EFTA02625874.pdf

DataSet-11 3 pages 823 words document
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (823 words)
From: Michael Wolff < IMI > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 5:27 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: FYI Give it some further thought, if you would. I think there =s an opening here. What you need is an excuse--or opportunity--to make the=public argument. On F=i, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:51 PM Jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@g=ail.com» wrote: tough On Fri Au 31 2018 at 11:26 AM, Michael Wolf= <mailto > wrote: Below email is mostly self-explanat=ry. Just to add that Lorin Stein, a friend of mine, was the well- regarded =ditor of the Paris Review who also appeared on the "Shitty Men in Med=a List" and who lost his job as a result. I don't know Stephen El=iot but I have always thought that the way back from this climate is throu=h specific instances of individuals successfully challenging their persecu=ion. If his story is solid he might be worth supporting. Thoughts? I'm off to London (GO Man of the Year!) and back at t=e end of next week. m Forwarded messa e From: Lorin Stein =/a» Date: Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:08 AM Subject: confiden=ial advice T°: Dear Michael, The writer Stephen Elliott<=a> got in touch yesterday. He was on the Shitty Media Men List and is look=ng for legal representation. He's not at all dumb or crazy. His pitch =etter is below. I'd be grateful if you had any ideas I could pass alon=. (He is correct that Donegan has sold a book proposal.) <https://en.wikiredia.org/wiki/Stephen_Elliottiauthor)> If you're moved to ask around, I'd ask that you please leav= my name out of it. I hope this finds you very we=l - Lorin EFTA_R1_01838296 EFTA02625874 Here's Elliott's pitch: Dear Lawyer, I was named on The Shitty Medi= Men document. You've probably heard of it. I was underlined in red fo= violent sexual assault or rape. There was a notes box in my row stating &=uot;multiple rape accusations." I can send you a copy of the list if =ou haven't seen it already. AI= of the accusation in the Shitty Media Men document are anonymous so the o=ner of the list, Moira Donegan, doesn't even necessarily know who made=the accusations. But she created the list, and published it. She's=the one who outlined me in red, I think (one of 16 entries out of 74) and =he's the one who made the note that there were "multiple" ra=e accusations. So in some way she at least edited the entry. I'm r=asonably certain the accusation of rape against me is malicious. And I don=#39;t believe there is anyone out there who believes I actually raped them= For starters, I don't like sex. I'm kinky and engage in BDSM but =nly as a submissive crossdresser. I don't enjoy penetrating women. I a=so have never had sex with anyone who works in or is connected to media, i= other words, anyone who would have had access to that list in the 12 hour= it was live online. I've written publicly about my sexuality so I'=m not worried about that aspect of my life becoming public. I dated a woma= for 2 years once without ever seeing her naked. The consequences of b=ing on the list have been profound and I would love to talk to you about i=. I can definitely document very real consequences to being named as = rapist on a publicly available list. I'm interested in discu=sing whether or not I should bring suit. I'm concerned in particular b=cause of the one year statute of limitation on defamation suits. So I woul= have to file fairly soon. =div style="font-size:12.8px">I would sue Moira Donegan and Jane Doe, I t=ink, trying to find out the names of whoever originally put me on the list= Maybe through a subpoena to Google as the original spreadsheet was a Goog=e Doc. At the same time I don't have financial means. So I underst=nd it might not be possible for you to take on this case. I don't know=if Moira has any money currently to sue for but I know she was shopping ar=und a book about the list. If she sold it there hasn't been an announc=ment. A friend in publishing told me he thinks the book sold for a fair am=unt but they're intentionally not announcing. I don't know if that=439;s true. Would you be open to discussing with me? Thank you k=div> please note The inf=rmation contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorne=-client privileged, may 2 EFTA_R1_01838297 EFTA02625875 constitute inside information, and is intended =nly for the use of the addressee. It is the property of TEE Unaut=orized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part the=eof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received th=s communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-m=il or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all co=ies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved<=r> 3 EFTA_R1_01838298 EFTA02625876
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
306d74f15ef1ff47757851b7b6929a283105b4b48938e3c1318ae4364538228c
Bates Number
EFTA02625874
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
3

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!