podesta_email_02570.txt

podesta-emails 6,085 words email

P17 D6 P22 V11 V13

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Thursday October 23, 2014 Afternoon Roundup:* *Headlines:* *Capital New York: Hillary Clinton to stump for Sean Patrick Maloney <http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/city-hall/2014/10/8555194/hillary-clinton-stump-sean-patrick-maloney?top-featured-1>* “Hillary Clinton will headline a women's-themed event for Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney in Westchester County on Monday.” *Associated Press: Hillary Clinton Supports Cuomo for NY Governor <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/hillary-clinton-supports-cuomo-ny-governor-26402563>* “Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is backing New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in his bid for a second term.” *The Hill: Warren: Nothing has changed <http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/221622-warren-nothing-has-changed>* “Nothing has changed for Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) when it comes to a 2016 run for the White House.” *Huffington Post: Chuck Todd Hopes The Media Has 'Grown Up' On Sexist Hillary Clinton Coverage <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/23/chuck-todd-sexist-hilary-clinton-coverage_n_6035252.html?utm_hp_ref=media>* “’Meet the Press’ host Chuck Todd offered the media some words of advice for covering Hillary Clinton's potential presidential run this time around: Grow up.” *The National Memo: Ready For 2016? Too Bad <http://www.nationalmemo.com/ready-2016-bad/>* “Basically, the author has performed a simple trick: putting leftward spin on GOP talking points from the 1990s. Because everybody’s either forgotten the details or never knew them, it’s possible to make long discredited charges of corruption against both Clintons sound plausible again.” *TIME: An Intimate Portrait of Hillary Clinton in Photographs <http://lightbox.time.com/2014/10/23/hillary-clinton-diana-walker/#1>* “Starting in 1993 within the White House’s walls, Walker documented Hillary as she moved from her roles as First Lady, Senator, Presidential Candidate and, later, Secretary of State.” *SILive: Rep. Michael Grimm says Hillary, rightward pull of primaries make 2016 tough for GOP (commentary) <http://www.silive.com/opinion/strictly-political/2014/10/rep_michael_grimm_says_hillary.html>* “The election is still two years away, and a lot can change in that time, but GOP Rep. Michael Grimm said he already knows who the most formidable Democratic candidate will be: Hillary Clinton.” *FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters: Chuck Todd On Media Sexism And "Disease" Of Fatigue Toward Hillary Clinton <http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/10/23/chuck-todd-on-media-sexism-and-disease-of-fatig/201276>* "In the final installment of Media Matters' three-part interview series with Todd, the new Meet the Press host discusses the challenges facing media outlets covering a possible Clinton White House bid." *Associated Press, via North County Public Radio: Bill Clinton to rally for Rep. Maffei in Syracuse <http://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/story/26413/20141023/bill-clinton-to-rally-for-rep-maffei-in-syracuse>* “Bill Clinton's barnstorming tour is coming to Syracuse with a get-out-the-vote rally for Rep. Dan Maffei.” *Ralston Reports: Bubba to the rescue <http://www.ralstonreports.com/blog/bubba-rescue>* “I'm told the one-man Democratic turnout machine will be in Southern Nevada next week to try to juice Democratic turnout that so far has been abysmal. Clinton could help all Democrats, but my guess is this is especially targted at Rep.Steven Horsford, who needs minority voters to get energized in a district once thought safe.” *Washington Post: Warren on Hillary Clinton relationship: ‘We have talked. It’s not much more than that.’ <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/10/23/warren-on-hillary-clinton-relationship-we-have-talked-its-not-much-more-than-that/>* "Warren has repeatedly said she does not plan to run for president in 2016..." *Articles:* *Capital New York: Hillary Clinton to stump for Sean Patrick Maloney <http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/city-hall/2014/10/8555194/hillary-clinton-stump-sean-patrick-maloney?top-featured-1>* By Reid Pillifant October 23, 2014 12:12 p.m. EDT Hillary Clinton will headline a women's-themed event for Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney in Westchester County on Monday. The free Women for Maloney event will be held in Somers, according to a release from the campaign. Clinton has been active