT TEAM THAN ONE THAT IS UNTESTED AND UNCERTAIN.
WE HAVE TO RECOGNISE WE ARE A LONG WAY FROM ACHIEVING THIS ELECTORAL
JUDGEMENT.
I CANNOT SAY FOR SURE WHERE THE POLLS WILL GO IN COMING WEEKS BUT MY
HUNCH IS THAT THE MORE THE TORIES FIRM UP ON THEIR POLICY OFFER (WHICH
THEY ARE LIKELY TO DO IN LIGHT OF OUR "POLICY-FREE" TAUNTS OF THEM) THE
MORE VOTERS WILL FIRM UP THEIR SUPPORT FOR THE ALTERNATIVE (UNLESS
CAMERON DOES SOMETHING VERY STUPID ON POLICY WHICH IS UNLIKELY). TORY
SPLITS ON POLICY ARE UNLIKELY TO OCCUR. INSTEAD THEY WILL RIDE EASILY ON
BACK OF THE MOOD FOR CHANGE, SHARPENING IT AS THEY GO, PLAYING DOWN
THE MISTAKE THEY MADE AT THEIR CONFERENCE OF TELLING PEOPLE HOW
AUSTERE TORY GOVT WILL BE.
AGAINST THIS, WE ARE LEFT TO HOPE FOR BRIGHTENING ECONOMIC PROSPECTS
AND POSITIVE GROWTH WITH THE CHANCE OF ABETTER THE DEVIL YOU KNOW'
CONCLUSION.
AS THINGS STAND NOW, HOWEVER, I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS WILL BRING US BACK
OUR LOST 'NEW LABOUR' COALITION VOTERS. OUR 'CORE' VOTE WILL FIRM UP AND
BRING US TO A STEADY 30% BUT THIS WILL NOT BE NEARLY ENOUGH IN OUR
MARGINALS WHERE OUR SUPPORT HAS ERODED MORE THAN THE NATIONAL POLLS
INDICATE.
THERE IS A FURTHER DANGER. THIS IS THAT OUR 'DIVIDING LINES' MINDSET .THE
RHETORIC ALIENATES OUR LOST VOTERS EVEN MORE BECAUSE IT IS TOO CRUDE,
TOO POPULIST, TOO ANTI-WEALTHY AND THEREFORE COMES ACROSS AS POPULIST
AND ANTI-ASPIRATIONAL. I BELIEVE THAT 'FAIRNESS AGAINST PRIVILEGE' IS A
STRONG LABOUR TEMPLATE. BUT IT IS NOT ENOUGH AND IF APPLIED TOO
UNTHINKINGLY, OR IN ISOLATION, CAN BACKFIRE BECAUSE IT STARTS TO SOUND A
BIT DESPERATE.
EFTA00743941
SINCE OUR PARTY CONFERENCE WE HAVE STRENGTHENED AS ECONOMIC
CONFIDENCE HAS GROWN AND BECAUSE CAMERON MISFIRED. BUT HE DID SO NOT
BECAUSE HIS STRATEGY WAS WRONG BUT BECAUSE IT WAS INSUFFICIENTLY
NUANCED. HIS MESSAGE OF 'TOUGH TIMES AHEAD' IS RIGHT BECAUSE IT IS WHERE
THE PUBLICS OWN PERCEPTIONS ARE AND IT SHOWS LEADERSHIP ON HIS PART.
THEY KNOW BRITAIN HAS TAKEN A BEATING AND THAT RECOVERY IS GOING TO BE
LONG IN COMING. IN THE PBR, WE CHOSE TO FIGHT AGAINST THESE PERCEPTIONS. I
DO NOT BELIEVE WE WON THIS FIGHT. WE PUT OURSELVES ON THE SIDE OF
'PROTECTING PEOPLE' BUT AT THE EXPENSE OF CREDIBILITY. I FELT AND SAID THIS
BEFOREHAND BUT I SHOULD HAVE SPOKEN UP MORE FIRMLY.. WE DO NOT HAVE A
PROPER AND OPEN STRATEGIC DIALOGUE AMONGST US. THIS IS AN IMPERATIVE.
UNFORTUNATELY. IT NOW APPEARS THAT ONCE YOU HAVE MADE UP YOUR MIND IT
IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DISCUSS THINGS FRANKLY AND COLLECTIVELY.
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE ? HOW DO WE GET TO A CHOICE BETWEEN THE
PARTIES THAT FAVOURS US ?
WE MUST RECLAIM LEADERSHIP AS WELL AS FUTURE, ALONGSIDE FAIRNESS.
