EFTA00979087.pdf
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (464 words)
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
To: ' '<
Subject: Re: Fw: Revised Separation Agreement
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:42:33 +0000
Do not
On Thursday, December 12, 2013, wrote:
Shall I add # let's try to finish today- sign fri ? Or to desperate sounding ?
Sent via BlacicBerry by AT&T
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:24:39 -0400
To: Stephen Hanson<
Subject: Re: Revised Separation Agreement
so ellis is the scumbag. can howie provide nits ?, . we will agree today on big, and sign tomorrow.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Stephen Hanson < > wrote:
Response below.
From: Ellis Rinaldi [mailto:
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:02 AM
To: Steve Hanson; Barry Sternlicht
Cc: Dan Yih; Eric Franklin; Stephenson, Tim; Charnas, Brandon S.;
Subject: RE: Revised Separation Agreement
We will discuss 1-3 and get back to you.
On 4 ... it is best if you give us all your comments. a minor markup of your remaining "nits" is best. Re
"negligent disclosure" it has been in the past drafts and every atty knows what it means. Your counsel can
explain it to you. Thx.
From: Steve Hanson [mailto
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:29 AM
To: Barry Sternlicht
Cc: Dan Yih; Ellis Rinaldi; Eric Franklin; Stephenson, Tim; Charnas, Brandon S.;
Subject: RE: Revised Separation Agreement
Barry.
EFTA00979087
We are just about there, The lawyers are reviewing the language today, and we should be able to close today or tomorrow.
A few questions/thoughts:
1. If you follow the previous email trail and document revisions from your side, the last document from your side agreed to the non-compete limited
to NY and NJ, mirroring the agreement in our LLC operating agreement. When I asked for you to consider allowing a carve-out for 2 restaurants, I
thought that the carve-out was for 2 restaurants located in NY and NJ. The last draft showed a change eliminating the opportunity for me to being
able to work in the entire United States, except for 2 restaurants outside of NY and NJ? Thoughts?
2. I think it reasonable that I should be given notice, if you guys think I breached our agreement and a period within which to cure the breach.
mirroring all our o
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00979088
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
33c1e23c6a62705d9ab6df3b4e37b0b648d59608bb3ec65535f46243cd0135af
Bates Number
EFTA00979087
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0