this cycle on behalf of House and Senate candidates and the respective party committees, but this will be her first appearance for an individual congressional candidate in New York, a spokeswoman for Maloney's campaign told Capital. Maloney is facing a re-match against Republican former congresswoman Nan Hayworth, who won the Hudson Valley swing district in 2010, but lost to Maloney in 2012. A Siena survey released last week showed the race tightening, with Hayworth leading among voters re-contacted by Siena from a September poll in which Maloney led by eight points. (Siena pollsters cautioned the re-survey was not as scientific as a typical poll.) Maloney served as an aide in the White House under Bill Clinton, who endorsed him in 2012 and also appeared at a pre-election rally in Somers. (Bill Clinton was on Long Island yesterday with Rep. Tim Bishop, who is also facing a tough re-election race.) Hillary Clinton is appearing this morning with Governor Andrew Cuomo for a Women's Equality Party event in Manhattan. *Associated Press: Hillary Clinton Supports Cuomo for NY Governor <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/hillary-clinton-supports-cuomo-ny-governor-26402563>* By Jonathan Lemire October 23, 2014 12:36 p.m. EDT Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is backing New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in his bid for a second term. Clinton appeared Thursday at a Manhattan rally with the Democratic incumbent and his pick for lieutenant governor, Kathy Hochul (HOH'-kuhl). Clinton says Cuomo is the "right leader at the right time." The rally was run by the Woman's Equality Party, a political organization founded by Cuomo. Clinton is considered the presumptive front-runner for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination if she decides to run. She lives in a New York City suburb. Cuomo has also been touted as a potential presidential candidate but is unlikely to mount a bid if Clinton runs. Cuomo faces Republican Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino in the Nov. 4 general election. *The Hill: Warren: Nothing has changed <http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/221622-warren-nothing-has-changed>* By Kevin Cirilli October 23, 2014 9:00 a.m. EDT Nothing has changed for Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) when it comes to a 2016 run for the White House. Warren in an interview with People magazine talked about how “amazing doors” can open and you can’t be sure “what lies ahead” when she was asked about a White House run. She also said that she was focused on the Senate “for now.” But a spokeswoman for Warren said that’s not meant to signal something new. "Nothing has changed," Warren spokeswoman Lacey Rose said in a statement to The Hill. Warren’s travel plans, along with the People magazine comments, have fueled speculation about her plans. Earlier this week, she campaigned for Democratic senatorial candidate Bruce Braley in Iowa, an important early caucus state for the 2016 presidential cycle. The comments to People also seemed softer than comments she made earlier this year, when Warren told ABC News: "I'm not running for president." The next day, she reiterated the statement to CBS's Charlie Rose: "You can ask this a whole lot of different ways, but the key is, I’m not running for president." *Huffington Post: Chuck Todd Hopes The Media Has 'Grown Up' On Sexist Hillary Clinton Coverage <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/23/chuck-todd-sexist-hilary-clinton-coverage_n_6035252.html?utm_hp_ref=media>* By Jackson Connor October 23, 2014 11:41 a.m. EDT "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd offered the media some words of advice for covering Hillary Clinton's potential presidential run this time around: Grow up. In an interview with Media Matters, Todd told reporter Joe Strupp that he hopes the media will finally enter the 21st century and leave the sexism behind. "I'd like to think that there isn't going to be sexist coverage," he said. "Like, good grief, we live in the 21st -- I can't even imagine it being treated differently anymore. I really think that -- I'd like to think the media's grown up about that." For Todd -- who replaced David Gregory as host of "Meet the Press" last month and has himself been trying to update the Sunday morning talk show -- covering a female presidential candidate with respect and fairness is of the utmost importance. "Maybe I'm wrong," he continued. "Now, that doesn't mean it may not get used as a political tactic one way or the other, just because that's politics sometimes? Identity politics can sometimes bring out the worst in people on the left and right." *The