AND THERE IS ONLY ONE REAL LEADERSHIP/FUTURE GAME IN TOWN AND THAT IS
THE ECONOMY. GROWTH IS CENTRAL TO THIS BUT AT PRESENT OUR GROWTH
MESSAGE IS IMPAIRED BY OUR APPARENT UNREALISM ABOUT THE PUBLIC
FINANCES. PEOPLE WILL NOT ACCEPT OUR COMMITMENT AND POLICIES ON
GROWTH WITHOUT COHERENCE ON THE FINANCES. WE STARTED TO TAKE
TOUGHER ACTION IN THE PBR BUT SIMULTANEOUSLY APPEARED TO DENY WE
WERE DOING SO. YOU AND ALISTAIR WERE IN DIFFERENT PLACES AND THE RESULT
WAS COMMUNICATIONS FUDGE AND WEAKENED PERCEPTIONS OF LEADERSHIP,
BOOSTING 'TIME FOR A CHANGE'..THIS CANNOT CONTINUE IF WE ARE TO WIN.
WE CANNOT POWER OUR CAMPAIGN WHILST BEING UNCLEAR ON STRATEGY AND
THEREFORE IN MESSAGE. IF THIS CONTINUES THE APPEARANCE OF LACK OF IDEAS
AND ENERGY WILL GROW, AND WE WILL FAIL TO RE-CONNECT. ABOVE ALL, IT IS
HAMPERING YOU BECAUSE IT MUFFLES YOUR VOICE.
OUR TASK IS TO CONTINUE TO BUILD CORE VOTE WHILE REGAINING OUR 'NEW
LABOUR' SUPPORT. WE MUST CONTINUE TO BE SERIOUS RE DEBT AND PUBLIC
FINANCES BUT DO MUCH MORE ON ASPIRATION. WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL THAT
OUR DIVIDING LINES DO NOT UNWITTINGLY COME ACROSS AS ANTI-ASPIRATIONAL
AND 'SECTIONAL' RATHER THAN 'NATIONAL'. UNLESS WE ARE MANIFESTLY
WORKING IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST, AS OPPOSED TO APPEARING TO WORK IN
OUR PARTY INTEREST, WE WILL NOT ADVANCE. THIS DOES NOT MEAN STOPPING TO
EXPLOIT LACK OF TRUST IN THE TORIES. IN PARTICULAR, WE HAVE TO WIN THE
ARGUMENT THAT THEY HAVE NOT CHANGED SUFFICIENTLY. BUT ALONE, WE HAVE
TO RECOGNISE THIS IS NOT ENOUGH FOR US. WE HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE
CONVINCINGLY THAT WE UNDERSTAND THE VOTERS' DESIRE FOR CHANGE AND
THAT WE OFFER CHANGE FROM THE PRESENT. SIMPLY OFFERING REASSURANCE
AND SECURITY (AS THE PBR TRIED TO DO IMPLICITLY) IS NOT ENOUGH. NOR IS
EFTA00743942
MAKING PEOPLE FEARFUL OF TORY CHANGE ENOUGH. WE HAVE TO MAKE A
FUTURE OFFER OF OUR OWN THAT SHOWS BOLDNESS AND LEADERSHIP.
WE HAVE TO FRAME OUR CAMPAIGN AS THE PARTY THAT CAN BUILD ON
EXPERIENCE AND VALUES TO OFFER BOTH RECOVERY AND FAIRNESS, TAKING
HARD AND HONEST DECISIONS IN THE PROCESS. YOU ARE RIGHT THAT THE
GROWTH PRIORITY AND STRONG COMMUNITIES ARE KEY TO THIS. BUT VOTERS SEE
AND HEAR OUR POLICIES FOR BOTH ONLY WEAKLY AND INTERMITTENTLY, AND IN
ANY CASE WILL DOUBT OUR DELIVERY OF THEM WHEN THEY CANNOT SEE HOW
WE ARE SORTING OUT THE PUBLIC FINANCES.
IF WE CANNOT ACHIEVE THIS WE CANNOT FIGHT A CAMPAIGN ON CHOICE. WE WILL
BE LEFT WITH CONTINUITY - AND AN ATTEMPT TO OFFER SECURITY - BECAUSE WE
HAVE NOT GOT ENOUGH 'CHANGE' TO MAKE A STRONG ENOUGH - AND CREDIBLE
ENOUGH - OFFER ON FUTURE.
AS THINGS STAND AT THE MOMENT, THE PUBLIC ARE NOT IN THE MOOD TO CARRY
OUT ON THEIR OWN THE RE-ASSESSMENT OF US WE URGENTLY NEED. WE HAVE TO
JOLT THEM INTO DOING SO. WE CANNOT DO THIS WITHOUT STRONG, TOUGH,
UNITED COMMUNICATIONS.I BELIEVE WE DO NOT HAVE THIS AT THE MOMENT,
THE PUBLIC ARE NOT YET FULLY SIGNED UP TO THE TORIES. BUT THE LATER IT
GOES, THE HARDER IT BECOMES TO FORCE THE RE-ASSESSMENT WE WANT.
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
EFTA00743943
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
24b628e08d16d5a9d6a6193c0afba996d4a3c427049f47e923ceab6cb7f777ac
Bates Number
EFTA00743941
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0