👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (313 words)
From: Lesley Groff
To: Dawn Henry <I
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 13:56:13 +0000
thank you...I will relay...
On Jun 12, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Dawn Henry < > wrote:
Hi Lesley:
The best way to answer that question is to send proposed language.
Dawn
From: Lesley Groff [mailto
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 10:06 AM
To: Dawn Henry
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Commissioner Henry...below response to your email is from Jeffrey:
Can we sign a more comprehensive release on both sides .
On Jun 11, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Dawn Henry > wrote:
Hi Lesley:
Thanks for the email. I explained in a previous email to Mr. Epstein that the changes made to DPNR's draft consent
agreement is not only substantive, but also does not fall within the language of "SEP". I was asked and I agreed to
allow for a SEP in lieu of a penalty. The language DPNR drafted is the correct language. I can tweak the language, but
the language can not read like the Respondent is making a donation to settle this matter. As before I was told about a
specific issue and language was worked out. I requested that Great Jim, indicate with specificity the issue to see if
language can be worked out. However, the draft document that Mr. Epstein signed, I can not sign. Finally, there will
continue to be delays, with every suggested language change.
Dawn Henry
From: Lesley Groff [mailto:
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 10:53 AM
To: Dawn Henry
Subject: Jeffrey Epstein
Hello Commissioner Henry. Please see message and attachment from Jeffrey Epstein.
Thank you,
Lesley
Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein
EFTA00454268
Please see the attached. It essentially expands the release.
The $160K grant is also being sent to your office today.
I was hoping to meet with JP to review future plans on June 17, if possible
EFTA00454269
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
344af418a66a2e9df9546be603530d5ea69fcec816f09fd75bb00fba5e95f2df
Bates Number
EFTA00454268
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0