EFTA00732514.pdf

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 03:26:39 +0000 no message On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Martin Weinberg <I l> wrote: Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. - - On Mon, 10/4/10, Jeffrey Epstein tevarationftmaitcom> wrote: From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE EFTA00732514 To: "Martin Weinberg" Date: Monday, October 4, 2010, 10:58 PM I am not even thinking of litigation yet. I have plenty of time. Marty , its wrong, we knew something was amiss. Brad continues to make trouble. and my guess it is with a back door from critten. its not nice On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Martin Weinberg < > wrote: See below The basic rule - should be reviewed by Fla civil atty - is that a suit against an attorney permits the attorney to use privileged info in self-defense The corollary - the attorney would be limited in his reliance on confidential information to that necessary to defend his position therefore the scope of waiver is related to the scope of the lawsuit For instance - if your complaint was about a specific representation, a good argument could be made (again, the precedents need very careful checking - matter of state law) that the only confidential information that could be disclosed would be that which directly related to any decision, judgment in that specific case or any information that rebutted a claim of prejudice or damage So go slowly, assess the upside, and then the downside of any litigation Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is EFTA00732515 prohibited. -- On Mon, 10/4/10, Martin Weinberg c wrote: From: Martin Weinberg Z Subject: CONFIDENTIAL To: [email protected] Cc: Date: Monday, October 4, 2010, 3:29 PM On one hand, the voice of caution, you do not want to initiate an action that extinguishes the privileges the law firm has with you; on the other, these files should be reviewed to determine what they reflect about the duration of the overlap. Any other prior representations by Critton firm of Scarola firm? Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. --- On Mon, 10/4/10, Jeffrey Epstein tevatado naiLcom> wrote: EFTA00732516  From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: To: "Martin Weinberg" Cc: "Darren Indyke" Date: Monday, October 4, 2010, 3:08 PM Jack Goldberger show details 2:41 PM (6 hours ago) to me Try this on for size. Search Denny is in suit with a former partner claim and counterclaim. Been going on for awhile. Searcy is represented by crittons partner Greg Coleman. Should have been disclosed to you.. what should we do this explains crittens weird behavior„ his firm was involved as follows 2 cases: !. Block v. Searcy filed in Leon County on 7/42010 2010 ca 002428 2. Searcy v. Block filed in Palm Beach County on 7/22/2010 2010 ca 01881 Clearly attorney client relationship existed between Searcy, Denny and Burman, Critton at the time Critton representing you. So law firm representing your adversary representing you and conflict not disclosed *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this EFTA00732517  communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00732518