National Memo: Ready For 2016? Too Bad <http://www.nationalmemo.com/ready-2016-bad/>* By Gene Lyons October 22, 2014 12:00 a.m. EDT By hard pundit law, nonstop media coverage of the 2016 presidential campaign begins on the morning after the 2014 congressional elections — approximately 18 months before normal Americans want to hear about it. However, like the “countdown” to major sporting events, it’s also a cable TV ratings booster. With politicians and pundits eager to score TV face time, it’s also cheap and easy to produce. So ready or not, here comes Campaign 2016. For a monthly magazine like Harper’s to jump the gun by two weeks requires considerable enterprise. “STOP HILLARY,” the magazine’s November 2014 cover insists. “Vote No to a Clinton Dynasty.” First, a quibble about terminology. A dynasty, properly speaking, is a multi-generational, inherited thing. In an American context, it’s legitimate to speak of the Roosevelts, Kennedys and Bushes as dynastic families parlaying inherited wealth into political power. As author Doug Henwood sniffishly points out, however, Bill and Hillary Clinton are what French aristocrats call “arrivistes”—nobodies from nowhere who climbed the power ladder through what he calls the “neoliberal” strategy of “nonstop self-promotion.” That this cavil would apply to virtually all American politicians seems not to have occurred to Henwood, whose loathing of the couple transcends such mundane considerations. To him, the whole case for Hillary Clinton’s candidacy “boils down to this: She has experience, she’s a woman, and it’s her turn. It’s hard to find any substantive political argument in her favor.” Maybe so, maybe not. But then Henwood, writing from the left, seems not to have looked very hard. His essay begins and ends with the appraisals of Dick Morris, perhaps America’s least credible political prognosticator. Indeed, the author acknowledges in a footnote that Morris’s “pronouncements on both Bill and Hillary should be taken with a substantial grain of salt.” Even Fox News let Morris go after his forecast of a Mitt Romney landslide went awry. So why feature the man at all? For that matter, why am I bothering with Henwood ? Two reasons. First, personal disappointment that such slipshod work could appear in Harper’s. Twenty years ago, the magazine stuck its journalistic neck out to publish my article and book Fools for Scandal: How the Media Invented Whitewater. Second, because Henwood’s piece signals the inevitable return of what I call the “Clinton Rules.” Particularly when it comes to the couple’s background in darkest Arkansas, no allegation of wrongdoing, regardless of how conclusively disproved, has ever disappeared from the national news media. That such shoddy standards have become well-nigh universal in American political journalism is no excuse. Because everybody involved back in 1996 understood that calling out The New York Times — which originated and sustained the Whitewater hoax — was a serious business, Harper’s actually dispatched a fact checker to Little Rock, where we spent several days bulletproofing the manuscript. Clearly, no such effort went into Henwood’s essay. Basically, the author has performed a simple trick: putting leftward spin on GOP talking points from the 1990s. Because everybody’s either forgotten the details or never knew them, it’s possible to make long discredited charges of corruption against both Clintons sound plausible again. Whitewater, Henwood assures readers, definitely “was not nothing.” What it may have been, however, he appears to have no clue. The most basic facts elude him. No, the late Jim McDougal’s doomed Madison Guaranty savings and loan did not finance the Clintons’ real estate investment. They were never “investors in McDougal’s [other] schemes.” Maybe Henwood would better understand the Clintons’ surprising “escape from the Whitewater morass” if he grasped that they were basically the victims, not the perps. Here’s how Kenneth Starr’s prosecutor Ray Jahn put it in his closing argument at poor, mentally ill Jim McDougal’s trial: “Why isn’t the President of the United States on trial?