EFTA01004598.pdf

From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Richard Kahn Subject: Re: Layer 1 Term Draft Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 14:04:28 +0000 ask him for it On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Richard Kahn < > wrote: please advise as it appears Jeremy has only sent LLC operating agreement info and nothing on Layer 1 company.. thank you Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York NY 10022 to cell Begin forwarded message: From: Jeremy Rubin a> Subject: Re: Layer 1 Term Draft Date: August 1, 2018 at 4:44:11 PM EDT To: Richard Kahn Just wanted to check in to see if this is sufficient & what sort of turnaround time I might be able to expect (the team inquired as to how long revision might take). Best, Jeremy On Thu, Jul 26, 2018, 12:47 AM Jeremy Rubin a wrote: Hi Richard, The linked operating agreement seems relatively close to what will work for Layerl. document/d/1lUhCPkGwhqhfQPN.vMeAdOpbTDEdDmgtMmJBQde9Qmytc Does this look like a reasonable staffing point to you? I think the open questions around this are, to me: 1) The founders will have 70% of the units, but will distribute some portion of that to early employees. We want these somehow to be redistributable to employees under vesting schedules. We also want to limit the governing power of these shares until the initial capital is returned (see below). EFTA01004598  One option would be to have the 70% vest and not have voting power while vesting... 2) We want is to add language that has some sort of "preferred distribution" so that we get priority on capital return until initial capital is returned. E.g., Any distributions, dividends, etc, must be paid to solely to the investors in proportion to the amount invested up until the total distributions made reach the Preference Distribution Limit. Following this point, distributions, dividends, etc will be paid solely to non-investors in proportion to the amount owned until the total distributions reach twice the Preference Distribution Limit. Following this point, all distributions, dividends, etc, must be paid in proportion to ownership with no preference for investor or non-investor. 3) It's not clear to me who should be a Managing Partner — I think maybe 2 investors and one of the founders? Once enough of their units vestfinitial capital repayed they should be able to take the majority of seats? 4) We want to define a point before they begin fund raising for their SPVs where we can vote (with other MP) to dissolve. Best, Jeremy please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01004599