EFTA02509926.pdf

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 4:25 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: THIS IS WRITTEN ONE YEAR AGO!!! With regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very strong inclination is not to be=20 involved at all . It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught w=th many pitfall many that will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. =AO I wrote you months ago that the quality of the people involved need to =e upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way before the begi=ning of my involvement ) I am also aware however of my overar=hing friendship obligations of ok, -given all the complexities =who else can do it? problem. Your family office needs a daddy. child=en with good intentions are running around , sniping , nitpicking with little direction. As a stopgap measure I am suggesting , we put in Larry Delson to take charge Everyone would report to him. eilee= included. He would however work for me. this is not, by a long shot=C2 my first choice as I prefer only being responsible and standing behind =y own personal work ( ie the word DONE will no longer be transmi=ted to reflect status stated by others ) With =o commitment on my part whatsoever, to do it. So far as I have failed in my attempt in trying to think through the problem creatively=. My organizations handling of the more complex issues I believe you might find very costly, very ! ( however many structures available some risk s=aring, maybe risk caps ,etc ) but would require my terms doing the work , not yours. Ada should be only a trust, grat administrator. not sure what role you prefer for=Eileen as you hired her initially to oversee investments. whether Ric= your controller stays or not, is not urgent. having Tom report to a =ew person,- is. coordination with Suydam Kathy gregory, I world suggest limiting to one person. The increasing public profile needs to be tak=n into consideration. talk later..c eileen did not r=port to delson, no one was hired to run office until two moths ago=C2 eileen followed your instructions. not mine. my team was not hired t= do the contracting as opposed to architecture, you kept your own team. wi=h eileen at the head. instructions were given , detailed but i=nored by your people. ,ex. jpm morgan acct still not in use? i= your calculation from where you were to where you are . you m=de a hell of a deal. -- negotiating down the original amount. =uggesting carlyn was partially my fault. ( though I had never =een asked to follow up ). suggesting that Tom was now that last word=on tax characterization. , =C2 please note The information contained in this communication =s confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute in=ide information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It =s the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thi= communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be=unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please noti=y us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and des=roy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachment=. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_01641462 EFTA02509926