…Because he didn’t set up any phony corporations to get employees to sign for loans that were basically worthless…The president didn’t backdate any leases. He didn’t backdate any documents. He didn’t come up with any phony reasons not to repay the property. He didn’t lie to any examiners. He didn’t lie to any investors.” As for Susan McDougal, yes, it’s true she served 18 months for civil contempt after refusing to testify to a Whitewater grand jury in what she saw as a partisan perjury trap. However, it’s also true — if seemingly unknown to Henwood — that after Starr’s prosecutors charged her with criminal contempt, she testified for several days in open court, and was acquitted. Ancient history, yes. But history. The Ray Jahn quote, for example, comes directly from Joe Conason’s and my book The Hunting of the President. Regarding Henwood’s pronouncement that it’s “ideologically dubious” of Hillary Clinton to “make friends with her Republican colleagues,” readers can judge for themselves. However, a journalist who chooses to question a presidential candidate’s character by dragging up 20-year-old controversies owes it to readers to know two or three things about them. *TIME: An Intimate Portrait of Hillary Clinton in Photographs <http://lightbox.time.com/2014/10/23/hillary-clinton-diana-walker/#1>* October 23, 2014 By Paul Moakley Diana Walker’s skill documenting life behind the scenes in Washington D.C. stems directly from her dedication to subjects and her often subtle approach to photography. “I was trying to be as discreet as possible,” she tells TIME, speaking about stepping into the White House to work on her latest book Hillary: The Photographs of Diana Walker, which saw her turn her lens towards Hillary Clinton. “I hardly ever spoke unless spoken to — I was not there for myself and I wanted them to ignore me,” she adds. “I used to rewind the film looking down and away from them so that I wouldn’t catch their eye or make them think they had to speak to me.” Walker worked as TIME’s White House photographer for 20 years, capturing five presidencies. In that time, she also documented luminaries such as Steve Jobs with the same intimacy she often portrayed in the oval office. Starting in 1993 within the White House’s walls, Walker documented Hillary as she moved from her roles as First Lady, Senator, Presidential Candidate and, later, Secretary of State. “To have the opportunity to photograph somebody for 20 years is such a gift to a photographer,” Walker says, “Hillary Clinton, it seems to me, means a lot to women today. I think that she represents the opportunities for women in our country.” Walker photographed Clinton for TIME up until October 2011, when she captured the now-iconic photograph of the Secretary of State putting on her shades to check her phone in the belly of a military C41 aircraft. The photograph later inspired the meme Texts from Hillary. Is she responsible for Hillary becoming an online icon of cool? “I would love to have that reputation, ” Walker says, laughing. “I think we would all like to be cool at some stage in our lives.” *SILive: Rep. Michael Grimm says Hillary, rightward pull of primaries make 2016 tough for GOP (commentary) <http://www.silive.com/opinion/strictly-political/2014/10/rep_michael_grimm_says_hillary.html>* By Tom Wrobleski October 23, 2014 9:00 a.m. EDT STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. – The election is still two years away, and a lot can change in that time, but GOP Rep. Michael Grimm said he already knows who the most formidable Democratic candidate will be: Hillary Clinton. "I think it's going to be very difficult for the Republicans to beat Hillary Clinton," Grimm (R-Staten Island/Brooklyn) told the Advance Editorial Board, where he appeared with Democratic challenger Domenic M. Recchia Jr. "So I think that a lot of work has got to go into it." But Hillary is only one obstacle for the Republicans, Grimm said. The other problem is within the party itself, with presidential primaries pulling candidates further and further rightward. "If we continue to have primaries that push the Republican Party so far to the right, then we'll never win the presidency again," Grimm said. "We can't do that. We cannot be so far to the right that we're not inclusive, and we're losing out on the 70 percent of Americans that are either center-right or center-left, who are somewhat independent." Said Grimm, "That's the biggest issue I see for the Republican Party." Recchia is already four-square behind Hillary for president, even though the former Secretary of State, U.S. Senator from New York and First Lady has yet to declare her candidacy for 2016. "I support Hillary," he said. "Let's see her be the first woman president. I think it would be great." But Grimm said Hillary also faces a big challenge on the road to the White House: "The debacle and absolute atrocity of Benghazi." "I think the cover-up of Benghazi is going to be a big issue," Grimm said, referring to the attack on the U.S. Diplomatic Mission there. "And just a lot of the failures that have happened as Secretary of State, it's going to be a big issue for Hillary Clinton." But even with that being said, Grimm added, "The Republicans still have to come up with someone that's