👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (547 words)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 138 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/06/2012 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2,
Petitioners,
vs.
UNITED STATES,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT'S SECOND MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE
REPLIES AND RESPONSES TO PETITIONERS' RESPONSES AND
MOTIONS FILED ON DECEMBER 5, 2011
Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Second Motion for
Enlargement of Time to File Replies and Responses to Petitioners' Responses and Motions filed
on December 5, 2011, and state:
1. On December 5, 2011, petitioners filed their Response to Government's Sealed
Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (D.E. 127); Response to
Government's Sealed Motion to Stay (D.E. 129); Protective Motion for Remedies (D.E. 128);
and Protective Motion to Compel (D.E. 130). Respondent's replies to petitioners' two
responses were due on December 15, 2011, while responses to petitioners' two motions were due
on December 22, 2011.
2. On December 15, 2011, respondents moved for an enlargement of time, up to and
including January 6, 2012, to file the two responses and two replies. The Court granted
respondent's motion on December 15, 2011. D.E. 137.
EFTA_R1_00172147
EFTA01810331
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 138 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/06/2012 Page 2 of 3
3. Respondent has begun preparing its responses and replies. However, Assistant U.S.
Attorney has been occupied for the past several weeks in preparing for an
evidentiary hearing scheduled for January 24, 2012, for a motion filed by an incarcerated
individual under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Assistant U.S. Attorney will be starting a civil
trial on Tuesday, January 17, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. M.C. v. United States, Case No. 11-20216-
CIV-UNGARO (S.D.Fla.). The responses and replies will be prepared by Assistant U.S.
Attorney with limited assistance from AUSAs and.
4. On January 5, 2012, the undersigned contacted petitioners' counsel to determine their
position on the instant motion. Petitioners' counsel graciously did not oppose the instant
motion.
WHEREFORE, respondent respectfully requests a second enlargement of time, up to and
including January 24, 2012, to file its reply to petitioners' response to respondent's sealed motion
to dismiss for lack ofjurisdiction (D.E. 127), and respondent's sealed motion to stay (D.E. 129);
and to file its response to petitioners' protective motion for remedies (D.E. 128), and protective
motion to compel (D.E. 130).
DATED: January 6, 2012 Respectfully submitted,
WIFREDO A. FERRER
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
By: s/
Assistant U.S. Attorney
99 N.E. 4d, Street
Miami, Florida 33132
Fax:
2
EFTA_R1_00172148
EFTA01810332
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 138 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/06/2012 Page 3 of 3
E-mail:
Attorney for Respondent
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 6, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing
document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF.
s/
Assistant U.S. Attorney
SERVICE LIST
Jane Does I and 2 v. United States,
Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.,
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301
Fax:
E-mail
Paul G. Cassell
S.J. Quinney College of Law at the
University of Utah
332 S. 1400 E.
Salt Lake Ci , Utah 84112
Fax:
E-mail:
Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2
3
EFTA_R1_00172149
EFTA01810333
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
2d0b59a6d3e27a4faaba9910c2cac38cd551165701ed66626574925d2f782d6a
Bates Number
EFTA01810331
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
3
💬 Comments 0