EFTA01007536.pdf

From: Lawrence Krauss To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: sorry.. this is draft you should look at Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 22:48:09 +0000 thanks Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287.1404 Research Office: I Assistant (Jessica): I www.lawrencemkrauss.com On Aug 23, 2018, at 3:46 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: what others say about you is meanigless. every sexual harrasssmnt case has letters of recomendation. all silly. these things did not happen as described and even if they did , they dont rise to the level of dismissal. . careful with regard diminishing the per diem payment. Im told . that is enough for jurisdiction. so when you say it cannot apply , it diminishes the rest of your argument . On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 6:43 PM, Lawrence Krauss < wrote: yes..thanks.. many more changes being made thanks to discussion with nancy.. many of which resonate with what you have already said.. stay tuned. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: Assistant (Jessica): I www.lawrencemkrauss.com On Aug 23, 2018, at 1:53 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: You must be credible!! On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:48 PM Lawrence Krauss < wrote: she reported it to buzzfeed at same time as university... anyway.. editing that now. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: Assistant (Jessica): I www.lawrencemkrauss.com On Aug 23, 2018, at 10:33 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: Why do you ignore the Australia incident BEFORE BUZZFEED EFTA01007536 On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:30 PM Lawrence Krauss > wrote: new paragraphs.. I could make it "my belief that the Dean's" in the first paragraph, but I think that dilutes it too much. Of course I believe that.. Instead I have moderated it by comparing it to the claims against me, and saying I will elaborate below. I have tempered the other statements in this paragraph. At the outset, let me emphasize in the strongest terms that the Dean's recommendation is grossly inappropriate given the claims against me, for a variety of reasons that I will elucidate here. As I will describe, the Dean based his decision on an uncritical evaluation of a deeply flawed, highly biased, and factually incomplete investigation. Not enough effort was made to check the validity of certain claims against me when parties with direct knowledge were available, the credibility of individuals who were shown to have provided false information was not questioned, and other individuals at ASU who are familiar in depth with my experiences both inside and outside ASU were not contacted. Moreover, my behavior, and its implications for others, was strongly distorted and/or misrepresented. I also changed this by adding ASU.. since it is the ASU claims that didn't arise till after.. To the extent that this may have caused any concerns among some individuals at ASU—concerns that I stress were never relayed to me or to the University during my time at ASU until after a tabloid article appeared about me Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, S Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: Assistant (Jessica): www.lawrencemkrauss.com On Aug 23, 2018, at 10:17 AM, Lawrence Krauss < > wrote: good points again. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, S Tempe, AZ 852874404 Research Office: Assistant (Jessica): I www.lawrencemkrauss.com On Aug 23, 2018, at 3:33 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: you MUST MUST state the facts accurately. you cannot say the first time was the tabloid article. the complaint re australia was first.. try not to parse and be clever with details. . I would also couch your comments as I beilieve or it appears . stating as fact that the Dean s recommendations is grossly inappropriate. shows the same disregard that they are accusing you of . you attafck the judgment of the dean his staff and your accusers. not a winning strategy. - . you have lost the first round. attacking people is not an appeal.. go to the law. its EFTA01007537  requirments that were not met. admit to a degree of social ineptitude. ( for discrimatino suit later ). talking to others about what great work you do, is also a losing argument. they believe you do sexual things as a matter of course. banter is not harrasment. no one complained , the silliness of suggesting a comment about a girls inappropriate outfit rises tto the level of a cause for termiantion of a tenured professor , needs to be looked at by others. On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Lawrence Krauss < > wrote: Sony.. here is penultimate version for tonight. I added some paragraphs at the beginning and end that I hope will appeal to the character of Michael Crow, who after all, will be the one reading this, and a few other minor changes. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, S Tempe, AZ 85287.1404 Research Office: Assistant (Jessica): www.lawrencemkrauss.com please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and EFTA01007538  destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01007539