electable. And getting through that primary process, I think, is the biggest challenge to the Republican Party." "I think Hillary's electable," Recchia said. "I think she'll be able to overcome those issues." *FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters: Chuck Todd On Media Sexism And "Disease" Of Fatigue Toward Hillary Clinton <http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/10/23/chuck-todd-on-media-sexism-and-disease-of-fatig/201276>* By Joe Strupp October 23, 2014 10:12 a.m. EDT [Subtitle:] Part Three Of A Three-Part Interview Series Chuck Todd hopes the media has "grown up" and will avoid sexist coverage of Hillary Clinton's potential 2016 presidential run. In the final installment of Media Matters' three-part interview series with Todd, the new Meet the Press host discusses the challenges facing media outlets covering a possible Clinton White House bid. During her 2008 presidential run, Clinton faced near-constant sexism from the press. Asked whether things might be different if Clinton chooses to run in 2016, Todd explained he'd "like to think the media's grown up about that." Nonetheless, he cautioned, "Identity politics can sometimes bring out the worst in people on the left and right." According to Todd, the Clintons' decades-long presence in the public eye presents challenges for both her potential campaign and for reporters that might eventually cover it. In a September interview with PBS host Charlie Rose, Todd said that the press often misrepresents the idea that there is a "Clinton fatigue problem," explaining that the "fatigue" actually rests with the press and not people in the Democratic Party, with whom the former secretary of state is very popular. Todd expanded on those comments to Media Matters, saying that media outlets need to avoid "'been there, done that' disease." Todd said that outlets need to utilize their long history of covering Clinton while being wary of "preconceived notions" and employing a "fresh set of eyes." Clinton herself recently lamented the tendency of the press to focus on "the best angle, quickest hit, the biggest embarrassment" at the expense of more substantive news. Todd agreed with Clinton, saying that "what gets the attention and what gets clicks" for political reporters is "the gotcha moment." But he added that "the media isn't doing it on their own." Pointing to the proliferation of opposition research on both sides, Todd said that while it used to be utilized by the press merely to highlight hypocrisy, it's turned into "where's every negative thing I can find." "So it doesn't matter how responsible 70 percent of the journalism community is," Todd said. "There's always a 30 percent chunk that is willing to just take whatever's handed them." He added, "it doesn't matter if the mainstream media is responsible when you have the 10,000 other outlets to get below-the-belt stuff out, right?" The first part of the interview series covered Todd's thoughts on the media's handling of scandals and crises. Part two focused on Todd's goals for Meet the Press. Relevant transcript from Todd's Media Matters interview has been published with each part. Answers covered in part three are below: MEDIA MATTERS: Now, you talk about 2016. Hillary Clinton criticized the press just recently for making it harder for qualified candidates who want to serve in office and run. She said that rather than giving people information so they can make decision -- so they can be decision-makers, the press is overly focused on, quote, "the best angle, quickest hit, the biggest embarrassment." TODD: Right. MEDIA MATTERS: Do you think the press focuses too much on that kind of politics of destruction and not enough on policies? TODD: Well, I definitely think it -- MEDIA MATTERS: And how does that affect -- TODD: Well, here's the thing. I think that there's an array of press out there that does everything. I think that what gets the attention and what gets clicks, is what? Right? Is sort of the gotcha moment, right? But what I'm curious about -- every candidate that complains about this, are they going to not have opposition researchers feeding the press? I mean, I'm not saying -- look, the press should be grown up enough to say, "Well, what am I doing?" But this is a two-way street. We're destroying the process together here. The media isn't doing it on their own. MEDIA MATTERS: No. And you're obviously -- you have a whole hour to get more in-depth on things -- TODD: That's right, so I don't have this issue that -- MEDIA MATTERS: But it is something that's out there -- TODD: But my feeling is -- MEDIA MATTERS: No? TODD: Opposition research -- look, here's what's happened. Right? The world of opposition