👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (976 words)
Mighcon de Reya
Our Ref: JLUHEW/HA/AJan Dershowia
Africa House
Your Re 70 Kingsway
London WC28 6AH
DX 37954 Kingsway
URGENT — NOT FOR PUBLICATION — STRICTLY PRIVATE &
www.mishcon.com
CONFIDENTIAL
Daily Mail
Northcliffe House
21 December 2018
2 Derry Street
London
W8 5TT
BY EMAIL
Dear Sirs
Our client: Alan Dershowitz
We act for Alan Dershowitz.
Our client is featured in an article entitled 'Second woman claims billionaire Jeffrey Epstein
"directed" her to have sex with lawyer Alan Dershowitz WHILE he was defending pedophile on
underage prostitution charges' published on your website on 18 December 2018 at the
following URL hupsiliwviw,dcally_maitccktulilne_wsfarticle-6_50974_3/S_eco_nd-v_voillan-claims-
b iunaire-Jeffrey-Epstein-directed-sex-lawyer-Alan-Dershowitz.html (the Article).
The Article
The Article contains a number of extreme) serious and highly defamatory statements about
our client's alleged involvement wit
Heading:
• "Second woman claims billionaire Jeffrey Epstein 'directed' her to have sex with lawyer Alan
Dershowitz WHILE he was defending pedophile on underage prostitution charges"
Sub-heading:
alleges that she was asked to hove sex with Alan Dershowitz by Epstein"
Body:
• "A second woman is claiming that she was 'directed' to have sex with lawyer Alan
Dershowitz by one of his clients, billionaire felon Jeffrey Epstein";
• "... she was told by Epstein to have sex with Dershowitz";
Mishcon de Reya is a limited liability
partnership. registered in England and
Wales (number OC399969). authorised
51150637.2 and regulated by the Solicitors
Switchboard: +44 (0)20 3321 7000 London: Mishcon de Reya LLP Regulation Authority. SRA number
Main Fax: +44 (0)20 7404 5982 New York: Mishcon de Reya New York UP 624547.
EFTA00794015
Mthhcon de Reya
• "Dershowitz would hove been defending Epstein at the time of the alleged sexual
encounter, having been hired to work on the case in 2005 when a number of underage
girls began coming forward and telling police they were paid to hove sex."
• "This makes the second woman to allege that she had sex with Dershowitz at the
behest of Epstein."
These allegations mean and would be understood to mean that:
• Mr Epstein directed Ms to have sex with our client;
• Our client had encouraged Mr Epstein to direct Ms in this way;
• Ms alleged that our client had sex with her;
• Our client did in fact have sex with Ms
• Our client was in some way involved in Mr Epstein's soliciting of women for
prostitution;
• Our client was in some way involved in Mr Epstein's soliciting of children for
prostitution;
• Our client's behaviour was improper and in breach of his professional obligations
and the law; and
• Our client is a sexual predator and/or a paedophile.
The facts
Our client did not have sex with Ms Indeed, our client has never met or
previously heard of Ms
Ms has been unwilling to make any claims about our client outside the courtroom
(we assume for privilege reasons).
Our client has never been in any way involved in Mr Epstein's alleged soliciting of women or
children for prostitution. Our client is not a sexual predator or a paedophile.
We are instructed that
• The allegations made b Ms form part of a wider campaign against our
client by Ms lawyer, David Boies, against whom our client has filed a
complaint with the Florida bar.
• Ms is a known fantasist_ Amongst other claims, she has claimed to have sex
tapes of the US President, Donald Trump, as well as Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and
other prominent figures. She has also accused our client of having acted for her in
the past — a claim which is easily disprovable by court records.
51150637.2 2
EFTA00794016
Macon de Reya
All of the above information was in the public domain at the time you published the Article.
Your conduct
Your conduct has been disgraceful. You published the Article without making any effort to
seek our client's comment. Further, you took the story from an article in The New York Daily
News, yet chose to ignore our client's position contained therein. You also deliberately
embellished upon the story in The New York Doily News: nowhere in that article does it state
either that Ms claimed that she had sex with our client, or that she did have sex
with him. In faa.lie the opposite, it states as follows: "Nowhere in the court case or the
transcript does or onyone else allege that had sex with Dershowitz — or that she
was directed to."
It is staggering that a news organisation as well-resourced and with such a good reputation
as yours has conducted itself in this way.
Serious harm
Given the gravity of the Allegations — which include imputations of seriously improper
and/or unlawful behaviour — as well as the nature and extent of publication, there is no
question that serious harm has been, and will continue to be, caused to our client's
reputation.
The serious harm you have caused to our client's reputation is not only causing him (and his
family) great anguish, it is likely to cause significant damage to his ability to earn in the future.
He will hold you fully liable for this.
Immediate action required
In view of the above, our client requires you to immediately do the following:
I. Remove the Article from your website.
2. Publish an apology, the terms of which to be agreed.
3. Remove any associated links to the Article within your website.
4. Undertake not to repeat the Allegations.
5. Undertake to pay our client significant damages, the quantum of which to be
agreed.
6. Undertake to pay our client his legal costs.
Please may we hear from you within 24 hours In the meantime, all our client's rights are
reserved.
51150637.2 3
EFTA00794017
Miiiheon de Reya
Yours faithfully
/AAA& ca.e.cru 'et._ L_Lis
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Direct Tel: +44 (0)20 3321 7132
Direct Fax: +44 (0)20 3761 1846
Email: [email protected]
51150637.2 4
EFTA00794018
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
2f7266f4527381ab9d0cb412e046d2b03741ca4423ff79da74360ad9a320b441
Bates Number
EFTA00794015
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
4
💬 Comments 0