📄 Extracted Text (163 words)
From: ' . AFLS "
To:
Subject: . .
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:54:03 +0000
Importance: Normal
Setting aside the non-pros and prosecuting him as though the Non-pros had never been signed.
From pogim
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 3:52 PM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: Re:
Suggest what thing?
--- Original Message
Fro (USAFLS)
To:
Sent: on Sep 011
Subject: RE:
No. He already served his sentence in state court and performed all his other obligations under the Non-Pros (including paying damages to
30-some girls). I argued it would be a Due Process violation to even suggest such a thing.
From,
Sent:
To:
Subje
Have we conceded that a showing that we violated the CVRA would justify reoopening/setting aside the nonpros?
Fro
To:
Sent
EFTA00205768
Subject: RE:
Ideally to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein and then to somehow convince us (probably through public pressure via
Se
To:
Subjec :
What is the relief jane does want in the cvra case?
EFTA00205769
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
2e0441f2478c915ad79e1ab51b8dab519231cd7c69050469fe7b711c5a233c93
Bates Number
EFTA00205768
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0