research used to be an attempt to find out what in somebody's background can we make the case that they're sort of, they're hypocritical on Issue X. You know, that they haven't practiced what they've been preaching. Right? Which is, on one hand -- that's essentially what it was about. But it's now turned into basically, where's every negative thing I can find? And there's always an outlet to get it out there. So it doesn't matter how responsible 70 percent of the journalism community is. There's always a 30 percent chunk that is willing to just take whatever's handed them. And just to take viral video and post it as fact, or just to take tracker video and just put it out there. So, I agree with her statement. I think that the entire process -- and I start with the oligarchs, the billionaires that are like, we're spending -- those guys are spending more money collectively in these races than the campaigns themselves, OK? I think it starts there. So, you're an average public -- you're somebody that would like to get involved in public service. Here's the system you may be climbing into. You have issues you care about, but a super PAC may decide what issues you get to debate. You don't. MEDIA MATTERS: Sure. TODD: That's number one. Number two, let's say you've been successful in your community -- whatever you've been doing. Working in the public space, working in the private space, whatever it is. Your personal reputation is going to get scrubbed, shall we say. Let me be kind about this. Everybody's past has something that may look bad in a moment, even if it wasn't that bad at the time. And all of that gets drug out. So you have the very real possibility that your personal reputation could be in tatters by the end of the campaign. And if you lose, you've got to go back to your old job. And can you effectively do it? It becomes almost like, it's very risky now for your personal reputation, just because of the way opposition research works now, the way the press has less and less sort of, filter, in basically -- and again, it doesn't matter if the mainstream media is responsible when you have the 10,000 other outlets to get below-the-belt stuff out, right? So, now you're this candidate, so you have to weigh that. Oh, and then let's say you get to the Senate and Congress, and you find out unless you're in leadership, you have no say. You have no ability to actually get legislation passed anymore, the way the system is worked. And then you end up finding out that whoever you hire, they're going to be with you for two years, and then they're going to flip, go across the street, and become a lobbyist and make 10 times your salary. OK? That's the definition of a system on the brink of breaking. Because what you then do is, you then end up with candidates -- you have a harder time -- the smartest, most successful people suddenly think public service is too much of a risk, and there's too little reward. MEDIA MATTERS: Oh yeah, and so a lot of people are staying out -- TODD: So they pass -- correct. So, that's when I say I agree with her. But to lay the blame just at the feet of the press? We've got a whole lot of other players. MEDIA MATTERS: Now, another thing about Clinton that you mentioned, you said about "Clinton fatigue" that it's a press corps problem and that it really -- TODD: The press have it. Press fatigue, not the public, yeah. MEDIA MATTERS: How do you think reporters -- TODD: Well, I think it's a huge issue. MEDIA MATTERS: How do you think reporters who are already bored, maybe, with fatigue, could affect news coverage? And can she -- TODD: It can happen. MEDIA MATTERS: -- get a fair shake? TODD: Look, this is a constant question, so I have a little test I do with myself. And I try to self-check, and I try to get people who work for me to self-check. Which is what I call, don't get "been there, done that" disease. OK? It happens a lot in politics. And when you have "been there, done that" disease, then you just assume that an African-American can't win Southern states, or you just assume -- you know what I mean? You make assumptions that were true until they're not. Right? The beauty of a democracy is that eventually, everything that you think you know changes. And then there is a new "everything you need to know," and then it changes, right? I mean, you can just sometimes look at it just on -- do you know almost every state in the union has been a swing state at one point in time? Right? And it just -- because things change. Everything changes. It's constantly changes. Now, it happens incrementally, and then all of a sudden, a decade later, you look back and went, "Oh my god. New Jersey's no longer a swing state. It's solid blue." Well, that