📄 Extracted Text (173 words)
From: "Martin Weinberg"
To: "Jeffery Edwards" <[email protected]>
Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:53:52 +0000
Attachments: search memo3.doc
See attached
Major contradictions between affidavit/taped statement are at 2-9, and between affidavit/Recarey
knowledge re cameras at pg 11. Problem with using tape, transcript is it will require us to disclose
same according to Bob, Mike. Given that we have the conflict cemented, my default position is to ask
questions about truthful statements on tape, get him to either deny or say no recall but not to use.
Just wanted for you to have available to review for discussion.
Martin G. Weinberg
MARTIN G. WEINBERG, PC
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston. MA 02116
****************************************************************************
This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,
and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are
not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents
of this message is prohibited.
********************************** ********* ******* ************** **********
EFTA00762577
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
2e04a03f493542eb74843f5d7b64644bfae99d41532ea42258bd2b6bce7ed565
Bates Number
EFTA00762577
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0