EFTA00762576
EFTA00762577 DataSet-9
EFTA00762578

EFTA00762577.pdf

DataSet-9 1 page 173 words document
V16 P17 V9 V13 V11
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (173 words)
From: "Martin Weinberg" To: "Jeffery Edwards" <[email protected]> Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:53:52 +0000 Attachments: search memo3.doc See attached Major contradictions between affidavit/taped statement are at 2-9, and between affidavit/Recarey knowledge re cameras at pg 11. Problem with using tape, transcript is it will require us to disclose same according to Bob, Mike. Given that we have the conflict cemented, my default position is to ask questions about truthful statements on tape, get him to either deny or say no recall but not to use. Just wanted for you to have available to review for discussion. Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG, PC 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston. MA 02116 **************************************************************************** This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. ********************************** ********* ******* ************** ********** EFTA00762577
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
2e04a03f493542eb74843f5d7b64644bfae99d41532ea42258bd2b6bce7ed565
Bates Number
EFTA00762577
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!