isn't the way it started in 1992. Anyway, but that's just doing, you know, -- so -- MEDIA MATTERS: How does this affect Hillary [unintelligible] -- TODD: How this affects Hillary is, I think there's going to be -- MEDIA MATTERS: -- with this approach by the press? TODD: -- a lot of a reporters who feel like they've been covering the Clintons -- and look, some of us have, in some form or another -- for 24 years. MEDIA MATTERS: Sure. TODD: Right? You have a built-up history. That's -- a good thing to have is history. At the same time, it can also lead to preconceived notions about somebody. And so I think that every news organization should say to themselves, "You need a" -- on somebody -- you need -- I think you need that history -- that matters -- and you need a fresh set of eyes. Right? You need a little bit of both. Now -- and this is then a challenge then for the Clinton campaign, is they also have preconceived notions about the media. MEDIA MATTERS: Yes. TODD: And then what happens is that can then quickly make all the old complaints, say, that an experienced reporter might have had with the old Clinton team seem relevant, and seem, "Oh, well, they were on to something, boy, I'm getting the same treatment" type of thing. So, I think it's a challenge for her and her team, and at the same time, they have to figure out how to -- look, one of their great misjudgments, if you want to call it that, is I think that they didn't -- they were slower on the importance of the sped-up media news cycle. MEDIA MATTERS: You mean the last time she ran? TODD: Yes. MEDIA MATTERS: Yeah. TODD: You know what I mean? If you were to say what was the one -- here was the most polished -- think about Bill Clinton, right? Here was the most polished politician who understood 20th century media as well as anybody -- MEDIA MATTERS: Sure. TODD: -- cable, all this stuff, who totally seemed out of sorts when suddenly dealing with embeds and dealing with the -- you know, you're traveling -- a different set of travelling press corps and every print reporter carrying a camera, you know what I mean? MEDIA MATTERS: Yeah. TODD: That was a new experience -- MEDIA MATTERS: It's a lot different than when he ran. TODD: Totally. MEDIA MATTERS: And it'll be even different this time than when she first began. TODD: Well, and that's going to be her challenge. MEDIA MATTERS: Now, one of the things you also brought -- you were criticized for comments about Hillary Clinton as a front-runner, saying if she were running to be the second woman president, she wouldn't even be considered a front-runner. TODD: Correct. I was just saying -- MEDIA MATTERS: I mean, is that fair? TODD: Well, what I was saying is that this was a part of, does she match with where the Democratic Party is today, ideologically? Right? That was about where I think the Democratic Party is certainly to the left of where she was in '07. Now, you can argue that she has been sort of on political hiatus domestically, right? That she has been -- when you are serving as secretary of state, you actually are not allowed to be in the political realm, right? MEDIA MATTERS: Right. TODD: You are not allowed to be in campaigns, things like that. So I think that was the statement I made. I know some of the critics -- it's always funny to me sometimes when people want to get mad at a reporter for something, they do the same thing that they get mad at reporters for doing, which is, they don't look for context. They just want to criticize the sound bite, rather than saying, "Well, what was the full context of what they were talking about?" And of course the second, third, and fourth sentences were about, where is ideologically the Democratic Party today? Is it closer to Elizabeth Warren or is it closer to Hillary Clinton? MEDIA MATTERS: So it wasn't so much that she was a woman, the first woman, it was more about -- TODD: Well, right. But the point is, she is able to overcome what I think are some potentially stark ideological differences -- MEDIA MATTERS: Because she would be the first woman? TODD: I'm sorry, I think somebody's on -- the ability to elect the first woman president. And the enthusiasm that's truly there in the rank-and-file inside the Democratic Party I think can overcome the ideological differences that are inside of the party, that she could have. And that's why I said if she were running, if it weren't the phenomenon of, "OK, let's break this glass ceiling," there'd be more focus and attention and more concern perhaps in the progressive community about her ideological instincts. I think she's instinctually probably not necessarily where the progressive movement wants to go. MEDIA MATTERS: How about -- let me ask you this, and I know we're probably running out of time -- TODD: And that's where -- that's the common -- that's the point I was trying to make. MEDIA MATTERS: I want to get as many questions in as I can, because I appreciate your time. TODD: Yeah, I have about three minutes. [inaudible] MEDIA MATTERS: How about the sexist claims of coverage about her in 2008? Do you think there'll be more of that or will that kind of tone down? TODD: Look, I don't know. I think that's always an -- if -- I don't have a good answer on that. You have to put yourself -- I have not walked in the shoes of somebody who's had treatment like that, right? So, I feel like I'm not an expert on deciding what's sexist and not sexist. I'd like to think that there isn't going to be sexist coverage. You know what I mean? Like, good grief, we live in the 21st -- I can't even imagine it being treated differently anymore. I really think that -- I'd like to think the media's grown up about that. MEDIA MATTERS: We shall hope. TODD: Maybe I'm wrong. Now, that doesn't mean it may not get used as a political tactic one way or the other, just because that's politics sometimes? Identity politics can sometimes bring out the worst in people on the left and right. But I think for the most part -- I would like to think that in the mainstream media, you're not going to see - MEDIA MATTERS: How about Benghazi? That's been a big issue that they've tried to nail to her, and there's been a lot of -- Fox has got a lot of inaccuracies out there and piled on. 60 Minutesobviously had a big mistake last year -- TODD: I can only defend what we've reported and what we've done. *Associated Press, via North County Public Radio: Bill Clinton to rally for Rep. Maffei in Syracuse <http://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/story/26413/20141023/bill-clinton-to-rally-for-rep-maffei-in-syracuse>* [No author mentioned] October 23, 2014 SYRACUSE, N.Y. (AP) Bill Clinton's barnstorming tour is coming to Syracuse with a get-out-the-vote rally for Rep. Dan Maffei. Bill and Hillary Clinton have blanketed the political map this fall, attending fundraisers and rallies for a long list of Democratic candidates. On Thursday, Bill Clinton is slated to attend a New Jersey fundraiser for congressional candidate Bonnie Watson Coleman and Hillary Clinton is set to rally at a Manhattan event with Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Friday afternoon, Bill Clinton will headline a "Strengthening the Middle Class" rally in support of Maffei at the Syracuse Landmark Aviation Hangar #113. *Ralston Reports: Bubba to the rescue <http://www.ralstonreports.com/blog/bubba-rescue>* By Jon Ralston October 23, 2014 10:06 a.m. If you're down on your turnout and you need a helping hand (is that James Taylor I hear), who do you call if you need a friend? Not Barack Obama this year. Bill Clinton. And I'm told the one-man Democratic turnout machine will be in Southern Nevada next week to try to juice Democratic turnout that so far has been abysmal. Clinton could help all Democrats, but my guess is this is especially targted at Rep.Steven Horsford, who needs minority voters to get energized in a district once thought safe. #wematter *Washington Post: Warren on Hillary Clinton relationship: ‘We have talked. It’s not much more than that.’ <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/10/23/warren-on-hillary-clinton-relationship-we-have-talked-its-not-much-more-than-that/>* By Sean Sullivan October 23 at 11:50 a.m. EDT Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is making one thing clear: she and Hillary Clinton aren't all that close. "We have talked. It's not much more than that. Not much more," Warren told People of her relationship with Clinton. Her response was, surprisingly, slightly less clear on another front: her presidential campaign plans. Warren has repeatedly said she does not plan to run for president in 2016, a possibility Clinton is closely considering. But when asked again whether she wants to run, she told People "I don't think so." Previously, Warren has sounded far more definitive about not running. Her office told National Journal that despite her latest comments, "nothing has changed" about her presidential plans. Warren's midterm campaign travel to early presidential nominating states has reignited speculation she might be mulling a run after all. She was recently in Iowa to campaign for Rep. Bruce Braley's Senate campaign. And she plans to campaign for Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) this weekend. It's worth noting that Warren, along with every female Democratic senator, signed a 2013 letter to Clinton encouraging her to run for president.